Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

I Did Have Sexual Relations With That Woman

By Frank Rich, The New York Times. Posted July 23, 2007.


The indiscretions of former GOP "family values" poster boy Sen. David Vitter are the latest examples of Republican sexual and moral hypocrisy stretching from Congress to the presidential campaigns.
Advertisement

It's not just the resurgence of Al Qaeda that is taking us back full circle to the fateful first summer of the Bush presidency. It's the hot sweat emanating from Washington. Once again the capital is titillated by a scandal featuring a member of Congress, a woman who is not his wife and a rumor of crime. Gary Condit, the former Democratic congressman from California, has passed the torch of below-the-Beltway sleaziness to David Vitter, an incumbent (as of Friday) Republican senator from Louisiana.

Mr. Vitter briefly faced the press to explain his "very serious sin," accompanied by a wife who might double for the former Mrs. Jim McGreevey. He had no choice once snoops hired by the avenging pornographer Larry Flynt unearthed his number in the voluminous phone records of the so-called D.C. Madam, now the subject of a still-young criminal investigation. Newspapers back home also linked the senator to a defunct New Orleans brothel, a charge Mr. Vitter denies. That brothel's former madam, while insisting he had been a client, was one of his few defenders last week. "Just because people visit a whorehouse doesn't make them a bad person," she helpfully told the Baton Rouge paper, The Advocate.

Mr. Vitter is not known for being so forgiving a soul when it comes to others' transgressions. Even more than Mr. Condit, who once co-sponsored a bill calling for the display of the Ten Commandments in public buildings, Mr. Vitter is a holier-than-thou family-values panderer. He recruited his preteen children for speaking roles in his campaign ads and, terrorism notwithstanding, declared that there is no "more important" issue facing America than altering the Constitution to defend marriage.

But hypocrisy is a hardy bipartisan perennial on Capitol Hill, and hardly news. This scandal may leave a more enduring imprint. It comes with a momentous pedigree. Mr. Vitter first went to Washington as a young congressman in 1999, to replace Robert Livingston, the Republican leader who had been anointed to succeed Newt Gingrich as speaker of the House. Mr. Livingston's seat had abruptly become vacant after none other than Mr. Flynt outed him for committing adultery. Since we now know that Mr. Gingrich was also practicing infidelity back then -- while leading the Clinton impeachment crusade, no less -- the Vitter scandal can be seen as the culmination of an inexorable sea change in his party.

And it is President Bush who will be left holding the bag in history. As the new National Intelligence Estimate confirms the failure of the war against Al Qaeda and each day of quagmire signals the failure of the war in Iraq, so the case of the fallen senator from the Big Easy can stand as an epitaph for a third lost war in our 43rd president's legacy: the war against sex.

During the 2000 campaign, Mr. Bush and his running mate made a point of promising to "set an example for our children" and to "uphold the honor and the dignity of the office." They didn't just mean that there would be no more extramarital sex in the White House. As a matter of public policy, abstinence was in; abortion rights, family planning and homosexuality were out. Mr. Bush's Federal Communications Commission stood ready to punish the networks for four-letter words and wardrobe malfunctions. The surgeon general was forbidden to mention condoms or the morning-after pill.

To say that this ambitious program has fared no better than the creation of an Iraqi unity government is an understatement. The sole lasting benchmark to be met in the Bush White House's antisex agenda was the elevation of anti-Roe judges to the federal bench. Otherwise, Sodom and Gomorrah are thrashing the Family Research Council and the Traditional Values Coalition day and night.

The one federal official caught on the D.C. Madam's phone logs ahead of Mr. Vitter, Randall Tobias, was a Bush State Department official whose tasks had included enforcing a prostitution ban on countries receiving AIDS aid. Last month Rupert Murdoch's Fox network succeeded in getting a federal court to throw out the F.C.C.'s "indecency" fines. Polls show unchanging majority support for abortion rights and growing support for legal recognition of same-sex unions exemplified by Mary Cheney's.

Most amazing is the cultural makeover of Mr. Bush's own party. The G.O.P. that began the century in the thrall of Rick Santorum, Bill Frist and George Allen has become the brand of Mark Foley and Mr. Vitter. Not a single Republican heavyweight showed up at Jerry Falwell's funeral. Younger evangelical Christians, who may care more about protecting the environment than policing gay people, are up for political grabs.

Nowhere is this cultural revolution more visible -- or more fun to watch -- than in the G.O.P. campaign for the White House. Forty years late, the party establishment is finally having its own middle-aged version of the summer of love, and it's a trip. The co-chairman of John McCain's campaign in Florida has been charged with trying to solicit gay sex from a plainclothes police officer. Over at YouTube, viewers are flocking to a popular new mock-music video in which "Obama Girl" taunts her rival: "Giuliani Girl, you stop your fussin'/ At least Obama didn't marry his cousin."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sex scandal, gop, david vitter

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
make sex and weed legal
Posted by: richholland on Jul 23, 2007 2:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
since weed and sex are legal in the Netherlands subject to statecontrol and subject to taxation it will hardly endanger a political carreer.
Remember our most popular PIM FORTUYN a bold homosexual; accusted of racisme;
"Me a racist, oh NO last night I slept with a beautifull Maroccan boy, however, this morning my wallet was dossapeared.
If not murderd he was seen as the next PrimeMinister

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: make sex and weed legal Posted by: farhada
» RE: make sex and weed legal Posted by: katyalynn
» RE: make sex and weed legal Posted by: cryptpyrc
Ya know....
Posted by: Sushi on Jul 23, 2007 4:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we are going to have our "leaders" passing judgement and legislation on We the People, I would really prefer that they themselves don't have their own fingers in someones pie or a dick in their mouth while they are doing it. Is that too much to ask? (as in, Mark Foley sponsoring a child molestation bill, Haggart going on about gays, Vitter buying hookers, etc., etc, etc. )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here we go again
Posted by: Cruella on Jul 23, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Acting as though Larry Flynt were a nice guy on our side.

Just because he hates republicans doesn't mean he doesn't hate women too... This is at least the 3rd or 4th article on Alternet that talks about Mr Flynt and fails to mention that he's been publishing material making light of child abuse and sex crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» But,buuuuut Posted by: TruthBeTold
» RE: Here we go again Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Here we go again Posted by: lfranks
» RE: Here we go again Posted by: goldmarx
» RE: Here we go again Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Here we go again Posted by: Markson
Double standard yet again
Posted by: freedom38 on Jul 23, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hmm. Same old story, it seems: Republican "family values" guy is exposed as a filanderer.

Look, I have nothing against nuclear families, so long as they aren't the only option. What I can't stand is a hypocrit telling me that I can't get married to someone of the same gender- and he's out cheating on his wife.

I am sick and tired of this. LGBT rights are not going to cause a mass epidemic of some weird disease. So why the hell can't I get married?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Double standard yet again Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» Families, not THE Family Posted by: Libertine
» RE: Double standard yet again Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: Double standard yet again Posted by: MatthewSavage
Gee whiz, guys...
Posted by: Pirate1 on Jul 23, 2007 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We decendants of Puritan forefathers still actually think all this stuff is important. GET REAL. The guy is a hypocrite... so is almost everyone else in government.

Sex is good for you, folks. We don't have enough of it because we let the tabloids and the talk shows and religious leaders tell us it's bad. Perhaps if the guy in question here had been a little more accepting of himself he might have found a life partner more in keeping with his needs. Poor guy is so messed up now he has to return to infancy to get off.
That's just one of the things all that saying no can do to you.
Doing it and then thinking that all that wonder you just experienced is somehow BAD is even worse. LET GO!
Say yes to sex and ENJOY YOURSELVES and your partners...
That's what it is for, you'll be healthier, happier and less likely to need drugs, or seek violent solutions. Even Bonobos have figured this out, for gawd sake. When tensions arise in the clan the parties involved are offered sex and the situation is diffused. We were once thus until we began listening to crazy people seeking power and claiming to be speaking for gawd telling us that everything that feels good is bad. Confusing us with notions of afterlife we have to be "good" for if we want to attain it. They, of course, decide what good is and as it turns out it always involves working for someone else and denying yourself what feels good... It's a scam, boys and girls and it's been going on for way too long... Have lots of sex, it might just save the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The neocons' “moment in power?” Don't bet it!
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 23, 2007 5:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Frank Rich seems to have written off neoconservatives (best described as “New Nazis”) by ending his article with “Just as the neocons had their moment in power in the Bush era...”

Don’t bet on it. The neocon movement, as epitomized by the rightwing subversive organization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), will not go quietly into the political and social darkness its members have cast over this once sweet land of liberty.

Case at point: Fred Thompson, who may well become the GOP presidential front runner and possible victor in 2008.

Mr. Law & Order is an associate at the neocon front foundation, American Enterprise Institute (AIE). Check its website and you'll find the following PNAC members who either are or were associated with the rightwing orgnization:

John Bolton
Reuel Marc Gerecht, director of PNAC’s Iraq Initiative and former CIA Middle East specialist.
Newt Gingrich
Fred Kagan
Jeane J. Kirkpatrick, PNAC founder.
Joshua Muravchik.
Richard Perle
Danielle Pletka, a 1997 founder of PNAC who claimed on C-SPAN it wasn’t associated with AEI.

In an apparent effort to dismiss itself as a harmless pre-Gulf War 2 artifact, PNAC morphed into pehaps an even more dangerous neocon cabal, the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD).

PNAC, in fact, is an offshoot of CPD which was formed in 1950 to promote anti-Communist actions proposed Paul Nitze and Dean Acheson. Over 30 officials in the Reagan administration were CPD members including the Gipper.

During the Ford presidency, CPD members banded together and founded PNAC, which remained active into 2004. That same year, CPD was reincarnated as Version 2.0.

Because CPD-2 was formed after Gulf War 2 began, its members can deny having advocated Bush’s unjustified invasion of Iraq. Not so with PNAC members, which makes the connection important. The paper trail of signed PNAC letters and reports is like stink on fresh cow dung. The members can’t shake it.

Of 104 CPD-2 members (according to their website), 16 signed PNAC documents:

Midge Decter (PNAC founder)
Steve Forbes (PNAC founder)
Frank Gaffney (PNAC founder)
Norman Podhoretz (PNAC founder)
Ken Adelman
Max M. Kampelman
Clifford May
Edwin Meese
Joshua Muravchik
Mark Palmer
Daniel Pipes
Danielle Pletka
Randy Scheunemann
Stephen J. Solarz
R. James Woolsey
Dov Zakheim

Like rats, most PNAC members have deserted Bush’s sinking Iraq war ship and scurried off to other Beltway neocon nests -- such as CPD -- eager to overturn the U.S. Constitution any way they can. So don't count out the closet traitors just yet.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet and editor of the nonprofit investigative website, King-George.biz, which features the only hardcopy proof of White House corruption ever found on the Internet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Yet again! Posted by: Slmncty