Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Showtime's 'Californication': Like 'Sex and the City' Except Better

By Greta Christina, Greta Christina's Blog. Posted August 25, 2007.


David Duchovny's new series is smart, funny and, most importantly, it's obviously trying to be true, not just about life in general, but about sex in particular.
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

You'd think I'd be irritated by it.

You'd think that Little Miss Sex-Positive Culture Critic would be foaming at the mouth. Another goddamn pop-culture depiction of promiscuity and casual sex as a sign of immaturity and instability and low self-esteem. You'd think I'd have my boilerplate rant all ready to go.

But I'm not. I don't. I've only seen one episode of Californication so far -- but so far I love it. And I'm dying to see more.

Quick precis, for those who haven't seen it, Californication is a new series on Showtime starring David Duchovny as Hank, a messed-up writer in Los Angeles with writer's block, a divorce he's unhappy about, a whole passel of emotional problems and a good book that got turned into a lousy movie. He has a passive, bemused, almost happy-go-lucky attitude about the life that's going down the toilet ... and he deals with, or doesn't deal with, his despair and fucked-up-edness with casual, wildly promiscuous sex.

Now, I've definitely had a bellyful of the "casual promiscuous sex as sign of emotional problems" trope. I've seen it dozens, maybe even hundreds of times, and a big part of me never wants to see it again.

But I'm cutting Californication a whole lot of slack. It's smart, and it's funny ... and most importantly, it's obviously trying to be true. And it's obviously trying to be true, not just about life in general but about sex in particular.

I was pretty much sold in the first five minutes. I don't think I've ever seen a TV show that featured, in the first five minutes of the first scene of the premiere episode, a conversation about the clit. Where it is, where it isn't, how to find it, what to do about men who can't find it. That sort of thing. (Oh, they probably talked about it on Sex in the City. I'm guessing: I never made it through more than two episodes of that damn show. But Californication makes the glib, smirking fakitude of Sex in the City look like ... well, glib, smirking fakitude. It puts it to shame.)

And I've definitely never seen a TV show with a conversation about the clit that was anywhere near this funny. I love the moment where Hank and the woman he's going down on are about to be caught by her lousy-lover husband, and he says, "Well, maybe I should hide under your clit. He'll never find me there." (And I love even more the scene where he gives the enraged husband a lesson on female sexual anatomy.)

It just gets better from there. I'm tempted to tell you all the good bits, all the funny and freaky and trenchant sexual moments. I'm tempted to describe all the scenes where Hank's sexual passivity, sexual vengefulness and honest desire for sexual pleasure and connection come crashing together in a snarky, detached emotional mosh pit. I'm tempted to describe how he uses both his fame and his self-deprecation about his fame to get women to tumble into bed with him. I'm tempted to describe his defensive unease about his daughter's emerging sexuality, and thus her emergence into a world full of asshole men like him.

But I don't want to spoil it for you. I'll leave it at this so I can move on: This is a TV show that is intelligent about sex, funny about sex, perceptive about sex ... and, as far as I can tell, trying really hard to be true about sex.

Which brings me back to the whole sex-positive thing.

I'm not an idiot. I get that drama requires conflict, and a TV show about a casually promiscuous guy who's overall pretty happy with his life and doesn't have any real problems would make for some profoundly boring drama.

And I'm not an idiot, Part 2: I get that sex is complicated and messy and irrational, and that people don't always handle it very well. As much as I hate the narrow, luridly moralistic vision of sex that pop culture usually hands us, I'm not looking for sex-positive propaganda either.

Of course I'd like to see more genuinely positive images of sex in popular culture. But much more importantly, I'd like to see more sexual truth in popular culture. Sex-positivity isn't about being a cheerleader for sex, all sex, all the time. Sex-positivity is about seeing sex as an essential part of human life: as diverse as the human race, as ecstatic and sad and absurd as the people who are doing it.

And that's exactly what Californication does.

At least in the first episode. I can't wait to see more.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: sex, showtime, david duchovny

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not to be spiteful but
Posted by: michaelt_90046 on Aug 25, 2007 12:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just one thing, they weren't ever married. They do have a kid, just didn't get married. Now that she is getting married to somebody else, he said that they should have been married already.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Not to be spiteful but Posted by: talkville
» excuse me guys Posted by: zipper696
» RE: excuse me guys Posted by: talkville
Californication is Super-Cali-Fragilistic-Expeali-AWFUL!
Posted by: PollyTicks on Aug 25, 2007 3:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CALIFORNICATION is one of the very WORST shows I have EVER seen...and I have seen far too many! The banter is insultingly juvenile and the plotline is tiresome. Sex and the City had some originality; this trumped up blather is shockingly terrible!

I am a huge SHOtime fan and usually love their programming, but this one seems to be targeting idiot men (and women?) between the ages of 17 - 24. This is one show that should be taken off ASAP so that they do not embarrass themselves into oblivion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If David Duchovny's gonna get nekkid,
Posted by: rusty62 on Aug 25, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am SO there! They should give him the Lifetime Totty and Tushy Award for Excellence (and the red Speedos should get Honourable Mention in a Supporting Role) and RETIRE it .

And, oh-by-the-way, the man can ACT.

But his tushy still RULES.

Cheers,

Rusty in San Diego

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bummed
Posted by: ty111 on Aug 25, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That someone would find it necessary to identify themself as

1. Sex positive,

or

2. A culture critic when they are writing about a sitcom

seems sort of sad.

At least we have DD's bum to cheer us up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bummed Posted by: talkville
Drivel. Kind of revealing, though.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 25, 2007 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Front page news? Why don't you just link to some online porn sites as well? I did find this quote amusing, displaying as it does the classical collapse-of-Empire mentality.

"He has a passive, bemused, almost happy-go-lucky attitude about the life that's going down the toilet ... and he deals with, or doesn't deal with, his despair and fucked-up-edness with casual, wildly promiscuous sex."

Followed by "I can't wait to see more".

Yes - that explains a lot of the behavior one sees these days -from Mark Foley's preoccupation with teenage boys, to Bob Allens cruising of Florida bathroom stalls in search of who-knows-what... and I don't even want to speculate about what GW Bush and Condi Rice get up to in private.

Christ, why hold back? Wouldn't 'Friends' have been a better show if it had involved actual porn episodes between the stars? Let's see David Duchovny display it all... why not? Soon, FOX newscasts will be read by topless porn stars...Or is it really true that you can whip yourself up into a greater sexual frenzy in a sexually repressive enviroment - like those Victorian gentlemen who salivated like Pavlov's dogs at the sight of a bare feminine ankle? Or those Islamic fundies who can't bear to stand the sight of even that much flesh without losing their self-control?

Supposedly, there's nothing quite as thrilling as misbehavior - rebelling against sexual repression is oh-so-exciting. Advertisers know this very well... would you like to have sex with our hot new product? It's called transference... and it's also a tactic used by the evangelicals and the religious right, whose endless obssession with sex leads inevitably to spectacles like Ted Haggard's methamphetamine-laced hot-oil sessions with male 'masseuses'.

It's all very artistocratic, isn't it?

Reminds me of that quote by poor old drunken, heroin addicted Jim Morrison: "I'm gonna get my kicks in before the whole sh*thouse goes up in flames" - Quite a fitting epitaph for the Baby Boomer Generation.

I hear Nero fiddling in the distance, amid the noise of the latest Roman orgy. We've outdone the Romans, however - instead of the vomitorium, we've got pills that allow you to eat without digesting your food. In one end and out the other! Party on! Pig it, baby, pig it! Go! Go! Go! Whoo-hooo!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just what the world needs-more
Posted by: SamFox on Aug 25, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
voyeurism. This show is just another "bedroom window" to peep through. Porn has given rise to a new kind of peeping Tom. Now you don't have to leave your house to watch other people having sex.

In my past (60's to mid 80's) porn did me no good at all. Mine was mags like Hustler & Playboy. All I got from porn was an appetite that the pics could only feed for a while. I found myself wanting to do what I was reading about. The sexual stimulation from porn was progressive, needing "just one more view" of the women in the pictorials or reading the letters in Hustler describing sexual acts. Now that the porn is gone my life is much better. Believe it or not, virtue has it's rewards.

I just don't get off on "peeping" into some one else's "window" to watch their sexual activity. I never tried to peep in a window of a real house. Why should I tune my TV to do basically the same thing from my living room?

I watched the 1st episode because I liked David D from the X-files. I was disappointed that he is now trying to be a porn star. A rather shallow one (his character Hank) at that. I had to use the button on my remote (that gives the description of the show being watched) to cover up the nude & sex scenes (I have satellite TV) as I tried to follow the story line. One episode was enough. It is not difficult to guess where the show is headed.

Rome is indeed burning. Hopefully people will quench the fire of lust in their own lives before the whole country goes up it it's flame. Not easy, I know. I fight the battle also.

SamFox

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh?!
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 25, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice review but I don't quite follow.. And that's OK with me. I very much enjoy the show too, but I'm skeptical as to how long the sex-as-problem, man-as-asshole (because he uses sex or engages in it... heaven forbid) rubric can go, story-wise. It seems really limiting to me and I'm intrigued to see if they're able to break that limit or remain within it without going stale. It's like porn in a way... too much of it and you just feel like you've eaten at McDonalds... all bloated and achey, and you desperately want to take a shower and throw-up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

meme
Posted by: shd1230 on Aug 25, 2007 12:37 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
UGH

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: meme Posted by: talkville
Amazing
Posted by: donl51 on Aug 25, 2007 8:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You put so much into a sitcom ,I personally like this show ,don't go ''agog'' over the nudity or faked sex,love the comedy,and i hate sitcoms w/their canned laughter i simply flip the channel, I save all those negative thoughts and direct them toward our political situation!....Americans should view these things like Europeans....they tossed the Puritans out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amazing Posted by: donl51
Didn't Read the Article...
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Aug 25, 2007 10:32 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
don't want to. keep crap like this off of 'Alter-not'. these are diversionary topics to derail what's really going on. while were on the subject, might as well toss out the gossip articles from Huffpost as well. don't care about celebrity adoration. they probably don't either...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good points!
Posted by: dd555 on Aug 26, 2007 12:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like this show, though I don't know that I think it's very well done. The production values and acting, for Showtime, seem a bit cheesy.

On the other hand, there's something fascinating about seeing Duchovny work so hard to play against type. It's like the whole point of his character is: Not Mulder. But he still seems like Mulder, because that character had so much of his own personality in it. Yet now we have Mulder as a drunken, swearing, oversexed, all around messy person. Perhaps this doesn't make it a good show, but it is somehow fascinating.

That said, I think the review's points about portraying sex in a more realistic way (the bad choices, the awkwardness) is something that's not really seen much on TV or in the movies. So I think these points are well taken. If anything, the show is the opposite of voyeuristic, because it makes sex seem so unappealing (more what it would look like if you really stumbled in on two regular people having sex). There's something liberating about trying to peel away the layers of romanticization, gender idealization, and objectification usually applied to sex. So I think the review points out even a not very polished or well written show can have interesting dimensions to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Aspects
Posted by: talkville on Aug 26, 2007 5:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No doubt Californication brings out the aspect of sex and sexual relations, but I've seen not one, but two episodes of the show and it's much, much more than that. Immediate focus on the sexual aspect of the show would be far too limited and in my opinion misses quite a bit more than that. It's set in a very realistic micro-cosmos: California and more specifically L.A. It deals with what LIVING in that micro-cosmos does to people there. Especially telling in the second episode I watched, Duchovny refers specifically to how living in that environment degrades, distorts and literally mangles both men and women in their social relations. He UNKNOWINGLY experiences an affair with what turns out to be a 16 year old friend of his own daughter's (who is also 16); rather than glossing this over, he is currently dealing with this fact once he became aware of it. "Maturity" is in the eye of the beholder! Far more than sex, this is social commentary and very excellently presented in all its manifestations - family life, city life, professional life. It's about our social relations and well worth the time -- especially for "creatives" and the aesthetic crowds that are currently and enthusiastically oppressing all of us through every possible medium. Go Duchovny and I, for one would recommend the show highly (it's even worth seeing 'the sex' in order to LOOK beyond it!). Social micro-cosms have a way of becoming social macro-cosms, and Californication is a great show to bring thinking about this. Who knows? When our social relations are better, perhaps our sexual relations may also be!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Aspects Posted by: monkeybrig
» RE: Aspects Posted by: talkville
How Far We Haven't Cum
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Aug 26, 2007 7:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Clit jokes? Grow up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How Far We Haven't Cum Posted by: zipper696
I just found the show depressing
Posted by: Libsrule on Aug 27, 2007 1:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I watched it. I have noticed David has a similar personality in almost all of his acting gigs. This was no different.

The show was a downer. I don't expect happy happy joy joy shows, but ya know, after a while seeing depressing shows just isn't worth it anymore. This could have been a grunge series for all of it's down attitude.

It's a dark looking show as well.

And the "comedy"?

As black as it gets.

This is the same thing that killed HUFF. Just a downward spiraling show. So what happens if it never stops the downward spiral? Suicide?

Nope, I'm just tired of shows like this.

Not funny, not well written and depressing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexist Rubbish - Enforces Double Standard
Posted by: colleenwhalen on Aug 28, 2007 12:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
O.K. let me get this straight - an emotional invalid who is a middle aged divorced man has non-stop promiscuous mindless sex with women half his age and this is um, ahem ground-breaking, cutting edge "entertainment"?

I am SO fed up with films and television shows which glorify middle aged men who are bed-hopping, cavalier, womanizing emotional invalids.

If it wasn't David Duchovny - a MAN cast in the role - but it was a young woman -or a middle aged woman in the role - she would be branded a slut and marginalized as a
bird-brain. But the author of this article glories and relishes in an "Ain't It Cool" style palaver - just how CUTE it is for promiscuous middle aged men to put women at risk for unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases?

What planet are you on?

The tv show is rubbish and I hope it gets cancelled ASAP. David Duchovney is a wonderful actor and deserves better scripts than this. This program has none of the sophisticated, sparkling wit of "Sex and The City" - this program is just soft porn and a pile of soggy wet mush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is it really that difficult...
Posted by: opeluboy on Aug 28, 2007 6:20 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to find the clitoris? I didn't even know this was some sort of issue. Isn't there only one place it can be? Does it move around? Geez. But then I can find Iraq on a map, too.

I believe I've underestimated how stupid people are. Again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

depends who you ask
Posted by: kkmedia on Sep 1, 2007 12:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
leather and fur is always great leather jackets The essential one-step product for Il migliore Casino Online complete leather care. URAD NEUTRAL buy cigarettes |brings back and revives the original buy diamond earingscolor and is remarkable buy cigarettes online |leather and fur is always great leathers to casino bonus |mint condition. Also, it offers efficient casino and poker no problems, Casino en lĂ­nea casino and poker no problems. Whether used as a simple shoe polish, as a cleaner for golf shoes or as a Best Online Casino Review
das beste internet casino internet casinos ,best casino best online casinos casino spielen blog for all | conditioner for Best Online Casino leather and fur is always greatblog for all |car interior, URAD will surpass Das beste casino | any other product as to ease of use, best online casinos | dry time and leather and fur is always great on leather furniture and saddles, and URAD COLOR to bring a Das beste casino | better shine and hide scuff marks casino and poker no problems.
online Casino bonus | Livonia transmission repair shop Michigan | best online casino bonus usa leather and fur is always great casino links and casino and poker no problems on we also have online casino links and more like cigarette links exchange always great| tamiflu, viagra, cialis buy tamiflu, viagra, buy cialis | pharmacy links | link directory, free link exchange | casinos accepting US players | Il migliore Casino Online leather and fur is always greatjudaica, kotel, menora

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What!!?? HUH??!!! CMON!!! HAVE SOME FUN!!!!
Posted by: Scootja32 on Sep 4, 2007 5:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone seems to call this show pornographic?

I'm assuming that 90+% of people out there claiming this show to be "PORNOGRAPHIC" are either over 55 with outdated old fashion views, or Christians.

I myself (and my girlfriend) watch porn and let me tell you, this show doesn't come even close to some of the sick shit I've seen in my life. If all you blind, naive, party poopers can't see that this is just a well written show cast and directed pretty damn well then you need to watch some REAL porn to desensitise yourselves so you can enjoy a true piece of art.

You can do it but you can't watch it? I don't get it.

Free yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]