IMMIGRATION  
comments_imageCOMMENTS: 4

Secure and Safe Detention and Asylum Act Reintroduced; Opportunity to Fix Shameful Detention System

The time has come for Congress to protect the basic human rights of the 311,000 people held in the detention system every year.
June 16, 2008  |  
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest Immigration headlines via email.

 
 
Advertisement
 
Members of the U.S. Congress have a significant opportunity to restore decency and end the human rights violations inside immigrant detention centers in the United States by supporting the Secure and Safe Detention and Asylum Act, S. 3114, reintroduced today by Senators Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and Chuck Hagel, R-Nebraska.

The National Immigrant Justice Center has joined a broad coalition of 54 faith-based, human rights, and community organizations in a letter of support.

In the past month, several media outlets have detailed the dismal state of the immigrant detention system in the United States. From government documents and interviews with former detainees and their families, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and 60 Minutes have reported stories of medical neglect, unreported deaths and suicides, forced sedation of detainees by immigration officers, and a severe lack of resources for doctors and nurses working inside immigrant detention facilities.

Now armed with hundreds of pages of evidence, the time has come for Congress to restore and protect the basic human rights of the 311,000 men, women, and children held in the detention system every year. The Secure and Safe Detention and Asylum Act calls for improved detention conditions and better oversight of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities. Additionally, it would allow immigration judges to review the cases of asylum seekers and release those individuals who pose no threat to society.

According to a press release from the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, the Secure and Save Detention and Asylum Act would:


  • Mandate improved detention conditions, including prompt medical care that complies with accreditation requirements, unobstructed access to legal counsel, limits on the use of solitary confinement and other punitive treatment, and special standards for families and for victims of persecution and torture.

  • Substantially enhance the rights of asylum seekers and others to have their detentions reviewed promptly by an immigration judge and to be considered for release if they pose no risk to public safety.

  • Enhance alternatives to detention such as supervised release programs.

  • Require the recording of interviews with detained asylum seekers and other quality assurance measures to ensure these individuals are not erroneously returned to countries where they fear persecution.

  • Establish an Office of Detention Oversight within the Department of Homeland Security to audit and investigate detention facilities' compliance with standards and to report to Congress.

  • Mandate the reporting and investigation of all deaths that occur in detention facilities.


The Secure and Safe Detention and Asylum Act was debated in Congress in 2006 and 2007, when it was included in immigration reform legislation. The act passed the Senate last year as an amendment to the wider comprehensive immigration reform bill that was not enacted.

The National Immigrant Justice, a partner of Heartland Alliance for Human Needs & Human Rights, provides direct legal services to and advocates for immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers through policy reform, impact litigation, and public education.
Email
Print
Share
Post on reddit
Post on stumbleupon
Post on facebook
Post on digg
Post on twitter
Post on delicious
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest Immigration headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: immigration, human rights, detention centers


Comments are closed-

It's about time
Posted by: wyla on Jun 17, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am glad to see that the U.S. government is finally doing something to address the atrocious conditions that asylum seekers face when they come to this country. These are people who have fled for their lives and have come to the U.S. out of desperation, hoping that they can find refuge here. So do we reach out to them with open arms and offer them that refuge until they can safely return to their homes? No, we send them to prison and treat them like criminals. We deny them the rights of legal representation and a fair trial. We fail to provide basic social services. As mentioned in the article, there have been a number of reports lately of people in detention being denied medical care, and even accounts of people dying. Some people have been held in detention for years, in which families are separated. What kind of a way is that for a country that stands for freedom and democracy (supposedly) to treat people? No wonder so many people hate us. So I am glad that Congress is now seeking to reform the system. Positive change is possible, if we are willing to work for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Why detention?
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jun 17, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There would be no need to build detention centers for illegal immigrants if they were deported upon capture. Our tax dollars should be put to better use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WTF? Posted by: Mexitli

Comments are closed-

Asylum seekers are not immigrants
Posted by: wyla on Jun 17, 2008 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many political blogs, I have seen that people often confuse immigrants and asylum seekers. (Refugees, who may be asylum seekers, are also often confused with immigrants.) Asylum seekers, which is the group of people whom this legislation addresses, do not choose to leave their countries of origin. They are forced to do so because they are in danger. Once they get to a place of safety, or perhaps before they get there, they apply for asylum. Not all refugees apply for asylum, thus not all are asylum seekers. Asylum seekers do not necessarily want to go to another country to live, but it is either that or, probably, death. Once it is safe to return to their home countries, they may do so. Asylum is a temporary state. However, instead of trying to help asylum seekers, we tend to put them into detention, which is like prison. And sometimes we do deport asylum seekers if they are not granted asylum. The problem is, if you flee your country because it is likely that you will be killed if you stay, being forcefully returned will put you back into danger. Besides being inhumane, this is also a violation of international law to which the United States is a signatory. I find it ironic that we rail against people being here illegally, when as a nation we do things that are illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet Comments:

Comments are closed-

It's about time
Posted by: wyla on Jun 17, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am glad to see that the U.S. government is finally doing something to address the atrocious conditions that asylum seekers face when they come to this country. These are people who have fled for their lives and have come to the U.S. out of desperation, hoping that they can find refuge here. So do we reach out to them with open arms and offer them that refuge until they can safely return to their homes? No, we send them to prison and treat them like criminals. We deny them the rights of legal representation and a fair trial. We fail to provide basic social services. As mentioned in the article, there have been a number of reports lately of people in detention being denied medical care, and even accounts of people dying. Some people have been held in detention for years, in which families are separated. What kind of a way is that for a country that stands for freedom and democracy (supposedly) to treat people? No wonder so many people hate us. So I am glad that Congress is now seeking to reform the system. Positive change is possible, if we are willing to work for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]


Comments are closed-

Why detention?
Posted by: countingdaisies on Jun 17, 2008 9:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There would be no need to build detention centers for illegal immigrants if they were deported upon capture. Our tax dollars should be put to better use.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WTF? Posted by: Mexitli

Comments are closed-

Asylum seekers are not immigrants
Posted by: wyla on Jun 17, 2008 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In many political blogs, I have seen that people often confuse immigrants and asylum seekers. (Refugees, who may be asylum seekers, are also often confused with immigrants.) Asylum seekers, which is the group of people whom this legislation addresses, do not choose to leave their countries of origin. They are forced to do so because they are in danger. Once they get to a place of safety, or perhaps before they get there, they apply for asylum. Not all refugees apply for asylum, thus not all are asylum seekers. Asylum seekers do not necessarily want to go to another country to live, but it is either that or, probably, death. Once it is safe to return to their home countries, they may do so. Asylum is a temporary state. However, instead of trying to help asylum seekers, we tend to put them into detention, which is like prison. And sometimes we do deport asylum seekers if they are not granted asylum. The problem is, if you flee your country because it is likely that you will be killed if you stay, being forcefully returned will put you back into danger. Besides being inhumane, this is also a violation of international law to which the United States is a signatory. I find it ironic that we rail against people being here illegally, when as a nation we do things that are illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

 
Advertisement
From The Blog
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS