Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Do Women Enjoy Chocolate More Than Sex?

By Danielle Egan, The Tyee. Posted March 29, 2007.


Author Joan Sewell says so in her new autobiography where she embraces her low libido. The media have hailed her book as "brilliant" but scientific literature disagrees with her theory.
Advertisement

Joan Sewell would rather eat chocolate than have sex according to her new book I'd Rather Eat Chocolate: Learning to Love My Low Libido. The book, hailed as revolutionary and groundbreaking, brave and even brilliant, is an autobiographical cruise through Sewell's attempts to fix her sexual ennui and come to a compromise with Kip, her much hornier hubby who wants sex at least three times a month.

Sewell tries therapy, sexy lingerie and chocolate-based lubes. She tunes into Oprah and reads glossy magazine tutorials and books that support the notion that men and women are from different planets. All to no avail. Eventually Joan and Kip reach a resolution of sorts: sex is a "slog" for her, so Kip will have to make do with the occasional strip show or hand job. She says her much lower libido is "within the normal curve for a woman" due largely to biological gender differences. Yet Sewell ignores a fascinating, growing pile of modern scientific studies disputing the often-repeated stats about a gender libido gap, and the traditional theory that biology drives sexuality, which some researchers claim pathologizes women's sexuality.

The media binge over this slim work of 1950s-style confection is similarly biased towards the superficial sugar-spice model. The Atlantic Monthly dedicated a lot of ink to the topic in its February issue, including an interview with Sewell sporting the headline: "the politically incorrect reality that most married women just aren't that into sex." The National Post also interviewed Sewell, who continued to flog the notion that when women are compared to women, "our libidos are not that low, they are pretty much in a normal range. But are they much lower than men's? Yes."

Writer Dan Savage jumped into the fray with a recent syndicated column, repeating Sewell's claim that women have "naturally lower sex drives" thanks to hormonal and biological differences. "There's no such thing as a woman who wants sex constantly. They don't exist -- never did," writes Savage who cheekily relinquishes heterosexual men from the tyranny of housework, childcare and talking to their partners because "she still won't want to fuck you." The column generated so many letters from women who like sex that he continued the discussion the following week and started a "lusty ladies" link.

Sex on the brain

The debate about how to define healthy or "normal" libido has been heating up over the past decade as doctors, neuroscientists, sociologists, pollsters and pharmaceutical companies gather data, study brains and genitals during orgasm and poll citizens about their lives between the sheets. One often-repeated statistic, based on a 1999 U.S. study, found that approximately 40 per cent of women experience sexual problems. Yet, as some researchers have pointed out, the lead author of the study was a consultant for Pfizer, the makers of Viagra. A more recent Yale study found that almost half of the 56 women studied who had experienced "female sexual dysfunction," (FSD) "had decreased sensation in the clitoris." The researchers underlined "the possibility of a neurological cause for the dysfunction."

It might seem like a no-brainer that decreased genital sensations will adversely affect sexual functioning, but sexuality is a very complex and nuanced thing indeed. Might it not be a huge (profit-driven) leap to say the cause is primarily neurologically based? A group of scientists, doctors and health advocates think so, and have banded together to publish an educational website with a manifesto calling FSD "a new medical myth" and challenging sexual "disease-mongering" promoted in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Disorders (DSM), known as the psychiatric bible.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: sex, women, chocolate

Danielle Egan is a freelance writer living in Vancouver.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
from this woman's point of view
Posted by: bookie on Mar 29, 2007 12:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
sexual desire is a state of mind, but chocolate rules. So why not just have both?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex & Chocolate
Posted by: NoPCZone on Mar 29, 2007 12:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great combination, but if I have to choose...
I'll take great sex over great chocolate any day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I wish it were that simple... Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Great Mystery Posted by: NoPCZone
Just another sign of unhealthy lifestyles and relationships
Posted by: Rune on Mar 29, 2007 12:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's been pretty well established that the frantic and increasingly fearful lifestyles of many middle class men and women are making it tougher for them to find true pleasure in many aspects of their intimate relationships--if they have truly intimate relationships--with any regularity. Moreover, women, more often than men, tend to value their sexual relationships in the context of the entire personal relationship, whereas more men seem able to compartmentalize sexual interaction and enjoy it with people they might not otherwise feel particularly fond or comfortable. Thus, it is sad but not surprising to find throngs of women who have concluded that chocolate, shopping, reading, and other autonomous and transactional activities are a more reliable and stress free means of getting a hit of pleasure than trying to keep a relationship with an intimate partner whole, hot, and healthy. To the extent those relationships are with men, such a result is all the less surprising, given that men tend to be less willing to invest relationship building skills than women--on average (many exceptions on both sides duly noted).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexual Desire Suggests a Human Spirit
Posted by: terradea on Mar 29, 2007 2:47 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Ms. Sewell: Hi there, female sex goddess here. Wow, you sure dumped a load with your book, didn't you? It goes along quite nicely with this whole abstinence thing, and I bet there are a lot of 20-30 somethings feeling relieved that they are final able to admit that sex doesn't do it for them.

I'm not going to comment on the fact that you mention "germy" when talking about sex, or the fact that you criticize women with "seemingly" strong libidos as "pandering to men" or using lust to hide their true desire for security, but I will say this: sexual desire defines the human-ness of people, women and men.

No, it's not okay, Ms. Sewell. You are losing your human-ness. You are becoming a drone, an automaton without a soul. Sex and the love of sex is the path to enlightenment, and you should be searching for your "trigger" instead of rejoicing in your loss.

If society, as a whole, accepts the reduction or elimination of sexual desire as "normal" or "preferable" or even "something which must be controlled," then society is actually working against itself and tumbling into a spiritless clump of working, eating, consuming cogs. Sex and sexual desire are the sparks that keep this human engine running. A quick glance at the proponents of abstinence and sex control (Bush, Dobson, Falwell, Phyllis Schlaffly) reveal arrogant, hateful, anti-human crusaders who think nothing of killing other humans for any "just" cause.

If everyone takes the stance that a low libido is ok, we are doomed. Maybe that's our problem today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

petunia
Posted by: brer on Mar 29, 2007 4:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nearly every page of this book spoke EXACTLY my thoughts. It might not be 50% of women who feel this way, but I can promise you there's at least ONE!

A GREAT BOOK.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: petunia Posted by: rivka_m
» RE: petunia Posted by: RosieRivetor
Rich and shallow
Posted by: rusty5 on Mar 29, 2007 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole notion is in keeping with the American quest for being rich, self-centered, and shallow. The Ann Coulter syndrome. I have to agree with the Female Sex Goddess that Ms. Sewell should be mourning her loss not celebrating it. If the American male would put women on a 'pedestal' instead of objectified lust then perhaps the American female would feel more secure in her sexuality and reward the male with what he seeks.
I would like to suggest that instead of cyberporn for Mr. Sewell that he try a little chocolate on the stick. Perhaps this will induce Ms. Sewell into a feeding frenzy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ich and shallow Posted by: PirateJesus
» RE: ich and shallow Posted by: Eat Politicians
No surprise
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Mar 29, 2007 5:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just another reason not to get married.

Who wants to be trapped in a union with a partner who doesn't enjoy being close to you and doesn't give a crap about your needs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Agree completely Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: Agree completely Posted by: NoPCZone
» RE: Agree completely Posted by: tap17x
» RE: No surprise Posted by: mizkaye
isn't it peculiar?
Posted by: aislinnluv on Mar 29, 2007 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this society has become sex-obsessed yet apparently there are large numbers of people who lack much of a sex drive. no, that isn't normal, unless somehow evolution is returning us to a more primitive state where females are only receptive seasonally, like many other mammals. stress and possibly excess weight may be the culprits in some cases where libido is lower than what we believe should be the norm. i'm a dyed-in-the-wool chocolate craver, but there's nothing wrong with my libido, and given a choice, i could go for a long time without a choc fix if it meant i could have sex. trying to legitimize one's dysfunction by claiming it is the norm for most other women is absurd.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: isn't it peculiar? Posted by: mizkaye
someone is always writing that women have low sex drives, yet Viagra is a top seller
Posted by: Beck on Mar 29, 2007 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although a few hundred years ago, men bemoaned the voracious sexual appetites of women, and wrote how insatiable we are, and how awful life was in general because enough was never enough for females.

I'm sure there are women who don't want any, just like there are men who don't, but the success of Viagra and Cialis makes me doubt that women are the underfunctioning ones.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said. nm Posted by: PirateJesus
I love sex but....give me a massage instead...any day
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Mar 29, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love sex but....give me a massage instead...any day.
I can relieve myself sexually in every way. And most of the time, I enjoy having sex with my man. But when he gives me a massage (which is often) and works out the knots in my stressed-out middle aged aching body...that is love.

Anyone can bump uglies but the man who massages his woman...
now that's even better than chocolate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

1 & 2
Posted by: gjames on Mar 29, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1 - thanks for this great article.
2 - polyamory is the way for me. Share pleasure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who Cares?!?!?
Posted by: nopuppy on Mar 29, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Society is crashing around us, the Constitution has been gutted like a fish by a criminal administration, war, pestilence, famine, tsunamis, the ice caps are melting, the climate of the entire globe is changing in unpredictable ways, overpopulation is destroying any hope for a sustainable future, and people are wasting time and space on sex and chocolate?? GROW UP!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who Cares?!?!? Posted by: mizkaye
» RE: Who Cares?!?!? Posted by: gjames
» RE: Who Cares?!?!? Posted by: xconservative
» RE: Who Cares?!?!? Posted by: tap17x
» true, so true Posted by: veggiegrrrl
Normalcy
Posted by: secretchief on Mar 29, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reading this article made me realize how much women as well as men need to feel they are normal.

I have known women whose sex drive put mine to shame as well as women who could not let go of their self-consciousness, to a point where they had never reached an orgasm.

Why is it so hard to admit that each person is different? If I meet a woman and it turns out she has no libido, I might react in many different ways, but one thing I will never do is try and make her feel abnormal and lacking in any way.

Every man is different, and so is every woman. I refuse to buy into the idea that there is one archetype for men, one for women and that any person who does not fit the archetype should be fixed. I also refuse to put myself in a state of minority by accepting general analyses and applying them directly to my life, or by accepting a universal cure that is not at all tailored to my real situation. People need to act more responsibly and stop exclusively looking up to "authority".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Normalcy Posted by: henderson
» RE: Normalcy Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Normalcy Posted by: secretchief
» RE: Normalcy Posted by: jontv
Come on people...
Posted by: mizkaye on Mar 29, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...get on board with me here. Have we really become so cynical that we can't even enjoy sex and chocolate anymore? Have we been beaten down by the Bushies so much that we have let them steal our very sexual essence and the spirit that goes along with it? Are we that depressed about the state of the world that we allow it to infect our bedrooms like mold? I don't think so...stop setting the bar so high. I am not supermodel beautiful, trust me on this one. My husband is not Brad Pitt...and we are very tired from raising 3 kids and dealing with life. I rant and rail and cry about the state of the world all the time but I REFUSE to allow it to steal all the good things from my life. There is a time for anger and a time for sex and yes, a time for chocolate. We don't have to have perfect bodies and we don't have to stage complicated romance movie sex. Even if it's just a quick 20 minute romp...you have 20 minutes to devote to your partner, surely. If you don't...turn off the evening news and save the email for later. Let's go people...get in those bedrooms and have some SEX!!! And take the damn chocolate with you...we will be much happier...trust me!! ; )

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"She tunes into Oprah..."
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Mar 29, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding!

There's her problem right there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "She tunes into Oprah..." Posted by: morticia
» Shhhhh! Posted by: Rune
On Her Terms
Posted by: Guy on Mar 29, 2007 8:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, it seems like she's got it all worked out and Sewell and her husband have come to some workable arrangement, on her terms at least. I wonder how she will feel when her husband gets tired of beating off and the ocassional sexual favor "on her terms" and he starts looking elsewhere for real sexual satisfaction with another person.

I think her approach is very self-centered and selfish and if I were her husband, I'd be embarrassed as hell that she put this all out in public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On Her Terms Posted by: MartianBachelor
» RE: On Her Terms Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: On Her Terms Posted by: mviscid
» RE: Agreed Posted by: tlCampbell
» RE: Agreed Posted by: Guy
» RE: On Her Terms Posted by: jontv
» RE: On Her Terms Posted by: charlieparisek
The Government's response is obvious ...
Posted by: just john on Mar 29, 2007 8:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OUTLAW CHOCOLATE!

I figure there are big bucks to be had with an ad campaign similar to the anti-tobacco ads*, leading to a total ban and vigorous ban-enforcement strategies.

OUTLAW CHOCOLATE! BUILD MORE PRISONS! MAKE MORE MONEY!



(* Yeah, I think tobacco is more harmful than chocolate.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Free your crotch and your mind will follow
Posted by: mviscid on Mar 29, 2007 9:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Badass comments, y'all! Lovin' it.

Years ago I joined a punkrawk feminist message board for young women. First thread I visited was about sex (just that kind of gal :D). OMG! Every other post was about the poster's sexless marriage/LTR. Interspersed among those were other posts telling her, "oh yes honey, you're completely right and NORMAL for not wanting to screw your mate. People act like sex is normal but it's really not." !!! Surreal, y'all. It came out later - many of these women had been assaulted or abused earlier in life. But not all.

I think it sucks to live without passion and sex but I think it sick, the bad sick, to rationalize that dispassion is the human norm. Me, my sex drive figures big in my well-being. Even if I have to hunger a few days til relations, the very experience of lust is life-affirming. Fire in the belly. Steam in my stride. Hello world, I'm your wild grrl!

Whew. Springtime, y'all. Ahem.

But I think it takes all kinds. And we've a shortage of intimate, lovin', lusty kinds. I think our society's 'go it alone, by yer own boostraps' excuse for not caring for each other--it doesn't help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Sex beats eventhe best chocolate
Posted by: RedJuly on Mar 29, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help thinking that the author has never been fortunate enough to experience great, pleasurable sex. Sadly a lot of women never learn what is enjoyable to them and do not have a partner who has taken the time to find what is pleasurable. The answer isn't in a pill bottle or a book. It is a matter of being comfortable with yourself, being able to relax with your partner, and experimenting to discover what turns each other on. Perhaps if women felt comfortable enough to touch themselves they could relay what they like to their partners (male or female). Some woman enjoy clitoral stimulation and others vaginal, etc. And technique matters! There is more to great sex than inserting a penis or licking the clitoris. it's a lot about HOW it is done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Discouraging
Posted by: billjv on Mar 29, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this woman's book is discouraging. It basically gives a laundry list of things she (half-heartedly) tried to improve her sex life, and then finally ends up coming to a conclusion that she just doesn't really care and that it's not her problem that she doesn't. This gives women in the same situation an excuse to wave this book in their husband's/other's face and give up trying as well. That is truly sad. I wonder how many breakups will occur from women adopting this attitude. She strikes me as being self-absorbed and not willing to accept that she (and not most or all women) has the problem, wanting to feel that most women concur with her conclusions. I don't believe that is true, and I don't think a majority of women would either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Discouraging Posted by: Guy
At least men in the U.S. still prefer sex
Posted by: ateo on Mar 29, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read somewhere that over 50% of British men prefer a good meal to sex. Something approaching 50% of American women prefer a good night's sleep to sex.

Only something like 30% of American men claimed to prefer virtually anything over sex.

So, score one for the Americans!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

her way or the highway
Posted by: athamandia on Mar 29, 2007 10:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Agree that Sewell gets her husband to have sex on her terms (hand jobs and a strip show?!?). I wonder why we link marriage to sex. Marriage is a partnership built around raising children and money. Yeah, we go into it for love, but for MANY people after 20 years the love is gone and only the partnership remains. Why do we then insist that the partners remain sexually monogamous with each other? My ex-husband completely lost desire for sex, while I wanted it. I stayed in that horrible sexless marriage too long for the kids. Now I have a married lover because his wife hates sex but they are tied economically.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: her way or the highway Posted by: aussidawg
More garbage and Dribble!
Posted by: Jharyn on Mar 29, 2007 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish people, who think like this woman and anyone who agrees with her would just keep to themselves. Start a club so all the unhappy idiots with their ridiculous theories can keep it to themselves.
Embrace your sexuality! Stop listening to these unhappy fools who have allowed themselves to become robots instead of human beings.
Chocolate over sex? Go ahead honey. Enjoy your lonely piece of chocolate.
Only someone from the USA could come up with this crap!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sex and the aging woman
Posted by: lindalee on Mar 29, 2007 10:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women are all different. Period. My husband had his prostate removed in 2001, about 6 months before we were married. I married him knowing that he may never function the same way. And we had a fabulous, hearty sex life before his cancer was diagnosed. We still have fun and he's very lucky to have some function all these years. Now that I'm in the throes of perimenopause, my libido has crashed a little. Sex is still fabulous - I just don't want it every other day like I used to. Just as I adjusted to his functioning differently, now he has to do the same. We didn't commit to each other because of sex, we committed because of love.
My older sisters, in the same boat as myself, are the complete opposite.
Although I may not agree with this woman completely (nor do I have the need to read the book), at least she's making some women feel better that they aren't in the mood or don't like certain things. Although I don't see how disliking oral sex is possible, there are plenty of women who don't like it but enjoy everything else about sex.
I'll say it again, women are all different. and we can't know what's in store as we age.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men Need Sex to Feel Loved
Posted by: Russ Wellen on Mar 29, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's the rub (or lack of it, as the case may be). Okay if a woman wants to give up on sex, especially as she ages. But be aware the man can't help feeling he's being rejected.

Worse than being rejected is when a woman consents to making love, but is so perfunctory about it the man thinks he's raping her.

He soon stops approaching her because:
1. He doesn't want to be rejected and feel like he's unloved.
2. He doesn't want to feel like he's raping her.

It's better to stop approaching her for sex. Then he can:
a. Cling to the illusion that some wisps of love remain.
b. Feel self-respect about not coercing her.

What's the answer then? I mean something beyond porn. A mistress system like in France or something?

Anybody have any ideas?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Men Need Sex to Feel Loved Posted by: morticia
» Pretty Good Answer Posted by: Russ Wellen
» RE: Pretty Good Answer Posted by: morticia
» RE: Pretty Good Answer Posted by: PirateJesus
» FUCK A DUCK... Posted by: charlieparisek
a culture of multiple selves
Posted by: Blue Heron on Mar 29, 2007 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I do think there may be some value in studying the differences between men and women, I think these same studies tend to cause a disconnect in our thought process. Why such a black and white, analog mentality? Any philosophy that tells me what I should be thinking or feeling, whether backed up by scientific reearch or not, is just annoying. Human beings are very complex, and are affected by more factors than a preference for sex or chocolate. And we also have brains by the way. Hormones are powerful of course, but where is the bit about our literature or philosophy preferences? Are those not sexy? Talk about bimbo culture... I'll be back once I stop hurling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex is spiritual to SOME people, like everything else under the sun
Posted by: davelwhite on Mar 29, 2007 11:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wish that someone would do an article about low libido that didn't give off a huge odor of smugness-- and this applies both to Sewell's book, as described in this review, and to the review itself. (I'm not sure if Alternet's author is actually of the opinion that everyone has to prefer sex to chocolate to be healthy-- but if her point in the review was that "low libido deserves to be discussed but Sewell does a bad job of it," that point was none too clear.) Neither author appears able to discern or express the possibility of a broad range of human sexual interest on the part of both sexes, including low libido.

If Alternet's author is interested in understanding this range of diversity, I would suggest for her to interview the founder of www.asexuality.org, David Jay. He can fill her in on how some people are questioning the DSM's fixation on "you have to have a moderate to high libido to be normal" from a left-wing, even queer-radical perspective. He can also fill her in on the gender breakup of the thousands of members of his site: roughly fifty-fifty. Hmmm.

Alternet's author and some posters have touched on spiritual aspects (one of them referring to Sewell as "having no soul"). Is sexuality spritual? Why do we have trouble answering this with "it can be"? Receiving Eucharist can be spiritual-- but only if you're Christian, typically. Dancing naked around a bonfire on Midsummer's Eve can too-- if you're Wiccan. Sexuality is one way to express emotional and spiritual connection to another person. It is not the only way. In particular, history and anthropology reveal a variety of intense nonsexual relationships in other cultures, frequently celebrated with explicit religious ceremony. So the currently-very-popular belief that sex is special somehow, is not scientific, just a very popular faith-based belief.

Too many people—including not only right-wingers with their Sacred Institution of Marriage but also left-wingers with their notions of sacred sexuality—view their attitudes about sexuality the way Evangelicals view religion, namely: “my way is the one true way.” Like Evangelicals who want to “bring Catholics to Christ,” they are tone-deaf to the fact that the people who are not practicing their form of sacred connection to other humans are probably practicing other forms instead. And like Puritans who dismiss the faiths of Native Americans as superstition, they are missing out on spiritual connections themselves, although they are loath to admit it.

Those people in conventional sexual relationships who are the most supportive of low-libido people tend to share with us a bit of the spiritual experience of connection that you can have with close friends that doesn’t depend on gender or sexuality or orientation; meanwhile, those who dismiss us tend to be the ones who have rigid notions about friendship being incomparably less significant than romance, who drift apart from friends after marriage, who always say “let’s have lunch” but never do it. They withhold emotionally from friends too. No wonder they don’t experience or understand spiritual connections that aren’t dependent on gender or sex! Meanwhile, for those of us who have had a really intense spiritual experience of connection in a nonsexual relationship, having sex, especially under all the pressure of these sexual fundamentalists who insist it’s some sort of requirement for mental health, starts to feel like being forced to attend someone else’s church: everything that has had sacred meaning for you is dismissed, while other people’s sacred is constantly being shoved down your throat. Without this attitude, I would like sex more than I do now, although, to be honest, a backrub or sharing a bit of chocolate with my best friend would still take precedence.

Dave

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's not just a sexual crisis
Posted by: pbutler on Mar 29, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Americans were both the least likely to associate food with pleasure and the least likely to think their diets were healthy.

Yet we in the US continue to buy more and more of our meals from worse and worse fast-food joints, "instant-meal" manufacturers, etc.

Our physical environment is deteriorating, our relationships are ever-more shallow and strained, our cities are noisy stress factories, our clothing is uncomfortable, our entertainment is awful, our social structures are warped and increasingly antagonistic, our schools...[shudder]...

Let's face it, folks: turning our culture over to the corporations and our communications to advertising has been a complete failure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"gender egalitarian cultures"
Posted by: dwatkins9 on Mar 29, 2007 11:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps that phrase "gender egalitarian cultures" holds the key to understanding this phenomenon. Maybe women don't really like unmanly, egalitarian, "sensitive new-age males" all that much. Maybe they like a little machismo, as found among, I don't know, the Spanish or the Portugeuse. Just a thought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's an IDEA...
Posted by: Wassermann on Mar 29, 2007 3:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Use chocolate syrup (preferably warm/hot) DURING sex and foreplay!

Trust me: various body parts smeared or covered with chocolate syrup taste EVEN BETTER. And after a while the added stickiness of all the dried or drying chocolate makes the sex even hotter!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexual desire can be cyclical...
Posted by: form516 on Mar 29, 2007 5:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How old is the lady that wrote that book?
I had a horrendous peri-menopausal period that lasted quite some time, I thought that I would never want sex again. It was like that asexual period pre-teens have. I had no use for it. But about a year and a half ago my symptoms started clearing out and boy am I ever glad I did not have it sewn up or something! ( Believe me, I hated the idea of sex so much for awhile that I was capable of anything!)

Well, I'm financially secure so, I guess I can't explain the fact that I have been able to really enjoy my sexuality- now that I'm "over the hill" I'm loving it.

But when you think about it, a lot of human characteristics ebb and flow like that...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HAND JOBS FOR KIP
Posted by: charlieparisek on Mar 29, 2007 6:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I imagine it won't be long before poor Kip tires of his wife's hand jobs and strip tease acts (both probably lame) before moving on to a relationship with a more compatible woman.

It is one thing to be an understanding husband. It is an entirely different matter to supress a huge part of one's being to a selfish and self-centered partner; especially so when that partner chooses to go hugely public with marital details that most couples would find embarrassing.

At the very least Kip should find himself a suitable sex partner outside of the marriage. Any feelings of guilt could be salved with a nice box of Godiva.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: HAND JOBS FOR KIP Posted by: Guy
I have to wonder...
Posted by: Logic's Edge on Mar 29, 2007 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
how things would be if the "personal vibrator", now available in many forms, had never been invented.

Did its inventor (a man, no doubt) curse his brethren or bless womankind?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sewell's hubby.............
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 29, 2007 9:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
............needs to get a girlfriend. If he could avoid falling in love with her, his wife should be grateful that he stays with the wife and keeps fucking the girlfriend instead of running off with the first woman who will have him. Ideally the girlfriend is married too. There are dangers here, obviously, but there are probably more serious dangers in the present situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex vs. chocolate
Posted by: morticia on Mar 29, 2007 9:26 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think Sewell prefers baloney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sewell may have answered this,..
Posted by: tap17x on Mar 29, 2007 9:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..........but I didn't read the whole thing, seeing that her book and the article about it was depressing. (I would never get close to an asexual woman.) BUT - is she on HRT? If not, she should try it, even with an increase in certain health risks. It may boil down to HRT and marriage or neither.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Men are like chocolate....
Posted by: Sherry M. on Mar 29, 2007 10:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...If you can't have the best, don't bother.

Why doesn't this article mention the importance of foreplay for women? I'll bet more than half our libido problems would be solved if more men weren't so clueless, or careless, about foreplay. Gratitude certainly does enhance MY libido.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Men are like chocolate.... Posted by: Logic's Edge
» Or better yet... Posted by: xconservative
The big question
Posted by: peterb on Mar 31, 2007 11:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for me after reading the article was "why on earth is Kip putting up with such a self centered ego centric robot?" maybe by now he saw the light

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The big question Posted by: Guy
» RE: The big question Posted by: morticia