Search results for "renee nicole good"

Getting justice for Renee Nicole Good won't be easy — but it can happen

There’s something we need to talk about before talking about anything else related to Renee Nicole Good’s murder.

The likelihood of convicting her killer is very low.

No matter how damning you may think the video evidence is – and it is damning – Jonathan Ross, the ICE officer who shot Renee Nicole Good in the face, is still a cop.

Put that with another fact – this is America. Together, they paint a picture of the difficulty of bringing him to justice. Ross is a cop. America reveres cops. Convicting a cop of any wrongdoing, much less murder, is an enormous task.

“It’s like trying to convict Jesus,” Ken White said.

“If you think it is obvious that the videos prove murder and nobody can say otherwise, your view is based on how you want the system to be, not how it is,” he said. “It will be brutally hard, fighting inch by inch against what America is, to convict Jonathan Ross. Your feelings don’t enter into it.”

And that’s under normal circumstances.

These circumstances are not normal.

First, Ross fled the scene of the crime. Second, the FBI barred state investigators from accessing evidence. Third, there have been reports of federal agents entering the home of Jonathan Ross, in greater Minneapolis, and removing stuff. Fourth, the US Department of Homeland Security has “shadow units” dedicated to destroying evidence of crimes committed by immigration officials.

That’s on top of relentless and malicious lying. As Stephen Colbert said, the message is only the administration has the authority to determine the truth. Well, it’s also going to try making sure there’s no evidence to prove them wrong.

Oh, and then there’s the misdirection.

That’s the point of the video of the shooting taken by Ross that he appears to have released to Alpha News. (See above.) Apparently, Ross believed it would show that he was forced to kill Good in self-defense. What it actually does is reinforce conclusions drawn from analyzing the original videos, including this key detail flagged by the Post: “Ross crosses in front of the vehicle as it moves in reverse.”

From there, he took a stance, aimed and fired.

I don’t mean to be cynical. My intent is to be realistic. This is the country we have. Accountability for Jonathan Ross is going to be as difficult as accountability for the man at the top, Donald Trump, who set this crime wave in motion.

That doesn’t mean good people shouldn’t try. Local prosecutors, though at a disadvantage without the aid and cooperation of the FBI, still opened an inquiry Friday, asking the wider public for any evidence it might have.

Meanwhile, back in Washington, moderate Democrats are experiencing something rare: a spine. Some are moving toward impeaching Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem. (Hakeem Jeffries called her “a stone-cold liar.” He did not endorse impeachment, but notably did not rule it out.) Others have raised the question of whether they’ll vote to fund ICE. On the margins are those wanting to abolish it.

For everyone else, there’s democratic politics. The most important thing right now is gathering and disseminating video evidence of abuses of power by ICE for the purpose of discrediting not only Trump but all federal authorities.

That won’t be hard, and not only because everyone has a smart phone. According to an editor at the Star-Tribune, locals feel like they’re under siege. “Not an exaggeration at all to say that the feeling in Minneapolis is that the entire metro area is being treated as occupied territory by federal agents. Impossible to overstate how overwhelmingly people here do not like it. This does not feel sustainable.”

Indeed, something seems to be shifting.

Whereas the murder of George Floyd, a Black man, took weeks to grow into a national narrative, the murder of Renee Nicole Good, a widowed, white and blond-haired mother of three, who had stuffed animals in the glove box, whose wife wailed in despair and whose dog needed its leash, has triggered a virtually instantaneous backlash.

America is still a majority white country and a lot of those white people, especially white women, are apparently seeing themselves in Renee Nicole Good. It’s to the point that even respectable, middle-class white people are asking themselves if their local cops are going to protect them against ICE or if they’re going to take Donald Trump’s side.

Those doubts and fears are deepened every time ICE is captured on video showing Americans what it believes is the true meaning of law and order: Comply or die.

Indeed, ICE officers appear to believe altogether that that’s the lesson it was teaching the American people with the murder of Renee Nicole Good – we can do whatever we want, to whomever we want, and the moment you object, we can deem you a criminal who’s deserving of whatever punishment we deem appropriate at that moment.

As this ICE officer tells a woman who is filming him:

“Have you not learned?”

(Then he grabs the woman’s phone.)

My point here is not to be cynical of the likelihood of Ross seeing justice. That could happen, but only if state prosecutors are careful and only if they are lucky. This is still America, even if many of us no longer recognize it.

My point is expanding the idea of accountability so that failure in one area doesn’t seem like failure everywhere. Obviously, it would be better if Renee Nicole Good were alive, but in death, she might finally show people who didn’t believe it, or were focused on their wallets, that Trump is an evil man, and that other evil men are drawn to him.

Evil might be the most important thing to emerge from the video that Ross leaked to Alpha News. In it, Renee Nicole Good can be heard saying to him: “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.” Seconds later, after he shoots her in the face three times, Ross can be heard saying: “F------ B----.”

'You killed Americans!' Dems shout down Trump during State of the Union

President Donald Trump's speech turned into a shooting match with lawmakers during the State of the Union on Tuesday.

In a comment about ending "sanctuary cities," Trump attacked those who are protecting migrants.

Trump commented, "You should be ashamed of yourself!"

You have killed Americans! You should be ashamed!" Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) shouted.

"We saw the videos too... you are killing Americans," Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) followed.

Rep. Norma Torres (D-Calf.) held up a sign featuring Renee Nicole Good and Alex Jeffrey Pretti's faces. Both were shot and killed by federal agents in Minneapolis during his mass deportation campaign.

Federal agents secretly tear apart Trump officials in documentary videos

An independent journalist has been letting federal agents speak anonymously so they can trash the higher-ups without fear of retribution.

Karl Loftus spoke with WIRED about his project in Minneapolis under @deadcrab_films that aims to capture the moment in history of federal agents as they carry out President Donald Trump's mass deportation plans.

One agent bashed outgoing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as nothing more than a "DEI" hire, a reference to "diversity, equality and inclusion," which conservatives have warred against.

A Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) filmed a confession where they "expressed concerns about DHS colleagues violating the law, and complained of having to pause investigation into child sexual abuse cases to focus on immigration work," the report said.

“If they gave child exploitation cases a fraction of the attention, funding, resources, personnel, analytical support, etc. that they’re now giving immigration enforcement, we could do so much good,” the investigator said.

Loftus said he's never done any immigration reporting before and simply happened to be visiting family in Wisconsin when the shooting of Renee Nicole Good unfolded. He went to Minneapolis. After filming the protests, he asked his large following of military veterans about one of the first cell phone videos uploaded of the shooting of Good.

“Hey, any of the veterans out there that follow my page, I want to know your opinion on this. Watch the video, what do you think? Was this wrong, was this just? What would you have done in this scenario?” the prompt asked.

He then got connected through a network of federal agents that work for HSI, Customs and Border Protection as well as Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"I was like, 'Man, no one has interviewed ICE agents. I don't know how exactly I would pull it off, but it would be interesting,'" he said.

The reality, however, is that federal agents won't speak out frankly with a reporter. "They will be fired instantly," said Loftus.

He has inside the agency that can confirm whether the person is who they say they are. If there is a question about the authenticity, the inside source gives them a question only someone in that specific agency would know.

The response from even ICE critics has been that it's "eye-opening." Those for and against the immigration crackdown are mostly saying the same things.

"I think eventually I'm going to get subpoenaed by the DHS," the reporter said. He assumes that DHS will eventually tell agents to stop doing the interviews, but it hasn't happened yet.

"These people have confided a lot of really sensitive information with me, so I don’t worry they’ll dox me or something, but you hear all these things about the DHS subpoenaing people's Instagrams, so that could be a real concern," Loftus closed. "But some of the HSI agents have really helped me on my opsec [Operations Security]."

Embattled Kristi Noem to face 'tough questions' about 'turbulent' reign at DHS

On December 11, 2025, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was aggressively grilled by Democrats during a House Homeland Security Committee hearing. And this Tuesday, March 3, Noem will testify before Congress once again — this time, in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

The New York Times' Madeleine Ngo notes that the March 3 hearing comes "during a more turbulent time" at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

"The last time Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, testified before Congress in December," Ngo explains, "her department had just begun an aggressive immigration enforcement operation in Minnesota…. When she testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, she is likely to face questions about how the department's shutdown is affecting its work to detect and thwart terrorist threats after the U.S. assault on Iran. She is also expected to face sharp scrutiny over her department's handling of high-profile immigration operations in Minnesota, where outrage flowed after federal agents fatally shot two U.S. citizens, and some immigrants in the country lawfully were swept up."

The Senate Judiciary hearing is generating a lot of discussion on X, formerly Twitter.

Sen. Adam Schiff (D-California) tweeted, "Under Kristi Noem's leadership, DHS has been out of control. With ICE terrorizing our communities. Masked agents seizing and killing American citizens…. Sec. Noem appears before the Senate. I have questions. Lots of them."

Journalist Paolo Jorge noted that the March 3 hearing follows the fatal shootings of Minneapolis residents Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti during immigration raids in their city.

Jorge posted, "DHS SEC KRISTI NOEM TODAY BEFORE SENATE JUDICIARY Committee for an oversight hearing after 9:00am FACING TOUGH QUESTIONS MAINLY REGARDING MINNESOTA First time since the two deaths in Minneapolis Ultimately impeachment idea could return from Dems but also from some GOP. PJ."

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) commented, "Unless Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is fired, Chairman Jim Jordan should immediately begin Judiciary Committee impeachment proceedings against her. And if he doesn't, Democrats will launch our own impeachment inquiry into the shocking constitutional crimes and corruption defining her tenure."

Texas-based author Brittany Belle wrote, "A federal judge has BLOCKED Kristi Noem’s attempt to stop Members of Congress from accessing ICE detention facilities. You don't get to run secret detention centers in America, Kristi."

'Stunning and extremely rare' to see DOJ course reversal on shooting deaths: prosecutor

Former federal prosecutor Alyse Adamson, host of the "At Lyse You Heard It Here" podcast, spoke to CNN about the Justice Department deciding to take action against federal agents involved in the shooting deaths of two people in Minnesota this year.

Adamson called the decision a "course reversal" that she found "stunning and extremely rare."

"I just want to also point out that this case, DOJ, moved to have the case against the two men dismissed with prejudice. You just don't see that," she explained. "And when you are hearing prosecutors say that the statements of these ICE agents or of these federal officers, rather, was materially inconsistent, that is significant legal language."

She said the legal translation is that their facts simply don't align. So, the new investigations that have been opened are more significant.

"The allegations or the claims of potential false statements under oath could potentially support a perjury charge," she said. "So we are looking at a very, very serious situation for these officers, Pamela."

Host Pamela Brown mentioned the ongoing work by the Department of Homeland Security to undermine eyewitness accounts and videos of incidents by spinning its own story about what happened. Those stories turned out to be false, evidence from inside DHS showed.

As an illustration, CNN played a clip of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who claimed in a press conference that Renee Nicole Good attempted to "weaponize her vehicle" and attempt to run over an officer. President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that Good did run over that officer.

Brown also noted recent rulings from judges saying that these accounts from DHS appear not to be credible.

"How much does this hurt the Trump administration's not only credibility, but push for immigration reform?" she asked.

Adamson said, "Public trust depends on accuracy and credibility. And part of a judge's job as a neutral arbiter of the law is to assess credibility."

Korn drummer rips GOP 'cult' for enabling Trump — 'a declining man surrounded by cowards'

Defending the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Minneapolis, President Donald Trump argued that the operation is, on the whole, going smoothly. Trump, referencing the fatal shootings of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, seemed to be arguing that "two people out of tens of thousands" being killed is a good track record for an operation of that size.

But veteran rock drummer Michael Jochum, known for his work with the rap-metal/alternative metal band Korn, offered a scathing response to those comments in a post on Facebook.

"Watching Donald Trump speak now feels less like observing a president and more like standing too close to a malfunctioning machine that no one is brave enough to shut off," Jochum posted. "This week, during an NBC interview meant to address the execution of two American citizens by agents of the state, Trump didn't express grief, remorse, or even basic human concern. Instead, he whined about 'bad publicity.' Not the deaths. Not the families. The optics."

Jochum continued, "'Two people out of tens of thousands,' he sneered, waving away murdered Americans as rounding errors. Tens of thousands of what, exactly? Deportations? Arrests? Human beings reduced to a spreadsheet he can't even read anymore…. This isn't just cruelty anymore. It's cognitive decay wrapped in authoritarian indifference. Trump no longer even pretends to care who gets hurt as long as he can claim a win, any win, real or imagined. His mind has become a junk drawer of half-remembered slogans, violent impulses, and delusions of competence. The cruelty is instinctual now. The confusion is constant."

The drummer went on to lambast Republicans who continue to defend him.

The most "damning part," he lamented, is that Trump is "still propped up by a Republican Party that knows exactly what it’s doing."

"They don't misunderstand him," Jochum said of Republicans. "They enable him. They translate the babble into policy, the lies into laws, the violence into press releases.

Then there’s the cult. The sheep. The ones who stare at this unraveling and call it 'strength'…. Who excuse murder as necessary, confusion as genius, cruelty as patriotism."

Jochum continued, "This is not loyalty, it's surrender. A mass abdication of moral responsibility in exchange for grievance cosplay…. What remains is a dangerous, declining man surrounded by cowards and worshippers, all pretending this collapse is normal. It isn't. And the longer they pretend, the more blood ends up on all of their hands."

Growing tensions signal Trump moving closer to 'martial law': analysis

The fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good by a U.S. Customs and Enforcement (ICE) agent in Minneapolis was followed by large protests all over the United States, from Portland, Oregon to Philadelphia (where a crowd of demonstrators gathering outside City Hall).

Allies of President Donald Trump are aggressively defending the agent and claiming that he acted in self-defense, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance. Noem even described Good as a "domestic terrorist." But many others on both the left and the right are attacking the shooting as excessive force, and former Judge Andrew Napolitano — a right-wing libertarian/conservative legal analyst for Newsmax — believes that the agent should face criminal charges.

Good's death came four days after U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and transported him to a federal detention center in New York City. And Salon's Brian Karem, in an article published on January 9, draws a parallel between the two events — both of which, Karem argues, show that Trump is feeling increasingly emboldened.

"(Trump) Administration officials used nearly the same language in describing Renee Nicole Good as they did the alleged narco-terrorists," Karem notes. "Trump said she was 'very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self-defense.' He also blamed the death on the 'Radical Left' and said they are 'threatening, assaulting and targeting our Law Enforcement Officers and ICE Agents on a daily basis.'"

Karem fears that Trump will use the outrage following Good's death as a pretext to impose martial law and cancel the 2026 midterms.

"Trump is hell-bent, along with those who work for him, on total control," Karem warns. "Good's death is likely to foment more anger and hatred, both of which Trump bathes in. Should something nasty befall ICE officers, Trump would gladly declare martial law. And speculation is rife that he could cancel the midterm elections — since he's scared to death he’ll be impeached should the Democrats regain control of Congress in November…. Renee Nicole Good is an example of how Trump villainizes American citizens. Maduro shows how Trump exploits the villainy of other villains. The oil tankers are symbolic of his greed and reality-show tendencies."

Karem adds, "All three of these examples show that the consequences of Trump are very real and increasingly acute. At this point, they are painfully and terrifyingly obvious. Be prepared for martial law."

Brian Karem's full article for Salon is available at this link.

Court system 'chaos' as judges say Trump officials make it hard to 'keep up with it all'

After targeting Los Angeles and Chicago for militarized immigration raids, the Trump administration carried out an even more draconian strategy in Minneapolis — where two U.S. citizens, Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, were fatally shot (Good by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jonathan Ross, Pretti by Border Patrol agents). The Trump administration defended the shootings, while critics argue that Good and Pretti would still be alive had the officers not used excessive force.

In an article published on February 5, New York Times reporters Alan Feuer, Mattathias Schwartz and Zach Montague emphasize that courts in Minnesota are being overwhelmed by the Trump administration's immigration policies.

The journalists explain, "The turmoil in the courts has demoralized prosecutors, outraged judges, exhausted defense lawyers — and left many immigrants languishing in detention in violation of court orders…. Last week, Patrick J. Schiltz, the chief federal judge in Minnesota, excoriated the (Trump) administration for what he said were nearly 100 violations of court orders stemming from the Homeland Security Department's aggressive crackdown in Minneapolis, which has led to the fatal shootings of two protesters at the hands of federal agents. But a growing chorus of judges around the country have also raised concerns about the wave of cases brought on by the government's immigration raids."

According to Feuer, Schwartz and Montague, the "situation has been particularly acute in Minnesota" because "hundreds of immigrants have been arrested in recent weeks."

"Paschal O. Nwokocha, an immigration lawyer in the state, said he and his staff had fought for weeks to keep track of their clients, refreshing an ICE detainee tracker for updates on their whereabouts," the Times journalists report. "In one instance, he watched a client sent to El Paso via Torrance County, NM, after a judge had ordered his release and return to Minnesota. After the man was returned more than a week later, Judge John R. Tunheim noted that the government had 'willfully violated the court's orders' in failing to send the man back to Minnesota in time for a hearing."

"Judge Blackwell blamed overreach by the Trump administration for this chaos and confusion, saying that officials had failed to put enough legal 'infrastructure' in place to 'keep up with it all,'" the Times reports.

Feuer, Schwartz and Montague report, "When agencies like the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement ignore judicial orders to release immigrants under their control, Judge Blackwell said, it is an affront not merely to personal liberty, but to the entire criminal justice system."

More resignations expected in Minnesota US Attorney’s office

Thus far, six Justice Department prosecutors resigned in the wake of the decision to go after the family of slain Minneapolis mom, Renee Nicole Good. Now it appears more might be forthcoming.

Of the six prosecutors who quit, three were with the U.S. Attorney's Office in Minnesota. The office has been overwhelmed with cases while ICE continues to arrest Americans and take undocumented immigrants into custody.

Mother Jones reported that Minnesota knows more prosecutors will flee.

“I have heard there may be more people leaving, people I would consider senior and respected career prosecutors,” said former acting U.S. attorney Anders Folk.

In an email obtained by the Sahan Journal from Minnesota Federal Defender Katherian Roe, “more resignations are anticipated” at the US Attorney’s Office. “It’s a sign that something is not right,” there. Folk still speaks with old colleagues of the office and is now running for office to become Hennepin County Attorney.

In the mass resignations seen this week, the prosecutors were told to investigate Good's wife for her role in the shooting and many refused.

There were also five resignations this week by those working in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in D.C. The Washington Post reported it was part of a unit that investigated police killings.

In the Minnesota office, there were fewer than 30 prosecutors left, which is less than half of what staffing should be.

Read the full report here.

An overlooked detail in the Renee Good video

A small detail has stayed with me from the video of Renee Nicole Good being shot to death in Minneapolis by ICE officer Jonathan Ross.

In the video, she’s behind the wheel, signaling with her left hand to the driver of an ICE vehicle that she’s letting him go before she goes. Then out of that vehicle come two officers. One goes straight to her door.

“Get the f--- outta the car,” says the officer, who is not Ross.

Then he tries to open her door.

That’s the small detail I’m talking about and here’s the reason it has stayed with me. I have been pulled over a few times in my life – for speeding or turning right on a red light when it should not have. But I cannot recall a time when the police officer tried to open my door.

Forget about swearing at me. That’s never happened either. But no law enforcement officer has communicated to me a hint of physical aggression, even when I deserved it (a story for another time). I don’t mean speaking sternly. I mean with his body – like he intends to hurt me. That’s surely the message received by Renee Nicole Good.

There’s another thing about this detail worth dwelling on.

The fact that I have never experienced a police officer who has communicated to me a hint of physical aggression is due, at least in part, to the fact that I am white. I’m also a man. A white man in a country that was built for white men can live his whole life in blissful ignorance of state violence experienced by nonwhite counterparts.

I bring this up, because I wonder about the role of Renee Nicole Good’s race in her experience of the ICE officer acting like he’s gonna hurt her. As I said, he strides over to her, and tries to open her door. (It’s locked.)

What did she feel? It must have been a shock.

To even the wokest white person, violence by the state is still mostly theoretical. We might believe it’s true. We might trust Black people and other people of color are speaking truthfully about their experience. We might see videos online. But we don’t know what it feels like.

What I’m trying to say is that it makes sense to me if Renee Nicole Good experienced panic on two levels at the same time. Once, because here’s a “cop” trying to open her door, acting like he’s gonna hurt her. Twice, because the abstractions of white power were suddenly real.

I would have panicked, too.

She was right to be afraid. As she focused on the ICE officer cussing her out and trying to open her door, something that I’m pretty sure she had never experienced before, ICE officer Jonathan Ross took a position in front of her car, as she was backing up. Before moving forward, she turned the wheel to the right to avoid him. That’s when Ross crouched, aimed and fired, first through the windshield, then the open window.

Ross’s defenders want us to believe the fear felt by Renee Nicole Good doesn’t count. The only fear that counts is Ross’s. They say he believed she would have killed him. They say he was justified in killing her.

It’s that classic closed-circuit logic.

“It's so f------ convenient that they get to ‘fear for their lives’ anytime they want to absolve themselves of anything,” said writer Luke O’Neil, “and when we actually fear for our lives because of them and do anything a scared person would do it's justification for our death.”

It’s also ridiculous.

“The obvious critique I have not heard explicitly articulated is that the point of making a self-defense argument would be saying ‘but for’ his shooting her, she would have killed him,” said Jonathan Kahn, a law professor at Northeastern. “Clearly, had he not shot her, the outcome for him would have been just the same - ie, no threat to his life.”

The irony is that Renee Nicole Good did not seem afraid of Ross. That’s clear from the video that Ross took during the shooting and that he leaked afterward to a sympathetic media outlet. He released it in the apparent belief that it proves he acted in self-defense. It doesn’t.

In that video, Renee Nicole Good can be seen smiling at Ross. As he’s walking around her car, recording her, taking note of her out-of-state license plate, she tells him: “That’s fine, dude. I’m not mad at you.”

Everything changes when the other ICE officer, who can also be seen in Ross’s video, strides toward her vehicle, tries to open the door, cussing as he orders her to get out. She was evidently sensing danger. Ross was not justified in killing her. But she was justified in trying to get away.

Perhaps the most shocking thing, according to David Lurie, an attorney who writes for Public Notice, is what all this says about dissent.

Ross’s defenders argue that his video proves Renee Nicole Good and her spouse, Rebecca Good, were a threat in that they “were not fans of ICE and were in fact protesting the thugs’ activities,” David told me.

In other words, their dissent was a threat. If Ross and his defenders actually believe that, David told me, “that is also deeply creepy.”

“It is effectively a declaration that dissent merits death.”

Jonathan Ross leaked his video Friday. Afterward, I got in touch with David Lurie to discuss it. Here’s the rest of our conversation.

Jonathan Ross appears to believe that his video absolves him -- that he killed Renee Nicole Good in self-defense. I don't see it. Do you?

First of all, how that video ended up being published is a major issue, which we can discuss. Second, it is not remotely exculpatory – and it takes a truly twisted mind to see it that way.

Why is it a major issue in your view?

It is yet another indication that the FBI investigation is entirely unreliable. The FBI should have control of all of the evidence, including and especially any recordings or other records created by the officers.

And, of course, it should not be releasing those materials piecemeal.

If the officer retains control of the recording, and is engaging in his own publicity campaign, then that necessarily means the FBI is not conducting a professional and reliable investigation.

And if the FBI is itself releasing items of evidence to favored press outlets piecemeal, while freezing out state law enforcement authorities from the investigation, then that is as bad or worse.

You have seen the video. You say it's not exculpatory. Is it damning? It seems to show her steering away from him.

What I focused on is that it confirmed that the victim was – including by her words – trying to deconflict the situation, which is what cops are supposed to do, while it was the ICE thugs who were escalating.

It was chilling.

There’s another disturbing insight.

Apparently, the perpetrator or others in the Trump regime think the video "justifies" the murder, presumably because it shows that the victim and her spouse were not fans of ICE and were in fact protesting the thugs’ activities.

That is also deeply creepy, because it is effectively a declaration that dissent merits death.

That's what I was thinking. If you do not immediately comply, that is justification enough for use of maximum force. And that would be a perversion of law and order, not its preservation. Thoughts?

Agree.

Also, in fact, she was not getting clear instructions from the menacing gang of masked thugs that appeared around her, and to the extent that some of the thugs were demanding to get access to her person, she had every reason not to freely comply.

The fact that the cameraman thug turned out to be a reckless and amoral murderer itself demonstrates that she was rightfully fearful of getting out of her car.

What now? The FBI is blocking state investigators, though local prosecutors are apparently gathering their own evidence.

You are ahead of me on news of the prosecutors, but that does not surprise me. They have the ability to gather a lot of probative evidence without the cooperation of the thugs and their bosses or the FBI.

But it is obviously problematic for state or local authorities to undertake a criminal investigation of the conduct of a federal law enforcement officer while the federal government is actively obstructing the investigation.

Assuming the (clearly wrongful) obstruction of the Minnesota investigation continues, it seems more than likely that the Minnesota authorities will seek judicial intervention to force the feds to give them access to the investigatory materials.

We shall see how that plays out.

If Ross is arrested and there's an indictment and so on, a big if, couldn't the feds just ask a judge to move the case to federal court, where they can have the charges dropped? If so, what then?

There is a lot to be said on that topic. But here are the basics. If there is a criminal case, it will be tried in a federal court, even if it is a state prosecution. Although it seems a bit odd, a state law criminal prosecution of a federal officer for state criminal violations is highly likely to be "removed" to federal court under applicable law.

But if it is removed, it will still be prosecuted by state officials, and state criminal laws will apply to the case, but before there is a trial, there will likely be a "Supremacy Clause immunity" issue to be resolved.

This sounds arcane, but is conceptually simple. While the constitutions define state and the federal governments as "sovereigns," with independent authority to enforce their respective laws, where there is a conflict between state and federal law, under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, federal law prevails.

It follows that if the allegedly criminal conduct of a federal law enforcement officer was consistent with federal law, including governing law enforcement policies, then it is unconstitutional to permit a state law prosecution to proceed.

But it is not going to be enough for the officer to put Kristi Noem in front of the court and for her to make bogus claims about the facts and about federal law enforcement policies. The court will undertake its own independent review of those matters.

Trump showing world 'how to break the United States': conservative

All over the United States — from Los Angeles to Philadelphia to Chicago — large protests are being held following the fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent. The shooting is being condemned as excessive force by everyone from liberal economist Paul Krugman to conservatives and libertarians such as The Lincoln Project's Rick Wilson, MS NOW's Joe Scarborough, The Bulwark's Bill Kristol and former Judge Andrew Napolitano (a legal analyst for Newsmax), while members of the Trump Administration are passionately defending the agent — including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance.

Another right-wing voice condemning ICE and the Trump Administration following Good's death is New York Times columnist David French.

In his January 11 column, French argues that President Donald Trump and his allies have a way of making a crisis worse — and he points to the Good shooting as a prime example. Trump, French warns, "is putting on a clinic about how to break the United States."

"The terrible divisiveness of police violence is why responsible leaders respond to every incident with extreme care," French writes. "You lament the lives lost, you promise a fair and thorough investigation, and you call for calm. You do not prejudge the case…. Even if you follow that playbook perfectly — you say the right words, you do the right things — violence can still erupt. That's how fraught the issue is. But Trump isn't a responsible leader, and he's at his absolute worst in a crisis."

French continues, "He lies. He inflames his base. And — most dangerous of all — he pits the federal government against states and cities, treating them not as partners in constitutional governance but as hostile inferiors that must be brought to heel. That's exactly what has happened in the hours and days since an ICE agent shot and killed Renee Good on the streets of Minneapolis on Wednesday."

The Trump Administration, the conservative columnist laments, is doing nothing to calm tensions following Good's death — but instead, is making a crisis even more dangerous.

"Instantly, the (Trump) Administration's narrative locked in," French observes. "In a Truth Social post published mere hours after Good’s death, Trump said that Good 'violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer, who seems to have shot her in self-defense.' He said that it was 'hard to believe' that the ICE agent, who was recorded walking around after the incident, apparently unharmed, was alive. Statements from senior administration officials were even worse."

French adds, "Kristi Noem, the secretary of homeland security, said that Good committed an act of 'domestic terrorism.' Not to be outdone, Vice President JD Vance called the incident 'classic terrorism.' But if you watch videos of the shooting, one thing is clear: No fair-minded person could watch that incident and conclude that Good was a 'domestic terrorist' on a mission to run down ICE agents. The administration's claims of terrorism are false — absurdly so…. To the worst parts of MAGA — including people who exert immense power over American life — your worth is defined by your obedience. And those who don't obey? Well, they deserve to die, and no one should mourn their death."

David French's full New York Times column is available at this link (subscription required).

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.