Belief

'Truly horrendous': MAGA melts down at 'awful' Pope Leo XIV for denouncing Trump policy

In a rare moment of direct commentary on American politics, Pope Leo XIV ignited a firestorm among conservative Catholics and MAGA-aligned figures after defending Chicago Cardinal Blase Cupich’s decision to honor longtime Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill) — a pro-choice Democrat — for his decades of public service.

Speaking to reporters at the Vatican on Tuesday night, Pope Leo XIV called for a broader, more consistent interpretation of Catholic social teaching, particularly around what it means to be "pro-life."

“I think that is very important to look at the overall work that this Senator has done during, if I'm not mistaken, 40 years of service in the United States Senate,” the pope said.

“I understand the difficulty and the tensions, but I think, as I myself have spoken in the past, it’s important to look at many issues that are related to what is the teaching of the Church," the pontiff said. "Someone who says 'I'm against abortion but I'm in favor of the death penalty' is not really pro-life. So someone who says 'I'm against abortion but I'm in agreement with the inhuman treatment of immigrants who are in the United States' — I don't know if that's pro-life.”

The remarks came just days after Cardinal Cupich announced that Durbin would receive the Archbishop Bernardin Award for Public Witness, praising the Illinois Democrat’s “lifelong commitment to human dignity, social justice and the common good.” The reaction from the MAGA wing of the American Catholic community to Pope Leo XIV's remarks was swift and vitriolic.

Conservative influencers, commentators, and clergy accused both Cupich and Pope Leo XIV of "selling out" the pro-life cause and elevating politics over doctrine.

MAGA filmmaker and anti-DEI advocate Robby Statbuck wrote: “Pope after Pope has been a disappointing profile in cowardice who I just can’t look to as a leader. If Robert Sarah was Pope, this would not happen. Many would come back to the church then. Leo sounds like another Francis.”

Joe Rigney, an associate pastor, wrote: “I know that Protestants are supposed to be sheepish in the face of Catholic social teaching (‘deep in history,’ layers of tradition, antiquity, etc), but when the ‘Vicar’ of Christ and the successor of Peter morally equates abortion, deportations, and the death penalty for heinous crimes, and then proceeds to bless a block of ice in order to save the planet from climate change, I admit to being decidedly unimpressed with the ‘seamless garment.’”

Far-right podcaster and self-described traditional Catholic Matt Walsh wrote: “Really terrible answer from Pope Leo. God Himself prescribes the death penalty in the Bible. Is the Pope saying that God is ‘not pro-life’? And who exactly is advocating for ‘inhumane treatment of immigrants’? What sort of inhumane treatment is he referring to? Deportations? Also, how can he say that ‘nobody has all the truth’ on any of these issues? We know the truth on abortion. It isn't complicated. Awful stuff from the Pope. Truly horrendous on about five different levels.”

He continued: “Even if you disagree with the death penalty, to draw a moral equivalence between executing convicted murders after a fair trial and dismembering children in the womb is moral madness. Reddit-tier nonsense coming from the Pope. Very disturbing.”

Michael Heinlein, a Catholic commentator, wrote: “A terribly unclear question made this all the worse. As Cardinal George used to say ‘don’t tell me how you feel, tell me what you think!’”

Christopher Hale, a former Democratic nominee for Congress, mocked the MAGA backlash and wrote: “Maybe if he said it in Latin while wearing the papal tiara, MAGA would listen to him.”

MAGA tech bros are fueling the evangelical obsession with Armageddon and 'the Antichrist'

Within Christianity, evangelicals and mainline Protestants can have radically different approaches when it comes to the parts of the New Testament that they zero in on.

Mainline Protestants — Lutherans, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, the AME Church —will read the Book of Revelation, but as a rule, they aren't obsessed with it the way that evangelicals are. Evangelicals are often fixated on Armageddon and the End Times, and that includes evangelicals in the tech world.

Many evangelical tech bros, often described as "TheoBros," are aggressive supporters of President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement. And they are much more socially conservative than the right-wing libertarians one finds in the tech field.

In an article published by Wired on September 30, reporter Laura Bullard examines the relationship between tech bros and evangelical Christian fundamentalists.

Bullard asserts that billionaire tech bro and MAGA supporter Peter Thiel's is heavily focused on the Antichrist and Armageddon.

"Peter Thiel's Armageddon speaking tour has — like the world — not ended yet," Bullard explains. "For a full two years now, the billionaire has been on the circuit, spreading his biblically inflected ideas about doomsday through a set of variably and sometimes visibly perplexed interviewers…. Depending on who you are, you may find it hilarious, fascinating, insufferable, or horrifying that one of the world's most powerful men is obsessing over a figure from sermons and horror movies. But the ideas and influences behind these talks are key to understanding how Thiel sees his own massive role in the world — in politics, technology, and the fate of the species."

Bullard notes that "according to some Christian traditions," the Antichrist "is a figure that will unify humanity under one rule before delivering us to the Apocalypse."

"For Thiel," Bullard writes, "its evil is pretty much synonymous with any attempt to unite the world. 'How might such an Antichrist rise to power?' Thiel asked. 'By playing on our fears of technology and seducing us into decadence with the Antichrist's slogan: peace and safety.'"

Read Laura Bullard's full article for Wired at this link.

'How can this horrible tragedy help me?' Latest shooting opens new front in Trump’s 'spiritual war'

Investigators are still scouring the motives that drove Thomas Jacob Sanford to fire on a Mormon church in Michigan, killing four people, but “Daily Blast” podcaster Greg Sargent said President Donald Trump and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt were quick to link the killing to an alleged rash of anti-Christian violence.

“This appears to be yet another targeted attack on Christians,” Leavitt insisted, amplifying an earlier, similar claim by Trump.

This time, their effort to connect the violence to anti-Trump, non-Christian forces backfired as evidence emerged that the shooter may be a Trump supporter motivated by anti-Mormon bigotry.

Christian nationalism, according to host Greg Sargent and author Sarah Posner, may play a crucial factor in the tragedy.

Christian nationalists, Posner observed, consider non-evangelicals impure — and that includes Mormons.

Posner told Sargent, "To jump to the conclusion that he was motivated either by anti-Christian bias or anti-Mormon bias is premature, notwithstanding the evidence that we have that he did say anti-Mormon things to a candidate for political office who had canvassed at his house. The difference between anti-Christian bias and anti-Mormon bias is sort of an interesting one. For the audience that Trump is trying to reach when he claims that something is evidence of anti-Christian bias, that's largely an evangelical audience. It’s also a right-wing Catholic audience."

Posner continued, "But many in the evangelical world, including many Trump supporters, don’t really consider the LDS church to be Christian. They don’t consider Mormons to be Christian, mainly because of their views of the role of the prophet Joseph Smith in the founding of their faith, and of the use of the Book of Mormon in addition to the Old and New Testaments, and other what they would consider to be extra-biblical teachings of the LDS faith."

Sargent and Posner say the administration is working hard to brew up passion among supporters by fomenting animosity at non-Christians.

“His family is cooperating … [to help police] dig in and get to the bottom of why he committed this heinous act of violence,” Leavitt told reporters over the weekend. “And as the president put in his Truth Social post yesterday this looks like another targeted attack on Christians.”

Posner, who covers right-wing thought and tactics, said she wasn’t surprised at the attempted exploitation. The first thing that enters Trump’s mind in most any given situation is how best to exploit it.

“[Trump] sees the world in black and white,” Posner said. “He sees everything as ‘How can this horrible tragedy help me? It can help me because I can frame it as this thing that I know gets my base excited, reminds my base that I’m on their side, that I am their savior and that is here to save them from these evil elements in America that are trying to destroy Christianity in America.’”

Posner said Trump used the same “us vs Them” tactics to exploit the death of MAGA influencer Charlie Kirk. “It’s just more of the same: Trump taking advantage of a horrible tragedy to continue to frame this ‘us vs Them’ mentality.”

Sargent warned that Leavitt’s announcement that the administration was “going to investigate and prosecute these crimes” was highly suggestive language.

“She doesn’t come out and say they’re gonna start using law enforcement to go after people they say are committing anti-Christian crimes but that’s what it sounds like,” Sargent said.

Posner reminded Sargent that Trump promised a task force within the DOJ to combat anti-Christian bias, and has used his avowed crusade against antisemitism to silence freedom of speech on U.S. college campuses, and called it “menacing” to use law enforcement to combat somebody saying something that they think is anti-Christian.

“Remember: they think it’s anti-Christian to disagree with a pastor who’s against same-sex marriage,” Posner said.

“He campaigned on a Christian nationalist platform without outright saying it,” Sargent said. “… [Secretary of Defense] Pete Hegseth said were in a ‘spiritual war.’ Benny Johnson said the Defense Department … is functionally an instrument of God. … Far right influencer Jack Prosobiec called on followers to put on the armor of God and get ready for spiritual warfare.”

Posner pointed out that a lot of their followers “literally think of Democrats and liberals and anyone who disagrees with them as part of a satanic force that’s anti-American,” and that Trump is fomenting their good vs evil, spiritual warfare mindset.

Sargent said Hegseth proclaiming a spiritual war after the death of a very prominent Christian was killed “is highly problematic, particularly when, A) he’s got troops marching into cities, and B) he’s recalling generals from all over the world for some shadowy meeting that’s unknown at this point.”

“Don’t be too naïve about what we’re seeing, is where I’m getting at,” Sargent said.

Hear the podcast at this link.

Trump is 'an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus': GOP speechwriter

The former speechwriter for three Republican presidents and a senior fellow at the non-profit Christian organization The Trinity Forum explains what he calls "fully MAGA-fied Christianity" in his latest piece for The Atlantic.

Peter Wehner, who served under President Ronald Reagan and both Bushes, says that when President Donald Trump admitted at the memorial service of slain MAGA podcaster Charlie Kirk that he hated his enemies, it was hardly a surprise.

"President Trump has in the past made clear his disagreement with, and even his contempt for, some of the core teachings of Jesus. So has his son Don Jr., who told a Turning Point USA gathering in 2021 that turning the other cheek has “gotten us nothing," Wehner says.

Trump has "acknowledged that he’s a man filled with hate and driven by vengeance. It’s not simply that those qualities are part of who he is; it is that he draws strength from the dark passions," he adds.

And despite the fact that Trump has, Wehner explains, "spent nearly every day of the past decade confirming that he lacks empathy. He sees himself as both entitled and as a victim. He’s incapable of remorse. He’s driven by an insatiable need for revenge. And he enjoys inflicting pain on others."

"It’s no longer an interesting question as to why Trump is an almost perfect inversion of the moral teachings of Jesus; the answer can be traced to a damaged, disordered personality that has tragically warped his soul." Wehner says, adding, "What is an interesting question is why those who claim that the greatest desire of their life is to follow Jesus revere such a man and seem willing to follow him, instead, to the ends of the earth."

"Trump and the MAGA movement capitalized on, and then amplified, the problems facing Christian communities, but they did not create them," Wehner explains.

Pastor and author Brian Zahnd posted on Bluesky that “It grieves me to see people I’ve known for years (some as far back as the Jesus Movement of the 1970s) seduced by a mean-spirited culture-war Christianity that is but a perverse caricature of the authentic faith formed around Jesus of Nazareth."

Russell Moore, editor in chief of Christianity Today, has said that Jesus is a “hood ornament” for many American Christians, Wehner writes.

"The expectation of, among others, the Apostle Paul wasn’t human perfection. He believed that original sin touched every human life, and many of his Epistles were written to address serious problems within the Church," he says.

Wehner also points to culture wars as a commonality that draws Christians to Trump.

"Politics, especially culture-war politics, provides many fundamentalists and evangelicals with a sense of community and a common enemy,: Wehner explains. "It gives purpose and meaning to their life, turning them into protagonists in a great drama pitting good against evil. They are vivified by it."

Leaders within the Christian MAGA movement, Wehner adds, are also autocratic and they like what they see with Trump's attempts to consolidate power within the excutive branch.

"Many of the leaders within the Christian-MAGA movement are autocratic, arrogant, and controlling; they lack accountability, demand unquestioned loyalty, and try to intimidate their critics, especially those within their church or denomination," Wehner says.

And as Wehner pointed out, grievance politics also plays a role.

"The grievances and resentment they feel are impossible to overstate; they are suffering from a persecution complex. Fully MAGA-fied Christians view Trump as the “ultimate fighting machine,” in the words of the historian Kristin Kobes Du Mez, and they love him for it."

Why Trump’s MAGA evangelicals are much worse than past 'Christian conservatives'

Liberal Georgia-based journalist Zaid Jilani, who was raised Muslim, has a long history of criticizing the Religious Right. Jilani, back in the 1990s and 2000s, often argued that while there's nothing wrong with faith and religion, "theocracy" has no place in a constitutional democratic republic like the United States.

But in an op-ed published by the New York Times on September 26, Jilani lays out some reasons why he finds 2025's MAGA Christian nationalists much more troubling than the fundamentalist evangelicals he criticized in the past.

"As the George W. Bush years rolled on," Jilani recalls, "I joined my fellow liberal activists in watching documentaries like 'Jesus Camp,' which warned of an impending Christian theocracy. I argued vigorously for separation of church and state, and I waited on pins and needles for the end of a movement I viewed as stifling freedom of religion and freedom of expression. But I'm starting to miss the Christian conservatives I grew up with. Unlike the Christian Right of my childhood, today's variations — some of which see President Trump as a religious figure — seem incapable of being compassionate toward outgroups like mine."

Jilani recalls that after al-Qaeda's 9/11 terrorist attacks, then-President George W. Bush was careful to make a distinction between jihadist and non-jihadist Muslims. Bush described Islam as a "great religion," making it clear that he didn't blame all Muslims for 9/11.

"I think back to the days right after September 11, when Mr. Bush — the politician most closely associated with the 21st-Century Christian Right — visited a mosque in Washington, D.C., to emphasize that Muslims were just as American as anyone else," Jilani explains. "It's easy to laugh this off, given what happened afterward — he set off a bungling war on terrorism that included an unnecessary war in Iraq that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. Yet Mr. Bush set the tone for the millions of devout Christians who voted for him."

MAGA's "Christian nationalism," Jilani laments, "can be distinguished more by cruelty than kindness."

"These new Christian conservatives are represented by people like Matt Walsh, a popular right-wing Catholic commentator," the Georgia-based journalist warns. "Conservatives spent years working across the aisle on criminal justice reform. Mr. Walsh has floated the return of whipping and amputations as punishments and said that by resisting Mr. Trump's militarization of law enforcement in Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson had committed treason and should be 'given the requisite punishment for a capital offense'…. There is no issue where the current crop of Christian Right politicians departs more from the old than immigration."

Zilani, who is Pakistani-American, adds, "Christians like Mr. Bush condemned nativism. These new activists embrace it."

Trump's 'vengeance': Conservative explains why white evangelicals may be drawn to MAGA

During a Sunday, September 21 memorial for Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk in Glendale, Arizona, a speech from his widow, Erika Kirk, was followed by a speech from President Donald Trump — who told attendees that unlike her, "I hate my opponents."

The following day on MSNBC's "Morning Joe," host Joe Scarborough discussed Trump's call for revenge with one of his guests: New York Times columnist and fellow Never Trump conservative David French, who warned that the obsession with revenge is one of the things white evangelical Christians like about Trump.

French told Scarborough, a former GOP congressman, "You have, on the one hand, a church that will rise and rightly applaud the incredible words of Erika Kirk and then turn around and happily go to the polls not in spite of Trump's vengeance, but because of Trump's sense of vengeance….. If you've been paying attention to American religion and American politics over the last decade, it wouldn't surprise you to see that Erika Kirk speech and to hear the applause and then to hear the Donald Trump speech and hear the laughter and applause to that as well — and realize that, in many ways, that is what politics is doing to American Christianity."

French continued, "It is creating this face of vengeance. Because Americans know he has the power to work his vengeance because of the church. It is the church that put him into office — the evangelical church — more than any other American constituency. And so, what we watched unfold in front of us — when he spoke like that, this wasn't in contradiction of what so many Christians wanted out of their president here. It is exactly why so many Christians voted for this president…. That is the frustrating complexity of what is happening in this moment."

Scarborough, who was raised Baptist in the South, argued that the vengeance theme of Trump's speech was a major contrast to what former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California) — a vehement critic of Trump — said about the U.S. president.

Scarborough told French, "This takes me back to practicing Catholic Nancy Pelosi saying that she prayed for Donald Trump every day. As Jesus commanded us in Matthew 5, you love your enemies. You pray for those who persecute you."

'I hate my opponents': Trump at Charlie Kirk memorial www.youtube.com

'Blood of the martyrs': These extremists view Kirk murder as call to 'holy war'

Far-right MAGA pundit Candace Owens is claiming that Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk was getting ready to convert to Catholicism near the end of his life, but evangelical Christian fundamentalists are denying that claim. And reporters Sam Stein and Will Sommer appeared skeptical about that alleged conversion during a conversation for the conservative website The Bulwark.

Kirk, who was 31 when he was fatally shot in Utah, was closely identified with evangelical Christian nationalism. And The Guardian's J. Oliver Conroy, in an article published on September 20, reports that Christian nationalists are "positioning Charlie Kirk as a martyr for their movement."

After Kirk's murder, his widow, Erika Kirk, posted, on Instagram, that the "world is evil" and declared, "They have no idea what they just ignited within this wife."

Author Jeff Sharlet, known for his writings on Christian nationalism, discussed Erika Kirk's comments with The Guardian — warning, "That's holy war, that's accelerationism, and it's incredibly powerful."

Conroy notes some of the other things far-right Christian nationalists have been saying since Kirk's death.

In a video, megachurch pastor Matt Tuggle said of Kirk's murder, "If your pastor isn't telling you the left believes (in an) evil demonic belief system, you are in the wrong church."

Sean Feucht, a Christian nationalist pastor who worked with Kirk, said, "We know that the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church. The devil is not gonna win. The forces want us to be silent; they want us to shut up.… We need to be more bold."

Conroy describes Christian nationalism as "the belief that the U.S. is and should be an explicitly Christian nation."

"Kirk had been an evangelical Christian since childhood but earlier in his career, expressed reluctance at politicizing his religious views," Conroy explains. "That changed during the peak of the early pandemic, when Kirk made the acquaintance of several charismatic megachurch pastors protesting church lockdowns. He began to traffic in ideas influenced by the (New Apostolic Reformation), including the seven-mountain mandate. Turning Point USA also began to forge partnerships with churches."

Read J. Oliver Conroy's full article for The Guardian at this link.


'Thousands of Charlie Kirks': 'Martyr for Christ' dominates GOP youth conference

THE WOODLANDS — Thousands gathered Friday night to kick off a conference of young Republicans in which Charlie Kirk, the conservative activist killed last week, was memorialized as a “martyr” whose death is galvanizing youths across the nation.

Speaker after speaker, from state lawmakers to influential MAGA cultural tastemakers, shared stories at the Texas Youth Summit about how Kirk — who began rallying young conservatives as a teenager — made them and others feel like their Christian-guided views mattered and their perspectives were shared by many.

They called him a “hero,” “miracle,” and “martyr for Christ." Amid the mourning, they said that the fight Kirk had embarked on was far from over but one that could be won by the young people in attendance.

And it appeared, according to some of the speakers, that more people were learning Kirk’s name and his vision for a faith-led American future every day since his death.

The speeches caused roars of applause from the mostly young audience, some wearing white t-shirts that said “We are Charlie,” which glowed in front of bright red and blue stage lights.

“Be like Charlie,” Republican U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, the final speaker of the night, told the crowd, which had thinned by the time he took the stage past 10 p.m. but was still several hundred strong. The state’s junior senator recounted how he texted Kirk upon hearing about the shooting, asking if he was OK.

“I’m praying for you right now,” Cruz said he texted, adding: “Obviously, I never got an answer.”

Kirk was killed Sept. 10 while speaking at a Utah university, the first stop of his group’s “The American Comeback” tour. He often debated students who disagreed with him on his tours while firing up young conservatives.

“There's a lot of value in a bunch of young conservatives coming together and (feeling) like they're not alone. Charlie created that environment — single handedly,” U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Houston said in a video that was played. “No one else did that kind of thing.”

The memorial was just the latest instance of Texans gathering to share their sorrow over Kirk’s death. Vigils at college campuses, town squares and churches have drawn thousands, with speakers and attendees saying Kirk changed how they viewed politics, debating and their own beliefs. Others vehemently opposed what Kirk stood for but attended the homages to condemn his killing as an unacceptable act of political violence.

“We weren’t alive for JFK or MLK, and this is the first big assassination,” said Harley Reed, one of more than 1,000 who gathered last week at Texas A&M for one such candlelight vigil. “This is the first big movement, if you will, that we’ve seen interrupted in a way.”

Also grieving publicly are the state’s leaders, including some Republicans who are set to speak at the conference on Saturday. Some have also urged a close examination of reactions to Kirk’s death from educators and students; Gov. Greg Abbott, for one, has called for the expulsion of students who publicly celebrated Kirk’s death, prompting blowback from critics who say such calls run afoul of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

Such scrutiny has done little to slow the momentum that’s erupted among conservative youth who just became old enough to vote or will reach the threshold in time for next year’s midterms.

Turning Point USA, the group Kirk launched as an 18-year-old to organize other young conservatives, said it received an explosion of more than 50,000 requests to establish new chapters at colleges and high schools in the days after its founder’s death.

In Texas, where the GOP has dominated state government for longer than current college-age students have been alive, organizers of this weekend’s youth summit said they anticipated record-breaking attendance after getting an influx of interest leading up to the event.

“Charlie Kirk cannot be replaced,” Christian Collins, the summit’s founder and leader, said Friday night. “But what I will say is, what will happen in this community, and in this country, is thousands of Charlie Kirks will rise up.”

The event was another example of how Kirk’s death has invigorated a growing movement of young conservatives nationwide, and added fuel to efforts from Texas’ GOP leaders to turn the red state an even deeper shade of red.

State GOP leaders and lawmakers have pointed to that outburst of interest and solidarity as evidence of a Christian awakening among the state’s youth that they say will only grow stronger and usher in a new culture in America.

While the state’s leading young Republican organizations were once lukewarm on Trump, the voter bloc they represent proved crucial to Trump’s victory last year throughout the country.

The president has reportedly said that was thanks, in large part, to Kirk’s work.

This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/09/20/texas-youth-summit-republican-charlie-kirk-memorial/.

How a far-right influencer is using religion to plunder Charlie Kirk’s 'legacy'

Many right-wing media figures, from Fox News' Jesse Watters to "War Room" host Steve Bannon, continue to blame liberals and progressives for the murder of MAGA activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk — even though Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and countless other Democrats vehemently condemned the murder in no uncertain times. But among themselves, right-wing media pundits are battling over the role that Kirk played in the MAGA movement.

In a video posted by the conservative website The Bulwark on September 18, two of their writers — Sam Stein and Will Sommer — examined the role religion plays in far-right MAGA influencer Candace Owens' efforts to exploit Kirk's "legacy."

Sommer told Stein, "She puts on a pretty good face about being this, like, aggrieved friend who's going to get to the bottom of this…. The fact is that Charlie Kirk's legacy is a very valuable thing — and in particular, the political capital that can be gained from it, and the money and the donors. And so, I think she is making a claim — and Tucker Carlson — to at least a slice of that legacy."

When Stein noted that "religion gets into this in a really profound way," Sommer elaborated on that point.

Sommer told Stein, "Religion here, I think, is something that is really volatile. And I think for some people in MAGA, what Candace Owens says about Charlie's religion is actually even more important than what she said about him and Israel. Because she says: So, Charlie was an evangelical Christian, and we've seen, in the aftermath of his murder, that there's this sense of, like, people saying, 'There's going to be a religious revival. The pews are going to be packed. Everyone's going to become Christian now.' But Candace says: Well, actually, Charlie…. was on the verge of converting to Catholicism."

Stein asked Sommer if there was "any evidence" of Kirk getting ready to become Catholic — to which he responded, "I believe his wife was originally Catholic, although she said, a year ago, she no longer was."

Trump exploiting Kirk's murder to spread his 'political religion' of division: historian

Last week's murder of MAGA activist Charlie Kirk has prompted President Donald Trump to use him as a "symbol" to promote his own "political religion," according to a historian and journalist.

In a Tuesday essay for Religion News Service (RNS), former Harvard University professor Mark Silk lamented that Trump was using the shocking public killing of Kirk as an excuse to crack down on his ideological opponents, and accused the president of creating a "political religion" centered around hate and division. He contextualized Trump's response to Kirk's murder in former President Abraham Lincoln's reflection that in the wake of tragedies, presidents should speak "with malice toward none, with charity for all ... to bind up the nation’s wounds."

"Trump has, unsurprisingly, done nothing of the sort in this time of crisis, transgressing civil religious norms with utter self-awareness," Silk wrote.

READ MORE: 'Something is wrong': MAGA pundits say Trump is 'lying to us' about Charlie Kirk shooting

In his RNS essay, Silk reminded readers that during an interview with Fox & Friends, Trump passed up an opportunity to be a uniter and instead said he "couldn't care less" about bringing the country together. Silk contrasted Trump's approach with that of Italian historian Emilio Gentile, who said that government should seek to create a "civil religion" that is built on "a plurality of ideas, free competition in the exercise of power and the ability of the governed to dismiss their governments through peaceful and constitutional methods."

"In place of a civil religion that sacralizes the political system to include those with whom we disagree, Trump has embraced a political religion that excludes them — one that, as Gentile put it, 'is intolerant, invasive, and fundamentalist, and ... wishes to permeate every aspect of an individual’s life and of a society’s collective life,'" Silk wrote.

Silk also drew a parallel between Trump's response to Kirk's death with the 1930 death of far-right German paramilitary leader Horst Wessel. After Wessel was shot, his death became a rallying cry for the far-right movement in Germany that led to World War II. Silk worried that Trump's actions were making Charlie Kirk into an American Horst Wessel, to be propagandized for today's far-right movement in the United States.

"Today, the canonization of Charlie Kirk proceeds apace. Tributes to him as a stalwart of free speech rights have come from expected and unexpected quarters, even as some are fired from their jobs for daring to criticize him. There are songs celebrating him as a martyr to a great cause," Silk wrote. "He is fast becoming the Horst Wessel of Trump’s political religion."

READ MORE: 'Increasingly senile wackjob': Expert says Trump too broken to destroy democracy on his own

Click here to read Silk's essay in full.

'Hunt for the Antichrist': How MAGA is making politics a 'zero-sum holy war'

Many Christian nationalists and far-right MAGA Republicans have claimed that "holy war" or "jihad" is a concept that is unique to Islam. But quite a few religious scholars strongly disagree, emphasizing that is nothing inherently violent about either Islam or Christianity — and that an obsession with "holy war" comes from one's interpretation of the religion, not from the religion itself.

In an article published by on September 16, The New Republic's Gil Duran outlines the role that, in 2025, "holy war" is playing in Christian nationalism and the MAGA movement.

"Last week, in the hours after Charlie Kirk's assassination, the words 'demon' and 'evil' trended on X as some on the right portrayed his murder as the work of supernaturally possessed Democrats and leftists," Duran explains. "Major right-wing influencers echoed Carl Schmitt's ideas, calling for a political crackdown on Kirk’s critics. Chris Rufo, a prominent right-wing propagandist, called on law enforcement to 'infiltrate, disrupt, arrest, and incarcerate' the 'radical left.' This is where apocalyptic rhetoric always leads."

READ MORE: 'Something is wrong': MAGA pundits say Trump is 'lying to us' about Charlie Kirk shooting

Duran notes that in Christian fundamentalist and MAGA circles, one is seeing a surge in "devil talk" and fear of The Antichrist.

"Over time, the identity of Satan's Little Helper has shifted from Native Americans to Communists, Hitler and Saddam Hussein and Barack Obama — even barcodes and microchips have been implicated," Duran observes. "From colonial days to the AI era, the hunt for the Antichrist continues. Today's QAnon conspiracy theorists believe they are battling a cabal of cannibalistic Satanists. 'Unhumans,' a 2024 book praised by (Vice President) JD Vance, equated progressives with bloodthirsty 'unhuman' creatures. This turns politics into a zero-sum holy war."

Duran points to tech mogul and billionaire donor Peter Thiel as an example of a prominent figure in MAGA World who is obsessing over The Antichrist. In the past, Thiel was more of a libertarian. But in recent years, he has taken a decidedly MAGA turn.

"Thiel is not a theologian, scholar, or prophet," Duran writes. "So why pay attention to his biblical musings? Because Thiel is one of the world's most influential men, and his Antichrist speeches reveal his deep belief that religion is a weapon for political warfare —and he's right. Thiel's Antichrist fixation fits a long tradition in American politics. Since the nation's founding, Americans have sought to name the Antichrist — usually by pointing the finger at their political enemies."

READ MORE: 'Deeply troubling': Military expert warns Trump is unilaterally 'deciding to kill people'

Duran notes what historian Robert Fuller, author of the 1995 book "Naming the Antichrist: The History of an American Obsession," had to say about that role that "holy war" plays in Christian fundamentalism.

Duran quotes Fuller as saying, "The symbol of the Antichrist has played a surprisingly significant role in shaping Americans' self-understanding. Because they tend to view their nation as uniquely blessed by God, they have been especially prone to demonize their enemies…. Once we label our adversaries in these cosmic terms — all good versus all evil — now, there's going to be no compromise."

READ MORE: 'We don't care': Fox host downplays murder of Democratic lawmaker in profane meltdown

Read Gil Duran's full article for The New Republic at this link.


'Upending American church life': Religious leaders slam Trump for 'inciting fear'

A group of top Catholic leaders, including bishops and nuns, have condemned the Trump administration's policies, saying they are "tearing apart families, inciting fear and upending American church life."

Speaking on a panel at Georgetown University, the religious leaders pointed to hardline immigration policies as the reason people are staying away from school and church.

"The way that the immigration policies are enforced these days are not only destabilizing the life of the particular immigrant, but whole families, businesses, the life of children, whole communities, neighborhoods," said Auxiliary Bishop Evelio Menjivar-Ayala, of Washington, D.C. "What I'm seeing in people's eyes, is pain and a deep confusion. … Where do we go from here if we're not welcome."

READ MORE: 'So disgusting': MAGA fueling outrage by 'increasingly' questioning women’s right to vote

Today, Menjivar-Ayala, the first Salvadorian bishop in the United States, who crossed the U.S. border illegally in 1990 after leaving his native El Salvador during the country's civil war, is a U.S. citizen.

"For me, it's very personal because I was a stranger and you welcomed me," he told PBS.

Migrant rights activist Sister Norma Pimentel said she was "moved to tears" after visiting families at a detention facility in Texas.

READ MORE: 'He acts like Fidel': Trump’s support with Latino voters is 'plummeting''He acts like Fidel': Trump’s support with Latino voters is 'plummeting'

""I saw Border Patrol agents looking at us, and they, too, were moved and were crying," she said. "When I walked out of there, the officer turned to me and said, 'Thank you, sister, for helping us realize they're human beings.'"

Miami Archbishop Thomas Wenski agreed, saying, "The fact that we invite these detainees to pray, even in this very dehumanizing situation, is a way of emphasizing and invoking their dignity," he said. "More importantly that God has not forgotten them."

In a shocking twist, Gen Z women are walking away from religion — here's why

For decades, one of the most consistent findings in religion research has been that women tend to be more religious than men. This holds true across dozens of countries and on nearly every measure of religiosity, from how often someone prays to how important faith is in their lives.

Social scientists have struggled to pinpoint a universal cause for this pattern. Theories run the gamut – from the claim that it has something to do with women being more risk averse to the argument that religion offers women support for social responsibilities around birth, death and raising children.

In the past few years, however, survey data in the U.S. has started to tell a different story. Today, there is less empirical evidence that women are more religious than men – a debate I’ve tracked closely as a quantitative scholar of American religion. Looking at Generation Z, in particular, a number of results have raised some eyebrows, pointing toward other divides throughout the country.

Shrinking gap

In 2023, the American Enterprise Institute’s Survey Center on American Life found that 39% of Gen Z women say they do not have a religious affiliation, compared to 34% of men from the same generation. The past several waves of data from the Cooperative Election Study, a national survey, have found that men born after 1990 – a mix of younger millennials and Gen Z – are slightly more likely to attend religious services weekly than women of the same age.

When I give a lecture or presentation, often the first question I’m asked is about this surprising result.

I warn people to take it with a grain of salt. According to data from the 2022 General Social Survey, one of the most well-respected national polls, the opposite is true: among Americans ages 18-45, women are still more likely to attend a house of worship nearly every week. And the Pew Religious Landscape Study, which was released in February 2025, concludes, “While the gender gap in American religion appears to be narrowing, there are still no birth cohorts in which men are significantly more religious than women.”

All together, a growing body of survey evidence suggests that the overall religiosity of young American adults does not vary significantly by gender.

Anecdotal reports about scores of young men flocking to church or joining religious communities like Eastern Orthodoxy seem to grab headlines. However, the idea of a reversal in the gender gap is not supported by evidence – only that it is narrowing.

Drifting apart

If America’s gender gap around religion is changing, perhaps politics can help explain why.

A growing body of survey data suggests that overall, young men are moving further to the right on political matters, while young women are becoming increasingly progressive.

An NBC News poll in April 2025 found that among people ages 30-44, men were about 9 percentage points more likely to approve of Donald Trump’s job performance than women of the same age. Among those ages 18-29, the gap widened to a staggering 21 points.

A few months later, NBC polled nearly 3,000 young Americans about how they define success, asking them to select the top three factors from a list of 13. Overall, men between 18-29 rated “being married” and “having children” slightly higher than women their age. Among Gen Z men who voted for Trump, having children was the most important. Women who voted for Kamala Harris, meanwhile, ranked children near the bottom.

The largest religious traditions in America today are evangelical Protestant Christianity and the Catholic Church. Both groups’ teachings emphasize “traditional” gender roles, marriage and having children. For a growing wave of young progressive women, such teachings are at odds with their desire to make advances in the workplace and society. Some analysts argue that those tensions, as well as views on LGBTQ+ rights, are driving women away from institutional religion.

Opposite directions

As a result, Generation Z may be the most visible manifestation of the growing “God gap” in American politics.

In short, the religious compositions of the two major political parties have gone in opposite directions. In the 1990s, 67% of Republicans said they believed in God without a doubt, and 63% of Democrats said the same, according to my analysis of General Social Survey data. By 2022, certain belief in God had dropped to 39% among Democrats, while holding fairly steady among Republicans, at 63%. Twenty-eight percent of Democrats regularly attend a house of worship, compared to 42% of Republicans; in the 1970s, the gap was only 4 percentage points.

This all points to a broader, potentially more polarized future for the American public. Already, there is evidence that a growing number of people choose their house of worship based on political tribe, not just theological beliefs, making congregations less diverse. Women’s and men’s competing interests and preferences may make it harder to find a suitable partner. Common ground may be harder to find when there are fewer chances for interaction and conversation.

Ultimately, these trends suggest a future where polarization extends beyond politics and into the very fabric of American life – shaping where people worship, who they marry, and how communities form.The Conversation

Ryan Burge, Professor of Practice, Danforth Center on Religion and Politics, Washington University in St. Louis

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

How Christianity’s 'kook' fringe went mainstream in Trump's MAGA world

The far-right National Conservatism Conference used to be an event that many traditional Goldwater and McCain conservatives made a point of avoiding. But with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement now dominating the GOP, NatCon is drawing a lot more attention in Republican circles.

In an article published on September 13, Salon's Heather Digby Parton points to growing interest in NatCon as a troubling example of how much Christianity's lunatic fringe is influencing the GOP and the MAGA movement.

Describing the most recent NatCon gathering — which was held in Washington, D.C. in early September — Parton explains, "'Overturn Obergefell' was one featured panel, the AP's Joey Cappelletti reported. 'The Bible and American Renewal' was another. The conference, he wrote, 'underscored the movement's vision of an America rooted in limited immigration, Christian identity and the preservation of what speakers called the nation's traditional culture' — which is putting it very mildly. It certainly doesn’t seem there was much talk of individual freedom, free markets or liberty of any kind, and that is a big change from the conservative movement that has dominated Republican politics since the Reagan Administration."

READ MORE: 'Doing a pretty terrible job': Trump official mocked over response to dismal economic data

The far-right NatCon gathering should not be confused with National Council for Mental Wellbeing event that is also abbreviated NatCon. The health event was held in Philadelphia in May, not in Washington, D.C. in early September, and has zero connection to the political event.

This year's political NatCon, Parton observes, featured some prominent figures in the Trump Administration — including National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard; Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget and a key architect of Project 2025; and border czar Tom Homan.

"But perhaps the most revealing moment was a viral speech by Missouri GOP Sen. Eric Schmitt titled 'What is an American?' in which he made the claim that the country belongs to the descendants of white Europeans who took the land from the violent Native Americans fair and square because they were just plain superior," Parton observes. "He said straight out: 'America doesn't belong to them — it belongs to us.… We can no longer apologize for who we are. Our people tamed the continent, built a civilization from the wilderness. We Americans are the sons and daughters of the Christian pilgrims who poured out onto the ocean's shores.'"

Schmitt, Parton adds, even promoted the Great Replacement Theory during his speech.

READ MORE: 'Republican for Trump': Alleged Kirk shooter's grandmother confirms entire family is MAGA

A recurring theme of NatCon, Parton warns, is that the U.S. is not only a Christian nation — it is a white Christian nation.

"It's tempting to write off NatCon, and Schmitt's speech in particular, as an example of a bunch of right-wing kooks indulging their little fever dream of creating a white Christian autocracy," Parton stresses. "But these are powerful people now, and if there's any person in government who is trying to create 'a pastiche of past glories' — largely by erasing the true American past, both good and bad — it's the most powerful one of all, Donald Trump, who has certainly discovered that 'you can just do things!'"

Parton continues, "Nobody paid attention to Project 2025 until it was too late, and look where that got us. It would be foolish to make that same mistake again."

READ MORE: 'Doing a pretty terrible job': Trump official mocked over response to dismal economic data

Heather Digby Parton's full article for Salon is available at this link.

TX GOPer blasted for 'using religion for personal gain' as Trump promotes prayer in schools

Proponents of separating church and state on Monday decried US President Donald Trump's pledge to protect prayer in public schools, warning that the administration is advancing the agenda of far-right Christian nationalists seeking to impose their religious beliefs upon everyone.

Speaking at a meeting of the president's so-called Religious Liberty Commission at the Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, Trump announced upcoming Department of Education guidance "protecting the right to prayer in our public schools, and it's total protection."

"We're defending our rights and restoring our identity as a nation under God," Trump said. "To have a great nation, you have to have religion. I believe that so strongly. As president, I will always defend our glorious heritage, and we will protect the Judeo-Christian principles of our founding."

The president added that it is "ridiculous" that the nation's public school students are "indoctrinated with anti-religious propaganda, and some are even punished for their religious beliefs."

Trump also launched his "America Prays" initiative, which asks the faithful to "join with at least 10 people to meet each week for one hour to pray" for the country.

In response to the president's speech, the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) said on social media: "We've never been 'one nation under God.' There's nothing to restore. Our true identity is freedom of conscience—the right to believe in any faith, or none at all."

"A great nation isn't built on religion—it's built on equality, liberty, and justice for all," FFRF added. "Our strength comes from We The People, not belief in a god."

Rachel Laser, president of the group Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said in a statement that Monday's event "once again demonstrated that this commission isn't about religious liberty; it's about rejecting the nation's religious diversity and prioritizing one set of Christian beliefs."

"From the professions of Christian faith to the chorus of 'amens' during Christian prayers to the exclusively Christian speakers this morning, this government hearing was more like a church service," Laser noted. "Once again, President Trump is using religion to promote his self-aggrandizement and political agenda, all the while perpetuating the lie that America is a Christian nation and that religion is under attack."

Laser continued:

The Trump administration is advancing this Christian nationalist agenda with the launch of his 'America Prays' initiative, which calls on Americans to pray for our country. People who care about religious freedom don't need to be told when or how to pray; they need leaders who are committed to separation of church and state.At a hearing focused on religious freedom and public schools, the commission ignored the most serious threats. From mandates to display the Ten Commandments and teach from the Bible to Christianity-infused curriculum and the installation of school chaplains, Christian nationalists and their political allies are trying to impose their personal religious beliefs on America's public school children.

"Our country's promise of church-state separation means that families—not politicians or public school officials—get to decide how and when children engage with religion," Laser added. "Yet many of the organizations represented at today's meeting and members of the Religious Liberty Commission have tried to undermine this fundamental American principle and turn our public schools into Sunday schools."

Monday's event came as some GOP-led states push forward with plans for more overt displays of religiosity in public schools. Most notably, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton—a US Senate candidate—is urging schools to display the Ten Commandments in spite of a federal judge's recent injunction on a law requiring the Judeo-Christian religious and ethical directives to be displayed in all classrooms.

Paxton is also urging all schools "to begin the legal process of putting prayer back in the classroom and recommending the Lord's Prayer for students."

Responding to Paxton's push, gun control advocate Fred Guttenberg said last week on social media: "Hey Ken, many have said that you committed adultery. Shouldn't you worry about your own morality before imposing this on others? Looks like you are using religion for personal gain."

Recent polls have shown a significant drop in the number of Americans who identify as Christian in recent decades, an all-time low in belief in "God," and a steady overall decline in religiosity among younger Americans.

'Stop it now while you still can': MAGA melts down over police patch in state Trump won

On Friday morning, September 5, Republican Dearborn Heights, Michigan Mayor Bilal "Bill" Bazzi — President Donald Trump's nominee for U.S. ambassador to Tunisia — addressed MAGA Republicans' angry response to an optional police patch that incorporates Arabic. Bazzi, according to Fox 2 TV, said that the patch was strictly an idea and shouldn't have been presented as official.

The 62-year-old Bazzi was born in Lebanon but has lived in the United States since he was ten. In 2024, he endorsed Trump for president.

Although the patch was strictly optional — no officers in the Dearborn Heights Police Department would have been required to wear it if they didn't want to — many far-right MAGA Republicans and conspiracy theorists claimed that it was part of an effort to impose Sharia law in Michigan.

READ MORE: 'Never been this bad': Young MAGA influencers say their income is 'tanking' due to Trump

On X, formerly Twitter, ACT For America's Brigitte Gabriel posted, "This is how it starts. Dearborn Heights Police Dept. now has the nation's first-ever uniform patch in Arabic. The civilization takeover has begun."

Trump ally and self-described "proud Islamophobe" Laura Loomer wrote, "Sharia Law in America. Muslims have invaded America and now they are taking over. They must be stopped."

Turning Point USA's Charlie Kirk tweeted, "Thanks to chain migration, Muslims are now a majority in Michigan's Dearborn Heights (named after a Revolutionary War general). Now, local police have rolled out the country’s first-ever police badge with Arabic script. When you get conquered, you get a new language."

MAGA Republican Albert Latham posted, "No government badge or shield or seal should ever feature any language but English, Greek or Latin.

READ MORE: 'He was an FBI informant': Mike Johnson makes stunning admission about Trump

Amy Mek, founder of RAIR Foundation, wrote, " BREAKING AMERICA America's First Islamic-Controlled City Enacts Sharia — Non-Muslim Arrested Over Facebook Post This is where it begins. When a city welcomes Islam into political power, the mask comes off. Dearborn, Michigan — now a Muslim-majority city with a Muslim mayor and Islamic police chief — has turned into America's first test case for Sharia-style justice."

Florida State Sen. Randy Fine tweeted, "They said their goal was to bring sharia law to America. You should've believed them. Pray for Michigan."

Blaze Media's Auron MacIntyre posted, "Muslim immigration to the US must be halted immediately and mass deportations must be conducted. Stop it now while you still can."

READ MORE: Busted: Susan Collins advanced Trump bill after receiving $2 million from billionaire

'His strategy is unmissable': How Trump is weaponizing speculation about his health

President Donald Trump has never been shy about promoting far-right conspiracy theories, but during Labor Day Weekend 2025, Trump himself became the subject of a conspiracy theory. Trump, for a few days, had been keeping a relatively low profile — and conspiracy theorists claimed that the 79-year-old president had died. Those false claims were refuted when new photos of Trump were posted online and showed that he was very much alive.

Nonetheless, Trump's health is receiving a lot of discussion. And Salon's Chauncey DeVega, in an article published on September 4, emphasizes that Trump's response to health concerns is clearly aimed at his evangelical Christian fundamentalist supporters.

"I am agnostic about Donald Trump's health," DeVega explains. "When I look at him, I see Roy Cohn's protégé, a man animated by his life's mission of attaining unlimited power. Men with that kind of drive tend to live a long time. So last weekend, amid all the speculation about the president's health, I remained dispassionate. Admittedly, the circumstances were strange. By Saturday, (August 30), Trump hadn't been seen since his epic three-hour Cabinet meeting four days earlier — unusually long for someone who loves public attention as much as he does."

READ MORE: Economist Paul Krugman says Trump 'telling the truth' on this issue — but there's a catch

DeVega continues, "This fueled wild and baseless rumors that the White House had been relying on body doubles, that Trump had been felled by a stroke or some other catastrophic health event, and that the whole thing was being covered up — and that it was all being hidden like something out of Stalinist Russia or some other autocratic regime."

Trump, according to DeVega, is responding to concerns about his health by "continuing a weeks-long pattern of emphasizing his salvation anxieties to gain and retain the loyalties of the white Christian Right."

"For those who come from an evangelical background, his strategy is unmissable," DeVega argues. "But for many members of the mainstream media and political establishment, most of whom were not brought up in a culture that functions by using coded verbal cues and emotional pleas for understanding and support, Trump's tactics aren't as obvious…. By any honest assessment of his professed faith, Trump is also a willful sinner. Yet his popularity among white Christians has not suffered; if anything, he fits their 'Cyrus prophecy' about how wicked men can be used to fulfill God's plans for the nation."

DeVega continues, "But even this exhaustive list is incomplete. Trump also functions as a type of preacher. He is using the presidency's bully pulpit to address, manipulate and control his congregation — the MAGA movement — or, in evangelical terms, his 'church family.' As his authoritarian power and aspirations grow, Trump will likely only amplify this aspect of his persona."

READ MORE: 'Sound familiar?' Mitch McConnell lobs parting shot at 'America First' Republicans

Trump is by no means universally loved within Christianity. In politics, it isn't hard to find churchgoing Christians, both Catholics and Mainline Protestants, who are vehement critics of the president — from former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, an Episcopalian, to Catholics who include Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) and former President Joe Biden. But Trump continues to have a very strong bond with far-right white evangelical fundamentalists.

"When Trump shares his worries about heaven and his soul, he is activating similar feelings among his MAGA followers," observes DeVega, himself a scathing Trump critic. "This makes him seem like a more authentic and relatable leader."

READ MORE: 'Trump takes this snub personally': Conservative mocks 'saddest little dictator'

Chauncey DeVega's full article for Salon is available at this link.

Trump's 'out of character' remarks about death are 'revealing — and intentional': analysis

President Donald Trump revisited the "heaven" theme in a fundraising e-mail sent on Monday, August 25, telling supporters, "I want to try and get to Heaven. Last year I came millimeters from death when that bullet pierced through my skin. My triumphant return to the White House was never supposed to happen! But I believe that God saved me for one reason: TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! I wasn't supposed to beat Crooked Hillary in 2016 — but I did."

Trump continued, "I wasn't supposed to secure the border & build the greatest economy in history — but I did. I certainly wasn't supposed to survive an assassin's bullet — but by the grace of the almighty God, I did. SO NOW, I have no other choice but to answer the Call to Duty, but I can't do it alone. Friend, you've been with me through everything."

Previously, Trump played up the "heaven" theme during an August August 19 appearance on Fox News, humorously telling the "Fox & Friends" host, "I want to try and get to heaven to heaven, if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well. I'm really at the bottom of the totem pole."

READ MORE: 'Let me just stop you there': Wallace cuts off guest who calls for 'nuance' on Trump move

Trump's "heaven" comments are being mocked and ridiculed by his detractors. But in an article published on August 28, Salon's Chauncey DeVega — himself a scathing critic — argues that the "heaven" messaging is "smart politics" on Trump's part.

"At first glance," DeVega explains, "Trump's expressions of doubt seemed out of character for a man who has consistently refused to show any vulnerability or admissions of infallibility. His comments were revealing — and intentional. Trump is playing the role of the humble sinner who wants to repent and find grace…. Since 2016, Trump has made his professed Christian faith and personal relationship with God a central feature of his public persona. Yet his behavior and policies — which are rooted in political sadism and a lust for unchecked power — tell a different story."

DeVega adds, "As the Atlantic's Adam Serwer famously warned, Trump's ideology and modus operandi are driven by how 'the cruelty is the point.'"

The Salon journalist stresses, however, that while Trump's "humble sinner" rhetoric plays well with his base, it is disingenuous light of his efforts to undermine U.S. democracy.

READ MORE: 'It’s a real gut punch': Rural voters 'stunned' by Trump’s damage

"Trump's vision of a post-democracy America stands in stark opposition to the grace he claims to seek," DeVega warns. "His politics of vengeance and his desire to be the country's first dictator are antithetical to his goal of getting into heaven. Is such a thing even possible for Trump and people like him? One does not have to be religious to ponder that question."

According to DeVega, those who are mocking Trump's "heaven" comments aren't the audience for that messaging.

"Many on both the center and the left have been mocking Trump's supposed Christian values and public desire to get into heaven," DeVega stresses. "For them, his profession of faith is a transparent farce and a performance to win over the MAGA rubes and other members of the white right. But they are not his audience."

DeVega continues, "In reality, Trump's appeals to heaven and Christian salvation are smart politics. He is speaking directly to his most zealous supporters on the Christian right who feel alienated from mainstream American society and view secular society as the enemy."

READ MORE: 'Not joking': Ex-Trump official warns he privately 'waxes poetic' about dictators he admires

Chauncey DeVega's full column for Salon is available at this link.

'I will not back down': Right-wing AG demands red state's schools defy court order

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on Monday said that the vast majority of schools in the Lone Star State should still plan on displaying the Ten Commandments in classrooms even after a federal judge ruled against it last week.

In a statement, Paxton said that "schools not enjoined by ongoing litigation must abide" by a state law that requires the display of the Ten Commandments in all public and secondary school classrooms.

"The woke radicals seeking to erase our nation's history will be defeated," he said. "I will not back down from defending the virtues and values that built this country."

Paxton asserted that only nine Texas school districts are affected by the injunction and said that all other districts "must abide by the law once it takes effect on September 1, 2025."

The Texas attorney general's defiant stance on the Ten Commandments earned him a quick rebuke from Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), who accused him of grandstanding instead of doing his job as the state's chief law enforcement official.

"Paxton's job is to uphold the Constitution, which guarantees the separation of church and state—not the Ten Commandments," he wrote on X. "Our public schools should focus on educating Texas students, not stoking culture wars."

The Freedom From Religion Foundation also rebuked Paxton for failing to uphold the Constitution's prohibition of the government establishment of a religion.

"The Constitution, not the Ten Commandments, built this country," the foundation said. "Forcing students to observe one religion’s rules is a blatant violation of the First Amendment regardless of what Ken Paxton claims. Public schools are for education, not religious indoctrination."

Paxton's declaration came less than a week after US District Judge Fred Biery of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction against the state law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed.

In his ruling, Biery argued that the classroom displays "are likely to pressure the [students] into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school."

Evangelical leader's legacy destroyed with exposure of church's destructive practice

On Thursday, August 21, James Dobson — founder of Focus on the Family and the Family Research Council — passed away at 89. Dobson was one of the most influential far-right evangelical Christian fundamentalists in the United States; along with the Moral Majority's Rev. Jerry Fawell Sr. and the Christian Broadcasting Network's (CBN) Pat Roberson, Dobson played a key role in the Religious Right's takeover of the Republican Party during the 1980s.

Dobson was an extremely polarizing figure, pushing a movement that drew scathing criticism from both the left and the left. Liberal television producer Norman Lear founded People For the American Way to combat the Religious Right, a movement that conservative Sen. Barry Goldwater (R-Arizona) believed was terrible for the GOP and terrible for conservatism.

Esquire's Charles P. Pierce didn't mince words in a blistering article published the day of Dobson's death, commenting, "One of the most truly horrible humans ever inflicted on this country has ceased to be, and all say, 'Amen' and 'about g------ time." And Anthea Butler, a religious studies professor at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, was highly critical of him in an op-ed published by MSNBC that day — arguing that Dobson championed a "harsh, disciplinarian Christianity" and "vilified gay people."

READ MORE: Bill Maher hits raw nerve with detailed warning of Trump's 'slow-moving coup'

Gay author Timothy Schraeder Rodriguez examines Dobson's use of anti-gay "conversion therapy" in an article published by Religion News Service on August 22, emphasizing that his experience with that practice brought him nothing but misery.

"For LGBTQ+ people like me," Rodriguez laments, "his legacy was one of shame, rejection and the lie that we needed to be 'cured.' His radio show and books reached millions, and his political influence stretched from Ronald Reagan to Donald Trump. Dobson was the man who dared a generation of parents to discipline strong-willed children and to guard their homes against what he claimed were corrupting cultural influences, especially homosexuality…. For parents listening to Dobson in their minivans, for youth pastors playing his cassette tapes for their students, that wasn't just commentary — it was a license to treat queer people as dangerous and sexuality as something that needed to, and must be, changed."

Rodriguez, author of the forthcoming book, "Conversion Therapy Dropout: A Queer Story of Faith and Belonging," adds, "I know, because I was one of those queer kids sitting in the audience."

"Conversion therapy," according to Rodriguez, is not only traumatic and harmful to gays — it doesn't work.

READ MORE: MAGA is panicking as Trump finally meets his match

"Conservatives mourning Dobson this week will call him a defender of the family," Rodriguez writes. "Franklin Graham praised him as someone who 'stood for morality and Biblical values.' Others say his impact will echo for generations; they're not wrong. But for LGBTQ+ people like me, his legacy means broken families, rejection and years lost to self-hatred…. I do not celebrate James Dobson's death, but I will not mourn him the way his followers do."

Rodriguez continues, "His influence shaped American evangelicalism for nearly half a century, and for LGBTQ+ people, that influence was beyond toxic — it was tragic. His death doesn't heal the lives or families torn apart by his teachings. And it doesn't absolve him of the shame and hatred he spread in the name of Christian love."

READ MORE: 'Fumbling' Trump’s Epstein problem explodes as his base has second thoughts about electing him

Timothy Schraeder Rodriguez's full article for Religion News Service (RNS) is available at this link.

'Fundamental weakness': Why evangelical Trump supporters claim 'empathy is a sin'

The word "empathy" usually has a positive connotation. But during an interview with vodcast host Joe Rogan in February, Tesla/SpaceX/X.com head Elon Musk railed against "suicidal empathy" and declared, "The fundamental weakness of western civilization is empathy, the empathy exploit."

Musk's critics were quick to pounce, arguing that his disdain for "empathy" underscores the lack of compassion that plagues the far right and President Donald Trump's MAGA movement.

Musk, however, isn't the only one who claims that "empathy" is a bad thing.

READ MORE: Aides sat 'helpless' as 'incoherent' Trump displayed 'stunning ignorance': biographer

In an article published on August 21, Associated Press (AP) reporter Tiffany Stanley takes a look at far-right white evangelical Christian fundamentalists who "are preaching that" empathy "has become a vice."

Allie Beth Stuckey, author of the 2024 book "Toxic Empathy: How Progressives Exploit Christian Compassion" and host of the podcast "Relatable," told AP, "Empathy becomes toxic when it encourages you to affirm sin, validate lies or support destructive policies."

Another anti-empathy book is evangelical pastor Joe Rigney's "The Sin of Empathy: Compassion and its Counterfeits."

According to Stanley, the "anti-empathy arguments" coming from Stuckey, Rigney and others "gained traction in the early months of President Donald Trump’s second term."

READ MORE: 'They said it's a felony': Police yank Dem lawmaker out of bathroom for speaking to media

But not all Christians are buying into the anti-empathy arguments coming from white evangelicals and MAGA Republicans.

Historian Susan Lanzoni, a graduate of Harvard Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts, told AP that empathy is "the whole message of Jesus."

The Rev. Canon Dana Colley Corsello of the Washington National Cathedral takes issue with the evangelical anti-empathy trend as well.

Corsello told AP, "Empathy is at the heart of Jesus’ life and ministry…. It’s so troubling that this is even up for debate."

READ MORE: 'Baby out with the bathwater': Red state Trump voters speaking out against this key policy

Read Tiffany Stanley's full Associated Press article at this link.

@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.