This right-wing senator just said the U.S. could quickly 'win' a war against Iran with 'two strikes'

This right-wing senator just said the U.S. could quickly 'win' a war against Iran with 'two strikes'
Firing Line (Screenshot)

In a new interview with Firing Line's Margaret Hoover, GOP Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas expressed naive confidence about the prospect of war with Iran — a prospect that President Donald Trump's top advisers seem intent on driving the country toward.

"Could we win a war with Iran?" asked Hoover.

"Yes," said Cotton.

"That didn't take you a second," she said.

"Two strikes: the first strike and a last strike," Cotton said.

Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, on the other hand, had a much more realistic idea of what's at stake in a possible war on Twitter: "Trump thinks our troops are toy soldiers he can just move around—but these are real men and women whose lives are at stake. Many are in my state. I've got a kid in the military. And I will do anything I can to stop this President from getting us into a war we should not be in."

He similarly compared the rush to war with the George W. Bush administration's disastrous bumbling into Iraq. And that's much closer to how Americans should think about the prospect of an Iran war — a duplication of the Iraq war. That didn't end when the U.S. took out Saddam Hussein, because it threw the country into turmoil. We were responsible for that chaos, and American leaders felt we would be at risk if they allowed the disaster to worsen. So we stayed, and American soldiers are still in Iraq 16 years later. In the meantime, hundreds of thousands — if not more — were killed as a result of the conflict.

That's what Americans should expect if Trump brings us to war with Iran. And to be fair to Cotton, the interview suggests he's not hoping for that outcome. He didn't outright call for regime change, though he called on the regime to change its actions.

"War is never inevitable," Cotton said. "War is always the product of human choices."

It's a good point, but one of those choices is underestimating the cost and the difficulty of war — and having a poorly defined sense of what "winning" would mean at all. And on that front, Cotton's reckless assertion that a war could be won with "two strikes" only increases the likelihood of a conflict.

Watch the clip below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.