Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Sex and Relationships

AIDS Among U.S. Women Is on the Rise

By Jeff Fleischer, Women's eNews. Posted June 26, 2007.


Reported diagnoses of HIV-AIDS rose 17 percent among U.S. women from 2001 to 2005, and the virus is the the leading cause of death for African American women aged 25 to 34. Here's why and what we can do about it.
Advertisement

In 1989, when a South Carolina hospital offered free tube tying for low-income women, Juanita Williams decided to have the procedure. She didn't know that part of her health screening involved a test for HIV.

"I found out that I was HIV-positive when I was lying on the gurney waiting for surgery," said Williams, a grandmother of three. "The doctor stuck his head in the door and told me they couldn't do the surgery because I had AIDS, and I had to leave the hospital. He pointed my clothes out and pointed to the fire escape. I've been an activist ever since."

Williams was among about 1,000 activists who gathered in Chicago recently for SisterSong's national conference on women of color, sexuality and safety. At a time when HIV and other sexually transmitted infections disproportionately affect African American and Latina women, the gathering stressed the importance of talking openly about sex instead of allowing societal taboos to prevent conversations about risks and safety.

"Everyone is telling us what not to do, but who's telling us what to do?" says Loretta Ross, the national coordinator for Atlanta-based SisterSong, a collective of some 80 organizations focused on reproductive health for women of color. "'Just say no' ain't worked for drugs, sex or politicians."

While men still make up the vast majority of reported HIV-AIDS diagnoses in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that diagnoses of women rose 17 percent from 2001 to 2005, with more than 9,800 women diagnosed for the first time in 2005.

Of U.S. women currently living with the virus, about 64 percent are African Americans, and another 15 percent are Latina. HIV-AIDS remains the leading cause of death for African American women aged 25 to 34, and a top-four cause for black women 35 to 54. It's also the fourth-leading cause of death for Latina women 35 to 44. Younger women remain at higher risk and only cancer and heart disease kill more women annually.

Getting the Info to Women

One of the keys to decreasing those numbers is getting good health-care information to women. Religious institutions often provide opportunities for such outreach, says Kate Ott of the Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice and Healing in Norwalk, Conn.

"You have to go to where people are, and they're in churches, synagogues and mosques," Ott says. "Many religious groups do have a broad social-justice framework, and clergy can be allies. Just because somebody's been ordained to do something doesn't mean they always toe the same denominational line."

She tells organizers to identify with supportive clergy and meet with them one on one, and stresses that local grassroots groups can also take pressure off supportive religious institutions. By providing education and resources around sexual health, birth control or domestic violence, groups can reach churchgoers without religious leaders having to educate from the pulpit.

"There's a myth out there that faith communities don't do sexual and reproductive justice work," Ott says. "Every denomination has progressive members who want to work on these issues."

Last week the nation's largest black religious organization, the Nashville, Tenn.-based National Baptist Convention USA, placed AIDS awareness and prevention on the agenda of its annual congress meeting for the first time, signaling a growing concern over the disease among congregations.

Nearly 75 percent of African American women who contract HIV do so through heterosexual sexual activity, as do about 70 percent of Latina women.

New Options for Prevention

While the federal government continues to focus heavily on abstinence education, Bindiya Gillenwater Patel of the Washington-based Global Campaign for Microbicides, says part of talking about prevention is talking about new options.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sexual health, aids, hiv

Jeff Fleischer is a Chicago-based journalist who has written for publications including Mother Jones, the New Republic, the Sydney Morning Herald, Chicago Magazine and Mental Floss.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Helpful Article But
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 26, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found this article to be very helpful. I had no idea HIV was the leading cause of death among African American women in the 25 age group. I just had two very good reports on AIDS in my classroom. Next time I will share those stats, they are real eyeopeners.

BUT, concervative Christian groups are not the only ones taking a second look at mandatory cervical cancer vaccinations. Many people are uncomfortable with the state making that decision for their daughters. Especially since the cozy relationship with the FDA and BigPharma has hidden many side effects of drugs and vaccinations. It is unfair to present everyone who thinks twice as a right winger or someone uncomfortable with sexuality. I think that the state of Texas requiring this vaccination is a scary testimony to the power of BigPharma on politicians. Maybe it is a prudent thing to do, maybe more research is needed. Let the parents make that decision themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's just part of being..
Posted by: messedup on Jun 26, 2007 10:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's just part of being a mammal; it has nothing to do with promiscuity.

Blame it on the mammals with the reptilian mindsets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Preying on the poor as always
Posted by: Ambrose Pare on Jun 26, 2007 12:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6230580.stm

Kill the poor and stupid. Thats what AIDS is about.
If you ask some of the leading microbiologists what they think of HIV, they will say what virus, never seen it.

AZT is a failed Chemotherapy drug developed in the 60's. Too toxic for humans. Why is it being pushed for treatment of AIDS?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nasookin
Posted by: Nasookin on Jun 26, 2007 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Testing HIV positive means one presumably has been exposed to the AIDs virus. 70 or more different conditions including pregnancy, malnutrition, multiple infections, measles or exposure to a flu shot are known to trigger a false HIV positive.

According to the New England Journal of Medicine, "The techniques of the HIV test have not been standardized, and the magnitude and consequences of inter-laboratory variations have not been measured. Its results require interpretation, and the criteria for the interpretation vary not only from lab to lab, but also from month to month." Because of so many variables the HIV test is seriously flawed and totally invalid.

Health officials seem to be very reluctant to inform individuals targeted for tests the following caveat from HIV test-kit inserts:

* "At present there is no recognized standard for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 antibody in hu man blood." (Abbott Lab HIV Test - ElA)

* "EIA testing cannot be used to diagnose AIDS. The risk of an asymptomatic person with a repeatedly reactive serum developing AIDS or an AIDS-related condition is not known." (Genetic Systems HIV Test - Peptide EIA)

* "The AMPLICOR HIV-1 (PCR "Viral Load") monitor test is not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV infection." (Roche, Amplicor HIV Test Kit).

* "Do not use this kit as the sole basis of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection." (Epitope, Inc. HIV Test - Western Blot)

*Clinical studies continue to clarify and refine the interpretation and medical significance of the presence of antibodies to HIV." (Abbott Laboratories HIV Test – ElA)

Why the disclaimer if these tests are so reliable?

The consequences are that many people are being diagnosed and treated for something they do not have.

Since HIV/AIDs emerged in the early 1980's all known and accepted scientific investigative techniques have failed to prove the existence of a virus. No electron photograph (micrograph) of an isolated HIV particle has ever been published. Virologists have yet to develop a vaccine. Of HIV vaccines alleged to have been developed to date - none are safe for adults or small children according to the United States Food & Drug Administration as reported in the Washington Post, May 6/2007).

Despite causing so many serious medical issues in the course of treatment - including deadly side effects that actually mimic AIDS thereby the treatment creates a self fulfilling prophesy - AIDS drugs don't even claim to work. Every AIDS drug label bears a version of this caveat:

"This drug will not cure your HIV infection. Patients receiving antiretroviral therapy may continue to experience opportunistic infections and other complications of HIV disease. Patients should be advised that the long-term effects are unknown at this time."

So why do people take the drugs? Because they test HIV-positive.

HIV's preference for intravenous drug users, people living in poor neighborhoods, gay white males and Afro/Canadian or Afro/American Blacks of both sexes makes it appear that the HIV virus must be a very selective virus. How is it that this virus distinguishes its victims in such a highly specific way - particularly when it comes to the Blacks of South Africa? Talk about selective science tainted by racism.

By the way, if a HIV vaccine is ever produced that does not injure or kill - how will HIV/AIDS Inc. know it works? By testing HIV positive?

No virus, no vaccine, no Nobel Prize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» DUESBERG??? Posted by: ekipnrut
» Let's say maybe not... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: Nasookin Posted by: jaby
» I agree... Posted by: mjabele
» RE: I agree... Posted by: jaby
» RE: I agree... Posted by: EagleMB
Nasookin
Posted by: Nasookin on Jun 26, 2007 6:00 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alive & Well $50,000 Fact Finder Award

Find One Study, Save Countless Lives

Non-profit Education, Research and Support Network Offers Money in Exchange for Missing Science

http://www.AliveandWell.org
Tel 877-411-AIDS, 818-7801875

Alive & Well will present a cash award of $25,000 to the first person to locate a study that provides us with missing evidence about the accuracy of HIV tests, and in celebration of this important finding, will donate an additional $25,000 to Heifer International, a unique charity working to end
hunger in the developing world using a holistic approach to building sustainable communities.

The missing evidence we're looking for is a study published in a peer reviewed medical journal that shows the validation of any HIV test by the direct isolation of HIV from the fresh, uncultured fluids or tissues of positive testing persons.

Since no HIV test directly detects HIV itself, and since the tests currently used to diagnose HIV infection rely on surrogate markers such as antibodies or genetic material, a study should exist somewhere in the published medical
literature which shows that at least one type of surrogate test for HIV has been validated for accuracy by the direct isolation of HIV itself from people who test antibody, RNA or DNA positive.

The $50,000 offered through Alive & Well will be paid by two anonymous donors committed to the possibility of integrity in AIDS science and to creating a world in which no one goes hungry. Award funds will be disbursed within 30 days of presentation of the required evidence as described above.
For each month the award remains uncollected, Alive & Well founder Christine Maggiore, will make a personal donation to Heifer International....

For the rest of this please visit

http://www.immunity.org.uk/newspage/Alive

or

http://www.AliveandWell.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the virus is the the leading cause of death for African American women aged 25 to 34.
Posted by: Ghoulman on Jun 26, 2007 7:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... are you kidding me?!?!?! Yikes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For those who still think that Science is- BY DEFINITION- always
Posted by: ekipnrut on Jun 27, 2007 9:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
open to debate:


RG


Websites with alternative explanations and solutions for
AIDS
....if the hyperlink doesn't work...just 'exact phrase' Google the foregoing and click that heading (only 2 come up)
Be certain to check out Celia Farber's 2006 Harper's article:
'Out of Control'

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

breeding
Posted by: alevander5 on Jul 15, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]