Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Self-Deportation Program Finds Few Takers

By Ruben Navarrette, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted August 13, 2008.


Is the government shocked that illegal immigrants aren't rushing to turn themselves in to federal authorities?
Advertisement

SAN DIEGO -- Have you ever seen a giant surrender? It's pretty pathetic.

That's the word that comes to mind when a gargantuan government agency with more than 16,000 employees and a $5 billion annual budget suddenly throws up its hands and gives up on one of its major responsibilities. In fact, when that agency is U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, there is even a name for the act of surrender: Operation Scheduled Departure.

We are now almost halfway into a 17-day pilot self-deportation program that ICE is trying out in San Diego and four other U.S. cities: Chicago, Phoenix, Charlotte, N.C., and Santa Ana, Calif. The program ends Aug. 22.

So far, not so good. There aren't many takers for the government's less-than-generous offer to allow 457,000 illegal immigrants without criminal records and who pose no threat to national security to voluntarily turn themselves in to federal authorities. Anyone who did want to schedule their own departure would be given 90 days to get their affairs in order and -- here's the part ICE doesn't advertise -- be outfitted with an electronic ankle bracelet to keep track of their whereabouts in the meantime.

The offer is being made to "fugitive aliens," people who have appeared before an immigration judge and been ordered to leave the country, but haven't complied with the deportation order.

That part isn't surprising. If the illegal immigrants are from Mexico, and the lion's share of them are, what awaits them at home isn't appealing -- the prospect of having to support their families on $6 per day when they could make 15 or 20 times that on this side of the border. Then there's the fact that, while ICE likes to project this image that it is roaming the countryside and "knocking on doors," I suspect that not that many doors actually get knocked on. In order to want to voluntarily leave the country, illegal immigrants have to have a realistic fear that they'll be picked up and that the process will be messier and perhaps more dangerous than the self-deportation route.

As it stands, most illegal immigrants are probably more likely to be struck by lightning than to ever be paid a visit by ICE. According to an ICE spokesman, last year the agency arrested about 30,000 fugitive aliens in the entire country. At that rate, it would take 400 years for the agency to clear through the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants now in the United States.

Do-nothingism is a reputation the agency has worked hard to build. Just ask any local or state police officer who, having run across an illegal immigrant and done his duty by calling ICE to pick him up, waited and waited only to eventually realize that no one was coming. Or ask any of those who were picked up in the recent series of immigration raids -- deservedly so, I might add -- but who had to watch those who had employed them, and in some cases allegedly abused them, get off without so much as a warning.

Clearly, ICE is suffering a meltdown. It is the result of an overhaul that the Immigration and Naturalization Service got after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, and now it desperately needs an overhaul of its own.

Of course, it's the future we're talking about. It's too late for the crew that is there now. Julie Myers, assistant secretary of homeland security for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, has been a disaster ever since she was nominated in 2005 when she was just 36. She is the niece of Richard Myers, a former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and she is married to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff's former chief of staff. Julie Myers got into trouble even before her Senate confirmation when a Homeland Security employee showed up at a staff Halloween party dressed in prison stripes, dreadlocks and dark makeup. Later, digital photos from the party surfaced, despite the fact that Myers had ordered them erased. That was embarrassing. Now, by signing off on this ridiculous self-deport program, Myers has made the agency a laughingstock.

The next president needs to make it clear that he's serious about immigration enforcement by finding a serious person to head what needs to once again be thought of as a serious agency. But who would want the job now? Say, why not take a page from the agency's playbook and ask for volunteers?

© 2008, The San Diego Union-Tribune

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: illegal immigrants, u.s. immigration and cust, self-deportation

Ruben Navarrette is an editorial writer and board member for The San Diego Union-Tribune. He also writes and records commentaries for National Public Radio's "Morning Edition."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Uh, let's think about this.....
Posted by: pfeifer999 on Aug 13, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can stay here, where I have cheap food, government provided healthcare, a job that pays well by my standards, and where no government officials beat me with riot batons.

OR, I can go home, where I had no job, no healthcare, very little food, and where an authoritarian government's agents can beat me and torture me at their will.

Uh, I dunno . . . . .

Good thing the US is a repressive shitty system with no opportunity for the repressed and exploited immigrants. Imagine how many "undocumented aliens" we'd have if this was still the land of opportunity. Phew!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hoisted on their own petard
Posted by: Bettybb on Aug 13, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ICE is playing it smart. The anti rule of law, pro anarachy and amensty illegal alien supporters have been whining that ICE's program of rounding up people who have ignored a court deportation order ( a felony )has been
"inhumane". They whimper that these criminals are humiliated by being arrested in front of their family and kids. So ICE has given them the option of obeying the law.

Are the illegals going to do it? LOL
Illegals ignore any law they don't like. They are lawless people.

So after the deadline, ICE will resume and step up its raids, and the the whiners will have nothing to say.

Obviously the only reason the illegals have been complaining is not that ICE has been inhumane, but they just don't think the law should apply to them and they think Americans don't have the right to enforce our laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hoisted on their own petard Posted by: note2self
Self Deportation
Posted by: L.A.Lynn on Aug 14, 2008 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are so many factions commenting on this issue. There is the xenophobic far rightwing crowd, and on the other side, the reconquista faction that wants to reclaim the southwest. I believe those two factions are a tiny minority, and most folks are just trying to figure this whole thing out.

If you're one of those folks in the middle, and you live somewhere in the east, or the middle of the country, where this is more of a news story, than a reality you have to deal with on a daily basis, you probably wonder why there's a problem with hard working people coming here to make a little money, and keep the home fires burning. That was me, twenty years ago.

I live in Los Angeles. I've worked with and for the disadvantaged, black, white, and brown. I use the streets and freeways, I have used the emergency rooms, my kid went to public school, I've used the police department after burglaries, and when clinics have been targeted by anti-choice bomb threats. I chose to live here, as many of those sneaking across the border. The flavor is American, and it is blessed with a Mexican-American heritage that gives it a flare, and is cherished by the majority of people living here. Overall, it has always been a melting pot of diversity. You would be hardpressed to be living here, and not have good friends who were born in another country, especially south of the border. And I consider myself lucky to have such friends. I have learned new ways of seeing things, and have been enriched, as has my family by said diversity.

So that's how I come to this issue. The state's infrastructure is overburdened with an influx of people that were never expected. I don't blame anyone for trying to make their life better. I just know that overpopulation is eating away at this state. The freeways are awful. The emergency rooms are flooded, and many are closing down. There is nearly a 50% dropout rate in highschool, and the schools which were once at the top of the list are failing miserably now. The police department is often just non existent for routine burglaries and such. There are shootings in the streets between rival drug gangs, and sometimes innocent citizens are targeted for getting in the way.

I have heard people in comments, and in the articles written here, say things like, "If these were illegals from Sweden (or some such overwhelmingly white country) no one would be so upset. Wrong! It's the numbers, not the skin color. And if it continues, it doesn't take a genius to see that this place will soon be as bereft of opportunity as the very one people have fled. And that's when we'll see mass self deportation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Recongusita? Posted by: paintchips
» RE: What Recongusita? Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» Ehh... Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Ehh... Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» RE: hh... lol Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Ehh... lol Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» RE: hh... lol Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Ehh... lol Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» RE: hh... lol Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Aztlan Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» RE: Aztlan Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Aztlan Posted by: L.A.Lynn
We can't have it both ways
Posted by: paintchips on Aug 15, 2008 10:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ICE is just trying to do it's job, congress is the one that has failed to pass comprehensive immigration reform.

Most economists agree immigration and yes even undocumented immigration has a small positive effect on the economy. I for one refuse to vilify those that do my dirty work.

This is a small program intended for a very small segment of the undocumented population. People with deportation orders. Most undocumented immigrants do not have deportation orders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh i can assure you
Posted by: Mexitli on Aug 25, 2008 12:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that there will be racism.

that's one reason i became an Aztlanista.

to counter the (mostly) radical youth and to offer a level of moderation.

but i stated that i believe it will be the euros who choose white flight.

heck, we have dirty politicians now under gringo rule. i can assure we will have corrupt - so called Aztlanista - politicians when the day comes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]