Trump administration considers scaling back its North Korea ambitions — but the president's lies stay big

Trump administration considers scaling back its North Korea ambitions — but the president's lies stay big
Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

While Donald Trump was becoming the first U.S. president to go into North Korea, the Trump administration may be scaling back its ambitions with the country, from complete denuclearization to a nuclear freeze that accepts North Korea as a nuclear power. It isn’t admitting that publicly, but The New York Times reports that, in the idea beginning to come together, “American negotiators would seek to expand on Mr. Kim’s offer in Hanoi in February to give up the country’s main nuclear-fuel production site, at Yongbyon, in return for the most onerous sanctions against the country being lifted.”


That offer to give up Yongbyon would need to be significantly expanded for a deal to be any kind of win for Trump, since North Korea by now has nuclear capability at many other sites. It would, on the other hand, be a chance for Trump to claim to have accomplished something other than getting a dictator to meet with him.

Trump is trying to claim that as a win, though. Although the meetings between the two countries’ leaders have done Kim Jong Un more favors than they have Trump, Trump is claiming that “President Obama wanted to meet, and Chairman Kim would not meet him. The Obama administration was begging for a meeting. They were begging for meetings constantly, and Chairman Kim would not meet with him.” A series of former Obama officials pushed back immediately and forcefully. Susan Rice, the former national security adviser, called it “horseshit,” with agreement from George W. Bush’s CIA director, Michael Hayden. Former director of national intelligence James Clapper elaborated, saying, “In all the deliberations that I participated in on North Korea during the Obama administration, I can recall no instance whatever where President Obama ever indicated any interest whatsoever in meeting with Chairman Kim.”

Gee, Donald Trump lying. Who would have thought?

Democratic presidential candidates responded to Trump’s North Korea posturing with a combination of questions, criticism, and outright eye-rolling. “I’m not quite sure why this president is so bent on elevating the profile of a dictator,” Julián Castro told CNN. “It’s all symbolism, it’s not substance.” “Despite three years of almost bizarre foreign policy from this president, this country is no safer when it comes to North Korea,” said former Rep. Beto O’Rourke.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.