yoga mat chemical in food

Trump's wild hair spawns wild theories

President Donald Trump has long been famous for his blonde locks, which supporters tend to describe as natural and detractors usually claim are somehow fake. The president, who reportedly uses the hair restoration medicine finasteride, unintentionally gave the latter camp’s argument a boost in the immediate aftermath of his recent Las Vegas rally, an event at which Trump’s hair made a surprise appearance.

“President Donald Trump’s appearance in Las Vegas on Wednesday has given way to speculation about a possible hair boost, with people on social media noting the president had particularly thicker-looking hair during his speech,” reported Forbes’ Antonio Pequeño IV on Thursday. “Photos taken of Trump during the speech at Red Rock Casino Resort appear to show a more full and colorful hairstyle than recent public appearances.”

Pequeño added, “Some users on X questioned if Trump was wearing a wig, with supporters using the appearance to praise his look.”

According to Pequeño, Trump’s hair appeared to be a comb-over but had also been seemingly thinner when he met with reporters aboard Air Force One on the previous Sunday.

“Trump has a weave!!” former Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-ILL) tweeted, according to Pequeño, who added that “Kinzinger made the comment while reposting a photo from the Democratic Party’s official X account showing Trump’s seemingly thinner hair in the recent past.”

During that same rally, Trump seemingly admitted that his war against Iran had caused oil prices to go up, although he at the same time has previously denied that affordability is an issue in America at all.

“When oil goes down, and it's going to go down very rapidly and is already happening, we may have to send it up again, we may have to -- you know what happens when we send it up,” Trump told the audience of supporters. “But we don't have to. But when that oil and gasoline go down, everything else follows. But we have done a great job at reducing prices and we have done an unbelievable job in making our country really, really respected and successful again.”

Trump’s hair is so well-known that one of his ongoing biographers, journalist/author Michael Wolff, argued last year that Trump’s hair helped him win reelection in 2024.

Describing former President Joe Biden, Wolff said that “he looks gray. He's washed-out. You know, his hair is — what's left of it — is gray. The skin is gray. The suits are gray. And Trump would point out, 'Look at him. Nobody even sees him. Everybody notices me.' Which is absolutely true."

Wolff added, "And side by side, you know, who do you notice? You notice this guy — this appalling-looking guy who is Donald Trump, and not just the relatively normal old man-looking guy that Biden was."

His hair is an integral part of that, Wolff continued.

Inside the Supreme Court's favorite new tool to wipe out modern laws

When rationalizing its alarming injection of politics into legal decision, conservatives on the John Roberts Supreme Court are dumping years of legal analysis and precedent in favor of historical arguments. In essence, legal theory appears to be taking back seat to what law in America used to look like, says Florida International University philosophy Associate Professor Eric Scarffe.

They’re using history, said Scarffe, to do what judicial philosophy long has not: remove judgment from judging.

“Rather than promoting judicial restraint, … key cases reveal how the ‘history and tradition test’ has been weaponized to enable one of the most radical revisions to this nation’s constitutional order since the New Deal,” argued Scarffe. “It has been used not only to overturn previous decisions and precedent, but also to fundamentally shift the way the Court engages in judicial review.”

Courts traditionally weigh interests, assess evidence, and openly confront competing constitutional values. But cases like the Wolford v. Lopez, which the court used to strike down Hawaii’s restrictions on carrying firearms on private property that is open to the public, the court made a decision based entirely upon whether a sufficiently similar restriction existed at some point during the nation’s founding.

This can be used to kill a lot of good laws, considering many of them did not exist at the nation’s founding. In Dobbs v. Jackson, for example, the Court did not ask whether abortion restrictions infringed upon choices central to dignity and autonomy, said Scarffe.

“Rather, it asked whether a constitutional right to abortion was deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition. The Court’s answer, of course, was that it was not.”

Scarffe argues that it’s hard to escape the conclusion that this is the point very point of employing the history test.

“First, if we take the history and tradition test to its logical conclusion, more than just abortion rights are at stake. Indeed, it seems unlikely that you would find deeply rooted in this nation’s history rights to the use of contraceptives, gay marriage, interracial marriage, or even the idea that rights articulated in the Constitution place limits on state governments (as opposed to just the federal government),” said Scarffe.

Second, Scarffe said the history and tradition test is no longer being used by the Court to step lightly on so-called unenumerated rights not written into the Constitution, like abortion or physician-assisted suicide. Rather, it is being used to declare unconstitutional laws passed by the federal or state governments, like the Voting Rights Act or Hawaii’s gun legislation.

“Far from being a tool to let states decide for themselves, this past term the history and tradition test has morphed into a tool for the conservative majority to overturn progressive precedent and progressive legislation,” warned Scarffe. “The Court, in short, is making perhaps its strongest case to date for the need for its reform, should Democrats take back the House this fall — for if the Court now claims authority to strike down any legislation that does not fit its politics, there appear to be few other choices left.”

Inside the Trump trick: The trillion-dollar potential hoax behind new drama

You may have read of President Donald Trump's mounting fury at news that he and his administration have depleted precious U.S. munitions with his entirely self-created debacle in Iran, but what if the “embarrassing” news wrecking the White House was just a subtle ploy? The American Prospect reports that voters and fiscal hawks should not ignore the possibility that the White House and the compulsive liar within are manipulating news for their own ends.

“… [M]ilitary sources spilled to Reuters that the U.S. has now wasted ‘virtually all’ of its long-range and defensive missile stockpile, launching strikes and downing Iranian drone attacks on regional bases and allies,” reports American Prospect writer Zachary Groz. “Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded on social media, saying, ‘We don’t hate the Fake News media enough,’ after CNN picked up the story.”

The Pentagon held what NBC News called a “crisis meeting” about the issue, and the Washington Post followed up with a claim that Trump lit into his defense secretary over the missing missiles, even as he denied claims of a shortage as fake news.

But analysts say if you want to spot the real location of the pea hiding under the sliding cup look no further than the money.

Democratic senators recently deep-sixed a vote on the administration’s ghastly $1.15 trillion military spending request, combined with a separate $350 billion package proposed by the White House through reconciliation. They also killed rule proposals to fast-track military contract acquisitions, and potentially quadruple missile production.

But Groz said talk of a shortage could make Dems’ blockade hard to sustain, “forcing lawmakers to sign a blank check for an aggressive war they never authorized and for future campaigns they may have no say in, all to stave off an actual crisis.”

“The administration is manufacturing false urgency around the missile shortage to build political will for more defense spending, which is what the president wanted long before he started this war,” said Julia Gledhill, a research analyst for the National Security Reform Program at the Stimson Center. “It’s all part and parcel of a broader effort to lean increasingly on rapid acquisition pathways, which have fewer requirements around cost and pricing data, around competition, and therefore are less accountable, and hinder congressional oversight.”

In testimony to the House Oversight Committee earlier this summer, Gledhill pointed to structural problems in defense contracting that allows Trump to “run wild with discretionary spending on weapons, should it be granted 50 percent more budget to do so.”

Trump adores no-bid contract like the one that led to his disastrous Reflecting Pool. Now he wants an exception to ordinary contracting rules for the military, known as “Other Transaction Authority,” or an OTA — which are designed as a way for the federal government to bypass standard competition and cost comparison regulations.

Gledhill said the Pentagon has already multiplied its expenditure through the contracting vehicle tenfold between 2016 and 2024, up to $18 billion in 2024. Now Trump wants more … much more, and Congress is in a hard place to deny him.

“Congress may have no good moves left between dangerously depleted stockpiles and carte blanche for a war with no endgame,” Groz wrote.

Trump's plot crumbles as 21st court defeat demolishes his election scheme

President Donald Trump lost his 21st court case in his attempts to rig the midterm elections through various voter suppression methods. He has not prevailed a single time.

"A California court dealt Republicans a major defeat Thursday, rejecting their bid to soften the official description of an anti-voting measure and preserving ballot language warning that it would bar citizens from voting unless they present government-issued identification," wrote Democracy Docket's Yunior Rivas on Thursday. "The decision is a significant win for California voters seeking clear information about how the measure could prevent eligible ballots from being counted."

Rivas added, "Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Jennifer K. Rockwell denied the GOP-backed petition Thursday, ruling that Attorney General Rob Bonta’s title, summary and label accurately describe Proposition 39 and fall within his legal authority to prepare ballot materials."

Republicans attempted to rationalize their measure, Proposition 39, by arguing that it would not actually stop voters from casting ballots, but instead make sure that they had complied with voter ID requirements before that ballot could be counted. Judge Rockwell begged to differ.

“Petitioners’ contention that Proposition 39 would not prohibit “voting” because it may allow the submission of ballots that will not be counted is inconsistent with the settled understanding of what it means to ‘vote,’” Rockwell explained in her decision. “Because Proposition 39 would prohibit the counting of ballots not submitted in compliance with the identification requirements, there is nothing misleading or inaccurate about the statement that the measure ‘prohibits citizens from voting unless they present government-issued identification.’”

Trump has lost all of his voter suppression attempts in court, including those cases that appeared before other Republican judges. in lieu of prevailing in court, Trump has threatened to use the Department of Homeland Security and other federal law enforcement agencies to meddle in elections, which are constitutionally delegated to the purview of the states.

Expert: Trump’s golf game predicts his behavior everywhere else

President Donald Trump is reportedly a massive golf cheat, at least according to a prominent sportswriter discussing the sport that the president has played for more than 26 percent of the days of his second term.

"He's got a pancake swing and the yips — that's when you just can't commit to the shot, and you suddenly flinch," Rick Reilly, author of "Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump," told MS NOW Ari Melber on Thursday. "He chips like Edward Scissorhands. He's just awful, especially around the green. He hits it pretty well off the tee, but when he plays his own courses, he's got a caddy who'll toss it out of the rough or out of the bunker for him. One time I saw him hit it into the lake, and suddenly he's on the fairway. I said, 'What the hell, Donald?' And he said, 'It must have hit the tee marker.'"

Reilly added, "There's no beating him at his own course, because nobody wants to get thrown out of the club. It's kind of like when you race your three-year-old in a foot race and say, 'You won"'— because nobody wants to be the one who ruins it."

Melber then asked Reilly, "We got video from last year showing a caddy dropping a ball closer to the green. But the bigger question — what did you assess years ago that this said about the man who would go on to become president of the United States?"

Reilly replied by keeping the subject about sports, not politics.

"Look, I don't know about politics, but I do know golf," Reilly told Melber. "Golf is like bicycle shorts — it reveals a lot about a man. If he's going to cheat you at golf, is he going to cheat his friends and family? He's going to cheat the country. He's going to cheat in elections. He's going to cheat on his wives and his taxes. In fact, we've asked him, 'You can't cheat me like this,' and he said, 'Well, I cheat on my wives, I cheat on my taxes — why wouldn't I cheat on my own golf course?' That's how it works."

Reilly has previously called out Trump's controversial behavior about golf. Earlier this week, Reilly posted on X that Trump has "f---" up everything, using golf as an example.

“Reflecting pool was fine," Reilly posted on X. "Now it's fenced off. Kennedy Center was fine. Now it's closed. WH was fine. Now it looks like a 99-cent Thai joint. Boats sailed thru Hormuz. Now Iran owns it. Golf was cool. Now there's a greasy orange splotch on it.”

Reilly is not alone in raising alarms about Trump's golf-related behavior. In July, it was revealed that one of Trump's golf courses has been dinged by health inspectors for various violations.

“When a Loudoun County health official visited the Trump National Golf Club Washington D.C.’s restaurant last month, the inspector spotted some invaders,” NOTUS' Dave Levinthal reported on Monday. The issues included a “large quantity of small flies” at a storage room and possible health hazards included “several food items stored at a temperature above the required 41 degrees Fahrenheit minimum. That included the blue cheese (54 degrees), sausage links (51 degrees), sausage patties (49 degrees) and pasta (49 degrees).” Additionally, the report found improperly stored “raw steak, fish and burgers above ready-to-eat foods such as tortillas and sauces.” and that the sink’s chemical sanitizer solution exceeded regulations for maximum strength level.”

In February, NOTUS also reported that Trump has been renovating Washington DC's public golf courses in ways that are making them unaffordable to all but the most affluent golfers. Trump furthered this plan by terminating the National Links Trust's lease, citing violations they dispute.

“The National Links Trust is devastated by the Trump administration’s decision to terminate our 50-year lease with the National Park Service,” the National Links Trust declared in a statement. “Since taking over stewardship of Rock Creek, East Potomac, and Langston courses five years ago, NLT has consistently complied with all lease obligations as we work to ensure the brightest possible future for public golf in DC.”

Judge breaks silence on death threats and doxxing amid White House attacks

President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked judges who rule against him by accusing them of being traitors and threats to America. Perhaps as he anticipated, his supporters have taken his rhetoric as a call to intimidate those same judges, from falsely reporting that a judge killed his wife and threatening judges with violence to vowing to commit sexual assault against them and harassing their family members.

Now one of those judges is speaking out against the bullying.

“It's not an easy thing for any of us to come forward and talk about the personal threats,” Judge John J. McConnell Jr., the Chief Justice of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, told MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace on Thursday. “It's also not an easy thing for us to come forward as judges, because you all work on... There is an unprecedented amount of personal attacks against judges — not just me, but all across the country. It's systematic, it's growing, it's severe. There are sustained efforts.”

He added, “There are, in my opinion, results of sustained efforts by high-level members of the executive branch who have called judges rogue, insurrectionists, radicals, haters, moneyed, lunatics, corrupt, vicious. And this constant personal attack on my fellow district judges and myself and our families is the beginning of the attack on equal justice under the law, according to the rule of law.”

He continued, “My story is not unique — it's disturbing, but it's not unique. I received six or seven credible death threats. My daughter was doxxed by Laura Loomer and by Elon Musk. I have a picture of myself on a wanted poster made by a congressman. Ethics complaints were filed against me, and some of the attacks were against my wife — certainly not a public figure. And so that level of personally attacking judges by a co-equal branch of government is detrimental to our democracy as we know it.”

He later told Wallace that this is not “a partisan issue.”

“We had Democratic members of the Senate speak inappropriately about judges, using deceptive language,” McConnell told Wallace. What we're seeing right now, out of the executive branch, appears to be an attempt to delegitimize the courts, to delegitimize judges. The Deputy Attorney General — who's potentially in line to be the Attorney General — said we're at war with the courts, and called people to action. These kinds of things are not acceptable in a democratic society when we follow the law.”

McConnell is not alone among jurists warning that Trump’s rhetoric against judges is meant to undermine the judiciary. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson made a similar comment in 2025.

“The attacks are not random,” Jackson said. “They seem designed to intimidate. The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law.”

https://youtu.be/5KoNEZF_td0

Trump’s digital empire is rotting from the inside out as MAGA slinks away

The Financial Times reports President Donald Trump’s Truth Social media platform is bleeding users as the unpopular president plays out the second year of his White House return.

Kevin McGurn, interim chief executive of Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) told Financial Times that Truth Social does not disclose numbers. However, digital market intelligence company Similarweb estimates the platform had about 261,000 daily active users for its mobile app in July — down from more than 436,000 that same month last year.

“The low numbers relative to rivals such as X have led to questions about how sustainable the platform will be, especially after Trump stands down as president,” reports Financial Times. “… Part of [its] original mission has been usurped by X — popular among many rightwing commentators.

However, The New York Sun reports news publications “built on harvesting clicks from MAGA supporters are fading as President Trump begins his final act in American politics,” and their web traffic “is falling across the board."

MAGA sites’ success appears to still be inextricably connected to Trump — and they’re not doing well in Trump’s twilight months. This may include Trump’s own site.

“The trend is lending credence to the president’s prediction that the press will miss him when he’s gone, with those who advocate for his movement hardest hit,” reports the Sun, adding that an analysis by Similarweb found that a whopping 90 percent of the top right-wing sites saw drops in visits between May 2025 and May 2026.

Additionally, the Sun reports “when a team is losing, fans tune out, choosing to spend time on pursuits less aggravating than endless, post-game obituaries.”

“Putting [Trump’s] name in a headline will no longer be enough to earn a windfall of clicks,” the Sun explains, adding that The Pew Research Center reported the percentage of podcasts has doubled from 2020. This means “there are more publications than ever chasing a shrinking audience for MAGA content.”

Last month, Trump attempted to save the platform by proposing TMTG’s controversial launch of a premium version of Truth Social designed to share inside information with Wall Street firms. The service offers early access to Trump’s posts on the platform for an asking price of $100,000 per month.

But Financial Times reports several Wall Street types are claiming to be offended by the “extreme asking price for early access to potentially market-altering events, with one calling it ‘scandalous.’”

Several Wall Street execs have said they do not plan to purchase the premium version of the platform, reports the Times, but there is likely no way of confirming for sure if they plan to benefit from Truth Social’s exclusive plan benefits in secret.

Meanwhile, Financial Times reports TMTG shares "have sunk 39 per cent over the past year," linked to the price of bitcoin, which makes up the majority of a $2.5 billion investment in crypto and other assets that acts as its corporate treasury.

"TMTG reported a net loss of $712.3 million in 2025, mostly from changes in the value of digital assets given an annual revenue of just $3.7 million," the Times said.

Republican states hit by crisis of Trump's own making: insider

There is a growing food crisis across the U.S. due to President Donald Trump’s cuts to the SNAP program, with the hardest hit states being those that are “traditionally Republican.”

This is according to former Treasury advisor Steve Rattner, who on Thursday shared data from the USDA showing that participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program had plunged by 5 million people over the course of Trump's second term. “Over 5 million low-income Americans — including at least 1.5 million children — have lost access to food assistance due to Trump's SNAP cuts last year,” Rattner explained. “Most of the hardest hit states are traditionally Republican, resulting in growing hunger crises in states like Arizona.”

Last year, Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act slashed $186 billion from the SNAP budget over 10 years – the largest reduction in the program’s history. The act also imposed strict work requirements on SNAP participants. For the first time, adults between the ages of 55 and 64 and adults with children over 14 must work at least 20 hours a week or only receive benefits for up to three months over three years. What’s more, there has been a significant increase in the paperwork required, causing bureaucratic bottlenecks, while much of the administrative costs are being shifted from federal to state budgets.

According to Harvard public health policy professor Sara Bleich, “The SNAP program helps more than 42 million Americans buy food each month. That’s one in eight Americans, and 70 percent of those participants are the elderly, disabled, or children. The program is reaching vulnerable populations. When we look at levels of participation by state, we see that there tends to be a higher percentage of participants in the Southern and Southwest parts of the country, largely due to larger populations of families that have lower income.”

The USDA reports that food insecurity is an issue across most of the country, but that it tends to impact red states and counties the most. The states of Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Mississippi, West Virginia, Kentucky, Alabama, Nevada, and New Mexico have the highest rates of food insecurity – eight of which went to Trump in 2024, while Nevada's electors were split. These states have been among some of the hardest hit by Trump’s SNAP cuts.

Rattner has noted other alarming economic signals in recent weeks, such as persistently high inflation, lower-than-expected growth, an exploding national deficit, and a frozen labor market. With the midterms looming and voters overwhelmingly expressing that economic matters are their foremost concerns, Republican candidates have been careful to distance themselves from Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill.

Trump issues ominous warning to the Senate: This could be the end

President Donald Trump has actively and publicly berated Senate Republicans for not repealing the filibuster, a move that he hopes will make it possible for him to pass the SAVE America Act and thereby make it harder for Democrats to vote. Now he has a new move in his rhetoric repertoire to achieve this result — namely, citing the recent nomination of Dr. Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan as the Democratic candidate there for the US Senate.

"For our Great Republican Senators, friends of mine 'all,' please be advised that the Communist Dumocrat Senate Candidate from Michigan, Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed, is touting, as perhaps his single most important point, the Termination of the Filibuster," Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social. "I watched yesterday, and he’s gone Termination CRAZY. If he succeeds, the Dumocrats will gain 4 Senators, 8 Congressmen, many Electoral and Popular Votes, a stacked Supreme Court with 23 Justices, and I will be, sadly, despite the great job we are doing, the last Republican President! President DONALD J. TRUMP"

The filibuster allows either party to entirely hold up legislation on the Senate floor by talking indefinitely or filing a motion that is the equivalent thereof. In order for the filibuster to be cancelled by either party on a given occasion, 60 senators must ultimately coalesce behind getting rid of its use — and that only applies to that one vote. A mere majority of senators need to vote to repeal the use of that tactic, but senators are historically loyal to the filibuster because it protects minority rights within the Senate. During President Joe Biden's term, two Democrats — Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Krysten Sinema of Arizona — locked arms to protect the filibuster despite concerns that their doing so would help Republicans stall Biden's agenda. Now a number of Republican senators are doing the same thing: Protecting the filibuster even though Democrats have vowed to use it to thwart the SAVE America Act.

The internal Republican divide highlights a deeper conflict over the future of Senate norms and executive authority. While institutionalists argue that maintaining the 60-vote threshold prevents radical legislative swings when power changes hands, Trump and his closest allies view the rule as an unnecessary block to passing their core agenda.

This friction complicates leadership races following Mitch McConnell's departure, as candidates are forced to choose between traditional Senate protections and total fealty to the executive branch. Ultimately, the fight over the SAVE America Act has transformed the filibuster from a procedural tactic into a definitive ideological purity test.

Trump email threatens voters’ MAGA status if they don't cough up the dough

A Wednesday email blast from President Donald Trump told followers their “supporter status” had been canceled, and it directed them to donate in order to restore their standing in the MAGA movement, according to Mediaite.

Complete with a subject line reading, “I’ve got a massive headache,” the email continued with a purported quote from the president himself.

“YOUR SUPPORTER STATUS HAS BEEN CANCELLED,” the fundraising email announced. A yellow button then promises a “FIANL [sic] CHANCE TO MAKE THIS RIGHT.”

“The thought of losing you makes my head hurt,” the purported Trump quote claims. “I know you would never intend to cancel your journey with the MAGA Movement and me. If you’re still with us, I need you to send me your signature to renew your MAGA Membership before the hour clock runs out.”

“Although the email claims to require only a ‘signature,’ the button redirects users to a page imploring for fiscal gifts.

Mediaite reports Trump’s fundraising schemes are under increased scrutiny in recent weeks. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that the president has deeply involved himself in his political fundraising operation. This includes personally reviewing donor lists, urging aides to seek larger contributions, and encouraging requests that can reach tens of millions of dollars, according to WSJ.

According to the report, Trump’s aggressive fundraising network has brought in more than $800 million since he returned to office little more than a year ago. The money allegedly supports projects ranging like his White House ballroom, his presidential library and political committees and initiatives tied to the nation’s 250th anniversary.

According to the WSJ several business leaders were convinced that large donations got top billing regarding White House access.

Trump’s spokeswoman Danielle Alvarez denied that allegation, however, calling Trump “the most successful fundraiser in modern political history” and insisting, “President Trump can’t be bought.”

Trump’s family wealth has exploded since his return to office, thanks to cryptocurrency schemes and other tactics, including his bid to sell exclusive Truth Social access inside information for $100K a year.

“There is no plausible defense of Trump's TruthSocial scheme,” declared National Review Senior Editor Charles Cooke. “It is flagrantly corrupt. It is impeachable. Congress should intervene. (It won't, I know.)”

IRS workers sue over Trump 'slush fund' claiming a hidden legal trap

President Donald Trump's administration is being sued by a group of IRS workers because they claim his $1.776 billion slush fund for his supporters, by including a requirement that neither Trump nor his family ever be audited, requires them to break the law.

"An organization representing career Internal Revenue Service employees has joined a lawsuit over the contentious settlement reached in connection with President Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS, challenging a carveout that would give him and members of his family immunity from certain tax audits," reported NBC News' Ryan J. Reilly on Thursday. "A Jan. 6 prosecutor fired by the Trump administration and others previously sued to block a fund that could have gone to Trump allies who said they were victims of weaponization, potentially including Jan. 6 rioters. A federal judge then temporarily blocked the fund from moving forward in May."

Reilly added, "Now, an amended version of lawsuit filed in the Eastern District of Virginia on Thursday afternoon alleges that the IRS audit immunity that Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche agreed to for Trump and his family members in connection with the purported settlement is unlawful and unconstitutional. The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), which represents career IRS auditors, has joined the litigation."

In their official filing, the National Treasury Employees Union argued that Trump is lying about canceling the slush fund and that, regardless, the demand that he not be audited is legally unenforceable.

"[The Department of Justice's] concurrent statement about the Immunity Order purports to narrow the scope of that Order but does not rescind it," the case said. "This unsigned piece of paper, which carries no more weight than a press release, confirms that the IRS will terminate tax audits and liability at the request of the President and conscript Plaintiff NTEU members into violating their oath and the Internal Revenue Code to grant the President with an unconstitutional emolument."

The lawsuit places career civil servants at the center of an unprecedented constitutional showdown over executive power and tax compliance. By forcing IRS auditors to grant lifetime immunity, the administration effectively commands them to violate their professional oaths to uphold the tax code equally. Legal experts warn that if the immunity order stands, it establishes a dangerous double standard, transforming a federal agency into a political shield. With the National Treasury Employees Union now driving the litigation, the battle moves beyond mere partisan fighting to focus on safeguarding the institutional integrity of the nation's tax system against unprecedented presidential overreach.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.