Lesley Abravanel

'Everyone in the West Wing' is 'furious' with this Trump Cabinet official: report

Transportation secretary and acting NASA administrator Sean Duffy is on thin ice with Trump and the White House after reigniting a feud with on-again, off-again Trump confidant Elon Musk, according to NOTUS.

According to the report, Duffy is desperate to hang onto his NASA role, folding it into the Department of Transportation, but Musk ally Jared Isaacman, whose initial nomination to head the space agency was withdrawn, has returned to seek the position.

Following Isaacman's initial nomination to lead NASA by Trump in December 2024, Trump withdrew the nomination in May 2025 over concerns about Isaacman's past political donations to Democrats.

As Isaacman has been said to be making "inroads" with Trump and others in his administration, Duffy was "beginning to feel the pressure that his plan to fold NASA under his purview as secretary of transportation was slipping," according to NOTUS sources.

Those sources also said Duffy appears to be putting his own interests ahead of the administration’s, and in doing so, "rubbed people the wrong way."

“There are people in the White House who believe Duffy has made unnecessary chaos rather than just accept that his time is in the sunset,” one administration official told NOTUS.

Duffy went on a media tour of sorts this week, touting the work NASA was doing and digging at Musk, saying, "SpaceX was behind in getting humans back on the moon, and NASA is 'not going to wait for one company.'"

Musk retaliated on his X app, calling Duffy “Sean Dummy” and saying he is “trying to kill NASA.”

While NASA defended Duffy, insiders at the White House say that fighting with Musk was a step too far.

“Everyone, and I mean everyone in the West Wing, is furious at him,” one source with knowledge of the dynamic told NOTUS.

How Trump ruined the 'Made in America' label: industry experts

The "Made in America" label used to have great appeal selling a brand of patriotism and quality, but President Donald Trump's tariffs, among other things, have caused that label to lose its luster, according to home furnishings industry experts at Home News Now.

"To stay competitive, domestic brands must emphasize quality, customization, convenience and storytelling," they write, saying, "there’s something about a star-spangled label that tugs at the patriotic heartstrings — or maybe it’s just easier to justify spending more on a dining table made here."

The data, however, "doesn't exactly match the rhetoric," they write.

In 2022, 60 percent of U.S. consumers said they were more likely to purchase a product they knew was American-made, they explain. However, that number has slipped to "around 50 percent."

That's an 18 percent drop in influence, according to a recent Conference Board study surveying 3,000 U.S. adults.

Driving this shift, they say, are "tariffs, price sensitivity, inflation and trade policies," which "are reshaping how consumers perceive 'made in' labels — even those signaling U.S. origin."

"Many Americans now associate 'made in USA' with higher costs because of domestic production expenses and tariffs on foreign goods. Put simply, patriotism is still nice, but value often wins the day," says Denise Dahlhoff, Ph.D., the author of the study.

Throughout his political career,Trump has championed a "Made in America" agenda while his family's branded products have been primarily manufactured overseas, often in China. This has created a recurring point of conflict and criticism regarding his policies versus his business practices.

The study also shows that older Americans are "losing enthusiasm for American-made goods," viewing them as pricier than their foreign counterparts.

Under 35 consumers, they say, aren't interested in the label "for reasons tied to sustainability and job creation."

Affluent buyers prefer the "Made in Italy" or "Made in France" labels, they say.

The bottom line is, "For residential furniture manufacturers, the takeaway is clear: 'made in America' alone is no longer enough."


Trump 'transparency' panned after Secret Service closes public park to stop East Wing photos

After the viral optics of a demolished East Wing at the White House led the Trump administration to warn staff at the Treasury Department not to post any more pictures of it, CNN's Jim Sciutto reported on X that the Secret Service closed access to the park where journalists had been snapping photos.

"Look away! New: US Secret Service has closed access to the Ellipse park where journalists had been capturing live images of the East Wing demolition. CNN had a photojournalist capturing live images of the demolition at the time. Reuters was also ushered out of the park," Scuitto posted along with a video showing the demo.

General consensus to the park closure was, in the words of one snarky commenter, "'The most transparent administration in U.S. history' sure does love to hide what they’re doing from the public."

Another agreed, adding, "Most transparent administration in history! [S]ome exclusions apply."

Kansas media professional Glenn Craven wrote, "Nothing says 'most transparent administration' like closing a public park so nobody can watch the demolition of the East Wing of 'The People’s House.'"

Author Greg Cantwell said, "I think they're beginning to realize this video is a startling accurate representation of what Trump is doing to our country: he's tearing it down."

MAGA pundit educated after wondering aloud how 'the right' devolved into 'vile' rhetoric

Indian-American right-wing political commentator, filmmaker and author Dinesh D'Souza has been a vocal supporter of President Donald Trump, who pardoned him in 2018 for a campaign finance felony. But now, he appears perplexed about the origins of anti-Indian rhetoric coming from the far-right.

D'Souza has consistently been a vocal supporter of Trump and has produced books and films promoting his political agenda. In late 2024, D'Souza walked back a central claim of his 2022 film 2000 Mules and issued an apology to a man he had accused of illegal ballot harvesting.

D’Souza, responded to a post on X, wrote, “America is also [our] home. W[e] live here, under laws that [we] made. Didn’t Biden and the Democrats ignore those laws, tear down the walls and let millions of home invaders in? Where were you when all that was happening?”

D'Souza received a reply from one user that was filled with anti-Indian racism.

"You’re Indian, you made nothing, you are nothing, and devoid of creation. Your ilk has been a race of slaves for hundreds of years, and even after being given a chance, you prove what worth you are, devoid of actual thought. Your existence causes me disgust," wrote the account.

D'Souza shared that reply with his own, saying, "In a career spanning 40 years, I have never encountered this type of rhetoric. The [r]ight never used to talk like this. So who on our side has legitimized this type of vile degradation? It’s a question worth thinking about."

Bloomberg columnist Matthew Ygleisias shared the post and added, "I never thought the leopards would eat my face."

D'Souza took to replying to many commenters on his own thread, including one who said, "Dinesh, You’ve quite displayed quite a bit of contempt for Indian people in the past. I wonder who sowed the seeds for this, not a difficult question to answer?"

D'Souza replied, "When have I done this? Can you give a specific example?"

Another replied, "I'm sure you will find a way to blame Tucker," referring to former Fox host Tucker Carlson, to which D'Souza replied, "Not at all, he has nothing to do with this." D'Souza added that he only blames Carlson for "his obsessive anti-Israel stance which hurts Trump and MAGA and helps radical Islam."

While not one commenter in D'Souza's thread pointed out that lack of irony, X account Columbia University adjunct professor Ted Perlmutter replied to Iglesisas, saying, "That is really rich coming from a man who was once a prominent Republican policy operative and has been descending into conspiracy theories and unfounded attacks for years. I think Dinesh should run for President on the I did not know the leopards would eat my face party."

Ex-Trump foe 'made a deal with the devil' to 'rip up the world order': expert

President Donald Trump's former "tormenter" turned Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, has become a "MAGA powerhouse," driving an "illegal war on Venezuela," writes Salon's Heather Digby Parton.

Digby Parton recalls Rubio's "most-cringe prime time performances" when he gave the rebuttal to President Barack Obama's 2013 State of the Union speech and awkwardly reached for a bottle of water, "cementing his reputation as the thirstiest man in the U.S. Senate."

What was viewed by many as the end of Rubio's career has long been forgotten, or at least ignored, and, Digby Parton writes, "it’s a testament to his limitless ambition that he came back from that and is now one of the most powerful people in the world."

The former Florida senator, she writes, "showed early on an aptitude for sensing which way the wind was blowing," and "over the years he held both moderate and conservative positions on most issues."

Rubio, she says, initially "rejected the scientific consensus on climate change and then, a few years later, decided it was true." He was also "once one of the Republican Party’s most vocal advocates for comprehensive immigration reform and even sponsored the DREAM Act," she writes.

"Now he energetically supports Donald Trump on the most draconian deportation program in American history," she writes, adding that "he broke with the GOP on more than one occasion when it came to budget battles, at times striking a pose as populist defender of the little guy, but overall he was a standard-issue right-wing conservative on taxes and spending."

Rubio's focus, she says, has always been national security and foreign policy as an "unreconstructed hawk," but has also taken a hard-line stance against human rights violations in China, Turkey and Venezeula.

Rubio also served as co-chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence with Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), with whom he led a three-year investigation that found clear evidence of Russian interference on Trump’s behalf in the 2016 election, exactly as Robert Mueller’s investigation had established, Digby Parton notes.

Rubio even once taunted Trump about his "small hands," something that Digby Parton says "for a man who carries around grudges like precious offspring, it’s odd that Trump has apparently decided to overlook all that, but Rubio worked hard to abase himself and get into the inner circle."

And while the political establishment and many Democrats were "relieved" when Trump chose Rubio as Secretary of State, thinking he would "keep Trump foreign policy from going off the rails," Digby Parton writes, "little did they know that Rubio had happily made a deal with the devil and now seems to relish the idea of ripping up the world order in Trump’s image."

"They certainly couldn’t have anticipated how eagerly Rubio would join in the deportation crusade by targeting foreign students for visa violations, as well as for unauthorized opinions about Israel and Charlie Kirk," she writes.

Among Rubio's other turns include his endorsement of the Trump administration's shutdown of medical and food programs of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), of which Rubio had always been supportive.

"It came a something of a shock," she writes, adding "he even agreed to betray informants under U.S. protection to Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele in exchange for an agreement to lock up purported Venezuelan gang members in El Salvador’s gruesome gulag."

When Russia first invaded Ukraine, Rubio condemned President Vladimir Putin's aggression, but then quickly "changed his tune," "voting against military aid early on and adopting the Trump line that a negotiated settlement was the only way out."

Rubio's stance on Venezuela, she says, comes from his background as a member of "the anti-Castro Cuban-American community of South Florida."

"Rubio has a strong strain of anti-left ideology which has made him especially obsessed with Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela’s socialist authoritarian president," Digby Parton says.

According to recent reports in the Wall Street Journal, "the extrajudicial killings, CIA covert actions and pending war plans against Venezuela are all being driven by Rubio," she writes. "Rubio and deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller have carried the day with a full-fledged plan to pressure and perhaps depose the Venezuelan leader."

Rubio's future ambitions, she says, is the driving force in all of his actions.

"Marco Rubio almost certainly intends to run for president in 2028 and sees his service in that cause as the best way to fulfill his own agenda and expand both his power and his political profile," she says, adding "He’s a fully paid-up MAGA fanatic now, and no one should think otherwise."

Backlash grows against Trump as his ratings on economy plummet to historic lows

With federal data expected to show rising inflation, President Donald Trump is facing backlash on his handling of the economy as the job market weakens and American exporters suffer from his trade agenda, according to The Hill.

Data set to be released Friday is expected to show annual inflation hitting 3 percent for the first time since President Joe Biden's administration — a full percentage point higher than the Federal Reserve’s target, The Hill says.

Economists are also projecting the consumer price index (CPI) report to show higher inflation in September "largely due to climbing energy and food prices — two of the hardest areas for Americans to cut costs," they explain.

Prices have risen steadily since the second half of the year due to Trump's tariffs, despite the president's denial. Businesses are also hiring far fewer workers than in recent years, pushing the unemployment rate higher, with millions of Americans suffering financially, The Hill says.

"The combination has brought Trump’s ratings on the economy down to historic lows, according to a new poll," they write.

U.S. job growth has slowed from an average of 150,000 per month at the start of 2025 to just 25,000 by August, according to analysis from Elsie Peng, research economist at Goldman Sachs.

According to a Quinnipiac University poll released Wednesday, only 38 percent of voters approve of Trump’s handling of the economy, "the lowest level he’s received since February 2017," The Hill notes.

Fifty-seven percent of voters said they disapprove of Trump’s handling of the economy.

“With a nearly 20-point gap between approval and disapproval on President Trump’s handling of the economy, it’s a low watermark for a president who promised a vibrant and muscular economy,” says Quinnipiac University polling analyst Tim Malloy.

The government shutdown, for which a majority of Americans blame Trump and the Republicans, has yet to fully impact these numbers, The Hill explains.

“The economic impact of the government shutdown and its disruption to data collection has not yet been fully felt,” writes Stephen Kates, financial analyst at Bankrate, in a Tuesday analysis.

“Federal layoffs or the absence of backpay would drag down spending and worsen labor conditions, especially in the local areas most affected,” he continues. “The longer the shutdown continues, the larger our blind spot will be.”

Trump’s 'immense cognitive decline' is 'grave risk' to all: psychologist​

A prestigious psychologist says that President Donald Trump is exhibiting a “massive increase” in “clinical signs of dementia,” exacerbating the president’s “malignant narcissism,” according to The Daily Beast.

Former Johns Hopkins professor and psychologist Dr. John Gartner says that the 79 year old president's "nonsensical speeches, repeated confusion, and frequent lapses in memory" are proof of his “immense cognitive decline.”

Gartner points to the president's speech to top military brass at Quantico as an example of hisdecline.

In that speech, Gartner, who co-hosts a popular podcast on Trump's decline called "Shrinking Trump," points out how “disordered” Trump's thinking is, noting his similarity to dementia patients who “pick up on one concrete physical detail” and then “free-associate” away from the original topic.

Trump’s speech at "one point veered abruptly from discussing Marine morale to Biden’s autopen,” before finally landing on a wandering tangent about “gorgeous paper," he notes.

Gartner says Trump's deterioration is propping up his “grandiosity” and “paranoia” and warned that, with the nuclear football in Trump’s possession, “it really would be impossible to overstate the grave risk that all of us are at right now.”

He also says that “because of his cognitive decline, [Trump] is focusing on things like the [White House] ballroom and the paper that he writes things on.”

“We’re seeing a stone skipping along the water. He’s going from one association to another, but it doesn’t make any linear sense,” Gartner says, adding that the president suffers from “phonemic paraphasia,” where words are left incomplete and finished with a nonsense ending.

Just last week, notes The Daily Beast, "Trump claimed that he had halted a 'nuclear' war between Iran and Pakistan, repeatedly mixing up Iran and India without noticing the mistake."

“It’s one thing to get a name wrong, maybe even to reverse it,” Gartner says. “But he’s actually confusing the countries themselves."

In response to Trump saying he solved an "imaginary conflict between Cambodia and Armenia — two nations 4,000 miles apart, just days after bragging he’d stopped a showdown between Azerbaijan and Albania, apparently meaning Armenia," Gartner says it's time to sound the alarm.

“People don’t make those kinds of phonemic paraphasias if they’re tired or if they’re aging,” he says. “It’s something very specific that is linked to dementia and organic, cognitive decline.”

When Trump forgot House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries’ (D-NY) name just a day after meeting with him last month to discuss averting a government shutdown, Gartner says that's "clearly demented memory loss."

When Trump was telling reporters about his talks with the Senate minority leader, he said, “Chuck Schumer, who was here yesterday, along with... uhh, the, a very nice gentleman who I didn’t really know. You know who I’m talking about.”

Gartner's take on this: "This is like when you go to visit your mother in the nursing home and you bring your sister and she goes, ‘Who’s that nice lady that you brought with you?’... I mean, it’s that level of non-recognition that we’re talking about."

Gartner also says Trump "displays 'malignant narcissism,' a rare and severe personality disorder marked by paranoia and sadism that has been used to describe dictators such as Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, and Saddam Hussein."

“The idea that he really just wants to s—— on everyone who disagrees with him, that’s literally how he feels because of the personality disorder,” Gartner says.

Gartner says Trump, the oldest sitting president in American history, is only going to get worse.

“This is really someone who could wake up and — in a state of complete confusion and erratic irritation — do something catastrophic,” he says.

Religious leaders mount 'moral counter' to Trump’s 'distortions of Christian values'

A coalition of Christians leaders are challenging President Donald Trump's approach to immigration, civil rights and poverty, saying his "distortions of Christian values sanctify exclusion and fear," according to Axios.

"Faith isn't owned by the Right," Rev. Eddie Anderson told Axios. "And God isn't a dirty word. God is the word."

Moderate faith leaders, Axios reports, are escorting immigrants to court hearings, blasting "rapid response" text alerts on sightings of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and leading vigils to try to prevent protest clashes.

These leaders are also calling their church members to stand up and speak out, too.

"We don't just pray for peace. We bring peace," Rev. Brendan Busse told Axios.

And while "conservative evangelical voters are a high-turnout, GOP-leaning bloc with clear spokespeople, tight message discipline and built-in media megaphones, from talk radio to megachurch stages," Axios says, moderate and progressive clergy have an opening.

"Moderate faith networks could give Democrats an opening to go after an estimated 15 million 'persuadable Christians,'" said Doug Pagitt, a pastor and executive director of the progressive Christian group Vote Common Good.

These religious leaders say they hope these "persuadable Christians" will join forces with them as they witness what the Trump administration is doing.

"People are bearing witness at prayer vigils and marches and processions. They're bearing witness in courthouses," PICO California executive director Joseph Tomás McKellar told Axios, adding that he hopes this new movement becomes "a political force rather than a partisan one."

The Trump administration has gone to great lengths to infuse a form of evangelical Christianity into the White House and the nation. In February 2025, Trump established a new White House Faith Office led by his longtime spiritual advisor, televangelist Paula White-Cain.

Cain has said that said that "Jesus would have been 'sinful' and not 'our Messiah' if he had broken immigration laws when fleeing persecution to Egypt as a baby with his family, as told in the Gospel of Matthew."

Moderate leaders like Dave Gibbons, lead pastor of multiethnic Newsong Church in Santa Ana, Calif., told Axios that those are distortions of Christian values that sanctify exclusion and fear.

"The Gospel's good news doesn't leave people out, especially the stranger," said Gibbons, adding that moderate and progressive Christians are countering MAGA's theology not with rallies, but with court side accompaniment, rapid responses and "the Beatitudes."

'Not the MAGA I fought for': Trump now hemorrhaging support from true believers

MAGA influencer Breck Warsham, whose X handle is "The Patriotic Blonde," has been commiserating with her nearly 100,000 followers about her anger over what she calls President Donald Trump's "180", saying the only one angrier than they are is probably Vice President JD Vance.

In a post written Wednesday afternoon, Warsham writes, "Unpopular opinion. I actually feel bad for JD Vance. I think he was pulled into this thinking he was on a winning team that would make him a guaranteed win in '28. I don't think for the life of him he anticipated this 180 by POTUS. If anyone is angrier at him than many of us are at this point, it has to be him."

Not everyone was as sympathetic for the Vice President.

One commenter asked, "Does it match the 180 Vance himself did? Vance is on record comparing trump to Hitler."

Another said, "I don't buy it. There's parts of Vance I like. He has that brash American swagger, and it's at times satisfying to watch him 'own the libs." But what has he actually done? He's over in Israel shaking hands with IDF, casually giving go ahead to bomb Yemen, gaslighting about Epstein, and pushing mass surveillance."

Earlier on Wednesday, Warsham posted a poll on X asking "Who do you side with? Vote and sound off in the comments as to why," featuring only two choices —Trump and Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), who Trump has targeted for pursuing the release of the files of late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

As of 1:30 p.m. EST, Massie was winning the poll 80.7 percent to Trump's 19.3 percent, with over 4,000 votes.

One commenter noted that "The vote at this moment shows that Massie has more than three times the vote of Trump. That’s why Trump hates Massie so much, because Massie takes the spotlight away from Trump. Trump had so much potential, then he turned his back on his voters and jumped in bed with Israel."

Worsham clearly blames Trump for his actions during the government shutdown, as well, saying "The government is in a complete shutdown, the elderly are not receiving their food stamps, the job market is the worst its been in decades, the housing market is in crisis, inflation is through the roof and what does Trump do? -Give $40 billion to Argentina -Buy Kristi Noem 2 private jets -Install a $250M Whitehouse ballroom - Demand $230M taxpayer dollars in restitution.'That seems legit."

A repost of another MAGA influencer with over 300,000 followers sharing a Politico article about how Trump's first in-person 2026 fundraiser will be for Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) said, "I'm starting to think Trump was dropped on his head as a child. Thomas Massie is bad? But is Lindsey Graham good? Wake up, MAGA!"

Warsham, who describes herself as a constitutional conservative, says she feels betrayed by the president.

"2025 has been one giant clusterf——. To all of you who feel betrayed, disappointed, confused, I feel you in my soul. This is not the MAGA I fought for and believed in," she posted on X.

Melania used as 'window dressing' in 'pump and dump' fraud scheme resulting in millions lost

Two men behind cryptocurrency promoted by Argentine President Javier Milei and First Lady Melania Trump have been accused of engaging in fraud and exploiting “celebrity association and ‘borrowed fame’ to sell legitimacy to unsuspecting investors,” according to a new legal filing reported by The Independent.

According to Wired, a federal class action lawsuit was first brought in April against Benjamin Chow and Hayden Davis, co-founders of the crypto exchange Meteora and the venture capital firm Kelsier Labs. The duo were accused of a multimillion-dollar scam involving a single memecoin and eventually racketeering.

A new version of the complaint, submitted to court on Tuesday, "drags in the first lady, accusing Chow and Davis of pumping and dumping at least 15 crypto coins, one of which was $MELANIA," The Independent reports.

Trump willingly promoted the coin, posting a promotion for it on her official X account on January 19, the day before her husband Donald Trump’s second inauguration, in which she directed her followers to its website and wrote: “The Official Melania Meme is live! You can buy $MELANIA now.”

The lawsuit claims Trump was used as “window dressing for a crime engineered by Meteora and Kelsier.” In the case of $MELANIA, Kelsier Labs "allegedly recruited a network of crypto influencers to promote the coin on social media for a fee."

And while the coin did well on its launch, according to The Independent, "it has reportedly since lost 95 percent of its worth."

“Investors reasonably interpreted the use of Melania Trump’s name and likeness as evidence of legitimacy and due diligence – trusting that no one of her stature would knowingly associate with a fraudulent venture,” the latest version of the complaint contends.“

"The misuse of Melania Trump’s name magnified the harm,” the amended complaint concludes.

“It corrupted public trust and injected an element of political and cultural credibility into what was, in reality, a standard pump-and-dump.”

Dem senator still haranguing Trump after 18-hour marathon floor speech

Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) was still speaking after 18 hours of a marathon speech given on the House floor in protest of President Donald Trump's "authoritarian leadership," NBC News reports.

Merkley said the republic faces its biggest threat since the Civil War under Trump as he gave his opening remarks Tuesday evening at 6:30 p.m. EST.

"President Trump is shredding our Constitution. Is it okay for masked federal agents to arrest people off the street because of their skin color or their accent? No way, not in a free America," Merkley asked in his opening remarks.

The Oregon senator then went on to condemn the Trump administration for weaponizing the Department of Justice to attack his political opponents, including former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Sen. Adam Schiff, (D-CA), and canceling research grants to universities in an attempt to gain control over what can be taught.

Still speaking Wednesday morning, Merkley said that the takeaway from his speech, he hopes, is that "tyranny has already arrived. It is not down the street. It is not around the corner. It will not be encountered on the path tomorrow. It is here at this very moment."

Merkley said that conditions in America right now are ripe for tyranny.

"Suddenly, you have the three elements that create tyranny in place of freedom, or authoritarianism in place of a republic," he said. "And those are a rubber-stamp Congress, a deferential court, and an aggressive authoritarian personality with a good plan."

An aide for Merkley, who was still speaking at the time of this writing (11:57 a.m. EST), said the senator planned to speak for as long as he could go on, just as Sen. Cory Booker, (D-NJ) did months ago, delivering marathon remarks for 25 hours and 4 minutes, breaking the record for the longest floor speech in Senate history.

Trump relative says president's 'tacky' building blitz makes her 'want to die of shame'

President Donald Trump's outspoken critic niece Mary says that her uncle's desire to build an arch in Washington, DC that mimics France's Arc de Triomphe makes her "want to die of shame," according to a report in The Daily Beast.

Trump publicly unveiled his plans for the arch to commemorate the nation's 250th birthday during a dinner last week for the wealthy donors who are funding the $250 million ballroom addition to the White House that has caused outrage among many, according to the New York Times.

“Small, medium and large — whichever one, they look good,” Trump said, holding out the models to dinner guests. “I happen to think the larger one looks, by far, the best."

Wednesday in a video posted Wednesday to her Substack, the daughter of Trump's late brother Fred recoiled, saying, “That makes me want to die of shame."

"Are we still shocked that he would have the audacity and the complete lack of self-awareness to announce that he is ordering a triumphal arch to be built and placed at the entrance of the Memorial Bridge that leads from Arlington National Cemetery to the Lincoln Memorial, in honor of the 250th anniversary of the founding of this country?” she said.

The bright side, she notes, is the "prospect of one day being able to repurpose the monument, provided we 'survive' his second presidency."

Veteran journalist resigns because of magazine's censorship of Trump stories

Alan Greenbatt, the editor of Governing magazine which covers state and local governments, has resigned because he refused to go along with increasing internal pro-Trump censorship pressures, he writes in Politico.

"My decision was a long time coming," he writes. "Earlier this year, the chief content officer for our parent company, e.Republic, stated in a meeting that we should not run articles that could draw the attention of the Trump White House and have them try to shut us down."

Greenblatt says that the 40 year-old magazine is small, yet prestigious, and the "idea of anyone in the current White House was reading it, let alone preparing to hammer it, struck me as dubious."

"The notion that the litigious Trump would hit us with a lawsuit was not impossible, but it was unlikely," Greenblatt says. "But after Trump’s second term began, the corporate anxiety about rocking the boat with our coverage became a constant."

The former National Public Radio (NPR) employee cites Trump's attacks on CBS, ABC, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal and the Associated Press, "not to mention defunding NPR," but says that "the little guys too often decide they lack the resources to stand up. Capitulation becomes the easier course."

What we've seen happen in other countries is happening here, Greenblatt says.

"Self-censorship is particularly damaging because it takes place in private; in the absence of photos of reporters walking out of the Pentagon, no one even knows it’s happened," he writes.

But the "edicts" Greenblatt received during this past first year of Trump's second term, he writes, was alarming.

"I was told that an article about attitudes toward vaccines caused 'consternation' among the higher ups because that issue has become partisan. I warned my boss that if we weren’t going to reflect reality — if we weren’t going to do journalism — I’d have to quit," he writes.

And what pushed him to do just that was an article he wrote defending the First Amendment and freedom of speech in the wake of the assassination of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk and the firing of late night host Jimmy Kimmel.

"I immediately faced resistance. Although my boss said the piece was 'very well done,' she asked if it was necessary given the amount of coverage the free speech issue had already drawn," he writes.

"She told me she did not think running the piece was a good idea; after all, she noted, it violated the stated company policy against setting off alarm bells within the Trump White House," Greenblatt says.

After 20 years at the magazine, he quit, saying, "Being told I couldn’t defend free speech was almost too on the nose."

Despite the magazine trying to persuade him to stay, their unwillingness to offer him "the assurances I sought regarding editorial independence," confirmed his decision to leave.

In response to a request for comment, an e.Republic spokesperson said, “Governing’s mission is to inform and support the state and local leaders working to make government more effective. … Our journalism is intentionally nonpartisan, aimed at ensuring all perspectives are considered. That’s what our audience expects from us and what we strive to deliver. The only editorial direction we prescribe to our team is to stay within the focus of our mission and approach.”

Greenblatt says that while he applauds other journalists' decisions to do what he did in the face of censorship, "their departures are a loss."

"Fewer people who are willing to stand up and demand honest coverage remain in positions where they can make that happen. Surely the public will suffer at least a bit now that nearly all Pentagon reporters have left the building," he says.

He also says he hopes his colleagues in journalism join him in taking a stand against Trump's suppression of free speech.

As official government data becomes more politicized, it’s increasingly important that independent sources maintain their integrity," he says.

"Journalists in particular have a professional obligation to pursue and provide the truth to the best of their abilities. That’s the job. I hope and trust that most of my colleagues still have the courage to do it right."

Republican senator chastises 'rage poster in chief' Trump for tweeting too much

MAGA Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) confronted President Donald Trump about his social media posts, suggesting that posting less "won't cause brain damage," The Daily Beast reports.

“He asked me, ‘How do you like my tweets?’” Sen. Kennedy told the Pod Force One podcast on Wednesday. “I said, ‘Mr. President, don’t take this the wrong way, but tweeting a little less would not cause brain damage.’

While The Daily Beast says it's not clear when Kennedy had this conversation with the "nation's rage-poster-in-chief," but it was a lengthy one.

"“He looked at me, said, ‘You don’t like my tweets.’ I said, ‘No, I didn’t say that.’ I said, ‘I like steak, but I don’t like eight steaks at one time, Kennedy recalled. "'And you can’t just say everything that comes into your head.’”

Kennedy, who has aligned with Trump despite a few departures such as when he publicly stated that it would be unconstitutional and immoral for the Trump administration to send US citizens convicted of crimes to foreign prisons, continued to criticize Trump's penchant for posting.

“He just says anything. He says everything,” the senator went on, adding that the president appeared to have been “cool” about his suggestion.

Kennedy, The Daily Beast reports, admitted that his advice fell on deaf ears as the president most recently posted a vulgar scatalogical AI video, among other things, but says that the American people agree with him that it's just too much before offering up a familiar excuse for it.

“The American people get it,” Kennedy said. “I’m not saying my party’s perfect, but I think this is the way most Americans look at it today. People look at their choice, Democrat, Republican. They say, ‘Well, Republicans aren’t perfect, but the other side’s crazy,’” he said.

“And that’s why they elected President Trump. They know all about President Trump," Kennedy concluded.

GOP 'blindsided' as 'shocked' MAGA farmers realize they’ve 'been had' by Trump

MAGA farmers who have typically stood by President Donald Trump no matter what are "suddenly shocked" that the president has seemingly sold them out as he promises bailout money to Argentina and floats the idea of buying beef from them, according to The New Republic podcast "The Daily Blast."

Host Greg Sargent said that Trump floating the idea of buying beef from Argentina to lower prices in the United States "has caused a huge eruption. GOP senators were blindsided — they were angry that he’s looking to deal with one of the main competitors of U.S. beef farmers."

Matt Hildreth, a democratic operative who runs ruralorganizing.org and whose own family has been in farming for generations, including in cattle farming, said that while farmers have been resilient, the president's latest idea stopped them in their tracks.

"So the farmers who may have been losing money on soybeans were going to make that up on beef," he said. "And now you have Donald Trump, who’s just kind of off the cuff — or seemingly off the cuff — talking about importing beef from Argentina. And that would put American farmers in direct competition with the beef coming up from South America. And that’s going to bring down the price of beef."

As much as farmers thought they were getting ahead of Trump's "uncertainty," Hildreth said, this latest move proved to be the most shocking.

"So when Trump is throwing this uncertainty out of nowhere into the markets, it’s absolutely hitting farmers when they’re already kind of down," Hildreth said, adding "And it’s really pulling out the rug from under them on that last lifeline they had, which was the beef prices that were supporting them."

Hildreth said that farmers were prepared for "short-term pain for long-term gain," but Trump importing beef from South America completely undercuts that.

"It’s really unraveling all of what they see as the sacrifice for a long-term investment," Hildreth said, adding that "farmers and ranchers are really pissed off about what they’re seeing — but they’re starting to see it in a way, they’re seeing it in their own farm operations and their own small businesses, where, regardless of the talking points that they hear from Fox News, they can’t deny what they’re seeing in their bank accounts."

In response to Sargent asking if this will be the catalyst to farmers completely disavowing themselves from Trump, Hildreth says it won't be overnight, but something is definitely afoot.

"They see that Donald Trump has to make a choice. And his choice is either: is he going to screw over his billionaire friends in Argentina, or is he going to screw over the farmer? And he’s picking the billionaire," Hildreth said.

Trump's choices, he added, are causing farmers to rethink their undying loyalty to the president.

"And I think that people are starting to see this corruption — and the fact that the only people who seem to be benefiting right now are Donald Trump’s billionaire friends. And I think that’s something that’s cracking through," he said. " I don’t know if it’s going to be a dam break, but I think the margins are starting to shift in places that I actually would not have expected. And I think that’s a really good thing."

Hildreth said that "there's going to be a record number of bankruptcies in agriculture" that will further erode Trump's support among farmers.

"I don’t think they’re going to be sticking with Trump like he expected them to," he said. They also "know that their workforce is being decimated by Donald Trump’s immigration policies" and not even Fox News can convince them otherwise.

"Fox News would come up with some sort of talking point — they would somehow blame Democrats for something Trump did," Hildreth said. "But that’s not happening anymore. And it’s just so overwhelming that I think people are starting to realize that they’ve been had a little bit."

'MAGA civil war' as influencer turns on Marjorie Taylor Greene for 'stabbing Trump in the back'

One of President Donald Trump's most loyal internet defenders has turned on Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), saying she has betrayed the president with her recent critique of him and the Republican party, Newsweek reports.

The anonymous social media account known as "Cat——", which has 3.9 million followers, complained that the Republican congresswoman had been "stabbing Trump in the back at every turn" and called for her to be primaried.

Last week, Mediaite reported that Greene was no longer following one of its social media accounts "amid a MAGA civil war."

Greene's vocal pushback against the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the release of files associated with the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and foreign policy measures has "triggered a backlash from some MAGA influencers," Newsweek says.

Cat—— shared an image claiming Greene had made $21 million in five years in Congress and said it was "time to primary and get rid of this fraud."

They also said Greene, who has said her high net worth comes from her family's construction business and personal investments, was "getting filthy rich while stabbing Trump in the back at every turn."

"I'm so tired of these complete and utter phonies," they wrote, adding in a subsequent post. "Marjorie Taylor Greene is so cringe now. I feel like taking a bath because I ever supported her. She’s a total fraud who’s gotten filthy rich in a few short years in Congress."

Greene doesn't seem to care what they think, telling NBC News earlier this month, “I’m not some sort of blind slave to the president, and I don’t think anyone should be.”

Trump biographer files legal complaint against Melania Trump for Epstein silencing

Journalist and President Donald Trump biographer Michael Wolff has filed a legal complaint against first lady Melania Trump, accusing her, along with her husband, of making "a practice of threatening those who speak against them," reports TheWrap.

This follows a threat from the first lady's legal team to sue Wolff over a claim published in a July 2025 Daily Beast article that linked her to late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

According to the BBC, Wolff reportedly told the Daily Beast that Melania Trump was known to associate with Epstein when she met her husband.

In October 2025, her legal team sent a letter to President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, threatening to sue him over a claim that she was introduced to Donald Trump by Jeffrey Epstein. Hunter made the claim during an interview with filmmaker Andrew Callaghan, and he stated that the information came in part from Wolff.

In court documents obtained by TheWrap, Wolff claims the first lady sent a threat letter, which demanded the journalist apologize by Tuesday over “false, defamatory, disparaging, misleading and inflammatory statements” he allegedly made about her and her connection to the Epstein scandal — or be sued for $1 billion in damages.

Wolff, who was considering writing a book on Epstein, was defended by his attorney who said he was simply doing his job “diligently,” which included asking “important questions that deserve inquiry.”

Wolff's legal complaint excoriated the Trumps, saying, “Mrs. Trump and her ‘unitary executive’ husband along with their MAGA myrmidons have made a practice of threatening those who speak against them with costly SLAPP actions in order to silence their speech, to intimidate their critics generally and to extract unjustified payments and North Korea style confession and apologies.”

Wolff, who is seeking legal fees and compensatory damages, added, “These threatened legal actions are designed to create a climate of fear in the nation so that people cannot freely or confidently exercise their First Amendment rights. The threats are also intended to shut down legitimate inquiry into the Epstein matter which the Trumps and their collaborators have at every turn sought to impede and suppress.”

The complaint condemned the first lady's tactics to silence freedom of speech — especially when it comes to the Epstein scandal.

“[Mrs. Trump’s claims] impede and chill future reporting and writing that Mr. Wolff has committed to doing regarding Epstein, Mr. Trump and Mrs. Trump,” the complaint added. “In many respects that is the primary purpose of these claims,” it said.

Young Republicans busted for racist chat stiffed NY hotel on booze, food bill after 'lavish' party

Besides thousands of leaked chat messages left behind by a group of young Republicans, members of the New York State branch also left unpaid bills from "extravagant gatherings" before the group disbanded in disgrace, according to Syracuse.com.

At two of those events, the NY State Young Republicans "ran up bills of more than $23,000 over a weekend at a Syracuse hotel – spending big on a three-course plated dinner with filet mignon and open bars — but then didn’t pay," according to records obtained by Syracuse.com.

According to the report, The Embassy Suites Hotel at Destiny USA hosted the group’s Teddy Roosevelt awards dinner last year, and made a "rare exception to its rule for customers to pay in advance of using its banquet facilities."

"But the hotel’s goodwill quickly evaporated as its managers spent four months trying to collect what it was owed," according to billing documents and 110 pages of internal emails reviewed by Syracuse.com.

Peter Giunta, the club president who stepped down last month offered the hotel's "increasingly urgent emails" with a "series of excuses," reports the website. Shortly after his resignation, Politico reported that his group owed $14,000 for a 2023 holiday party in Manhattan.

Giunta was publicly identified as having made antisemitic remarks, including jokes about gas chambers, in the leaked Telegram chats.

"The Young Republicans’ previously unreported debt in Syracuse followed on the heels of the Manhattan party and a trip by Giunta and club leaders to Nashville last year when he was campaigning for a position to lead the Young Republicans on a national level," reports Syracuse.com.

In a since-deleted social media post, a former Trump campaign staffer said the group owed $7,000 to Redneck Riviera, a bar and live music venue in Nashville owned by country singer and MAGA diehard John Rich.

A list of the group's Syracuse expenses included charges for meals at Dave and Busters at Destiny USA ($95.45) and the Dinosaur Bar-B-Que ($38.35) and a tab for $198 at the Gilded Club cocktail bar in Armory Square.

The report also listed expenses for meals at P.F. Chang’s ($112.61) and Texas de Brazil ($84.25), both located at the mall the that houses the Embassy Suites.

Giunta told the hotel to prepare 125 dinners, a three-course meal that cost $65 per plate for steak and $38 per plate for chicken, for the $200-per-person event, according to bills viewed by Syracuse.com.

Less than half showed up and the hotel ended up throwing away 66 dinners that were charged to the New York State Young Republicans, Syracuse.com reports.

The club also ran up a tab of $5,794 at the open bar that included “deluxe cocktails.” A separate bar tab totaled $2,052 for the opening night reception, records show.

“I’m not surprised you’re writing this story,” Danielle Neuser, former director of sales at the Destiny Embassy Suites, said when contacted by a Syracuse.com reporter. “I just knew based on how he handled us that he was doing that in many different places. I think this kid is so full of BS and just was making up answers to kind of keep people at bay.”

Neuser, now president of the Greater Syracuse Hospitality and Tourism Association, said it was "only the second time in her 30-plus years in the business that she could recall a client that made so many excuses over a prolonged period for not paying their bill."

“I saw through him from the day before the event, where he said he was going to come with a check,” she said. “And then he had like 13 excuses: That somebody forgot the checkbook and he didn’t have it. Then there was a fraud. And their bank account was compromised. It was like this kid had every excuse in the book.”

Former Onondaga County Republican Committee chair Benedicte Doran told Syracuse.com that she tried to get Giunta to pay, too.

“I did everything I could to get the guy to do the right thing, and he didn’t do it,” Doran said. “He’s just a bad guy.”

Only after the hotel banned Giunta, and club members from future visits to the property and threatened a lawsuit, did he come up with "sporadic payments that eventually whittled the debt down to $7,257.14," the documents show.

“I am shocked and saddened by the alleged past wrongdoings that we have uncovered, and it is my duty to the members of and donors to this organization to restore its financial stability,” the state club's vice chair Becky Oliveira said in a statement.

The most recent financial disclosure report from September shows the club in the red, with unpaid debts of $38,560.

Onondaga County Young Republicans chapter chair Ethan LaMontagne told Syracuse.com he was unaware of the unpaid bills in Syracuse. He said the local chapter suspended its involvement with Giunta and the statewide organization after the group’s chat was made public.

“We are disgusted by the racism, antisemitism, bigotry, and homophobia that was revealed,” LaMontagne said in a statement. “There is no place for this kind of hatred within the Republican Party or our movement. As Young Republicans, we stand by integrity, respect, and the principles of liberty and opportunity for all.”

Gossip site stands by story on possible Diddy commutation despite Trump White House denial

On Monday, gossip website TMZ reported that President Donald Trump was considering a pardon of disgraced music mogul Sean "Diddy" Combs, who is currently serving a 50 month prison sentence. And, despite the White House pushing back against the claim, TMZ says it stands by its story, according to MSNBC.

Combs was convicted in July on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, but was acquitted on the more damning charges of racketeering and sex trafficking.

Following Combs's sentencing, Trump was asked about a potential pardon for the rapper in an interview with Newsmax.

"You know, I was very friendly with him. I got along with him great and seemed like a nice guy. I didn’t know him well," Trump said. "But when I ran for office, he was very hostile."

In the Monday report, TMZ said "that the president was 'vacillating' on a commutation for the music mogul, citing a 'high-ranking White House official'" as their source.

Combs' lawyers have previously told NBC News they have been pursuing a pardon for their client.

A spokesperson for the White House told NBC News in a statement that "there is zero truth to the TMZ report, which we would’ve gladly explained had they reached out before running their fake news. The President, not anonymous sources, is the final decider on pardons and commutations."

On Friday, Trump sparked outrage when he commuted the prison sentence of disgraced former New York Representative George Santos, who was serving a 7-year sentence for federal fraud charges, but did not grant him a pardon.

TMZ, known for breaking stories on the deaths of major celebrities, shot down the White House denial.

"We stand by our story," Casey Carver, a spokesperson for TMZ, said in a brief statement.

Trump defenders float seizing South American country as another 51st state

Fox News host Sean Hannity that President Donald Trump should forget Canada and make Venezuela America's 51st state, according to The Daily Beast.

This suggestion comes after the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, dedicated it to Trump and “the suffering people of Venezuela." Trump and his supporters relentlessly campaigned for him to win the prize.

“I dedicated this award to the Venezuelan people and President Trump because I believe that’s absolutely fair,” Machado, a Trump supporter, said. “We, the Venezuelan people, are absolutely grateful to President Trump for the way he has supported democracy and freedom in the Americas.”

“This opposition leader in Venezuela that won the Nobel Prize, and said it really deserved to go to Donald Trump, sounds like a pretty good leader to me for the people of Venezuela, and the end of narcoterrorism, and a better relationship with the U.S.,” Hannity said to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). “Or, if they choose, maybe the 51st state.”

“Sounds good to me!” Graham exclaimed.

While Trump may not 'get' Venezeula as the 51st state, he does think he still has a shot at the Nobel Peace Prize.

"So the person who actually got the Nobel prize called today, called me and said, I’m accepting this in honor of you because you really deserved it,” he said at a press conference. “I didn’t say, ‘Then give it to me,’ though. I could have. I think she might have.”

Trump lawyers target Murdoch and 'mean-spirited' Wall Street Journal in Epstein lawsuit

President Donald Trump wants a federal judge to allow his defamation suit against The Wall Street Journal to go forward because he says the newspaper's 2003 letter linking him to the late convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was “deliberate and malicious," Newsweek reports.

Trump also says he should be allowed to continue the case because the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper said his denial of the letter's legitimacy was 'false."

Newsweek reports that in a filing submitted October 20 in the Southern District of Florida, Trump’s lawyers said the Journal and its parent company, News Corp., along with Murdoch and senior editors, “prioritize gossip, clicks and profit over truth.”

Donald Trump filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch in July over a story regarding a birthday letter Trump allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. That article was titled Jeffrey Epstein’s Friends Sent Him Bawdy Letters for a 50th Birthday Album. One Was From Donald Trump.

In September, The Wall Street Journal filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, asserting that its reporting was accurate.

The October filing responds to Trump's motion to dismiss the suit, and asserts the newspaper’s reporting was substantially true and protected by the First Amendment.

The president accuses the Journal of framing its coverage to make his denial appear untrue, Newsweek explains.

“Although defendants included plaintiff’s denial, they did so in a way that made it seem as if plaintiff’s denial was false,” the filing states. “This kind of reckless disregard for the truth by defendants provides a sufficient basis for an inference of actual malice.”

Trump’s legal team also argues "the article was defamatory both per se — because it allegedly subjected him to 'hatred, disgust, ridicule, contempt or disgrace' — and per quod, requiring additional context to show harm to his reputation," Newsweek says.

The filing says the piece “wrongly and inextricably link[ed] President Trump to the disgraced Epstein,” and that the Journal’s use of phrases such as “one of them was Donald Trump” left readers with the impression that he was a willing participant in the birthday project.

Trump's attorneys also accuse the Journal of not being nice to the president.

"They claim the story’s 'mean-spirited tone' and the Journal’s alleged hostility toward Trump support an inference of malice," Newsweek says.

The Journal's lawyers have laughed off Trump's requests, saying, “This meritless lawsuit threatens to chill the speech of those who dare to publish content that the president does not like.”

Legal experts agree that the Journal has the upper hand here.

“In the case of The Wall Street Journal, it would literally have to be the case that they knew the letter was false or knew it didn’t exist or they had a really good reason to suspect it was forged but ignored it," Shawn Trier, a constitutional-law expert told ABC News

Contractors are bringing 'sample slabs of granite' to White House for Trump to review 'himself'

As the government remains shut down, construction goes on at the White House, where President Donald Trump has demolished the facade of part of the East Wing to make way for his $250 million ballroom. On Tuesday, right wing media outlets reported that Trump was personally selecting slabs of granite for the project.

"Walked into the White House this morning with a construction worker who had several sample slabs of granite. He told Secret Service they were samples for President Trump to review. That's ballroom construction behind-the-scenes!" wrote Daily Caller White House correspondent Reagan Reese on X.

The Daily Wire's White House correspondent Mary Margaret Olohan confirmed the story, posting on X, "I also overheard a little of his conversation with the Secret Service, who were asking him a bit incredulously, 'These are to go to the president himself?' They did call in extra verification."

The reporters' MAGA followers on X expressed outrage at the reporting.

"Sending billion to Israel and Argentina while the [government] is shutdown and we’re talking about a ... ballroom," wrote one.

On the more left-leaning Bluesky, one critic says it doesn't really matter what Trump picks to tile his ballroom.

"Tearing out 1950s hand plaster work to put in Holiday Inn marble and granite. It will eventually look like a cheap strip club in South Dallas. Trump has zero artistic taste. Just look at all his gold trinkets, bowls, cups [and] all that gold foil stuff stuck on the walls and fireplace. He's not well," wrote Bob Fisher.

WH 'aware' of 'problematic' optics as Treasury demands staff 'refrain' from construction pics

The viral optics of a demolished East Wing at the White House appears to be a concern for the Trump administration, which issued an email Monday to staff at the Treasury Department warning them not to post any more pictures of it, according to CNN.

“As construction proceeds on the White House grounds, employees should refrain from taking and sharing photographs of the grounds, to include the East Wing, without prior approval from the Office of Public Affairs,” the email reads, according to a Treasury official.

The photos of the construction of President Donald Trump's $250 million ballroom went viral Monday showing a demolished East Wing despite Trump's earlier promises that it wouldn’t “interfere” with the existing White House structure.

The Wall Street Journal broke the story and quoted a Treasury Department spokesman who said the email was sent to employees because photos could “potentially reveal sensitive items, including security features or confidential structural details.”

Social media lit up in reaction to the Treasury email, but consensus is this "concern" is too little, too late, if at all genuine.

Attorney Aaron Parnas wrote, "The White House has ordered Treasury Department employees not to share pictures of the White House demolition according to the Wall Street Journal. It would be a shame if this picture went viral then."

Journalist Chris Geidner put out a call for even more pictures from the Treasury on his Bluesky account, writing, "If you’re at Treasury and can share any pictures, my Signal is crg.32."

"Now remember everyone, just because it's true doesn't mean you're allowed to say it. You work for the government. You're job is to toe the line and make Dear Leader look good," wrote X influencer and writer Rogue Potus Staff.

MAGA diehard goes after one of his own over 'unacceptable' photo op

Steve Bannon, MAGA podcaster and former chief strategist to President Donald Trump, slammed Secretary of State Marco Rubio Monday for a photo-op Rubio took when visiting Israel in September, according to The Daily Beast.

Rubio's visit to Jerusalem came "on the heels of Israel’s shock airstrikes against Qatar, which lit a fire under the Trump administration’s efforts to end the brutal war in Gaza," reports The Daily Beast, and it included a stop at the famous Wailing Wall, where Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "welcomed him with open arms."

Bannon's relationship with Israel is complex and has shifted over time, reflecting internal divisions within the American right.

While his media platform has historically been pro-Israel, Bannon himself has made critical and controversial statements, especially recently, suggesting a turn towards a more "America First" nationalist perspective.

Needless to say, the photo of Rubio at the Wailing Wall did not go over well with Bannon, who, on Monday's episode of his podcast, "scolded Rubio for failing to send 'a message' that the U.S. would not tolerate any more surprises," The Daily Beast says.

“When Netanyahu fired on Qatar… he had enough, he sent Marco over... to give it to him with both barrels, [to say] ‘This is not acceptable, you’re not going to do this,’” Bannon said.

And despite Trump blasting Qatar as "funders of terrorism" in his first term, he took a private jet as a gift from them and issued a "watered down" version of NATO’s Article 5 collective defense agreement, which says an attack on one of our NATO allies is an attack on all, adding that an attack on Qatar is an attack on America.

Bannon was not pleased.

"And what did Rubio do? Posed at the Wailing Wall with a yarmulke,” Bannon scoffed. “If you want a greater Israel project, we’re not gonna stop you. We’re just not gonna support it,” he added.

GOP senators condemn Trump’s 'punitive' targeting of blue states

More Republican senators are going on record against President Donald Trump's targeting of blue states as he freezes transportation funding from New York and Massachussetts, reports The Hill.

While Republicans are unified in saying the Democrats are holding "government funding hostage" in exchange for healthcare concessions during the government shutdown, more are growing "uncomfortable about halting transportation funding to certain states because they are represented by Democrats in Washington," The Hill says.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-A) has been openly critical, saying projects that have been already approved and funded, such as the construction of a new rail tunnel beneath the Hudson River to facilitate travel and commerce between Manhattan and New Jersey whichTrump terminated, will hurt people in those states regardless of their own political views.

“You show me one blue state in America where you don’t have pockets, maybe even big pockets, of Republicans, of conservatives, of MAGA people, of pro-Trump. Do we not care about them?” she said.

“Are we just saying, ‘If you don’t like it, you should move to a place where you’ve got a Republican governor?’” she added. “It makes no sense. Why are we being punitive? It’s hard enough when the government is not operating as it should be. Let’s not be punitive to Americans just to score political points.”

White House budget director Russell Vought doubled down, announcing the administration will be “immediately pausing over $11 billion” in projects in New York, San Francisco, Boston, Baltimore and other Democratic strongholds.

In response to this, Senate Appropriations committee chair Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) said, "I’m not for that, I’m not in favor of that" before criticizing Democrats for blocking the "clean" House-passed government funding stopgap.

Joining Murkowski and Collins in their condemnation of Trump targeting Blue states is Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS), who, reports The Hill, "argued that funding authority rests with Congress and that projects should be funded — or defunded — on the basis of their merit, not as acts of political patronage or retaliation."

Asked if he thought it was appropriate to dole out or rescind funds as a matter of political patronage or revenge, Moran replied, “No, I don’t. It is not about what political party, what color your state is associated with, it’s about the value of the project, which is determined by Congress and implemented by the administration."

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-WVA) agreed, saying that "punishing blue states by withholding transportation funding that Congress approved on a bipartisan basis in the past could boomerang on Republicans when Democrats control the White House and Congress."

When asked if it was appropriate for Trump to freeze funding from states just because they are represented by Democrats in Washington, she said, “I wouldn’t think so. The shoe’s going to be on the other foot someday and I don’t think that’s a good precedent to set."

Here’s why a swing state Dem governor was in deep red Florida

Governor Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) is traveling the country to ramp up Democratic messaging ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, and she stopped in deep red Florida, reports The Miami Herald.

Whitmer spent Sunday and Monday in South Florida fundraising for the Florida Democratic Party alongside Miami mayoral candidate Eileen Higgins.

The Michigan governor, who flipped the governor's mansion by spending time in Republican area,s says it's strategy that's leading her into unfamiliar territory.

“There are areas in my state that are very red on a political map that many Democrats wouldn’t bother showing up at. I do,” Whitmer said in an interview Monday with the Herald.

As of October 2025, Michigan has a divided government and is not a fully Republican-controlled state. The state government is split, with Democrats holding the governorship and control of the State Senate, while Republicans control the State House of Representatives.

Having shifted from its former status as a critical swing state, Florida is now a reliably red state where Republicans now dominate statewide and presidential elections and hold significant majorities in the state legislature.

Whitmer has proven she knows how to navigate through seas of red.

“Not writing off a community because it looks red on a political map, but actually getting in there, engaging with people to make sure we stay focused on the things that matter," has been the key to Whitmer's political success.

“If I can undo it fast, it can be done again quickly, so we can’t let up for a second. That’s why I’m here to do more listening than talking," she said.

Whitmer, who has caused a bit of controversy by maintaining a more cordial relationship with President Donald Trump than most governors of blue states, has taken a prominent messaging role as Democrats try to find their voice in Donald Trump’s second term, focusing on making economic issues a centerpoint in the midterms — including in Florida.

“Right here in Miami-Dade, you’ve got the largest number of people that are going to be impacted [by healthcare cuts] in the country in this area. We know that the ability to find affordable housing is not just a need in Michigan, it’s a need right here with some of the highest housing costs in the country” Whitmer said. “These are fundamentals that keep people from being able to get ahead.”

Florida Democrats, the Herald reports, have been largely written off by national funding arms in recent election cycles, a replicating curse after years of struggles to win statewide races. When the Herald asked Whitmer whether her visit a year out from the midterms is any indication national Democratic investment could return to the largely-hung-out-to-dry Florida Democrats, she was vague.

“I can’t speak on behalf of the DNC, I don’t have a role there, but I will say this: our success in Michigan is absolutely interlinked with showing up everywhere, talking to everybody,” she said.

Whitmer was also in Florida to promote her new memoir, a move the Herald calls a "very pre-presidential" one even if Whitmer says that's not her priority — yet.

“I have no plans to run for president in 2028,” she told the Herald. “I am actually here because what we’re trying to do is make sure that as we go into midterms next year that we’re running on an agenda that really reflects what people need," before adding, "I’m hopeful that there are some Democratic governors who are in serious contention."

“I don’t know that I’ve got to be the main character in the next chapter, but I certainly want to have a hand in helping write it," she said.

History’s most heinous dictator on a rehabilitation tour — thanks to right-wing media: expert

With "uncharismatic pretenders and Nazi wannabe heirs waiting in the wings" as President Donald Trump towers over the "rightist movement," much of MAGA is fixated on trying to rehabilitate Adolf Hitler and that makes them "easy prey," writes journalist Noah Smith.

Last week, Politico revealed thousands of racist, antisemitic, and violent text messages exchanged within a private Telegram chat among leaders and members of the Young Republican National Federation, which Smith says was hardly shocking.

The leaks led to a backlash from the GOP, with the New York and Kansas chapters of the Young Republicans getting shut down, a Vermont state senator stepping down, and a handful of other participants losing their jobs. "(JD Vance didn’t join in, making excuses for the “kids” in the chat group, even though they were in their late 20s or 30s)," Smith notes.

Despite the few incidents of condemnation, Smith says, it's not good enough.

"It’s good to see that the institutions of the Republican Party still have enough power — and enough of a conscience — to crack down on things like this, at least a little bit," he writes. "But it’s unlikely that official censure or condemnations will stem the trend toward authoritarianism and racial hatred among the party’s younger members."

Smith says that the leaked texts were tame compared to what's actually going on in the right-wing-populated darker web.

"In fact, if anything, what’s surprising is that the mainstream media seems to have been so blindsided by texts that were so tame compared to what gets said on public forums like X and 4chan every day," he says.

Today's right-wingers, Smith notes, are aligning themselves much more with the Third Reich.

"There is a lot more unabashed Hitlerism than in the Young Republicans’ group chat. Popular right-wing accounts now regularly ridicule the widespread belief that Hitler was evil as a 'religion' or a 'myth'," Smith says.

Politico's leaked chats revealed a “the love of Nazis within their party’s right wing," Smith says. "In fact, attempts to rehabilitate Hitler are becoming more common all across the right-wing media ecosystem."

Smith cites former Fox News host "Tucker Carlson’s embrace of a revisionist historian who calls Winston Churchill the true villain of World War 2, claims that Hitler actually wanted peace, and declared that Hitler conquering France was preferable to a modern drag show."

Smith calls this a "new trend of Hitler apologia on the right," fueled by the fact that most who fought Hitler in World War II are long gone and not here to dispute their jokes and revisionist history.

And while leftists, he says, don't like Hitler, "the rise of the Palestine movement on the left probably contributed to the trend," as well, he explains, giving "rightists a green light to unleash their own much more virulent antisemitism without fear of leftist attack."

Social media, he says, also rewards extremism with extremist views tending to go viral more than more temperate ones, he says.

And by boosting extremists, "social media exposes everyone to maximum threat from the other side; when some random clout-chasing pseudonymous progressive calls normal Republicans “Nazis” for restricting immigration, those Republicans may feel like the whole progressive movement is calling them 'Nazis,' he says.

"This may make some of them simply give up on the idea of policing their actual Nazi extremists in order to maintain respectability, because they may feel that this is a lost cause."

The combination of all these factors is "allowing the worst voices on the American right to rehabilitate Adolf Hitler," he says, and while Trump is more of a "corrupt personalist Peronist" as opposed to a Nazi, Smith says his end is nigh.

Trump "will cease to be coherent or sharp enough to control the GOP or determine the direction of the MAGA movement," he writes, and "In the absence of a towering charismatic figure, the movement that Trump built will have to be held together by ideology."

This is where the revisionist, rehabbed vision of Hitler comes in, he explains.

"The idea of the Great Replacement — that immigration is a plot to subjugate both the White race and the Republican party — will be absolutely core to that ideology," he explains. "Rightists believe that Hitler’s place as the Great Satan in America’s folk memory gives liberals and leftists a moral trump card, and so they feel like they need to deemphasize the evil of the Nazis in order to level the political playing field."

Trump's immigration sweeps and urban crackdowns may leave MAGA in a difficult position to retain minority votes, Smith says, "but hating on Jews may allow them to hold on to a few foolish guys who don’t realize that Hitler would have sent them to the gas chambers too."

As a result, Smith notes, the "MAGA movement is probably going to become more Nazi-adjacent and Nazi-apologetic when Trump’s personal influence fades," and, "while things will probably get worse before they get better," it will be easier to fight this post-Trump MAGA, he says.

"It’s a lot easier to fight against an army of grim, cruel Hitler apologists than it is to battle a charismatic populist, and basically no demographic group in America is actually majority antisemitic," he says, adding, "America is unlikely to stand for actual Nazism."

Feds 'feeling the heat' as Trump official no-shows court appearance in 'unusual' move

CNN anchor Boris Sanchez reports that federal law enforcement is starting to feel the heat as a Chicago judge condemns the Trump administration's tactics, saying that there are still reports of tear gas being deployed without warning.

U.S. District Court Judge Sara Ellis, a Barack Obama appointee, ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement field director Russell Hott to appear in court Monday. But he returned to Washington, D.C. that same day on what the Department of Homeland Security calls a "planned return."

Former federal prosecutor and POLITICO senior writer Ankush Kardori says that Hott's failure to appear in Chicago is not typical.

"Usually when a judge requests a specific government official show up, they expect that official to show up, and that person shows up. So, no, it's unusual," he says.

Instead, two federal officials are taking Hott's place and testifying instead, answering questions from the judge about the use of tear gas, who ordered the tear gas and who was directing them to do so. Kardori doesn't think they will offer much.

"This has been a big issue, actually, with some of the government's representations in court. They will put people up who know little to nothing about the relevant issues. So I expect her to put some pressure on that level of analysis," he says.

When Sanchez asked Kardori how a judge knows whether their orders are being followed or not, he said, "She's doing what she should be doing. She's seen a report, some indication that it's not being followed, right? For instance, tear gas being used in a residential neighborhood. Her order required that that only occur if there's some sort of actual threat, imminent threat to the officers."

The judge, who on Thursday ordered "all agents who are operating in Operation Midway Blitz ... to wear body-worn cameras," sparked controversy among ICE agents who don't want to work with FBI agents wearing body cameras.

The Department of Justice, Kardori explained, is "opposing this."

The use of body cameras is a complicated area of the law, Kardori said.

"And there are exceptions. It's not necessarily mandated across all federal officers. But I do think in this particular context, she is right to be sort of pushing the line on this," he added. "I think I think it's become apparent, quite honestly, that the anonymity of the agents they're masking has become areal problem."

'Voter apathy' and 'a lot of lies' transformed 'hippie surfer haven' into CA’s 'angriest MAGA city'

Although President Ronald Reagan once called California's Orange County the place where "good Republicans go to die," the "hippie beachside surfer haven" of Huntington Beach, SFGATE's Anabel Sosa writes, "has drawn national attention for leaning dramatically further to the right."

Just a few years ago, Sosa says, Huntington Beach had a Democratic-led city council. Today, the city's 200,000 residents are represented by a conservative majority city council — an all-Republican group that calls itself the "MAGA-nificent Seven."

That group has been on the front lines of MAGA's culture wars, from bans on children's books and pride flags to opposing vaccines and mask mandates and "dissolving a watchdog committee formed in the aftermath of white supremacist hate crimes in the 1990s."

These actions, Sosa says, have "shoved the seaside paradise into uncharted territory."

The city, she writes, "has a Republican stronghold of just over 56,000 registered Republican voters, compared to a little more than 41,000 Democrats."

Republican Mayor Pat Burns, one of those so-called seven, explained the city's leaning, saying “It’s a middle class town, basically. We just want to live our lives with as little government control as possible.”

Former Democratic city council member Dan Kalmick told SFGATE that "the fights were always over housing," but Mayor Burns, Sosa explains, "has stood firm against California’s state housing law, which mandates that every city keeps up with state requirements for adding housing."

As a result, Huntington Beach "has been out of compliance since the law’s passage in 2021, and is currently 13,368 housing units short," she writes.

Burns, who was sworn into office in 2024 said, that California is “trying to force us to do something that we don’t need," making the city build “low-income” housing to make Huntington Beach "more urban," because, he says, "Urban places turn blue.”

A September court decision determined Huntington Beach has 120 days to comply with its housing requirements. Burns said that “poor” people can live by the beach, but “it shouldn’t be subsidized.”

State Sen. Tony Strickland (R-CA) has supported said that Huntington Beach residents "care about three things: public safety, their love of America and to remain suburban."

Kalmick says the reason conservatives have had success is due to “voter apathy” and “a lot of lies.” The divide has only deepened as elected officials struggle to work together, Sosa explains.

City councilwoman city councilwoman Gracey Van Der Mark told SFGATE she was a Democrat until she “realized” that Latinos are inherently conservative.

She said were her priorities were “family first, believe in God, embrace culture,” adding that Democrats want to “exclude parents, break up families, sow division, bash our men.”

The city has been no stranger to white supremacy either, with a 1993 LA Times headline asking if Huntington Beach was “the skinhead capital of the count." And, Sosa writes, "as the 21st century began, the city increasingly became a hub for violent incidents against minority groups."

Kalmack says the city has become "center ground" for protests, but they may not be enough.

Pat Goodman, a co-organizer at ProtectHB, a non-profit organization that led the opposition to the city's library book ban, said her biggest fear is “there will be a very short list of candidates” running for city council next year. “That means we can look at another four years of similar elected officials.”

Kalmack agrees, saying the city has a long way to go before it returns to its Democratic roots.

“I don’t think Huntington Beach is winnable until the next 10 years,” he said.

Trump goes on bizarre rant about 400-year-old mirror during Australia prime minister meeting

Editor’s Note: This headline has been updated.

During a Monday meeting with Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at the White House, President Donald Trump went off on a bizarre rant after a cameraman accidentally hit a mirror.

The talks between the two were slated to focus on defense and trade — particularly on Australia's rare earth minerals, the AUKUS security pact and Chinese trade restrictions.

“You got to watch that. Watch that. You're not allowed to break that. That mirror is 400 years old. The camera just hit the mirror," Trump said.

“I just moved it up here special from the vaults," he continued as the Australian prime minister looked on. "And the first thing that happens, the camera hits it. Hard to believe, isn't it? Hard to believe. But these are the problems in life."

"A 400-year-old mirror gets more protection than our democracy," remarked one social media observer.

Psychologist Dr. John Gartner told The Daily Beast Podcast’s Joanna Coles that Trump's tendencies to go off on tangents points to his cognitive decline.

"He really is losing his ability to think clearly, to plan, to understand things and to inhibit his speech and his behavior,” Gartner said.

Yacht Rock king demands 'immediate' removal of song used in Trump’s vulgar AI dump

Singer Kenny Loggins has demanded the immediate removal of his greatest hit "Danger Zone" from President Donald Trump's AI video depicting him dropping fecal matter on No Kings protesters, according to Variety.

Following the massive No Kings protest Saturday, which saw an estimated 7 to 10 million protesters, the president shared a video depicting him in a fighter jet dropping what appeared to be feces on U.S. protesters to the tune of one of Loggins' greatest hits.

“This is an unauthorized use of my performance of ‘Danger Zone.’ Nobody asked me for my permission, which I would have denied, and I request that my recording on this video is removed immediately,” Loggins said in a statement shared with Variety on Monday.

The singer's “Danger Zone” was used in the 1986 Tom Cruise film “Top Gun,” which is what Trump’s vulgar AI video seems to be paying homage to, Variety says.

“I can’t imagine why anybody would want their music used or associated with something created with the sole purpose of dividing us. Too many people are trying to tear us apart, and we need to find new ways to come together,” Loggins said.

“We’re all Americans, and we’re all patriotic. There is no ‘us and them’ — that’s not who we are, nor is it what we should be. It’s all of us. We’re in this together, and it is my hope that we can embrace music as a way of celebrating and uniting each and every one of us.”

BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.