Federal judge strikes down Trump's plan to add citizenship question to Census

Federal judge strikes down Trump's plan to add citizenship question to Census
Image credit: Voice of America

On Tuesday morning, in a huge victory for civil rights activists, federal judge Jesse Furman issued an order blocking President Donald Trump's Department of Commerce from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

The case, brought by the New York State Attorney General's office, is almost certain to be appealed by the Justice Department in a battle that could end up in the Supreme Court:

The Census, which counts the entire U.S. population at the start of each decade, has sometimes included a question on citizenship status in the long-form questionnaire, which only goes out to a subset of the population. But the short-form questionnaire, which is sent to every household, has not asked about citizenship since 1950, and for good reason: experts believe a question with such loaded connotations might discourage people from returning their questionnaire at all.

An inaccurate Census count would be disastrous, throwing off everything from how many representatives each state has to how much funding states receive for roads, schools, and hospitals. Undercounting could be especially severe in states with large immigrant populations of color who might fear the information could be used to deport them, like California, Texas, and New York.

There is also an ongoing dispute about who made the decision to include the citizenship question in the first place, and why. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross previously told Congress under oath that the Justice Department asked for a citizenship question to facilitate compliance with the Voting Rights Act — but emails discovered in a lawsuit over the policy revealed that Ross actually enacted the question on the advice of former Trump advisers Steve Bannon and Kris Kobach.

Judge Furman previously allowed Ross to deposed over the issue, but the Supreme Court put that deposition on hold. With his new order vacating the citizenship question altogether, Furman threw away his old order as moot.

Activists have a long way to go in the fight to ensure the integrity of the Census. But Tuesday's ruling was an important and promising first step.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.