'This was a disaster for Republicans': MSNBC host says a Trump attorney just 'came up empty' in Senate trial

'This was a disaster for Republicans': MSNBC host says a Trump attorney just 'came up empty' in Senate trial
MSNBC

After former independent counsel Ken Starr, who led the impeachment push against former President Bill Clinton, defended President Donald Trump in his Senate impeachment trial on Monday, MSNBC host Ari Melber gave the attorney's performance a devastating review.


"This was a disaster for Republicans," Melber said. "A total, unmitigated, legal and constitutional disaster."

Starr's previous position advocating for the impeachment of a Democrat contrasted with his present position of opposing the impeachment of a Republican, requiring a non-partisan explanation to be taken credibly. But Starr couldn't provide one.

And his own history, Melber explained, undermined the Trump lawyers' claims that "abuse of power," the charge laid out in the first article of impeachment, is an insufficient basis for removing a president.

"Ken Starr, at no point in this dramatic — at times mournful — opening explained in any factual or legal way what's different," Melber said. "If anything, he drew attention — and there are senators in that body who know the history — he drew attention to the fact that the last two times we had these modern impeachments, Clinton and Nixon, we had abuse of power among the original articles."

He continued: "Abuse of power is the ultimate high crime. And it is what presidents usually get impeached for.  And so listening to this, it was remarkable, because Ken Starr is Mr. Abuse of Power. And I was listening, interested, open-minded, ready to hear him somehow distinguish, explain, get into foreign policy. He had nothing! He came up empty!"

Starr, Melber said, was just seen to constitutionally "punch himself in the face" in Trump's defense.

Asked by host Nicolle Wallace what explained Starr's change of heart on impeachment, Melber said he was just "clearly a hypocrite." He noted that in Starr's recent book, the former independent counsel wrote: "'Abuse of power was our judgment that Clinton had improperly employed the powers of his office, including meritless invocations of the doctrine of' — wait for it — 'executive privilege.'"

Trump has used vague and ridiculously broad "executive privilege" claims, and similar assertions, to block evidence from the impeachment inquiry, which triggered the second impeachment article: obstruction of Congress. Trump's defenders say this article is unfair because the president has a right to assert a privilege even if it laters fails in court, but Starr's own previous arguments undercut that defense.

Watch the clip below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.