Republicans ramp up loyalty attacks on National Security Council Ukraine expert as he testifies in impeachment inquiry

Republicans ramp up loyalty attacks on National  Security Council Ukraine expert as he testifies in impeachment inquiry
Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman image via Screengrab.

How do you undercut a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army and top expert on Ukraine testifying about his concerns over actions that threaten the security of Ukraine and the United States and over a phone call he personally witnessed? To paraphrase Dr. Ian Malcolm, Republicans … find a way.

There’s Fox News determining that Vindman is actually a Ukrainian double agent working inside the White House, with convicted former Deputy Attorney General John Yoo tossing on a charge of “espionage” against Vindman. The crime? Talking to Ukrainian officials who called the White House out of concern for what Rudy Giuliani was doing in their country.

There’s Sean Duffy on CNN declaring that, since Vindman was born in Ukraine, he has “an affinity for Ukraine,” but “I don't know that he's concerned about American policy.” Vindman was brought to the United States when he was 3 years old. He’s spent the last 41 years in the United States, including serving in the United States Army since 1998. That includes a 2003 deployment to Iraq in which Vindman was wounded. It would seem he has some claim to be concerned about the United States.

The He’s Not Really One of Us kit was unpacked again on Fox & Friends, on which Brian Kilmeade again dismissed the Purple Heart recipient’s connections to the country he’s served for decades. Instead, says Kilmeade, Vindman "… tends to feel simpatico with Ukraine.” And to stick even more distance between this darn double-agenty espionager and good red-hat-wearing Americans, Kilmeade also made sure to frame it by saying, “We also know he was born in the Soviet Union.”

And of course Donald Trump tweeted in to call Vindman a “Never Trumper.” A term he helpfully defined last week as meaning “human scum.”

All of which shows just how much the right continues to fixate on undermining the messengers—because it can’t live with the message.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.