Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Teens Often Use Cellphones For Stalking More Than Safety

By Stacy Teicher, Christian Science Monitor. Posted February 13, 2007.


Communication technology can facilitate teen dating abuse, enabling obsessive and controlling behavior.
Advertisement

For teens, cellphones are an essential tool for everything from social networking to video games. For parents, knowing their child has a cellphone provides a sense of security. But for a substantial number of teens who are dating, communications on cellphones and computers are taking a turn toward obsession and abuse.

It's a side of kids' social lives that many parents aren't aware of, according to a study released last week by Liz Claiborne Inc. In partnership with the National Domestic Violence Hotline, the company has also just launched loveisrespect.org, the first national website and 24-hour help line that specifically addresses teen dating abuse.

In the survey, conducted by Teenage Research Unlimited, 20 to 30 percent of teens who had been in relationships said their partner had constantly checked in on them, had harassed or insulted them, or had made unwanted requests for sexual activity, all via cellphones or text messages. One out of 4 reported hourly contact with a dating partner between midnight and 5 a.m. -- in some cases, 30 times per hour. And 1 out of 10 had received physical threats electronically. A much smaller percentage of parents reported that their teens had had such experiences.

"Dating violence has always had this core feature ... of trying to control the thoughts, feelings, and actions of another person," says Julie Kahn, program director of the Transition House Dating Violence Intervention Program in Cambridge, Mass. "When you add the technological piece, there are more ways to track someone, to keep someone on an 'electronic leash,' if you will."

Ms. Kahn has frequently heard teens say that their boyfriend or girlfriend gave them a cellphone with prepaid minutes; one couple recently told her that to show their love, they've swapped Web-page passwords. Her group encourages young people to reflect more on what's appropriate at various stages of a relationship, how to establish boundaries, and to honor their own sense of independence.

Loveisrespect.org offers teens information about how to form good relationships -- and recognize warning signs of abuse.

"A lot of young people ... they're just going with what their friends might say or what they might see on the media," says Nathaniel Cole, a sophomore at the University of Maryland and a member of the youth task force that helped launch the initiative.

"The website explains what a healthy relationship is, so it's helping to combat these negative images," says Mr. Cole, who is also a member of Men Can Stop Rape, a nonprofit in Washington.

The website features live, secure chats with trained peers and professionals, who can offer advice and referrals to local resources. It also offers guidance for parents and friends of teens who appear to be in an abusive dating situation.

Had such a site been available for Kendrick Sledge, she might have made a quicker exit from her first relationship, a four-month ordeal when she was 14.

"We started officially dating through Instant Messenger," she recalls on a break between classes at Boston University. Her boyfriend was a senior at a different high school, but she had met him at summer camp and was new to the area, so her world revolved around him. Her parents objected and tried to cut off their communication. "They shut down my e-mail with a password [but didn't know] I opened a free e-mail account," she says. "At one point he offered to buy me my own cellphone. Luckily I never took him up on that."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: technology, teens, abuse, dating, cell phones

Stacy Teicher is a staff writer for The Christian Science Monitor

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The more things improve for women...
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Feb 13, 2007 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the more demented their rhetoric grows. Stalking by cell phone? Hasn't anyone told these technologically incompetent girls that the things have an OFF button?

The women's movement has been hijacked by a small group of chronically offended feminists who believe that women are from Venus and men are from Hell. Ideological movements are generally movements of the gullible led by the manipulative, and the DV industrial complex is no exception. The feminist movement can be regarded as a religious social club where women are encouraged to gather in secret for the purpose of hating men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOLOLOLOLOL Posted by: Allison
» RE: LOLOLOLOLOL Posted by: MAD
» Um no... Posted by: Allison
» RE: LOLOLOLOLOL Posted by: polyquat50
» RE: The more things improve Posted by: zipper696
» Oh, no! It's just YOU ... Posted by: AdamSelene40
» YAAAAAWN Posted by: MAD
» Why be so sexist? Posted by: dnaylor
Brats
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Feb 13, 2007 2:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Entire generations of teenagers have survived without cell phones. They are not an "essential tool".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Brats Posted by: polyquat50
» Please. Posted by: kepstein7777
I think some congratulations are in order, don't you?
Posted by: MAD on Feb 13, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the progressive media handed out awards for the most absurd, no, idiotic pieces of journalistic refuse, this little beauty would walk away the MVP - hands down. I mean, is this kind of crap newsworthy? Even for Alternet, what with its gritty pieces on Japanese 10-step programs for the romantically challenged, this seems pretty dismal.

riiing, riiing

Operator: "Hello - loveisrespect.org. No woman should endure text abuse - how can we assist you today?"

Julie: "My boyfriend texted me late last night after the bar closed. It said 'I wanna knock the coochie lining out that thing girl'. I'm so scared he's going to knock the coochie lining out! What should I do?"

Operator: "You need to contact Patricia Ireland, the National Guard, our local chapter of Women Helping Imprison Men Permanently or WHIMP and The National Institute for the Eternal Treatment of Women as Children."

Julie: "Thank you so much for your help. I'm just a girl and wouldn't normally know how to deal with the trauma and emotional scarring that results from 'violent texting'. Ordinarily I would have just dumped the guy, but I am only 17, and I kinda got used to him text-thrashing me. I actually thought I deserved it!! I'm so ashamed!"

Operator: "There, there Julie. Things are already looking up. With the new text stalking laws on the books, that disgusting mongrel you call a boyfriend will be safely locked away. Now, about our $2.99 a minute charge . . . "

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Where does it say Posted by: MatthewSavage
» RE: Where does it say Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Where does it say Posted by: MatthewSavage
God, these comments are offensive...
Posted by: xenacat on Feb 13, 2007 6:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this article isn't even feminist in tone - it deals with teenagers learning about acceptable dating behavior. Do you guys doing the misgynist postings have any kind of life? or do you just sit in front of your computer screens constantly surfing for progressive sites to post idiotic ramblings? The interesting thing is that ya'll don't change anything with this shit. I don't know, maybe it makes you feel important...sure as hell doesn't scare anyone off from being feminist, progressive or just thinking you guys are half witted creeps.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Learn to read
Posted by: g on Feb 13, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The first couple of comments show two things:
1. The posters obviously can't read very well. The article does not say that controlling and stalking behavior are *caused* by technology, but that they *may be facilitated* by it. Which is stating the obvious, of course: the whole point of technology is to facilitate. Duh.
2. (sigh, I can't believe I have to say this, it's so obvious it hurts) Yes, these young men and women (the article should have made it clear that men can be victims of stalking too-though statistics show it's overwhelmingly women) have an "off" button on their cell phone. And yes, they can dump the controlling partner. It all comes down to their *understanding* that someone telling you "If you turn off the cell phone or stop doing everything I tell you, that means you don't love me" is a form of abusive behavior, whether it's from your boyfriend or from your mother. I have been there many years ago (no cells involved, thank God) and at the time it did not even occur to me that the boyfriend was a manipulative piece of s*** trying to boost his ego at my expenses. Emotional abusers need therapy themselves, but that does not mean that young women or men should put up with that and pay the damage. Given the quality of the sexual and emotional education most kids receive from their schools, peers, families (not to mention TV and the movies), any little bit of realistic info can help.
Talking of which, I sure hope neither of those posters has a teenage daughter or son.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Learn to read Posted by: JCR
» A dose of your own meds Posted by: MartianBachelor
Gary
Posted by: garyjminter on Feb 13, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take my word for it, girlfriends can be just as controlling and obsessive about "checking up" as boyfriends! I guess it shows they care but it gets a little out of hand sometimes....especially when I'm with my other girlfriends! :>

Sometimes I think cell phones are the invention of the Devil, created to annoy and torment us to death...Often I want to throw the damn thing away to stop annoying calls from people with too much time on their hands....

Yet they are useful in emergencies, and there is always the old "power off" button! The trouble is, your "significant other" will ask you why your cell phone was power off and he/she couldn't check up on you!

Gary

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cut these kids some slack - eh?
Posted by: zipper696 on Feb 13, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lots of macho chest beating on here. Not a little of Fem toughness too. Which is all fine and good but TRY and recall how it was for YOU when you were into your first "serious" relationship. For probably the first time you were adored, cuddled and made to feel special, recall also how so many of those First Loves turned sour and only in retrospect did you realise how you had been victimised and manipulated.

The cellphone is a frightening new weapon in the hands of those who would control others, we ignore it's potential for evildoing at our (or more accurately, our kid's) peril.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Teens under 18 have no sexual thoughts or desires. They are pure.
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Feb 13, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Teens have no sexual thoughts and are not sexually arousing before their 18th birthdays. I know this because I listen to Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh. Now Alternet is promoting pedophilia because it uses teen and sex in the same sentence.

Shame on you Alternet.

I'm reporting you to the National Center for Exploited Children. Your names shall be on milk cartons everywhere. You shall live in infamy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fine Young Christian Agents-In-Training
Posted by: eddie torres on Feb 13, 2007 9:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not the PC movement that is emasculating US society. US society is falling prey to a corporate landscaping strategy that disengages government from its sovereign responsibility to promote the general welfare.

Cellphone stalking and communications tracking are valuable future skill sets. Without practice, how else will America raise the next generation of spies, saboteurs, and internal security agents?

And they won't be working for public agencies or semi-regulated commissions.

Once the US Treasury is bankrupt, America's Fine Young Christian Agents-In-Training will be gathering intelligence and data for corporate security operations that lease sovereignty services to local puppets, regimes, and warlords.

See Iraq for details.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: You must be a frequent loveisrespect.org caller . .
Posted by: cmaciain on Feb 13, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
'BTW, what did your post change exactly, dimwit?'

The same thing yours did, little girl.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cell phone used to surrepiticously photograph 'up skirts' and even
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Feb 13, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
consentual sex acts between people without one party (usually the female) knowing she is being filmed. They also are increasingly used by teens to film fights, gangfights, and random violent attacks (like the 'slap happy' craze in Britian several years ago). These videos of sex or violence are then sent around to others via cell phone messaging and posted online further embarassing the individuals caught on film.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cell phones should be taken away from kids...but not for this reason.
Posted by: rcox on Feb 13, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While the concern about cell phones being used as a harassment tool is certainly legitimate, it's not the biggest potential danger of cell phones. There is a growing body of evidence that electromagnetic waves that are beamed right next to your brain could cause brain tumors, early on-set alzheimers, and other cognitive impairments. It's for this reason some experts say cell phones should not be given to minors, as their brains are still developing. There is still scientific debate on this, but until that debate is resolved, people who use cell phones excessively, or give them to their kids, are unwitting participants in a huge experiment that they might not like the results of years down the line.

Having survived until about a year ago without a cell, I can assure you that cell phones are not "essential" for kids, and are used much more than necessary by adults.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Doubt is our product Posted by: suprmark
RE: You must be a frequent loveisrespect.org caller . .
Posted by: xenacat on Feb 13, 2007 9:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If your post were even half way intelligent and less abusive in nature, I might give it a passing thought. Since your response to my comments isn't much above the level of a pissy eighth grader, I'm merely replying just to raise your hackles a little higher. I'm not offended - just don't think that these kind of slurs should go unanswered. Bullies need to be slapped around a little. Also, a few things come to mind about your post. 1. Are you really female? 2. Did you even read the article throughly? 3. Did you even understand the context of my remarks? 4. Can you disagree in an adult fashion? No, I thought not...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is more luddite panic.
Posted by: kittynboi on Feb 13, 2007 10:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just what I expect from Alternet.


Most phones and phone servics let you block callers.

You can also turn the phone off.

Why aren't these possibilities explored in any depth?

Is the phrase "restraining order" ever used in this article?

This article seems to filled with panic over kids being too stupid to survive, and panic over evil cell phones.

This is just the latest in the never ending march of thinly veiled anti-technology articles that have become far too common on this website.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ditto on that and Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: This is more luddite panic. Posted by: kittynboi
Cellphones ARE NOT the problem and STOP TALKING ABOUT FEMALE VICTIMS ONLY !!!! I WAS SHOT TWICE IN
Posted by: maxpayne on Feb 13, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
school and the first time it was a guy and the second time it was a gal. The stalking shit has been going on long before cell phones came. And let's not forget that men/women hiring hitpeople to do their bidding of killing their parter isn't even talked about. Instead, focus on the fact that parents do not enforce discipline and learning. Add to it, the FUCKED UP EDUCATION system in America offers NO ROOM for actually teaching and testing students on discipline and our society doesn’t teach children basic interpersonal communication skills or how to make relationships work. Children are pretty much left to figure out how to socially function on their own, and coupled with the starkly different expectations and socialization of girls and boys, this can lead to huge communication gaps between the sexes that create such a huge market for books like Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus.

Instead of liberals blaming guys and conservatives blaming gals for the mess, it's time to make February a month to teach students mandatory courses in understanding relationships and what Valentine's Day is really supposed to be about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: You must be a frequent loveisrespect.org caller . .
Posted by: babs on Feb 13, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you're a woman? - a girl is more like it katyalynn - perhaps when you grow up, you'll understand things better. Your shrill tone, off topic comments, and pathetic insults give you away.

get back to myspace where you belong, not on websites for adults. Aren't you late for school? Grade 8 is hard, better get going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the study
Posted by: bambino on Feb 13, 2007 12:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i dont believe this study. one in four? who did they test and how many. for whose benefit is this really. perhaps the liz claiborne dress shop. i dont like young boys already referred to as abusers. this is so destructive. what is a 14 year old girl doing in such an intense relationship talking like a 30 year old. but basically the language of abusive relationships has no place in a high school setting. these kids should not be given the same advice as handed out to more adult relationships of abuse. i want a better study. and i really feel uncomfortable with all the social support apparatus that seems to spring up out of nowhere. this smells of exploitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You don't know what you re talking about
Posted by: jesseeos1 on Feb 13, 2007 1:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My daughter has had to change her cell phone number multiple times in the last month because of harrassment from an ex. Cell phones aren't the problem but a just another way to access a person 24/7. The off button just means other people can't call you. Getting threatening text messages is very upsetting. Number blocking is easy to get around. Restraining orders are easy to get around. When someone gets obsessed with you they usually can get around anything and where a cel phone should be a tool to keep you safe it becomes a tool to harass you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just went to the site in article
Posted by: kathat on Feb 13, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And I couldn't enter until i exed out a box warning people that 'their computers can be monitered' and urging you to 'click here' to test your computer. So some a__hole somewhere is victimizing whatever teens go to the site and don't know enough NOT to click the button. What a world, what a world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where were her parents?
Posted by: tjohnson on Feb 13, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that it is sad that, at 14 years old, Kendrick Sledge couldn't talk to her parents about an 18 year old boy that was bothering her. What does that say about the level of communication between her and her parents? I know teens don't always tell their parents everything, but as a parent, frankly I want to know who my daughter is talking to and hanging out with, regardless of her age!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So, we're supposed to be wary of/hate/detest/decry...
Posted by: mmeetoilenoir on Feb 13, 2007 2:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-cell phones
-Whole Foods
-organic farming, if the farm's too big
-flying in airplanes
-women who drink in bars (who can forget THAT gem?)
-anything smacking of any variety of spirituality
-homeownership

I know I'm forgetting some. Could someone give me some more things that I'm supposed to hate, according to this site?

It's hard being a good Liberal, y'all! *sigh*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amusing
Posted by: Phenix on Feb 13, 2007 8:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is just an amusing topic that only topically addresses what is possibly a serious problem in American teenage life. Online stalking and cell phone stalking are both real and most likely prevalent in our society. The author does not do a very good job explaining the magnitude of the problem and instead writes about 22 year old who works with a corporate giant. She also seems to just plug that site "LoveisRespect" which is pretty silly.

I come from a royally fucked up family life but I had friends who I would tell about my girlfriend. Look somewhere and somehow your kids will have to learn how to deal with life. I would prefer that you as a parent teach your kids about respect and boundaries. Another impersonal ngo will not save your kid from abuse and if it does then you are still a failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Feb 13, 2007 10:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a moronic article, in no way "progressive," that employs the usual wildly exaggerated scare-measures to misrepresent teenage life as apocalyptically dangerous--all in service to interest groups and private profiteers' agendas. (How many adults have been invited to "unwanted sexual activity" via telephone--95%?). And did these "teen dating" interests and "experts" bother to survey how many teens in abusive relationships come from the several million homes where parents are violent and abusive? Of course not--that would have been too "real," and blaming teens and cellphones is much more popular and fun. Now, here's an interesting fact--EVERY reliable measure we have (national crime victimization surveys, FBI reports, public health statistics, school surveys, you name it) shows massive declines in violence, especially sexual violence, against teenage girls and by teenage boys over the last decade. In fact, rape and other sexual violence levels among teens are at their lowest levels ever recorded. That no one mentions these amazing, youth-affirming trends shows just how much our mainstream and so-called alternative media views of young people are dominated by interest groups that thrive on creating constant, unwarranted, mind-numbing fear.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]