'Ominous': Experts weigh in on DOJ's desperate census lawyers shakeup

'Ominous': Experts weigh in on DOJ's desperate census lawyers shakeup
William Barr image via PBS NewsHour

The Dept. of Justice late Sunday evening announced it is replacing its team of attorneys who have spent countless hours in the Trump administration's long battle to get what some say is a racist citizenship question added to the 2020 Census.

Experts are weighing in, with one calling the move "ominous."

“As will be reflected in filings tomorrow in the census-related cases, the Department of Justice is shifting these matters to a new team of Civil Division lawyers going forward," DOJ spokesperson Kerri Kupec said in a statement.

The New York Times quoted Justin Levitt, a former senior official in the Justice Department under President Barack Obama, who said: “There is no reason they would be taken off that case unless they saw what was coming down the road and said, ‘I won’t sign my name to that.’”

Some believe what is coming down the road is the DOJ lying to the federal courts – or that it already has.

Lawyer Luppe B. Luppen, who is a noted commentator on Twitter and writer at Yahoo News, offered up this theory:

Meanwhile, renowned election law expert and law and political science professor Rick Hasen weighed in quickly:

Hasen was not the only one who surmised the DOJ attorneys who had argued the case decided they could no longer do so under the circumstances.

Some legal experts say the first team was thoroughly embarrassed when President Donald Trump tweeted that reports saying the administration would abide by the Supreme Court's ruling and not add the citizenship question to the Census were "fake," especially since those reports were official statements from the Trump administration. The first team may have "declined to continue working on the case once it became clear they were being asked to engage in lawyering that violated their duty of candor to the court," former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance said.

"Career folks likely declined to make convoluted arguments to pacify Trump given [their] ethics obligations," she added.

"Never heard of anything like this," law professor and former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said on Twitter.

ThinkProgress columnist Ian Millhiser, who wrote a book on the Supreme Court, issued this wise warning:

Why is this question so critical for Trump? Because it will benefit white Republican voters and possibly reduce the number of Democratic districts in the U.S. House of Representatives, by scaring minorities – especially non-citizens – from responding to the Census.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.