robert jeffress

Trump White House rocked by 'no paper trail' scandal

President Donald Trump's corruption is reaching a state of critical mass, a political analyst warned on Wednesday — and the fact that this pattern exists is having profound consequences in terms of Americans' trust in their government.

"A now-former ambassador [Kimberly Guilfoyle] who asked for $100,000 to cover her credit card debt from a man she was helping lobby the administration — and repeatedly urged the man not to leave a paper trail, according to texts obtained by the Wall Street Journal," CNN's Aaron Blake wrote on Wednesday while listing the major corruption scandals that have rocked Trump's administration over the past few weeks. "Her lawyers have denied the allegations."

Blake added, "The Department of Homeland Security buying multiple airplanes from a donor to the outgoing secretary at apparently inflated prices. The former secretary and current secretary have pointed to one another for the purchases." He continued with "a Russian oligarch paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for parts of Donald Trump Jr.’s wedding celebration. Trump Jr.’s wife downplayed the idea that there was anything amiss with the arrangement, but the oligarch later said Trump Jr. had refunded the money."

Blake then mentioned "a mysterious alleged multimillion-dollar transfer from a wealthy Turkish investor that one Trump ally (who recently married the investor) claims another Trump ally misallocated, according to reports in Axios and the Times. More on that complicated mess below" as well as "that same first Trump ally, married to the Turkish investor, accepting a job that would pay her $50 million even as she served as a top adviser in Trump’s Justice Department — shortly before the billionaire Venezuelan banker who hired her got a pardon he had been seeking. She denied any role in the pardon."

He later brought up even more scandals, writing that "these aren’t the only remarkable and eye-catching developments for those looking out for corruption over the last two years, of course. Trump has made more than $1 billion off cryptocurrency. He’s repeatedly promoted companies shortly after buying their stock, according to a CNN investigation. His social media company is allowing Wall Street firms to pay for quicker access to market-moving posts. And he accepted a jet as a gift from Qatar to use as Air Force One; it is supposed to be transferred to his presidential library."

As a consequence, "a Gallup poll recently showed a record-high 89 percent of Americans said corruption was widespread in the US government." A similar 88 percent were found by Fox News to be either "extremely" or "very" concerned about government corruption. Going through other polls, Blake found an unbroken pattern of Americans believing the government is corrupt and Trump is a big part of the problem — although they're skeptical that Democrats would make things better.

Blake is not alone in noticing that Trump's corruption is having political consequences. Earlier in October, The Bulwark's economist Catherine Rampell wrote that "Donald Trump is robbing Americans blind, and even Republicans are starting to notice. You may recall that back in March, there were some suspiciously timed, uncannily lucrative oil and stock trades. About fifteen minutes before Trump abruptly announced he was retracting some threats against Iran, billions of dollars’ worth of contracts were placed on bets that oil prices would fall and the S&P 500 would jump. And those lucky bastards turned out to be right!"

Robert Reich, who served as Secretary of Labor under former President Bill Clinton, wrote earlier in October that "Trump’s war on Iran is causing Americans to spend almost 50 percent more on gas than before the war, on average. And the diesel fuel needed to transport almost everything else we buy now averages more than $6.00 a gallon, which is also being passed on to consumers. These price increases due to Trump’s war tell only half the story. The other half is the political corruption at the root of the war — enriching Trump’s friends and family."

Speaking to AlterNet in September, polling expert Kyle Kondik of Sabato's Crystal Ball provided more detail about the historical context in which Trump is grappling with these corruption scandals.

"It's primarily the president's weak approval rating combined with the usual difficulty that the presidential party has in a midterm," Kondik told AlterNet. "I also think there may be even more for voters to react to in 2026 compared to even 2018, because Trump has acted as more of an imperial president and there is more dissatisfaction both with the economy as well as the president's foreign policy choices."

What Trump said to Stephen A. Smith after intense White House insults

Stephen A. Smith is letting the world in on details about a secret meeting he had with President Donald Trump following a dinner he attended recently that sparked major backlash. Smith, who is often publicly critical of the president, joined Bill Maher and Kid Rock for a dinner at the White House this month. Smith clarified his attendance in a recent episode of his podcast.

“It was not my meeting,” Smith explained on the show. “The president had reached out to Bill Maher.” According to Smith, Maher told him that Trump pushed him to “bring one of your crazy leftist friends with you,” resulting in Maher inviting Smith, which Trump agreed to and seemed excited about, as Trump reportedly said he had ‘a lot’ he wanted to say to Smith.

“Evidently he forgot he knew me for 35 years, because I immediately said, ‘Yes, I’m coming,’” Smith said. He says Trump wasted no time in hurling insults at Smith upon his arrival at the White House.

“When he finally saw me, he accused me of being nasty and mean to him because obviously, contrary to what some of you may want to recognize, I have been critical of this president. There’s a lot of things I don’t like,” he said on his podcast.

Smith told the hosts of The View he had his own agenda in attending the dinner. “I went to the White House to look him in the face and to address things,” Smith said, explaining that he confronted the president on what he views as policies “basically impeding the willingness of folks in the private sector to be as charitable and as philanthropic as they’ve been in the past” against HBCUs and DEI initiatives.

Smith continued, adding, “To his credit, he said, ‘I actually didn’t think about that. I’m going to think about that a lot more, and I’ll be talking to you about it.’ To his credit, thereafter, he called me after the meeting a couple of days later to ask me to reiterate what my points were about the HBCUs, because he plans on talking to people about that in the next few days.”

Trump publicly claimed the meeting went well. “Even though they have to put on a certain little facade for their people, they like Trump, and I actually like them,” he said, as reported by USA Today. Fellow podcaster and sports journalist Jemele Hill has been critical of Smith’s decision to meet with the president, calling the meeting a “dummy mission.”

Trump’s 250-foot arch triggers last-minute shakeup

Just after the final plans for President Donald Trump’s triumphal arch were revealed, The Washington Post reports that the administration made a key change that could influence the upcoming vote on the controversial project. The commission’s 12 members include the heads of the Pentagon, the Department and the General Services Administration, who typically send deputies to serve as alternate commissioners in their place.

Tammy Stidham, a senior National Park Service official who was among those replaced, had served for several years as the Interior secretary’s alternate commissioner and voted on numerous previous projects.

The vote on Trump’s arch is sparking major debate because of its location, which will sit near Arlington National Cemetery. Those opposing the proposed location, including veterans groups, local advocacy organizations and historic preservationists, have urged Trump to reduce the planned arch’s 250-foot height or choose a different site altogether. Two of the new alternate commissioners are military veterans.

Before the change, the commission was filled with Trump allies, including those who approved the new White House ballroom, another controversial project. The commission’s chair, Mark Paoletta, says he plans to approve the arch.

“The empty Memorial Traffic Circle built in 1940 does not complete the grand design authorized and envisioned by the Arlington Memorial Bridge Commission and by Congress as enacted in the 1925 law,” Paoletta wrote on X this week. “It is a disgrace to our nation and her noble veterans.”

The arch is proposed to be an extravagant, standing 250-foot-tall structure built of concrete, with an opening 55 feet wide. If approved, it would be twice the height of the nearby 99-foot Lincoln Memorial nearby. USA Today reports two gilded eagles would sit above the arch's legs, and a gilded winged figure holding a torch would sit at the top. Speaking of the Lincoln Memorial, the arch would stand across the Potomac River, with the memorials seemingly across from one another in the distance.

And it doesn’t stop with the statue; the plan is to have a development surrounding it. The arch monument would measure 166 feet wide and include an observation deck overlooking the surrounding area, which will be equipped with six stairways and five elevators for access to interior spaces and public areas. There’s supposed to be a surrounding plaza, granite pavers, landscaping, a stone seat wall, and pedestrian crosswalks with lighting.

Preliminary plans for the arch were approved in July. Final site and building approval will be determined during the upcoming Nov. 5 meeting.

Trump took her to the 'breaking point': Former DOJ prosecutor speaks out

Former Justice Department lawyer Sarah Wilson spent years working for the federal government and representing agency clients, in both Democratic and Republican administrations. But she said the second Trump administration took her to the point where she could no longer do her job.

“We realized something different was going on here,” Wilson told Bloomberg Law, describing revamped agencies where politicized department heads and outright hacks were making legal decisions that should be left to actual lawyers.

“It was a scary time,” said Wilson. “… We went from being seen as the starting point for any discussions on how a case was going to being the last person to know about some of these decisions being made in our case.”

Normally when a court order comes in the attorneys study it and decide what it requires their government agency client to do. Department of Justice attorneys are going to have to show up in court and defend the choices made, after all, so lawyers first have to hash out if the order can be complied with without some form of tweaking. And sometimes, she said, the honest answer is ‘no.’

“There are definitely orders that come down from trial court judges that simply aren't possible. Or maybe we could comply — but there's a good reason we shouldn't have to,” said Wilson. “We have to figure out why we have to file a motion and alert the court that there's an impossibility here, that we might have to ask the court to lift some of the requirements so that it can actually be carried out [in accord with the Constitution].”

That's how it used to work, but under the second Trump Administration the administration barred career lawyers from analyzing that paperwork.

“At some point we were told we were not allowed to advise clients on decisions on how to comply with court orders, for example, or decisions that were going to have to be made at a much higher level,” said Wilson.

“Wait. You were told you couldn't advise [agency] clients?” demanded Bloomberg host Matthew Schwartz.

“Yeah. I mean never in my career has a lawyer’s access to the client been limited in that way. It wasn’t in every case, … but then it happened over and over again,” Wilson answered.

Another former attorney that Schwartz spoke to described instructions deliberately limiting what lawyers could tell their agency clients. The instructions came in writing, according to the unnamed source. For example, a senior Trump political appointee of the Justice Department’s Civil Division ordered lawyers handling high profile immigration cases to send the agency heads the judge's order, only without analysis on how to comply. Agency politicians, according to the source, was expected to figure things out on their own. This later became standard practice, reports the source — which might explain the Trump administration’s repeated failure to adhere to judicial orders, and probably plenty of bungled legal submissions.

“Just to be clear attorneys’ advise their clients,” argued Schwartz flatly. “It’s one of the main things an attorney does. The American Bar Association Model Rule No. 2.1 puts it plainly: A lawyer's job, it says, is to ‘exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice.’

“I felt like this wasn't the job we signed up for,” said Wilson. “And to be villainizing us and make it seem like we were not part of the team but we were somehow antagonistic to the team, and that our legal advice, our legal knowledge was somehow adversely affecting the department. It was a really hard thing to hear.”

The result, said Schwartz, is that departments like Homeland Security have violated more court orders than other agencies have violated in their entire existence.

An eye-popping number of Republicans now want Trump impeached

On Wednesday, a new poll by Politico revealed that “impeachment is back on the menu.” With President Donald Trump’s approval hitting historic lows and scandals rocking his administration, a majority of voters – including a surprisingly high percentage of Republicans – want him impeached. And barring that, they want several of his officials on the chopping block.

“Half of Americans support impeaching Trump and more than two-thirds expect Democrats to try if they flip the House — even though they have doubts about whether doing so would materially weaken the president,” writes Politico. “In total, 54 percent of Americans — including 81 percent of voters who plan to support Democrats in the midterms and a quarter of Republican midterm voters — say Trump has committed impeachable offenses, the poll found. More than 41 percent of respondents said Trump had used the presidency to benefit himself or his family financially, and a third said Democrats should prioritize investigating how he’s enriched himself, while another third said they should focus on probing his immigration crackdown.”

Majorities on both sides of the aisle, however, think that an impeachment in the House would do little to check the president. What is striking, however, is the sizeable number of Republicans who want to see Trump impeached. Even if they think it will have little impact on him, that one of four midterm GOP voters approve has major implications for the November elections. While the poll found that Democratic voters are split on whether their candidates should talk about impeachment in their midterm campaigns, these numbers suggest that a surprising number of people across the political spectrum could back that message. While most voters agree that Trump’s impeachment might not deliver the change they hope, Democrats are eager to oust his Cabinet secretaries. Democratic midterm voters say they want to see the House impeach HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (65 percent), Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth (63 percent), VP JD Vance (58 percent) and Secretary of State Marco Rubio (49 percent).

It is notable that the polls were conducted between October 16-19, just before an explosion of bipartisan outrage erupted over Trump’s recent concessions to Russia and suggestions that his administration may have actively hindered the Ukrainian war effort. Fox News was already sounding impeachment alarm bells before the Russia scandals, and now that accusations that the administration may have acted illegally have leapt up – even among conservatives – experts have raised the possibility. What’s more, recent reports revealed that Pentagon insiders are ready to “spill their guts” in proceedings against Hegseth that have been pushed by Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY). As one “well-connected” source told the Telegraph, “There’s going to be a lot of people that are going to very quietly go to the chair of the armed [services] committee and are going to spill their guts, provide them with everything they can and leak everything they can. It’ll be horrendous. It’ll be consistent embarrassment."

MAGA men are stockpiling food to prepare for disaster from Trump’s economy

Dallas Cruze was once a huge supporter of President Donald Trump in Detroit, Michigan. Now he thinks voting is pointless. He revealed that despite making $85,000 a year, he will still be short about $350 on his bills.

“I’ve checked out," he told Bloomberg News, which approached him as he sat at a table in a board game shop.

Cruze was among the young men who flocked to Trump in 2024 from the so-called "manosphere" and male-focused podcast hosts. Thanks to Trump's youngest child, Barron Trump, the campaign invested heavily in these hosts and the president eagerly appeared on their shows.

Those in the manosphere once prided themselves as taking the "red pill," a reference to the film "The Matrix." Taking the pill revealed the hidden reality. For men, that secret truth wasn't that life was a simulation but rather that feminism has rigged society and relationships against men.

Now, Cruze revealed, they're talking about a "black pill." It's more of a fatalistic worldview, in which they believe that some men are just doomed to romantic and sexual rejection regardless of what they do, New America explained. They think it's more about being unattractive and that women choose men not based on personality but physical features. They dismiss women's complaints about intelligence, self-improvement, social skills, personality and even cleanliness as factors.

Now Cruze is more concerned about the economy and war in Iran.

"The final betrayal, he says, was Republicans’ inclination to protect the rich and powerful rather than prosecute those named in the records of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein," the report explained.

He's not alone; the gripe has proliferated through male-focused podcasts in 2026.

Now Cruze is more focused on what he fears is coming as Americans grow increasingly desperate.

“I don’t see it going any other way besides violence,” he told Bloomberg. He took an informal survey of those playing games in the room at other tables. “You have no idea how bad I want to be wrong.”

He suggested everyone make friends with people who are stockpiling rice and beans, raising chickens and squirreling away things like gold and silver.

“Those are the people that are actually paying attention to what’s actually happening,” he said.

Those voters expected Trump to deliver on promises about the affordability problem, low wages, high gas prices and his pledge for "no foreign wars." He's failed on all of them. Where he has delivered is in his "war on woke," where white men can feel like they're not being discriminated against. While Trump's efforts have focused largely on colleges, it hasn't helped much when those young men still can't afford to go to college.

Jobs are another problem. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics revealed that more than 700,000 women have entered the workforce since Trump came back into office. Only 65,000 men have. In large part, male-dominated jobs like construction, manufacturing, mining and transportation and warehousing have taken a hit in the Trump economy. The one industry that continues to grow is healthcare-related, which is a predominantly female field.

Amanda Iovino, co-founder of the GOP polling firm Pantheon Insight, said that what they've found is that young men are simply turning out again. They've tracked whether they will hold their noses and vote again or if they're simply checked out altogether.

“Does that mean that they are just not voting, so therefore they’re not participating in anything election-related, which includes polls?” Iovino said. “Or does that mean that they’re just turning everything off yet still voting? I have a difficult time believing that they’ll tune everything out and still go vote.”

Fox News calls out Trump admin for 'insulting' Americans

On Wednesday, Fox News pulled no punches in its assessment of the Trump administration’s approach to Russia. According to longtime national security contributor Rebeccah Heinrichs, footage of President Donald Trump’s envoy calling Russian leader Vladimir Putin a “humanitarian” is “insulting” to Americans.

“It's insulting, I think, for Americans to hear something like that,” said Heinrichs. “Of course, Russia, and in particular Putin, commits war crimes all the time. The fact that they snatched this innocent American who was minding his own business in Ukraine, snatched him and held him in a penal colony, clearly torturing him.” This is in reference to the release of Stephen Hubbard earlier in the day, a retired U.S. teacher who has been imprisoned in Russia since 2022 after being detained in Eastern Ukraine, where he was accused of fighting as a mercenary. While Moscow has portrayed the release as a gesture of goodwill to Trump, who in turn took to social media to pat himself on the back for getting the release with “no swap” in exchange – ignoring the fact that he just days ago handed Putin a huge gift by dropping sanctions against Russia – many experts have noted that Hubbard’s torture is in itself an embarrassment to Witkoff’s praise of Putin. As Heinrichs notes, “Every time Ukrainians do get any of their own people back from Russian captivity, there's evidence that they've been tortured. There's been Ukrainians tortured to death. So Putin is not a humanitarian.”

In Heinrich’s estimation, Russia is trying to push two narratives. “One, that it is being reasonable,” she explains. “That's why they're doing this hostage release at this point. And two, it's trying to convey that it is militarily dominant over Ukraine.” But this narrative doesn’t hold up. As Heinrich elaborates, “I just want to remind our viewers, remember: Ukraine reclaimed, liberated, more than 50 percent of Russian-occupied territory that Russia has taken over the last three years, and destroyed a third of the Russian Black Sea fleet, and Ukraine doesn't even have a navy. So Ukraine is militarily significant. It's a drone superpower, and its people are resilient, and they're not going to give in. So this is not a Zelensky issue here in terms of the terms that he's willing to take. The entire Ukrainian population is behind him on this.”

The “Zelensky issue” refers to Trump’s recent suggestions that the Ukrainian leader is preventing peace rather than Putin. On Tuesday, after days of disparaging Zelensky, Trump claimed, “I think what's happening is that Russia would like to get it done. I think that, and you know, Russia is a big machine. They just keep grinding forward. And that's what they've done. They've taken a very large piece of land. And, you know, you can say that Ukraine is doing well or poorly, but the land gets bigger and bigger all the time, week by week. It's just they march forward. They just keep marching forward.” Here again, Fox News pushed back, posting, “The president insists Russia wants to reach a deal, even as he describes its military advancing week after week."

Later Tuesday, while discussing a proposal by Putin that he, Trump, and Chinese leader Xi Jinping hold a summit, ostensibly to discuss the war, Heinrich warned the move would be a “serious mistake,” saying, “The Russians view the United States as its number one adversary, and they're trying to get the United States to back down and not support Zelensky.” According to Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), “Putin is playing President Trump like a fiddle. And history is not going to look good on an America that failed to rise up and defend the Western world if Putin actually gets his way. And I believe that a summit with Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin, two countries who want to overwhelm the world, is absurd."

Trump blows up his own DOJ’s defense with one inconvenient post

President Donald Trump contradicted what his Justice Department lawyers told a federal judge with his own words on Truth Social in his latest self-own in a drawn-out court battle.

In an October 16 filing, government lawyers argued that plans to transform East Potomac Golf Links remained preliminary and that the president's public comments only showed that he gave the project a thought rather than an active plan.

However, in about 48 hours, Trump announced the Interior Department and architect Tom Fazio had "developed a plan" for a "World Class Championship Golf Course" in a Truth Social post. He added that the existing course would close on November 15 for a 15-month renovation and published a redesigned layout.

If that wasn’t enough to contradict his DOJ legal team, he later added: "Work is scheduled to begin IMMEDIATELY!"

That left the attorneys in a precarious position, with the U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes asking:

"Do I believe the president of the United States or do I believe you?" at Monday's hearing.

However, the DOJ still insisted that no plan existed despite Trump’s statement. The attorneys urged Reyes to treat Trump's posts like an executive order rather than a final plan.

After issuing notice late on Friday ahead of the holiday weekend, National Park Service personnel cut down about 400 trees at the old public course on October 10. Officials said the operation aligned with a 2019 landscape restoration report and had nothing to do with Trump’s redesign. Reyes took issue with that account and put a hold on any further tree removal.

Writing in Public Notice on Wednesday, legal analyst Liz Dye argued that the case showed a recurring approach, which is to tell judges government projects are too preliminary to stop, then go ahead with changes that are difficult to reverse.

It is also described as a step to override judicial authority. DOJ attorneys use the Administrative Procedure Act to argue that redesigning the course did not qualify as agency action, potentially limiting the court's ability to intervene. They also invoked separation-of-powers arguments, insisting judges should defer to executive decisions about federal property.

Dye described the argument as an extraordinary effort to place Trump's construction projects beyond judicial control.

Trump attacked Reyes as a "crazed lunatic" for pushing back on his administration's attempt to bypass the rule of law and maintained that the Interior could renovate the course without court approval.

The analysis concludes that while the golf course seems minor, Trump cared enough to lie about it in an ultimately futile attempt to sidestep federal law.

'Botched' plastic surgeon: Mocked Mar-a-Lago face actually 'well executed'

As jokes about the Donald Trump administration's aesthetic rage on, one Botched plastic surgeon says the latest viral memes are actually a bit far-fetched. The latest evidence of "Mar-a-Lago face" came after Barbera Thornhill was appointed as the newest member of the State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons. A photo of Thornhill was shared on X and received more than 20 million views.

More pictures followed on Instagram after Callista Gingrich, Newt Gingrich’s wife and Donald Trump’s ambassador to Switzerland, posted a photo of her with Thornhill that went viral, and Thornhill’s face generated comments, with social media users commenting on her “botched” appearance. Comments about her looking alien-like and comparing her face to a Halloween costume ran rampant, and comments about Trump appointees, specifically women, began receiving backlash against an aesthetic that has become known widely online as having a “Mar-a-Lago face.”

As for what constitutes a Mar-a-Lago face, the recipe involves high, dark, arched brows, injected lips, facial skin pulled tight, and barely open eyes that appear to have been pulled sideways and up. Even Meghan McCain shared criticism of the aesthetic, writing on X: “Republicans really need to elevate and highlight more women in our party who have NOT had bizarre or botched plastic surgery that is both distracting and made a mockery all over the internet.”

But Terry Dubrow, who worked on the reality series where he corrected plastic surgery nightmares, says photos circulating of the mocked Mar-a-Lago face of some of Trump's appointees are not the worst. “It’s very fun, particularly when you’re on one political side or another, to aim your criticism weapon at them and say, ‘Oh, look how bad their plastic surgery is,’” he said in an interview with Vanity Fair. “But it isn’t bad. From a technical point of view, it’s extraordinarily successful[.] The plastic surgery is super well executed.”

In fact, Dubrow says the aesthetic is a symbol of status in certain social circles on the East Coast. “I’m so successful. Everyone around me is successful. We do things to the extreme. We’re excessively rich. We’re excessively powerful,” he said. “If I’m going to have a facelift, I don’t want any laxity. If I’m going to have a brow lift, I want to have a brow lift; I want it up. [If] I’m going to have [an] upper-eye lift, take all the skin.”

But Dubrow does have some objections to the look, specifically for those who want to be pulled too tight, which he declines. He says those procedures, which are typically face lifts, can create severe complications. “I don’t like that aesthetic,” he noted.

Moody Trump’s short fuse haunts staff as final term crumbles into 'disaster'

President Donald Trump has been saddled with a "foul mood" and exhaustion for months, The Daily Beast's PunchUp reported, with one "prominent MAGA figure" describing how he has been crumbling as his life devolves into a "disaster."

In an exclusive report on Wednesday afternoon, The Daily Beast noted that Trump appears to be succumbing to the pressure of his administration's seemingly unending scandals, combined with the looming GOP wipeout in the midterms that he seems incapable of preventing.

"The 80-year-old’s administration has been beset by a series of scandals in the past two weeks alone, including being forced to fire his ambassador to Greece, Kimberly Guilfolye, for alleged financial misconduct, launching a White House probe into a distasteful feud between his MAGA allies Ric Grenell and Alina Habba, and dismissing White House press secretary Katie Zacharia within days of hiring her," the report detailed. "The looming specter of the midterms — less than two weeks away — has only served to shorten Trump’s fuse, with the president said to be increasingly frustrated by 'juvenile mistakes.'"

"He’s also just been in a s—— mood lately,” the anonymous MAGA insider with close connections to Trump told PunchUp. “It’s just one damn thing after another... Whether it’s the KG [Kimberly Guilfoyle] stuff, whether it’s the Rick Grenell and Alina Habba stuff, whether it’s Katie Zacharia, nothing is working the way it’s supposed to right now."

They continued: "Everybody goes through seasons in life where nothing is easy. That’s just part of life. Sometimes you go through times where every single little thing is a f—— disaster. We’ve all been there. I think it’s just put him in a foul mood. It’s put everybody else in a foul mood, too."

The report also noted that the insider expressed concern about Trump's "worrisome decline" in patience with those around him, with the abrupt firing of Zacharia after less than a week as White House press secretary being a prime example. The insider was critical of the president for pressing Zacharia into the role, arguing that he "kinda set her up for failure" and made the situation all the more "embarrassing" for her with his public statements about telling her to reconsider.

"I think that’s showing he’s got a shortness right now that he hasn’t had before," the source added. "This term, I think he’s had far more patience with this stuff, and that served him well. Some of the lack of patience may very well be because there’s no time for juvenile mistakes right now. We’re a couple of weeks away from the midterms."

Speaking on the midterms, they added: "We can get completely wiped out, and it wouldn’t shock me, and we could hold both houses, and it wouldn’t shock me."

MAGA’s 'last gasp': GOP insiders are cursing Trump’s plan

On Wednesday, new reporting revealed that MAGA insiders fear President Donald Trump’s go-to campaign strategy “doesn’t work anymore.” According to Michael Warren, politics editor at the conservative outlet the Dispatch, the plummeting impact and attendance at Trump’s rallies signal “MAGA’s last gasp.”

With pollsters forecasting a potential blue tsunami, writes Warren, “Trump is doing what he can, in the only way he knows how, to salvage his party’s hopes: holding primetime fly-in rallies that are focused on his favorite subject, himself.” While he has been relentless in his campaign schedule, however, “it’s far from clear that Trump barnstorming the country to stump for candidates will even help.” As one veteran GOP operative told him, “We’re f——. I don’t think rallies work anymore.”

For Warren, this raises an important question: “What good is showing up to do these rallies anymore, and at the eleventh hour?” He notes that many Republicans worry that their mission is doomed by Trump’s lack of party-building over the past two years as well as his endorsement of “subpar” candidates, with party insiders suspecting the rallies will do little to move the needle. Instead of focusing on the hard work of winning campaigns, like phone banking and door-knocking, in non-presidential years, and building party campaign infrastructure, Trump’s efforts have mostly involved flying into red states to churn out MAGA platitudes for those who already agree with him.

Warren says that raises another question: “What is the closing message for the Republican Party in these midterms?” The latest rallies have involved railing about the “woke mob," but Warren suggests that in the end, it all circles around to the same old “Make America Great Again” messaging that Trump has been pushing with diminishing returns for 10 years. “The details are different, specific to the state and the news and the whims of the president in the moment, but the song remains the same,” writes Warren. “The 2020 election. The ‘Dumbocrats.’ Fake news. The beautiful border wall. The low cost of gasoline (back during his first term, of course).” As Trump said at a rally in Greenville, North Carolina, “The oil is going to get down to where I had it. I had it down to $1.85 a gallon, and I’ll have it down to that number.”

But this sort of talk is falling flat now. Polls show that voters disapprove of Trump’s approach to everything from the economy to immigration to corruption. As a result, the president is increasingly turning back to his old refrains or trying new bribes. But as Warren concludes, “The only message, as it has been for a decade, is Trump. And as electoral disaster looms for the GOP, the party is only beginning to grapple with what the message will be afterward, on November 4 and in the months and years to come.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.