gulf of america

The longest decade of our lives

So now that I’ve told you how I see the critical midterm races going on Tuesday, I want to take a few minutes to tell you what I think about you …

There’s no reason to duck.

When I typed earlier this week that, “the past two years have been the longest decade of my life,” it seemed to resonate with many of you good people, who have been brave enough to care about their faltering country since the orange devil came along dragging his racist stench behind him.

When America did the unimaginable two Novembers ago, and voted to put this bigot and proven enemy of our country back in our White House, it was just too much to process for any sane person who really does care about the United States of America.

I became dizzy as I watched the results roll in on Election Night 2024. The PTSD from the 2016 November Nightmare washed over me as the numbers relentlessly poured in from those must-have districts dotted across the country, and were delivered in a gory shade of blood-red.

I’d seen this horror movie before, and at 11 p.m. CST, I turned my TV off and sat quietly in a complete state of shock.

It was official: We could no longer trust far too many of our friends and family, who believed a narcissistic, racist, America- and woman-attacking maniac belonged in the most powerful job in the world inside our White House.

I didn’t stir until 4 a.m.

I considered how I would tackle the next four years, while rewinding what had gone so terribly wrong the previous four. When I had worn myself out and the smoke stopped seeping from my ears, I drifted off.

When I emerged from those three-hours of hard-fought sleep, the shock had still not subsided, and I typed a very raw, and righteous piece, HURT, for all of us:

“If the majority of my country is OK with an America-attacking, vulgar racist, whose only true talent is the ability to somehow always go lower, I find it terribly, terribly sad and wildly dangerous.
This does not make me a better or worse person than anyone else, it just makes me, me, and I am very proud and comfortable with that. And if you stood for what is good ... and right … and decent, you should be plenty proud of yourselves, too.”

Three days later, anger had replaced my melancholy, and I had a message for Trump and his morally busted voters:

“To Trump supporters I say this: If you have somehow twisted yourself into some self-righteous pretzel to justify your vote for a violent, racist, election-denying fascist YOU are the problem in this country, not us. This has happened many times before over the centuries with your type to no good end. If you would read even ONE history book your party wants burned you’d be forced to understand this, and maybe even deal with it. Oh, and here’s a dirty, little secret: The elites who run your abhorrent party fully know all this, and are using you for their terrible devices. As long as you support this, there is nothing you can say that I will ever listen to. You are a complete moral wreck. A mess. A five-alarm fire. You say you want cheaper gas and eggs, but fawn over the horrible man and circumstances that helped lead to their high cost in the first place with his subhuman response to a once-in-a-century pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands of us needlessly. Even wearing masks to help prevent the spread of this invisible killer was too much to ask of you. Seriously, go straight to hell.

I reintroduce those pieces today, because I think it is instructive to see where we’ve been, and what we’ve been through. It was going to be a long four years, but we had each other to lean on, and as long as we stayed together, we would continue to be a force to be reckoned with.

After all, we have been right about everything since the initial blast on Nov. 8, 2016 ...

We told anybody brave enough to listen to the truth who the grotesque Trump was, and what he was capable of, and on Jan. 6, 2021, when he leveled the worst attack on our Capitol since 1812, he proved us right.

He rallied his racist Orcs, turned them loose in our capital city, and did nothing for three-plus hours but root for his attack’s success. He didn’t bat an eye when they came for his Vice President or the Speaker of the House, or while overmatched law enforcement officers were kicked into the curb and beaten with flag poles. Finally, when order was slowly being restored and the attack had failed, he took to the airways and grudgingly ordered his attackers to go home, but not before telling them that he loved them …

He told them that he loved them.

That nothing was done about the attack still burns holes in our stomachs. We voted for change in 2020, yes, but also voted for justice that was never delivered.

I will speak for myself here, but I will never forgive Joe Biden or his attorney general for this. There is nothing you can tell me that will quash my rage. For four years, I wrote endless pieces, and implored Merrick Garland TO DO SOMETHING, because if he didn’t the lawless, dead-inside Trump would emerge stronger, and set his beady eyes on getting even with the patriots who had the audacity to stand up against him and his odious party.

Nothing was done, and once again we were right: The 300 lb. cockroach survived and emerged from the corner of his garish country club in Florida to finish us off.

When Biden welcomed Trump back to our White House in front of that crackling fire just one week after the 2024 election, I never wanted to lay eyes on him again. He pardoned his family, and left the rest of us to fend for ourselves.

I shake typing that, I really do.

Since that sinful day, we have done what we can, while every awful thing we said would come to pass — and more —has played out in front of our tired eyes.

We watched as Trump attacked our government and gorged himself with our money …innocent people were rounded up and murdered in our streets by masked men … troops were sent off to die for his profit … landmark voting legislation was incinerated by his bought-off Supreme Court … our air, water and animals were purposely poisoned just to make another buck …

But we are still standing.

We did not submit.

We rolled out of the rack each day, rallied, and did what little we could do to keep the fire burning, and hope alive.

We are the true patriots in America and would have voted every single Republican out Tuesday whether gas prices were $2 a gallon or $5 a gallon ... Whether we were in some dangerous, idiotic war with Iran or not … Whether our healthcare benefits were in jeopardy or not …

We understand right from wrong.

We are the people who are not ready to move on from Donald Trump’s attack on our country January 6, 2021, and all the harm he has done to this nation, and never will be.

This is not about the price of eggs, it is about the terrible price we will continue to pay, if we can’t put down this fascist regime.

We will not quit fighting, raging, and working until freedom rings, because by God, THIS WILL HAPPEN.

A slow death is too good for Trump. I want to see him beaten. I want to see the fear in those beady eyes when he has nowhere to run and nowhere to hide but that dirty country club corner.

This can only happen if we prevail at the polls on Tuesday.

We have been through a helluva lot, because we have allowed ourselves to feel all of it. We have not backed down. We have not tuned it out. We have served our country like very few generations before us, by fighting a dangerous, homegrown enemy of America who aims to end us.

No matter what happens Tuesday, and I do believe we are in for a historic night, I want you to know this, my fighting friends:

You were on the right side of the fight.

I can pay you no higher compliment.

Now let’s go win this thing.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and awarding-winning journalist, who headed newsrooms, and worked as a reporter in the newspaper business for decades. You can find all his work here.

End of 'bellyaching': Trump's swamp talk becomes a nightmare

President Donald Trump ran for president in 2016 by promising to "drain the swamp," a reference to the rampant corruption in Washington that a supposed outsider like Trump would clean up. Flash forward a decade and, according to one journalist, Trump hasn't only failed to drain the swamp; he has made it far swampier than ever.

Importantly for everyone in American politics, voters are noticing — in a big way.

"Fox News poll released in mid-October found that “corruption in government” was voters’ top concern—above inflation, gas prices, and health care," wrote The New Yorker's Ruth Marcus on Sunday. "Eighty-eight per cent said that they were “extremely” or “very” concerned about it. Corruption “has steadily gained in importance on the list of the most critical issues facing the country,” Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster, said. “I never remember corruption as an issue being as important as it is now.”"

Marcus added, "Corruption is always a tempting message for the party out of power. Donald Trump used that playbook in 2016, vowing to drain the Washington swamp. Bemoaning corruption is risk-free: no voters are in favor of it, even if they have differing interpretations of what the term entails. In the meantime, hitting corruption lets the opposition party duck the harder tasks of producing a detailed legislative agenda. But, in this cycle, what could catapult the issue from a topic of chronic bellyaching to an actual mechanism for changing votes is the gloomy economic climate. Voters who are feeling flush may be willing to tolerate a degree of self-dealing from politicians that becomes insupportable when grocery bills are high."

She continued that "corruption “is always a useful word, but it’s more effective at some times than others,” Robert Boatright, a political-science professor at Clark University and the co-author of the 2025 book “American Corruption Talk,” noted. “It’s a way to put your finger on people’s general dissatisfaction with our politicians, with our economy, with the state of the world.”"

From there Marcus went on to detail how Democrats are spending money focusing on Trump's corruption in key Senate races like North Carolina, Maine and Texas.

Republicans have also admitted that their party is, whether due to corruption or the economy or other reasons, seemingly doomed in the upcoming midterms.

“We’ve got a week left and we’re forced to talk about Mississippi,” Republican Party corruption former Trump Communications director Bryan Lanza told CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday. “I've been in politics for nearly 30 years. I don't think we've ever talked about Mississippi in a general election. And here's where we are.”

In October, former President Bill Clinton's Labor Secretary Robert Reich wrote for AlterNet that prices are going up in part because of the tariffs. "The tariffs are import taxes that have increased annual household costs by an estimated $1,100, according to The Budget Lab at Yale."

He continued, "Again, though, the price increases tell only half the story. Trump’s tariffs have enabled Trump to give out tariff waivers and carve-outs to industries and companies that do him favors."

The legal trap waiting to snap shut on the Trump administration

With the midterms upon us, the nation is on edge. Political analysts, writers, and resistance organizers are jittery and leery, aware that our efforts may not be enough.

People who read beyond the headlines understand that we’re at the fork, a pivotal moment that will take the nation in one direction…. or another. They also know that an adjudicated insurrectionist who assembled an armed mob to cling to power the last time he lost is at it again, only this time he’s more dangerous.

The J6 tinderbox has grown larger and more flammable, thanks to Congressional inaction, because the insurrectionist has now formed his own Praetorian Guard and commands the U.S. military. A looming unknown is: what percentage of U.S. service members will take their oath to the Constitution seriously enough to refuse to follow any illegal commands? How many would shoot protesting Americans if a roided-out, dry drunk SecDef gave the order?

A master of reality TV and little else, Trump manufactured an early fraud narrative with no supporting evidence to blunt his midterm losses. Claiming that immigrants and Democrats are fraudulently voting, Trump then instructed his own supporters to cheat, and to vote whether they’ve registered or not.

Democratic control of one or both congressional houses, as is now projected, will check Trump’s corruption from all sides. A Democratic Party majority will quickly investigate the billions the Trumps have pocketed, curtail Hegseth’s unhinged remake of the military, and rein in oligarchic self-dealing. It’s no mystery why Trump has dialed illegal election interference to 11.

Trump’s unprecedented attacks on the midterms have exhausted voters already too tired to keep track. His multi-pronged assault ran the gamut of un-American tricks including bribery, seizing ballots, threats to deploy armed agents, attempts to change mail-in voting laws, gerrymandering, threats to imprison election officials, nonstop lawsuits, and, looming large, election disinformation. Even though the Constitution grants control over elections to the states, Trump can’t stop grabbing at that power with his own sticky fingers, and his instincts will get worse before they get better.

Trump has converted the DOJ into an election interference pitbull. After the Supreme Court slapped down his efforts to control mail-in voting, Trump got busy attacking the justices and suing individual states. Last week the DOJ sued to try to pre-emptively block the certification of Alaska’s Senate race but only if Trump’s candidate loses in a close race to Democrat candidate Mary Peltola.

Peltola’s emergency motion to dismiss points out that the DOJ is interfering on Trump’s behalf, “raising issues governed exclusively by state law that were (already) resolved by the Alaska Supreme Court months ago.” As of this writing, Peltola’s motion remains pending and is expected to be granted.

Trump similarly tried to force California and Washington State to disrupt their vote counts by seeking to “set aside vote-by-mail ballots from persons identified by the Federal Government likely to be noncitizens.” An appeals court dismissed the California suit on October 26, and Washington officials refused Trump’s request on October 28, in part because Trump’s “lists of ineligible voters” are inaccurate by the DOJ’s own admission.

Courts have blocked most of Trump’s efforts to insert himself into the midterms. The primary source of constitutional authority to regulate congressional elections is the Elections Clause found at Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution. That clause empowers states — not the federal government, not the president — to determine the “Times, Places and Manner” of holding elections.

In addition, the Fourteenth Amendment protects the fundamental right to vote, barring states from imposing substantial burdens on the right unless those burdens advance free elections. Laws requiring people to register prior to voting, or requiring them to vote at assigned places, are deemed reasonable under the Elections Clause. A president seizing state voter lists would not be reasonable, because there is no foundational authority under which the executive branch can control state-run elections to begin with.

Trump’s DOJ began demanding states’ voter registration lists and confidential voter data nonetheless in May 2025. States controlled by both parties refused to turn them over, and the DOJ sued. As of Sept. 30, the initial cases against Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin have all been dismissed.

Across the U.S., tens of thousands of volunteers, poll workers, and concerned citizens have stepped forward to help protect the midterms. For the first time in our nation’s history, election officials are teaching them what to do if armed federal agents or soldiers show up, even though their presence at the polls is prohibited under federal law. On top of threatening to send armed ICE agents and the military, Trump’s DOJ is sending an unprecedented number of agents, (over 1,000) to “observe and monitor” voting in high-population areas in every state, and election workers are preparing for when agents try to intimidate voters, as recently happened in Wyoming.

As Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows recently observed, “This is the first time ever that we have had to engage in scenario planning to safeguard against potential federal interference in elections. It seems like the federal government is now adversarial to the states.”

It doesn’t just seem like it. Trump doesn’t recognize state authority over elections or anything else, just as he doesn’t recognize congressional authority, Supreme Court authority, or the law of the land. Ignorant of U.S. history and all things un-filigreed, Trump’s zookeepers have allowed him to think he is the law.

Back when Republicans protected something other than pedophiles and graft, states’ rights were the holy grail of limited federal power. Now conservatives have sacrificed their principles to the pursuit of unchecked power, and states’ rights are a quaint memory.

The only solution, for now, is to vote and make sure everyone you know does the same. Next steps will be determined by the outcome, and how the cornered rat reacts to it.

Trump's strategy just imploded as Bill Clinton’s ominous warning comes to life

An unprecedented surge in Black voter turnout across the American South is fundamentally reshaping the 2026 midterm political landscape. This massive, highly localized mobilization is defying traditional non-presidential voting patterns and threatening to turn what was expected to be a standard midterm election cycle into a "Blue Tsunami" for Democrats, breaking open what were previously considered safe Republican strongholds.

According to extensive reporting by POLITICO Magazine, the catalyst for this dramatic shift stems from deep-seated voter frustration with President Donald Trump's return to power. Specifically, African American voters and community leaders have been galvanized by two major actions: the White House-led effort to aggressively dilute minority-heavy voting districts to benefit the GOP, and the Supreme Court’s subsequent gutting of the Voting Rights Act. Former President Bill Clinton noted that these historically discriminated-against groups possess an "uncanny feel detector," interpreting the recent redistricting pushes as a direct, punitive attempt to strip them of their hard-won political representation.

The visual evidence of this resistance is sweeping across states like Mississippi, Texas, Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida. High-profile Democratic figures—such as Jon Ossoff in Georgia—are drawing massive, multi-generational crowds in traditionally deep-red territory. In places like Tyler and Texarkana, Texas, voters explicitly linked their motivation to memories of the Civil Rights era, noting that modern legislative efforts look exactly like classic voter suppression. Local officials and community organizers have admitted that communities intentionally "camouflaged" their quiet organizing to avoid defensive GOP counter-maneuvers, opting to let Republicans believe Black voters were simply apathetic until it was too late to counteract the wave.

The early and absentee voting data indicates that this hidden wave is now fully exposed, creating a structural panic for conservative campaigns. Republican strategists are facing a "dire scenario" as early data reveals that Black Southerners are voting at a rate outpacing the overall electorate. GOP candidate vulnerabilities have been severely compounded by a souring national political environment, underwhelming conservative campaigns, and a slight bleeding of support among moderate white voters. While kitchen-table issues like the cost of living remain a primary driver for all demographics, working-class Black communities feel uniquely targeted by the administration's healthcare cuts, inflation, tariffs, and foreign policy strains.

Ultimately, this historic turnout has expanded the competitive playing field to an unprecedented degree. If these turnout trends hold through Election Day, they could completely break the Republican party's electoral lock on massive Sun Belt prizes like Texas and Florida, fundamentally upending the balance of power in Washington.

GOP’s final dash to pass Trump’s agenda set to crash into reality

Because Democrats are expected to win back one or both houses of Congress in the upcoming midterms, President Donald Trump is faced with the prospect of being a lame duck. Now a new report reveals what congressional Republicans do — and do not — plan on doing in light of this impending setback.

"Republicans on Capitol Hill are poised to clash in the lame duck over how far to push President Trump’s agenda," reported The Hill's Helen Huiskes, Sudiksha Kochi and Mike Lillis on Sunday. "Midterm voters are widely expected to give Democrats control of the House, and maybe the Senate, in the next Congress, which would bring Trump’s legislative agenda to a screeching halt beginning next year."

The journalists added, "That scenario is setting off alarm bells among one camp of Republicans pushing to extend the post-election session to maximize the passage of GOP policies while they still have the power to do so. That includes a so-called reconciliation package designed to move partisan priorities without the need for any Democratic support."

Although some Republicans want to push through a reconciliation bill before January 2027 if Democrats reclaim Congress, The Hill is skeptical that this will actually work out.

"That strategy is likely to run into a brick wall, however, if Republicans are clobbered in the elections, and deflated GOP lawmakers lose their appetite to stick around Washington for too long afterwards, especially as the December holidays get closer," Huiskes, Kochi and Lillis wrote. "Those dynamics might be most pronounced in the House, where Republicans face the longest odds of keeping their majority, and attendance problems could undermine the party’s ability to move legislation."

Not everyone thinks Trump will become a lame duck if Democrats retake Congress. In December, Republican strategist Douglas Heye offered the alternative point of view.

"I'd also caution folks here because, you know, so often we've started to see people talk about Donald Trump as a lame duck president. Stop that. Donald Trump — we know — we've said so many times he defies the laws of political gravity. He's not like any other president. So why would this one thing make him like any other president? He's never going to go gracefully into that good night," Heye speculated.

He even said that this could hurt whichever Republican runs for president in 2028.

"And if you're JD Vance or you're Marco Rubio, whomever the nominee may be, you have to be mindful that Donald Trump can make news at any moment just because he wants to do so. And he does that very effectively," Heye pointed out.

A damning new report targeting Trump is being met with near-total silence

I am going to tell you why I think the Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee released on Monday a 53-page report presenting new evidence of Donald Trump’s involvement in Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-crime syndicate, efforts by the Department of Justice to cover it up, and the Democrats' call for a special counsel. But before I do, let me quote the report directly.

Why? Because it's important when evidence suggests the president of the United States lied about his involvement with the world's most notorious child-sex trafficker, and because the Washington press corps had decided to meet the moment with a collective shrug.

As Ana Marie Cox said, with appropriate outrage, "the New York Times and Washington Post, and all the major cable networks, have covered CheesecakeGate more thoroughly ... (A search of the media monitoring service Snapstream showed the three major cable news networks combined mentioned the rape allegation against Trump just twice, whereas the word 'cheesecake' has received 368 mentions in the same span.)"

So, as a public service, here are some quotes:

A growing body of evidence demonstrates that Donald Trump was an active participant in Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of young women during the mid-to-late 1990s. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are doing everything they can to keep the American people in the dark about it. ...
The evidence, much of it still hiding behind redactions in DOJ vaults, shows that Trump lied about kicking Epstein out of his Mar-a-Lago club and strongly suggests that Epstein introduced Trump to his wife Melania. The evidence demonstrates that Trump has lied about the nature and extent of his relationship with Epstein dozens of times—incriminating behavior for someone who supposedly has nothing to hide. ...
Above all, the actual evidence we have seen — as shared in the accounts and stories of 11 women, each described below — indicates that Trump abused, assaulted, and even raped numerous women alongside, and in coordination with, the most infamous sex trafficker in history.
These stories are united by time, place, and the distinct factual similarities in how Trump and Epstein pursued, manipulated, and abused these women. With one exception, these accounts of sexual assault and conspiracy involve episodes that took place between 1992 and 1997 in New York City and Palm Beach, at a time when Trump and Epstein were ‘close friends’ and participated in a shadowy subculture organized around young female modeling.
Witnesses speak consistently of modeling pageants and parties where young women and girls were forced into predatory situations and routinely taken advantage of, abused, and raped. They give similar accounts of the competitive and sinister relationship between Epstein and Trump and how it was channeled into their shared pursuit of young women.
Taken together, the evidence provided by the stories of these 11 women, and the documentary evidence that supports and corroborates their stories, indisputably meets and surpasses FBI’s standard for opening a full investigation: that “activity constituting a federal crime … may have occurred."

Julie K Brown, the Miami Herald reporter who knows more than anyone about all things Epstein, said yesterday that much of the material in the report comes from public records and documents released after passage late last year of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Brown said what’s new is an allegation from a former beauty contestant from Switzerland by the name of Beatrice Keul. She told the committee that Jeffrey Epstein arranged a meeting with Trump at the time one of his pageants. She said he raped her in 1993 in New York.

Here's the key part of the report:

Later that day, Donald Trump’s representative invited Keul to go upstairs at the Plaza Hotel to meet with Trump. Believing this meeting to be a lucky break for the purpose of furthering her career and education, Keul accompanied Trump’s representative upstairs. He ushered her into the suite, where upon entering, Trump reportedly grabbed Keul from behind and forcibly raped her; in the process, tearing her dress and causing bleeding and bruising on multiple parts of her body. Keul described the rape as ‘brutal.’ Following the assault, according to Keul’s report, Trump sat her on the edge of the bed, repeated his promises to arrange for a visa and NYU admission, and made her promise she would keep quiet, saying, “[T]he show must go on.”

The report said Keul is one of five women to directly accuse the president of "raping or sexually assaulting them in Epstein’s company or direct physical presence":

• Beatrice Keul, whose account is comprehensively set forth for the first time in this report, credibly alleges that Trump violently raped her at a November 1993 pageant at the Plaza Hotel in New York City and that Epstein, Trump, and others used this pageant as a “hunting ground” to prey on vulnerable young women and girls;
• Stacey Williams, who offered a detailed and corroborated account of Trump sexually assaulting her in the early 1990s while she was alone with him and Epstein in an office at Trump Tower;
• Jill Harth, who has also publicly detailed Trump aggressively pursuing and violently sexually assaulting her and another woman in 1994 at a Mar-a-Lago party where Epstein and Trump were the only men present;
• Katie Johnson, who gave FBI a detailed account of her repeated rape at the hands of Trump and Epstein in 1994 in New York City when she was a minor; and
• A Jane Doe, who offered FBI a graphic account of Trump assaulting her when she was a minor in the mid-1980s in New York by forcibly pushing her head down to his exposed penis.

That's the what. As to why the Judiciary Democrats released the report, the reason isn't what you think. It isn't because there's a midterm next week. It's no October Surprise. It is not going to change the election's outcome. That's why the press corps is ignoring it. The ghastly substance of it – evidence of violent sex crimes against women and girls by the president – doesn't matter enough. It would be news if it affected an election. It won't. So it's not news.

But the report is a kind of preview. This is what we can expect from a House controlled by the Democrats in the two years leading up to the next presidential election. Impeachment is still a question, but there is no downside to subjecting Trump to endless grinding exposure. The weaker he gets politically, the more cracks there will be in his coalition. If you think he's unpopular now, wait until Robert Garcia, the Judiciary's ranking Democrat, gets going.

But I don't want to get lost in the politics. These are real people. These are real crimes against them. They should see justice. More broadly, we cannot hope for our republic to survive if elites like Trump, who act with impunity for the law and morality, are allowed to carry on without fear of accountability. Trump will probably never see a jail cell (he's 80, after all) but he is not alone. Many elites enabled him along the way, because they thought something was in it for them. There must be a price for impunity, and someone must pay it.

This report isn't going to affect the election. It's not going to bring justice. And it's certainly not going to restore law and order. But I hope it's the first of many steps toward that end.

Abdul El-Sayed was confronted recently by a man known as Tommy. Tommy wanted Michigan's Democratic Senate candidate to disavow Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood. The implicit allegation is AES is in cahoots with the terrorist organization, because he's Muslim and his lineage is Egyptian, and if he does not disavow them, then he's one of them.

In the video below, you can see AES turn Tommy's religious bigotry into an opportunity to remind everyone of the meaning of the First Amendment. He deftly turns things around so that he, the Muslim, is the defender of religious freedom while Tommy, the self-identified Christian, would rather codify his faith into law. Takeaway: Who's the real radical here?

The video went viral and provoked a flurry of online commentary. One of the best commentaries was Reverend Dan Schultz's. He's a Wisconsin pastor, contributor to the Editorial Board, and my pal. His 14 points are reproduced here with his kind permission.

  1. El-Sayed was definitely prepared for that kind of question from that kind of questioner, but he also was able to take advantage of a couple of big holes in GOP strategy, such as it is.
  2. The premise of Tommy's attempt at a gotcha question was based in Christian nationalism, sure, but even more so in Christian normalism, ie, the assumption that "normal" voters are Christians.
  3. The "nationalism" part comes in the further assumption that normal Christians reject Islam as antithetical to their faith, and want conservative Christian values written into governance.
  4. There's more, too: the question seems designed to tap into fears about Michigan's rapidly-growing Arab population, and tap into out-state resentment of the Detroit metro area.
  5. I don't think Tommy thought he was going to turn the room against El-Sayed. More likely, he was trying to get El-Sayed to commit some gaffe that could be shared on social media — but there's a reason people like Tommy pull these stunts in towns like Caro, not Dearborn.
  6. What Tommy may not have known is that many of Michigan's Arabs are in fact Christians, maybe up to half of them. So it's hard to other them on that score.
  7. And while this crowd seemed to be mostly El-Sayed supporters, it doesn't seem like anyone was too inclined to othering, on the basis of religion, or race, or geography. I heard some pretty loud cheering for El-Sayed's repeated "or no faith."
  8. The conservative base seems to have convinced themselves that most voters share their biases and preferences. That might have worked in 1980s Michigan, and in 2024 Michigan, voters might have ignored the nationalism in hopes of getting a better economy.
  9. But in 2026, Republicans have failed so dismally on the economy and, well, any other kind of governance that it's easy for voters to see that all they've got is the white Christian nationalism.
  10. That gives someone like El-Sayed the opening to speak and react confidently. He knows Tommy's coming at him with a bluff and a weak hand. The only people who care about him rejecting the Muslim Brotherhood aren't going to vote for him anyway, so he doesn't have to dodge or weave. He can just attack.
  11. And attack he does, brilliantly. I thought the bit about the Constitution was great, not because it's a secular counterweight to Christian chauvinism, but because El-Sayed framed it perfectly as a neutral operating system that Americans buy into as the rules of the game.
  12. That's the real weight of his counterpunch: not that Tommy is a bigot (though he kind of is), but that Tommy won't agree to play by the same set of rules he demands El-Sayed play by. Who's the outlier here?
  13. Anyway, none of this is brilliant or original insight. It's just helpful in understanding the corner Republicans have painted themselves into, in Michigan and nationally. They have fundamentally misunderstood the electorate, and it may cost them for a really long time to come.
  14. To be pithy about it, if you're going to run the "divide and conquer" flim-flam, you have to convince the marks there's something in it for them. The GOP can't do that, which leaves the opening for somebody like El-Sayed to expose the con for what it is.

Massive reckoning awaits Trump's allies as former officials warn henchmen

President Donald Trump's attorney general, Todd Blanche, has frequently indicated that he plans on meddling in the midterm elections per his boss' desires. Now a conservative columnist is calling him out — not only for this, but for his other alleged abuses of power.

After reviewing Trump's and Blanche's ongoing and/or unsuccessful attempts to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey, his daughter Maurene Comey and former Trump official Cassidy Hutchinson, conservative columnist David French wrote for The New York Times on Sunday that "I’m going to stop there, but even as I do, I feel as if I’m misleading you. I’m stopping because of space, not because that’s the end of the outrages. In case after case after case, the Department of Justice is targeting Trump opponents, making frivolous arguments and engaging in vindictive, meritless prosecutions."

He added, "I blame Trump, but I also blame Blanche. He doesn’t understand his own job. We all know that Trump has an extreme view of executive power that renders him a virtual elected monarch. His administration’s actions extend well beyond conventional “unitary executive theory,” which puts a premium on presidential control over the executive branch. He treats the law as his plaything, deciding on his own whim which laws will be enforced and which ones will not."

French continued, "It is true that the president is the boss of every cabinet official. He can fire them at will. But it is also true that the attorney general is different from every other member of the cabinet. Unlike, say, Pete Hegseth, Blanche has three masters, not one. The attorney general and all the lawyers working for him also answer to the judiciary, which not only decides the cases he brings; it also governs the conduct of D.O.J. officials in court. And he also answers to the bar — rules of ethics are binding on every attorney, including government attorneys."

Earlier in October, former Trump Homeland Security official Miles Taylor wrote that "to Trump’s henchmen, let me offer a friendly reminder before you move to decertify election results or prevent the peaceful transfer of power: the man you’re doing this for is putting you at risk… he doesn’t care about you… and even if he did, he cannot save you from accountability."

Also earlier in October, liberal commentator Steven Harper warned that "Blanche might consider this: Trump is a fickle friend who can quickly become a fierce foe."

He continued, "In the near term, he’s angling to thwart the midterm elections in which Republicans are poised to lose President Donald Trump’s death grip on Congress. In the long run, the nation will bear the consequences of his weaponization of the Justice Department for years to come."

Trump’s Epstein file blunder just raised ‘Pizzagate’ from the dead

President Donald Trump has, through his bungling of disclosing the Jeffrey Epstein files, managed to keep alive a discredited conspiracy theory involving child sex abuse — namely, the Pizzagate scandal.

The Pizzagate scandal is the disproved claim that Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign was a child sex trafficking ring that used the Washington DC pizzeria Comet Ping Pong to perform its activities. After Comet Ping Pong was attacked by a gunman (no one was hurt), it seemed the conspiracy theory was too taboo to reenter the American mainstream. Yet according to a conspiracy theory expert, Trump's refusal to fully release the Epstein files has added fuel to the Pizzagate fire.

"That is because reality has continued to give Pizzagate more material," journalist, author and conspiracy theory expert Anna Merlan wrote for The New York Times on Sunday. "The #MeToo movement came less than a year after the shooting at Comet, and soon stories of the elite and powerful engaging in unchecked sexual abuse were seemingly everywhere. No one exemplified this culture of impunity better than Mr. Epstein. In 2008 he pleaded guilty to state charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution in a sweetheart deal that helped him avoid federal prosecution. He spent the next decade cavorting with top businessmen, academics, entertainers and politicians who shamelessly pursued his money and social clout while evidence and allegations of his sexual abuse grew."

Merlan continued, "The flight logs for Mr. Epstein’s private jet — Mr. Clinton, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., then-Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, Mr. Trump — seemed to confirm the “deep state” that conspiracists saw everywhere. Bill Gates flew on another of his private jets and had conversations with him from 2011 to 2014, well after Mr. Epstein’s conviction. The social associations between Mr. Epstein and people in the upper echelons of power were confirmation of one piece of the Pizzagate worldview: that the elite know and protect one another."

As recently as last year, Republicans fending off inquiries into the Epstein files have tried to deflect by bringing up Pizzagate.

Per The Huffington Post's Yashar Ali, in December Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) reposted a video from "a conspiracy theorist who regularly spreads neo-Nazi propaganda." The conspiracy theorist, Ian Carroll, wrote that "the 'Pizzagate' conspiracy came out way before the Epstein revelations came out." He then elaborated, "Am I, like, way out of line to say that Epstein is pretty solid evidence that there might be some child trafficking going on with elites? Right? Like, is that too far out there?"

Reposting the video, Lee added, "What comes to mind first when you hear that mainstream-news media sources have 'debunked' a particular 'conspiracy theory'? I don’t know this guy, but he asks some legitimate questions. Watch the video and see for yourself."

Robert Reich issues scorching reality check on Trump's 'incessant lies'

Donald (“pretend-I’m-on-the-ballot”) Trump has made this election into a referendum on him. Good.

He is a historic anomaly whose election to the highest office in the land — twice! — will forever be a stain on the judgment of the American people. A president who lies incessantly; who generates fear and fuels hatefulness; who viciously attacks the free press, political opponents, and all who disagree with him; who uses his office for personal gain; and who cozies up to dictators such as Vladimir Putin while turning against our historic friends, such as Canada.

For the sake of our democracy and our future, we must send a clear signal on Tuesday that we find Trump repugnant. A rejection beyond mere repudiation. A clear vote of no confidence.

While Trump and his Republican enablers have manufactured false threats to America — Americans who are Muslim, Mexican Americans, Latino Americans, transgender Americans, fraudulent voters, “globalists” — they dismiss the real threats to America that are growing worse by the day: climate change; widening inequalities of income, wealth, and political power; unregulated AI; and the most expensive and least effective healthcare system in the world.

We must get back to work on what is critical to our future.

Every branch of the federal government is now under the control of the Republican Party, and the Republican Party is under the control of Trump. Unless constrained, he and they will be emboldened — to eliminate what’s left of the Affordable Care Act, to further cut Medicare and Medicaid, to eviscerate Social Security, to give even more tax cuts to the rich and large corporations.

The Republican Party has lost its right to govern. It once stood for a set of ideas that, while not always appropriate to America’s needs, at least gave the party some reason for being: states’ rights, free trade, and fiscal prudence. Now it stands for nothing but Trumpism.

It is time to renounce the hatemongering and race-baiting that has engulfed this nation.

It is time to affirm that we are a tolerant and courageous people — not the bigots and fearful cowards Trump and the Republicans have made us out to be.

It is time to lead the world again, not pretend we can isolate ourselves from it. Our greatness isn’t found in the color of our skin or the uniformity of our ethnicity. It is found in our dedication to democracy, equality of opportunity, tolerance of others, and freedom.

It is time to throw the bums out.

Vote Tuesday as if your life and the lives of those you love depend on it.

They do.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

Trump's White House becoming a 'bloody' pressure cooker as the end looms

The Trump White House is descending into a "bloody" pressure cooker, according to a one-time biographer of the president, with everyone out to get as much as they can "while the getting is good" before things come to a grinding halt.

Michael Wolff is a longtime author and reporter, best known for his extensive coverage of President Donald Trump's political career, including several books about his chaotic first term in the White House. In the latest episode of his Daily Beast podcast, "Inside Trump's Head," Wolff and co-host Joanna Coles at one point discussed the scandal surrounding Trump's former personal attorney and failed U.S. Attorney attack dog, Alina Habba Mildon, who received a $50 million contract to serve as general counsel for the family of a Venezuelan billionaire, shortly before a member of the family received a clemency deal from the White House.

As Wolff argued, the Trump White House has been behaving like any other authoritarian government, with a bunch of bit players using access to the "central power in the middle" to make money or pursue other personal goals.

"But that's what so many other people around Donald Trump are also doing," Wolff explained. "And this is going to get more intense as... the end comes for the Trump administration. And... the feeling may be that it is ending much sooner [than anticipated], with Tuesday's election... that everybody is going to be so much more focused on getting what they can while the getting is good, which is going to increase the pressure, increase the resentment, increase the competition around Trump. And it's going to be bloody."

On the subject of impending GOP doom in the midterms, Wolff suggested that Trump's recent attempt to back out of several planned rallies might have come down to him getting tired, and the fact that "if he decides he doesn't want to do it, it's very hard to get him to do it."

"It's very hard to get him to focus. I mean, you don't tell Trump what to do," Wolff said. "And, and if he got to the point of saying, I don't want to do this anymore, then you don't do it."

He continued: "Now, in this case, he was pressured. I mean, the entire Republican Party comes and says, 'Come on... We're really in an every last vote situation. I mean, you have one job, Mr. President, and that's to get your base to come out and vote'... You're certainly not going to change the minds, at this point, of Democrats or independents or people who have once voted for you and now hate you."

NYT columnist rips Trump's fraud claim: 'A fake problem made up by losers'

A prominent New York Times columnist pulled no punches while discussing President Donald Trump's main new pretense for election meddling, calling out the White House for harping on about "a fake problem made up by losers."

In a recent edition of his "Takes" video series on YouTube, liberal NYT columnist Jamelle Bouie discussed the Trump administration's recent attempt to target "noncitizen voters," with a new demand that California purge names of suspected noncitizens from its ballot prior to the election. The state's government hit back, claiming that there would be no way to inspect the voter rolls in time for Election Day, and that trying to do so would inevitably result in law-abiding voters getting purged by mistake.

Bouie argued that there was no merit to this line of attack from Trump, accusing the administration of merely trying to prop up an excuse to delegitimize the eventual results out of California after the midterms. More to the point, however, he also went scorched earth against the idea that noncitizen voting was anything close to a real problem, let alone one warranting a massive mobilization by the federal government.

"I think it's actually very reasonable for someone who isn't paying a ton of attention and doesn't know a ton to assume that the U.S. has a problem with non-citizens voting in federal elections, but I'm here to tell you that that's wrong. Just completely and totally wrong," Bouie explained. "Over the last decade, any number of groups, organizations and the like have done detailed studies of non-citizen voting, trying to find out what is the actual amount of non-citizen voting that happens in the United States, and the consistent answer no matter who you ask is that there is effectively none. Statistically equivalent to zero."

He continued: "I use those terms effectively and statistically zero because it's important to remember that in any given election year there are tens of millions of votes being cast; in a presidential election year, those numbers are north of a hundred and fifty 160 million votes. And so when you have that many people voting in that many places, there is bound to be some instance of something, basically anything. The question is whether it's prevalent, whether it's common, whether it happens at a frequency high enough that would justify actions that might disenfranchise completely legal voters and the answer to that question is no; it doesn't. It happens so infrequently that it's effectively the same as it not happening at all."

Bouie further cited a 2016 study from the Brennan Center for Justice, which found that out of around 23.5 million votes cast in 42 jurisdictions, only about 30 instances of non-citizen voting could be found, a percentage that of the total votes cast that was ultimately negligible, and far from a trend that could meaningfully shift a race.

"My odds right now of being struck by lightning three times in a row, higher than the rate of non-citizen voting, according to [the conservative Heritage Foundation's] data," Bouie added.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.