The New York Times' Latest Effort to Appease Trump Voters Is Its Most Embarrassing Yet

After a year-plus of sending reporters out to “Trump Country” to find out what Trump voters were thinking about health care, budgets, taxes, and more, the New York Times has decided to stop reporting on Trump voters so much and just turn its pages over to them directly.


The Times editorial board has been sharply critical of the Trump presidency, on grounds of policy and personal conduct. Not all readers have been persuaded. In the spirit of open debate, and in hopes of helping readers who agree with us better understand the views of those who don’t, we wanted to let Mr. Trump’s supporters make their best case for him as the first year of his presidency approaches its close. Tomorrow we’ll present some letters from readers who voted for Mr. Trump but are now disillusioned, and from those reacting to today’s letters and our decision to provide Trump voters this platform.

No context, no inconvenient facts, just what Trump voters say—as if we don’t have the base’s adoring replies to Trump’s tweets to tell us that. One person after another who thinks Trump has crushed ISIS and deserves credit for an economy that has continued on the path it had already been on under former President Barack Obama. 

Does the Times have a mission to talk to every single Trump voter in the country? And turned to this strategy as their reporters started having trouble finding Trump voters to quote who hadn’t already been in the Times previously and on every major network? Bear in mind, Trump’s support is loooow. And yet we hear endlessly more from outlets like the Times about his supporters than we do about, say, what people who voted for the popular vote winner think after a year. Just for instance.

Maybe the Times editorial board thinks it speaks for all people who didn’t vote for Trump, but having read the paper’s coverage of Hillary Clinton’s campaign—hell, no. This is an abdication of reporting on the American political scene. And it’s an irresponsible approach to Trump voters themselves: As one friend said, “It’s morbid fascination meets fetishization meets absolute ignorance.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.