Fox just fired Trump boosters Diamond and Silk because the network needs scapegoats

Fox just fired Trump boosters Diamond and Silk because the network needs scapegoats
President Donald J. Trump meets a with African American Leaders Thursday, Feb. 27, 2020, in the Cabinet Room of the White House. (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour)

Although Fox News and Fox Business have been widely criticized for downplaying the dangers of coronavirus, very few pundits at the right-wing cable news outlets have actually lost their jobs because of it. However, Fox News parted company with former host Trish Regan in March and is now severing its ties to frequent guests Diamond and Silk, the Daily Beast reported on Monday evening. And as Media Matters’ Matt Gertz sees it, singling Diamond and Silk out for termination is hypocritical in light of how terrible Fox News’ overall coverage of the pandemic has been.


“Diamond and Silk’s departure isn’t a sign that Fox is becoming more responsible about its handling of the pandemic,” Gertz asserts. “The network doesn’t have hard standards against lies, bigotry, or conspiracy theories that it enforces on its right-wing commentators. Instead, it has a public relations strategy that revolves around sacrificing low-level employees when they draw too much negative media attention for their remarks, while protecting its big stars when they do the same thing.”

During their Fox News appearances, Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, a.k.a. Diamond and Silk, said many of the types of things that others at Fox News typically said — for example, claiming that the mainstream media were exaggerating the dangers of coronavirus in the hope of inflicting harm on Donald Trump’s presidency. Diamond and Silk insisted that “the number of American coronavirus deaths has been inflated to make Trump look bad” — a claim Gertz describes as “baseless.”

“The duo’s comments were risible and dangerous,” Gertz writes. “They also weren’t dissimilar from what more prominent Fox employees have said on the network’s highest-rated programs, albeit in a more high-brow fashion.”

Gertz cites some examples of recent coronavirus coverage at Fox, noting, “Star host Tucker Carlson and Brit Hume, Fox’s senior political analyst, argued on ‘Tucker Carlson Tonight’ earlier this month that the COVID-19 death toll had been inflated due to what Carlson termed journalists’ ‘agenda.’ In fact, data suggests that the COVID-19 death total has been significantly undercounted.”

Gertz points out that similarly, Fox made Regan “the scapegoat for its much-maligned coverage minimizing the danger posed by the coronavirus in late February and early March.”

Regan, Gertz recalls, “had claimed that Trump’s enemies were using the coronavirus (in) ‘an attempt to demonize and destroy the president,’ describing this as ‘yet another attempt to impeach the president.’ That language closely matched how other Fox personalities had talked about the virus — notably, star host Sean Hannity, as The Washington Post’s Erik Wemple noted. But when Fox took heat for its coronavirus programming, the network’s executives threw Regan overboard and took no action against Hannity.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.