Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

Is Three Wives a Crowd?

By Kara Jesella, AlterNet. Posted March 10, 2006.


HBO's latest Sunday night series, 'Big Love,' centers on a family of Utah polygamists. Will mainstream America be able to relate?
biglove_poster_s01_283x236
HBO 'Big Love'
Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

"Can he have sex with both of them at the same time?"

That's what my boyfriend asked midway through a screening of "Big Love," HBO's new drama about a polygamist family (the first episode premieres this Sunday, March 17, after "The Sopranos").

I'm not sure whether patriarch Bill Henrickson (Bill Paxton) can have multiple-partner rendezvous with his three wives, Barb (played by Jeanne Tripplehorn), Nicki (Chloe Sevigny), and Margene (Ginnifer Goodwin), but based on the first episode, it looks like he doesn't. Except for the fact that he sleeps with a different woman every night, Bill seems as vanilla as can be.

Still, I don't think my boyfriend's question was just wishful thinking. Polygamy is pretty confusing to most monogamists. It seems like the creation of a bunch of sexist, scheming Utah Bible-thumpers who use the "word of the lord" as an excuse to keep harems of women at their beck and call as sexual playthings. Right?

Well, not exactly. Beyond the star-studded (but not overexposed) cast -- which also includes Harry Dean Stanton, Tina Majorino (the nerdy girl in "Napoleon Dynamite"), and Amanda Seyfried (one of the Plastics in "Mean Girls") -- and the fact that I'm riveted by most any show on HBO, the reason I wanted to see "Big Love" was because it promised a new twist on an old stereotype. According to the press release, the program tells the story of Bill's "balancing the needs of his three wives" -- a statement that gave me pause. You mean, Bill is concerned about their needs? How nice of him! (So, polygamy isn't just about what men want?)

In fact, the arrangement is stressful for everyone. This is made clear in the show's opening scene, in which Bill's bedroom encounter with Nicki ends in complete sexual frustration for both. This clearly isn't the first time -- and it won't be the last -- that Bill can't please his wives. As he moves from one house to the next (the women live next door to one another, and they switch off days with Bill), he disappoints each, in turn. And they are really, really disappointed. "Are you going to wear your pajamas to bed every night, or just on mine?" asks Barb. Margene cries; Nicki nags. Bill, our older, stressed-out, almost-every-husband hero, finally turns to Viagra.

HBO has become the go-to channel for family dramas that spotlight "alternative" relationships. At their best, the shows tell us something about all of our relationships. For instance, in "Entourage," a group of heterosexual, homosocial good-time guys live together in a uniquely 21st century arrangement -- what author Ethan Watters called an "urban tribe." And "Big Love" airs right after "the Sopranos," the drama about extended families that somehow doesn't feel far from our own experiences -- the adultery and divorces -- even if it is about mobsters.

So it makes sense that HBO wanted to give the same treatment to polygamy, a multiple-partner familial arrangement that, while rare (the Mormon Church banned it more than 100 years ago, but there are still anywhere from 20,000 to 40,000 practitioners in the United States), has an outlaw ethos that is common in plenty of other experimental American couplings, from gay marriage to open relationships.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

Kara Jesella is a freelance writer in New York City. She is currently co-writing a book on Sassy magazine for Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bill and the Culture
Posted by: sisterbluerose on Mar 10, 2006 1:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill resorting to Viagra when he could have made love like a lesbian shows some blind spots in our culture.
The federal law against polygamy was passed in the 1880's as a religious law, thus violating the first amendment. Of course, the supreme court has never agreed.
Now that we have Church of all Worlds Nests with multiple Husbands and and Wives. And Dianic Affinity Groups with just Wives, maybe the culture will change.
Although truefully monogamy is easier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bill and the Culture Posted by: adp3d
» RE: Bill and the Culture Posted by: kpetin
Not your Grandfather's Polyfidelity movement
Posted by: AdamSelene40 on Mar 10, 2006 10:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perspective: at the moment this is the FOURTH comment on this thread, as compared to EIGHTY SEVEN for the "Christian Atheist".

So, that ought to be an indication how compelling the polygamy/group marriage/nesting/BFICs, etc. etc. topic is to a more or less educated, affluent and broad minded audience.

Personally, I would have liked this one to have been set in the Oneida Community during the lifetime of John Humphry Noyes so the clash of cultures would be engaged on more or less equal terms-- but then BIG LOVE would have had a budget like ROME and an audience like CHAMPIONSHIP BILLIARDS.

Just remember: when filmmakers got their hands on Heinlein's STRANGER IN A STRANGE LAND the rights were passed from hand to hand for years and years ... and it finally came out as "The Man Who Fell to Earth" ... retaining a "Man from Mars" in the role of Innocent Sauvage -- and nothing else.

And, oh yeah -- Dr Flox in ENTERPRISE came from a culture with a polyfidelitous marriage system.

But once you get past the 'can he have both at once' joke ... most of us ain't that interested.

Too bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Were you kidding? Posted by: HeidiLockwood
I'm still gonna check out the show, but...
Posted by: kmeyer on Mar 10, 2006 12:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The polygamist bent in Mormon history is not to be lightly updated through a humanist lens. It is based on ownership, radical male dominance and in many cases pedophilia. Mainstream Mormons may have successfully distanced itself from it, but the themes involved continue to pervade Mormon culture.
Fact is, Joseph Smith tried and failed to sneak polygamy through the back door into the churches' ethos, and rumors of his taste for young girls was a factor in his murder. Brigham Young pretty much kept the idea under wraps while the church migrated from Nauvoo to SLC, unveiling the new tenet when the church members were isolated in disputed territory (the Mexican American war was still underway). In this environment, it became more firmly entrenched than it would have otherwise, and the Mormons gave it up only under extreme duress.
I don't know if I can buy into the idea of the show, but if any network can do it, its HBO.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The marriage trap
Posted by: Moonray on Mar 10, 2006 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marriage is a useless and destructive institution, largely a means through which women ensnare men emotionally, socially and -- most important -- legally.

Men should know better by now, but each year millions of them trudge to the altar, and most are quickly fleeced and slaughtered. The only ones who benefit are the wives and, mostly, the lawyers.

Marriage should be abolished. The entire concept -- that the state must give permission for our relationships and living arrangements -- is ridiculously outmoded. The sooner we scrap marriage and require men and women to take equal responsibility for their lives and offspring, the better off we will be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The marriage trap Posted by: Paul D
Polygamy is not a laughing matter
Posted by: bookwoman on Mar 10, 2006 1:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few months ago, a national tv show revealed the situation in a polygamous town just over the border from Utah. These people were tacit Mormons but had been sanctioned by that church as outlaws. Still they flourished. There were multiple households with one man, several "wives" and a bazillion children. There was the marrying off of extremely young (12 years old) to much older men with the attendant difficult births. However, these people had their universe so tied up that attempts to rescue the children involved in these households failed. The law enforcement people, the members of the municipal government and even the judge were all members of the community so that they weren't about to enforce warrants from any level of government. I heard the other day that the "judge" who was the leader of the community has been removed from office and been indicted for several crimes. The children are in protective custody.

Polygamy may seem "cute" and these woman in the HBO production may be seen as acquiesing to this style of living, but the truth is, as noted, that in the real world, this is a form of female servitude where women have no say as to their way of living. If they speak out they are punished and then ostracized by the community.

HBO has such a wonderful record of creating great production. However, the idea for this show based on polygamy reminds me of the idea from the film" The Fisher King" where a tv producer wants to make a show about "happy homeless people". There are just development ideas which should have been left on the development room floor; this program on polygamy is one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A good book
Posted by: Paul D on Mar 11, 2006 12:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Under the Banner of Heaven" by Jon Krakauer

An excellent telling of the history of Joseph Smith, mormonism, polygamy, and violence in the Church's name.

Not exactly a "balanced" book, but riveting nonetheless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lest there be any misunderstanding . . .
Posted by: hthalljr on Mar 12, 2006 9:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Kudos to Kara Jesella for pointing out that Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints abandoned the practice of polygamy more than a century ago.

(The practice of one man having multiple wives is more correctly referred to as polygyny).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny

It should also be understood that there can be no such thing as a "Mormon polygamist," because a "Mormon" is a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (See the Associated Press Style Guide.)

To eliminate any further misunderstandings, I would encourage all to read the official response of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints to this series, which concludes with the statement:

"For that reason and others, Church leaders have consistently cautioned against such entertainment, joining with other religious, education and government leaders in inviting individuals and families to follow a higher road of decency, self-discipline and integrity."

http://tinyurl.com/qo7d2 (short alias to long URL at lds.org).

Tracy Hall
hthalljr'gmail'com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Big Love" gets it dead wrong.
Posted by: Caroline D. on Mar 21, 2006 10:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Big Love" is to modern Utah polygamy what "Hogan's Heroes" is to World War II.

In Jon Krakauer’s book, "Under the Banner of Heaven," he cites polygamous wives in Colorado City, AZ-UT (dubbed "Juniper Creek" in the TV series) who insist that pedophilia is rampant within the community. Did Big Love’s producers fail to read Krakauer's book or did they simply choose to ignore it?

I was worried that Big Love might glamorize Utah polygamy and gloss over the misery it creates for women and children. So far I'm relieved that Big Love’s entertainment value is on a par with Hogan's Heroes… At least for females trapped in organized polygamy by means up to and including death threats. With any luck HBO will cancel the series before it makes the “shenanigans” of Colorado City seem as routine and amusing as the Mafia's drug-peddling and blood-letting.

I can already hear many of you saying, hey Caroline, lighten up. It’s only a TV show. Well, girls, picture yourself at age fourteen, being “awarded” (by "Roman Grant") to a fifty-year old man as his fourth or fifth wife. Then picture your fifty-year old “husband” molesting your eleven-year old sister on a regular basis. Your mother knows it’s going on, the community knows it ’s going on, and Roman Grant most definitely knows it’s going on.

That’s the day to day reality upon which Big Love’s premise is based.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]