alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Trump is humiliating the Department of Justice and tearing its credibility to shreds

Trump is humiliating the Department of Justice and tearing its credibility to shreds
Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

If you work for Donald Trump, there's a good chance you'll end up being shamed and humiliated. That's long been true for his closest aides and appointees, many of who have been shuffled off the national stage in disgrace or with their reputations ruined — or both.

But now the principle may be extending even further, touching even career officials who work in federal government departments and traditionally stay in their jobs even as presidents change.

Trump's latest proxy humiliation came for Joshua Gardner, who has been defending the administration in the legal battle over the citizenship question on the Census. After the Supreme Court last week upheld a lower court's decision to block the question, the administration's lawyers told the courts Tuesday that it had given up on trying to include that section on the Census survey forms. But the very next day, the president tweeted that what his own administration's lawyers had claimed was fake news and that he would continue fighting to include the citizenship question.

That led to Gardner — while on vacation — getting called to speak with a federal judge to explain the change. Gardner was clearly flummoxed, saying that he didn't have any new information in addition to the tweet and that he was trying to figure out what was going on. It was only then that another DOJ lawyer jumped into the discussion to confirm that the administration is seeking out possible alternative routes to include the question.

But the humiliation didn't stop there. Previously, the Justice Department had repeatedly argued that the issue needed to be resolved by the end of June of 2019 so that the Census Bureau could be prepared in time for 2020. Now, forced by Trump, it is backtracking on those claims, severely undercutting its own credibility.

As I noted earlier, Judge George Hazel even seemed to mock the Justice Department's most recent filing in the case.

All these developments came on top of the Supreme Court's stunning — though not surprising — decision last week that said the administration's initial reason for including the citizenship question "seems to have been contrived." Chief Justice Roberts was essentially saying that the administration was lying.

And just a few weeks ago, another Justice Department lawyer came under fire when she defended the administration's immigration detention centers, even when they lacked soap and toothbrushes for children.

Trump doesn't care, of course, if his Justice Department lawyers are humiliated and their credibility is shot. He's not interested in defending the people who work on his behalf. All he cares about is his immediate goals, and he'll obliterate any institutions he needs to in order to achieve them.

That doesn't mean we should feel bad for the Justice Department lawyers, of course. They can and should stand up to Trump, refuse to do what their told, or resign when face with incongruent or obviously wrong orders. Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates took a stand when Trump tried to make her defend the indefensible — though she was already on her way out, and not as dependent on her position as career officials are. But if more administration officials took this path, it could deal a significant blow to Trump and stymie some of his outrageous actions.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.