Trump just severely undermined his own defense against accusations that he broke campaign finance laws

Trump just severely undermined his own defense against accusations that he broke campaign finance laws

In a new interview with Fox News on Thursday, President Donald Trump casually undermined his sole apparent defense against charges of criminally violating campaign finance law.

He's at risk of such charges after his former employee, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to three years in prison, in part for making hush payments during the campaign on Trump's behalf in violation of the law. Cohen said that he made the payments at Trump's direction and in coordination with him, implicating the president in the crime.

Thursday morning, Trump tried to distance himself from the crimes on Twitter, writing of Cohen: "He was a lawyer and he is supposed to know the law. It is called 'advice of counsel,' and a lawyer has great liability if a mistake is made. That is why they get paid."

Legal experts point out that pointing to the advice of counsel can be a defense against some crimes. But it's hard for Trump to stick to a script — and in the Fox News interview aired broadcast later in the day, Trump significantly undercut this potential defense. He said that Cohen actually didn't do much legal work and was actually provided more public relations services.

But if this is the case, Trump's claim that he relied on Cohen's advice to avoid violating the law much less credible. This is particularly true given that Don McGahn, the former White House counsel, is an expert in campaign finance law and served on the Trump campaign. If everything was above board, why didn't Trump go through McGahn instead of Cohen — who Trump admits was not mainly acting as a lawyer?

"Congratulations, you just completely undermined your defense that you didn’t commit a crime because Cohen was your lawyer and told you it was ok," said MSNBC legal analyst Matthew Miller in a tweet.

And unfortunately for Trump, his Twitter history shows that he was well aware of the case against John Edwards that accused the Democrat of the very kind of campaign finance violation that Cohen was charged of. Though the prosecution of Edwards failed, the fact that Trump was aware of the trial shows that he knew the actions he allegedly directed Cohen to undertake were illegal — a key fact that prosecutors would have to prove.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.