Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Olympics Expose the Total Hypocrisy of U.S. Immigration Laws

By Sally Kohn, Movement Vision Lab. Posted August 11, 2008.


Americans aren't known for their rational views on immigration. So it's no wonder we attack low-wage workers while celebrating immigrant athletes.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Sally Kohn

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

I have to confess I've never really cared about the Olympics. Since I'm not much for sports or raw nationalism, the fusion of the two doesn't really get me up in the morning. But I will tune in tonight to watch Lopez Lomong -- Sudanese "Lost Boy" turned U.S. track star -- carry the American flag in the opening ceremonies. I'm sure I'll have a tear in my eye, but also a twinge in my stomach for the profound irony of the moment. Some might even call it hypocrisy.

For here we are in the United States, where though the price of gas is skyrocketing, there seems to be endless fuel to feed the fires of anti-immigrant sentiment. But the Olympics are different, I guess. Is it the same with professional sports? Or the governorship of California? We don't like immigrants in low-wage jobs that none of us citizens want to do, but we don't mind immigrants in the exceptionally high-paying jobs that American-born citizens can only dream of?

What's the point complaining about an undocumented Mexican making $5 an hour in a chicken processing plant, who lost two of his fingers because of unsafe conditions and labor violations? Shouldn't we be more upset about Yao Ming making $15 million a year, plus endorsements?

Ah, but in America, we have a long and proud tradition of picking on the little guy. We also have a proud tradition of taking half-hearted moral stands. (Remember the Southern Compromise, anyone? Our continuing tolerance of segregation after abolition? Or the Bush Administration's rejection of nation-building ... ?) Why bother standing up for what's right when we can just talk about what we know is right but then just keep doing what we've always done.

Of course I don't want the anti-immigrant hate spewers to wizen up to their inconsistencies and expel the 33 immigrants on the U.S. Olympic team this year, let alone a vast number of our nation's doctors, nurses, engineers -- and one governor. But on the other hand, it would be refreshing if the anti-immigrant fanatics would just level with us -- and chant "Run home immigrant" at Lopez Lomong during his 1500 meter dash, as opposed to just chanting at the far less fortunate and far more desperate undocumented migrants who are just trying to get to work to make a day's pay. After all, factory workers and maids and farmworkers are easy targets. Let's see the anti-immigrant folks really test their theories and tirades by attacking people Americans really care about.

Because while Lou Dobbs and others will say it's just undocumented immigrants they mean to attack, it's not true. Accusations against undocumented immigrants also stick to legal immigrants and naturalized citizens, especially those from Latin America -- because we don't make much distinction between undocumented Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages and permanent resident or naturalized Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages. When Pat Buchanan says on Fox News, "You've got a wholesale invasion, the greatest invasion in human history, coming across your southern border, changing the composition and character of your country," he's not exactly distinguishing, is he?

And attacks against undocumented immigrants promote attacks against all immigrants. Recall after September 11th how Bush Administration rhetoric against "Muslim terrorists" led to a rise in hate crimes against Muslim and Arab gas station attendants, taxi cab drivers and other law-abiding immigrants and citizens. Lopez Lomong and Yao Ming had better stay alert.

In our two-tiered America -- with a persistent and wide gulf between the rich and the poor, those with power and those who are struggling, those who have every opportunity in life and those who have none -- is it any wonder we have a two-tiered take on immigration? In an America where we forgive Lindsay Lohan for repeated cocaine abuse but throw the book at poor African American men for even the most minor offenses, in an America where we give huge tax breaks to Wal-Mart and Exxon but refuse to raise funding for food stamps, is it any wonder we attack low-wage undocumented workers at the bottom of our society while celebrating immigrant athletes at the top?

You might be thinking, "But Lopez Lomong had a talent. He was a gifted runner and because of that our country rescued him from the violence and poverty of the Sudan." That's right. We're America. We give everyone a chance. Tonight we'll be celebrating what Lomong made of his opportunity. But let's not forget all the immigrants that we're denying an opportunity to.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: immigrants, olympics, prejudice

Sally Kohn is the director of the Movement Vision Project of the Center for Community Change, which is interviewing hundreds of activists across the country to determine the progressive vision for the future of the United States.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Because Undocumented Immigration Is A Complicated Issue
Posted by: paintchips on Aug 11, 2008 10:02 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We can all agree it's wrong to sneak across the border but almost all of us can agree that it's justifiable if your kids are starving and it's the only way to keep them alive is for you to risk your life crossing a desert in order to clean the bathrooms of people who vilify you.

Most economists say immigration has a small positive effect on our economy and the average American benefits from undocumented immigration.

Here is a case where something may be morally the right thing to do but legally not. It's messy. We have to change the laws so those 2 can meet but unfortunately the extremists are encouraging the status quo. We need to expand legal immigration routes to truly reduce undocumented immigration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Butthead Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: Butthead Posted by: jbitch
Lopez's Team Mate Leo Manzano was an undocumented immigrant
Posted by: paintchips on Aug 11, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out his fellow U.S. 1500 meter athlete Leonel Manzano, he used to be an undocumented immigrant and is now a U.S. Olympian.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You really can't tell the difference between illegal and legal immigrants?
Posted by: rickiey on Aug 11, 2008 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because I can.

Because while Lou Dobbs and others will say it's just undocumented immigrants they mean to attack, it's not true. Accusations against undocumented immigrants also stick to legal immigrants and naturalized citizens, especially those from Latin America -- because we don't make much distinction between undocumented Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages and permanent resident or naturalized Latino immigrants working crappy jobs for crappy wages.

I couldn't care less what Lou Dobbs has to say.

Immigration is the single key component, that has made our country great. Legal immigrants have to work their behinds off, just to get into this country legally. Those are the types of people we WANT here, because they innovate and work hard, and make this country.

Illegal immigrants are the ones that skip the process and take the easy, illegal way out. They are not the people that will improve this country.

The problem is that there is too little of the first, and way too many of the second.

However, you won't fix the problem with the second until you fix the problem with the first.

We NEED MORE LEGAL IMMIGRANTS. The process is too slow, and just plain ridiculous. Quite frankly, the amount of time it takes to come in legally is a huge contributor to the number of illegals we have. So lets fix the problem at the SOURCE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» go back to whiteland. Posted by: rickiey
» RE: go back to whiteland Posted by: blitzmesser
Winning is all that matters, right?
Posted by: countingdaisies on Aug 11, 2008 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author fails to specify if the immigrants participating in the olympics are legal or illegal. In this instance it doesn't really matter because neither should be representing a country of which they are not a citizen. Let's just make up the rules as we go along. 'Anything to Win' is a good motto.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Next, please.
Posted by: L.A.Lynn on Aug 11, 2008 2:22 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In our two-tiered America -- with a persistent and wide gulf between the rich and the poor, those with power and those who are struggling, those who have every opportunity in life and those who have none -- is it any wonder we have a two-tiered take on immigration? In an America where we forgive Lindsay Lohan for repeated cocaine abuse but throw the book at poor African American men for even the most minor offenses, in an America where we give huge tax breaks to Wal-Mart and Exxon but refuse to raise funding for food stamps, is it any wonder we attack low-wage undocumented workers at the bottom of our society while celebrating immigrant athletes at the top?

You're right, Sally. Who would want to live in such an evil country?

Give me a break! This isn't progressive writing. It's just bad writing. It's sad that there is simply no give and take on these pieces. Liberal used to mean you were open minded. There's just no such thing on this issue on Alternet. How can that be called progressive?

Metaphors using Lindsay Lohan and African American men? That's rich!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People need to stop being fanatical and start thinking clearly
Posted by: paintchips on Aug 11, 2008 2:42 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some of these comments clearly show how single minded and fanatical people on both sides can be. We should have passed comprehensive immigration reform a long time ago and fixed our immigration system but extremists on both side are stopping it. The bill passed by the senate in 2006 was a great example of a compromise and 2007 bill while not perfect was better than the status quo.

Let's fix the system and push the extremists out of the way. John McCain winning the republican nomination is a good sign and Obama has good stance on the issue as well. Let's hope that they aren't tugged into extreme positions by pressures on both sides.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» damn right Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: damn right Posted by: rickiey
High-tech abuse of immigration laws
Posted by: war_on_tara on Aug 11, 2008 4:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...we don't mind immigrants in the exceptionally high-paying jobs that American-born citizens can only dream of?

Many of us DO mind this! Silicon Valley wants an unlimited supply of high-tech immigrants, rather than do anything to help train Americans for those jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» liar Posted by: Mexitli
» RE: liar Posted by: rickiey
Oh please!
Posted by: lclark on Aug 12, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
America is the most ethnicly diverse nation on the planet. We have the most open system for immigration.

"Progressives" who support "comprehensive immigration reform" or amnesty, or open borders, are mindlessly supporting the agenga of the multinational corportocracy where cheap labor is imported and the benefits...education and public heathcare and social services are subsidized by the general tax roles.

This is about social engineering and economic agendas, but is presented as a humanitarian issue. These ad hominen approaches are just smoke and mirrors,

The majority of citizens, irregardless of their ethnic background, oppose open borders, but our 'enlightened leaders' and 'progressives' continue to press for the deconstruction of national sovreignty.

Wake up!. The dollar is imploding, American family farms have been deconstructed, and food is now a cartel, with food and food prices controlled by multinations that produce food one collective farms and control the whole stream of production, sale, and distribution of food.

Our manufacturing has been exported as well.

The basics are being collectivized, there is no 'free trade' but trade treaties crafted to lock in the advantages of select multination corporations to the point of superceding national laws.

The illegal immigration debates are just one aspect of a more comprehensive goal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh please! Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Oh please! Posted by: lclark
» RE: Oh please! Amen! Posted by: Old Skeptic
The View from Dublin
Posted by: strahlungsamt on Aug 12, 2008 6:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Ireland, a few generations ago, we were living in a giant Catholic cult compound. The Catholic Church was the Great Overlord who decided what was right and wrong for everybody. They were enshrined into the Irish Constitution until 1975 when they were voted out in a referendum.

If a child was born out of wedlock, they were given a pink birth certificate and branded a bastard for the rest of their lives. Yet sexual abuse, as well as every other kind of abuse, was rampant in schools, orphanages, church rectories and even in families where sexual knowledge was limited. Women gave birth to 20 children in their lifetimes and the Church encouraged them to please their husbands.

Then in 1992 Bishop Casey revealed he had a love child in America and all Hell broke loose. Women revealed they had affairs with priests and then all the child sex abuse stories started to come out. It was Ireland's "Truth Commission" and it liberated society from Catholic oppression. In 1996 divorce and Playboy became legalized for the first time ever. Church attendance dropped alarmingly.

Then something big happened.

Immigration.

Since one in three immigrants in Ireland is Polish, the Churches have filled up again. But that's not what disturbs me. What disturbs me is, that after all our "Liberal" struggles to get the Church out of our lives, we saturate the country with Bible beating Africans and Sharia Law abiding Muslims. I see Irish beggars every day begging for money while Roma sell the homeless paper. Meanwhile the Irish media fetishises the fact that we have become a "Mini United Nations" like having an unlimited number of foreigners has no negative consequences whatever. And now I'm a racist for pointing out the truth.

Don't believe me? Look at France. Remember those riots a few years back? Look at how Liberal Holland has to compromise its liberalism rather than offend a few Muslims who kill a film director. Look at how the Danish Mohammed cartoons caused the flags to be burned. In Berlin, I was reading about attacks on teachers in high schools increasing. The press were asking why but, as always, too PC to notice that all the attackers had the first name "Mohammed".

Basically, what's happening everywhere in the "Liberal" World is that we are so "Liberal" and so "Tolerant of Other Views" that we let in anybody and everybody, even if they are more Fascist than the system we fought hard to reform. It's happening in Europe and it's happening in America.

Wake up Liberals. The only people who benefit from uncontrolled immigration are the Rich and the churches. You lose your job, they gain cheap labor. You speak out, you're a racist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The View from Dublin Posted by: lclark
» RE: The View from Dublin Posted by: weenie
» Apples, oranges, and Muslims Posted by: JakobFabian01
The Olympics is nothing but hidden FRAUD and RACISM at large !
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 12, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's funny how we the American people act like LOSERS try to preach China on "democracy" when our country can't even come close to practicing it. And what about that "free" trade scam both parties signed in 2000? Go visit the Chinese SLAVE labor when you get a chance and take a second look at your products and ask yourselves "We Americans used to take the time to make quality longer lasting versions. When the fuck are we gonna stop relying on slave labor to give us piss poor quality versions and put this whole sale volume sale e-CON-uh-me-me-me SHIT behind us?"
And don't forget that America is borrowing HEAVILY from China to keep the funding for these illegal wars for oil and tax cuts for the wealthy elite on life support !!

It's no wonder that

GOD IS CONTINUING TO SEVERELY PUNISH AMERICA TO ETERNAL DAMNATION !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By the way, here's the movie that exposes the FRAUD and RACISM of the Olympics.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 12, 2008 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's called "COOL RUNNINGS".

P.S.: Like Big Pharma, the corporate-sponsored Olympics has no problem giving athletes SUPER-POISONED with Big Pharma BULLSHIT "qualified" status all the while going hostile on those who use Cannabis to keep their cool.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The hypocrisy is "freedom-loving" Amercians: Ignoring Red China's slave labor force.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 12, 2008 10:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While you are online today, visit the Web site of prominent human rights activist Harry Wu's organization by clicking on: Harry Wu . There you will learn about "Laogais."

Laogai is the equivalent of "gulag" in the former Soviet Union. Before buying another Chinese-made product, you owe it to yourself as a freedom-loving American to learn about Laogais (prison camps) in Red China.

Laogai means "reform through labor." Here is an example Laogai extracted from a Dunn & Bradstreet database:

"Location: #77 East Qiyi Rd., Baoding City Postal Code: 071000
Tel: 0312-5024903 (switchboard) 5923500 (printing works) Fax: 0312-5923509. Originally called "Province No. 1 Prison." Produces model AB-1 infrared alarm equipment, model JZJ-50 welders, electronic controllers, ceramic and machine tools."


A total of 314 separate entries can be found for Laogai camps in Dunn & Bradstreet databases. They represent 256 different Laogai camps or approximately 25% of the total known camps as of 2006. A total of 65 entries in the D&B databases contained the word "Prison" in the name.

In 2004, Red China's Laogai system was estimated to have as many as 6,000 prison camps with an inmate population ranging from 10 to 20 million. Typically the workers labor 15 hous daily, seven days a week, for mere pennies a day. Think about that the next time you shop at Walmart.


With love,

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran [For the benefit of first-time AlterNet visitors]
Seven Reasons to Vote Against Unfit McCain


.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indoctrination
Posted by: Paul1939 on Aug 12, 2008 10:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is telling the same lie repeatedly so that people will come to believe it is true, and not a lie. Sally Kohn states, “In our two-tiered America -- with a persistent and wide gulf between the rich and the poor, those with power and those who are struggling, those who have every opportunity in life and those who have none -- is it any wonder we have a two-tiered take on immigration?” What she does not say is that virtually every society in human history has had its rich and poor segments. She also fails to note that during and immediately after WWII, the US began to build a large, diverse, and vibrant middle class. While it is true that minorities have always suffered at the hands of the country’s elites and large majorities of its population, the US has gone a long way to address those inequities.

During the 20th and 21st century the Republican Party, with some notable exceptions, fought every effort to expand the middle class and improve the plight of minorities. Democrats, with the exception of Southern Democrats (now Republicans), have usually been in the vanguard of efforts to expand the middle class and improve social justice for minorities.

The Democratic Party’s position towards the middle class, however, began to change with Bill Clinton and continues today! When Bill Clinton embraced the free trade/global economy policies of Ronald Reagan, the Republican Party, Wall Street, and the wealthy elites, he signed a warrant to decimate the US middle class. Remember it was Bill Clinton and a Democratic Congress, with the enthusiastic and full support of the Republican Party, that passed NAFTA, WTO, and most favored trade status for China. These laws legalized shipping our manufacturing infrastructure and associated jobs to China and other nations with very poor workers .

With billions of dollars extracted for the middle class firmly fixed in law, it was now time to do the same for to the working poor and those who work in jobs that can’t be easily shipped overseas. Massive legal and illegal immigration is the tool to accomplish that objective. Ask yourself; do those who support the flood of illegal aliens and legal immigrants (over 70 million since 1970) provide any demonstrable evidence showing how US workers or citizens benefit from their amnesty or temporary workers proposals? Do they demonstrate how the US benefits from replacing college educated US citizens with H1B visa workers from India and China help the US workers they replace or US citizens? I know I have not seen any. No they engage in ad hominem attacks and obfuscation efforts. What on earth does past immigration policies have to do with whether today’s proposals make sense for America today? I know I can’t see any connection.

Democrats often wonder how the religious right can be convinced to vote against their own best interest when presented the wedge issues Carl Rove and other Republicans constantly raise. I wonder how Democratic voters can vote against their own self-interest by calls of racism, bigotry, hatred of brown people, and the other obfuscation efforts put forward by Democrats and various interest groups.

If amnesty for illegal aliens and massive immigration, legal and illegal, is good for American, give us the proof. The fact of the matter is that it is very bad for the country and particularly bad for US citizen workers! That’s why you can’t find any demonstrable proof.

If you think massive immigration is a good idea, visit Los Angeles to see first hand what is coming to a town near you in the near future if you don't work to stop it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Indoctrination Posted by: L.A.Lynn
» RE: Indoctrination Posted by: richholland
» RE: Indoctrination: All too true Posted by: Old Skeptic
» Correlation and cause Posted by: JakobFabian01
Anti-Immigration IS Racist
Posted by: vivachavez on Aug 12, 2008 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You nutjobs that piss and moan about illegal immigrants and immigration in general are racists because you wouldn't be fear-mongering if they were white protestants.

Liberals favor providing workplace safety regulations and increasing wages to help undocumented immigrants and prevent their exploitation. Liberals favor immigration reform not out of fear of brown catholics coming to their country but because they abhor undocumented immigrants' exploitation.

America must work to reform Mexico's economic system and bring them into the modern era when it comes to family planning. NAFTA must be revoked because it is personally responsible for putting millions of poor farmers out of work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The big bully
Posted by: reinaldok on Aug 13, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is it any wonder that sport's fans all over the world are not necessarily cheering for their home teams? They are cheering against that big bully: US of A. Of course the overbearing attitude of the USA for at least the last seven years is one explication. I, too was also amazed the see the former Kenyan champion carry the American flag in the procession. Last night I decided to take a look at the famous American gymnastics team. Well, what did I find? One of the shining stars of the woman's team is just another case of the Washington bullies at work. She just happens to have been brought over recently, almong with her champion parents from that one time enemy RUSSIA. Start investigating and you will find that this is nothing new to the Bush-Cheney clan. At the last winter olympics,
Bush signed at the last possible moment the papers required to make a great Canadian Ice Skater an American. None of our faux news or other media saw anything strange about this.
BTW - she did not win the gold - (to the cheers of skating fans all over the world). Just another case of Washington throwing away more and more ever so worthless dollars. Ever wonder why they are really worth less?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Christ you're dumb
Posted by: YogiBear on Aug 13, 2008 4:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course I don't want the anti-immigrant hate spewers to wizen up to their inconsistencies and expel the 33 immigrants on the U.S. Olympic team this year, let alone a vast number of our nation's doctors, nurses, engineers -- and one governor

For the last friggin time, people are upset about those who refuse to apply for citizenship. That's all. Dumbass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Christ you're dumb Posted by: Kim929
» RE: Christ you're dumb Posted by: YogiBear
» Not Christ - You! Posted by: JakobFabian01
Individualism, the myth of meritocracy, and white privilege
Posted by: chojisuk on Aug 13, 2008 7:50 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In this dichotomy between praised immigrant athletes, such as Yao Ming and Lopez Lomong, and scrutinized working-class immigrants, I see characteristics of individualism and meritocracy justifying this dichotomy... With this in mind, the logic goes.. Yao Ming and Lopez Lomong are praised and wonderful because as individuals, they have overcome many obstacles and are hard-working thus they deserve such high respects and praise. I do feel proud for them and will be cheering them on of course, but am observing this logic(which really is how many success stories are explained and justified in the US) and am leering and critical of this kind of logic because I feel it is very damaging in the long run.

One, it is separating these athletes as special, better, and different than "those immigrants" (the ones that are stereotyped, racialized in negative ways, and are doing a lot of the nitty-gritty work that keeps the US running). Thus, this logic says it is okay to keep this dichotomoy and continue to scrutinize many of the immigrants in this country.

Secondly, the logic is also flavored by characteristics of white privilege. By praising these immigrants of color as well as other US athletes of color for their hard-work and courage as well as praising all athletes for their hard work(which yes again I believe it is true that all athletes work hard), it is undermining real systems that have given many white people more advantages and opportunities in the US than many low-income and working class people, of which is disproportionately people of color. White privilege sustains itself because it justifies the success of white people by saying it was the individual's good work ethic. However, white privelge ignores the systematic advantages that white people (especially white, heterosexual men) have received at the cost of people of color in the US.

Again, I definitely do respect athletes for their hard work (and in fact I'm watching the Olympics right now *smile*) but my comments here just provide my perspective on WHY this dichotomy happens and is justified.. and why their is such a hypocrisy between the anti-immigrant political climate in the US and the respect for athletes such as Yao Ming and Lopez Lomong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Okay a piece about sports by someone who hates sport.
Posted by: DaBear on Aug 13, 2008 9:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That makes total sense.

Best Olympic story so far, the dude from Togo who kicked ass in the K-1 whitewater slalom and then in the interview said, "I'm not much on this competitor thing, but I just do this for pleasure" and he couldn't wait to do the run again.

Best. Athlete. Ever.

All that immigrant stuff is just white supremacist bullshit and all them shitheads can rot in hell for all I care. Humans need to move about the planet and they usually do it so they can eat. Fuck the idiots who feel they have to control that for their own racist ideology and religious claptrap. Nation states are the tools of the 18th century aristocracy and their 21st century offspring. Behind every rich guy there's a crime.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]