'It's sociopathic': MSNBC host rails against the warmongers now turning their sights on Iran

'It's sociopathic': MSNBC host rails against the warmongers now turning their sights on Iran

MSNBC's Chris Hayes expressed and disbelief on Thursday as President Donald Trump's administration appears to be creeping closer to a military conflict with Iran — and repeating the well-known mistakes of the past.

"I feel like I'm losing my mind watching all the people who got us into Iraq, which killed hundreds of thousands of people and massively strengthened Iran, now pushing for a war with Iran," said Hayes on Twitter. "It's sociopathic."

He continued: "I mean, by all means, let's have Donald J Trump oversee a US war in the second largest country in the middle east. Obviously that is a great idea."

National Security Adviser John Bolton is clearly the most enthusiastic administration advocate for war, and he seems to have the support of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

CNN correspondent Alexander Marquardt explained:

Voices outside the administration, too, seem inclined to embrace conflict. New York Times opinion writer Bret Stephens wrote a recent aggressive piece declaring: "If Iran won’t change its behavior, we should sink its navy."

He concluded: "Nobody wants a war with Iran. But not wanting a war does not mean remaining supine in the face of its outrages. We sank Iran’s navy before. Tehran should be put on notice that we are prepared and able to do it again."

But he barely acknowledged Trump's own role in ramping up tensions with the country by pulling the United States out of the Iran nuclear deal and reinstating sanctions. When he addressed this fact, he recounted the reimposition of sanctions as if it were a force of nature, rather than a reckless choice by an incompetent president:

This might be seen as a response to the resumption of major U.S. sanctions, which have had a punishing effect on Iran’s economy. Except that Tehran did nothing to moderate its behavior after the nuclear deal was signed, and most sanctions were lifted, in 2016.

Of course, in response to the nuclear deal, Tehran complied with the provisions of the agreement, which is precisely all that can legitimately be expected from a deal. But apparently, this doesn't count as "moderating" to Stephens.

Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, too, seems intent on launching an attack. Citing the reports from the U.S. government claiming that Iranian-linked forces sabotaged an oil tanker — reports which remain dubious — Cotton said, "These unprovoked attacks on commercial shipping warrant a retaliatory military strike." He expressed little reticence about how an attack could spiral out of control or affect the region.

All of which should make us very nervous about who the administration is listening to and what it may end up doing. Or, perhaps most crucially, what Bolton may convince Trump to do.

As Hayes noted:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.