Mick Mulvaney makes bogus claim to avoid testifying as witnesses point to his central role in Trump's quid pro quo

Mick Mulvaney makes bogus claim to avoid testifying as witnesses point to his central role in Trump's quid pro quo
White House acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney speaks with reporters Thursday, Oct. 17, 2019, in the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House. (Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian)

Hours after Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney claimed "absolute immunity" from cooperating with the House impeachment probe into President Donald Trump, Democrats leading the inquiry released sworn testimony from two key witnesses who placed the chief of staff at the center of President Donald Trump's effort to pressure Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden.


Fiona Hill, Trump's former top Russia adviser, told House impeachment investigators last month about a July 10 meeting in which U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland "blurted out" Mulvaney's role in arranging a White House visit for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

"Mulvaney personally ordered the hold on Ukraine aid. His refusal to come forward and tell Congress why he did that is utterly damning."

—Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.)

"Well, we have an agreement with the chief of staff for a meeting if these investigations in the energy sector start," Sondland said, according to Hill. Sondland was apparently referring to Burisma, a natural gas company that used to employ Hunter Biden, the former vice president's son.

Then-national security adviser John Bolton "immediately stiffened and ended the meeting" after Sondland's remarks, Hill told House Committees.

Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, a National Security Council official who listened to Trump's July 25 phone call with Zelensky, corroborated Hill's account of the White House meeting, which was attended by Ukrainian officials and Trump advisers.

"Sondland relatively quickly went into outlining how the—you know, these investigations need to—on the deliverable for these investigations in order to secure this meeting [between Trump and Zelensky]," Vindman said. "I heard him say that this had been coordinated with White House Chief of Staff Mr. Mick Mulvaney."

Erin Banco, national security reporter for The Daily Beastreported that Hill and Vindman's testimonies "mark the most direct link between the scandal now imperiling the presidency and the president's chief of staff."

The depositions were made public just hours after Mulvaney refused to comply with a subpoena to testify as part of House Democrats' impeachment probe.

The acting chief of staff reportedly informed House committees "one minute before" his deposition was scheduled to begin that he would not show up and asserted "absolute immunity."

Legal analysts on Friday swiftly called into question the legal basis for Mulvaney's "absolute immunity claim":

Mulvaney, who previously ran the Office of Management and Budget, became a focus of House Democrats' investigation after the Washington Post reported in September that he put a hold on $400 million of appropriated Ukraine aid on instructions from Trump. During a press briefing last month, Mulvaney admitted the aid was withheld to pressure Ukraine to launch investigations on behalf of Trump.

Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.) tweeted Friday that it is "hard to imagine something more suspicious and damaging than the White House's own chief of staff afraid to tell the truth under oath."

"Mulvaney personally ordered the hold on Ukraine aid," said Beyer. "His refusal to come forward and tell Congress why he did that is utterly damning."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.