Resend Push Notification

Trump’s global oil crisis now the biggest in history: report

The global oil supply disruption brought on by Donald Trump's war against Iran is now the biggest crisis of its kind in history, according to a new report from CNBC, and it shows no signs of stopping anytime soon.

In the immediate aftermath of the U.S. and Israel's joint military strikes against the Middle Eastern nation last weekend, Iran ordered the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a body of water that connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea, through which nearly all of the Gulf States' crude oil is shipped to the rest of the world. This closure effectively halted shipments of around 20 percent of the world's oil supply and set gas prices skyrocketing at a time when consumers are still feeling the sting of inflation.

According to a new report from the Associated Press, the price of a barrel of crude oil peaked at nearly $120 as of Monday morning, before dipping back down to around $101, which still represents a spike of over 20 percent since the start of military operations in Iran. These soaring oil prices have had a disastrous impact on the broader global economy, with stock prices tumbling all over the world on Monday morning.

Citing a new report on the crisis from Rapidan Energy, CNBC on Monday reported that Trump's disruption of the global oil supply was now by far the worst in history. With 20 percent of the world's oil supply impacted, the current circumstances have more than doubled the impact of the Suez Canal crisis of 1956, after Britain, France and Israel invaded Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, which stifled roughly 10 percent of the supply. The report also noted that the current crisis is nearly three times as bad as the Arab oil embargo of 1973, which resulted in historically crippling oil shortages the world over.

What makes the Hormuz closure so much worse than past crises, according to Rapidan's report, is that now, there are far fewer spare reserves of petroleum to work with. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates hold most of the world's "swing capacity" of oil, according to CNBC, and they are two of the nations impacted by the current closure.

“The conflict has not only taken offline a historically high share of global supply – it has simultaneously disrupted the primary holders of spare capacity,” Rapidan's report explained. “The result is a market with no meaningful cushion. There is no swing producer positioned to step in.”

The Trump administration has reportedly floated the prospect of dipping into the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to bring prices down, though experts note that this supply is not nearly enough to offset the disruption caused by the closure of Hormuz.

'Everybody’s afraid not to wear them': Trump buys shoes for admin officials

President Donald Trump is buying expensive shoes for his advisors, and people are scared of not wearing them.

According to a bizarre Wall Street Journal report, during meetings, the 79-year-old president starts guessing people's shoe size and then orders them $145 pair of loafers known as Florsheims.

“Marco, JD, you guys have s—y shoes,” Trump told his vice president and Secretary of State. He then grabbed a catalogue. The report said that they were "deep in conversation," though it didn't say what was being discussed. Rubio was an 11.5 and Vance is a 13. A third person in the room, whom Vance wouldn't identify, wore a 7.

“The president kind of leans back in his chair and says, ‘You know you can tell a lot about a man by his shoe size,’ ” Vance recalled.

“It helps to be tall,” Trump told the men. “I don’t know, they’re big heels. They’re big heels. I mean, those were really up there.”

Rubio was mocked in New Hampshire in 2016 when he was caught wearing the Florsheims, which boast a nice heel giving some height to the wearer. Rubio is 5-foot-10 and the shoe "scandal" became known as "Bootgate." Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) faced his own "Bootgate" when he was spotted in 2023 wearing a heal on his shoe. Politico reported at the time that three expert shoemakers said that he was likely wearing "height boosters."

There have been at least four instances in which Trump lied about his height. He has long claimed to be 6-foot-3. But when he stands next to people who also say they are 6'3", he is shorter. Lawyer Christine Pelosi, daughter of former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Cal.), spotted Trump in a "kitten heel" in 2020 while he was viewing hurricane damage.

At least one Cabinet official is annoyed to slum it with the Florsheims, one person who heard his complaint told the Wall Street Journal that he was forced to shelve his Louis Vuittons, which typically run over $1,000, unless there is a sale.

“All the boys have them,” a female White House official remarked.

One joked, “It’s hysterical because everybody’s afraid not to wear them.”

The report said that the "shoe-salesman-in-chief is paying attention."

Menswear writer Derek Guy suggested that Trump try a higher-end brand, Alden Shoe Co., and be properly fitted. Trump's fashion has been mocked over the years, with suits that are too big, shoulder pads, and his signature red tie that is abnormally long. While Trump frequently wears a blue suit, he pairs it with black shoes, whereas most would pair blue with brown shoes.

“I don’t think it’s extravagant—for a billionaire," he quipped.

In a previous thread on X, Guy questioned some of Trump's fashion choices.

"Trump's tailoring is done in a way to conceal his weight. His shoulders are relatively narrow compared to his waist, which gives his body a somewhat rectangular shape," said Guy at the time. "As I've mentioned many times, the platonic male silhouette in classic Western aesthetic is a shoulder line that's broader than the waist, which creates a V-shaped figure. Since Trump doesn't naturally have this silhouette, his suits have an extended shoulder."

It causes a problem because you can only extend a shoulder so far, he explained.

The Journal didn't explain whether or not Trump was paying for the shoes himself or if these were taxpayer-funded shoes.

Republicans asked for it

When Republicans started calling our Defense Department the “Department of War” it probably should have been a dead giveaway for what was most assuredly coming next.

When the most bloodthirsty and immoral president in American history, Donald Trump, appointed a high-octane oil slick like Pete Hegseth to lead that shell-shocked department, it should have been dreadfully obvious that human beings, not soaring prices, would be under steady attack as long as this violent regime could hold onto power.

Just 14 months into his vile second term, consumer prices are rising quickly across the board, and we are at war seemingly everywhere because it turns out Trump is the most Republican president in my long lifetime. Trump, unlike his phony predecessors in the GOP like the Bushes, isn’t even pretending he gives a damn about the myriad issues that affect Americans’ daily lives, or even life itself for that matter.

Trump knows what his voters really like, and is delivering it to them wrapped cold in body bags.

When he said with a shrug last week after the first three troops were killed in his sinful Iran War, “There will likely be more [deaths] before it ends. That’s the way it is,” he was telling us just how little he values their lives.

Because that is how it really is with Republicans, and has been my entire life.

In Trump’s world there are the billionaire elites, who prop him up and fill both his bottomless pockets and unquenchable malignant narcissism to overflowing, and there are the expendable “suckers and losers” he abuses like so many of the women who have crossed his crooked path.

Trump and his Republicans don’t value life, they celebrate violence and death, and the more brutal and bloody it is the better. This really needs to be talked about more, because it is true, and that truth — like so many countless people and places around the globe and certainly right here in America — has taken one helluva beating the past decade ...

The “shock and awe” of the senseless War in Iraq was just a warm-up act for what we are getting right now from a monster who ran on “no new wars” but has now attacked eight different countries, on four different continents to give his electorate what they really want, but would prefer we didn’t talk about.

High prices, inflation, and affordability issues were just a polite front for what really gets their cold hearts beating: death, destruction, and plenty of it.

An NPR/PBS News/Marist poll released Friday revealed that 84 percent of Republicans favor this illegal war in Iran, because if they can’t have the lower prices they lied to us they cared about, they will damn sure get the pain and punishment they have proven they crave so much.

The truth is Republicans absolutely love this illegal war in Iran, because they will have the carnage from the racist, America-attacking thug they voted for not once, not twice, but three times.

Can we all finally admit that the cruelty really is the point with Republicans?

For the Republican voter, the 2024 election was never about lowering prices. Oh, sure, that would have been a nice little perk, but Trump’s appeal to the average Republican voter was always his unlimited capacity to say and do the very worst things on their behalf.

Instead of bringing them lower prices, he has brought them blood by the bucketful, via public beatings, and murders that make the hair on the back of their necks stand at attention.

Google “ICE beatings” and you can spend the rest of your day watching masked government agents slamming heads into concrete walls and sidewalks, throwing women into the street, dragging people out of their houses by their hair, and crying children being ripped from their parents’ arms.

These voters didn’t vote for Trump in spite of all those horrible things, they voted for him because of them.

No matter how high prices get, or how bad it gets for the working folk in America, Republicans can always, always, always count on their grotesque president taking their anger out on everybody else.

They concocted stories of brown and black boogeymen eating our dogs and cats so when the time came they could justify dehumanizing them and shooting and beating them to death.

The revolting Kristi Noem wasn’t fired this week because of any of the many heinous acts under her charge — including mass murder — at the out-of-control Department of Homeland Security (DHS). No, she was finally let go, because she gave herself, and not her orange, thin-skinned boss a starring role in an absurd $200 million-plus taxpayer-funded ad campaign.

The insane commercials feature the pie-eyed, flounder-lipped Noem celebrating herself by riding around Mount Rushmore on the back of a poor horse, whose life was in danger the minute she clapped a saddle on his back.

Noem did everything Trump wanted during her revolting tenure at DHS, except get caught, and I promise you that the average Republican voter still absolutely loves her for it.

Noem’s firing was no doubt instructive to Hegseth, who has been given carte blanche to devalue as many human lives as possible, including and mostly the troops under his charge, just as long as Trump gets all the credit for bringing the Republican voters the carnage they love.

It should be inconceivable that such a low form of life would be allowed within 1,000 miles of our armed forces, much less commanding them. Under Hegseth’s crooked charge, our military is no longer being ordered to honorably take the high ground, and are instead being threatened to go just as low as possible.

His very presence atop our Defense Department puts our troops in more and more danger each day, because mark my words, the time is coming when their adversaries will dish out the same terrible punishment to them that they have been ordered by Hegseth to inflict on others.

Most of us who wore the uniform in war and peace, did so because we believed in high ideals. We took an oath to follow the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and march in the footsteps of the thousands of brave souls who came before us, and stormed that beach, or bravely engaged that vaunted enemy carrier group.

War is hell, yes, but it is supposed to be fought with bravery, honor, and under the written laws that guide our military.

What would any of our prisoners of war through the years say about shooting men, who have long since surrendered and are helplessly clinging to the wreckage of a boat, pleading for their lives?

This is the type of thing coming for our troops if God forbid their vessel is ever blown to bits, or their boots ever hit the ground in Iran or elsewhere, because Hegseth and the draft-dodging Trump, have signaled to our enemies that our troops don’t matter much, and there are no longer any rules for engagement.

It is exactly what you would expect from a Commander-in-Chief, who disgraces the graves of our fallen and has never been brave enough to serve anybody but himself.

We are a nation at war with itself, and everybody around us, because that is exactly how the Republican Party likes it.

Violence, war and hate are their hallmarks, and the only things they have consistently delivered to the American public for the past 75 years.

There is nothing new about any of this, except that they’ve finally found a leader who can provide all that with a smile on his face.

D. Earl Stephens is the author of “Toxic Tales: A Caustic Collection of Donald J. Trump’s Very Important Letters” and finished up a 30-year career in journalism as the Managing Editor of Stars and Stripes. You can find all his work here, and follow him on Bluesky here.

'Wicked idiotic': Dunkin’ drinkers prep for battle in brewing White House coffee war

President Donald Trump's administration just started a war that it has no hope of winning, according to coffee drinkers. And it has nothing to do with the Middle East.

The Boston Globe reported Wednesday that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr. fired verbal shots at Dunkin' Donuts and Starbucks.

An Army veteran explained to those outside of New England that Dunkin' Donuts is to the northeast what In-N-Out is to California.

Dunkin' loyalists, in particular, rushed to social media with hostility after they felt shots were fired by HHS.

“We’re going to ask Dunkin’ Donuts and Starbucks, ‘Show us the safety data that show that it’s OK for a teenage girl to drink an iced coffee with 115 grams of sugar in it,’” Kennedy said. “I don’t think they’re gonna be able to do it.”

"This moron has no idea how much of a third rail this is. If he goes through with a public fight with Dunkin' he will never live this down. In the words of my people "f—— ya motha,'" Ben Collins, CEO of The Onion, wrote on BlueSky.

"Wicked idiotic," Wayne State University Law Professor Jen Taub agreed.

"I knew they’d go after the next Bluest city after they left Minneapolis… I didn’t think they’d go like this, watch out they’ll come for your chowder by nightfall," said radio commentator Dara Moskowitz Grumdahl.

"If Dunkin’ Donuts iced coffee is dangerous, I’m f—— Evel Knievel," quipped author Rob Delaney.

“Them’s fighting words, especially in Massachusetts,” one social media user wrote under the Globe's post on Facebook.

"I love the handful of people responding to this to say that Dunks is bad coffee. I don't think they understand that New Englanders' affection for Dunks is only incidentally related to the quality of their products," commented tech and crypto reporter Molly White. She later added, "Is it bad coffee? Yes. Do I love it? also yes."

"As a New Englander, I can say: Dunkin's default is to pour in way too much sugar, probably to mask the awful taste of their coffee," said American Progress senior fellow Topher Spiro. Physician, Dr. Ashish K. Jha, appeared to chastise or question him with one word. "Dude."

One woman couldn't help but key in on a specific element of Kennedy's comments. "Why is RFK Jr. focusing on the sugar intake of teenage girls over everyone else. Is that his id speaking? He never, ever fails to be a creeper."

Now we know why Savannah Guthrie’s mom is still missing

Until yesterday, it wasn’t clear to me why Savannah Guthrie’s mom was still missing nearly a month after her disappearance. Then came images Sunday of the FBI director, Kash Patel, partying with members of the US Olympic hockey team after they won the gold medal.

Then it all started to make sense.

Why wouldn’t Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapping remain unsolved given the country’s leading lawman doesn’t take the law seriously? He thinks the FBI gives him access to things other people can’t, as if law and order were an exclusive membership card to an elite club.

Meanwhile, real people suffer.

For all we know, Nancy Guthrie could be dead.

If you haven’t heard, Kash Patel took a taxpayer-funded jet to Italy to watch the men’s hockey final. His office said he was checking on security. His people accused reporters of lying when they reported the news. Their boss, with images of his partying, exposed their lies.

Sunday’s episode was only one instance of a larger pattern of lawlessness that's getting so big that the Times noted that Patel has “shown little willingness to curb or even conceal his jet-setting." He "has offered comparable explanations" (ie, lies) "to provide SWAT team protection for his girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, a country singer and rightwing activist, as well as for his heavy use of federal resources for travel that has at times appeared to blur professional lines.”

The Times said that "over the summer, he flew on a government jet from the Washington area to Inverness, Scotland, for a getaway at the exclusive golf resort, the Carnegie Club, with friends ... He has also taken flights, at taxpayer expense, to a private hunting ranch in Texas and to a wrestling match in State College, Pa., to watch a performance by Ms. Wilkins.

The Times and others say Patel’s bad behavior comes in spite of “multiple, fast-developing crises.” These include Americans in Mexico being told to shelter in place after a drug cartel leader was killed by the military. Closer to home, police killed a Florida man who tried to enter Mar-a-Lago with a shotgun and a gas can. Scott MacFarlane added more context:

The FBI is being pushed by Epstein survivors to do more to investigate some of the people … that have come out in the released batch of Epstein files, which show the circle that surrounded Jeffrey Epstein as he prayed on girls and young women. … All these things, not to mention crime nationwide, opioid crisis, gun crimes, child pornography, drug running, gun running, are happening as the FBI director is ... partying with his buddies.

But I think it’s the other way around. It’s not that Patel’s lawlessness is happening in light of these crimes. They are happening in light of his lawlessness. Why care about the law, or criminal consequences, when the country’s leading lawman shows so much contempt for it?

The Times reported that Patel was cheering Team USA when he tweeted that the FBI would dedicate “all necessary resources” to investigating the Mar-a-Lago incident. The implication is that he’s falling down on the job, as “all necessary resources” clearly didn’t include him.

But consider the message he's sending – that law enforcement is just empty talk. That's more consequential than falling down on the job. With his actions, Patel is saying that as long as you’re hooked up to the right people, you can do all the criming you want. Even if you’re not hooked up, just wait. When the cops are away, the criminals can come out to play.

This message was deepened by Patel’s (almost certainly fictional) claim that he was invited by the men’s hockey team to celebrate their victory with them. A different FBI director would have refused such an invitation out of concern that accepting it would not only compromise the bureau’s standing with the American people but also appear to encourage lawlessness. But public trust means little to a man who acts like he will never face public accountability.

Lawlessness isn’t harmless.

An FBI director who properly feared public accountability would never have let an Arizona sheriff investigate Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance without the FBI’s aid. He or she would have given Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos a choice: save yourself the humiliation of failure by accepting that the FBI is “the premier agency to deal with kidnappings,” as one expert described the bureau, or I will open my own investigation and guarantee your humiliation.

Instead, the FBI joined the investigation many days after Guthrie went missing, a debilitating loss of time, critics told the New York Post, that allowed for serious errors – for instance, surrendering the crime scene too soon, “with everyone from reporters to true-crime sleuths able to walk right up to Guthrie’s front door with no security or crime scene tape.”

As things stand, Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance is now approaching a month in duration. Her family seems increasingly desperate. Savannah Guthrie herself is forced to make public pleas to her mom’s kidnappers that yield no results. Nanos and Patel are both humiliated, but only Nanos, who faces future reelection as a sheriff, will be held accountable. Meanwhile, Patel jet-sets on the taxpayer dime, hastening the decline of public faith in law enforcement.

GOP 'angst': Startling signs show MAGA voters are refusing to show up to vote

Republicans are grappling with "startling" evidence that their most devoted MAGA voters are choosing to stay home, according to a report from Axios, with one party operative warning that they cannot "wish away" the trend.

Donald Trump has been hailed within the GOP for his remarkable ability to turn out infrequent voters, having built up a base that supports him more than the overall Republican Party. This trend is evident when comparing the turnout in his election years to that in midterms and off-year elections. Now, however, with Trump barred from seeking a third time, Axios on Tuesday reported that there is great "angst" in the GOP that they are about to have a major turnout problem with the next few elections, with evidence pointing to a resurgent Democratic base and increasingly "sleepy" MAGA voters.

"Republicans are getting crushed in scores of state and local races, raising deep concerns about a deflated base refusing to show up to vote even in the most pro-Trump areas," the report from Axios explained. "The numbers are startling. In race after race, Democrats are outpacing their 2024 performance by double digits, a clear sign of a yawning enthusiasm gap."

Across state and federal elections last year, Democratic candidates vastly overperformed former Vice President Kamala Harris's 2024 numbers, including by roughly 10 percent in the state races and nearly 14 percent in the races for the House and Senate. Meanwhile, according to the Tuesday report, the GOP's own internal polling suggests that past reports of waning Republican voter enthusiasm are accurate.

The opposing trends are most evident in two recent state elections, which saw Democrats pull off shock victories in districts that Trump dominated in 2024. Democrat Taylor Rehmet won a Texas state Senate seat by 14 points last month, in a district Trump carried by 17 points, a swing of over 30 points. More recently, Democrat Chasity Verret Martinez won a Louisiana state House seat by 24 points in a district Trump won by 13 points, in what Axios called a "landslide."

In light of their alarming internal polls on bruising losses like these in deep-red states, some in the GOP have attempted to write them off as flukes, the result of low-turnout local races without Trump on the ballot, which will not be reflective of bigger election cycles in 2026 and 2028.

"Let's not pretend a couple of low-turnout special elections suddenly signal a political earthquake," Mason Di Palma, communications director for the Republican State Leadership Committee, told Axios.

However, others in the party are warning that this trend cannot be ignored. They also argue that Trump's handling of issues like the economy and the Epstein files is actively decreasing his MAGA base's enthusiasm.

"While it is tempting for many in our party to wish away these results," an anonymous GOP operative told the outlet, "the pattern is clear that there is at least a current 10-point Democratic over-performance from Trump 2024 — and it's built on a fired-up Democratic base and a sleepy GOP base."

'Grifter in chief' already set to profit off of Palm Beach airport

On his way back home to Washington, President Donald Trump spoke to the press about how he would profit if the Palm Beach airport changed its name to honor him.

Attacked by Florida leaders as the "grifter in chief," Trump's trademark would allow him to profit from any and all airport merchandise bearing the airport's name.

So, Florida lawmakers proposed a slight amendment to the legislation, changing the name, that would bar anyone from profiting from name royalties, licensing, or trademark fees, according to Florida Politics.

State Sen. Shevrin Jones, the next Senate Democratic Leader, proposed the amendment that was shot down by Republicans.

Reports that he referenced show that Trump's intellectual property portfolio has "three trademark applications to reserve his name for use as the brand of an airport," said the news site.

“You say that you are allies. But I need you to be accomplices to the Black community,” he said.

“This (has) nothing to do with party (or) race. This has everything to do with the state of Florida figuring out what our litmus test is going to be when we say (what) enough is enough is supposed to be. I would think members, that this is where enough stops," Jones continued.

Sate senate Democratic leader Lori Berman pointed out that Palm Beach voted against Trump in the 2024 elections. The trademark issue, she said, was “very troubling.”

Fiscal conservative cheers GOP for standing up to Trump on key economic issue

A conservative commentator cheered the six Republican legislators who stood up to President Donald Trump on his tariff hikes — and expressed regret that more Republicans have not done likewise.

“Here are three cheers for the six House Republicans who voted with nearly all Democrats to repeal President Trump’s tariffs against Canada,” Merrill Matthews from the Texas state chair of Our Republican Legacy wrote for The Hill. “They bucked their party and their leadership, and especially Trump, to do the right thing.”

He added, “The shame isn’t that the six voted with Democrats, but that no other Republicans joined them.”

The six Republican House members in question include Don Bacon of Nebraska, Kevin Kiley of California, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Jeff Hurd of Colorado, Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania and Dan Newhouse of Washington. Each of them voted with the House Democrats to repeal Trump’s unilaterally levied tariffs against Canada, which the legislators argue are both un-Constitutional and economically harmful.

“I've heard clearly from small and large manufacturers as well as agricultural producers that these tariffs are hurting them,” Hurd told CNN’s Manu Raju last week. In his editorial, Matthews reinforces observations like those made by Hurd with hard data.

“Here’s the direct quote from Harvard’s ‘Tariff Tracker’ study Trump mentioned,” Matthews wrote, quoting them as saying “assuming full pass-through at the border and a 50 percent import cost share at the retail level, our results suggest that U.S. consumers paid up to 43 percent of the tariff burden, with the rest absorbed by U.S. firms.”

Matthews also quoted the Congressional Budget Office’s new study, which concluded “U.S. businesses will absorb 30 percent of the import price increases by reducing their profit margins; the remaining 70 percent will be passed through to consumers by raising prices,” as well as the New York Federal Reserve Bank, which reported “between January and August of last year Americans took 94 percent of the hit from Trump’s tariffs. During September and October, that ebbed to 92 percent, settling to 86 percent in November.”

Matthews acknowledged that “disagreeing with Trump is politically perilous” and said that, for this reason, “it is politically commendable that six Republicans were willing to run the Trump gauntlet or retire. As we head to the midterm elections, Republican incumbents will be running political ads claiming they have the courage to stand up to liberal Democrats.”

He concluded, “The real question is whether they have the courage to stand up to Trump when he’s wrong.”

Whereas Matthews argued it is treacherous for Republicans to oppose Trump, other conservatives have argued it is more dangerous to not oppose him on an issue as costly to ordinary people as his tariffs. Writing for The Bulwark last week, conservative pundit Mona Charen argued “voters are rarely able to connect policy to outcomes, but they have done so in the case of tariffs. Back in 2024, Americans were about equally divided on the question of trade, with some favoring higher tariffs and roughly similar numbers opting for lower tariffs.”

She concluded, “Experience has changed their views.” Reporting for the Financial Times, journalist Alan Beattie observed that “it's now implanted in public discourse that American companies and consumers, not foreigners, are paying the tariff costs.” Organizations whose constituencies largely supported Trump, such as farmers, are turning on the tariffs.

“The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association and its members cannot stand behind the president while he undercuts the future of family farmers and ranchers by importing Argentinian beef in an attempt to influence prices,” Colin Woodall, head of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, said in a statement.

Laura Loomer and Marjorie Taylor Greene spar over Trump GOP’s women problem

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) and activist Laura Loomer have continued their online fight Tuesday as the two clash over Greene's statements denouncing MAGA for mocking survivors of trafficker Jeffrey Epstein.

Greene noticed over the weekend that MAGA influencers appeared to be attacking or mocking Epstein survivors, who Greene reminded were once girls who were abused and trafficked.

This prompted backlash from Loomer, a staunch Trump defender, who wrote "Wow MTG is now a full-blown #MeToo Resist Lib. Her metamorphosis should be studied by psychiatrists."

It has prompted a back-and-forth, with Loomer punching up at the account that boasts 4 million more followers.

"As I said before, expect to see Marjorie Traitor Greene do nothing but attack President Trump all throughout 2026," Loomer said.

While there's no love lost between Greene and Trump, in her post over the weekend, she was talking about MAGA influencers.

"I have to admit I was wrong when I warned Trump and his senior staff to stay away from Laura Loomer," Greene wrote on X Tuesday, her remarks dripping with sarcasm.

"Her divisiveness, loyalty tests temper tantrums, Israel First agenda, and her manufactured bullshit she calls loomered have all been great for the party and the President! Laura is a two time Congressional candidate loser who has been seriously underestimated. PLEASE make her Chair of the RNC!" Green exclaimed.

"Wait that is not enough. Make her White House Chief of Staff!! How dare President Trump not reward his most loyal worshipper! Literally the self-appointed High Priestess of MAGA or MIGA or whatever this thing has mutated into. I can’t believe they haven’t even given Laura the most simple and basic of all things, White House press credentials. This is an outrage!!" she closed.

Greene has been saying for a few months that the GOP has a "woman problem." Namely, some in the GOP refuse to support Epstein abuse victims in an ongoing effort to protect Trump. Greene ran for office largly talking about QAnon conspiracy theories about a trafficking ring that existed and was run by Democrats. Epstein has since been discovered to have closer relationships with a number of Republicans and members of the far-right, including Trump advisor and former campaign manager Steve Bannon.

The Greene/Loomer feud is an ongoing battle that dates back to 2024 and possibly beyond.

Outcry after X removes video of JD Vance being booed at the Olympics

US Vice President JD Vance was booed at the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games in Italy on Friday, but at least one widely shared video of it was swiftly scrubbed from X, the social media platform controlled by former Trump administration adviser Elon Musk.

Acyn Torabi, or @Acyn, “is an industrialized viral-video machine,” the Washington Post explained last year, “grabbing the most eye-catching moments from press conferences and TV news panels, packaging them within seconds into quick highlights, and pushing them to his million followers across X and Bluesky dozens of times a day.”

In this case, Torabi, who’s now senior digital editor at MeidasTouch, reshared a video of the vice president and his wife, Usha Vance, being booed that was initially posted by filmmaker Mick Gzowski.

However, the video was shortly taken down and replaced with the text, “This media has been disabled in response to a report by the copyright owner.”

Noting the development, Torabi, said: “No one should have a copyright on Vance being booed. It belongs to the world.”

As of press time, the footage is still circulating online thanks to other X accounts and across other platforms—including a video shared on Bluesky by MeidasTouch editor in chief Ron Filipkowski.

The Vances’ unfriendly welcome came after a Friday protest in the streets of Milan over the presence of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Winter Olympics, with some participants waving “FCK ICE” signs.

The Trump administration has said the ICE agents—whose agency is under fire for its treatment of people across the United States as part of the president’s mass deportation agenda—are helping to provide security for the vice president and other US delegation members, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

The 8-hour sleep myth: How I learned everything I knew about sleep was wrong

I’ve always been at odds with sleep. Starting around adolescence, morning became a special form of hell. Long school commutes meant rising in 6am darkness, then huddling miserably near the bathroom heating vent as I struggled to wrest myself from near-paralysis. The sight of eggs turned my not-yet-wakened stomach, so I scuttled off without breakfast. In fourth grade, my mother noticed that instead of playing outside after school with the other kids, I lay zonked in front of the TV, dozing until dinner. “Lethargy of unknown cause,” pronounced the doctor.

High school trigonometry commenced at 7:50am. I flunked, stupefied with sleepiness. Only when college allowed me to schedule courses in the afternoon did the joy of learning return. My decision to opt for grad school was partly traceable to a horror of returning to the treadmill of too little sleep and exhaustion, which a 9-to-5 job would surely bring.

In my late 20s, I began to wake up often for a couple of hours in the middle of the night – a phenomenon linked to female hormonal shifts. I’ve met these vigils with dread, obsessed with lost sleep and the next day’s dysfunction. Beside my bed I stashed an arsenal of weapons against insomnia: lavender sachets, sleep CDs, and even a stuffed sheep that makes muffled ocean noises. I collected drugstore remedies -- valerian, melatonin, Nytol -- which caused me "rebound insomnia" the moment I stop taking them.

The Sleep Fairy continued to elude me.

I confessed my problem to the doctor, ashamed to fail at something so simple that babies and rodents can do it on a dime. When I asked for Ambien, she cut me a glance that made me feel like a heroin addict and lectured me on the dangers of “controlled substances.” Her offering of “sleep hygiene” bromides like reserving my bedroom solely for sleep was useless to a studio apartment-dweller.

Conventional medical wisdom dropped me at a dead end. Why did I need to use a bedroom for nothing but sleeping when no other mammal had such a requirement? When for most of history, humans didn’t either? Our ancestors crashed with beasties large and small roaming about, bodies tossing and snoring nearby, and temperatures fluctuating wildly. And yet they slept. How on earth did they do it?

A lot differently than we do, it turns out.

The 8-Hour Sleep Myth

Pursuing the truth about sleep means winding your way through a labyrinth of science, consumerism and myth. Researchers have had barely a clue about what constitutes “normal” sleep. Is it how many hours you sleep? A certain amount of time in a particular phase? The pharmaceutical industry recommends drug-induced oblivion, which, it turns out, doesn’t even work. The average time spent sleeping increases by only a few minutes with the use of prescription sleep aids. And -- surprise! -- doctors have linked sleeping pills to cancer. We have memory foam mattresses, sleep clinics, hotel pillow concierges, and countless others strategies to put us to bed. And yet we complain about sleep more than ever.

The blame for modern sleep disorders is usually laid at the doorstep of Thomas Edison, whose electric light bulb turned the night from a time of rest to one of potentially endless activity and work. Proponents of the rising industrial culture further pushed the emphasis of work over rest, and the sense of sleep as lazy indulgence.

But there’s something else, which I learned while engaged in a bout of insomnia-driven Googling. A Feb. 12, 2012 article on the BBC Web site, “The Myth of the 8-Hour Sleep,” has permanently altered the way I think about sleep. It proclaimed something that the body had always intuited, even as the mind floundered helplessly.

Turns out that psychiatrist Thomas Wehr ran an experiment back in the ‘90s in which people were thrust into darkness for 14 hours every day for a month. When their sleep regulated, a strange pattern emerged. They slept first for four hours, then woke for one or two hours before drifting off again into a second four-hour sleep.

Historian Roger Ekirch of Virginia Tech would not have been surprised by this pattern. In 2001, he published a groundbreaking paper based on 16 years of research, which revealed something quite amazing: humans did not evolve to sleep through the night in one solid chunk. Until very recently, they slept in two stages. Shazam.

In his book At Day's Close: Night in Times Past, Ekrich presents over 500 references to these two distinct sleep periods, known as the “first sleep” and the “second sleep,” culled from diaries, court records, medical manuals, anthropological studies, and literature, including The Odyssey. Like an astrolabe pointing to some forgotten star, these accounts referenced a first sleep that began two hours after dusk, followed by waking period of one or two hours and then a second sleep.

This waking period, known in some cultures as the “watch," was filled with everything from bringing in the animals to prayer. Some folks visited neighbors. Others smoked a pipe or analyzed their dreams. Often they lounged in bed to read, chat with bedfellows, or have much more refreshing sex than we modern humans have at bedtime. A 16th-century doctor’s manual prescribed sex after the first sleep as the most enjoyable variety.

But these two sleeps and their magical interim were swept away so completely that by the 20th century, they were all but forgotten.

Historian Craig Koslofsky delves into the causes of this massive shift in human behavior in his new book, Evening's Empire. He points out that before the 17th century, you’d have to be a fool to go wandering around at night, where ne’er-do-wells and cutthroats lurked on pitch-black streets. Only the wealthy had candles, and even they had little need or desire to venture from home at night. Street lighting and other trends gradually changed this, and eventually nighttime became fashionable and hanging out in bed a mark of indolence. The industrial revolution put the exclamation point on this sentence of wakefulness. By the 19th century, health pundits argued in favor of a single, uninterrupted sleep.

We have been told over and over that the eight-hour sleep is ideal. But in many cases, our bodies have been telling us something else. Since our collective memory has been erased, anxiety about nighttime wakefulness has kept us up even longer, and our eight-hour sleep mandate may have made us more prone to stress. The long period of relaxation we used to get after a hard day’s work may have been better for our peace of mind than all the yoga in Manhattan.

After learning this, I went in search of lost sleep.

Past Life Regression

“Even a soul submerged in sleep
is hard at work and helps
make something of the world.”
― Heraclitus, Fragments

What intrigued me most about the sleep research was a feeling of connection to ancient humans and to a realm beyond clock-driven, electrified industrial life, whose endless demands are more punishing than ever. Much as Werner Herzog’s documentary Cave of Forgotten Dreams pulls the viewer into the lives of ancient cave dwellers in southern France who painted the walls with marvelous images, reading about how our ancestors filled their nights with dream reflection, lovemaking and 10-to-12 hour stretches of down-time produced a strange sense of intimacy and wonder.

I’m a writer and editor who works from home, without children, so I’ve had the luxury, for the last couple of weeks, of completely relinquishing myself to a new (or quite old) way of sleeping. I’ve been working at a cognitive shift – looking upon early evening sleepiness as a gift, and plopping into bed if I feel like it. I try to view the wakeful period, if it should come, as a magical, blessed time when my email box stops flooding and the screeching horns outside my New York window subside.

Instead of heading to bed with anxiety, I’ve tried to dive in like a voluptuary, pushing away my guilt about the list of things I could be doing and letting myself become beautifully suspended between worlds. I’ve started dimming the lights a couple of hours after dusk and looking at the nighttime not as a time to pursue endless work, but to daydream, drift, putter about, and enter an almost meditative state.

The books I’ve been reading in the evening hours have been specially chosen as a link to dreamy ruminations of our ancestor’s “watch” period. Volumes like Norman O. Brown’s Love’s Body or Eduardo Galeano’s Mirrors provide the kind of reflective, incantatory experience the nighttime seems made for. Freud’s Interpretation of Dreams would be another excellent choice, and I know from experience that reading it before bedtime triggers the most vivid mental journeys.

In sleep, we slip back to a more primitive state. We go on a psychic archaeological dig. This is part of the reason that Freud proclaimed dreams to be the royal road to the unconscious and lifted his metaphors from the researchers who were sifting through the layers of ancient history on Egyptian digs, uncovering relics and forgotten memories. Ghosts flutter about us when we lie down to rest. Our waking identities dissolve, and we become creatures whose rhythms derive from the moon and the seas much more than the clock and the computer.

As we learn more, we may realize that giving sleep and rest the center stage in our lives may be as fundamental to our well-being as the way we eat and the medicines that cure us. And if we come to treasure this time of splendid relaxation, we may have much more to offer in the daytime hours.

Trump just issued a foul warning

On Christmas of all days, Donald Trump chose to call Democrats “scum.” Not criminals. Not misguided. Not wrong. Scum. A word we usually reserve for things we scrape off the bottom of a shoe or skim off polluted water. A word whose entire purpose is to dehumanize.

That moment matters far beyond the day’s news cycle, and far beyond partisan politics. It matters because leaders don’t just govern; they model.

Psychologists and social and political scientists have long pointed out that national leaders function, at a deep emotional level, as parental figures for their nations. They set the boundaries of what is acceptable. They establish norms. They shape the emotional climate children grow up breathing.

America has lived through this before, both for good and, now, for ill.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt understood this instinctively. In the depths of the Great Depression and the terror of World War II, he spoke to the country as a calm, steady parent. His fireside chats didn’t just convey policy; they conveyed reassurance, dignity, and solidarity.

He treated Americans as adults capable of courage and sacrifice. He named fear without exploiting it. The result was not weakness, but national resilience.

A generation raised under that moral tone went on to build the modern middle class, defeat fascism, and help construct a postwar world that valued democracy, human rights, and shared prosperity.

Contrast that with the bigoted, hateful, revenge-filled claptrap children have heard for the past decade from the emotionally stunted psychopath currently occupying the White House. Hours after calling you and me “scum,” he put up another post calling us “sleazebags.”

How presidential.

Presidents like Dwight D. Eisenhower warned Americans about the dangers of concentrated power and the military-industrial complex, modeling restraint and foresight.

John F. Kennedy appealed to service, famously asking what we could do for our country. Lyndon Johnson, for all his flaws, used the moral authority of the presidency to push civil rights forward, telling America that discrimination was not just illegal but wrong.

Even Ronald Reagan, whose policies I fiercely opposed, spoke a language of civic belonging and optimism rather than open dehumanization.

Go back further, to the Founders themselves, and George Washington warned against factional hatred and the corrosive effects of treating political opponents as enemies rather than fellow citizens.

John Adams argued that a republic could only survive if it was grounded in virtue and moral responsibility. Thomas Jefferson wrote that every generation must renew its commitment to liberty, not surrender it to demagogues who feed on division.

They all understood something Trump doesn’t, or is so obsessively wrapped up in himself and his own infantile grievances that he doesn’t care about: the psychological power of example.

Donald Trump has spent ten years modeling for America the exact opposite of leadership.

Ten years of cruelty framed as strength.

Ten years of mockery, insults, and grievance elevated to the highest office in the land.

Ten years of praising strongmen, including Putin, Xi, and Orbán, while attacking democratic institutions.

Ten years of targeting Hispanics, Black Somali immigrants, demonizing refugees, and encouraging suspicion and hatred toward entire communities.

And now he’s giving us the example of using ICE not simply as a law enforcement agency, but as a masked, armed, unaccountable weapon of state terror aimed not only at brown-skinned families, but at journalists, clergy, lawyers, and anyone else who dares to document their abuse.

Kids graduating from high school this year have never known anything else. That fact should alarm every parent.

Children learn what leadership looks like long before they understand policy debates. They absorb emotional cues, and notice who gets rewarded and who gets punished.

When a president calls fellow Americans “scum” and suffers no consequences, the lesson is clear: cruelty is permissible if you have power. Empathy is expendable. Democracy is a nuisance. Accountability is optional.

This is how normalization works. What once would have been unthinkable becomes routine. The outrage dulls. The abnormal becomes background noise. And a generation grows up believing this is simply how adults in authority behave.

History tells us where that road leads: dehumanizing language precedes dehumanizing actions.

Every authoritarian movement begins by teaching people to see their neighbors as less than fully human. Once empathy vanishes, abuses become easier to justify, and violence becomes easier to excuse.

That’s why we all — parents, grandparents, and citizens — have a special responsibility right now.

We can’t assume our nation’s children will automatically recognize how dangerous and abnormal this moment is; instead, we have to name it for them.

We have to tell them, plainly and repeatedly, that this is not what healthy leadership looks like.

That calling people “scum” and “sleazebags” is not strength. That praising autocrats while undermining democracy is not patriotism. That power without empathy is not leadership; it’s merely a simple pathology known as psychopathy.

And we must model something better ourselves.

Disagree without dehumanizing. Stand up without tearing others down. Teach that democracy, in order to work, depends on mutual recognition of one another’s humanity.

Remind our kids that America has, in its best moments, been led by people who understood their role as moral examples, not just political operators.

And that when CBS, Fox “News,” the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, Facebook, X, and other billionaire-owned rightwing media and social media pretend this is normal, they’re spitting on the graves of our Founders and participating in a gross violation of the basic norms of human decency.

Trump’s Christmas message wasn’t just offensive. It was a warning.

The future lays before us now, and if we care about the country our children will inherit, we can’t let this moral vandalism to go unanswered.

'Trump is collapsing' — but MAGA isn’t ready to bail

As support for President Donald Trump continues to collapse, the question remains as to whether he can regain control or instead plummet in a devastating crash, according to Salon's senior politics writer Chauncey DeVega.

"Trump’s softening support is amplified by growing rumors about his health and reports on his reduced public schedule. Even the mainstream media noticed that he repeatedly appeared to fall asleep during Tuesday’s Cabinet meeting," DeVega notes.

"While he sends out numerous social media posts in the middle of the night, he seems increasingly disconnected from real-world events by daylight," he writes.

Recent murmurs of Trump's failing health and a mysterious MRI scan also contribute to the disconnect, DeVega says.

"Any appearance of physical weakness or frailty in a man who is nearly 80 years old, threatens to undermine his carefully constructed persona as a vital and dynamic political strongman," DeVega adds.

But no matter how much "rage-bait" Trump posts, it's not taking away from his inability to convince Americans that his policies are popular.

"But none of Trump’s attention-seeking behavior changes the fact that across a range of polls, his policies — including on his supposed signature issues, such as immigration and the economy — are broadly and increasingly unpopular," DeVega says.

"This includes a historic first: Trump now has a net negative approval rating across all the major polls aggregated by the New York Times, and has the second-lowest poll numbers for any president since World War II," he adds.

Democrats now lead Republicans by 14 points in polls asking who Americans will vote for in the 2026 midterms.

"That historically large gap suggests that Democrats are well-positioned to win a House majority, and perhaps even the Senate," DeVega says.

Trump, however, doesn't care about the approval of the American people, DeVega writes.

"But at the end of the day, Trump rules only for Republican base voters, especially his most faithful MAGA followers — and most important of all, to advance his own corrupt interests," he says.

And among those followers, DeVega says, Trump is "still winning: His popularity among Republican voters is 88 percent, a net loss of just six points since his inauguration in January."

But again, DeVega writes, that's not really winning when "key parts of Trump’s winning 2024 coalition are not happy."

Male Latino voters are turning away from the president due to his immigration policies and young voters are doing the same due to a "worsening job market," DeVega explains.

"In the wake of the longest-ever government shutdown, a poll from AP-NORC shows Trump losing significant support among Republicans because of his catastrophic and incompetent management," DeVega says.

"Among other issues, the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, incoherent tariff policies, Russia’s war in Ukraine, the increasingly controversial attacks on alleged Venezuelan 'narcoterrorists' and the ongoing Middle East crisis are dragging down Trump’s support among Republicans, as well as voters in general," he adds.

That said, CNN political analyst Harry Enten still maintains that Republican voters are "rock solid for Trump."

"MAGA is a personality cult and pseudo-populist movement constructed around a single individual. His followers’ relationship with him is intense and highly emotional. As social psychologists and other experts have explored, MAGA believers are psychologically adhered to their leader and to their movement as a community and identity," DeVega explains.

Historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat explains the dynamic, saying, "For hard-core MAGA, the realization that all is not as it seemed will be frightening, and the knowledge will be initially dismissed. Throughout 2026 we can look forward to redoubled efforts by pro-government propaganda outlets such as Fox to cast defectors and doubters in a negative light."

DeVega says this makes things murky when it comes to MAGA and its undying support for an historically unpopular president.

"Trump is crashing in the polls; that is not an illusion. His most loyal followers will never abandon him, but it’s unclear whether they can boost him back to political dominance," DeVega says.

'Free-range Trump' has turned his presidency into an 'adult fantasy camp': analysis

Instead of focusing on governing, President Donald Trump spends his days chasing entertainment, attention and renovation projects that reflect a presidency stuck in adolescence, writes Politico's Jonathan Martin.

"Trump is living his best life in this second and final turn in the White House. Coming up on one year back in power, he’s turned the office into an adult fantasy camp, a Tom Hanks-in-Big, ice-cream-for-dinner escapade posing as a presidency," Martin writes.

"The brazen corruption, near-daily vulgarity and handing out pardons like lollipops is impossible to ignore and deserves the scorn of history. How the president is spending much of his time reveals his flippant attitude toward his second term. This is free-range Trump. And the country has never seen such an indulgent head of state," he adds.

Not to make light of Trump's actions, Martin compares him to the authoritarian leader of Hungary, saying, "yes, he’s one-part Viktor Orbán, making a mockery of the rule of law and wielding state power to reward friends and punish foes while eroding institutions."

But despite that, Martin says, Trump is "also a 12-year-old boy: There’s fun trips, lots of screen time, playing with toys, reliable kids’ menus and cool gifts under the tree — no socks or trapper keepers."

In addition to toddleresque outbursts, Trump, he writes, has play-time, noting all his appearances at various sporting events, "but Trump's cavorting goes well past sports" he says.

"A celebration of the U.S. Navy’s 250th anniversary in Norfolk becomes an excuse to preen on an aircraft carrier and commandeer the ship’s PA system to do a now-hear-this riff, as if Chris Farley had come back to life and was doing a Trump bit," Martin says.

"Any excuse to hang out with the celebrities who will be seen with him is taken, whether it’s Sly Stallone, Kid Rock or Andrea Bocelli crooning in the Oval. And hey, isn’t that Vince Vaughn?" he adds.

America's allies and foes have taken note of Trump's adolescent leanings, too, Martin says.

"Not surprisingly, companies and countries have figured out what animates Trump, same as every adolescent: presents," he writes, noting that "the Brits present a gilded invitation to Windsor Castle, the Qataris offer a tricked-out plane and most every other country pitches their golf courses whenever he wants to come."

"And these nations know not to serve him foie gras. Catering to Trump’s forever-young palate, the South Koreans offered beef patties with ketchup and gold-embossed brownies to the American president in October," he adds.

But when Trump isn't tottering around, what holds his attention, Martin says, "is the sandbox once known as The White House."

"It started with the gateway drug of a larger flagpole, then moved onto paving over the Rose Garden, and now he is constructing a massive ballroom in what used to be the East Wing that will tower over the rest of the building," he writes.

"Lest you think he can be satisfied with just one property renovation, look no further than his Oval Office desk, which includes a model of the Arc de Trump he wants to build between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington House," Martin snickers.

As for Trump's other priorities, well, not so much, he notes.

"Why be bothered to know the basic details of a potential healthcare planhomework! — when you can do L’Enfant cosplay?" he quips.

Trump, he writes, "has no more interest in open government than a for whatever executive order he is ostensibly there to promote or a foreign leader whose name he can’t always summon. The point is to see himself on TV."

Trump, like most kids, also loves screen time on his electronic devices, spending "so much time on social media, posting all manner of content his parents would disapprove of if they found his account," Martin says.

But it's not all recess for Trump, Martin says.

"There are chores Trump can’t get out of. Yet even his most substantive work is driven by a longing for validation — namely the quest to be viewed as a great president, as he thinks a Nobel Peace Prize or his big, beautiful head on Mount Rushmore would confer," he writes.

"However, even the most acute case of arrested development can’t slow age. And the older one gets, the more they reflect their true selves. Trump will be 80 next year. Why would Republicans think he’d grow up now?" he concludes.

How leaders of a Minnesota church enabled a child abuser

Our investigation of a little-known church community in northeastern Minnesota started with something that has become depressingly familiar: child sex abuse.

ProPublica and the Minnesota Star Tribune found that some members of the Old Apostolic Lutheran Church community in Duluth enabled Clint Massie, who pleaded guilty to sexually abusing young girls. Massie is currently in prison in Faribault, Minnesota.

The Old Apostolic Lutheran Church — which has no affiliation with mainstream Lutheran denominations and is known as the OALC — is an insular community with many old-world traditions. There is no official count, but one academic study estimated 31,000 members worldwide as of 2016, with most in the United States.

We examined hundreds of pages of criminal records, conducted more than a dozen interviews with alleged victims across the country, reviewed video and audio of police interviews with Massie, victims and church leaders, and attended a service at the Old Apostolic Lutheran Church in Duluth.

Daryl Bruckelmyer, an OALC preacher, declined to comment or answer a detailed list of questions for this story. But in a 2023 interview with a St. Louis County detective, he acknowledged knowing about Massie’s sexual abuse. He said at the time that it was up to victims to report the crimes to police, a clear misreading of the law for mandated reporters — doctors, teachers and others who are required to report crimes against children.

“We don’t protect either one,” Bruckelmyer said of sexual abusers and their victims.

You can read the investigation here, but here are five takeaways from our reporting:

Church leaders knew about the abuse: Leaders of Bruckelmyer’s church didn’t report Massie to police though they knew he’d sexually abused girls for years and Bruckelmyer had been told by police that reporting it was their duty. It was an open secret in the congregation: Mothers warned their children to stay away from Massie, victims said. Church leaders also sent Massie to a therapist who specialized in sex offender treatment. In December 2024, Massie pleaded guilty to four felony counts of sexual conduct with a victim under the age of 13. In March, a judge sentenced him to 7 1/2 years in prison.

Victims were told to forgive and forget: Church leaders held meetings where children were told to forgive the man who sexually abused them and forget the abuse. If they spoke of it, the sin would be theirs. The meetings, described by victims to the police and confirmed through our reporting, ended in one case with a church leader allowing Massie to hug the victim. An internal church document also outlines guidelines for handling abuse and suggests that, when appropriate, both parties be brought together for a discussion.

Missed opportunities to intervene: Prosecutors had at least one opportunity to intervene but hoped educating church leaders about their duties would encourage them to cooperate with authorities. Our reporting found that church leaders did not report what they learned about Massie despite a state law requiring clergy and others to share the information with law enforcement. According to law enforcement notes, Bruckelmyer told investigators that they encourage abuse victims to go to police, but that they believed it was “on [victims] to do that.”

John Hiivala, a spokesperson for the Woodland Park Old Apostolic Lutheran Church in Duluth, said that the church “has fully complied with the law in the referenced case, and it’s a matter of legal record.”

Kimberly Lowe, a lawyer and crisis manager for the church, said its preachers are unpaid and therefore might not be legally required to report sexual abuse of children. Asked if she believes the preachers are mandated reporters under Minnesota law, Lowe would only say that the language of the statute is unclear.

A small but rapidly growing church: OALC is a conservative Christian revival movement that came to the U.S. with 19th-century settlers from Norway, Finland and Sweden. It is not affiliated with any mainstream Lutheran denominations. Only men hold leadership positions. The church is rapidly growing, and its emphasis on large families has created booms in places like Washington state and Duluth. Members attempt to live a life as modest and simple as Jesus’. This is why they do not dance, listen to music or watch movies, according to former members. In the OALC, they said, forgiveness is one of the most important acts one can perform.

Victims filed lawsuits: Since Massie’s sentencing, two of his alleged victims have filed lawsuits against him, their church in South Dakota and the OALC. They have retained the same lawyer who represented some of the victims in the Jeffrey Epstein case.

In a letter written from prison that was filed in court, Massie denied the abuse allegations in the lawsuits. He did not respond to interview requests. The OALC, in a motion to dismiss both lawsuits, wrote that “while OALC-America is mindful and sympathetic to Plaintiff for the abuse Plaintiff alleges occurred by Massie, such empathy does not take away from the plain fact that this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over OALC-America.”

Trump isn't aging well and there's a obvious reason why

I recently had a minor health scare — not unusual when you’re pushing 80. Everything is fine, at least for now.

But it got me thinking.

Trump is 10 days older than me. He doesn’t look the model of robust health.

Even though we’re almost the same age, Trump has one big health problem I don’t have: his hatefulness.

“I hate my opponents,” he says.

Hate is a corrosive. It eats away at one’s health. It attacks a hater’s central nervous system by releasing stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline. It compromises a hater’s cardiovascular system with high blood pressure and heart disease. It weakens immune systems, making the hater more vulnerable to all sorts of illnesses. It weakens gastro-intestinal systems, causing stomachaches, nausea, and other digestive problems. It leads to difficulties falling and staying asleep. It causes muscle tensions that harm the jaw and neck, such as clenching and teeth grinding, and contributes to headaches and migraines.

On Friday, Trump spent roughly three hours at the Bethesda Naval Hospital for what his doctor, Navy Capt. Sean Barbabella, called a “scheduled follow-up evaluation.” (While there, anti-vaxxers please note, Trump also got his yearly flu shot, as well as a COVID-19 booster.)

The White House initially described Trump’s Walter Reed visit as a “routine yearly checkup,” although Trump had his annual physical in April. The White House then called the Walter Reed visit a “semiannual physical.”

Even without hate, a body nearing 80 suffers from the wear and tear that accompany aging.

When I get together with old friends, our first ritual is an “organ recital” — how’s your back? Knee? Heart? Hip? Shoulder? Hearing? Prostate? Hemorrhoids? Digestion?

The recital can run — and ruin — an entire lunch.

I doubt Trump does organ recitals with old friends. That’s because I don’t think he has old friends.

When it comes to other people, Trump isn’t relational. He’s transactional. Every interaction is a deal. Transactions don’t foster friendships.

Yet as gerontologists will tell you, one of the most important ways of keeping healthy in later years is through good friendships.

Another thing I’ve been noticing when I get together with old friends is the subtle and awkward issue of mental decline.

It doesn’t arise directly. We don’t ask each other, “So, how’s the dementia coming along?” Instead, we quietly listen and notice: Are words garbled? Thoughts coherent? Syntax reasonable?

I’m becoming more forgetful. I make long lists trying to coax myself into remembering what I’m supposed to. Then I forget where I put the lists.

Inevitably, minds begin to go. Trump’s seems to be disappearing at a particularly rapid rate. Just get a transcript of the full remarks he made several weeks ago to the military top brass. It has dementia written all across it.

At Trump’s April physical, he passed a short screening test to assess brain functions. Beforehand, Trump bragged about how well he had done on his last cognitive test. “I had a perfect score. And one of the doctors said he’s almost never seen a perfect score. I had a, had a perfect score. I had the highest score. And that made me feel good.”

Let me ask you: Do you consider someone mentally healthy who needs to constantly and continuously brag about himself?

Another important way of measuring mental health is one’s sense of humor — especially of the self-deprecating sort. As I age, I’ve found that the sharpest of my friends have retained great capacities to laugh at themselves.

I don’t believe I’ve ever seen or heard Trump make a joke at his own expense. In fact, as far as I can tell, he has no sense of humor.

Probably the best predictor of how long you’ll live is how long your parents lived. Genes aren’t everything, but they’re almost everything.

My mother died at the age of 86. She was unwell for the last two years of her life. My father stuck around until two weeks before his 102nd birthday, and his mind remained sharp as a tack.

Trump’s mother died at the age of 88; his father at 93. Fred Trump was diagnosed with Alzheimers at the age of 86.

Three score and ten is the number of years of life set out in the Bible. Modern technology and Big Pharma should add at least a decade and a half, unless RFK Jr. has his way. It’s now thought a bit disappointing if a person dies before 85.

But as one approaches 80, it’s not just lifespan that looms. It’s also health span — how many years you feel good, feel able, have your wits about you.

If Trump can cause as much mayhem and suffering as he’s doing every day, I can at least keep writing and talking about how horrific he is, every day.

After all, I’m 10 days younger than him.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

This is how the great sleeping giant of America awakens, roars and puts an end to it

Something dramatic has happened.

Many people who consider themselves non-political or independent, or moderate Republican, or who even voted for Trump last November, can’t avoid seeing what’s now come so clearly into the open.

And they’re finding it terrifying.

They’ve watched Trump order the Texas National Guard into Portland and Chicago, over the objections of the mayors of those cities and the governors of Oregon and Illinois. They’ve heard him call for jailing the mayor of Chicago and governor of Illinois for opposing these moves.

They’ve heard him threaten to invoke the Insurrection Act and send federal troops all over America.

They’ve watched Trump’s ICE agents drag people out of their beds in the middle of the night, zip-tie them and their children, and haul them away.

They’ve seen Trump’s prosecutors indict the attorney general of New York state because she held Trump accountable for fraud. And seen him threaten to do the same to a California senator because he conducted hearings in the House exposing Trump’s role in the attack on the Capitol.

They’ve heard Trump say he can kill anyone who he claims is an enemy combatant trafficking drugs.

They’ve heard Trump direct the IRS, FBI, and Justice Department against liberal groups that oppose him — George Soros’s Open Society Foundation; ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising organization; Indivisible, the community-based resistance organization.

And they watched him take off the air comedians who criticize him — Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel.

All across America, millions of people who have avoided politics, or identified as independents or moderate Republicans or even Trump voters, are shaken by what they’re seeing and hearing.

It’s no longer Democrat versus Republican or left versus right.

It’s now democracy versus dictatorship. Right versus wrong.

It’s no longer a war on undocumented immigrants. It’s now a war on Americans.

It’s no longer a foreign enemy. It’s now the “enemy within.”

Across the land, average Americans are realizing that they too could be dragged out of their homes in the middle of the night by Trump’s ICE agents, or tear-gassed and arrested by Trump’s National Guard, or targeted by Trump’s prosecutors, or shot by Trump’s military.

The Big Reveal is that all of us are now endangered.

Multiple polls show Trump’s approval tanking, but I think it runs deeper than this.

Something dramatic has happened over the last two weeks — as America sees more vividly than ever who Trump is, where he and his trio of lapdogs (Miller, Vought, and Vance) want to take the country, and how we’re all potential targets.

The Big Reveal is impossible not to see. Trump and his lapdogs are doing all of this completely in the open. They have no shame.

Most Americans abhor what they see, because what they see is abhorrent.

This is how the great sleeping giant of America awakens, roars, and puts an end to it.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

The Supreme Court just gave Trump a 'license to kill' — and he's using it: analysis

When the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its controversial 6-3 immunity ruling in Trump v. the United States in 2024, some scathing dissent came from one of the Barack Obama appointees: Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who warned that the decision gave the federal government's executive branch way too much power.

The High Court's GOP-appointed supermajority ruled that U.S. presidents enjoy absolute immunity for "official" acts committed in office but not for "unofficial" acts. And Sotomayor argued that using that standard, a president could assassinate a political rival, claim it was an "official" act, and enjoy total immune from criminal prosecution. Progressive legal expert Elie Mystal, a vehement critic of the decision, warned that there is a huge difference between "qualified immunity" and "absolute immunity" — and Trump v. the United States promised U.S. presidents absolute immunity.

In an article published on October 4, Salon's Heather Digby Parton emphasizes that the High Court's decision makes President Donald Trump's military actions against Venezuelan boats all the more dangerous.

"What happens when a leader of a democratic country believes he has a license to kill and proceeds to use it?," Parton warns. "It appears we are finding out. During the arguments in Donald J. Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court case that conferred immunity from prosecution for presidents committing crimes in the course of their official duties, the prospect of a president ordering Seal Team Six to carry out assassinations of political opponents was raised to illustrate the breadth of powers being considered. …. Right now, we are being forced to consider whether the president of the United States can legally order the military to murder 'non-international' civilians he has unilaterally declared to be drug trafficking terrorists."

Parton notes that on Friday, (October 3), U.S. forces "launched a strike on a boat off the coast of Venezuela that the administration claimed was trafficking drugs.

"Four people were killed, bringing the total number of casualties from all four strikes to 21," Parton observes. "As he has done with each operation, Trump took to Truth Social to brag: 'A boat loaded with enough drugs to kill 25 TO 50 THOUSAND PEOPLE was stopped, early this morning off the Coast of Venezuela, from entering American Territory.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth chimed in on X, 'Four male narco-terrorists aboard the vessel were killed in the strike and no U.S. forces were harmed in the operation.' No evidence has been provided about the alleged drug trafficking operations."

Parton continues, "When questions have been raised about the legality of the strikes, the (Trump) Administration has brushed them aside. No evidence has been provided about the alleged drug trafficking operations…. Since we have not heard of any member of the military objecting to this action, it would seem that the reassurances we all received that the military would never agree to undertake an illegal order were a bit overblown. They are murdering civilians on the high seas on the president's order."

Heather Digby Parton's full article for Salon is available at this link.

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

Silicon Valley's 'sickening' capitulation to Trump is a 'tyrant’s best weapon': tech exec

Former Google and Apple executive Kim Scott says in an op-ed in The New York Times that watching the intersection between the tech world and President Donald Trump echoes "the pain of watching Russia lose its briefly held freedoms."

Scott, who lived and worked in Russia, says Russia under Putin is "returning to a place of censorship, oppression and fear" — warning the shift strikes too close to home in the United States.

"People who control the social media outlets that so many Americans use to form their political views [paid] homage to Donald Trump at a White House dinner," Scott notes.

She also worries about Trump's handing TikTok "to a consortium of investors that includes companies owned by his billionaire allies" including centibillionaire Larry Ellison and his son David, who most recently became chairman and CEO of Paramount, which controls, among other things, CBS.

The kowtowing of tech execs was most recently seen Thursday, when, following pressure from the Trump administration, Apple removed the ICEBlock app and other similar applications that track Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from its App Store.

And though Scott admits that the situation in the United States is not yet as dire as Russia's, and that we "still do have a free press," she notes, she sees "how fragile our freedom is becoming."

After she moved to Russia in 1990, Scott says "the official Soviet newspaper, Pravda (or “Truth”), was still full of lies. The Russians I knew primarily purchased it to use as toilet paper, which was in short supply" — despite then-president Mikhail Gorbachev's "experiments with freedom of the press" in which "media organizations were no longer forced to publish propaganda."

But 25 years later, president Vladimir Putin "immediately targeted Russia’s newly minted media moguls," Scott writes."It was during this time that my Russian friends began speaking more guardedly and would no longer write anything critical of the regime in email or any unencrypted system."

"How frightening it has been, then, to see the freedoms we always enjoyed come under attack," she says of the current state of affairs in the U.S.

Scott also yearns for her early days in Silicon Valley, where she say she "was proud to work at companies like Apple, Google and Twitter, whose leaders eschewed an elitist, top-down, hierarchical leadership style. My early Silicon Valley bosses urged me to speak truth to power."

But her biggest fear, Scott says, isn't that an "authoritarian president and a small cadre of right-wing tech executives want to take over," but, rather, that "centibillionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk would shift the messages in their social media empires to cater to Mr. Trump."

"What is truly surprising is that everyone else — the same people who once believed in the power of technology to strengthen our society and our democracy — is allowing them to get away with it," she adds. "The same Silicon Valley leaders who used to trumpet their anti-authoritarian leadership style have gone ominously quiet."

The silence of these Silicon Valley scions, many who are "looking for a safe harbor" in Portugal and New Zealand, is what's most alarming.

"The risk is in not speaking out, because silence enables future cycles of censorship and fear ... Fear is a tyrant’s best weapon. The people in Silicon Valley who have made fortunes still have a platform and a voice. Now is the time to exercise them, and to stand together in solidarity. Our silence will not protect us," she says.

Jon Stewart viciously mocks Trump with 'administration-compliant' show after Kimmel ouster

Even though Daily Show host and executive producer Jon Stewart typically only sits at the host's desk on Monday nights, the comedian made an exception on Thursday night in the wake of ABC's abrupt decision to take late night host Jimmy Kimmel's show off the air.

The show began by introducing Stewart as the "patriotically obedient host" with Soviet-style choir singing in the background. The Daily Show host was seen at his desk wearing a crimson tie and a large American flag pin, while being surrounded by gold accents in the style of Mar-a-Lago and the Oval Office during Trump's second term.

Stewart launched into his monologue by sarcastically heaping effusive praise on Trump, telling the audience that he had a "fun, administration-compliant show" for them. He added: "If you've felt a little off the last couple of days its probably because our great father has not been home!"

Still in character, Stewart then lauded Trump's speech at a state dinner in Buckingham Palace by declaring: "The perfectly tinted Trump dazzled his hosts at dinner with a demonstration of unmatched oratory skill," before playing a clip of Trump awkwardly naming British authors like William Shakespeare, J.R.R. Tolkien and Rudyard Kipling. When the audience laughed, Stewart appeared to panic, yelling at them to "shut the f--- up!"

He concluded the segment by cutting to all of the Daily Show's seven correspondents, who were all seen standing solemnly wearing matching navy blue blazers and red ties. He asked them: "Are all the naysayers and critics right? Is Donald Trump stifling free speech?"

"Of course not Jon!" They all answered in perfect unison, holding microphones with Trump's face on them. "Americans are free to express any opinion we want! To suggest otherwise is laughable! Ha ha ha!"

Stewart's mockery of the Trump administration is particularly noteworthy, given that his show is carried by Comedy Central. Stewart's employer is owned by MTV Entertainment Group, which is owned by Paramount. The media giant has recently been in the spotlight for its $16 million settlement with Trump over his lawsuit against 60 Minutes (a production of CBS, which Paramount also owns).

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Trump's new scheme to enrich his family is endangering the entire economy

In the midst of the Trump regime’s shameful attempt to attack any and all organizations and institutions that oppose it, we must not and will not back down from holding Trump accountable for his corruption and lawlessness.

Yesterday, the New York Times — which Trump just sued for $15 billion for allegedly defaming him — reported that Steve Witkoff, Trump’s envoy to the Middle East, apparently made a multi-billion dollar deal with Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a member of the ultrarich ruling family of the United Arab Emirates who controls $1.5 trillion of the Emiratis’ sovereign wealth.

In return for Sheikh Tahnoon’s investment firm depositing $2 billion into World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency start-up founded by the Witkoffs and Trumps, the White House agreed to give the U.A.E. — in particular, a sprawling technology firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon — access to hundreds of thousands of the world’s most advanced and scarce computer chips, despite national security concerns that the chips could be shared with China.

This is just the top of the iceberg of Trump’s crypto corruption.

To understand the full extent of it, you need to go back to four days before early voting started in 2024. That’s when Trump and his sons launched the crypto firm, World Liberty Financial.

As soon as Trump won, money started pouring in.

Then, just days before returning to office, Trump launched a separate crypto scheme, selling TRUMP and MELANIA memecoins. Memecoins are a type of cryptocurrency based on an image or online joke.

Within his first six weeks in office, Trump called for a “Crypto Strategic Reserve”— a government backed stockpile of crypto assets, sort of like our oil reserve, but completely pointless. That announcement made crypto prices soar.

So far, the Trump family has made about $3 billion from crypto — with many purchases by foreign buyers. Forbes now estimates that over half of Trump’s entire net worth is crypto-based.

With Trump acting as both the President of the United States and as his own crypto brand ambassador, it’s hard to tell which job he’s doing at any given moment.

One US company said it explicitly purchased $2 million of Trump’s meme coins to influence trade policy.

The corruption goes further.

Trump’s pro-crypto SEC chair, Paul Atkins is heavily invested in crypto himself. He’s been lifting financial guardrails in ways that will make it easier for crypto firms (like the Trumps’) to spread into new markets, and going easy on crypto fraud.

Chinese billionaire Justin Sun had been charged with crypto-related fraud before Trump was elected. After Trump’s election, Sun invested more than $115 million into various Trump crypto products. What happened next? Trump’s SEC suddenly stopped prosecuting Sun.

Trump’s SEC also abandoned a lawsuit against Binance, a crypto exchange that had previously pled guilty to money laundering.

This happened just days after Binance started listing a Trump cryptocurrency on its marketplace.

The corruption goes even further.

Trump’s Justice Department even scrapped the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team, giving a green-light to all kinds of crypto crime, even though Americans lost $9.3 billion in crypto scams in 2024.

The crypto industry spent big on House and Senate races, on both Republicans and Democrats. Why? So the Senate would pass the so-called GENIUS Act — a regulatory bill that the crypto industry lobbied for. Eighteen Democrats joined with nearly all Republicans to vote yes.

The bill gives a stamp of legitimacy to so-called “stablecoins,” a type of currency that Trump’s World Liberty Financial makes and sells.

Stablecoins claim to be more stable because they’re supposedly tied to the value of other assets that are held as collateral — like the dollar or Treasury securities. But we already saw one collapse just a couple years ago, wiping out some investors’ life savings.

While the bill appropriately bans members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins, it places no such restrictions on the president.

The most dangerous part of the GENIUS Act is how it allows crypto to reach into mainstream financial systems.

All this corruption is bad enough. Worse, it could tank the economy.

The GENIUS Act opens the door to institutions investing more heavily in crypto. It would even let banks and big corporations, like Walmart, Amazon, or Facebook, launch their own digital currencies — potentially thousands of them — all with little oversight.

Trump has also opened the door to letting retirement plan administrators invest 401(k) funds in crypto. That could put your savings at risk even if you never buy any cryptocurrencies.

As we saw during the 2008 financial meltdown, the more the economy becomes entwined with volatile and speculative investments, like crypto, the greater the risk to all of us. The failure of risky bets can have a domino effect.

If a single cryptocurrency began to tank — as crypto has done in the past — investors would likely rush to sell off crypto to get their real money back. This could lead to massive bank runs.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has predicted that under the GENIUS Act, crypto firms could end up holding more than $2 trillion in U.S. treasury bills as collateral. If they had to suddenly liquidate those assets to cover a bank run, the value of U.S. securities could plummet, triggering a global financial crisis.

Crypto has shown no redeeming social value and it poses huge dangers to our economy. Yet Trump is enabling it to worm into the economy because he’s taken huge crypto payoffs that have made him and his family billions of dollars.

NOW READ: 'Lucky Loser': Trump's 'psychotic' NYT lawsuit ridiculed by legal experts

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

From Your Site Articles
@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.