Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

How the Boomers Transformed Sex

American Sexuality Magazine. Posted March 18, 2008.


Richard Croker, author of the "Boomer Century," discusses the impact of 1960s and '70s sexual rebellion.
Advertisement

Documentary filmmaker, journalist, and author Richard Croker was born in 1946. As a "leading edge" baby boomer, he witnessed pivotal events of the 1960s, including President Kennedy's inauguration and Dr. King's funeral procession.

Some forty years later, Croker reexamines this history in The Boomer Century, a companion to the PBS documentary produced by Joel Westbrook and Neil Steinberg, and hosted by Dr. Ken Dychtwald. The book explores how this generation of seventy-eight million people helped shape society and how it will impact the future.

What was so revolutionary about the "Sexual Revolution"? In writing this book, did you learn something new about it?

In actuality there was no sexual "revolution." There may have been a sexual "rebellion" but no revolution. A revolution is a rebellion that succeeds -- a rebellion is a revolution that fails. Nonetheless, why not rebel about sex? We were, according to popular memory, rebelling against everything else.

The producers of the documentary, for which my book is the companion, interviewed Erica Jong and Eve Ensler about this very topic. Go figure. While Ms. Jong's book, Fear of Flying, may have encouraged sexual experimentation by introducing us to "the zipless fuck" to women who not only enjoyed sex (contrary to popular belief), but reveled in it -- Ms. Ensler lived it, or as she says today, lived through it. She tells us that she feels lucky to have survived. She most certainly would not recommend her lifestyle of the '60s to her granddaughter, but she has no regrets.

In her interview, she told us, "Would I go back and erase those (years)? Not for a second. You know, I'm so happy not only that lived through it, but I survived, because there was a period right after where people didn't survive that kind of lifestyle. So for me, I grew up at that point where everybody just took off their clothes and took off masks and took off taboos and experimented and discovered and that absolutely shaped who I am."

Both ladies agree that if there even was a sexual revolution, it was very short lived. For centuries women had to deal with the triple-edged sword of fear of incurable STDs, fear of pregnancy, and fear of the dreaded "bad girl" reputation, and suddenly in the '60 all of those negative repercussions of unmarried sex were suddenly and absolutely gone. Syphilis and gonorrhea were cured -- the birth control pill was easily available -- and who the hell cared what other people thought anyway? Having sex became like playing tennis. No big deal. That was fun. See you later. But then along came more dreadful STDs and a feminist movement that taught women to respect themselves, and the rebellion was over as quickly as it began.

Unfortunately, there are places where America's children continue the rebellion. I agree with George Will on virtually nothing but respect his journalistic integrity. He recently said on the ABC program This Week, that in the African-American and immigrant communities, seven out of ten children born today are born to single mothers. Seven out of every ten. The prospects for those children are dim. Their mothers were probably born into the same condition and so will be their children. A college education is absolutely out of the question for these kids, and even a high school diploma is highly unlikely. The sexual rebellion in our "at risk" communities must be put down.

How did the mass media -- television, radio -- impact this generation's view of sex?

By the time we leading edge boomers got to college, we had already figured out that the mass media was run by a bunch of big fat liars. I mean we loved the Cleavers, the Andersons, and the Recardos, but we didn't know anyone who lived like that. Our parents surely didn't sleep in separate twin beds. They told us that the Beatles and the Stones were evil. They told us that marijuana would make us want to rape and kill; that marijuana led to hashish and hashish led to LSD and LSD led to heroin and heroin was suicide. Therefore: marijuana leads to suicide. If any part of the media impacted my own personal view of sex, certainly it was Playboy. I may still have a copy or two lying around here someplace. Those girls were my childhood friends.

What do you remember of the women's rights movement? Why do you think young women today, generally, are less interested in feminism?

Bra burnings! I thought that was the greatest thing ever! It might be true that the first bra I ever saw was on fire. But Betty Freidan had every bit as much an impact on American society as did Dr. King. In the '60s in many places, women were not even permitted to sit on juries! The word "peers" was defined as twelve white men. Her book, The Feminine Mystique, had a gigantic effect on our country. Girls no longer attended college questing for the coveted "M R S degree". For the first time, women in huge numbers began to seek advanced degrees with the intent of becoming professionals, of entering the business world -- and staying.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sexuality, the boomer century, baby boomers, sexual revolution

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Very appealing viewpoints
Posted by: letlifein on Mar 18, 2008 4:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with most of your views but also found out how childish we all were at that time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very appealing viewpoints Posted by: wwittman
Actually, Later Children Because Boomers Lied To Us
Posted by: MLO on Mar 26, 2008 9:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost to the last man and woman I know who "waited" to have children is someone who was told to go to school and then have a family.

The boomers lied to us about biology and have done all kinds of things to prevent the truth from being taught. This included putting a kibosh on a campaign to educate young men and women about the fact of the precipitous drop in fertility at 30 and 35.

Most women are starting to get it. Most men don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Extremely dumb piece
Posted by: PerryBrass on Mar 27, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is an extremely dumb, half-witted piece, using, as usual, all the half-wit, self-congratulating, mediorific buzzwords. A good example is the discussion of the Kennedy men's self conscious "masculinity." Yes, Kennedy rushed a Hollywoodized version of the "male mystique" into public view, to cover up his own sexual excesses, and also to cover up his own paranoia about appearing homosexual. He said about his marriage to Jackie, "I didn't want to marry, but if I had not, people would have thought I was queer." That was Kennedy's big fear and he worked overtime to hide it.
The biggest outcome of the Sexual Revolution, and contrary to the idiot opinion in this article, there actually was one, was not having sex, but actually not having to have it; because after enough years of feminism, women actually got the right to say No, without being cast into the role of spinsters, man-hating lesbians, and the usual epithets. Also, non-procreative sex became items you could actually mention in any form of company: masturbation came out of its own closet, for everyone; homosexuality came to be seen as another human sexual variation (just like polygamy, chastity, or monogamy: all human sexual variations), instead of sin, sickness, or "political subversion" (one of American's great bits of political imagination was seeing homosexuality as "Communistic." God! The Kremlin was more homophobic than the Pentagon.)
Unfortunately, sex in America is still in the hands of Madison Avenue, the Church(s), and the public side of the Republican party. But the people have taken some control of it, especially those who are not in the hands of our puppeteers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the author should leave behind his mistaken "one-person feminist movement" and join the rest of us
Posted by: 1234 on Mar 28, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a young woman who did not live through the 60's, but is a product of and a continuation of the Sexual Revolution and the feminist movement, I disagree strongly with the idea that the "rebellion" failed. I benefit every day of my life from the Sexual Revolution. As the previous comment states, from masturbation to homosexuality to choice around sex, to the idea that women LIKE sex and if they don't, then something is WRONG, that women's value is not determined by whether or not they are a virgin, that our bodies belong to US and not our spouses or the government, and on and on and on .....

While we have come a long way the statement that "movements have achieved all they could by changing laws" and that now it's up to individuals is shocking. When one third of American women are raped, when women are dying every day from domestic violence and anorexia, when women still earn .70 to the dollar and still come up against glass ceilings, still constitute the majority of the poor, when the media is just as misogynist as ever and now it's 24/7, when women are being denied access to birth control pills at pharmacies, and the Supreme Court is on the verge of overturning Roe v Wade - how can you possibly say that the movement has achieved all it could? Spoken like a man completely oblivious to the lives of young women today. The reason feminism is less popular today is because the right wing has been on the offense since the 1980's taking away our freedoms, and I hate to break it to you but the "one-person feminist movement" isn't going to cut it. We don't need to be further isolated from each other, we need to join together.

The living proof that the feminist movement of the 60's did not finish the job comes when the author, only moments after congratulating the boomers for erasing the negative stereotypes about promiscuous women, then goes to engage those same stereotypes in talking about immigrant and poor women who have too many children. According to him, it is women's promiscuity, not the fact that college costs thousands of times the minimum wage, that these kids are not able to attend college.

Maybe the author should leave his "one-person feminist movement" and join the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]