Democrats are outraged as Mike Pompeo's admission collapsed his defense of Trump's attack on Iran

Democrats are outraged as Mike Pompeo's admission collapsed his defense of Trump's attack on Iran
Fox News

Secretary of Mike Pompeo said Thursday there is "no doubt" that assassinated Iranian commander Qasem Soleimani was planning imminent attacks on Americans but—in the very same sentence—admitted the U.S. doesn't know when or where such attacks would take place.


"There were a series of imminent attacks that were being plotted by Qasem Soleimani, and we don't know precisely when and we don't know precisely where, but it was real," Pompeo told Fox News' Laura Ingraham.

Watch:

Members of Congress critical of the Trump administration's decision to assassinate Soleimani immediately pounced on Pompeo's remarks, suggesting the secretary of state is either lying about the supposed attacks or doesn't know the definition of imminent.

"That is not what 'imminent' means," tweeted Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.). "It's this kind of obfuscation, lying to Congress, and unchecked provocation that dragged us into the Iraq War. We will not allow that to happen again. Yesterday's War Powers vote will ensure that."

Other Democratic lawmakers weighed in:

Pompeo, a driving force behind the Trump administration's hawkish Iran policies, told Fox he believes White House officials did a "dynamite job" briefing lawmakers on the supposed intelligence that justified the assassination of Soleimani.

As Common Dreams reported Wednesday, lawmakers from both parties condemned the classified briefing as "insulting" and said White House officials did not provide a shred of evidence of an imminent attack.

In response to Pompeo's Fox interview, Rep. Justin Amash (I-Mich.) tweeted, "This is about as much as they told Congress in a classified setting."

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who attended the Senate briefing on Soleimani, said in an interview with NBC Friday that he didn't hear anything from Trump administration officials that amounted to evidence of an imminent attack.

"The difficulty that we have, and I don't mean to be rude here, is that we have a president who is a pathological liar," said Sanders, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate. "So could it be true? I guess it could be. Is it likely to be true? Probably not."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.