Search results for "steve bannon"

Trump-appointed judge slams the brakes on DOJ’s bid to free Steve Bannon

President Donald Trump's close informal adviser Steve Bannon is no stranger to controversy. From being roped into the president's political problems to being accused of cryptocurrency chicanery, Bannon is frequently in the headlines and often faces court battles. Yet Trump's Justice Department has done its best to pull him out of any fires he finds himself in.

Now one judge is making that feat a lot harder for the MAGA DOJ.

"JUST IN: Surprise order from Judge Carl Nichols (Trump/DC) putting up some resistance to DOJ motion to wipe out Bannon's jury convictions for contempt of Congress," Politico's Josh Gerstein reported on X on Wednesday.

In his ruling, Nichols made it clear that the Trump Justice Department had failed to provide any concrete reason why Bannon should not be investigated for contempt of Congress.

"The Government's motion does not explain its motivations for seeking dismissal of the indictment and thus fails to meet Rule 48(a)'s procedural requirement," Nichols wrote. "The sole explanatory sentence in the motion reads: 'The government has determined in its prosecutorial discretion that dismissal of this criminal case is in the interests of justice.' ECF 207 at 1. But that is the kind of 'conclusory statement by the prosecutor' that the Court of Appeals has said is insufficient to justify a Rule 48(a) motion. Ammidown, 497 F.2d at 620; see also Adams, 777 F. Supp. 3d at 208 ('[A] district court abuses its discretion if it does not articulate its reasons for granting or denying leave, and it cannot discharge its duties properly unless the underlying motion accurately states the government's reasons for dismissal.')."

He added, "The Court will therefore deny the Government's motion without prejudice. The Government is free to submit a renewed motion that complies with Rule 48(a)'s requirements."

Perhaps one reason Trump is so invested in Bannon is that the far right talk show host is active in pushing for Trump to seek a third term. Even though the Constitution's 22nd Amendment strictly bars Trump from serving another term, both Trump and Bannon have said they want it to happen.

"With just 78 days to go before America's midterm elections," journalist Simon Marks wrote in the UK-based i Paper, "Steve Bannon — Donald Trump's on-again, off-again political adviser — is suddenly a deeply worried man. On Friday, (August 14), the president's political Svengali told viewers of his daily 'War Room' broadcast that he has looked at the state of play in the midterm election campaign and fears Republicans are destined to come up short. Citing figures showing that Democratic candidates are ahead — in some cases, comfortably ahead — in several key states, Bannon insisted the party is on the brink of what he termed 'a disaster… completely, an absolute debacle.'"

Marks added, "But Bannon insisted there is still a way of saving the Trump project. He urged Republicans in Congress to immediately double down on their support of the president, warning the party's leaders that they are now complicit in a looming electoral disaster."

"Bannon is one of several Republican strategists who believe the answer to the party's woes is more Trump, not a retreat from him," Marks concluded. "A self-confessed 'huge advocate of President Trump's third term,' Bannon also continues to maintain that a way will be found to circumvent the Constitution and keep Trump at the helm for another four years…. In recent weeks, Trump has referenced the possibility of seeking a third term. He also sidestepped a reporter's question about whether he would rule out the prospect of trying to secure one, despite it being against the U.S. Constitution…. For now, Democrats are watching with glee."

Steve Bannon rips Trump official for spouting statistics 'nobody believes'

Prominent MAGA pundit Steve Bannon ripped into a Trump official he previously championed, per The Hill, chastising him for touting statistics that "nobody believes" and demanding he go further.

Bannon previously served as an influential top aide during President Donald Trump's first campaign and the early months of his first term, and remains a major voice in the MAGA movement by way of his "War Room" podcast. One of the second-term appointees that Bannon championed was FBI Director Kash Patel, who also emerged from the world of far-right podcasts.

Now, however, Bannon appears to be growing displeased with Patel's performance in the job, taking him to task for touting statistics about crime levels during a recent "War Room" episode.

"Kash, I love you brother, but I don’t want to hear any more statistics about how crime’s coming down, crime’s coming down, all that," Bannon said, adding that "nobody believes" what he is claiming.

"Nobody believes the crime statistics anyway, I’m sorry," he continued. "They still don’t feel comfortable walking down a street in Memphis [or] these other places, unless they see the National Guard... I don’t want to hear any crime statistics, I just don’t. It’s not going to move the needle, it’s not going to matter in any voting. Let’s have some urgency, let’s light a fire.”

Bannon further urged Patel to start getting "perp walks of the deep state" if he wants to make serious progress at the FBI. The Hill noted that this comment referred to the notion of an "unproven network of operatives within the federal government that supporters of Trump believe has sabotaged him for years."

The outlet also laid out a fuller picture of the crime statistics Bannon dismissed, which other experts have touted as signs of a remarkable nationwide downturn in violent crime, a trend that long preceded Trump's entry into the White House.

"Violent crime in the U.S. was down 9.1 percent in the U.S. from March 2025 to February of this year, according to the FBI," the outlet explained. "That includes robberies dropping by 19.1 percent, murders declining by 18.7 percent, rapes decreasing by 7.2 percent and aggravated assaults dropping by 6.9 percent. Property crime, meanwhile, dropped by 12 percent during the aforementioned time period, the FBI reported. Motor vehicle thefts decreased by 21.6 percent, while burglaries and larcenies dropped by 15.7 percent and 9.5 percent, respectively. Those declines followed a decrease in violent crime by 9.3 percent and in property crimes by 12.4 percent from 2024 to 2025, according to the FBI."

'You’re seeing it burn to the ground': Steve Bannon has a major warning for GOP insiders

Although Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont) is now 84, he continues to have a major influence on Millennial and Generation Z candidates. And one of them — 29-year-old Melat Kiros, backed by Sanders — ousted 15-term U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette in a Democratic congressional primary in Colorado on Tuesday. Kiros isn't the only self-described "democratic socialist" to win in recent weeks, and as MAGA Republican Steve Bannon sees it, the victory of Kiros and others is a major warning sign for the GOP.

During an interview with Politico, Bannon — host of the "War Room" vodcast and former White House chief strategist in the first Trump administration — argued that the lesson from the recent wave of "democratic socialist" victories is that Republicans need to lean more heavily on right-wing MAGA populism, not move away from it.

Bannon told Politico, "We are facing a new politics. We're seeing the dying of the old politics before us. You're seeing it burn to the ground before you."

Too many traditional conservatives, Bannon stressed, are clinging to the Republican Party's "old politics" even though GOP voters have moved on.

After democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York City, Bannon argued that his victory underscored the populist angst many voters are feeling — and that angst, he said, was also evident in Kiros' upset on Tuesday.

"The establishment has finally awakened to, it's not New York City, it's not inner-city Manhattan, it's not just the immigrants or the illegal aliens in the boroughs — this is going to be nationwide," Bannon told Politico. "Yes, clearly, it's Denver. It's one of the more liberal cities, but it's still the American West. It's still Colorado. When I went and talked to donors about what was coming, they laughed in my face. They said, 'You don't understand Democratic politics, you don't understand that (former New York Gov. Andrew) Cuomo has $40 million, that Cuomo has the New York Post and the New York Times endorsements. He's got all the big Jewish organizations, he's got the Catholic Church, he's got the firemen, he's got the cops, he's got every endorsement.' And I said, 'I don't care about that. What Mamdani has is, today, 1000 people canvassing, going door-to-door in the boroughs — in Queens, in the Bronx and in Brooklyn, that's what's going to determine this.' And they just laughed and said, 'We have $40 million, and Fox loves us.' And Cuomo got smoked."

The "consultant class of the Republican Party," Bannon argued, is being "caught off guard" by democratic socialists who are showing that they have a strong ground game.

"To beat Mamdani," Bannon told Politico, "you have to have intense, ongoing and massive voter engagement. You also have to get out your core base even more. The only thing that's going to save the Republicans is a massive turnout of the lower propensity, lower information Trump voters — already Trump voters — at presidential election-type numbers in these congressional districts to save the House, otherwise you're going to get overwhelmed…. You have to come up with solutions. The Republicans don't know how to respond…. We are facing a new politics. We're seeing the dying of the old politics before us. You're seeing it burn to the ground before you."

Bannon continued, "Artificial intelligence, the oligarchs and the threat of these kinds of Marxist jihadists — it's going to redefine politics, and he who is prepared to take it on, you're going to see the rise of these people. If you are playing the old politics of tax cuts and wars everywhere and doing the bidding of Israel, let me be blunt — you're finished. I just keep telling people, it's a flashing red light, and the (Senate Majority Leader) John Thunes of the world and (House Speaker Mike) Johnson better understand that the old politics are gone."

'MAGA is next': Fox News firing has Trump allies paranoid

Since longtime Fox News host and President Donald Trump loyalist Maria Bartiromo was fired last week, those in the MAGA realm have been warning one another that the famously conservative network is out to “cancel” them. These claims have sprung up across conservative media, and were renewed on Wednesday when former vice presidential candidate and proto-Trump politician Sarah Palin took to social media to declare she’d be fired from Fox for “disobeying,” and that the same fate would come to similar “independent characters.”

Palin posted on X that she was “cancelled” by Fox twice. The first, she claimed, came when she was fired from the network “after refusing to sit quiet during NYT’s false and defaming allegations against me that I was to blame for the mass murder in AZ causing the deaths of a federal judge, an innocent child and others, and injury of Rep. Gabby Giffords (D). Fox wouldn’t defend me so I defended myself after being told by Roger Ailes I was not to talk about it on the air. Fox was capitalizing on the controversy while my reputation was getting ripped to threads [SIC], so I spoke up, as any responsible, ethical, innocent American would. They canned me for ‘disobeying,’ as per word from on high.”

Giffords and 18 others were shot during a 2011 assassination attempt. Six were killed, and Giffords – having been shot in the head – was forced to resign to focus on her recovery. The attack came shortly after Palin’s PAC ran ads showing Giffords’ district targeted by crosshairs. At the time, then-Fox owner Rupert Murdoch received calls for Palin’s firing, and the network declined to renew her contract in 2015.

According to Palin, she went on to anger the powers that be at Fox again. “Later,” she claimed, “no longer an employee, they cancelled my scheduled [Jesse Watters] interview after I shared my opinion with [Fox host Eric Bolling] that [Rupert Murdoch] handing management reins to his sons resulted in the network straying from the Right, due to the sons’ liberal-leaning wives’ influence. I was never allowed on-air again. (I stand by my stated observation that - good, bad or ugly - Fox changed when Rupert’s influence subsided.)” She went on to say that this “behind-the-scenes” experience taught her the network has a “prerogative to shift wherever they want to go, and more power to them exercising their absolute right to hire and fire whomever they deem best fits their agenda, but interesting that independent characters refusing to go along just to get along (all to collect a paycheck) seem to be the ones shunned. I went rogue by speaking up for truth. I’ll continue to do so.”

Palin posted this screed in response to a clip from Trump ally Steve Bannon’s podcast, in which senior Trump advisor Peter Navarro claimed, “What’s left at Fox is a lineup of chickens. No one was willing to stick their neck out the way Maria Bartiromo did. You will not see a solidarity walkout at Fox for Maria. It damn well should happen, but it won’t.” Navarro argued that Fox CEO Suzanne Scott had “muzzled” Bartiromo, and as Bannon’s podcasts declared, “MAGA is next.”

Does Steve Bannon have a mirror?

There may be nobody -- perhaps not even Donald Trump himself -- who embodies the degeneracy of what used to be called conservatism like Stephen K. Bannon. That the "War Room" host still exerts influence over the American and international right as a media personality, political strategist and power broker indicates just how empty of moral character that movement truly is.

Like dear leader Trump, Bannon owes his prominence and prosperity to a pervasive atmosphere of impunity. Every day, in an era of burgeoning scandal on every front, both of them test its limits -- and have yet to find any at all.

What the Epstein files have lately revealed about Bannon, however, as disclosed in hundreds of emails between him and the predatory financier, is so depraved as to be almost unbelievable. In the face of these damning documents, the former Trump campaign manager has offered mutterings and excuses that scarcely even amount to a denial.

Not only did Bannon begin to execute a costly "op" with Jeffrey Epstein to rehabilitate the latter's image -- which ended only with his arrest by federal authorities in 2019 -- but they conspired politically together on various subsidiary plans both in the U.S. and Europe. Desperate for Bannon's help, Epstein financed his travel and connected him with potentates and politicians around the world. He paid Bannon hundreds of thousands of dollars to tape a dozen or more hours of "documentary" interviews that were evidently meant as media training, in anticipation of Epstein's prosecution.

All absolutely damning when assessed in the context of Epstein's vile assaults on girls and women, as well as his apparent financial crimes. Yet what seems most appalling so far, and most illustrative of the enveloping corruption, was their joint plotting against Pope Francis, whose liberal gestures toward gays and lesbians, migrants, Muslims and the global poor had enraged the self-styled "traditionalists" of the Catholic Church.

Together Bannon and Epstein aimed to produce a documentary film exposing the culture of hypocrisy and concealment surrounding homosexuality in the church, based on a 2019 French book "In the Closet of the Vatican." Bannon met with the book's author several times in Paris, where he also met Epstein, who had an apartment there.

With Epstein as the executive producer, Bannon predicted that the movie would wreak cataclysmic damage on the papacy and his other political adversaries, from Beijing and Brussels to Chappaqua. "Will take down Francis. The Clintons, Xi, Francis, EU -- come on brother," he wrote, encouraging Epstein (who would soon be dead).

Stop and ponder for a moment what Bannon was attempting to engineer. He wanted to produce a movie, with the help of a monstrous pedophile who had victimized hundreds of children, which would destroy the reputation of the Holy Father and perhaps many others equally without blame. And aside from the political benefit to his hard-right allies, Bannon no doubt hoped to bank a substantial profit.

It isn't easy to imagine a more sinister project. By comparison, Bannon's swindling of the suckers who financed his "We Build the Wall" nonprofit and his phony indictment of the humanitarian Clinton Foundation look quaint.

Now a few of Bannon's longtime enemies in the MAGA movement -- including Elon Musk and Roger Stone, rather dismal characters in their own right -- have leaped to attack him over these reports. Presumably Musk would like to distract attention from his own cameo role in the files, including his solicitation of an invite to "the wildest party" on Epstein's Caribbean island. And the scorpion-like Stone is merely stepping on a perceived rival, as he always does.

Yet there are many self-proclaimed Catholics and Christians in Trump's orbit, MAGA influencers and conservative pundits who should have something to say about these appalling revelations. Why have we not heard from JD Vance, vice president of the United States, a fairly recent Catholic convert and a MAGA nationalist like Bannon, who spends so much of his time blathering on social media? Why haven't we heard from Peter Thiel, the ultra-right gay billionaire and Epstein buddy who lectures about the "Antichrist" among "woke Democrats"?

Indeed, very few of our moral arbiters on the right have felt moved to speak up about Bannon -- just as they remained silent when his coconspirators in the "wall" scam served prison terms, while he skated with a presidential pardon.

The most apt summation of this MAGA mountebank appears in a video recently released among the Epstein files, which was shot for that aborted documentary.

Bannon asks Epstein, "Do you think you're the devil himself?"

"No," Epstein retorts. "But I do have a good mirror."

Trump tries to 'rewrite the past' with 'unprecedented' gift to Steve Bannon

Political scientist Austin Sarat on Wednesday warned that Donald Trump's Justice Department is making a "virtually unprecedented" demand on behalf of MAGA activist Steve Bannon that would effectively "rewrite the past" and further encourage supporters to break the law on his behalf.

Writing in a piece for The Hill this week, Sarat, a professor of political science at Amherst College, highlighted an extremely unorthodox legal request submitted by the DOJ last month, asking a federal judge to dismiss the contempt of Congress indictment leveled against Bannon over four years ago. This would, in turn, essentially vacate his conviction on that same charge.

Bannon, a former adviser to Trump and outspoken proponent of the MAGA agenda, was initially indicted by Congress in late 2021 for refusing to answer a subpoena from the House select committee investigating the January 6 attack on the Capitol. By the summer of 2022, he was convicted and sentenced to serve four months in prison and pay a $6,500 fine. Despite years' worth of appeal efforts, all the way up to the Supreme Court, Bannon ultimately ended up serving his time from July to October 2024 at a federal prison in Connecticut.

While the DOJ's new request on Bannon's behalf might fly under the radar for many as another in a long line of efforts by Trump to reward his loyalists, Sarat argued that this effort to dismiss a conviction after the prison sentence has been completed is "unprecedented" and would represent a new escalation in Trump's efforts to incentivize loyalty towards him at all costs.

"To dismiss an indictment after a prison sentence has already been served is virtually unprecedented and shows the lengths to which the administration will go to whitewash history and rewrite the past," Sarat wrote. "The judge, Trump appointee Carl Nichols, would be well advised to refuse."

It is not unheard of for prosecutors to ask that indictments or convictions be overturned, though Sarat said it is "extraordinarily rare" for it to happen after a sentence has been completed. Typically, such requests are only made after new evidence of the convict's innocence has been discovered or if there is a clear argument that their constitutional rights were violated.

"Again, none of that applies to Bannon," Sarat wrote.

Trump previously decried Bannon's indictment and conviction, claiming that the attempt to compel his testimony before Congress was a violation of his legally dubious assertions about "executive privilege." In the request from February, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche called the original subpoena "improper" and claimed that the DOJ is attempting to "undo the prior administration’s weaponization of the justice system."

"Bannon had his day in court. He was tried and convicted. He appealed all the way to the Supreme Court and lost before going to prison," Sarat wrote. "The only thing that has changed is that his friends have returned to power. What the Justice Department is doing in the Bannon case is just the latest example of why, as former Secretary of Labor Robert ReichRobert Reich puts it, 'Trump justice is an oxymoron.'"

Key Trump campaign ally slams Steve Bannon as 'Epstein lackey'

Many well-known conservatives, from Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-South Dakota) to veteran Washington Post columnist George Will to former Deputy White House Press Secretary Sarah Matthews, are saying that if far-right Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton becomes the GOP nominee in that state's 2026 U.S. Senate race, the seat could be in play for Democrats. And that's saying a lot, as Texas hasn't had a Democratic U.S. senator since 1993.

President Donald Trump, so far, hasn't endorsed either Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), the incumbent, or his ultra-MAGA challenger Paxton in that primary. But some of Trump's allies are having a bitter argument over it.

Chris LaCivita and pollster Tony Fabrizio, two major GOP operatives and Trump allies, are supporting Cornyn. But "War Room" host Steve Bannon, Politico Playbook reports, is "going all-in for Ken Paxton and slamming Trump's top campaign aides for backing John Cornyn."

LaCivita is calling Bannon out. In a text to Politico Playbook, LaCivita wrote, "associating with Senator Cornyn is better than being a lacky (sic) for Epstein."

That comment, Playbook's Adam Wren notes, was an "apparent reference to Bannon’s newly surfaced ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein."

Bannon told Playbook, "My belief is the Trump team should have stayed out of this race, absolutely. ... The Paxton situation is critical, because he has been the MAGA guy since Day One. He is a symbol of the heart of the grassroots MAGA movement."

Steve Bannon’s new scandal 'worse than ever imagined'

President Donald Trump’s top adviser Steve Bannon is ensnared in a cryptocurrency scandal — although in Bannon’s case, the controversy comes with a literally profane twist.

A Missouri investor named Andrew Barr is suing Bannon over a failed cryptocoin called “F—— Joe Biden” (FJB), according to The Bulwark. Barr alleges that he lost almost $59,000 investing in the FJB coin and is seeking to sue Bannon in a class action suit that would also include MAGA bigwigs like political operative Boris Epshteyn. Barr also claims that Bannon and the other FJB executives demanded an unusually high 8 percent fee on transactions on the grounds that 5 percent would go to charitable donations like veterans’ care, but has not lived up to that promise.

The FJB coin, which was supposedly going to one day power an “uncancelable” economy under Trump, plummeted in value under Bannon’s and Epshteyn’s management. The lawsuit also alleges that $2.7 million in value intended to go to charity or marketing has instead vanished unaccounted for. Despite enlisting top MAGA figures like Benny Johnson and Jack Posobiec to promote the coin, the FJB coin never became a lucrative venture. Finally the lawsuit points to public discussions among FJB executives which suggest they were aware something was amiss with their financial product.

“Top coin administrator Sarah Abdul and programmer Chase Bailey offered their lament over an alleged $120,000 payment from FJB to Epshteyn’s friends for lackluster services,” The Bulwark reported regarding a Discord conversation among FJB executives. “But, they concluded, it was ‘drops in the bucket’ compared to more serious financial mismanagement, which they didn’t spell out. Abdul told Bailey the management of the coin’s money was ‘worse than I ever imagined,’ according to the lawsuit.”

The Bulwark quoted Bailey as replying, “This looks sooooo neglegent [sic].”

This is not the first time Trump and his administration’s figures have gotten involved in cryptocurrency scandals. The Abu Dhabi royal family invested $500 million in the Trump family’s cryptocurrency coin; later, after Trump became president, the United Arab Emirates received access to highly sensitive AI technology. The Wall Street Journal reported that the deal involved “pay half up front, steering $187 million to Trump family entities” and at the same time “at least $31 million was also slated to flow to entities affiliated with” the family of Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. Democratic strategist David Axelrod described this as “an earthquake of a scandal” while Protect Democracy director Ian Bassin commented “amazingly, this has all but fallen out of the news."

In addition to Trump himself, Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche was accused by the ethics watchdog Campaign Legal Center of owning at least $159,000 in cryptocurrency assets when he ordered an end to all investigations into cryptocurrency companies. Blanche had previously signed an ethics agreement promising to dump his cryptocurrency holdings within 90 days of being confirmed, but instead did not divest until more than a month after his cryptocurrency memo. Even then he did so transferring them to his adult children and a grandchild, which though legal skirts the spirit of the law.

Despite the Trump administration’s abundant promises that cryptocurrency would lead to immense profits, the market has fallen more than 50 percent since its October peak with no end in sight.

“I’ve never seen people so dispirited about the crypto industry before, even at the lowest lows," Nic Carter, founding partner of the crypto investment firm Castle Island Ventures, told Politico. "Psychologically, this feels really hard for people to handle.”

Carter later added, “The rapture didn’t happen, we’re just stuck here on Earth and it sucks.”

Steve Bannon warns MAGA has 'massive lack of enthusiasm' for Trump

Steve Bannon, the former Trump strategic adviser and prominent MAGA commentator, warned on Monday that the MAGA base is suffering from a "massive lack of enthusiasm" as Donald Trump's second term wears on.

According to a Monday report from The Hill, Bannon — who maintains considerable influence in the MAGA sphere — warned during a recent episode of his "War Room" podcast that Trump's loyal base is suffering from a notable lack of excitement and motivation. He cited several reasons, including the president's slow and controversial handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files release, as well as the shift away from his campaign promise to avoid foreign conflicts and his lack of success addressing affordability.

"You have a massive lack of enthusiasm among the base," Bannon said. "Because they’re sitting there going ‘I’m just not feelin’ it right now."

Bannon further cited a concerning report from Big Data Poll, which found that the voters were throwing their midterm support more toward Democrats than Republicans. On a generic ballot, around 46 percent of the poll's respondents said that they would more likely support a Democratic candidate for Congress, while only 42 percent said that they were more likely to support a Republican.

The Hill noted in its report that, despite this fading excitement and generic ballot support, the GOP maintains a fundraising lead over the Democrats for the time being, with the Republican National Committee ending 2025 with around $100 million in cash-on-hand than the Democratic National Committee.

Bannon recently generated widespread controversy over statements encouraging the Trump administration to deploy federal immigration officers to monitor polling places during November's midterm elections. While Bannon claimed this would be done to combat election fraud — of which there is little actual evidence — others accused him of encouraging Trump to engage in voter intimidation.

"You're damn right we're gonna have ICE surround the polls come November," Bannon said during an earlier episode of his podcast. "We're not gonna sit here and allow you to steal the country again. And you can whine and cry and throw your toys out of the pram all you want, but we will never again allow an election to be stolen…. Let's put you on notice again: ICE is going to be around the polls in the 2026 midterm elections."

Steve Bannon knows how to stop Trump

One of the rare experts on Donald Trump is far-right host Steve Bannon, and he knows exactly how to get the president to stop his reckless antics and return to navigating economic woes.

Speaking to The Atlantic's Ashley Parker, Bannon explained, “He’s driving deep. Remember, our strategy — I say it every day — is maximalist, a maximalist strategy. You have to take it however deep you can take it and, quite frankly, until you meet resistance. And we haven’t met any resistance.”

One year into Trump's second administration, “We haven’t met any resistance," Parker repeated.

"It is astonishing just how far Trump has pushed the country over the past year," without much response from lawmakers on the federal level, she said,

Parker listed off the growing number of actions Trump has taken that "in some cases, especially his base," would have been "outraged" over.

The growing list of actions that haven't inspired much response from the GOP-led Congress: "Already, many Americans have grown accustomed to bands of National Guard troops patrolling their cities; the United States bombing other countries without congressional approval (or even notification); white-nationalist rhetoric filling government social-media feeds; federal funding disappearing from elite universities that are viewed as too 'woke' and hostile to Trump’s movement; hundreds of thousands of immigrants being arrested and deported, often with extreme force; the once-independent Justice Department taking orders from the White House; conservative influencers masquerading as journalists; government data losing their reliability; museums quietly whitewashing history; and the White House being physically and symbolically demolished and rebuilt in Trump’s image."

Behind the scenes, leaders told Parker that they think Trump's election wasn't the standout, but that President Joe Biden's was. "Trump's reelection is not a fever dream but rather a reflection of the country at this moment."

State and world leaders, she pointed out, appear to be operating under the assumption that if they simply flatter Trump with attention and gifts, he might leave them alone. Those willing to stand up to Trump are quickly "labeled domestic terrorists, accused of left-wing 'street violence,' and threatened with 'the power of law enforcement.'"

As a "lame duck," Trump appears "impervious" to his sinking poll numbers, Parker wrote.

"It remains unclear just how far the president is willing to go, and what his endgame is," she cautioned.

While the first Trump term had the president backing off from unpopular policies when the public and lawmakers reacted collectively, this time, things are different.

"I have been struck by just how little meaningful resistance he’s faced, from citizens and even from lawmakers who claim to find his actions appalling or terrifying," said Parker.

She posited that Trump Derangement Syndrome has, instead, "been replaced by Trump Exhaustion Syndrome."

Bannon explained that the list of policies that Americans find objectionable is slowly shifting those ideas toward policy.

“You move it, and you do it, and no one complains — or MSNBC and The Atlantic complain and nobody gives a f— —and then you do it again, and push it again," said Bannon.

Parker closed by characterizing the U.S. as "settling" for Trump's behavior with "the illusory safety of the fetal crouch."

Read the full column here.

Steve Bannon’s gone silent on Epstein after once calling issue 'a ticking time bomb'

Editor’s Note: This headline has been updated.

Far-right firebrand Steve Bannon once said that “Epstein is a key that picks the lock on so many things." Now he has gone quiet.

CNN reported Friday that after being found extensively throughout the files, he's suddenly stopped talking about the topic.

"It’s similar to an approach Bannon once suggested for Epstein as allegations about the financier’s sex crimes resurfaced," the report observed. "In February 2019, Epstein said in a text message he would like 'true facts out.' Bannon replied, 'you should just want this to go away.'"

Epstein wanted to go public, but Bannon warned against it.

“Have you lost your f—— mind,” he wrote, “the moment you say ANYTHING this is global story [number 1].”

CNN noted that, in a statement to the New York Times, Bannon said he was simply "filming a documentary" about Epstein. Six years after Epstein's death, however, that "documentary" has never been released. The hours and hours of footage haven't been subpoenaed by Congress either.

It suggests that Bannon is adopting the strategy of staying quiet, lying low and hoping it all goes away. But the Epstein files aren't going away. After spending nearly a decade talking about a conspiracy trafficking ring of the rich and famous, the QAnon crowd isn't letting it go.

“Democrats know Epstein’s black book is a ticking time bomb. That’s why they’ve switched their focus to affordability,” Bannon once said in a July War Room episode.

Ironically, CNN noted, Bannon "has long trained his audience to distrust convenient explanations." One of his favorite phrases is “There are no conspiracies but there are no coincidences.”

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) has spoken out against male MAGA, which she said is not only downplaying the files but also outright mocking the survivors of trafficking and abuse. On Bannon, she maintains, “There is no excuse for having such a friendly relationship with Epstein, post conviction."

While President Donald Trump's ally, Laura Loomer, attacked Greene over her comments, Loomer told CNN that Bannon should be “100 percent forthcoming” about his Epstein ties. She also called it “a bit hypocritical” for Bannon to spend so much time pressing for the files to be released only for him to go silent once many of them were.

Another top Trump ally and former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, agreed, writing on X that he needs to explain some things. Flynn was specifically responding to a 2018 text message between Bannon and Epstein in which Bannon says that the 25th Amendment could be used to get Trump out of office. The comment became public as Trump's mental fitness continues to be questioned.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.