'I believe you': New report reveals disturbing details from Trump's clandestine meetings with Putin

'I believe you': New report reveals disturbing details from Trump's clandestine meetings with Putin
Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead

President Donald Trump has gone to unprecedented lengths to keep the details of his meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin almost entirely secret, a new report in the Washington Post revealed Saturday.

His insistence on keeping top aides in the dark about the details and limiting access to the meetings — an American translator was Trump's only companion during his two-hour session with Putin at the Helsinki summit in July 2018 — has disturbed both current and former officials, according to the report. Presidents typically rely on aides' help in interpreting and reflecting on such meetings, and in light of Trump's bizarre relationship to Puting and the ongoing inquiries into his ties to the Kremlin's influence operation during the 2016 campaign, his actions are perplexing and raise the potential of corruption.

On one occasion in Hamburg, Trump spoke with Putin in July 2017 one-on-one with only a Russian interpreter present, a move that caused many to sound the alarms at the time.

Some critics of the president in Congress have honed in on the translators at these meetings as potential objective sources of information about the secret details. But an effort to obtain the Helsinki translator's notes, after outrage at Trump's public embrace of Putin's denial of responsibility for the 2016 interference, was scuttled by objections that it would undermine the integrity of translation duties.

On at least one occasion, according to the Post, Trump took his interpreters' notes after the meeting with Putin and swore the interpreter to secrecy even from other administration officials. Current administration officials have sought information from the interpreters because they wanted more details about the meetings in addition to those that were provided internally.

The interpreters have not been forthcoming, the Post reports, aside from one detail about the meeting in Hamburg, at which Trump was joined by then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson:

In a news conference afterward, Tillerson said that the Trump-Putin meeting lasted more than two hours, covered the war in Syria and other subjects, and that Trump had “pressed President Putin on more than one occasion regarding Russian involvement” in election interference. “President Putin denied such involvement, as I think he has in the past,” Tillerson said.

Tillerson refused to say during the news conference whether Trump had rejected Putin’s claim or indicated that he believed the conclusion of U.S. intelligence agencies that Russia had interfered.

Tillerson’s account is at odds with the only detail that other administration officials were able to get from the interpreter, officials said. Though the interpreter refused to discuss the meeting, officials said, he conceded that Putin had denied any Russian involvement in the U.S. election and that Trump responded by saying, “I believe you.”

There are potentially innocent explanations for some of Trump's behavior described in the report. Trump's administration has been particularly prone to leaks, and he reportedly wanted to establish a personal rapport with Putin. But in light of the ongoing Russia investigation, the widespread scrutiny his relationship with Putin has received, and the blockbuster New York Times report published Friday revealing that the FBI opened a counterintelligence investigation to determine whether or not the president was essentially a Kremlin asset, his secrecy will be seen as even more suspicious than it is on its face. The fact that he's been willing to use such dubious measures despite the criticism they were bound to receive makes them even more worrying.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.