climate

Fox News details evidence Trump fears his agenda is in severe jeopardy

On Thursday, Fox News warned its conservative viewers that there is a clear sign President Donald Trump is “worried” that his agenda is in “real trouble.” According to longtime Fox financial analyst Stuart Varney, the president’s frantic campaign schedule suggests that he knows the GOP majority is “at stake" – if it's not lost already.

“The president's doing a rally a day, sometimes two,” explained Varney. “He's been appearing in red states – that implies he's worried about the turnout.” Varney was alluding to the fact that Trump’s campaign schedule has him focusing on states and districts once thought safely Republican, touring the likes of firmly Republican-held Oklahoma and Alabama as well as surprise toss-ups in Texas and Kansas, while he and the GOP commit less and less time and resources to places like North Carolina. As Varney and others have noted, this implies that Trump and his party are aware of the coming losses and desperate to shore up support wherever they can. “He's pulling out all the stops,” said Varney. “He didn't get back from Montana until four o'clock this morning. He'll do several tele-rallies today. He'll be in Georgia tomorrow. The pressure is on.”

According to Varney, “Fox Power rankings suggest the House is very likely to go Democrat. The Senate is a toss-up. The latest Fox poll shows 54 percent prefer Democrat candidates, 45 percent Republicans, and the lead by the Democrats is widening. Worse, voters are very unhappy with inflation – increasingly unhappy. 77 percent disapprove of his policy, only 22 percent think he's doing an OK job. That's a massive gap.” His warning to Republicans comes as a new Fox poll released Wednesday revealed that Trump’s approval has plunged to the network’s lowest on record, cratering to 36 percent. 60 percent of voters declared cost of living their top concern, with the majority predicting things will get worse. On top of that, a majority of Americans disapprove of his handling of foreign policy and even immigration. The decline has come as Trump has lost voters under age 45, those with annual household income below $50,000, non-White voters, and those without a college degree.

And as Varney suggested, the numbers make it clear that a midterm reckoning is coming. According to Fox, 7 in 10 say they will vote to send a message to Trump, with nearly twice as many expressing opposition (47 percent) as support (25 percent). Democrats not only lead on a generic House ballot, but have expanded that lead over the past month. What’s more, the poll found that Democrats lead on 10 out of 13 issue concerns, including healthcare, inflation, gas prices, election integrity, government corruption, AI, foreign policy, and more. “The issue that helps explain the Democrats’ advantage isn’t an issue at all," noted Fox. "By a 14-point margin, more voters think the Democrats will do a better job ‘fighting for people like you.’"

As a result of all of this, explained Varney, Trump is now desperately campaigning for toss-up and losing candidates in places he won handily two years ago. “This is intense politics, and so it should be,” Varney concluded with a warning to his fellow conservatives. “At stake is the Republican control of Congress. Lose it, and Trump's agenda is in real trouble.”

Trump's fake 'ceasefire' just handed Putin a $4 billion lifeline: NYT columnist

The war was not going well for Russia, and it hasn't been since Ukraine stopped holding back its strikes. Until recently, Russia’s offensive was failing, and its battlefield momentum had largely stalled. That's when President Donald Trump threw Vladimir Putin a lifeline.

New York Times columnists David French and Thomas Friedman both detailed in their columns Thursday that Trump's "deal" for a small purchase of diesel from Russia will go down in history as not only a strategic misstep but it will only add to Trump's support of Russia over the years.

“He will enter the history books in the chapter on leaders who sold out their country’s democratic values to appease a dictator," Friedman blasted in his column.

French agreed, "He is turning the American government against Ukraine, funding Russia and — perhaps worst of all — playing directly into Putin’s theory of victory.”

Trump's purchase, he continued, will put roughly $4 billion into the Russian coffers at a time that Putin desperately needs it. Meanwhile, a March CNN report alleged that Russia has been helping Iran by giving the country access to its intelligence, including where Americans are positioned in the region. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made a similar claim in June, saying Russia helped Iran. A further September CNN report cited two of Trump's own officials, who told them that Russian spy satellites are feeding intelligence to Iran.

But Trump has made it clear that he simply doesn't believe it, Politico reported last week.

Then Trump falsely claimed there was a "deal" and a "ceasefire."

"Consider that for a moment. Trump wasn’t announcing a deal at all. There was no deal. He made it up and then demanded that both nations do what he said," French wrote.

Ukraine complied, pausing its bombing, while Russia did not.

"I don’t think he deserves a respite," said Sergey Lavrov.

To Ukraine, French said, "the message is clear: You are at our mercy.”

It comes after Russia had a very bad summer, he noted. Their offensive was an utter failure. In all of 2026, Russia has managed to gain about 100 square kilometers, under 39 miles.

The Kyiv Post reported Thursday that Zelenskyy said, "We're done." He announced his intention to continue bombing Russian oil infrastructure, particularly after Russia began intentionally striking civilians.

Friedman said that he's never bought into the idea that Trump is some kind of Russian agent or being paid by Putin.

"It is much worse. He simply does not cherish democracy. He cherishes money. And he has no problem selling the first for the second. When he acts in his own commercial interests, that’s his personal business. When he uses the American presidency to make a buck, it is our collective shame," said Friedman.

French agreed, saying it isn't "America First"; it's "Trump First."

He fears that under Trump's second term, the U.S. is "worse than unreliable" he called it "unhinged." However, it'll cost more than just the U.S. It'll impact the world, French closed.

In his Thursday column, former Homeland Security chief of staff Miles Taylor wrote that he thinks it's time that investigations into Trump's "collusion with Russia" be rerenewed.

Trump's 'genius' brag comes with a nasty dig at his own MAGA fans

President Donald Trump boasted about being a "freaking genius" at his recent Arizona rally, but told his devoted followers that only a few of them will be able to manage the standard cognitive test.

Speaking in Bullhead City, Trump, 80, went on a long rant about how he aced the cognitive test he claims is very difficult and bragged endlessly about his intellect. As he described its difficulty, he expressed doubt about the abilities of people who had come to cheer him on to pass it.

"It's a very standard test, but very tough," Trump told the crowd. "There are few people in this audience that can..."

The president, however, believed his fans could handle the much simpler opening question: identifying a lion from pictures of several animals. He called that first question "quite easy," then insisted the questions would get significantly tougher later in the exam.

The president's remarks sounded like an unexpected jab at the very audience he was addressing. It comes after his October 10 rally in Tennessee, in which he told his fans, "I could say the stupidest things, and you'd clap."

Trump argued that mental arithmetic and word recall are more than most can handle, thereby making his own performance proof of his superior intellect.

In one instance, he described being handed five words to repeat at once and then, after further questioning, some half hour later. He said the professionals running the test took notice of his recollection of the words in the order they were given.

He then concluded that his ability to put them together is proof that he is a "freaking genius."

When Mediavine, which shared the clip from the rally, asked for comment about Trump’s remarks, White House spokesman Davis Ingle told the outlet:

“President Trump’s sharpness, unmatched energy, and historic accessibility stand in stark contrast to what we saw during the last administration when Democrats and the legacy media intentionally covered up Joe Biden’s serious mental and physical decline from the American people.”

Ingle added: “President Trump is working nonstop to solve problems and deliver on his promises, and he remains in excellent health.”

Trump has a history of insulting his own fans. In July 2025, he called his supporters “stupid” and “foolish” for demanding the release of the Epstein files

Some medical experts have theorized that Trump's lack of filter is a sign of dementia, and his symptoms have worsened over time.

Nancy Mace’s accusation against 4th man falls apart

Three of the four men accused by Representative Nancy Mace of sex crimes have been arrested in South Carolina in connection with the alleged 2018 sexual assault of a woman on Sullivan’s Island. The fourth man, Brian Musgrave, was also initially accused, but some prosecutors argue his name should never have been linked to the crime.

One of the men charged, 53-year-old Patrick Bryant, was previously engaged to Mace. Bryant was charged with one count of voyeurism. Another man, 46-year-old Eric Bowman, was also charged with voyeurism, obstruction of justice, and publishing the name of a victim of criminal sexual conduct. The third man, 46-year-old John Osbourne, was charged with assault and battery in the first degree and two counts of criminal sexual conduct in the third degree. Musgrave was not officially charged after it was determined that there was no evidence of his involvement, despite him being associated in some way with the three men charged.

According to ABC 4, Ninth Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson reviewed the case. In her review, she writes: "[Mace's] spurious claims against [Musgrave] demonstrate the severe credibility complications that taint some of the evidence underlying other allegations.” The report notes that Wilson pledged she was not conducting her own investigation, giving suggestions to the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) to make any arrests, or making any determination as to whether probable cause existed to support an arrest.

Per Wilson, the SLED investigative report offered "zero evidence" that Musgrave committed any crime because "zero evidence" was presented, nor was there any allegation ever made against him. "Nancy Mace only provided you questions and suppositions as to Musgrave’s involvement in crimes she claims have been committed by his friends and colleagues," she wrote, adding the congresswoman publicly labelled the man a "criminal and a predator" despite "the lack of even a scintilla of evidence" against him.

According to the allegations, the woman had been drinking and fell into a swimming pool at a Sullivan’s Island home, leaving her clothes wet. She undressed and fell asleep on a couch, covering herself with a pillow. While she was unconscious, Bryant, Bowman, and Osborne allegedly agreed that Osborne would have sex with the “mentally incapacitated and physically helpless” woman while the two men observed. A witness monitoring the home’s security camera feed reportedly overheard their conversation and saw Bowman and Bryant taking photos and/or videos of the woman. While watching the live feed, the witness also allegedly observed Osborne digitally penetrating, kissing, and performing oral sex on the victim.

Because of her unconscious state, the woman was unable to consent. Per Live 5 News, the alleged victim was 23 at the time of the assault. In a statement read in court by a SLED representative, the alleged victim revealed that she had not learned she was assaulted until 2024 and has PTSD related to the incident. In 2025, Bowman’s Sullivan’s Island home was the subject of a SLED search warrant where phones were seized as part of the investigation.

Mace accused all four men of playing various roles in the assault in 2025 in a speech she gave on the House floor in Washington, D.C. Bowman was arrested on a separate domestic violence-related charge in 2025.

Mace was not present during the recent court hearing. However, she says she remains a victims' rights advocate.

Leaker details Trump's track record of 'treason' worthy of 'impeachment'

On Thursday, a whistleblower from President Donald Trump’s first administration laid out the pattern of Russian collusion that has extended across both terms. According to Miles Taylor – who served as the Deputy Chief of Staff in Homeland Security and leaked White House secrets – Trump’s actions regarding Ukraine amount to “treason” worthy of impeachment.

As Taylor notes, this week has brought a flurry of controversy prompted by Trump’s actions regarding Russia and Ukraine. It began on Tuesday, when Russian ballistic missiles struck Ukraine without warnings that would usually come via U.S. satellites, killing and injuring dozens of Ukrainians. While American officials claimed the detection failed due to “bad weather,” Ukrainian officials said someone in the U.S. was “playing” with the system. Then the next day, Starshield – the military version of Elon Musk’s Starlink, which Ukrainian troops use to fly drones and intercept Russian attacks — was suddenly throttled without warning. Ukrainian President Zelenskyy was furious and warned that “people will die.” Musk surprised everyone by putting the blame on the White House, posting, “Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the U.S. military and ultimately POTUS.” The White House has not denied his claims.

“Are we to believe this was a coincidence?” asks Taylor. “Missile warnings and battlefield communications all coming down at the same time? Was it all ‘the weather’? Not even a fool would accept that conclusion. Look at last week, and you can surmise exactly what happened. And it may well be criminal.”

Days before, explains Taylor, Trump held a “suspicious” phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, after which he announced a deal to buy millions of tons of Russian diesel, breaking sanctions he himself signed into law mere weeks earlier. Even Republican Senators have warned that he broke the law by giving a financial gift to the U.S. adversary. On the same day, Trump’s envoys told Ukraine that if Kyiv didn’t stop striking Russian oil refineries, Washington would cut off intelligence. Then on Saturday, after Russian glide bombs killed 20 people in Ukraine, Trump said something that Putin “has been dreaming of, declaring, “It’s time for Ukraine to get a new president.” Finally, late Wednesday, FBI Director Kash Patel responded to reports that he’s planning to visit Moscow to meet with the FSB, the successor to the KGB, with the taunt, “From Russia, with Love…”

According to Taylor, “There are very serious questions here, with very serious implications for the Trump presidency. What did the president know, and when? What did Putin ask of Trump in that phone call? Did Donald Trump agree to give Putin a financial boost and buy his oil? Did Putin suggest it might help Trump in the midterms by lowering gas prices? Did Trump offer to weaken Ukraine’s defenses for Putin? Did Trump then personally order the Pentagon to restrict Ukraine’s satellite communications while Ukrainian cities were under attack? Did he order American agencies to sit on intelligence about incoming strikes? What, exactly, did the two men say to each other on Friday?”

As Taylor notes, Trump has actually already been impeached previously, in 2019, over this exact issue: withholding military support for Ukraine in order to extract a political benefit for himself in a “perfect phone call” with the Ukrainian leader. At the time, he froze foreign aid that was supposed to go to Ukraine in order to get leverage over them to help his re-election. Now he’s doing it again, though Taylor asserts the matter is “more serious” this time. “After a very suspicious phone call with Vladimir Putin,” writes Taylor, “Trump may have shut down early warning systems and battlefield communications — by literally switching them off while civilians slept in their apartments in Ukraine, in the crosshairs of Russia — in order to pressure Ukraine into a bogus ‘energy ceasefire’ in order to herald lower gas prices before the U.S. midterm elections.”

While this situation doesn’t precisely fit the Constitutional definition of treason, in Taylor’s estimation, “a president who puts his allies in mortal danger with favors to an enemy and for personal benefit has essentially done what treason describes. And impeachment doesn’t require a statute. Indeed, the words ‘high crimes and misdemeanors' were written to allow Congress to impeach a president for abuses of the public trust, and there’s no clearer abuse than a commander in chief using American intelligence as leverage against the people it was built to protect, on behalf of the dictator trying to kill them.” Trump has been impeached over such actions before. Now, writes Taylor, “The question our country must confront is whether the leader of the United States lowered the shield so that Putin could carry out murder and so that he could secure some political wins. In 2017, it took a special counsel to find out what Trump and Russia were doing together. In 2026, it might get blown open over an alleged lie about a weather report. The collusion is real.”

Trump's $333 million ballroom donor list leaks with explosive revelation

President Donald Trump's secret White House ballroom donor list has leaked, revealing that some of the $333 million comes from companies with lucrative government business interests and a $2.5 million pledge by the daughter of a banker who Trump later pardoned.

Internal fundraising records obtained by The Washington Post identify 67 donations over $10,000 and show at least $77 million came from donors who requested to stay anonymous. The report says the money was funneled through a nonprofit into a White House account controlled by the president.

One of the more controversial names on the list is Isabela Herrera, who is the daughter of international banker Julio Herrera Velutini. Her father was indicted in 2022 for allegedly helping finance a Puerto Rican governor's campaign in exchange for getting rid of a regulator investigating his bank.

Following Trump's 2024 presidential campaign victory, the Post’s expose revealed that Isabela Herrera gave $3.5 million to a Trump-aligned political committee. In September 2025, she also pledged $2.5 million to the ballroom fund and paid the first installment of $835,000 the following month.

Shortly after the donation, in August 2025, prosecutors had reduced her father's bribery case charges to a misdemeanor through a plea deal. Trump then pardoned him in January 2026, four months after his daughter's ballroom donor pledge.

The reporting does not establish a specific link to the ballroom donation influencing the pardon.

Apple and Nvidia each committed $25 million, as did billionaire Charles Ergen and the Adelson family. Nvidia sought anonymity for its contribution, even though it publicly supported the project.

Ergen put up his $25 million once federal regulators had closed an inquiry into his firm, the telecommunications company EchoStar. In the case of Rocket Companies, a subsidiary put forward a $10 million pledge some weeks after one of its big acquisitions was given the nod by a federal agency, per the documents. Rocket has said there is no link between the gift and the government’s sanction.

The Post found that about half of the funds raised come from companies or executives tied to federal contracts during Trump's second term.

White House spokesman Davis Ingle defended the donors and said the administration would hunt down the leakers. He described allegations of conflicts of interest as baseless and added that the contributors are “a wide array of great American companies and generous individuals.”

Despite Trump’s claim that he will also help fund the project, his name did not appear on the list.

The $333 million in pledges is far below his initial target of $400 million. Furthermore, the cost of building the larger East Wing project has soared to $600 million.

The prank that started Trump’s decades-long 'short-fingered' feud

Spy magazine has returned for at least October, reprinting some of its early Substack issues that feature now-President Donald Trump. That latest example talks about the "body double" that Trump wanted the magazine to use.

The satirical monthly magazine shuttered in 1998

One conversation creators Graydon Carter and Kurt Anderson recalled was Trump's tiny hands.

"Graydon said, ‘This guy, Donald Trump,’ — whom we’d barely heard of — ‘for a tall guy, he has the shortest fingers I’ve ever seen,’” Anderson recalled when speaking to the New York Times earlier this month about the reprinting.

That factoid could explain the post on Thursday from Spy featuring the April 1988 cover about “heck of a guy” Donald Trump. It was Trump's first appearance on the cover of Spy the Substack explained. Trump was on the "Nice" issue of the satirical magazine.

"His body double was a Spy co-founder, which explains the normal-length fingers," the Substack recalled.

"The same issue’s Party Poop feature captured Trump at a society dinner where he seemed to be practicing the alert pose that he has more recently made famous at the World Cup, Lindsey Graham’s funeral and innumerable cabinet meetings," the Substack continued, recalling the photos.

A slumped Trump, then 41, was in a tuxedo with pants hiked up over his stomach. He held a cloth napkin in his left hand like a hot dog and appeared to reach for something in his right pocket.

The caption reads, "Donald Trump demonstrates the fine posture and sparkling joie de vivre of the high-class, swanky real estate mogul he is."

The magazine became known for skewering the New York elites and was the one behind the mockery of Trump as a "short-fingered vulgarian."

Carter is the reporter who, for years, received photos of Trump with his hands circled with a gold Sharpie. Trump evidently felt that his hands looked normally sized in the photos. It has become a running joke about Trump through the years, long before bruises began appearing on top of his hands and he started using makeup to cover it up.

In 2016, then-Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) mocked Trump's "small hands" during a GOP debate. It triggered Trump to such a degree he began talking about the size of his manhood from the debate stage. From then on, Trump called him "Little Marco" and repeatedly showed off his hand size.

Using a handprint in concrete of Trump, The Hollywood Reporter made a template that allows folks print a life-size outline of Trump's hands to compare with their own.

Trump's white refugee obsession runs into an awkward problem

President Donald Trump’s effort to rescue white South Africans from an imaginary genocide has a problem: they don't seem particularly eager to flee it, even with a straight ticket to America up for grabs.

In what appears to be a desperate attempt, State Department officials are considering spending about $335,000 to advertise the program and find out why they aren't interested, according to an internal proposal obtained by The Guardian.

The report reveals that applications from Afrikaners have “trended lower than expected” since the administration made it easy with an online registration launched in November 2025. Officials acknowledge they have no idea what is keeping them away from flying over.

“There’s currently little research about why Afrikaners are not applying to request referral into the US Refugee Admissions Program,” the proposal reads.

The research and advertising campaign is set to come in three stages. The first phase is to organize focus groups in several South African communities, including Pretoria, Stellenbosch and Orania, which garnered headlines as the nation’s ‘White Only’ community.

A survey of 1,000 Afrikaners would follow, testing what messages could persuade them to migrate. The final phase would be a six-month online campaign, primarily in Afrikaans, aimed at convincing people to immigrate.

The campaign plan is still just a proposal and has not been approved.

With an executive order in February 2025, Trump put the resettlement of Afrikaners at the top of his agenda. He did so on the grounds that white South Africans are being subjected to unfair property seizures and race discrimination.

The administration has been vocal in its promotion of “white genocide” talk as well, even though such claims have been roundly discredited by experts and denied outright by the government in South Africa.

South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola used Trump’s favorite term when describing the genocide allegations.

“The story of white genocide does not exist, it’s fake news,” Lamola said during a discussion in New York, adding that there is no evidence to back the White House claims.

Trump drastically cut Biden’s refugee admission cap from 125,000 to 7,500. He eventually increased it to 17,000 with Afrikaners in mind.

According to figures cited by The Guardian, the United States admitted 16,292 refugees in the fiscal year ending September 30, with nearly all being South African. That total, however, has not eased officials’ disappointment with how many are seeking to enter the program.

A State Department spokesperson defended the administration’s approach in a statement:
“We continue to process and admit as refugees Afrikaners in South Africa who are escaping the threat of government-sponsored race-based discrimination”.

“President Trump has been very clear that we are prioritizing the resettlement of Afrikaners in South Africa who are escaping government-sponsored race-based discrimination.”

Trump has had a difficult relationship with South Africa's president, Cyril Ramaphosa. Last year, when visiting the White House, Trump presented Ramaphosa with "evidence" of the mass killing of white South Africans, with pictures of burial sites, which were, in fact, showing humanitarian workers lifting body bags in Goma, Congo.

Report suggests a single factor may have driven recent Trump firings

Former U.S. ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle’s reported forced resignation is the latest high-profile departure from the Trump administration’s second term. According to a New York Times report, her ouster reflects a trend: women account for the vast majority of officials fired under President Donald Trump’s leadership.

Earlier this year, four of Trump’s eight female cabinet-level officials resigned or were fired over the span of three months, and all were replaced by men. As widely reported, Guilfoyle was asked to resign amid allegations of misconduct after The Wall Street Journal reported that she asked a donor to pay her $100,000 American Express bill in exchange for giving him access to high-ranking administration officials. Guilfoyle denies the claims, reportedly telling Trump and co. that the leaked texts are AI-generated, and vows to defend her name. Trump immediately distanced himself from Guilfoyle despite her praise of him in her resignation speech, likening her to a mere associate, though she was previously engaged to his son, Donald Trump Jr.

The report notes that the women who were ousted had seemingly demonstrated some form of personal or professional disloyalty to Trump, suggesting that sexism may not be the only factor at play. Retaliation may also be a factor.

Attorney General Pam Bondi reportedly came under fire internally for her strategy in handling the Epstein files leak, which Trump reportedly found unsatisfactory. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was the first cabinet-level departure of his second term. Her ousting came after she testified before Congress that Trump had approved millions of dollars for government advertising, a claim he denied.

Men are not immune to being ousted under the Trump administration, but women appear to face quicker and harsher consequences. Trump’s appointed FBI director Kash Patel has a growing list of misconduct allegations, including drinking on the job, assigning a SWAT team to protect his girlfriend, and using a government plane for personal trips. He’s denied the claims but remains in his position, and Trump has continued to publicly express strong support for Patel, calling him a great asset, even when the public ridiculed Patel for his handling of Charlie Kirk’s assassination.

Some have spoken out on Trump’s allegiance to the men in his administration. Following the exits of Bondi and Noem, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Democrat of New York, asked: “Is he [Trump] out of women?” Trump only seems to have the capability to fire female secretaries.” Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett wrote on social media: “He will throw the incompetent women under the bus a lot faster than the incompetent men.”

In response to the NY Times’ story, Taylor Rogers, a White House spokeswoman, said: “President Trump has assembled the greatest administration in history, selecting each member of his incredible team based on one criterion: their ability to deliver for the American people. Unlike the identity politics-obsessed Democrats, the president judges individuals on merit and qualifications, not immutable characteristics.

Ex-GOP official says Trump has entered MAGA's 'fat Elvis' period

President Donald Trump and his MAGA movement have entered what one former Republican official has described as their "fat Elvis" era, as his campaign tactics and recycled attacks are wearing thin with some Republican voters who feel the president is past his prime.

Tara Setmayer, a former Republican communications director on Capitol Hill, delivered her verdict in a Thursday interview with The Guardian, arguing that the conspiracy theories and cheap attacks and high school nicknames have run their course and are no longer resonating with voters facing the reality of high living costs

Setmayer said Trump's political playbook has become predictable, describing his movement as the "fat Elvis period of the MAGA election campaign tactics."

The comparison suggests the movement is continuing its most successful hits long after those tactics have stopped working.

The article also touches on the embarrassing misinformation campaign targeting Democrat James Talarico, who is too close to comfort to potentially win the Senate seat in Texas for the GOP.

The controversy began when Talarico disappeared from the campaign trail for nine days to recover from the flu. His absence turned into a weird conspiracy theory that he had checked into a mental health facility after suffering a mental breakdown.

Many MAGA allies, including former Trump strategist Steve Bannon, helped amplify the rumors when former GOP fundraiser Caroline Wren appeared on his War Room podcast and repeated claims that Talarico had entered a psychiatric facility.

Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton, who is Talarico’s opponent, also joined the attacks, posting a mock wanted poster questioning Talarico's whereabouts.

Trump himself mocked Talarico during an October 7 rally in San Antonio, baselessly suggesting the Democrat had become sick after being forced to eat meat despite supposedly being vegan.

Conservative social media influencer Nick Sorter shared a 47-second audio clip on X that he said proved that Talarico had been discharged from a mental health treatment center in Mason, Ohio. In the clip, a woman Sorter claimed was an employee appeared to say Talarico “was just discharged this evening.”

The Bulwark later exposed the hoax after obtaining the full recording, which contradicted the influencer's account.

The facility also publicly confirmed that Talarico had never received treatment there, and he confirmed that he had never even been to Ohio before.

Setmayer used the Talarico hit job as an example of the conspiracy tactics that no longer move voters.

"The voters have become hip to this game," she said, adding that everyday Americans are preoccupied with dealing with the consequences of Trump’s failed policies.

Reed Galen, a former Republican strategist and cofounder of the Lincoln Project, said of the Talarico fiasco that the case was a reminder of how effective the Russian disinformation machines could be.

Galen argued that the mere fact that it was amplified without any evidence and became an issue in the Texas Senate campaign proved its effectiveness.

Former Trump pal thinks he wants to lose so he can play the victim

One time, Donald Trump friend Donny Deutsch thinks the president wants to lose the election so he can play the victim.

Speaking on "Morning Joe" Thursday, Deutsch said Trump is always happier when he punches back.

Mika Brzezinski rattled off recent numbers from a Fox poll, which has a different standard than the news side. Things continue to collapse around Trump. The most startling number shows that just 18 percent say that their family is "better off" today than two years ago.

"That's the worst number I've ever seen. Ever. The worst number," Joe Scarborough said.

"Eighteen percent, Joe, you were talking about the two seats before. You were talking about corruption and costs. I'll add chaos into that. I can never remember seeing numbers — I've been doing the show for 19 years. I can never remember seeing an election cycle where everything, everything was lining up just so negatively," said Deutsch. "Like, you just, everybody talked about a blue wave. I can't see how it's not a tsunami. I can't see with three weeks away, obviously nothing's going to change dramatically in the next few weeks. And you just go everything you talk about, even Trump people I talk to, they've had it."

Commentator Mike Barnicle said one of the most difficult things about the year is that as soon as a lawmaker is elected, they have to start raising money for reelection immediately. It means the focus has shifted from serving constituents and legislating to reelection.

Semafor reporter Ben Smith said he found that most new members of Congress are more interested in being content creators than in doing the work of the people.

Deutsch cited a recent comment from former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who thinks Trump wants to lose the election.

"I think on some level, [Trump] wants the Dems to win so he can be the victim, so he can play that guy. He can say, look, I wasn't on the ballot. That's why you lost and be the guy who's counterpunching [and] counterpunching. He's comfortable in that position. I just don't think he cares."

Scarborough agreed, noting that Trump is "much better being the politically hunted than being the hunter. He's much better. He likes it. Playing defense. Doing the rope-a-dope."

Longtime Democratic strategist James Carville said last week that he agrees with the assessment that Trump may very well be trying to lose.

Speaking to The Hill, Carville said, “I mean, there’s nothing that he does that’s consistent with trying to win, and [there’s] probably not much he can do. He is the central issue in the campaign, he dominates everything. But I got to keep asking: Is he trying to do this? Does he just want to screw the congressional Republicans? Does he hate them?”


- YouTube youtu.be

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.