comments_image Comments

4 Terrible Outcomes of a Romney Supreme Court

Romney’s appointees are likely to essentially rewrite the Constitution.
 
 
Share

US Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney (C) shakes hands with employees and their family members as he arrives at Ariel Corporation to attend a town hall style meeting in Mount Vernon, Ohio. Romney assured Wednesday he would be a "pro-life presid

 

 

In an interview with the  Columbus Dispatch yesterday, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney brushed off a suggestion that he would  usher in a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. Wade, stating that “[t]hat’s not where America is now.” That does not mean, however, that Romney will not usher in massive changes to the Constitution if he is given the opportunity to name new Supreme Court justices. Here are just four ways that Romney’s appointees would vote to effectively rewrite the Constitution if given the chance to do so:

  • Eliminating The Right To An AbortionRoe v. Wade is already on life support. The Court’s current majority weakened the longstanding rule ensuring that women may  terminate pregnancies that threaten their health, claiming instead that a federal abortion restriction should be allowed in part because “some women come to regret” their own reproductive choices. If Romney were able to add an additional conservative to the Supreme Court,  Roe would likely be forfeit.
  • Judges For Sale: Romney named Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito  as his models should he be allowed to pick new judges. All four said the Supreme Court should have done nothing when a wealthy coal baron payed $3 million to place a sympathetic justice on the West Virginia Supreme Court. That justice then cast the key vote to overrule a $50 million verdict against the coal baron’s company. Romney may even want his justices to go much further in permitting the very wealthy to buy elections — he previously endorsed  allowing billionaires to give unlimited sums of moneydirectly to his campaign.
  • Government In The Bedroom: Only five of the Supreme Court’s current justices joined the landmark  Lawrence v. Texas decision, which struck down Texas’ “sodomy” laws and held that the government cannot “demean” a couple by “making their private sexual conduct a crime.” An additional conservative justice would place  Lawrence in jeopardy.
  • Tossing Out The Constitution’s Text: As a top conservative judge who received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from George W. Bush once explained, the legal case against the Affordable Care Act has  no basis “in either the text of the U.S. Constitution or Supreme Court precedent.” Romney would appoint more justices who embrace this lawless legal theory.

Four of the Court’s current justices are  over the age of 74.

Ian Milhiser is a Policy Analyst and Blogger on legal issues at the Center for American Progress and the CAP Action Fund.
 
See more stories tagged with: