cia

MAGA senator Trump betrayed seems to endorse Dem James Talarico

When President Donald Trump betrayed Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) by endorsing his primary rival, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, in the latter's ultimately-successful intraparty challenge, experts speculated that the president may have politically hit himself in the face. The reasoning was that Cornyn was both electable in Texas and a diehard MAGA loyalist, while Paxton — though also hardcore MAGA — is weighed down by a number of financial and personal scandals.

Now there is another race that may go to the Democrats because of Cornyn's resentment toward the president, at least if Cornyn's retweeting of a pro-Democrat post is any indication.

On Wednesday night Cornyn retweeted a post of an editorial by Republican consultant Karl Rove which said "Why I'm Voting for a Texas Democrat by @KarlRove." Later he quoted from the editorial in a separate tweet that ”The GOP’s stables need a cleaning. This is a good place to start.“ In response journalist Molly Jong-Fast asked "Are you?" while economist Catherine Rampell posted a pair of interested eyes. The Independent's Eric Michael Garcia asked "Cornyn reposts Karl Rove's op-ed about voting for Rosenthal over Bo French. Sooooo, is Cornyn going to vote for Rosenthal too?"

By contrast, some conservatives were angry at Cornyn. Right-wing commentator Benny Johnson wrote "the sitting 'Republican' Senator of Texas, who lost by 27+ points in his primary, is now telling people to vote Democrat. Spineless. Your own voters rejected you. Now you're endorsing the party whose beliefs are antithetical to what Texans stand for. Pure betrayal. This is why we lose." Similarly right-wing influencer Jack Posobiec commented, "And there it is." Meanwhile former Trump Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services Michael Caputo wrote that Cornyn "will not be missed."

Cornyn and Rove are endorsing Democratic Texas Railroad Commissioner nominee Jon Rosenthal over Republican Bo French because French recently posted a racist comment about University of Texas students on social media.

"In one post," recently reported The New York Times' McGaughy. "Mr. French described South Asian students at the school as 'foreigners' who had 'displaced' Americans at the state's flagship university. Mr. French's posts struck a chord in a way his anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim comments have not before. The messages threatened to fracture the Texas Republicans' attempts at solidarity and tested their willingness to criticize one of their own — just weeks before midterm voting begins. Mr. French denied his posts were racist and threw the blame back on Republicans who didn't fully support his message."

McGaughy continued, "The posts have also given Democrats renewed hope to win a statewide office in Texas for the first time in a generation. While much of the national focus has been on the U.S. Senate race against Mr. Paxton, the scandal-plagued attorney general running against James Talarico, state party officials believe Mr. French and another anti-immigrant hardliner, Don Huffines, are particularly vulnerable. The hardliners on the Republican slate may help Democrats in other races as well."

'Juvenile': Trump aide rages that voters don't care about his name on things

President Donald Trump’s dogged insistence to put his name on a memorial built to honor a different president appears more and more difficult to defend. One by one, even Trump’s own strategists and Republican allies are warning him to surrender what looks like a “juvenile” crusade.

Trump’s own strategist, David Urban, was no less judgmental while speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper Wednesday night.

“Right. There's no way to defend the Kennedy Center piece or some of these other moves,” said Urban, who worked for Trump in his first term. “The president needs to pivot from what he's doing and get back to talking about what people around the kitchen table care about. I guarantee you, nobody in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, gives one hoot about the Kennedy Center, either way.”

“They care about gas prices. They care about what that $20 bill in their pocket does for them when they go to the grocery store, or when they go to the pump,” Urban continued. “And the president needs to tell them what he's going to do to make their life better and make that $20 go a little bit further.”

Urban found himself in unfamiliar territory: agreeing with Democratic Strategist Meghan Hays.

“You heard the president say that if the Trump administration doesn't get recognition for the Kennedy Center it’s going to end up being ripped down. Given all the other problems he's facing, does it make any sense to you that he is still fighting this?” Cooper asked Hays.

“No, his priorities are completely misaligned, but I think it's because he knows that he's made some really dumb mistakes when it comes to the economy with the Iran war and tariffs. And he doesn't know how to pivot out of it. So, he's being focused on all these vanity projects,” said Hays. “But what David said: the American people don't care about that. They care about their gas prices and their cost of groceries and how much they're paying for health care and child care. They could care less if their reflecting pool has water in it, or if there's a ballroom at the White House, or if the Kennedy center has his name on it. They literally just want some relief.”

Democratic strategist David Axelrod disagreed with Hays’ argument that Trump’s focus on the wrong priorities is a “pivot.”

“I disagree with Meghan a little. I don't think he's talking about those things to pivot away from the economy. He's interested in vanity projects because it may be because of vanity,” said Axelrod. “… [H]e wants to put his name on things. He can legitimately put his name on the highest diesel prices in history, because he does own that.”

- YouTube youtu.be

'Freaked out' Europeans are moving gold out of the US over Trump: expert

President Donald Trump has made repeated overtures to annex Greenland, despite the overwhelming opposition both within that Danish territory and throughout the rest of the European Union (EU). Now one economist is reporting that the EU may be causing long-term damage to the American economy by moving its gold out of this country — and as a direct result of the United States' actions toward Greenland.

"They've done this because they're worried about what Donald Trump might do to use this against them," economist Catherine Rampell told The Bulwark's Tim Miller on Wednesday. "Now, I don't think he's, like, actually likely to tunnel underground a la Die Hard with a Vengeance and, like, literally steal the gold in dump trucks. But you don't know."

She added, "Like, he did talk about how he wanted to show up at Fort Knox and knock on the door to make sure the gold was still there in case somebody else had stolen it. He literally said that, I think, multiple times. So maybe he would do that. The more likely outcome is that he would basically say we're going to treat the EU, our friends in the European Union, the same way that we're treating Russia. And we're going to say they no longer have access to this."

Rampell continued, "We've frozen Russia's foreign exchange reserves, for example. They might well do the same thing. And by the way, Germany is considering this as well, taking the role back. And Germany had gold here partly because of Cold War reasons. Like it wasn't fleeing the Nazis. It was like making sure that the Soviets couldn't get their mitts on it. In any event, what they're worried about is like, look, there's the whole Liberace stuff within the White House."

The economist concluded, "Maybe we'll have a shortage. I don't think it's actually that. It's like they're freaked out about the invasion of Greenland or the threatened invasion of Greenland. That was a much bigger deal in Europe than American media coverage let on. Like they were totally freaked out about that. They're like, well, if he's threatening to invade a NATO ally, why wouldn't he just expropriate our assets? He talks all the time about how he wants to take the oil or in the case of Venezuela has taken the oil and not just oil, of course."

Miller then pointed out, "Gold? They said they took the gold in Venezuela." Rampell confirmed that this is indeed the case.

Speaking with AlterNet earlier in September, Dr. Richard D. Wolff — professor emeritus of economics at the University of Massachusetts Amherst – broke down exactly why Europe, Canada and other nations threatened by the United States are acting like this.

"I am not surprised that our government is surprised," Wolff wrote. "Our government is busy strong-arming people around the world in every way that it can, militarily, economically, politically, and discovering time after time to their amazement, if you take them seriously, that the folks are going to resist. And that's what's going to happen."

Europe has already vowed to defend Greenland from American aggression.

“We are ready to defend every inch of NATO, including our own territory,” Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told reporters at a NATO summit over the summer. “One of the reasons why we built NATO many, many years ago is if anything happens to one of us then everybody should stand up for each other.”

During that same summit, Icelandic premier Kristrún Frostadóttir declared that “the lines in the sand are clear: Greenland belongs to the people of Greenland."

Fox News veteran delivers harsh reality check to Trump

Fox News chief political analyst Brit Hume sought to spell out in very clear language the problem that President Donald Trump does not appear to be catching — and he did it with some very damning numbers.

On Wednesday, Trump called on the Federal Reserve and his own appointed chair Kevin Warsh to immediately lower interest rates after Warsh announced a rate hike over inflation concerns.

But Hume pointed out the Fed is not the problem, Trump is.

“The Fed is concerned about the same thing that our polling … that came out today suggests the American public is concerned about,” Hume said on Wednesday’s Special Report. “… That’s the issue that helped elect Donald Trump, and I’m talking about inflation. Right now, the question has been raised, ‘Has the Trump administration made the economy better or worse?’ Fully 63 percent say he’s made it worse, and that’s 11 percentage points higher than the number of people who thought that last year.”

Mediaite reports Hume then cited a Fox News survey revealing 62 percent of respondents say grocery prices are a “major problem” for their families, and 61 percent said the same about ballooning gas prices, largely thanks to Trump unilateral war with Iran.

“The president was elected in the hope, I believe, that inflation could be brought under control,” Hume said. “And to some extent on many products it has, but when it comes to gasoline, it reflects on the Iran war, and groceries, which have continued to go up. The problem is worse. And this is plaguing the Republicans … and it’s certainly plaguing the president. And it’s driving down his approval rating.”

The president’s approval rating is very underwater across all polls, reports Mediaite. A UMass survey from August had his approval rating at just 32 percent. In another poll, Mediaite reports Democrats lead Republicans in a generic congressional ballot 51 percent to 43 percent.

Hume said Vice President JD Vance had a point in urging voters to give Republicans “another chance” in November’s midterms.

“Don't give power to the people who caused the problems that we're fixing,” Vance told the audience. “Give us another chance or give us another couple of years to continue to work on the amazing things that we've been doing for the past two years.”

While CNN’s Jake Tapper described Vance’s plea as sounding “like a desperate boyfriend,” Hume said the economy is actually growing, even if voters can’t necessarily feel it.

Jobs are fairly plentiful, he added, and the poverty rate is dropping.

“But this business with prices is just, it’s just killing this administration and the president’s party,” Hume insisted.

Ted Cruz exposes Clarence Thomas’ absolute disdain for legal scholars

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is no stranger to controversy, from the accusation of sexual harassment made by Anita Hill during his confirmation hearing to his consistent support for corporate interests and the revelation that he has accepted gifts from billionaires. Now, in a recent interview, Thomas told an interview that he has no interest in talking to legal experts before rendering his decisions.

"While [Sen. Ted] Cruz [R-TX] laments such unfair treatment, throughout the book he makes the point that Thomas is not particularly bothered by it," reported SCOTUSblog's Randy Maniloff on Wednesday. Maniloff had interviewed Cruz about his recent biography of Thomas, "Going Further." "Asked about this, Cruz told SCOTUSblog, 'He’s a strong man and he knows what he believes. He’s not looking for affirmation from others.' Cruz elaborated by sharing a story of Justice Stephen Breyer asking Thomas if he 'wants to go talk to law professors who were expressing derision toward him.' Thomas replied: 'Steve, no offense, but why would I give a d - - - what those people think.'"

Thomas' comment was particularly striking because, as a self-described constitutional originalist, he should theoretically be very concerned with what experts in the Constitution think about key legal questions. He even admitted as much to Cruz according to Maniloff.

"While Thomas was looking for an education in the law, Cruz explains that he was confronted with professors promoting a doctrine known as 'legal realism,'" Maniloff wrote. "Under this theory, laws did not have to mean what their drafters understood them to mean. Instead, laws were malleable and judges were free to change them if they believed it 'necessary' to do so."

He added, "In search of guidance, Thomas turned to older books about the origins of law and government. Cruz writes that '[w]hat struck him was how different the founders’ world looked from the abstract theories that dominated his classes.' Cruz adds: 'With every book he consumed about the United States and its founders, he became more convinced than ever that his grandfather’s ideas about the world had been correct all along.'"

In fact, Thomas has defied the will of the founding fathers on numerous occasions, most recently in a Supreme Court ruling in which he joined Justice Samuel Alito in a 7-to-2 minority opposing the majority's ruling that Trump could not suppress mail-in voting. The Constitution clearly dictates that elections are controlled by the states, despite Trump's attempts to "nationalize" them to make sure he doesn't lose the 2026 midterms.

"First of all, Clarence Thomas was just on Ted Cruz's podcast openly talking about his conservative values and his distaste and disgust at liberal society and liberal values, right?" Alex Wagner, a journalist who contributes to "The Atlantic" and wrote a book about the Supreme Court called "The Steal," told MS NOW's Chris Hayes on Monday. "That is a justice of the Supreme Court who joins Samuel Alito in this dissent. And I think the most piercing line of the dissent is when Alito writes, 'The plaintiff states invoke the practical effects of implementing the rule post-conventional elections. I take that problem very seriously, but it's not enough to convince me to deny the application.'"

Trump’s going to hate his 'new normal': military veteran

President Donald Trump has suffered a string of defeat in the last few weeks, but veteran, activist and “Independent Americans Podcast” host Paul Rieckhoff, told CNN Wednesday that he should get accustomed to that losing sensation in the weeks leading into November and the remaining two years of his term.

The Supreme Court recently told Trump where to put his attempt to constrict mail in voting, Congress has passed a Russian sanctions bill against a nation led by what Trump considered a friend. And on Wednesday his own appointed Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh voted to raise interest rates despite Trump engaging a year-long war with the former fed chair over the same threat.

To top all that off, the underpowered nation of Iran is beating Trump to a pulp on his economy by launching savvy military attacks that have ballooned global oil prices — assuring that an angry host of voters will be heading to polls in November to punish the party in power, and Trump.

CNN anchor Erin Burnett of “Erin Burnett Out Front” called it “surreal” that Trump claimed his Fed raised rates to “make Trump do as bad as they can possibly do,” as opposed to trying to save his economy from his own bad policies.

To that, Rieckhoff delivered a dose of “real.”

“Here's what's real — and maybe the good news,” said Rieckhoff. “It feels like the system is actually pushing back, right? You've got the fed rate hike, you've got the Supreme Court, you've got [Rep. Thomas] Massie (R-Ky.) Congress [voting to impeach Trump’s secretary of defense], and it feels like the body politic is actually activating its white blood cells to fight against the authoritarian virus that is Trump.”

“It’s like, finally, hooray for some patriotism,” Rieckhoff continued. “People who are putting the country first, our economy, our national security, our best interests, first. And Trump doesn't like it. It makes him feel very uncomfortable. But that might be his new normal for the next couple of months.”

Burnett noted House Speaker Mike Johnson “circling the wagons as quickly as he possible” to protect Trump secretary of defense to avoid “a catastrophe for Trump,” but Rieckoff said this won’t deter Trump from realizing that his grip is slipping.

“He's obviously lost control of the war in Iran. He's lost control of the economy. He's lost control of the Supreme Court. He's lost control of congress. You've got somebody like Massie who could … even leave the Republican Party and be a formidable opponent, and I think we have this this new normal where Trump can't control everything, especially the narrative on things like the economy and the Iran war, which continues to be a sucking chest wound for our military and our economy,” said Rieckoff.

He warned, however, that when Trump realizes he’s losing control is when “he gets his most desperate.”

“He often does a move that is unexpected and even radical. And I think it's not a time to have a failure of imagination,” he concluded.

- YouTube youtu.be

Trump-a-Palooza speech lost to an interview he allegedly tried to censor

President Donald Trump tried to cancel talk show host and comedian Jimmy Kimmel last year, in an effort that boomeranged so badly on him that it helped Kimmel's ratings and even rallied some conservatives against him. Now a political scientist is observing that Trump, apparently learning nothing, may have drawn attention to Kimmel's recent interview with Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico — and, in the process, helped that interview outperform Trump's own midterms convention.

"This is a profile in boomeranging," Jason Johnson, an associate professor of communication and journalism at Morgan State University, told MS NOW's Ari Melber on Wednesday. "The effort to censor the interview we have Kimmel here has actually enhanced it only because they chose to fight. By putting it on YouTube, that puts it out to the world and, oh my gosh, we are way over the normal audience. And the intrigue — I mean, I'll tell folks, they titled it the interview the FCC doesn't want you to see. Americans don't like being told what to watch or what to think, Jason, including by right-wing overlords, even in Texas."

Later in the interview Johnson described how former talk show host and comedian, Stephen Colbert, symbolically passed the torch to Kimmel during a recent appearance on the latter's show. Colbert was recently cancelled by CBS in a move that critics allege was a cave to pressure from the network's pro-Trump management.

"This actually makes me somewhat emotional," Johnson told Melber. "This is such a huge deal because throughout his career, Stephen Colbert has been very supportive, not just of free speech rights, not just of labor and everything else like that. And so for Marvel to say, 'We're going to give you a replica shield of Captain America,' was significant. He's always had it in the background of his shows. For him to give it to Jimmy Kimmel is basically like when Steve Rogers gave his shield to Sam Wilson at the end of the Avengers series ['Avengers: Endgame']. And I can also say this, Steve Rogers' catchphrase, Captain America's catchphrase, is always, 'I can do this all day.' He fought bullies. That's what he did. He was a small-town kid who got superpowers and he fought against bullies. That's basically what Colbert is saying: 'I'm gonna let you continue this fight that I can't fight anymore against the bullies that other people can't push up against.'"

Kimmel claims that Trump's FCC pressured him to not air his recent interview with Talarico, forcing him to instead upload it to YouTube. While there it received more than 11 million viewers (at the time of this writing), nearly quadruple the 3 million people who tuned in to Trump's midterm convention. The convention didn't even win its week in ratings, as the NFL's opening game between the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks (a rematch of the most recent Super Bowl) drew more than octuple the convention at 25 million.

Trump's convention also suffered from low attendance, with the president urging attendees to not go to the bathroom lest it leave large empty patches that could be picked up by the cameras.

- YouTube youtu.be


'Like a desperate boyfriend': CNN's Jake Tapper has bad news for the GOP

CNN anchor Jake Tapper reports Republican policies have raised health care subsidies for Obamacare and escalated the trade war. Add to that the Iran war driving fertilizer prices and diesel prices to historic levels, and you can see why Republican Senate hopeful Ashley Hinson of Iowa is proposing to “reach across the aisle” to Democrats if elected.

“I'm Ashley Hinson, and I approve this message because working across the aisle isn't always easy, but it's how you get results,” said Hinson in her new ad.

But Tapper said Vice President JD Vance has a different kind of message as the U.SA. economy drags down the GOP with 48 days to go until the midterms.

“Don't give power to the people who caused the problems that we're fixing,” Vance told a recent audience. “Give us another chance or give us another couple of years to continue to work on the amazing things that we've been doing for the past two years.”

“Well, there's a bumper sticker for you: Give us another chance,” said Tapper Wednesday night, turning to Republican strategists Shermichael Singleton and Kristen Soltis Anderson. “… It sounds like a desperate boyfriend, frankly.”

“If I'm advising the president and you're going out on the campaign trail, you cannot deny the very real pain points for the American people,” said Singleton.

But strategist and pollster Anderson said Republicans’ biggest problem will not be reaching centrist voters that swing one way or another. It’s getting committed Republicans to polls at this point.

“For many Republicans, their big problem is going to be reminding their own voters, Republican voters, what is it that you sent us to Washington to do? Because if those voters are looking at DC and they're going, ‘oh, you renamed the Lake of America, uh, you renamed the Kennedy center.’ Like, that is not what voters are looking for. They're looking for things that they can feel. And even if you can't turn the titanic around in a couple of weeks and make people think the economy is wonderful, you have to at least be able to say, ‘here are the things concretely that we have done to try to make it better. Keep us here. We'll keep trying to do more.’”

Tapper then turned to Singleton and asked “what do you think Republicans are doing right?”

“You’re going to put me on the spot like that?” Singleton said jokingly.

“Hey, you said there are Republicans out there [doing it right.]” Tapper countered.

At that Singleton pointed to GOP senatorial candidate Mike Rogers in Michigan, for endorsing Trump yet straddling the line by being ‘hyper focused on statewide issues.”

“I think he and his campaign recognizes what propelled Trump and Republicans to victory in 2024 was nontraditional voters, low propensity voters,” he said, but Singelton added that getting these same voters to the polls this year “is an uphill battle.”

Anderson advised Republicans to deftly prove they’re ‘not a clone of Donald Trump,’ but she warned that daring to be a Republican who opposes Trump or his agenda “is perilous, depending upon the geography of where you sit.”

- YouTube youtu.be

Mitch McConnell appears to need 'prompting' to remember how to vote

On Wednesday, while delivering one of his first votes since returning from his prolonged medical absence, Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) appeared to have difficulty. According to a video recording of the vote, he seemed unsure what to do when his name was called.

“McConnell voting in the Farm Bill markup,” posted congressional journalist Jamie Dupree. “He votes 'aye' after a little prompting from fellow Senators and aides.” Indeed, when the Senator’s name is called, he raises a finger and hesitates for a moment, until his aides and other senators in his vicinity coach him into a yes.

There has been much concern raised about whether or not 84-year-old McConnell, who had numerous health incidents even before his mysterious three-month absence from the Senate, is fit for office. He's had a number of falls resulting in concussion and broken bones, and experienced several freezing episodes during which he seemed unable to speak or move. With all this in mind, some have suggested that the GOP may force him to participate in key votes despite his failing health and incapacity.

“It looks like they're just going to wheel him out in emergency situations when they absolutely need his vote,” said longtime conservative political commentator Charlie Sykes on Tuesday. “The compassionate response to seeing Mitch McConnell is, oh, no, let him retire. This is almost elder abuse. Let's not humiliate him. Let's not put him in these positions. Is he going to end up dying on the floor of the Senate?” Sykes – who broke with the GOP over its embrace of President Donald Trump – said that Republicans should do the “compassionate thing” and leave McConnell to tend to his health. “Why would you even put him through all of this?” asked Sykes. “The more outrageous thing is, don't the people of Kentucky actually deserve, number one, someone who will represent them, and number two, don't the voters deserve a little bit more transparency?”

Footage of a visibly infirm McConnell’s return to the Senate prompted one widely-cited psychologist to raise the red flag about symptoms of potential “neurological” issues. “We're seeing very, very low responsiveness,” said Dr. John Garrison. “His capacity to understand what's going on around him appears very, very limited.” Garrison made these assertions even before footage of McConnell’s struggling vote emerged, saying, “It seems like he's probably able to follow instructions to some degree. Whether or not he's got the capacity to actually vote or understand what he's voting for, it's a whole other subject.” He added, “There are so many different neurological conditions that can cause these types of problems. But the real question is, does he have the capacity to even understand what he's doing in the Senate? Clearly he's alive, but beyond that, is he able to interact in a meaningful way with legislation or what he's supposed to do?”

Kavanaugh left a clever trap that changes everything

I am not here to rain on your parade, pop all your balloons, or scrape the frosting off of your celebratory cake today, but I am here to tell you that the Supreme Court’s decision Monday night to block Donald Trump from getting his fat, little hands on our mail-in ballots was the absolute very least they could do in the face of his latest attack on America.

The fact is, Trump accomplished nearly everything he set out to during his ongoing authoritarian power-grab by sowing yet more doubt in our election process.

Be honest, despite Monday night’s ruling, who is going to feel 100-percent confident about voting by mail right now?

Once again, Trump set out to break something that was never broken, and is telling us only he can fix it. The examples of this are endless during his reign of terror, but has anybody seen his terrific, tremendous healthcare plan he promised us 10 years ago …?

I was actually relieved this morning when The New York Times tied this accompanying piece to their coverage of the Supreme Court’s decision:

“With Trump’s Plans Blocked, States Work to Restore Trust in Voting by Mail”

I can’t help you with the paywall if you aren’t a subscriber, but the story accurately depicts the trouble we are still in, despite that ruling.

(And hey, wouldn't it have been great if the NYT tackled this relentless Republican attack on our country as the national emergency it most certainly is, instead of dutifully showing up after whatever institution Trump has threatened to burn to the ground is already in flames? Sorry, but I am a dog, and the mainstream media is the bone I will never stop shaking for their absurd and inadequate coverage of the greatest threat to America since the Civil War. )

From the Times:

With the legal question now settled, election officials at the state and local levels will now shift their focus to communicating to voters that they can trust that they can securely continue to vote by mail without federal restrictions.
“We’ve actually been working all weekend to figure out the different scenarios for the outcomes of the decision,” said Francisco Aguilar, a Democrat who is Nevada’s secretary of state. “And one of them was, Hey, if we are in a position where we get a favorable ruling from the courts, what are we going to do to educate voters and to build that confidence that their ballot is going to get counted?”

“What are we going to do to educate voters and to build that confidence that their ballot is going to get counted?”

There it is.

Trump’s multi-pronged attack on America has been so effective that many Democratic officials and activists are telling people not to vote by mail, and to do everything possible to show up in person at the polls, or if you are lucky enough, to use a drop box to place your vote.

Of course, the challenge there is that Republicans have also been doing everything they can to make it as hard as possible to vote at these locations by restricting them, removing them, and threatening the people who work in these places.

Even I am inclined to suggest you get to a polling place to cast your ballot if you can, unless of course your only option is to vote by mail. By the way, voting by mail has already begun in here in North Carolina and my old state of Wisconsin, which are two crucial battleground states.

And if you are asking the obvious question as to why Trump and his Republicans are going so hard after mail-in voting, it’s simply because Democrats (37%) use this method more than Republicans (24%). I mean, aside from the fact that the convicted felon, Trump, would be only too happy if nobody ever voted again anywhere.

I am also going to pop yet another balloon by pointing out that the Supreme Court made sure to keep Trump’s fever dream of eliminating mail-in voting in play, when the perjuring Conservative justice, Brett Kavanaugh, laid in this clever concurring opinion to the 7-2 decision, writing:

"… applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections."

That sounds a lot like the Radical Right court loudly hinting it will go along with Trump’s attack on mail-in voting in 2028 because it will have allowed him sufficient time to take a nuclear-powered blowtorch to our vote by then.

Despite this, America’s 80-year-old baby was shaking his rattle and lambasting the court this afternoon, leaving this steaming pile of you-know-what on his social media feeds:

“(This is) a Court that is costing the United States Trillions of Dollars with shockingly bad rulings that are of such magnitude that it won’t be easily possible for our Country to recover or heal. It is a Court that will go down as having rendered some of the most destructive, hurtful, and damaging decisions in our Country’s history.”

For once, Baby Blowhard had something right, because this is the court that has denied women control of their bodies; has allowed unlimited dark money into our elections; and granted total immunity to him, so that he can do or say pretty much anything he wants.

I have talked to a few Democrats today, and despite Monday night’s ruling, every one of them is predicting two things about this looming election:

  1. Democrats are going to do well ( I believe they are going to do historically well).
  2. Trump and his Republican Orcs are going to do everything they possibly can to throw out the results and/or prevent Democrats from being seated in office.

This is exactly how corrupt third-world countries operate. We have become one of the very countries we used to warn people about.

I don’t have to remind you that there are still troops in our capital, and they are there for one reason: to act in the event Trump declares martial law following the elections.

That is how I see it going right now. You might have other guesses for what will go down, but we can all agree that it is extremely sad, and absolutely GALLING.

Because HOW DARE THEY.

There are not enough adjectives to describe my absolute contempt for the people in America, who knowing all this, will still vote for people who will go along with another attack on our country.

Yes, the Supreme Court did the very least it could to minimize the attack, but it is up to the people of this country who truly respect the rule of law and our democracy to vote in numbers so big Nov. 3, even Trump’s bought-off court won’t dare touch them, and he is seen as nothing but a whining baby who needs a diaper change, and a long, long nap.

Lord knows, the people who truly care about our country are plenty exhausted.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and was an award-winning journalist at ancient places called “newspapers.” You can find all his work here.

'Could not be true': General busts Trump official’s 'strange' Iran story

On Tuesday, a decorated Army general declared that the story of a shot-down pilot’s rescue during the war with Iran “could not be true.” The general’s statement came in response to an installment from the latest episode of 60 Minutes, decried by some analysts as "propaganda," which featured Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and a rescued airman relating a tale that retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey found literally unbelievable.

The 60 Minutes segment focused on an American F-15 pilot who crashed in Iran shortly after President Donald Trump launched the war nearly seven months ago. After the episode aired, McCaffrey — recipient of three Purple Hearts — took to social media to express his thoughts, posting, “Very strange story. Could not be true. US Army stops parachute ops with wind speed of 15mph. I’ve jumped with higher wind speeds, and it feels like a train wreck. 100 mph sounds like all bones in body broken and limbs torn off.” This came in response to a post that ran down the details of the 60 Minutes piece, explaining, “So the story is that a guy with codename dude bravo survived a free fall to the ground in Iran after his F-15 was shot hitting the ground at speeds of close to 100 mph. He then ran 20 miles and found a cliff that was 7000 feet high and climbed that cliff and was extracted in a two day period.”

As the Daily Beast elaborates, “In the segment, the airman, identified during the broadcast by the call sign ‘Bravo’ to protect his identity, said his parachute was damaged after the plane was badly hit. He said that during the freefall he did everything he could to ‘unfurl or pull pieces of the parachute loose,’ but to no avail. ‘It was the most terrifying thing I’ve ever seen,’ he said. He also said that during the fall, he broke several bones — including in his back, one arm, and shoulder — sprained his ankle, and suffered bloody scrapes on his body. After ejecting from the F-15, he said he managed to avoid being caught by Iranian forces as he hiked up 7,000 feet, while hardly equipped with anything. He was rescued 50 hours after the crash. The aircraft’s pilot was rescued shortly after the crash.”

The Beast also notes that “while ‘Bravo’ agreed to be interviewed on camera, his counterpart ‘Alpha’ did not — much to the dismay of Hegseth, who had been pushing for both of them to be interviewed on camera. Hegseth was also interviewed in the segment, along with several political appointees. CNN reported that the DOD was adamant that the airmen speak on the show, despite the airmen’s concerns about inadvertently revealing classified information about the rescue effort.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.