Search results for "Whistleblowers"

'Highly classified whistleblower complaint' involves Trump's family: report

New details are emerging about the whistleblower complaint being withheld from most of Congress. According to a new report, the complaint allegedly involves President Donald Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner (who is Ivanka Trump's husband).

The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that the "highly classified whistleblower complaint" against Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard pertains to an intercepted communication in which Kushner's name came up during a conversation between two foreign nationals. The country the two people being monitored wasn't made clear in the Journal's report, but the two were reportedly discussing Iran.

The National Security Agency (NSA) reportedly intercepted the conversation last year, with the two subjects naming Kushner as the Trump administration's key decision-maker regarding Iran. Kushner has been helping the Trump administration with Middle Eastern policy, with the president tasking his son-in-law with drawing up a plan to rebuild the Gaza Strip in the wake of Israel's years-long military campaign against Hamas, which controls Gaza.

The whistleblower who filed the complaint has accused Gabbard of limiting the sharing of official intelligence for political ends. Gabbard reportedly met with White House chief of staff Susie Wiles last year to discuss the intercepted conversation. Following that conversation, Gabbard limited access to the intelligence itself. The DNI called the allegations "baseless and politically motivated."

In addition to the Gabbard allegations, the whistleblower also accused the NSA's general counsel of failing to report a possible crime — that was discussed during the intercepted conversation — to the Department of Justice. The whistleblower also accused the NSA's failure to report the potential crime for political reasons. Their complaint was then kept in a safe for roughly eight months.

According to the Journal, Kushner is also working closely with Trump administration special envoy Steve Witkoff, who the president put in charge of handling the Russia-Ukraine war. The two are also in charge of devising a plan to eliminate Iran's nuclear program, and the two met recently in Oman with Iranian representatives. Kushner is not an official government employee and is working with his father-in-law's administration on a volunteer basis.


Death of whistleblower tied to Trump associate raises concerns about foul play

A whistleblower is dead, and it is making heads turn to look at top tech bros.

Sam Altman, the new pal of President Donald Trump, is facing a campaign from the mother of former employee Suchir Balaji, who was found dead in his San Francisco apartment after his New York Times interview on OpenAI using copyrighted data.

RadarOnline.com reported an exclusive piece, Balaji's mother, Poornima Ramararo, suggested the evidence they have shows a different story.

She characterized her son as a "happy-go-lucky engineer."

Renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Ronald Graeser saw two major indicators that flagged the likelihood of foul play. First, there were massive levels of GHB in his system. GHB is known as the date-rape drug because it significantly incapacitates the individual. Incapacitated people don't generally shoot themselves. They're incapacitated. Still, the medical examiner brushed it off as "self-induced."

There's one main forensic inconsistency: the blood-splatter pattern is an angle consistent with a shooter standing over the victim. The family also pointed out other concerns about minor injuries that weren't included in the medical examiner's conclusions.

"I don't think it's a suicide – and that leaves deliberate homicide or murder," Graeser said.

Then there's the scene itself. The wires to his security camera were cut. There was blood in two rooms, a random wig left in the room, and Balaji ordered DoorDash before allegedly committing suicide, which seems inconsistent with those who are distraught.

Meanwhile, Altman told Tucker Carlson, "It looks like a suicide to me."

Carlson disagreed, "No, he was definitely murdered."

Altman foe Elon Musk told Joe Rogan, "All signs point to it being a murder."

According to Musk, Altman stole trade secrets from his own AI company xAI and he thinks Altman was involved in Malaji's death, the report said.

Malaji's mother agrees, saying her son was marked for death by a "team of assassins" after he blew the whistle on Altman's business.

New whistleblower alleges 'grave damage to national security' from Tulsi Gabbard

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is facing a highly classified whistleblower report, and there is concern about how to safely share it with lawmakers.

The Wall Street Journal reported Monday morning that the sensitive report is "said to be locked in a safe." President Donald Trump's administration has avoided telling lawmakers about it, claiming that it involves such secret information.

The information could cause “grave damage to national security" if it becomes public, an official claimed. The information reportedly includes "claims of executive privilege that may involve the White House."

This is an administration, however, that has claimed "national security" liberally, such as the rationale for taking over Greenland and the immigration crackdown.

“If everything can be a national emergency or a threat to national security or a matter of foreign policy, then essentially all constitutional powers are ceded to the president,” said Shirin Sinnar, a law professor at Stanford Law School in an Aug. 2025 report by Paul Blumenthal. “And that can’t be intended by the constitutional design.”

Gabbard's office claims the allegations are “baseless and politically motivated.”

However, the whistleblower's lawyer, Andrew Bakaj, said he was never aware that the inspector general's office had made any determination about the complaint's credibility. However, the inspector general's office decided that some of the allegations weren't credible while others might be.

Bakaj sent a letter to Gabbard that was also sent to the House and Senate in November, which the Journal has viewed.

"Months later, lawmakers still haven’t received the complaint itself. Some Democratic staffers on the intelligence committees have tried to learn more about the complaint in recent weeks, with little success," congressional aides told the reporters.

The month before the complaint, Republicans approved a new inspector general for the intelligence community on a 51 to 47 vote.

The new IG is Christopher Fox, who worked for Gabbard before the new job overseeing her work.

Read the full report here.

Gabbard blocked reports of Trump aide's foreign intel contact: whistleblower

A whistleblower tells the Gurdian that National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard blocked the publication of an intelligence report concerning an “unusual phone call between an individual associated with foreign intelligence and a person close to Donald Trump.”

The details of the communication are not known, but the Wall Street Journal reported it could cause “grave damage to national security" if it becomes public, according to an official. The information also "implicates another federal agency" and reportedly includes "claims of executive privilege that may involve the White House."

Last spring, the National Security Agency (NSA) intercepted the highly sensitive communication, but when the info reached Gabbard, she ducked the standard procedure of allowing NSA officials to distribute the information further and instead delivered a paper copy of the intelligence directly to the president’s chief of staff, Susie Wiles, according to attorney Andrew Bakaj.

“One day after meeting Wiles, Gabbard told the NSA not to publish the intelligence report. Instead, she instructed NSA officials to transmit the highly classified details directly to her office,” reports the Guardian. “Details of this exchange between Gabbard and the NSA were shared directly with the Guardian and have not been previously reported. Nor has Wiles receipt of the intelligence report.”

On April 17, a whistleblower contacted the office of the inspector general alleging that Gabbard had blocked highly classified intelligence from routine dispatch, according to Bakaj, who added that the whistleblower filed a formal complaint about Gabbard’s actions on May 21.

The Guardian said the intelligence report was been “kept under lock and key” for eight months, even after the whistleblower pressed to disclose details of the report to congressional intelligence committees.

“Acting inspector general Tamara A Johnson dismissed the complaint at the end of a 14-day review period, writing in a June 6 letter addressed to the whistleblower that ‘the Inspector General could not determine if the allegations appear credible,’” reports the Guardian. Johnson added also informed the whistleblower that they could only approach Congress after receiving DNI guidance on how to proceed due to the highly sensitive nature of the complaint.

After nearly a year, Gabbard’s office issued its first public acknowledgment of the complaint to lawmakers on Tuesday, the day after the Wall Street Journal broke the news of the classified brief.

“Two attorneys and two former intelligence professionals who reviewed details of the incident and ensuing complaint shared with the Guardian have identified what they believe are a series of procedural anomalies that raise questions about Gabbard’s handling of national intelligence and the whistleblower disclosure,” the Guardian reports.

Two Republican lawmakers have dismissed the report and remain loyal to Gabbard, but Democrats are raising alarms.

“The law is clear: when a whistleblower makes a complaint and wants to get it before Congress the agency has 21 days to relay it,” said Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee. “This whistleblower complaint was issued in May. We didn’t receive it until February.”

Warner said the months-long delay reflected an effort to “bury the complaint.”

Second whistleblower accuses Trump judicial nominee of telling DOJ to defy federal courts

Emil Bove — who President Donald Trump has nominated to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals — is now being accused by a second Department of Justice (DOJ) whistleblower of instructing employees to ignore the judiciary.

HuffPost's Jennifer Bendery reported Friday that an unnamed whistleblower has since confirmed a previous whistleblower account that Bove, in his capacity as principal associate deputy attorney general (the 3rd most powerful official in the agency), instructed employees to defy a federal judge's orders. Earlier this month, Erez Reuveni publicly came forward as the DOJ employee behind the first whistleblower account alleging that Bove told staffers to say "f--- you" to the courts in response to an order prohibiting the deportation of immigrants to a notorious maximum security mega-prison in El Salvador.

"Our client and Mr. Reuveni are true patriots – prioritizing their commitment to democracy over advancing their careers," Whistleblower Aid chief counsel Andrew Bakaj told HuffPost.

READ MORE: Trump DOJ sitting on 'more than 100,000 pages' of unreleased Epstein materials: NY Times

"What we’re seeing here is something I never thought would be possible on such a wide scale: federal prosecutors appointed by the Trump administration intentionally presenting dubious if not outright false evidence to a court of jurisdiction in cases that impact a person’s fundamental rights not only under our Constitution, but their natural rights as humans," he continued.

"What this means is that federal career attorneys who swore an oath to uphold the Constitution are now being pressured to abdicate that promise in favor of fealty to a single person, specifically Donald Trump,” he added. “Loyalty to one individual must never outweigh supporting and protecting the fundamental rights of those living in the United States."

Aside from the whistleblower allegations, Bove is also being accused of orchestrating a "quid pro quo" with New York City Mayor Eric Adams (D), in which the federal bribery charges against him were dropped in exchange for his cooperation with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement activities in New York. Before his role at the DOJ, Bove was one of Trump's criminal defense attorney in New York.

If confirmed to a lifelong term the Third Circuit, Bove would be one step removed from the Supreme Court, and would have jurisdiction over federal district courts in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Senate Republicans narrowly passed a procedural vote to advance Bove's nomination earlier this week.

READ MORE: 'Not just racist but stupid': VP slammed for 'sleight of hand' while promoting far-right theory

Click here to read Bendery's full report in HuffPost.

'Disqualifying': 'Trove of e-mails and text messages' bolster DOJ whistleblower’s claim

One of the many controversies the second Trump Administration is facing involves Emil Bove, a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) appointee who — former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni alleges — encouraged colleagues to defy federal court rulings on President Donald Trump's immigration policies. Bove has flatly denied Reuveni's allegations, but on Thursday morning, July 10, Politico journalists Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney reported that Reuveni "has provided Congress with a trove of e-mails and text messages to corroborate his claims" that Bove "crudely discussed defying court orders."

"The newly-released messages reinforce claims by whistleblower Erez Reuveni that Bove played a key role in a decision by Trump Administration immigration officials to turn scores of Venezuelan immigrants over to El Salvador's government despite a U.S. judge's order not to do so," Gerstein and Cheney report. "The messages show increasing alarm among Justice Department lawyers that the (Trump) Administration had in fact defied court orders and that some officials — including a prominent DOJ lawyer brought on by the Trump Administration — could face sanctions for misleading the courts."

According to Gerstein and Cheney, "The disclosures to the Senate Judiciary Committee, requested by the panel's Democrats and shared with Politico, come as the committee prepares to vote on and likely advance Bove's nomination to a seat on the Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals. Bove's brief but rocky tenure at the Justice Department appears unlikely to derail his nomination, particularly after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), a key vote on the panel, suggested Wednesday, (July 9) he was likely to back Trump's pick."

READ MORE: 'Completely reckless' Trump judicial pick may still be confirmed despite scandal: expert

Many Democrats, in light of Reuveni's allegations, are encouraging a "no" vote on Bove.

Politico's new reporting on Bove is receiving a lot of discussion on X, formerly Twitter.

Senate Judiciary Democrats tweeted, "More whistleblower evidence corroborates allegations that Emil Bove, a Trump judicial pick, said the Justice Department would need to say 'f--- you' to federal courts. Disqualifying."

College professor J. Thibodeaux said of GOP Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, "Collins and Murkowski will still vote to confirm. Watch."

READ MORE: Trump admin's new 'lie detector' campaign against leakers is unlikely to succeed: expert

CBS News' Scott MacFarlane posted, "ALERT: Whistleblower's texts suggest Trump judicial nominee Emil Bove urged lawyer to defy court order."

X user The Porcelain Dalmation tweeted, "So not only did Bove advocate disobeying court orders, he committed perjury when he lied about it in front of the committee …. Internal DOJ messages bolster claim that Trump judicial nominee spoke of defying court orders…. @politico."

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick of the American Immigration Council posted, "When questioned under oath at his confirmation hearing, Emil Bove refused to outright deny that he'd said the DOJ should tell federal judges 'f--- you,' instead avoiding any straight answer. Now newly-released text messages lend further support to the whistleblower's account."

READ MORE: That $20 dress you love now costs $30 — thanks to Donald Trump

Read Josh Gerstein and Kyle Cheney's full Politico article at this link.


'Glad he went public': National security expert praises whistleblower for taking on Trump DOJ

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee are hoping to tank the nomination of Emil Bove, an acting deputy U.S. attorney general who President Donald Trump has picked for a lifetime seat as a federal judge for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. But Bove appears to be on track for confirmation despite the troubling allegations of Erez Reuveni, a former immigration lawyer for the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) who alleges that Bove encouraged his DOJ colleagues to blatantly defy federal court orders on President Donald Trump's immigration policy. Bove flatly denies Reuveni's allegation.

In an article published by Salon on July 17, national security expert and former DOJ legal adviser Jesselyn Radack —who now heads the Whistleblower & Source Protection Program (WHISPeR) — emphasizes that whistleblowers like Reuveni play a crucial role in keeping the United States democratic and says she is "glad" he "went public."

"Reuveni's case hits home because of its parallels to my own," Radack explains. "In December 2001, as a legal adviser to the (Justice) Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, I advised the criminal division that an FBI interrogation of 'American Taliban' John Walker Lindh without his lawyer would be unethical. When I was informed three days later that he had been interrogated despite that warning, I advised that the interview might have to be sealed and used only for national security and intelligence-gathering purposes, and not for criminal prosecution."

READ MORE: 'Who in the world would be stupid enough to believe that?' Morning Joe torches Trump

Radack continues, "Three weeks later, then-Attorney General John Ashcroft announced that the Justice Department was filing a criminal complaint against Lindh — and in another three weeks, he announced an indictment, insisting that Lindh's rights 'have been carefully, scrupulously honored.' I knew that wasn’t true. I had seen photos of Lindh naked, blindfolded and bound to a board with duct tape. It was our first glimpse of torture after 9/11, and no one flinched."

The former DOJ lawyer argues that the "parallels between" her case in 2001 during George W. Bush's presidency and Reuveni's in 2025 "are uncanny."

"Like Reuveni," Radack explains, "I was pushed out of a job I loved because the Justice Department was playing fast and loose with the court in a case where a defendant appeared to have been tortured. I resigned in protest when it became clear I was going to be transferred to office Siberia or forced out. Reuveni was suspended — and then fired — because he admitted, truthfully, that a man sent to a gulag in El Salvador was deported in violation of a court order and that he did not know the legal basis for that decision."

Radack, however, doubts that Reuveni's allegations will prevent the U.S. Senate's GOP majority from making Bove a federal judge.

READ MORE: 'Didn’t you vote to pass this?' GOP rep stumps CNN host after blasting bill he voted for

"I predict Bove will also be confirmed, because if leaky, wobbly Pete Hegseth can become secretary of defense, the bar is so low that anyone can clear it," Radack writes. "I only hope that, at the end of the day, Reuveni comes out unscathed from his whistleblowing journey."

READ MORE: The Supreme Court just revealed a key to understanding Trump's Epstein catastrophe

Jesselyn Radack's full article for Salon is available at this link.

White House has insiders convinced Trump is unfit for job: whistleblower

Donald Trump’s White House even now contains staffers convinced he is unfit to be president, a former senior administration official who famously spoke out anonymously about such concerns during Trump’s first term said.

“If I was sitting with Donald Trump right now, I would say, ‘I have friends in your White House, and some of them are … laying very, very low, but share some of the same concerns that I had during the first Trump administration,’” Miles Taylor said.

Those concerns, Taylor said, were that Trump “is still the same man, but worse and emboldened, still deeply impulsive, but impulsive without checks and balances around him.”

Taylor was speaking to the Clinton adviser turned Lincoln biographer Sidney Blumenthal and the Princeton historian Sean Wilentz on their podcast, The Court of History.

Taylor was chief of staff in the Department of Homeland Security when he wrote the September 2018 op-ed for the New York Times saying he was “part of the resistance” to Trump, a group of senior officials concerned that the president was not fit to govern and dedicated to checking his wilder impulses.

The piece was published under the byline of “Anonymous,” as was a subsequent book, A Warning. The publication stoked intense speculation as to who the writer was. Taylor identified himself shortly before the 2020 election — and became a hate figure for Trump and his followers.

Returned to power, Trump recently signed an executive order suggesting Taylor may have committed treason and ordering an investigation.

This month, Taylor filed a legal complaint, calling for federal watchdogs to investigate such retaliation against him.

Trump was widely reported to have been stopped from numerous extreme actions in his first term by so-called “adults in the room” appointed to key roles, such as Defense Secretary James Mattis, a highly respected former U.S. Marine Corps general. In Trump’s second term, surrounded by loyalists such as Fox News host turned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the president is not seen to be subject to any such constraints.

Taylor told Blumenthal and Willentz: “The people around [Trump] aren't trying to talk him out of doing bad things — if anything, they are demonstrating fealty at every turn to the leader, and that's resulting in a lot of bad decisions getting made.

“Now, most of the folks I know are on, of course, the national security side of the [White] House, and some of them still think that they can keep their hand on the wheel. And I would prefer some of those people in the posts I'm thinking about than others who might replace them. But I think people of conscience in this administration know that they are an endangered species.”

As described by Wilentz, that is because Trump operates less as a traditional president than as an absolute monarch crossed with a mobster: “John Gotti meets Louis XIV.”

That remark prompted laughter, but straight faces prevailed when Taylor described the immense power enjoyed by Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff widely seen to be the most influential presidential aide, particularly in implementing ultra-hardline immigration policy.

Taylor said Miller’s power was “almost absolute,” though Miller himself “would never say that.”

“Stephen is very, very careful to always be entirely deferential to the president,” Taylor said, “but I can tell you, I remember when … I think it was 2018 … Stephen was growing frustrated, and he convinced the president, effectively, at the time to put him in charge of broader homeland security policy for the administration.

“It wasn't some public announcement, but he'd gone to the president and said, ‘Look, I'm tired of this … basically give me the authority to make some of these decisions over at DHS and essentially override the department.’

“And he called me to tell me this. I remember where I was. I was driving on Capitol Hill, and it was the words he used that stuck with me. He said, ‘Think of this as my coronation.’ That's what he called it. He called it his coronation, that he'd gotten the president to empower him to take on these new duties.”

According to Taylor, “that was, I think, the most revealing thing that I ever heard come out of [Miller’s] mouth. And Stephen, you rarely get these unguarded moments with him. He's extremely guarded. And that was sort of an unguarded moment from him, but I think illustrative of not just where his head is at, but also how this administration … thinks of governance not in terms of democracy and checks and balances, but how can you consolidate total rule?

“And so Steven certainly has that inside this administration, he's got much more authority than he had before. And you are seeing what that looks like if left unchecked, right up into these military deployments” in Los Angeles” against protests over deportations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“That's got Stephen Miller's fingerprints all over it,” Taylor said, adding that Miller had effectively relegated Kristi Noem, the Secretary of Homeland Security, to little more than a “PR role.”

Asked if it would be fair to think of Miller as effectively Trump’s “co-president,” Taylor said “that might be a bridge too far, and Steven would never promote that notion.

“You know, he knows all of his authority is derived from the president. And I think he's probably the only person, I mean this genuinely … I've ever engaged with at the White House that never showed daylight with the president. There was never a private meeting where Steven said, ‘This f------ guy has no idea what he's doing.’

“But almost everyone else I engaged with, the biggest names to the no-names, would have that conversation in private: total frustration with the president, recognition of who he really was. But Stephen, in private, wouldn't even show you that he thought the president was what everyone knows him to be.”

NOW READ: The most dangerous man in government right now isn't Trump

Ex-DOJ officials bust Trump allies claiming whistleblower is trying to subvert president

Allies of Emil Bove, President Donald Trump’s criminal defense lawyer who Trump nominated to the federal bench, are trying to discredit a whistleblower as a “disgruntled former employee,” but several character witnesses aren’t buying it.

Former Justice department attorney Erez Reuveni claims Bove proposed ignoring court orders in March while administration lawyers strategized over legal challenges to Trump’s plan to assert wartime powers to deport immigrants. Reuveni was fired from the Justice Department in April.

Reuveni disclosed a March meeting inside the Justice Department, shortly before Trump formally declared he would invoke the Alien Enemies Act to rev up deportations. At the meeting, Reuveni said, Bove "stressed to all in attendance that the planes need to take off no matter what." Bove then said that the group may need to consider telling judges "f——— you" and ignore possible court orders blocking immigrants from being removed from the U.S., according to the document.

READ MORE: Here's the real reason Republicans hate the middle class

In his own testimony, Bove describes Reuveni as a member of an “unelected bureaucracy” trying to subvert the will of the president. But Jon O. Newman, a senior judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, described Reuveni to Politico writer Ankush Khardori as “a very intelligent, conscientious, hard-working lawyer.” Reuveni clerked for Newman out of law school.

“He didn’t shy away from giving me an opinion if I asked for it, but he was not one to exaggerate his opinions or take extravagant positions,” Newman told Politico. “He was top flight” and “never over the top.”

Former Justice Department attorney David McConnell describes Reuveni as distinctly non-partisan. While working at the Justice Department for nearly 15 years Reuveni even played an integral role in defending Trump’s immigration policies in his first administration.

“He was very aggressive, very vigorous in defending the policies of the administration under all administrations,” McConnell tells Politico. “He did a lot of cases about border security, defending regulations and policy changes that the Trump administration was trying to achieve.”

READ MORE: 'That's not true and you know that': CNN host shuts down MAGA guest in front of viewers

Reuveni has won awards and commendations over nearly 15 years at the Justice Department, including from Republican appointees in the first Trump administration before being put on leave and then fired after admitting to a federal judge that the administration had deported an immigrant in error.

Politico reports former Federal Programs Branch Director Jennifer Ricketts also vouched for Reuveni’s strong work ethic.

“It remains just stunning to me that they could question how Erez comported himself here. I was honestly proud in reading his recitation — in reading how he had handled himself,” Rickets told Politico. She added that she “was deeply disappointed that others didn’t also speak up.”

Khardori reports Senate Republicans will likely approve Bove just as they have Trump’s other nominees facing “extremely serious allegations of misconduct”, but Reuveni’s former colleagues are standing behind him.

Read more: 'Break a promise': GOP senator swore at Trump in heated exchange over bill

“This was incredibly brave,” one of them told Khardori. “I feel proud of him.”

Read the full Politico report at this link.

'Stunning account': Whistleblower reveals Trump DOJ plans to defy federal court orders

The Trump Administration and President Donald Trump's critics are having intense debates over his immigration policies and the federal courts. While Trump and his allies are accusing federal courts of exceeding their authority by blocking his immigration and deportation orders, critics are responding that the federal courts are doing exactly what they are supposed to do by playing a key role in the United States' system of checks and balances.

Now, the New York Times and CNN are reporting that according to a whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, Trump appointees at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) are planning to defy federal court orders on his immigration/deportation policy. Reuveni is a former DOJ lawyer who was fired, and Reuveni spoke out in a letter to members of Congress that CNN has obtained a copy of.

In an article published on Tuesday morning, June 24, CNN journalists Annie Grayer and Katelyn Polantz report, "The letter, which was sent to members of Congress and independent investigators within the executive branch on Tuesday, is likely to prompt greater scrutiny of Emil Bove, who has been serving as the principal associate deputy attorney general. Bove faces a Senate committee hearing on his nomination to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday. The whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, who worked on the case of the mistakenly deported immigrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia, says Bove, in a March meeting, 'stated that DOJ would need to consider telling the courts f--- you' and ignore any orders to stop the hasty deportation of migrants to a prison in El Salvador."

READ MORE: 'Stable genius': Critics blast Trump’s profane tirade on White House lawn

The New York Times' Devlin Barrett reports that Bove "told subordinates he was willing to ignore court orders to fulfill the president's aggressive deportation campaign."

Reporting from the Times and CNN is generating a lot of discussion on X, formerly Twitter.

Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, a longtime Trump ally, is claiming that the Times' reporting is inaccurate.

Blanche tweeted, "The New York Times article describes falsehoods purportedly made by a disgruntled former employee and then leaked to the press in violation of ethical obligations. The claims about Department of Justice leadership and the Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General are utterly false which is likely why the author gave the Department of Justice 15 minutes this morning to respond (they wrote that we did not 'immediately respond with a comment') before releasing this garbage."

READ MORE: 'Ridiculous': Critics give Karoline Leavitt a history lesson

But other X users are having much different reactions.

Former trial attorney John Jackson, an ex-Republican, tweeted, "Stunning whistleblower account of DOJ attorneys intentionally violating court orders and lying to federal judges. We knew this was likely happening but here it is in detail."

Attorney Howard Bachman posted, "Justice Dept. Leader Suggested Violating Court Orders, Whistle-Blower Says; Emil Bove III, a Trump judicial nominee, voiced his intent to disobey court orders as others stonewalled and misled judges, according to a complaint."

Greg Nunziata, executive director of the Society for the Rule of Law, commented, "More evidence in support of an already overwhelming case: the Senate should reject Mr. Bove's nomination to the judiciary. Justice Dept. Leader Suggested Violating Court Orders, Whistle-Blower Says."

X user A. Rose wrote, "Well this is very scary. No guard rails in place. DOJ will no longer uphold the (law) or constitution. Justice Dept. Leader Suggested Violating Court Orders, Whistle-Blower Says."

READ MORE: Former Ohio senator just can’t stop trolling, gaslighting and flip-flopping

Read CNN's full article at this link and the New York Times' reporting here (subscription required).

Republican demands info about Trump official’s bribery scandal and affair with staff

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is demanding answers from Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer.

In a letter sent Wednesday, Bloomberg Law reported that Grassley wanted to know whether the stories by the conservative New York Post are accurate.

In early January an inspector general probe uncovered that shortly after Chavez-DeRemer was confirmed by the U.S. Senate, she allegedly took staff to a strip club in Oregon. She also allegedly had an extramarital affair with one of her security guards.

The senator wanted to know whether she fabricated official work so she could “travel for pleasure, while having the American taxpayer foot the bill."

Grassley is the chair of the influential Senate Judiciary Committee.

It marks just how far Grassley has backed away from the administration. It has been less than a year that Grassley, a huge supporter of whistleblower rights, refused to allow a whistleblower to speak at a confirmation hearing for one of President Donald Trump's top Justice Department officials nominated to become an appeals court judge.

"The Judiciary panel chairman has long been focused on rooting out waste of taxpayer dollars, but has consistently fended off claims of misconduct by officials more squarely in his jurisdiction, including by Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel," said Bloomberg.

The letter demands information by Feb. 11.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.