Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Sex and Relationships

Unintended Pregnancy Down Among Teens But Up for Young Adults

By Amy DePaul, AlterNet. Posted September 14, 2007.


Why an increasing number of 20-somethings are rolling the dice and getting pregnant.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

News that America's teen pregnancy rate fell 36 percent made for celebratory headlines this year, but a lesser-known finding is that among young adult women, rates of unwanted and unintended pregnancy have actually increased.

"The nation has made extraordinary progress in teen pregnancy, but there's been no corresponding progress among twenty-somethings," says Bill Albert, deputy director of the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

The rate of unwanted pregnancies among women ages 20 to 24 rose by 6 percent from 1994 to 2001, though it declined among teens, according to the National Campaign. Further, 54 percent of unwanted pregnancies occur to women in their twenties, with the largest proportion, 32 percent, among women 20-24.

In complementary findings, the Guttmacher Institute calculated an increase in the rate of unintended pregnancies among women ages 19-35. (The 'unintended' category includes unwanted pregnancies, described as such by the women surveyed, as well as those that are wanted but poorly planned or ill-timed.)

From 1994 to 2001, according to Guttmacher, unintended pregnancies among 25 to 29-year-olds rose from 66 to 71 per 1,000 women. In the same period, unintended pregnancies among 30- to 34-year-olds increased from 38 to 44 per 1,000 women. This trend has given researchers and reproductive health activists cause for concern:

"What you find is one in three pregnancies are unwanted. There's a lot of fertility chaos out there," Albert says. (Both Guttmacher and the National Campaign estimate the majority of unintended and unwanted pregnancies to be among unmarried women.)

The two organizations drew heavily on newly released data from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth, which collected information from more than 17,000 women in 1994 and 2001.

Researchers are trying to find out why adolescents appear to be more capable of controlling their reproductive destinies than young adults. Most experts agree on one fairly obvious explanation: young adults are more likely than teens to be sexually active, though they don't appear to use birth control any more consistently.

The National Campaign has conducted 16 focus groups around the country this year with college- and non-college-educated 20-somethings, some with firsthand experience in pregnancy, and found that while many do not actively pursue pregnancy, they knowingly take their chances through hit-or-miss birth control.

"The question is, why is it that so many young people who say they do not want to get pregnant are rolling the dice?" Albert asks.

Experts are finding that young people's reasons for foregoing a condom or some other measure may have less to do with the urgency of the moment and more to do with their feelings about marriage and child-bearing.

"We are talking to women about why some do and don't use contraception even if they don't want to get pregnant," says Lawrence Finer, director of domestic research at the Guttmacher Institute. "Some people are ambivalent about getting pregnant. They see it as something that happens or doesn't happen, something they have less control over."

Adding to their feelings of helplessness about pregnancy prevention is a casual acceptance of unintended pregnancy. In fact, young people are more alarmed by the prospect of an STD than an unwanted pregnancy, Albert's organization has found.

"It's almost as if pregnancies are not as important," he says, citing some of the statements that surfaced in focus groups, including:

    "Having an STD is so much worse than getting pregnant"
  • "If it [pregnancy] happens, it happens"
  • "It's not going to kill me if I have one"
  • "I'm 28. A baby is not the worst thing that could happen to me."


  • Similar statements emerged in in-depth interviews with 48 unmarried, mostly low-income parents in a study by Paula England, senior scholar at the Council on Contemporary families and a sociology professor at Stanford University. Here is a sample of one 22-year-old woman's reasoning from England's upcoming book, Unmarried Couples with Children:
    "Well, we were planning on getting married, and planning to save for a house, so Myron and I are very committed to each other, so we just were -- I don't know. If we were to get pregnant it wouldn't be a big deal. Or it wouldn't be something unwanted or unplanned. And if we didn't [get pregnant] it wasn't a big deal either."
    In England's study, low-income parents said they had access to birth control and could afford it. Further, they used it properly in the beginning of the relationship, but as the partnership grew more serious, they tended to use it less regularly. One explanation is that some people see the use of condoms, in particular, as a sign of mistrust in the relationship because condoms have come to be associated with disease prevention, according to England.

    Another reason for the increased rate of unintended and unwanted pregnancies is the widening window of opportunity for them to occur: the age of matrimony has risen even as the onset of sexual activity has fallen. The median age of first marriage has risen from 23 to 27 for men and 21 to 26 for women over the last 25 years, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

    Further, there may be more unplanned pregnancies because of because of changing attitudes about births outside marriage, which have skyrocketed since 1970. But there is probably far more to the story, England says.

    "If I had to take a guess, I'd say it's not because single motherhood is more legitimate. It's that shotgun marriage has really changed," England says. "If you go back 40 or 50 years, a fair number of marriages were shotgun. What was really stigmatized wasn't so much being a single mother per se but revealing that you had non-marital sex... The fact that you got pregnant revealed the woman was a fallen woman. I think now that it's not enough to get you the slut label. Therefore that makes people less likely to have to get married over this [unplanned pregnancy]."

    And while social conservatives might argue that marriage has lost its significance among young people, as evidenced by out-if-wedlock births, England disagrees. Research of low-income people's attitudes about marriage shows that declining marriage rates among the poor do not indicate a lack of respect for marriage. If anything, the opposite:

    "Even if you take poor black women where 80 percent of births are outside marriage, marriage is still the norm. If you interview people in these situations, they'll say it's ideal to be married if you have a house and have your economics together," England says.

    "The poor have really internalized the middle class ideal that you have to have your economics together to get married," England says. "They keep finding themselves in these situations where they don't think it's appropriate to be married -- they don't have a house, they can't make ends meet."

    Low-income people deferring matrimony represent "what demographers and sociologists call 'the retreat from marriage'," England says. The term is widely used to describe declining marriage rates across society but is especially concentrated among people living in poverty and men who are not college-educated.

    An ongoing landmark study at Princeton University, "Fragile Families," confirms that unmarried couples with children commonly defer marriage on economic grounds, but it also notes other reasons: the woman's reticence, in particular, based on her concern that her partner is not mature enough or will not be faithful.

    Yet another reason noted in the study is the desire for an elaborate, expensive wedding ceremony, which has become a middle-class norm and a highly celebrated ritual in magazines and on TV. Social conservatives are well aware of the trends in young adult pregnancy. Last year, one Bush official publicly suggested a need to promote abstinence to the 20-29 age group, citing rising pregnancy rates. His idea did not gain widespread support, however.

    Still, the much-derided prospect of an adult abstinence campaign raises some important issues for activists in the field: How do you address adult behavior effectively?

    One effort undertaken by the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy is to correct widespread misunderstandings. First, surveys show that most Americans think the problem of unwanted or unintended pregnancies is mainly a teen issue, and second, that such pregnancies among young adults are not problematic.

    But unwanted pregnancy is often attended by serious consequences to children, whatever the mother's age, including less prenatal care and lower educational achievement, as well as greater familial instability, according to the National Campaign.

    Women in their 20s generally fare better with unwanted pregnancies than teens but not always significantly, and in occasional cases, teen pregnancies actually result in better environments for children because the grandparents are involved and provide support, Albert of the National Campaign says.

    Meanwhile, Guttmacher's research shows that even as unintended pregnancies are on the rise among non-teen women, subsets of that population often experience variations in access, affordability and attitudes relating to reproductive health.

    For example, the rate of unintended pregnancy of Hispanic women who are poor is the highest of all ethnic groups studied, but it is twice the rate of non-poor Hispanic women, a trend mirrored overall. In 2001, poor women had unintended births at five times the rate of their counterparts in the highest income category, according to Guttmacher.

    Further, the rate of unintended births among women living with a partner was more than twice that of married women or of unmarried women not living with a partner. One reason for this statistic might be that adult women living with a boyfriend fail to use birth control consistently out of a desire -- deliberate or unconscious -- to start a family.

    But facile explanations do not always prove reliable when subjected to scrutiny, researcher Paula England has found. In her research, for example, England found little evidence of entrapment on the part of the women.

    She remembers only one woman in her study saying, "He may not have been planning it but I was." More typically, however, the couples followed a pattern of using contraception unreliably, rolling the dice and responding to pregnancy with a mixture of happiness and ambivalence. If anything, she adds, "The men were more likely to be happy about the pregnancy than the women."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: pregnancy, marriage, unwanted pregnancy, unintended births

Amy DePaul is a writer and college instructor who lives in Irvine, Calif. Her articles have appeared in The Washington Post and many other newspapers.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Low marriage rates
Posted by: Freedomrider on Sep 14, 2007 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is nothing mysterious about lower rates of marriage for people with high rates of unemployment and incarceration.

A recent study revealed that in NYC, 49% of black men and 42% of black women are unemployed. Low marriage rates are a natural consequence of that sociological disaster.

Half of all incarcerated people in the country are black. Again, lower rates of marriage are hardly mysterious.

Most people want children and won't deprive themselves even if their circumstances are not ideal. Rising rates of out of wedlock births are the result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Meaningless Data
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 14, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 1994 we were coming out of a recession, at which time people were a bit more responsible about birth control. In 2001 we were heading into a recession. At which point people were a bit less responsible about birth control. What we need to look at is data from 1997 to 2004.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Meaningless Data Posted by: monkeybrig
"Unplanned" vs. "Unwanted" and the issue of Class
Posted by: BenCaxton12 on Sep 14, 2007 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I'm wondering if anyone bothered to survey MARRIED 20-somethings. Are their pregnancies 'wanted' or are they accidental. Is their contraceptive use different or the same as unmarried people of the same age and income.

This article at least, lumps poor and non-poor women in the same age-cohort, and does not examine the role of abortion in who has children and who does not. The high rate of poor women having children unplanned, unwanted, or out-of-wedlock could be telling us something about cultural attitudes of poor women ... or it might be telling us something about non-poor women having better access to early pregnancy testing and abortion services.

From this article, we simply don't know.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What?
Posted by: agirley on Sep 14, 2007 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One reason for this statistic might be that adult women living with a boyfriend fail to use birth control consistently out of a desire -- deliberate or unconscious -- to start a family.

But obviously men can't have that urge. I mean, it's not like men have any responsibility for birth control--it's all the woman's issue!

I was following along right up until that statement.

Peace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What? Posted by: astudent
» RE: What? Posted by: Logic's Edge
Have to ask
Posted by: BlueTigress on Sep 14, 2007 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are these twentysomes the same group that had the higher teen rate?

Groups do not appear and disappear. They age into a differently labeled set.

These are probably also the ones who got either no or minimal sex ed and and a big dose of neocon propaganda about contraceptives don't work anyways.
As regards married pregnancy rates, it's always assumed that marrieds who have children want to do so.

As regards married pregnancy rates, it's assumed that any pregnancy is wanted.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Have to ask Posted by: astudent
» RE: Have to ask Posted by: luzmejor
People age
Posted by: Parlyne on Sep 14, 2007 10:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's not forget that people aged 7 years between those studies. It sounds to me like what's really being seen is that women born between, say, 1978 and 1987 or so (or whatever years better capture this trend) are more likely to have unwanted pregnancies than those born before or after that period, regardless of when you look at the data.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

excatly what I thought
Posted by: kathy-me on Sep 14, 2007 10:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The rate of unwanted pregnancies among women ages 20 to 24 rose by 6 percent from 1994 to 2001, though it declined among teens, according to the National Campaign."

When I read that, it occurrred to me that the same generation of teens with high pregnancy rates in 1994 was the same group of 20-something young women with high pregnancy rates in 2001. Duh.

So the moral of the story is that for a decade we raised kids who cared less about controlling their reproduction.

Just wait until this new wave of faith-based-abstinence-only-educated kids get to be teens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OVERLOOKED, BUT IMPORTANT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 14, 2007 2:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Up until some time in the 60's a woman had maternity benefits only after she had been married for 278 days, the length of a full term pregnancey. Sinlge women were not covered for maternity benfits. So having a child was a financial burden even before the child was born. Once insurance coverage changed, more single women had babies because it was paid for. Even lousy insurance has some maternity benefits. So $$$ was a factor in the change. Also Pregnant women could not get hired. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Also these generations don't want to be 40 and preg for 1st time
Posted by: pitty on Sep 14, 2007 8:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many cases They would rather find a genetically pleasing partner preferably have emotional ties to him and get their kids out of the way pre-30s unlike the gen-xers of the 80s.

Changing attitudes and it is a good thing because it is awful for viagra-laced geriatrics to be having babies with their old swimmers.

Women's eggs age too..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Sep 14, 2007 11:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a shocker I'm going to keep raising until "experts" finally deal with it: 90% of the vaunted "decline in teen births" from 1990 through 2005 was to MARRIED teens (see National Center for Health Statistics). In 1990, 41% of all married teen women gave birth; in 2005, 13%, one of the most staggering declines in fertility ever recorded. THAT'S why "teen births" declined--and no one wants to admit it because no one has any explanation as to why political crusades against "teen pregnancy" (assuming they were effective at all) were 35 times more effective in deterring births among the married teens (average age of mother, 18.5; of father, 22) they didn't target than the unmarried ones they did. Similar trends occurred among adults. The result: despite welfare reform, morals, and policies of the 1990s designed to foster fewer unwed and more marital childbearing, unwed births continued to rise apace (now at record levels) as they have since at least 1920. Why is marriage declining as a venue for having children among all ages despite frantic efforts to shore it up? Answer that one, "experts."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Males Posted by: Logic's Edge
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: pitty
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
...
Posted by: DJ Gee on Sep 17, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I just heard about this on GlobalGrind.com. I'm in my 20s and when I was in school, we spent a huge amount of time talking about STD's and the horrible things that could happen to you if you didn't use a condom. We didn't really talk about getting pregnant though...isn't that something???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement