Trump made US officials 'cringe' by revealing classified and inaccurate info about Baghdadi operation: report

Trump made US officials 'cringe' by revealing classified and inaccurate info about Baghdadi operation: report
ABC News

President Donald Trump shared both false and classified information during his announcement of the U.S. operation that killed ISIS leader Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi over the weekend, according to a new report from NBC News.


The report said that U.S. officials told NBC News that they "cringed" when they heard Trump's remarks, which have been widely panned and criticized on other grounds.

Here's what the report said was just flat-out wrong in Trump's remarks:

A couple of the president's statements on Sunday were inaccurate or left U.S. officials wondering where he got his information, officials said. The president said when U.S. officials notified Russia it would be entering airspace in western Syria, they told the Russians, "We think you're going to be very happy." But that phrase was not said on the call with the Russians, a U.S. official said. Trump also said al-Baghdadi was "crying and screaming" as U.S. forces chased him down, but U.S. officials said they didn't hear those sounds, and Milley told reporters he doesn't know the source of the president's information on that.

But beyond Trump's usual trouble with facts, the speech also featured another major failing of the president: a lack of care with classified and sensitive information. As president, Trump has the authority to declassify whatever he wants, but that doesn't mean it's wise or tactically sound. And NBC reported that many of the details Trump revealed in his theatric retelling of the events could backfire and hurt U.S. military and intelligence interests:

Revealing that the U.S. possesses documents about future ISIS plans hurts the military's ability to use that information for quick follow-on operations, officials said. The president's disclosure that the U.S. had taken ISIS fighters from the compound complicated efforts to try to keep ISIS from knowing who is alive or dead for as long as possible while they interrogate them, officials said.

Some of the president's comments could complicate the intelligence gathering that leads to such raids because they revealed sources and methods the U.S. uses, officials said. They pointed to his saying that the U.S. knew of al-Baghdadi's whereabouts via technology, and also knew of the underground tunnels at his compound, which suggests the U.S. has infrared abilities to locate caves and tunnels.

"We knew it had tunnels. The tunnels were a dead end, for the most part. There was one, we think, that wasn't. But we had that covered, too, just in case," Trump said.

Other information Trump discussed provided America's enemies with tactical details on how the military carries out a raid like the one on al-Baghdadi, officials said, including the robot, the helicopter flight patterns and how U.S. forces entered the compound.

None of this should be surprising, of course. This is exactly what we should expect from an egomaniacal, undisciplined, reality TV star who became president. The great irony, of course, is that the 2016 election was largely waged over the phony idea that Hillary Clinton's email use as secretary of state showed her to be unqualified to be president — precisely because it she displayed carelessness with classified information.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.