us troops

Be a Patriot on July 4th and Stop Another U.S. Military Intervention in Iraq

This July 4, the fireworks won’t just be in celebration of Independence Day. There will undoubtedly be fireworks in cities throughout the Middle East, as the region, engulfed in violence, further explodes. The U.S. military and U.S. taxdollars are already deeply entangled in Middle Easterners’ lives (and deaths), and President Obama is under pressure to get further involved in the wars in Iraq and Syria. But what advice would our nation’s founders give the 44th president this July 4?

Keep reading...Show less

Reading the News Is Fun and Patriotic, But It Sure Can Make You Anxious

I guess I shouldn't be surprised that one of the great pleasures of my life—reading the New York Times—is also bad for my health.

Keep reading...Show less

Only 28 Percent of Americans Know Close to 4,000 US Troops Have Died in Iraq War


When last we actually heard any substantial news reporting about Iraq the line was about how "the surge" had reduced violence...and it's effect upon ice cream shops or some such nonsense.



That was sometime in the Fall.


And then...poof, the war occupation, it disappeared.

I know it's vitally important that all news be focused upon a prominent governmental office holder liking to pay for sex -- because THAT'S never happened before and all. I also know there's a Presidential Election on so it's vitally important that the candidates positions be covered for sixty seconds a day and the horse race aspect be for the remaining 23 hours, 59 minutes.

But the occupation still rages, people still die, and $12 billion a month still gets spent over there.

And yet, the occupation is not discussed...at all. And somehow the end result is this:
Twenty-eight percent of the public is aware that nearly 4,000 U.S. personnel have died in Iraq over the past five years, while nearly half thinks the death tally is 3,000 or fewer...
The survey, by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, found that public awareness of developments in the Iraq war has dropped precipitously since last summer, as the news media have paid less attention to the conflict. In earlier surveys, about half of those asked about the death tally responded correctly.

And it's really unfortunate because up until now, the media has done such a fine job on covering Iraq have they not?

KBR Supplied Water Makes US Troops Sick



If they supported the troops any better, they'd be killing them.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Dozens of U.S. troops in Iraq fell sick at bases using "unmonitored and potentially unsafe" water supplied by the military and a contractor once owned by Vice President Dick Cheney's former company, the Pentagon's internal watchdog says.

A report obtained by The Associated Press said soldiers experienced skin abscesses, cellulitis, skin infections, diarrhea and other illnesses after using discolored, smelly water for personal hygiene and laundry at five U.S. military sites in Iraq.

The Pentagon's inspector general found water quality problems between March 2004 and February 2006 at three sites run by contractor KBR Inc., and between January 2004 and December 2006 at two military-operated locations.

It was impossible to link the dirty water definitively to all the illnesses, according to the report. But it said KBR's water quality "was not maintained in accordance with field water sanitary standards" and the military-run sites "were not performing all required quality control tests."

Pentagon Report on Iraq War: 1 In 5 Vets Have "Traumatic Brain Injuries"

On the Chris Matthews Show yesterday morning, Time magazine Managing Editor Richard Stengel discussed a new Pentagon report that says "1 in 5 American servicemen and women who have been in Iraq are coming back with brain injuries." Stengel called it the "real toll" of the war, adding that "the legacy of that will last all of our lifetimes and it's incalculable."

In total, according to Stengel, "more than 250,000 people" are affected by "mild traumatic brain injuries" sustained in Iraq. Watch it to your right.

According to the Pentagon, some of the soldiers who sustained concussions "do not realize they need treatment." Additionally, they may be sent back to the war zone:

Keep reading...Show less

Did An Iraqi Soldier Kill US Troops for Kicking a Pregnant Woman?

Yesterday there were a flurry of reports about an Iraqi soldier shooting and killing two US soldiers during a joint mission. Reported as the first time this has happened, the reports in the American press may tell only half the story.

The rather startled reports repeated assertions that the attack was for "reasons unknown." Iraqi reports say the US soldiers were kicking a pregnant Iraqi woman when shot. Here's what we've been able to learn so far.

On December 26, two American soldiers were killed during a "joint Iraqi-U.S. patrol undertaking security duty in al-Haramat area, western Mosul."

The Multinational Force press office initially reported these deaths on December 28:

Keep reading...Show less

Bush Puts 'Immunity' for Iraqi Government Ahead of Bonuses for American Troops

In November, the Bush administration threatened that if Congress didn't pass the Defense Authorization Bill, it would have to issue furlough notices for up to 150,000 civilian workers at military bases. The Pentagon distributed a document warning that the Army may cease to function if it did not receive the funds.

Congress eventually passed the defense authorization bill before winter recess and President Bush raised no concerns at the time. But over the break, the White House threatened a veto because of language that would expose the Iraqi government "to massive liability in lawsuits concerning the misdeeds of the Saddam Hussein regime."

Ironically, Bush's refusal to sign the bill is leading to the very damaging effects that he was fearmongering about back in November. The Air Force Times reports that Bush's veto is holding up re-enlistments and causing "some bonus programs for airmen" to expire:

Keep reading...Show less

US Soldiers Stage Mutiny in Baghdad

After an IED attack killed five members of 2nd Platoon Charlie 1-26 in northeast Baghdad, members of the unit gathered and determined that they could no longer function professionally. Several soldiers feared that their anger and want for revenge would result in a massacre of innocent civilians, and thus decided to stage a revolt against the orders of their commanders.

Charlie 1-26 was the hardest hit unit in Iraq so far, losing 14 soldiers in 12 months. Kelly Kennedy of the Army Times, who was embedded with Charlie Company, recalled the hostility the unit had towards Iraqis living under US occupation:

Keep reading...Show less

Iraqi Lawmakers Walk Out of Parliament to Protest "Humiliating" US Treatment

This post, written by GottaLaff, originally appeared on Cliff Schecter's Brave New Films Blog

Iraqi lawmakers are the latest to protest US troops. See how easy it is to win hearts and minds?
Dozens of Iraqi lawmakers walked out of parliament Wednesday to protest what they view as overly aggressive and humiliating treatment by U.S. soldiers as representatives enter Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone, where the legislature is located.
What next, protesting Blackwater? Perish the thought.
Feryad Rawandozi, a high-ranking official with the Kurdish parliamentary bloc [said] U.S. soldiers "are very arrogant and impolite when they talk to us, especially with those who don't speak English."
All the security apparently doesn't help them to feel very secure:
Legislators, like everyone else entering the Green Zone, must submit to a gauntlet of physical searches, and allow their vehicles to be inspected by bomb-sniffing dogs. They must line up with the throngs of other residents and employees seeking to enter the area, which is also headquarters to U.S. operations in Iraq. The process can take up to two hours.
"This is unacceptable," Rawandozi said.
They say it's understandable to go through security checks. The two-hour wait and their demeaning treatment isn't so understandable.
Army Maj. Anton Alston, a spokesman for Multi-National Force-Iraq, acknowledged that U.S. soldiers guarding checkpoints might be misconstrued as hostile, but said the troops were simply trying to ensure security. [...]
"If we come off as aggressive, it might be a cultural thing," Alston added.
::slaps head:: Of course. It's that cultural thing. Verbal abuse and humiliation is just something we American invaders do because we're, well, American.

So the culturally indignant lawmakers vented.

"Body Of War": Phil Donahue's First Film Profiles Anti-War Iraq Veteran [VIDEO]

This post, written by Paddy, originally appeared on Cliff Schecter's Brave New Films Blog

Geez, I would have known this back in the day when I read Variety more than Salon. Sounds interesting.
Body of War is a 2007 documentary following Tomas Young, an Iraq War veteran paralyzed from a bullet to the spine, on a physical and emotional journey as he adapts to his new body and begins to question the decision to go to war in Iraq. From soldier to anti-war activist, the film takes an unflinching view of the physical and emotional aftermath of war through the eyes of an American hero.
As Tomas' journey unfolds, the film cuts back and forth to Congressional proceedings in Washington DC. Footage includes passionate speeches by Senator Robert Byrd as well as a running tally of how each US Congress member voted regarding the decision to go to war in Iraq.
Body of War premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival to a sold out house where it received multiple standing ovations [1] and won the People's Choice Award (runner-up).[2] It was also awarded the Audience Award for Best Documentary at the Hamptons International Film Festival. [3]
Wheeeee!!!! I just called and got free tickets!!
Donahue to screen new film about Iraq at ND
SOUTH BEND - Television talk show host Phil Donahue** will screen his first film, "Body of War," at the University of Notre Dame's DeBartolo Center for the Performing Arts at 7 and 10 p.m. Dec. 7.
Pretty cool. Beats seeing REO at the Morris!!! (The usual local fare)

Maliki Government Paves the Way for Permanent US Bases in Iraq

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

Way back in February 2006, Tom Engelhardt noted that the "debate" over permanent U.S. bases in Iraq was practically non-existent. After a search of the LexisNexis database, he explained, "American reporters adhere to a simple rule: The words 'permanent,' 'bases,' and 'Iraq' should never be placed in the same sentence, not even in the same paragraph; in fact, not even in the same news report."

It wasn't too big a mystery -- talk of permanent bases was considered impolite for the political mainstream. It was a subject best relegated to blogs and talk radio. When congressional Dems started taking the matter seriously, congressional Republicans quickly shut down any policy proposals that might limit a permanent U.S. presence in Iraq.

With that in mind, today's news is not at all encouraging.
Iraq's government, seeking protection against foreign threats and internal coups, will offer the U.S. a long-term troop presence in Iraq in return for U.S. security guarantees as part of a strategic partnership, two Iraqi officials said Monday.
The proposal, described to The Associated Press by two senior Iraqi officials familiar with the issue, is one of the first indications that the United States and Iraq are beginning to explore what their relationship might look like once the U.S. significantly draws down its troop presence.
As Spencer Ackerman explained, "Make no mistake: this is Nouri al-Maliki offering the U.S. a permanent presence in return for guaranteeing the security of his government.... In exchange for a platform for the indefinite projection of American power throughout the Middle East, the Bush Administration probably considers protection for Maliki and his coterie to be a small price to pay."

In the AP report, Bush administration officials are downplaying the significance of these developments....
When asked about the plan, U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Mirembe Nantongo noted that Iraqi officials had expressed a desire for a strategic partnership with the U.S. in a political declaration in August and an end to the U.N.-mandated force.
"Thereafter then, the question becomes one of bilateral relationships between Iraq and the countries of the multinational forces," she said. "At that point we need to be considering long-term bilateral relationships and we're following the Iraqi thinking on this one and we agree with their thinking on this and we'll be looking at setting up a long-term partnership with different aspects to it, political, economic, security and so forth."
She said any detailed discussion of bases and investment preferences was "way, way, way ahead of where we are at the moment."
...but Iraqi officials are moving forward apace.
The Iraqi officials said that under the proposed formula, Iraq would get full responsibility for internal security and U.S. troops would relocate to bases outside the cities. Iraqi officials foresee a long-term presence of about 50,000 U.S. troops, down from the current figure of more than 160,000.
Haidar al-Abadi, a senior Dawa member of al-Maliki's Dawa party, told Alhurra television that the prime minister would write parliament in the next few days to tell lawmakers that his government would seek the renewal of the U.N. mandate for "one last time."
@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.