laverne cox

Security expert reveals massive flaws in Trump’s 'politically inept' ruse

One of the week's bombshell stories is U.S. President Donald Trump dodging —according to the New York Times and the Washington Post — an Iranian assassination plot by using a decoy plane that he was wasn't actually flying on. The Times described it as an "elaborate ruse." But conservative journalist Tom Nichols seriously takes issue with the way the decoy was handled in a biting piece for The Atlantic.

"When the Secret Service got wind of a plan last month to kill Trump — apparently by taking out Air Force One — it engaged in a clever bit of misdirection: Trump boarded the usual Air Force One 747 in full view of the cameras, and then everyone shut the window shades as Trump surreptitiously climbed into one of the large containers that delivers food to an airplane galley," the Never Trump conservative explains in The Atlantic. "That container was then trucked over to a smaller C-32A aircraft, where Trump exited the container and boarded the plane — which, because of the president's presence, instantly became the real Air Force One. The C-32A and the 747 then both flew to the United Kingdom, with the 747 continuing the ruse by identifying itself as 'Air Force One.'"

Nichols continues, "Trump got off the smaller plane in Britain, snuck back on to the 747, and then exited from it as if he'd been on board the whole time. He then got on another 747, the lavish new Air Force One 2.0 given to Trump by the Qatari government, to fly home. We learned about the plane swap in Turkey in a scoop from the Washington Post reporter Dan Lamothe and his colleagues, but more reporting now suggests that this whole escapade went from a Beatles movie to a Marx Brothers comedy."

But unlike the Beatles, Nichols emphasizes, Trump and his allies put people in danger with what the Times described as an "elaborate ruse."

"Trump, as it turns out, was not alone on the food truck," the conservative writer notes. "While the press and some others on the plane were told nothing about a threat, Trump reportedly climbed into the catering container with three of his White House footmen: Dan Scavino (his former caddie) and Walt Nauta (his former butler), both of whom are now White House aides, and Natalie Harp, his executive assistant. Meanwhile, military officers, enlisted staff, and several American civilians were left on a plane that was deemed too dangerous for the president."

Nichols stresses that while the Secret Service must do everything possible to protect the U.S. president, some daunting questions need to be answered.

"The commander in chief is the most important person on any American aircraft, and his safety must take precedence over all other concerns or interests," Nichols argues. "If the Secret Service wanted Trump spirited out of Turkey for his security, then no one should second-guess that decision ... One immediate question: If the situation was that dangerous, why send up the first 747 at all — and with two men fairly senior in the line of presidential succession aboard? Perhaps the threat wasn't quite so dire, or its parameters were not well-enough defined, and the Secret Service acted out of a superabundance of caution. Or perhaps the president thinks it's acceptable to send up an airplane full of innocent Americans as a decoy to draw fire so that he can evade enemy action ... Not only was it morally appalling to keep so many people in the dark about the threat; it was politically inept, on two levels."

Nichols adds, "First, imagine if something had actually happened to the decoy And second, Trump missed a major opportunity. Had he brought a few reporters with him, they could have told the story of a clever evasion. The 747, meanwhile, could have been temporarily held and its passengers delayed until Trump emerged in Britain, when the Iranians would find out they'd been had. That's not how this White House works."

Biden family grift vs. Trump family grift: Let's do the numbers

Most people recognize that Donald Trump and his kids are stealing from us with both hands every day. But they are not as outraged as they should be because most have the view that everyone does it. While I will never defend the Democrats as paragons of honesty (what the hell are those crypto contributions?), they are not in the same ballpark as Trump and his crew.

Part of the confusion stems from the media’s refusal to ever put big numbers in context. They all know that the vast majority of their audience is not clear on the distinction between millions, billions, and trillions, and have no idea how large the federal budget is, but they refuse to take the ten seconds and ten words that would be needed to give readers a clearer sense of what is at stake.

The other source of confusion is that the Republicans spent four years endlessly hyping the “Biden crime family.” They used Congressional hearings, as well as thousands of appearances on TV news, shows to yell (often literally) about Biden family corruption.

And it’s clear it was not zero. Hunter Biden, while struggling with drug addiction, openly traded on his family name to land a well-paying perch with a Ukrainian energy company. He also managed to sell his artwork, which is not obviously of great value, for $50K a painting.

Joe’s younger brother James also seems to have traded on the family name, but the sums involved appear to be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars, and mostly during the years 2017-2019, when Joe Biden was not even in public office.

It is a bad practice for family members to profit from their ties to a vice-president or president, but there is zero evidence that Joe Biden ever did anything to directly benefit his son or brothers in their business dealings. We can be pretty certain of this fact because Republicans in Congress and the White House, both in Trump’s first term and his current term, have left no stone unturned in trying to show Biden’s corruption. (Trump’s first impeachment was over his effort to extort Ukraine’s president to lie about Biden’s corruption.)

While it is difficult to get clear numbers on the extent of the corruption of Trump and his family in his current term, since they disclose as little as possible, and no one can accept what they do disclose at face value, we can try to put some numbers on it. At the very least, it should be totally clear that Trump’s corruption, by any measure, is in a totally different universe from even the worst imaginable story that can be told about Joe Biden and his family.

The list below is far from exhaustive. We will probably not know all the ways that Trump put money into his and his family’s pockets until long after his presidency, and maybe not even then. But this should be a good start.

Venezuela’s Oil: $13 billion

Trump has repeatedly said that “we” got $13 billion from selling Venezuela’s oil. This is after he kidnapped Venezuela’s president Nicholas Maduro, and put his vice-president Delcy Rodríguez in charge of the country. According to Trump, she is taking her orders from Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Any money that the US gets from selling Venezuela’s oil is essentially stolen from Venezuela. It is their oil. But to make matters worse, there is literally zero accounting of this money. Under the law, any money obtained from Venezuela should go to the US Treasury. Any spending from this money should be approved by Congress.

Instead, Trump has sent the money to an account in Qatar, and it is unclear what is happening with it. Until it can be shown otherwise, it is reasonable to assume that Trump has personally pocketed it. If that is not the case, Trump should be able to document what has happened to this money any day of the week. Until he does show what happened to the money, we might as well assume it went into Donald Trump’s pockets.

Trump Family Crypto: $1.4 billion

Trump created his own crypto coin, $Trump, which people could buy as a way of currying favor with him. Melania Trump also made a crypto coin, $MELANIA. Trump’s crypto company, World Liberty Financial, has also put out a crypto coin. In addition to making money from selling the coins directly, Trump also profits from transactions in the coins, since they pay him a fee.

Trump’s “Gift” Plane from Qatar: $1.1 billion

A gift to the president while they are in office is a gift to the United States government. Nonetheless, Trump plans to take the plane that Qatar gave him back to Mar-a-Lago when he leaves office in less than two and a half years. The plane itself was worth $400 million. In addition, the Pentagon is spending between $400 million and $1 billion to install protective equipment which was already in place for the two existing versions of Air Force 1. I have included the middle figure of $700 million.

Trump Truth Social Insider Trading Sales: $1.2 billion

Donald Trump recently announced that he will sell a special subscription service where, for $100,000 a month, investors could get advance notice of Truth Social posts that are likely to move markets. We don’t know how many investors will ultimately pay for the opportunity to trade on inside information. But if it ends up being 1,000, Trump will pocket $1.2 billion a year from this scam.

Selling pardons: $10 million

Reuters did an investigation of Trump’s pardons, noting that 96 percent did not follow the normal procedure. They noted that just ten prominent pardon recipients contributed over $10 million to Trump campaign funds. The full amount given by all the people receiving pardons is surely considerably larger. The New York Times had an excellent piece back in March on the pardon industry that has arisen around Trump.

Melania Trump’s Documentary: $28 million

Melania Trump was given a contract by Amazon for rights to a documentary about her life. According to the Wall Street Journal, her take was $28 million. The film grossed $16 million.

Jared Kushner Hedge Fund Investments: $5.4 billion

Shortly after leaving the White House following Trump’s first term, first son-in-law Jared Kushner started a hedge fund, Affinity Partners, that quickly drew billions of dollars of investments from Saudi Arabia and other Persian Gulf countries. While Kushner cannot directly put this money into his pocket, he is certainly positioned to get hundreds of millions in fees from the fund, especially if his proximity to Trump allows for his investments to have large payoffs.

Trump Sons’ Military Contracts: $315 million

Donald Trump, Jr. and Eric Trump have recently taken an interest in several companies that are now getting contracts from the military. The Washington Post puts the value of the current and likely future contracts for these companies at $6.3 billion. If we say 5 percent will go to the Trump kids, this comes to $315 million.

While this list hopefully captures the biggest windfalls that Trump and his family are receiving from the presidency, it is certainly not a complete list of Trump family corruption. For example, Donald Trump, Jr. is a paid advisor to the Kalshi betting market and an investor in Polymarket. The Trump administration has worked aggressively to block regulation of these markets that might hurt their profits.

Donald Trump also trades stock frequently, often buying shares in companies just before they get a major government contract. The Trump family business has been blessed with favorable treatment of hotel and resort projects in countries seeking lower tariff rates on their exports to the United States. And the Trump family openly hawks their merchandise at the White House and on official websites. But most of these items would likely to be small potatoes compared to the graft listed here.

The Biden Crime Family’s Haul

As with the Trump numbers, these are crude guesses. People can also decide for themselves the extent to which they represent presidential corruption. For example, when Hunter Biden gets payments from shady Chinese businesspeople in a period where Joe Biden is a private citizen, is that presidential corruption?

Anyhow, here is what I get.

Hunter Biden Burisma Payments: $4.0 million

These were payments made to Hunter Biden for serving on the board of Burisma, a large Ukrainian energy firm. Hunter Biden served on Burisma’s board starting in 2014, when Joe Biden was vice-president, and remained on the board until 2019, leaving before Joe Biden’s term as president.

Hunter Biden Payment from Chinese Businesses: $2.6 million

Hunter received $2.6 million in payments in 2017 and 2018 from Chinese business owners with dubious business practices. These were years when Joe Biden was a private citizen, his term as vice-president having ended and more than two years before his term as president began.

Hunter Biden Art Sales: $1.5 million

Hunter sold 27 paintings between 2021 and 2023 that netted him approximately $1.5 million. Demand for his artwork has fallen considerably after his father left the White House.

Jim Biden Payment from Chinese Businesses: $500,000

It seems that some of the money from Hunter Biden’s business associates may have also gone to his uncle (Joe Biden’s brother). It’s not clear how much this might have been, but as with the payments to Hunter Biden, this was a period where Joe Biden was a private citizen.

If anyone is wondering, I did not forget to put the Biden numbers on the graph. They are just too small to be visible next to the Trump graft numbers.

The point here should be obvious to everyone. Joe Biden’s family members, or at least Hunter Biden, behaved in ways that most of us would likely view as unethical. But even if we blame President Biden for actions in which he had no direct involvement, his corruption is not anywhere near the level of corruption of the Trump administration.

Trump and his family seem to view the government as a massive candy store from which they can take whatever they want as long as Donald Trump is in the White House. And as long as Republicans control Congress and the Supreme Court, they might be right.

Lawsuit filed against Trump's 'blatantly corrupt' Truth Social scheme

A lawsuit filed on Wednesday is challenging the legality of Truth API, a recently unveiled initiative to allow Wall Street firms to pay up to $100,000 per month in exchange for early access to potentially market-moving social media posts from President Donald Trump.

The complaint, filed by the Freedom of the Press Foundation (FPF) and The Intercept, alleges Truth API violates the US Constitution’s First Amendment by granting insiders special access to the president’s announcements.

The scheme also violates the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment by “charging unreasonable sums that cannot be justified to offset the cost” of receiving the benefit of information from the president, the complaint states.

The lawsuit describes Truth API as “profoundly corrupt,” given that “the president stands to gain financially by giving ‘market-moving’ government information to those who are willing and able to pay his personal company.”

In establishing the plaintiffs’ standing, the complaint argues that The Intercept is being put at a competitive disadvantage by the scheme, given that the news outlet is “both unable and unwilling to subscribe” to it, even though it risks “losing out on timely news to competing organizations.”

Ben Muessig, editor-in-chief of The Intercept, accused the president of “trying to enrich himself by privatizing government information that he has no right to sell,” while vowing that “we won’t let that stand.”

David Bralow, chief legal officer for The Intercept, said that “nothing could be more antithetical to the free, independent press than the president charging for early access to his public announcements,” emphasizing that “public information belongs to the public.”

Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at FPF, said Truth API “is so blatantly corrupt and unconstitutional that it would have been hard to even fathom just a few years ago.”

“Trump’s crooked scheme is particularly outrageous,” Stern added, “because, as documented by our Trump Anti-Press Social Media Tracker, he frequently uses his Truth Social account to berate journalists and even to announce his plans to sue them and criminally investigate them. Then, he makes them wait in line behind paying customers to find out about it unless they’re willing to subsidize the platform he uses to attack them.”

The Intercept and the FPF are being represented in the case by attorneys from Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), the Yale Law School Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, the Public Integrity Project, and Altshuler Berzon LLP.

Nikhel Sus, chief counsel at CREW, said his organization was “proud to represent our clients in their effort to end this corrupt and unconstitutional scheme” because “all Americans are entitled to timely access to their president’s public statements, not just those willing to pay the president’s company $100,000 a month.”

Truth API has also drawn the attention of Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), ranking member of the US House Judiciary Committee, who announced a probe into the initiative last month, describing it as an “insider-information scheme” that “will enable Wall Street to profit from the president’s frequent market-moving posts on major businesses.”

Boomers are ruining America — and it has nothing to do with politics

I keep hearing that we Boomers are to blame for just about everything wrong with America — unaffordable housing (because we bought up most of the housing stock and now refuse to leave), the depletion of Social Security (because we’re collecting it now), the national debt (because so much of it is being spent on Social Security, Medicare, and other benefits for us), inequality (because apparently we have so much money), climate change (because we’ve been polluting longer than anyone else alive), and even Trump (because he’s one of us).

I don’t have standing to contest these claims because, well, I’ve also made them. They’re a theme of my latest book, Coming Up Short (out in paperback in a few weeks).

All of this seemed confirmed by a recent headline in The Economist: WHY PEOPLE OVER THE AGE OF 55 ARE THE NEW PROBLEM GENERATION.

But not for the reasons I supposed. According to The Economist, the real problem with us Boomers is we’re partying too hard. We were too wild, crazy, and irresponsible back in the day, and we’re still too wild, crazy, and irresponsible.

The Economist opines that compared to younger generations, we’re drinking more and using drugs more, and we’re going to wild retirement-community parties where sometimes we’re even — oh my goodness! — having sex.

The venerable British publication quotes Lynette, a resident of Latitude Margaritaville (an assisted-living community near Hilton Head Island in South Carolina) who burbles: “There was a toga party this past weekend. There was a live band, and it was a riot.” Barbie, another resident of the community, compares living there to “starting college all over again” with “drinks on the driveway, cocktails on the concrete.”

The Economist goes on to report that “today, older adults are more likely to participate in the hookup culture of casual encounters and condomless sex, which might be further encouraged by the availability of drugs for sexual dysfunction, the commonality of living in retirement communities, and the increased use of dating apps for seniors.”

I’ll be damned.

Since its founding in 1843 by Scottish businessman and banker James Wilson, The Economist has been staid if not prudish. If memory serves, it intensely disliked the 1960s and the Boomer culture that reveled in it. But it seems to have burst its britches over what’s become of us Boomers in the roaring 2020s.

The article concludes:

The generations now ageing disgracefully were disgraceful in youth, and in middle age. If they’re behaving badly now, there is really not much to be done about it. If they choose to frolic at toga parties, no one will stop them. Except, ultimately, time.

Which is The Economist’s understated British way of saying that the solution to the Boomer problem is for we Boomers to just go ahead and die already.

I think The Economist is a bit harsh. I do concede in my latest book that we Boomers have produced some awful things — not just Trump, but also Clarence Thomas and George W. Bush. (Trump is probably the best thing ever to happen to George W., because George W. is no longer the worst and stupidest president in American history.)

But I doubt Boomers are having too much fun. I’m suspicious of how The Economist identified its sample of wild and crazy Boomers because the Boomers I know are anything but.

The question my friends and I jokingly (and brutishly) asked one other in our wild youth — “getting much?”— now refers not to sex but to sleep.

I can’t even make it through the end of a movie. Hell, I can barely keep my eyes open through a single episode of “All Creatures Great and Small.”

The most camaraderie I’ve been enjoying are my “organ recitals” with Boomer friends in which we ask each other: How is the back? Heart? Knees? Prostate? Hemorrhoids?

And the wildest party I’ve been to this year was when I got together with friends to watch the World Cup final between Spain and Argentina, where Argentina failed to register a single shot on target during 120 minutes of a 1-to-zip extra-time defeat. (I didn’t see the end of that one, either.)

As for drugs, sex, and rock-and-roll, all I can say for certain is I don’t have the same need to make an ass of myself as I did in the 1960s.

Yet I still mist up when I hear “December 1963 (Oh What a Night)” by Frankie Valli & the Four Seasons. (I should note it was released in 1975, by which time I was practicing law and my memorable nights were long over.)

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/

Democrats in denial about Trump cult election infiltration

Even though the White House has failed in its court cases to meddle in state elections, it is still planning to seize ballots and worse. President Donald Trump's cult-like supporters are embedded everywhere and poll workers and Democrats need to stop being in denial about that — at least according to one election security expert.

"This is where I depart from some of the happy talk that you sometimes get," election rights attorney Marc Elias told MS NOW anchor Jacob Soboroff on Wednesday after Soboroff claimed if Trump tries to steal the election, poll workers will stop him.

"There's a tendency for everyone to want to say, 'Well, don't worry, the poll workers will take care of it,'" Elias said. "Well, here are two problems for you. The first is that it's a lot to ask poll workers to stand up to the federal government. It's one thing if it's a bunch of guys in polo shirts — jokers looking to maybe cause a little bit of disruption, but otherwise fine. But let's imagine it's not that. Let's imagine it's ICE agents with guns. Let's imagine it's people with much more aggressive tactics. It's a lot to put on the poll workers. But here's the second problem, and I need everyone to pay attention to this."

He added, "There are a lot of really good election officials, but Tina Peters [a Coloradan imprisoned for trying to meddle in elections] was an election official. Republicans have been putting election deniers in key positions in key states and counties around this country. The election deniers aren't just running for statewide offices. They're not just running for Secretary of State — they're running for, or being placed in, these local election official positions as well. So do I think that in Minneapolis we're in good shape? Yes. But what happens when you're in a state like Texas or Florida, where the Republican Party runs the state government but has also infiltrated a lot of these local county positions at a MAGA level? That's where I worry it isn't just going to be election officials standing up to the federal government. Remember, I mentioned we've won 21 cases — the Department of Justice sued 30 states. There were 20 states that turned it over voluntarily, and those are the places I'm, in some ways, more worried about."

The states in question were "Iowa, Wyoming, South Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Indiana, Texas, Alaska, Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, Missouri, Kansas and Montana."

"It's unbelievable, and that's why I think you're so right — you can't just rely on the poll workers," Soboroff told Elias. "You can't just rely on the lawyers. You can't just rely on other elected officials or election ministers who've been at this for years. It's all hands on deck — a mayday situation."

- YouTube youtu.be

https://youtu.be/SIMIJFFokgA

Republican Party embraces 'felon in chief' as inspiration to flout scandal

President Donald Trump appears to have a flawless four-point plan for surviving the worst political scandals, and Republicans are determined to follow it.

It’s a kind of Konami code, reports Bulwark writer and researcher Will Saletan: Never resign. Deny everything. Accuse the accusers. And invoke Trump.

After three women accused Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio) of physically abusing them, Miller told Trump he would stay in. Then Saletan said he went on TV and called Trump his model. He boasted that Trump had survived similar allegations in 2016 and that he, Miller, would now do the same.

“Miller is the latest in a line of scandal-plagued Republican congressmen who have played the Trump card. In the face of investigations, indictments, or convictions, they have denounced law enforcement and invoked the felon-in-chief as their inspiration to fight on,” Saletan said. “It hasn’t always worked out for them. But in doing so, they’ve clarified the ethos of today’s GOP: It’s a party of reprobates, led by a crook.”

In 2018, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) got indicted on charges of stealing money from his campaign for personal use. Similarly, Hunter vowed “I am not going anywhere.” Hunter accused the Justice Department of bias against him, and he embraced Trump — the party’s crook commander — who was also being investigated for obstruction of justice in the Russiagate scandal.

“The ploy paid off,” said Saletan. “Soon after Hunter delivered those remarks, Trump publicly rebuked Sessions for allowing DOJ to indict the congressman. Two months later, Trump dumped Sessions. And two years later, after Hunter pleaded guilty to the charges, Trump pardoned him.”

And in 2021, when Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) faced scrutiny in a federal sex-trafficking investigation he quickly announced “I am absolutely not resigning,” in a Washington Examiner op-ed. Then he accused the accusers and invoked Trump’s name in one go by claiming he was falsely accused, “just as they once falsely attacked President Donald Trump as a Russian asset.”

“Again, Trump rewarded the suckup,” said Saletan. “In November 2024, he nominated Gaetz to be the attorney general. Trump dropped the nomination only after it became clear that Gaetz couldn’t get confirmed. A month later, the House Ethics Committee reported “substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz violated House Rules and other standards of conduct prohibiting prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use, impermissible gifts, special favors or privileges, and obstruction of Congress.”

In 2023, Rep. George Santos (R-N.Y.) — the same. When he was indicted on charges of money laundering, wire fraud, credit card fraud, identity theft, and theft of public funds, Saletan said he refused to step down and then immediately invoked the fraudster-in-chief: “I’m entitled to that same process that Joe Biden is entitled [to], that Donald Trump was entitled to, but Donald Trump was denied,” he said.

The House expelled him, and in August 2024, he pleaded guilty to wire fraud and identity theft and got seven years in prison.

Five months later, Trump commuted Santos’s sentence, bouncing him from prison.

The formula also held true for Republican Gov. Eric Greitens (R-Mo.) and his allegations of violent and coercive sexual behavior, said Saletan: Never resign. Deny everything. Accuse the accusers. And invoke Trump.

“In the years before Trump, Republicans talked a lot about character. They denounced Bill Clinton’s adultery, his perjury, and his exploitation of an intern. They said moral rot was infectious. They warned that a party led by a scoundrel, and dedicated to defending that scoundrel, would come to resemble him,” said Saletan. “Under Trump, they’ve proved it.”

'They feel it': Strategist says Republicans know their darkest fear has come to pass

Democratic James Carville said the nation is clearly losing patience with President Donald Trump, and even Republican voters are finding themselves less and less beholden to the man — even if they are loathe to admit it.

He said on his Wednesday “Politics War Room” podcast that many Republican and MAGA voters appear to be bidding a fond farewell to Trump as they cast their eye to a new cult leader.

Nowhere was this clearer, said Carville, than in the South Carolina primaries this week, as State Sen. Darline Graham failed to clinch the primary after Trump offered her a full-throated endorsement. Now she faces a second grueling run-off against Republican Rep. Ralph Norman, a conservative hard-liner who had previously run for governor.

Republican voters expressed doubt about Graham in earlier surveys, with one Trump voter saying “she has a master's and she's helped people that are blind and she's a lovely woman advocate. But I don't feel like she has the experience.”

“With Trump, it's kind of like he wants her to take his place because I almost feel like he feels like he can just mold her into doing whatever he wants,” complained another Trump voter. “… It was kind of like, ‘well, let's get her in there and, you know, she'll do what I want.’”

Carville himself acknowledged in conversations with Republicans that Graham appeared to be a “hard” sell after South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster temporarily appointed Sen. Lindsey Graham's younger sister to the GOP senator's seat following his unexpected July death.

He added that Trump’s endorsement appeared to deliver diminishing returns as the president’s popularity continued to crater.

“The most under covered story in American politics today is Trump’s Republican approval numbers. They keep falling,” said Carville on Wednesday. “I think it’s coming in at 80 now in most polls, which is significantly lower than 95. For the last 10- years it’s been Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, and the country is starting to turn away from him.”

His polling numbers are down but he’s just becoming less relevant in peoples’ minds and I think that applies to Republican primary voters in South Carolina. I think every day his endorsements lose a tenth of a point of influence,” Carville added.

“It sure did in Minnesota,” said show co-host Al Hunt, referring to the crash and burn gubernatorial campaign of Trump endorsee Mike Lindell.

“They can feel it,” said Carville. “Even the Trump MAGA people, they’re becoming less attached.”

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Trump has a weirdly specific wish list to replace Karoline Leavitt

Karoline Leavitt's stint as President Donald Trump's press secretary was full of controversies, from her insulting Generation Z by blaming them for their economic suffering to accidentally confirming a story about Trump arguing with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth that she had intended to deny. Yet now that she is being replaced as press secretary, one reporter claims that Trump has a very long and weirdly specific wish list for her successor.

"According to my sources, the next White House press secretary will be someone @realDonaldTrump deems 'from central casting,'" posted journalist Mark Halperin on X on Wednesday. He added that the person will need to be "either a man or a woman, someone who thinks much of the White House press corps is biased against this president, has never been governor of Arkansas, and is not named 'Scott.'"

Halperin concluded, "Narrows it down quite a bit…."

While it is unclear how much of Halperin's post was satirical, Trump has a long history of preferring to work with people who look good in their parts, from Hegseth to his first Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson.

Leavitt's departure had its own weirdness to complement Trump's reported laundry list for her follow up. When she posted her goodbye statement online, it was flagged for being written by AI.

"The truth is since returning to the White House after the birth of my daughter, I have felt in my heart that I cannot be the best mom my two young children deserve while devoting the constant time, energy, and attention required of the White House Press Secretary — and that is why I have ultimately made the bittersweet decision to depart the White House and embark on a new chapter in my life," Leavitt wrote, adding that she was grateful for her husband and family. Yet as Status News reporter Natalie Korach pointed out, a brief note at the end of Leavitt's post said "Interesting flag at the bottom of this post: 'Made with AI.'"

For Karoline Leavitt, the youngest person ever to command the White House podium, stepping down marks the end of a whirlwind tenure defined by fierce loyalty to Donald Trump and sharp, unyielding parrying with the press corps. Having recently returned from maternity leave following the birth of her second child, Leavitt ultimately chose family over the relentless 24/7 grind of the briefing room. Yet, true to her turbulent time in the spotlight, her digital sign-off became an ironic final headline when it was flagged as AI-assisted. Rather than fading away, Leavitt pivots smoothly into an outside advisory role, leaving a massive void and a unique standard for whoever inherits the president’s next communications apparatus.

Widow’s Bay actor draws link between Trump and show’s most horrifying creep

Actor Matthew Rhys’ longtime partner and fellow actress Keri Russell discussed their Emmy nominations in an interview with Variety. Rhys chatted about his roles in Widow’s Bay and The Beast in Me, and Russell discussed her nomination for The Diplomat.

But even though President Donald Trump and the chaos politics surrounding him and the White House did not factor into the isolated world of the northeastern island that served as Widow’s Bay’s setting there was no banishing the controversial president form the exchange.

As they discussed the popularity of Widow’s Bay, Russell said she appreciated the “escape” the show provided the audience — even if it buries modern American politics in the drip-drip creepiness that plagues the beleaguered island inhabitants.

“It’s also such a delightful departure from the s—— that we’re in,” Russell told Variety. “Do you know what I mean? There is not a mention in the show so far for me about what’s happening — the destruction of our country,”

“Right?” she added, laughing “mordantly” according to Variety.

But Rhys disagreed, telling her that there was in fact one character in the series that reminded him of the make-up wearing White House occupant.

“Well, there is,” said Rhys, referring to the ghost of a clown that murdered children decades ago and who now lurks and heaves around in a dark basement containing his desiccated corpse. “In the crawlspace. That’s Trump.”

The interviewer noted that Russell seemed “dismayed” by the revelation. Her own show, the Diplomat, is set in a world of high-stakes international intrigue and smartly run government, “as we imagine it being practiced in a pre-MAGA era,” according to Variety.

“It can feel as if no time has passed since ‘The West Wing’ or ‘Homeland,’ both of which “Diplomat ‘ creator Debra Cahn wrote for.

Trump 'rotting' into a meal ticket for MAGA vultures: analysis

National security analyst David Rothkopf tells the Daily Beast that President Donald Trump is a decaying husk of a man these days, but his gooey meat is delicious to the right kind of vulture.

“We are watching the president ripen and rot before our very eyes,” said Rothkopf. “If he were a banana, he’d be in the trash right now — or, at best, on his way into a recipe for banana bread.
From swollen ankles and bruised hands, we’ve watched this deterioration progress with each passing day. This week saw a progression of bruises up his arms. He is barely able to stay awake at virtually any public function he attends. His behavior is erratic. His already limited vocabulary is increasingly beyond his recall. He needs to be propped up when he walks any distance at all. According to reports, he emits strange odors.”

“It’s not pretty,” Rothkopf adds. And given Trump’s power and responsibilities, this brand of high-speed decay should be a source of alarm and action. It’s not enough for Trump’s handlers to simply restrict his schedule.

“There are reasons why the White House promotes the myth that flaccid, slumped, shuffling, mentally crumbling Donald Trump is healthy and capable enough to be president. They all tie to the fact that Trump is not the only person who stands to benefit from his being president,” Rothkopf said. “His family profits from it. His senior staff has influence and even power they would never otherwise have.”

In his addled state, Rothkopf said Trump is a “cash cow” for his own corrupt enterprises as well as a “meal ticket” for a slew of carrion eaters.

“That is why it is likely that, even as he continues his slow, sad collapse, it will be covered up and lied about, possibly long after he is effectively non compos mentis.

Rothkopf said this has happened before. James A. Garfield spent weeks between being shot and dying, with the nation led by an informal committee while his wife Lucretia pumped out lies about how well he was doing. Chester Arthur and Grover Cleveland both concealed serious illnesses that their administrations denied. Woodrow Wilson suffered a massive stroke, which his doctor covered up with claims of “digestive upset” or “exhaustion.” Franklin Roosevelt suffered a serious case of cardiovascular collapse that made him malfunctional for more than a year before his death. Again, a committee stepped in to fill the void. His vice president, Truman, wasn’t even told.

“In many of these cases, … power [often] flowed to those with proximity to the stricken leader — not necessarily to those who were in any legal line of succession,” argued Rothkopf. “… On multiple occasions have presidents become incapacitated or weakened, with their conditions hidden and their responsibilities and prerogatives farmed out to or seized by close associates. … I spoke with numerous government officials who, in past decades and administrations, have been in the room when these decisions and power plays have been made.”

Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, or Trump’s sons, or other power-hungry Trump inner circle scavenger could make up the difference when Trump goes completely stupid, said Rothkopf. And, in so doing, benefit themselves.

“What we see happening in and around Trump right now suggests it may already have begun,” Rothkopf said. “Trump can’t keep a thought in his head for five minutes straight. He barely understands the key decisions he makes. Who is currently saying, ‘I’ve got this, boss? Trust me.’”

“Are you comfortable with the prospect of Shadow President Stephen Miller? It’s something we all might want to consider sooner rather than later,” Rothkopf said.

Trump just lost another big elections case in a key swing state

President Donald Trump is focused on Michigan, a key swing state that he cited in his July speech falsely alleging widespread voter fraud and which is likely to be a target if he seizes ballots during the midterm elections. Yet a Michigan jurist, Judge Randy Wallace, announced on Wednesday that Michigan Republicans will not be able to wage a lawsuit to make it easier for Trump supporters to make frivolous claims of voter fraud.

"In a victory for voters, a Michigan judge dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Republican National Committee (RNC) that sought to make it easier for partisan poll challengers to dispute voter eligibility and interrupt the state’s ballot-counting process," reported Democracy Docket's Matt Cohen on Wednesday. Michigan Court of Claims Judge Randy Wallace found that the complaint was 'barred by laches,' meaning the RNC waited too long to file its lawsuit, leaving election officials too little time to implement changes before voters head to the polls for November’s midterms.

Cohen explained that "poll challengers are citizens appointed by political parties and nonpartisan groups to observe the ballot-counting process at polling places. Challengers differ from poll watchers in that they have the authority to challenge a voter’s eligibility or question election administration procedures if they have good reason to believe something is wrong."
He added that Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson has "aimed to make it more difficult for poll challengers to lodge frivolous challenges that delay or disrupt the ballot-counting process."

In his ruling, Wallace expressed dismay at the methods used by the RNC in attempting to sneak in rules to make it easier to overturn valid votes before the state could have a chance to effectively respond.

"This Court finds that because of plaintiffs' unreasonable delay in filing their complaint in this matter, there is not a reasonable amount of time, after the exhaustion of appeals, for election officials to comply with the mechanics and complexities that the relief requested would create," Wallace wrote, citing case law to prove his point.

"Plaintiffs have failed to rebut the presumption of laches, as it applies to the primary election," he added, citing additional case law. "Further, even if this Court accepts plaintiffs' argument about declaratory relief pertaining to the general election and thereafter, plaintiffs failed to bring this case at a proper time, as explained in this opinion."

Ultimately he concluded that the "defendants have demonstrated that they would be prejudiced as a result of plaintiffs' delay in filing the complaint. Thus, plaintiffs' complaint is barred by laches."

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.