Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sex and Relationships

'Prayer Warriors' Battle to Pass Gay Marriage Bans

By John Ireland, In These Times. Posted October 10, 2008.


And they have more money and support than you think.
Advertisement

If the Religious Right seemed suspiciously quiet recently in the fight against same-sex marriage -- get ready for a battle royale.

Conservative groups like Focus on the Family and the American Family Association put up a relatively weak fight when Massachusetts established same-sex marriage rights. Even San Francisco's attempt at marriage equality in 2004 yielded mostly tame and disjointed protests.

But now that the California Supreme Court has ruled that barring same-sex couples from marriage is unconstitutional, the Religious Right's top brass is galvanizing its funding base. It has reportedly summoned vast armies of "prayer warriors" to win the battle once and for all.

Groups from across the country are spearheading efforts in Arizona, California and Florida to amend those state constitutions to permanently restrict civil marriage to opposite-sex couples.

California's Proposition 8 -- a referendum on November's ballot -- would add the following language to its state constitution: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." A Field Poll released in July found that, by a 51 percent-to-42 percent margin, California voters opposed the proposition, with the greatest opposition coming from voters under 30.8.*

Arizona's Proposition 102 states, "Only a union of one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this state." A February poll taken by Arizona State University's Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication found that 49 percent of residents would vote in favor of a marriage amendment if it didn't affect domestic partner benefits. Residents who said they'd vote against it accounted for 40 percent, while 11 percent said they were undecided. A majority vote is needed to approve the measure.

Meanwhile, Florida's Amendment 2 would insert the following language: "Inasmuch as marriage is the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife, no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized." A June 3 Quinnipiac University poll found that 58 percent of Florida voters would support the proposition while 37 percent would oppose it. The amendment needs the approval of 60 percent of voters to become part of the state constitution.

A Conference Call to Arms

The Religious Right is using these last months leading up to the election to amplify the debate nationally.

On his Aug. 1 broadcast of "Washington Watch" radio show, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins described California as a "springboard for the rest of the nation." He said: "If California goes forward with same-sex marriage, mark my word, we will begin to see this march across the country. ... Don't think you are protected because your state has a state marriage amendment, those will be challenged in federal court under the federal constitution. ... It is vitally important that we help California['s Proposition 8] succeed."

Two days earlier, on July 30, a who's who of the national Religious Right leadership convened a conference call of more than 200 pastors in Arizona, California and Florida to lay out the strategy leading to the Nov. 4 election.

Hosted by pastor Jim Garlow of Skyline Church in San Diego, participants on the call included Perkins, Harry Jackson, senior pastor of the evangelical Hope Christian Church in Washington, D.C., and Maggie Gallagher, president of the Virginia-based Institute for Marriage and Public Policy -- the principal organizer behind California's Proposition 8.

Also on the call was Chuck Colson, founder of Prison Fellowship Ministries, who called the battle over marriage equality, "the Armageddon of the culture war." Over the past few decades, Colson has become an evangelical Christian powerbroker and, more recently, a well-known organizer in the fight to oppose marriage rights for same-sex couples.

Leaders on the July 30 conference call asked pastors to spare no effort in the fight to pass the traditional marriage initiatives on the Arizona, California and Florida ballots and to reverse the gains of marriage equality advocates. Their exhortations met with a passionate response.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: religious right, same-sex marriage, proposition 8

John Ireland covers progressive politics and social dynamics in the United States, exploring "democracy in action." He has been published in numerous periodicals, including Newsweek, the San Francisco Chronicle, the Baltimore Sun and the Advocate.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Sex and Relationships! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
"Prayer WARriors"
Posted by: rg on Oct 10, 2008 6:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess these WARriors are too busy to turn their attention to the fact that millions of people all over the world are dying of disease, starvation, and thirst. AND, that heterosexual divorce is rampant.
Bullshit Warriors, each and every one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They better pray harder.
Posted by: IndyCA on Oct 10, 2008 9:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Opposition of this measure is 50-55% and there are 10% that don't really care. So you are talking about less than 40% support for this proposition. It also does not help them that the under 30 voters are motivated to get out to the polls to vote for Obama.

I will do my part and vote no on prop. hate(8)
Maybe if they get stomped at the polls they will give up on this effort. (at least in CA)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pray to destroy marriage
Posted by: MickeyC on Oct 11, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why would anyone pray to destroy the marriage of over 11,000 people? It is beyond my comprehension that anyone could actually want to harm so many people out of personal selfishness. Other people's marriages don't affect anyone outside the marriage, yet people are praying to do harm to others. What has this country come to?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Abolish all government endorsed marriages. No marriage, no confict about marriage. Simple
Posted by: Plexius2 on Oct 11, 2008 10:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marriage is both a personal and a religious act for most people. The government should NOT be involved. Instead, the government SHOULD be involved in civil unions for purposes of health, legal visitations, next-of-kin arrangements, insurance, etc.

If we get the government out of the MARRIAGE business and into CIVIL UNION business, people can marry whenever, however, and whomever they please in private ceremonies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

why don't they wage war against
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Oct 11, 2008 1:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
famine, poverty and disease?

Oh, right- those are things Jesus would do. Silly me.

jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let them prayer warriors keep praying
Posted by: rickiey on Oct 13, 2008 5:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Go for it!! How about fasting while they are at it?

Tell em to keep praying and keep praying.

The rest of us will merely vote. I'll pit my vote against their god any day.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legislating Hate
Posted by: WyrdSister on Oct 13, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is one thing, but praying to your God for discriminatory purposes has GOT to land this bunch in Hell for sure!

Maybe the Old Testiment God, that angry vengeful God, would respond to such plees of hate, but I dont't thing Jesus would stand for it.

How do you christians live with yourselves, really? My hope is that your god is a better judge of character than you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ATTACK RELIGION
Posted by: TheNamelessCity on Oct 14, 2008 11:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
TAX POLITICAL CHURCHES

ATTACK CHURCHES THAT ATTACK LIBERTY

ATTACK CONSERVATIVE AUTHORITARIANISM

CIVIL WAR AGAINST THEOCRACY/DOMINIONISM

GET READY TO FIGHT

Religious wackos have been attacking freedom and progress for millennia, time to rise up and attack back, people!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ATTACK RELIGION Posted by: rickiey
Jay
Posted by: jay1411 on Oct 14, 2008 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's good to see this interaction. The amendments are confusing enough that we need all the help we can get. I found some good info at a new site by the Collins Center for Public Policy. It has nonpartisan analyses of all the amendments, slide shows that explain them in a few words, a forum and more stuff: http://www.flamendments.org/.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the life of me,
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Oct 15, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cannot understand how allowing same-sex couples to legally marry harms heterossexual marriage in any way.
I am friends with many gay and lesbian couples who have gotten legally married, and their marriages have not changed mine in the slightest.
Just as Catholic churches cannot be forced to marry divorcees, and synagogues cannot be forced to marry Gentiles, no church will be forced to marry same-sex couples.
I am proud to belong to a UU church that has been performing marriage ceremonies for same-sex couples for decades, even though the marriages have no legal standing in my state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]