Forensic Specialist Describes How Investigators Will Uncover 'Toxic And Painted-Over' Materials at Crime Scene for Journalist's Murder

Turkish police have concluded an intensive nine-hour inspection of the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul, searching for possible clues in the disappearance of Saudi journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi—who was last seen entering the Consulate two weeks ago on Tuesday, October 2. The Turkish authorities were searching for evidence of foul play, and after the inspection concluded, forensic specialist Karen Smith offered her insights during an October 16 interview with CNN’s Brooke Baldwin.
 
Turkish authorities have alleged that they have video and audio recordings proving that Saudi agents murdered Khashoggi inside the Consulate before dismembering his body. And the police in Istanbul were reported to have used the chemical Luminol during their inspection.

According to Smith—a retired sheriff’s detective from Jacksonville, Florida who has handled 500 death investigations—Luminol can show evidence of foul play no matter how thoroughly one tries to cover up evidence.

“There have been scientific studies with painted surfaces where blood has been removed—seven layers of paint, and they have still detected it with a chemical called Luminol,” Smith told CNN’s Baldwin.

Luminol, Smith noted, is typically used to inspect cleaned up crime scenes. And in the type of “atrocious, horrendous crime scene” being alleged in Istanbul, Smith said, Luminol could easily turn up evidence that foul play occurred.

“Even if they painted the surfaces, even if they used bleach, there’s still going to be something left,” Smith told Baldwin.   

Asked if Luminol could offer specifics on the type of crime committed, Smith responded, “zol has some drawbacks. It’s mixed in water. That dilutes what you’re spraying it on.”

“Minute details,” according to Smith, “may not be readily available. However, shoe prints might still be there….So what we’re looking for here is basically just evidence that a violent crime occurred, see if they can extract some DNA, and then do comparisons in the lab later.”

Read More Show less
ACLU By ACLUSponsored

Imagine you've forgotten once again the difference between a gorilla and a chimpanzee, so you do a quick Google image search of “gorilla." But instead of finding images of adorable animals, photos of a Black couple pop up.

Is this just a glitch in the algorithm? Or, is Google an ad company, not an information company, that's replicating the discrimination of the world it operates in? How can this discrimination be addressed and who is accountable for it?

“These platforms are encoded with racism," says UCLA professor and best-selling author of Algorithms of Oppression, Dr. Safiya Noble. “The logic is racist and sexist because it would allow for these kinds of false, misleading, kinds of results to come to the fore…There are unfortunately thousands of examples now of harm that comes from algorithmic discrimination."

On At Liberty this week, Dr. Noble joined us to discuss what she calls “algorithmic oppression," and what needs to be done to end this kind of bias and dismantle systemic racism in software, predictive analytics, search platforms, surveillance systems, and other technologies.

What you can do:
Take the pledge: Systemic Equality Agenda
Sign up