Jim Jordan and GOP battered by CNN panel for blatant lying about damning State Department texts

Jim Jordan and GOP battered by CNN panel for blatant lying about damning State Department texts
Rep. Jim Jordan (Image via Gage Skidmore)

A CNN panel discussion led by host Jim Sciutto blistered Republican defenders of Donald Trump for intentionally misrepresenting evidence in State Department texts that indicate the president was withholding aid to Ukraine in return for cooperation in digging up disparaging information on former Vice President Joe Biden.

Speaking with former GOP lawmaker Charlie Dent (PA) and Democratic strategist Paul Begala, host Sciutto started off with a clip of Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) dismissing the information in the texts as nothing that was concerning.

"How can he say that when so clearly the text messages seem to corroborate many aspects of the whistle-blower complaint," the CNN host asked rhetorically.

Turning to guest Dent, Sciutto stated, "We're so far through the looking glass right now."

"Even when you have what seems to be black and white evidence, I won't call it proof, to exactly what the whistleblower said in their complaint about these signs of a quid pro quo, these signs of a quid pro quo, pressure, leverage on the Ukrainian government what the president wanted here, why isn't that changing the narrative, convincing really any Republican to come out and call it like it is?" Sciutto asked.

"The reason why they're not calling it out is because elements of their base have not turned on the president yet," Dent replied. "But we have to be very clear, what the president has done here is he has used resources -- the resources of the federal government to try to dig up dirt or investigate the Bidens."

"That's simply -- it's wrong. It's inappropriate, it's frankly, I don't know if it's criminal or not, but this is a major problem," he continued. "I served as chairman of the House Ethics Committee and I'll tell you, if these sorts of things were brought up about a member of the House using his office for these purposes, this would have triggered immediate investigation and probably a referral to the Department of Justice at some point."

Watch below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.