Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

Sex Toys and the Technology of Orgasm

By Rachel Kramer Bussel, AlterNet. Posted October 4, 2007.


A new documentary offers up a disturbing history of the first vibrators and shows that sex toys aren't just for pleasure -- they're political.
Advertisement

For those who don't think pussies and their playthings are political, the new documentary Passion and Power: The Technology of Orgasm (Wabi Sabi Productions) will set you straight. Co-produced and co-directed by Wendy Slick and Emiko Omori, the film offers up a disturbing history of the first vibrators as well as a glimpse into the real-life consequences of laws still on the books in four states that ban the sale of them.

The film is based on Rachel P. Maines's 1998 book The Technology of Orgasm: "Hysteria," the Vibrator, and Women's Sexual Satisfaction (Johns Hopkins University Press), updated to include the tale of Burleson, Texas, resident Joanne Webb, who was arrested for peddling dildos and vibrators in 2005 under a state law that prohibits the sale of any "device including a dildo or artificial vagina, designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs." This despite the fact that she was on the board of her local Chamber of Commerce and got a license to peddle her wares when she started selling for Passion Parties.

Under the Texas law, ownership of six or more "obscene devices" is also illegal, based on the assumption that one intends to sell them. There is a loophole: the exception for "a bona fide medical, psychiatric, judicial, legislative or law enforcement purpose." In other words, getting off is not something the state of Texas wants to encourage in and of itself, unless you do so with your hand. A few other states such as Georgia, Mississippi and Alabama have similar laws (the Supreme Court recently declined to hear a challenge to Alabama's law).

Policing women's sex toy use isn't new, but the meaning of the vibrator has changed dramatically over time. The Technology of Orgasm shows how women's sexuality, pleasure and masturbation have been regarded alternately as taboo and important, flip-flopping back and forth between being in vogue and cloaked in secrecy and shame.

Introduced in the late 19th century, the vibrator was originally intended as a cure for so-called hysteria -- a disease manufactured by doctors during the time of Hippocrates -- and soon became a medical staple. Doctors believed that using massage to bring women to orgasm would make them less emotional, but that process took too much time, limiting the number of patients a physician could see in one day. Enter the vibrator. With help from the mechanical friend, women could have orgasms more efficiently -- and on their own time.

The perceived medical need for vibrators evaporated after only a couple of decades. By the early '20s, women were purchasing them for pleasure, with no fear of being ridiculed -- let alone arrested.

"There was no stigma attached to selling vibrators, advertising them, [or] shipping them," says Maines in the film as she shows an ad in the 1918 Sears, Roebuck and Co. catalog for "Aids That Every Woman Appreciates." Another ad shown in the book for the White Cross Electric Vibrator proclaims, "Vibration is Life."

But the film isn't just about the public's acceptance or rejection of vibrators. It reveals the longstanding connection between women's sexual exploration and their freedom to explore in other arenas.

Take Joanne Webb, for example. Was she arrested merely for selling vibrators? Filmmaker Omori doesn't think so. "Passion Parties has been selling in Texas for at least ten years," she said. "I think in this case Joanne Webb was targeted. She had a license and was perfectly legitimate as far as everybody knew. There's definitely a deeper story about persecution. Here's a woman who's very pretty, who liked to flaunt that. She was on the Chamber of Commerce committees. Obviously she offended somebody, and they dug up that law."

One of the most interesting concepts the film offers up is that the enactment of these anti-sex toy laws coincided with the rise of the feminist movement. "Independent orgasms lead to independent thoughts." Slick says, quoting author Betty Dodson. "Who was in power at the time? Men. The feminist movement was picking up power, and it was all very threatening."

"I came from an era when sex was for the man; my job was to please him, and if I wanted to be pleased, I was a whore. That was the belief that I grew up with," relates Webb's lawyer, BeAnn Sisemore, who wasn't even aware of Texas's dildo law until after she took on Webb's case. Webb's take on modern sex ed reveals that for many women, sexual knowledge hasn't come much further. "I see just from talking with women, they really don't know a whole lot about sex, especially having been so involved in the church for so long; it's just something you're not allowed to talk about," she says in the film. Charges were dropped against Webb in 2004, but fighting them led the Webbs to declare bankruptcy.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sex, orgasm, technology of orgasm, vibrators, sex toys, masturbation

Rachel Kramer Bussel is an author and editor of over a dozen erotic anthologies, most recently Hide and Seek and Crossdressing. She hosts In The Flesh Erotic Reading Series and is a former sex columnist for the Village Voice.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Nanny gov
Posted by: Darkly on Oct 4, 2007 1:38 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It can be very dangerous when governments think they are there to legislate morales. It makes the people in political office your 'parents' whereas you the citizen are nothing but 'children'. where they can send you to 'prison' for 'time out'. We need to face the fact. Adults wont always make right choices.
we need to realize freedom of choice grants you the freedom to make the wrong choice as long as it only affects yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nanny gov Posted by: Intellect
» RE: Nanny gov Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: Nanny gov Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Nanny gov Posted by: drmeow
Banning Vibrators... I never hear about Playboy being banned
Posted by: Einherjar on Oct 4, 2007 1:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Two bits I think deserve commentary:

"Who was in power at the time? Men. The feminist movement was picking up power, and it was all very threatening."

Was in power at the time? I know that at the last White Male Supremacist Patriarchal Capitalist meeting, we felt we were still very much in power! (Yes, I have Hooks) Ok, now that the comedy is out of the way, let me dig in. Women getting off without me being there always angers me... Ok, ok, actually getting serious now.

I think that the general fear of female sexual empowerment is alive and well in the average American male mind. Speaking for all American males is pretty big, so I am going to stick to my country, but looking at pop culture, I feel that I can say the fear of women "turning off the spout" is real. It may manifest in different ways, but it is there. The clothing, pharmaceutical
and fashion industry has really been turning the screws on us men folk in recent decades. "Your fat", "You cannot get it up", "Your naked male insecurity makes me dry as a desert", well, that last one was from a bad date, but I think you get my point. In the great Western cultures of yore (which of course are the only ones that matter right?) Sex has been about MALE pleasure.

American men of my generation or so, have been exposed to the idea from our earliest years that "Scoring" is all that is Man, that women who refuse us are "Bitches" and that women who give in as easily as we want them to are "Sluts". Let's call this the Ultra Man myth. The idea that women should be given equal thrift, that they should get off as much as we do, is blasphemy to the Ultra Man myth. A recipe for disaster in terms of female pleasure in our male dominated world, but hey, I didn't design it that way. With all the suppression and shame that permeates American sex, the last thing it seems many heterosexual men want to deal with is worrying about their female partner's sexual gratification. Which is to say that they worry about it constantly on a subconscious, "I'm not a Real Man" level.

It's my hypothesis that when men who have taken this to heart hear about how great the effects of vibrators are, it causes a massive hemorrhage. A giant hole blows open in the dam they have built up to hold back the flood of self-doubt that stress and culture has built up in them and all that self-hatred starts to flood their minds. Men who pass laws against vibrators want to kill that doubt. They want to put themselves back in a mindset of control. For, if women start controlling their own orgasms, what's next? Controlling their own leisure time? VOTING??!!

Sex, properly done, is a massively creative and empowering force for both genders. It helps the heart, the mind and the spirit. When you are happy, you can start worrying about other people's unhappiness. You might even stop buying as much crap and then the hammers would really start coming down.

"This documentary redefines and clarifies the needs of women's sexual satisfaction. And performance is not the ultimate answer. People should not see the vibrator as a competitor, but rather a member of the team."

Sure. I can buy that. After all, a vibrator cannot hug back(so far)nor can it provide critical feedback or hold your hair back while you puke. Women who are more in touch with themselves, who masturbate often, are much more capable of enjoying themselves during sex in my experience. Plus, it's not always about the almighty O. Sometimes it's just about being that close to another human being. A woman with a partner who cares about her sexual needs is not going to stop sleeping with her partner because she buys a vibrator. On the flip side, a woman with a callous lover who never cares may just find him or herself dumped or divorced when she rediscovers the pleasure that sex can bring. Is that the vibrator's fault?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Crimp
Posted by: GPFrank on Oct 4, 2007 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sure puts a crimp in the confession business.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It would be impossible to calculate
Posted by: Intellect on Oct 4, 2007 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be impossible to calculate how many people have had their sexuality destroyed by organized religions.
Laws such as these emanate from unnatural religious tenets which dictate that sex is for procreation only and should not be enjoyed.

"Life in Lubbock, Texas, taught me two things: One is that God loves you and you're going to burn in hell.
The other is that sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth and you should save it for someone you love."
[Butch Hancock]

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How exactly do such laws get enforced?
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Oct 4, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What constitutes probable cause to get a warrant to search someone's bedroom and count their sex toys? If they don't find realistic plastic penises, can they legally seize electric toothbrush handles, massaging shower heads, and zucchini?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced? Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: How exactly do such laws get enforced? Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
There are LAWS against buying and owning sex toys????????
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 4, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good luck getting democracy!!!!!!



Maybe you could march down to your state governments and have a Mass Wank-A-Thon to protest the laws. (A Mass-Turbation????) ;)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ok, just to recap the Alternet belief system...
Posted by: Q30 on Oct 4, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sex toys = awesome.

Pornography = evil.

This is all neatly encapsulated in one langhable little line: "Who was in power at the time? Men."

BOOOOOOOOOO! HISS!

Stereotyping women is always wrong. Stereotyping men? That's ok.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if she has a good lover
Posted by: richholland on Oct 4, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
why women would use sextools????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if she has a good lover Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» A number of reasons.... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: if she has a good lover Posted by: lepidopteryx
» hahahaha...are you serious? Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Could you clarify something here? Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle
» RE: if she has a good lover Posted by: crooked7
» RE: if she has a good lover Posted by: flower
Words, words, words
Posted by: Spock on Oct 4, 2007 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A woman mov'd is like a fountain troubled, Muddy, ill-seeming, thick, bereft of beauty . . ." How is it that persons who supposedly were for so long forceably deprived and kept ignorant now suddenly profess to know so much about the subject of sex? Having read much of what feminism says about sex and related matters, I find each book written by women concerning sex and related matters much like each of my own sexual encounters with the "fair sex." An orphan reared largely without parent or societal influence upon my sexuality, even my first sexual experiences quickly made it apparent that I was very different both in concept and attitude; more, I was obviously not what my sex partners' experience and knowledge of the sex act led them to expect. I, for instance, didn't (still don't) lose erection after orgasm - with, I suppose (speaking to women who profess to be so ignorant of the subject, I have to wonder), the obvious effect. When, experimenting a few years ago with the dating sites, my "profile" said "eight inches that stays hard orgasm after orgasm," the add received 128 responses the first week. Frankly, less than a dozen times in my life have I met a woman who had anything but an enormously warped concept of the proceative act. Among feminists, the condition was far worse that among their "ignorant" and "unempowered" sisters. Ladies, "methinks thou doest protest too much." More, you may be your own worst enemy. You may, in fact, get what you seem to say you want.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Words, words, words Posted by: deltadancer
» lol Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Words, words, words Posted by: morticia
» RE: Words, words, words Posted by: Einherjar
» RE: Words, words, words Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: Words, words, words Posted by: Einherjar
GLAD THAT'S CLEARED UP
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 4, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every now and then someone writes genuine crap just to get a reaction. You know, how silly can I be and still be taken seriously. In the 60's it was popular to have "theories" about everything. They were shared and argued about over extremely bad coffee in some dive in Greenwich Village. Now they're all cleaned up and the 'espresso' is $7 a cup. And be careful what you say. And so we're reduced to meaningful discussion about vibrators. What fun! Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not to be a spoilsport, but...
Posted by: Chickensh*tEagle on Oct 4, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...sex toys aren't necessarily an unmitigated good:

http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2005/12/06/gertz/

That's from back before it all hit the fan about imported toys with lead paint and pet food with melamine.

I doubt things have gotten better since then; if Congress or the state legislatures had "tried to make America safe for dildos," we sure would have heard about it from the rightwingers.

You gotta be careful about what you put in any orifice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not to be a spoilsport, but... Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD
Posted by: gellero on Oct 4, 2007 9:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Funny how many of the posters on this site would ban the porn men use to get off, but if the tools THEY need are banned, well, that's another story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: LeeAnnG
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: YogiBear
» IT'S ACTING Posted by: gellero
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: Aussie Kim
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: dogman44
» RE: FEMINIST DOUBLE STANDARD Posted by: abbadon2007
Texas, again
Posted by: cocozane on Oct 4, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
gotta love that state; you actually don't need to move to any of the "axis of evil" states to be reminded of where "woman's place" is. What's next? Texas-style burqas?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the Texas legislators??
Posted by: gellero on Oct 4, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Texas has PLENTY of 'liberated and liberal' female legislators. BLAME THEM FOR THIS ANACHRONISM !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Famous old saying comes to mind...
Posted by: MTguy on Oct 4, 2007 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most gals would rather be tickled to death
than poked to death...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Southern idiots outlaw these things
Posted by: Jasonix on Oct 4, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The laws against these things in some southern states are the most moronic pieces of legislation ever written. Is there some way that an enterprising activist can publish the names of the state legislators who wrote and voted for these bills on the web with contact information, so these people can be thoroughly mocked and humiliated as the fools they are? It's time that small-time thugs like these state reps be treated with the disrespect and disdain that they deserve.

Whose morality do these idiots think they're trying to legislate, anyway? I know that Baptists - even the Southern ones - officially leave these types of moral grey areas to the individual to decide. (Want to use a vibrator on your wife? I'm afraid the Bible doesn't say much about that, or about masturbation, either, so you'll just have use your own good sense - at least if you're a Baptist.) Most folks in Texas and Alabama belong to either the Baptist or closely-related evangelical churches. These idiots in the state legislatures are asserting their own moral judgments over that of the individual despite the absolute silence of the Bible on this matter - and that's as much a violation of the south's dominant religious tradition as it is the right of people to own vibrators.

But, of course, people are mostly sick, craven little creeps who need authority figures to tell them what to do, and who can't manage to think for themselves. Even if a religion starts relatively enlightened, like the Baptists, it'll become a totalitarian cesspool if you give it enough time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HaHa
Posted by: frantaylor on Oct 4, 2007 10:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife is very grateful that they can't outlaw my tongue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ixnay on the onguetay!!!! Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: HaHa Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: HaHa Posted by: lepidopteryx
» I know... Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: I know... Posted by: drmeow
» RE: I know... Posted by: abbadon2007
» RE: I know... Posted by: lepidopteryx
Yawn
Posted by: Phenix on Oct 5, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes yes the evil men have held down female sexual exploration. One day I would love for feminist to stop bitching about men and look at the big picture. Sexual exploration is frowned upon in conservative Christian circles so it is no surprise that dildos are banned. As is sodomy. In case you were not aware of this there are plenty of hetero males that like to be pegged. Never done it myself if you are ever in a sex shop look at the strap ons.

So, women do not know where their g-spot is and some don't even know where to find their clit. I hope I find one of those girls, it'll be a lot of fun. But fewer women know that their clit is the head of a penis and their gspot is the female equivalent of the prostrate.

O and if a woman is reading this. Men are more than their cock. It might be a surprise but our bodies are actually EXTREMELY similar and this includes the erogenous zones. Many women like to feel special as if they are the only ones who can feel pleasure. Its a lie.

Wait I'm sorry, the Progressive movement helped ban all things fun. The Progressive movement brought us so many horrible things yet people look so fondly on this movement.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yawn Posted by: TheNamelessCity
We don't know we're alive...
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Oct 7, 2007 11:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
try being female in Congo

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SEX TOYS!! All very interesting but what has it to do with Iran, Israel, the USS Liberty or da Jooz?
Posted by: yellow on Oct 10, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just kidding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]