Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Instead of Scapegoating Immigrants, Wage and Workplace Enforcement for Everyone

By Joe Bolkcom, AlterNet. Posted May 5, 2008.


Immigrants don't work jobs Americans won't take -- they work side by side together so let's help both prosper.

As families in Iowa struggle to make ends meet, they are justified in feeling threatened when they see what were once good jobs turned into low-wage, sweatshop labor.

In industries across the country, workers are not receiving the wages owed them under minimum-wage and overtime laws. Earlier this decade, a U.S. Department of Labor report found that 60 percent of U.S. nursing homes routinely violated overtime, minimum-wage or child-labor laws. Other studies have found similar levels of violations in the garment and restaurant industries.

Advertisement

In Iowa, the minimum-wage and overtime laws have some of the weakest enforcement provisions of any state in the country. Penalties usually amount to no more than telling employers to pay what they originally owed their workers. Because legal action is so expensive and so likely to produce meager returns, few employees can afford to pursue claims. Because civil fines are so low, the state doesn't collect enough for strong, ongoing enforcement.

Legislators in the Iowa Senate have introduced SSB 3286 to put real teeth into Iowa's wage-and-hour laws. The bill would significantly raise civil fines for violators, require them to pay legal damages of up to twice the amount of unpaid wages, and better protect from retaliation employees who complain about illegal conditions.

It also would provide extra protection for workers by preventing them from being misclassified as "independent contractors" and thus stripped of basic labor rights. Enacting SSB 3286 would create the disincentives necessary to eliminate sweatshops in Iowa.

Of course, there are other less effective "solutions" on the table. Because many employees in sweatshops are undocumented immigrants, some propose punishing them for accepting their jobs in the first place. But that would hardly eliminate sweatshops. Most workers toiling in illegal working conditions are citizens or legal residents. Punishing undocumented co-workers would not increase wages or improve conditions for legal workers. That would make things worse by driving the problem further underground, rather than eliminating it.

If, instead, Iowa were to ensure that all employers paid a decent wage, the attraction of hiring undocumented immigrants would diminish tremendously. Any hiring of undocumented immigrants would then be due to legitimate shortages in the labor supply, not to employers using those workers to illegally undermine wage standards for the rest of the work force.

The success of this approach has been demonstrated in other states. In the mid-1980s, California began to crack down aggressively on wage-law violations. Wage standards were raised for workers across the state, and the Los Angeles metropolitan area deflected a million immigrants to other cities between 1980 and 2000. As UCLA professor Ivan Lighty documented in his 2006 book, "Deflecting Immigration," those 1 million immigrants went instead to states such as Iowa, with poorly enforced wage laws.

Cracking down on the underground economy of wage violators also would also raise revenue for Iowa's state budget. The state would collect millions of dollars in unpaid unemployment insurance, workers comp and income taxes from companies that underreport wages or fail to pay them at all by misclassifying employees as independent contractors. A recent sweep in New York State found that 2,078 employers had failed to report $19 million in wages to the state through misclassification of their workers, thereby avoiding $1 million in unemployment-insurance payments alone.

Both workers and responsible employers suffer when bottom-feeding businesses violate wage laws and receive a slap on the wrist. SSB 3286 promises to not only raise wage standards for all Iowa workers but bolster state revenues — without scapegoating immigrant workers who are also the victims of scofflaw employers.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: california, iowa, wage enforcement, immigration

Joe Bolkcom is an Iowa state senator from Iowa City. This column originally appeared in the Desmoines Register and is reprinted with permission.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from Immigration! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Tools: [Post a new comment] [Login] [Signup] View:
Face Reality
Posted by: Last Chance on May 5, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The population explosions in Latin America, Asia and Africa are the engines of illegal immigration into the USA, Western Europe and wherever else they go - and the only effective solution is to establish family planning clinics in every nation and give all women everywhere the legally protected right to decide if and when to birth children. As it is now, macho husbands, church authorities and businessmen all conspire to create an ever-growing mass of migrant laborers who must compete for whatever jobs and wages they can find - whereas if they reduce their own population to make their labor a scarce commodity, corporations would have to pay higher wages to attract whoever is willing to do the work, wages they cannot afford to pay, so their megafarms would be sold off to family farmers. Then, a smaller human population of ecology-conscious citizens in every nation would have access to plenty of resources for everyone. If Saving the Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maybe Posted by: Mexitli
Another Latrine Economist
Posted by: Mexitli on May 5, 2008 11:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many businesses does this author own? How many employees does he have?

What Iowa's law will do is the same as what similar laws in other states have done - zap jobs out of the economy.

You cannot fix these situations from the bottom up either from the employer side or from the employee side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another Latrine Economist Posted by: Joshua Holland
» So be it? Posted by: Mexitli
Make it Easy to Organize a Union
Posted by: BobS on May 5, 2008 11:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Modern market economies rely on a strong labor movement to insure that labor laws are passed and enforced, social benefits are available to all workers, discrimination is not tolerated and that wealth is more equitably distributed in the society.

Our labor laws are designed to do weaken our market economy by excluding working class people from participating in the actual functioning of that economy except as silent powerless consumers.

It's also very difficult to build a strong labor movement when immigrant workers are afraid to stand in solidarity because of fear of being deported.

The old slogan, "An injury to one is an injury to all" still holds true. If employers can get away with brutalizing immigrant workers they'll do the same to home-grown Americans as soon as they get the chance.

The example of the Scandinavian countries suggest what is possible when a well organized labor movement is in place. I say we beat the these modern Vikings in international competition and OUTDO their labor movements.

Now that's some global competition I could get enthused about. We're Americans. We're supposed to be high aiming achievers. Maybe it's time to prove that and build a society we can be proud of.

Bob Simpson
The BobboSphere

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]