The first Republican primary debate, as expected, was really awkward. Former President Donald Trump was not in the room but also very much in the room. Even while it appeared the eight presidential candidates standing on the stage might actually succeed in ignoring Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 election until the last half of the debate.
They certainly tried. Asked if former Vice President Mike Pence did the right thing that day by ignoring Trump’s demands to reject electoral votes cast for Joe Biden, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis danced around the question until Pence himself forced an answer. “Mike did his duty,” said DeSantis. “I got no beef with him.”
Slow clap for DeSantis, whose team apparently did not prepare him to answer perhaps the most obvious question any Republican candidate could possibly have been asked in the first debate. He’d only just acknowledged Trump’s loss two weeks prior to the debate, so it sort of boggles the mind he wasn’t more prepared for this.
But the criticism I’m lodging here is broader. DeSantis didn’t offer the only clumsy answer — far from it — and that it took half the debate to get around to such an obvious point speaks volumes. Voters need to know what candidates believe was the right thing to do that day, but neither the Republican Party nor many of its candidates are prepared to deal with it — a frustrating and puzzling failure given the two-and-a-half years that have passed.
The only candidate on the stage with a coherent message on the issue was Pence himself. He took a surprisingly straightforward approach during the debate, demanding answers from his opponents and raising his voice to defend his actions on Jan. 6. Words like “surprisingly” and “demanding” are not usually words one uses in a sentence about Mike Pence.
But he was the only one. And even he, along with most of the others, said they would still support Trump if he was the nominee even if he was convicted of a crime, with no one really addressing the incongruity of their praises for Pence’s actions with their willingness to support Trump for another term.
Despite having all of those people on stage, we genuinely don’t know what most of them would do if faced with similar circumstances.
That discordance goes well beyond the eight people standing on that stage, though. To this day, few of the people that should have straight answers do.
Trump was supposed to have a press conference this week where he laid out absolute proof of his claims about voter fraud in Georgia. This newsletter is not about that press conference because it didn’t happen. On Truth Social, he said he intends to instead offer the proof in “formal legal filings.” I guess we’ll have to keep waiting.
It’s hard to get a straight answer from most Republican leaders about their 2020 views, even when the stakes are low.
This week, for example, Donald Palmer, a Republican commissioner with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, appointed by Trump, participated in a Twitter Spaces event aimed at poll worker recruitment that, for some reason, was titled “How to Stop the Steal.” So I emailed the agency with a straightforward question: “Does Commissioner Donald Palmer believe the 2020 election was stolen?”
It took three separate emails and two days of prompting to get a sort-of straight answer:
“The EAC Commissioners believe that U.S. elections are secure and fair.”
Oh.
It’s not great that most Republican candidates and some sitting officials don’t have straightforward answers to straightforward questions about a nearly three-year-old event. And now that 2024 is staring us straight in the face, it’s even more unnerving to hear mealymouthed answers about the previous presidential election.
Pence was right when he characterized his actions on Jan. 6 as a decisive moment of leadership that those seeking similar positions of power should articulate a stance on. He is one of the few willing to do such a thing.
And that matters, because post-2020 America has a completely new type of political crisis — an election crisis — that could emerge to test a president. Remember the famous Hillary Clinton ad about the 3 a.m. phone call, and who would be prepared to answer it? Right now, it’s hard to tell.
This week’s history lesson is more of a PSA: 50,000 women in Boston registered in 1920 after the 19th Amendment was ratified, and now we can meet them. Reports WBUR: “Evidence of that historic moment 103 years ago have long been available in the form of 160 volumes of voter registration records in the city’s archives. Now, a team of archivists and transcribers are digitizing them and making the records searchable as part of the Mary Eliza Project: Boston Women Voters in 1920.” The project is named for Mary Eliza Mahona, considered to be the first formally trained Black nurse in the United States and one of the first women who registered in the city, at the age of 76.
From Votebeat Arizona: Arizona pilot for secure ballot paper won’t move forward as planned
From Votebeat Michigan: People leaving prisons in Michigan would get information on how to register to vote under proposed bill
Jessica Huseman is Votebeat’s editorial director and is based in Dallas. Contact Jessica at jhuseman@votebeat.org.
Chalkbeat is a nonprofit news site covering educational change in public schools.
