Search results for "Covid-19"

Ex-RNC chair says Trump destroying his legacy to please his worst allies

President Donald Trump appears keen to please some of the worst of his MAGA supporters as he "tramples his own legacy," a former RNC chair wrote for MS NOW, mounting a "desperate pitch" as his pool of backers gets shallower and shallower.

Michael Steele previously chaired the Republican National Committee from 2009 to 2011, and has since emerged as an outspoken conservative critic of Trump and his political agenda, including in his role as a political analyst for MS NOW. In his latest piece for the outlet on Sunday, Steele wrote that the president is now "undermining [the] biggest accomplishment" of his first term, in a bid to attract "conspiracy-minded voters."

Steele referred to Trump's recent executive order, which called for major changes to the childhood vaccination schedule, after years of right-wing conspiracy theorists falsely claiming that vaccines are dangerous, especially to children. The order specifically calls for the measles, mumps and rubella shots — commonly and safely administered as a combined injection — to be spaced out across multiple appointments.

Steele wrote that this order marked "a remarkable reversal for a president who once treated vaccine development as one of the signature achievements of his first term."

"President Donald Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic was riddled with misinformation and chaos," Steele wrote. "But amid that dysfunction, his administration launched Operation Warp Speed, the public-private partnership that accelerated the development and distribution of COVID vaccines. Trump called it a 'monumental national achievement.' Even Joe Biden, who was running against him at the time, credited the administration when he got the shot. Six years later, Trump is trashing that legacy as he courts the most conspiracy-minded factions of the coalition that put him back in office."

He added later: "While touting the order, Trump made several wildly false and dangerous claims, including the lie that vaccines are linked to autism. It’s a desperate pitch to pro-Trump parents, the Make America Healthy Again movement and conspiracy theorists, all of whom distrust childhood vaccinations. Doctors are urging Americans to ignore Trump’s vaccine order. Compliance with it would lead to reduced efficiency even if it was based in some sort of scientific reality."

Vaccines for COVID-19 were developed in a historically short amount of time across 2020, in large part thanks to the first Trump administration's "Operation Warp Speed" initiative. Supporters and enemies alike have generally agreed that it was one of, if not the single best achievement of Trump's first term. Now, however, as the MAGA right-wing becomes increasingly enmeshed with the anti-vaccine movement, Trump and his allies have become increasingly critical of vaccinations and vaccine requirements, despite the preponderance of scientific evidence, leading them to discount or outright demonize the results of Operation Warp Speed.

"There’s a real risk here," Steel later concluded. "By giving the imprimatur of the White House to these outlandish theories, Trump elevates them in the political conversation and gives them new fuel to metastasize. He turns idle chatter on the internet into official government records and undermines the serious work of historians, scientists and prosecutors. That is bad enough. But with his latest sop on vaccination to the conspiracy-minded, Trump is repudiating his own record, hurting his own supporters and putting the lives of Americans at risk."

Inside the coverup: What Trump doesn't want you to remember about 2020

Republicans went totally nutso on Dr. Anthony Fauci last week, trying to catch him with a perjury trap before the US Senate. They called him names, citied lies and pseudoscience, and attacked his integrity.

He withstood asinine statements like Josh Hawley, in an extraordinary bit of projection, saying:

“You became a narcissist and a megalomaniac and a liar! You’ve done more to harm science than anybody in my lifetime!”

Throughout it all, he retained his composure and refused to take any of their bait.

But the larger story here is what these white supremacist MAGA Republicans were trying to cover up with this deflection strategy.

Libertarian crackpot and fake science fan Rand Paul led this attack, ostensibly designed to sweep the headlines away from dead and dying Americans in Iran, the price of food and rent, and the allegations that Trump was raping children. But the real goal was even more monstrous.

What happened in 2020 can only be called an intentional, racially-based mass murder of American citizens, planned and executed by Donald Trump and Jared Kushner for purely political purposes, and virtually ignored by the American mainstream media.

And these ongoing attacks on Fauci — led by proponents (like Rand Paul) of the discredited, pseudo-science theory that “herd immunity” could have solved the crisis if we only let enough people die from Covid — are part of the effort to whitewash that history.

Here’s what really happened that they don’t want you to remember:

Throughout January and February of 2020, Covid was limited to a few clusters here in the US, all in Blue state cities that were major air hubs like Seattle and New York.

March 2020 was the month when things went to hell here. On March 5th there were 129 known cases and only 11 deaths in the US: just 33 days later, hospitals were using refrigerated trucks as morgues and over 10,000 Americans were dead of Covid.

Fear ran through communities and stalked our homes because nobody yet knew for sure how this disease was transmitted or how deadly it would become.

We were washing our groceries with bleach after picking them up at the store’s parking lot from people wearing masks, goggles, and gloves. We bought up all the air filters in the country. We worked from home when we could. We isolated ourselves from other people as much as was humanly possible.

In March and early April, serious Covid outbreaks were showing up across the Northeast and Trump — who had two years earlier shut down both of the two federal pandemic task forces Obama had put into place after the Ebola scare — charged his son-in-law, nepo-baby slumlord Jared Kushner, with responding to the crisis.

Trump put medical doctors on TV daily, the media was freaking out about refrigerated trucks carrying bodies away from New York hospitals, and doctors and nurses — along with Dr. Fauci — were our new national heroes.

By March 7th, US deaths had risen from 4 to only 22, but that was enough to spur federal action. At Fauci’s suggestion, Trump’s official emergency declaration came on March 13th, and most of the country shut down during the following week.

The skies and highways fell silent, the Dow collapsed, and millions of Americans were laid off, but saving lives was, as Dr. Fauci pointed out, the number one consideration.

Jared Kushner put together a task force of preppie 30-something white men he knew from college to coordinate getting Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) from Trump buddies and companies close to Republican members of Congress into hospitals.

They even had a plan for the Post Office to distribute 650 million masks — 5 to every American household — to slow the pandemic.

But then came April 7th, just one month later, when the New York Times ran a front-page story with the headline: Black Americans Face Alarming Rates of Coronavirus Infection in Some States.

It was followed the day later with the all-caps headline across the top of the front page: BLACK AMERICANS BEAR THE BRUNT AS DEATHS CLIMB.

It hit conservative media, Donald Trump, and Jared Kushner like a lightning bolt.

Most of the non-elderly people dying from Covid, the report found, were Black or Hispanic, not white people!

As The New York Times reported on April 7th:

“The coronavirus is infecting and killing black people in the United States at disproportionately high rates…
“In Illinois, 43 percent of people who have died from the disease and 28 percent of those who have tested positive are African-Americans, a group that makes up just 15 percent of the state’s population. African-Americans, who account for a third of positive tests in Michigan, represent 40 percent of deaths in that state even though they make up 14 percent of the population. In Louisiana, about 70 percent of the people who have died are black, though only a third of that state’s population is.”

White supremacist Republicans and rightwing media responded with a collective, “What the hell?!?”

Rush Limbaugh declared solemnly that afternoon:

“With the coronavirus, I have been waiting for the racial component.”

And here it was:

“The coronavirus now hits African Americans harder,” Limbaugh giddily intoned, “harder than illegal aliens, harder than women. It hits African Americans harder than anybody: disproportionate representation!”

It didn’t take a medical savant, of course, to figure out why, and it had nothing to do with the biology of race or Covid: it was purely systemic racism. African Americans die disproportionately from everything, from heart disease to strokes to cancer to childbirth, and are also over-represented in low-paid public-facing service jobs where they would more easily catch Covid.

It’s a symptom of a racially rigged economy and a healthcare system that only responds to money, which America has conspired to keep from African Americans for over 400 years. Of course Black people were going to die more frequently from coronavirus.

But the New York Times and the Washington Post simultaneously publishing April 7th front-page articles about that disparity — followed by it leading the news that night on ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, and Fox “News” — echoed across the rightwing media landscape like a Fourth of July fireworks display.

Tucker Carlson, the only prime-time Fox host who’d previously expressed serious concerns about the dangers of the virus, changed his tune the following day, as documented by Media Matters for America.

Now that Black people were the ones most likely to die if we forced people back to work, Tucker said on April 8th:

“[W]e can begin to consider how to improve the lives of the rest, the countless Americans who have been grievously hurt by this, by our response to this. How do we get 17 million of our most vulnerable citizens back to work? That’s our task.”

“The rest,” of course, were white people. Those “vulnerable citizens” Tucker wanted to get back to work were disproportionately minorities. As a report from the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus noted:

“Essential workers who needed to work in person, and their family members, were significantly more likely to contract the coronavirus early in the crisis. These essential workers disproportionately earned low wages and were more likely to be people of color.”

On the other hand, salaried workers — overwhelmingly white — were telecommuting. For over a year I did my show from home, for example, as did all my peers at SiriusXM, Free Speech TV, and in most media operations around the country. Everywhere that (mostly white) people could work from home, employers were making accommodations.

But Trump wanted the rest of the economy to recover from the election-year shutdown shock quickly because he knew presidents running for reelection during economic bad times almost always lose. He knew that if he wanted to win that November and stay in the White House, that meant getting “essential” workers like transit drivers, store clerks, and people in slaughterhouses back to their jobs.

Particularly if they were Black or Hispanic, as were the majority of these “essential” workers, particularly in meat packing.

(The CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, July 10, 2020, found that among 9,919 cases in 21 states with reported race and ethnicity, 87% of all Covid deaths occurred among racial and ethnic minority workers.)

Brit Hume joined Tucker’s show and, using his gravitas as Fox’s “real news guy,” intoned, in response to the report that mostly Black and Hispanic people were dying:

“The disease turned out not to be quite as dangerous as we thought.”

Left unsaid was the issue of for whom it was “not quite as dangerous,” but Limbaugh listeners and Fox “News” viewers are anything but unsophisticated when it comes to hearing dog-whistles on behalf of white supremacy.

Fully 12,677 Americans were dead by that April day, but now that Trump and the rightwing media knew that most of the non-elderly dying people were and would be Black and Hispanic, priorities were suddenly very, very different.

Now it was time to quit talking about people dying and start talking about getting those Black and Hispanic people back to work, even if it meant exposing them to a deadly disease!

On April 12th, just four days after the news that most deaths were Black and Hispanic people in Blue states, Trump retweeted a call to fire Dr. Anthony Fauci and declared, in another tweet, that he had the sole authority to open the US back up and would announce a specific plan to do that “shortly.”

On April 13th, the ultra-rightwing, nearly-entirely-white-managed US Chamber of Commerce published a policy paper titled Implementing A National Return to Work Plan.

The next day, Freedomworks, the billionaire-founded and -funded group that animated the Tea Party against Obamacare a decade earlier, published an op-ed on their website calling for an “economic recovery” program including an end to the capital gains tax and a new law to “shield” businesses from Covid-death and -injuries lawsuits.

Three days after that, the white-billionaire-funded Freedomworks and the all-white House Freedom Caucus issued a joint statement declaring that:

“[I]t’s time to re-open the economy.”

Freedomworks published their “#ReopenAmerica Rally Planning Guide” encouraging conservatives to show up “in person” at their state capitols and governor’s mansions, and, for signage, to:

“Keep it short: ‘I’m essential,’ ‘Let me work,’ ‘Let Me Feed My Family’” and to “Keep [the signs looking] homemade.”

One of the first #OpenTheCountry rallies to get widespread national attention was April 19th in nearly-all-white New Hampshire. Over the next several weeks, rallies filled with angry white people had metastasized across the nation, from Oregon to Arizona, Delaware, North Carolina, Virginia, Illinois and elsewhere.

One that drew particularly high levels of media attention — complete with swastikas, confederate flags, and assault rifles — was directed against the governor of Michigan, rising Democratic star Gretchen Whitmer and her Black Lieutenant General, Garlin Gilchrist.

This was around the time long-standing rightwing white supremacist networks began to awaken and coordinate with each other. They reached out to members of Congress and the Senate and found Republican allies. Trump explicitly encouraged them to require low-wage essential workers to return to their jobs.

Suddenly things began to change as the federal government stopped trying to save lives and started promoting policies that would eventually kill — unnecessarily — at least a half-million Americans with the disproportionately biggest death tolls among working-age Blacks and Hispanics.

NBC News, when they’d gotten hold of April emails from within the White House, ran the headline:

“Trump Administration Scrapped Plan to Send Every American a Mask in April, Email Shows.”

When Rachel Maddow reported that meat-packing plants were epicenters of mass infection, the conservative Chief Justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court pointed out that the virus flare wasn’t coming from the “regular folks” of the surrounding white community: the sick people were mostly Hispanic and Black.

He essentially said, “No big deal.”

The Republican meme was now well-established and was being repeated virtually daily on Fox “News” and rightwing talk radio: Working-age white people were far, far less likely to get less sick, more likely to be asymptomatic, or — even if they were unlucky and got sick — most likely to survive a trip to the hospital.

And meat packing plants essential to white Americans’ food supply were places with few white people (and the few whites in them were largely poor and thus disposable).

Trump’s response was to issue an executive order using the Defense Production Act (which he had refused to use to order production of testing or PPE equipment) to order the largely Hispanic and Black workforce back into the slaughterhouses and meat processing plants.

African Americans were dying in our cities, Hispanics were dying in meat packing plants, the elderly of all races were dying in nursing homes.

But the death toll among working age affluent white people (who could telecommute and/or were less likely to be obese, have hypertension, or struggle with diabetes) was still relatively low.

It took a lot of pressure off Trump and his Republicans. They could now politicize the virus, and, if they did it right, they could do so publicly with a “wink” to their white supremacist base while blaming it all on Democratic Blue state governors.

And if they could get the economy back to cranking along within the next few months, Trump might be able to pull the 2020 election out of the bag.

As an “expert” member of Jared Kushner’s team of young, unqualified white men supervising the administration’s PPE response noted to Vanity Fair’s Katherine Eban:

“The political folks believed that because it was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy.”

That’s right: “An effective political strategy.”

It was, after all, exclusively Blue States that were then hit hard by the virus: Washington, New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut. Red states, not being coastal travel hubs and generally lightly populated, seemed to have been spared.

And there was an election coming in just a few months, so Trump began explicitly scapegoating Blue state governors for the high death rates.

Just four weeks after Trump changed his policy to force “essential workers” back into their jobs, he went on Fox to argue that Blue states should not get federal assistance because they were mismanaging Covid. As NBC News reported, Trump said:

“It’s not fair to the Republicans, because all the states that need help, they’re run by Democrats in every case. Florida is doing phenomenal. Texas is doing phenomenal. The Midwest is, you know, fantastic…”

He kept at it, for months, leading up to the election in November.

As ABC News reported on September 17, 2020, Trump gleefully pushed Kushner‘s “effective political strategy,” pointing out the low Covid death rates in Red states, adding:

“So we’re down in this [Red state] territory. And that’s despite the fact that the blue states had had tremendous death rates. If you take the blue states out, we’re at a level that I don’t think anybody in the world would be at. We’re really at a very low level. But some of the states, they were blue states and blue state-managed.”

ABC News closed that article with a paragraph noting:

“[Y]esterday was the furthest the president has gone in politicizing the pandemic which has claimed the lives of nearly 200,000 Americans.”

As a result of Trump’s and Kushner‘s “effective political strategy” of forcing Black and Hispanic people to bear the brunt of the deaths while blaming them on Democrats, by year’s end the United States was ranked 5th worst in the world in our response (behind Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, and Iran); we had about 20% of the world’s Covid deaths, but only 4.5% of the world’s population.

As the National Institute of Health’s National Library of Medicine noted in December 2020:

“Approximately 97.9 out of every 100,000 African Americans have died from COVID-19, a mortality rate that is a third higher than that for Latinos (64.7 per 100,000), and more than double than that for whites (46.6 per 100,000)...”

The lasting legacy of Trump’s April 8th change in policy and his encouraging Covid skepticism to get Black and Hispanic people back to work is that today we’re the world’s worst in terms of death and sickness, period.

He’d thrown his unqualified slumlord son-in-law Jared Kushner at something even a professional would’ve found the challenge of a lifetime. And then manipulated it to intentionally expose Black and Hispanic people to a deadly disease while helping him in the upcoming 2020 election by going back to work.

More people have died of Covid in America, as a percentage or in absolute terms, than any other developed country in the world.

Why? Because Trump and his Republican enablers and co-conspirators were just fine with getting the economy back on track to win an election over the bodies of dead Black and Hispanic workers and their families, particularly when they could blame it on Democratic Blue-state governors.

Former Attorney General Kennedy’s grandson Max Kennedy Jr, 26, was one of the administration’s volunteers, who blew the whistle to Congress on Kushner and Trump. As Jane Mayer wrote for The New Yorker:

“Kennedy was disgusted to see that the political appointees who supervised him were hailing Trump as ‘a marketing genius,’ because, Kennedy said they’d told him, ‘he personally came up with the strategy of blaming the [Blue] states.’”

As that report released from the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus noted in 2022:

“In the first half of 2020, African Americans and Latinos had death rates from coronavirus that far outweighed those of whites. While 62% of the population age 45-54 in 2020 was white, this population accounted for only 22% of coronavirus deaths in that age range. …
“Disparities were even more pronounced in some states such as Louisiana, where in April 2020, African Americans represented 70% of coronavirus deaths despite being only one third of the state’s population.”

And once Trump and Kushner put that death-based reelection strategy into place in April, it became politically impossible to back away from it, even as more and more Red state white people started to become infected.

As Trump told Dr. Deborah Birx in mid-April and she reported in her book Silent Invasion: The Untold Story:

“‘We will never shut down the country again. Never.’ His pupils hardened into points of anger… I felt the blood drain from my face, and I shivered slightly.”

Trump’s change — from Fauci’s policy of prevention to a policy of Rand Paul’s beloved “herd immunity” once he realized on April 7, 2020 that healthy white people were largely immune from death by the coronavirus — put the US on-course to have the worst Covid death rate in the world.

That was the day everything changed because Trump and Kushner were willing to let Black and Hispanic people die on a gamble they could still put the economy back together fast enough to win the 2020 election.

Over a million Americans have died so far, more than any other nation. Multiple studies show that up to 500,000 of those deaths wouldn’t have happened if Trump had just promoted masks and lock-downs through the year before the vaccine was available and, since then, if he had condemned the anti-vax movement that emerged in the last months of his presidency.

But he didn’t do either. All because he knew the virus disproportionately killed Black and Hispanic people and he was willing to let human beings die just to win the election.

And sure enough, as Congress reported in December 2022, a massive number of those deaths were — as a clear result of Trump’s policy ­— among Black and Hispanic people.

If that’s not race-based mass slaughter, aka genocide at a Serbian war crimes level, then the phrase has lost much of its meaning.

Now you know the rest of the story, and what’s motivating Republicans like Paul and Hawley to behave so reprehensibly, hoping to cover up their and Trump’s racially-based mass slaughter of Americans.

Trump is staring down a familiar nightmare due to a household staple

President Donald Trump's latest economic moves have him staring down a potential disaster eerily similar to one that haunted his first term, according to a new piece from MS NOW, and it all comes down to one common household staple.

In a piece published Sunday morning, reporter and author Anne Kim examined the recent reports that Trump's reignited trade war with Canada is threatening to disrupt America's supply of toilet paper, calling to mind the rampant shortages of the same product that plagued the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic in the last year of his first term. This time, it is his tariffs on Canada set to make the costs for consumers skyrocket, given that America's northern neighbor is its largest supplier of the vital paper good.

"Remember the Great Toilet Paper Panic of 2020? In the first few months of the COVID-19 pandemic, massive supply chain disruptions led to shortages of many basic goods, including — crucially — toilet paper," Kim explained. "People bartered face masks and hand sanitizer in exchange for precious rolls. Criminals attempted daring toilet paper heists. Bidet sales soared."

She added: "More than six years later, Americans are freaking out over a potential surge in toilet paper prices after President Donald Trump’s trade war with Canada. Canada is the United States’ largest supplier of toilet paper imports, which are now subject to a 50 percent tariff thanks to Trump. (Facial tissues, paper towels and napkins are tariffed, too.) Call it another stain on Trump’s handling of the economy."

Kim noted that the reality of the situation is a little less sensational and foreboding than the reports might suggest, as Canada's contributions to the U.S. toilet paper supply are not as large as one might expect, providing only 5 percent of the product used in the country in 2024. The Canadian wood pulp supply used by American companies to produce toilet paper has also been exempted from tariffs.

Instead, Kim argued that the "virality" of the story suggests that the situation is more like "a symbol of consumer confidence" amid Trump's turbulent economy. The resonance with the 2020 shortages might also lead many anxious consumers to recall some of the worst moments of Trump's past economic performance.

"The Trump administration makes a mistake if it underestimates Americans’ worries over this lowly consumer staple," she argued, adding later that, "By rekindling his trade war with Canada, Trump hasn’t just flushed away the last vestiges of goodwill with our closest ally. He’s wiped away any pretense of concern about Americans’ daily struggles with affordability."

Bank of America warns Trump’s Fed Chair is losing credibility

President Donald Trump's new Federal Reserve chairman is already losing credibility, and he's only been on the job for a few months.

Kevin Warsh announced last week that the Fed would not raise or lower interest rates, and now it appears at least one of the big banks is questioning his leadership.

Bloomberg's Joe Weisenthal reported that Bank of America thinks that Warsh seems too relaxed about inflation, and it's making investors nervous. Markets, it said, now expect more inflation risk and more uncertainty.

"Fed Chair Warsh's press conference on the back of a 9-3 decision to hold the policy rate unchanged came across as dovish, and didn't bring any good or bad news, and it just added uncertainty. The market immediately priced it with a bear steepening, high inflation breakevens, and higher risk premia. A steeper curve, lower equities and a weaker dollar is the typical price action associated with credibility shocks faced by EM central banks," the message said.

Employ America executive director Skanda Amarnath said that Warsh was hyping rate hikes for July and then backed out. "And now the committee will compensate with more hikes in 2026. Three hikes is the right base case for the rest of the year."

Warsh's credibility was also questioned by Tim Duy, chief U.S. economist for SGH Macro Advisors

Economics and public policy professor Justin Wolfers explained on his podcast, "Markets don't just listen to the Fed's actions. They listen to what the Fed says it believes. When that message gets unclear, uncertainty fills the gap.⁣"

Warsh's problem, Wolfers said, is that he appeared to believe saying less would be better. However, "Less clarity created more uncertainty.⁣ ⁣Markets don't just listen to the Fed's actions. They listen to what the Fed says it believes. When that message gets unclear, uncertainty fills the gap."

Meanwhile, Weisenthal also flagged from the Institute for Supply Management, "Two separate respondents in the ISM manufacturing report [say] that the current market environment is worse than COVID-19."

"No normalcy in sight in the world of metals," said the person for Primary Metals. "It makes me yearn for the coronavirus pandemic chaos, which was more manageable than whatever this is that we are in. At least business is better; however, the components of good business are not. Sharp pricing downturns in aluminum will make things more interesting, as supply levels will prevent those decreases from taking hold across the board. Getting customers to understand that is not always easy."

A rep from Electrical Equipment, Appliances and Components, agreed. "The pricing volatility and lead-time extensions in this market are arguably worse than the pandemic era. During COVID-19, we saw a surge of price hikes and inventory buy-ups, which caused constraints that eventually leveled out. We are seeing nothing but consistent upward trends for both pricing and lead times that show no signs of slowing down."


Republican effort to go after Trump foe thwarted by bungled paperwork

President Donald Trump and his allies have spent the past two years on a crusade to attack their perceived foes, using the power of the Justice Department and of Congress itself.

Such was the case with former National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, who was called before the Senate to answer questions from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and other lawmakers.

Paul, along with colleagues Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have all indicated at one time or another that they believe Fauci should be investigated or criminally charged for his role in the COVID-19 crisis, though there have never been specific laws they cited he broke.

Fauci appeared before Paul again this month. The senator demanded Fauci's answers to questions in what some believed was a perjury trap. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination to every question asked.

Republicans then came up with the idea that, despite showing up and answering every question asked by taking the Fifth, Fauci should be charged with contempt of Congress.

According to the Wall Street Journal, however, there hasn't been much progress on the matter because Paul's office, along with Vice President JD Vance, appears to have bungled the paperwork.

It has been three weeks since the vote and Trump administration officials doubt anything will really come of Paul's efforts. There's some skepticism about whether the Justice Department could make a case solid enough to take away someone's Fifth Amendment rights, those familiar told the site.

First, Paul bypassed the Senate's full-floor vote by sending it to the vice president for certification of the resolution, which allows Vance to refer it to the DOJ for prosecution.

"The contempt resolution, which passed on a party-line vote, would traditionally be considered by the full Senate," the report said. In this case, however, only the committee voted. "Given his resolution would almost certainly fail to meet a 60-vote threshold [to break a filibuster and] to pass, Paul’s measure called on Vance to certify it in his capacity as Senate president," according to the report.

Since then, people familiar with the matter told the Journal that Vance's office never got a document to certify. Paul sent the report to the vice president last Tuesday, his office said.

"The Justice Department, which received a letter from Paul the day of the vote laying out the committee’s case against Fauci, has yet to receive a formal referral," a person familiar with the case told the Journal.

President Donald Trump hasn't decided whether he wants the Justice Department to act on the referral, those familiar with the discussions told the reporters. They said that it "hasn't been a high priority for the president."

MAGA’s latest vendetta can't erase Trump’s massive failures: analysis

During most of Donald Trump's second presidency, Dr. Anthony Fauci's name appeared in few headlines. But on Thursday, August 6, the GOP-controlled Senate Homeland Security Committee voted to recommend a contempt of Congress charge for the former Biden administration health official after he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during a recent hearing. And according to scathing analysis from Salon's Amanda Marcotte, the MAGA movement's vendetta against Fauci defies all logic and reason.

Over the years, Fauci, now 85, had very good relations with pre-Donald Trump GOP presidents — from Ronald Reagan to George W. Bush. Yet many MAGA Republicans resent Fauci deeply for supporting restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, which killed more than 1 million Americans.

"For people outside of Donald Trump's MAGA coalition," Marcotte argues in her August 10 article, "the renewed Republican harassment campaign of Dr. Anthony Fauci makes no sense. It's been more than five years since the COVID-19 lockdowns ended. With the November midterms looming, most Americans are far more focused on present-day concerns, such as the high cost of living and a tough job market, than a disease that has faded from a 'mortal threat' to a 'minor annoyance' for the vast majority of people. But that didn't stop Senate Republicans, led by Kentucky's Rand Paul, to haul the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases before a Senate committee in late July to be harangued with coronavirus conspiracy theories — even though Fauci's tenure ended four years ago."

Marcotte emphasizes that although "most voters" in the United States "don't even want to think about the pandemic anymore," the "social media response to the Fauci hearing showed that one group of people wishes it could be 2020 all over again: MAGA diehards."

"For normal people, yearning for a time when we were socially isolated and afraid of dying from a highly contagious virus is downright bizarre," Marcotte explains. "MAGA, though, has a reason to feel nostalgia for a pandemic that killed millions. It was an era when the GOP got to do what they love more than anything: play the victim as loudly as possible before huge audiences that were especially vulnerable to disinformation. The pandemic was a painful, scary time that many of us have tried to block out."

The Salon journalist continues, "But at the height of the pandemic, the right found both unity and energy by denying the seriousness of a virus that was, at its height, killing thousands of people a day…. This was the era of angry white people going into grocery stores unmasked, so they could film themselves throwing tantrums when the underpaid, scared clerks asked them to follow the rules. It was a moment when evangelical preachers, always hungry for proof that Christians are facing persecution, claimed it was a violation of religious freedom when they were asked to obey the same bans and restrictions on large indoor gatherings as everyone else. When a vaccine was finally released that offered protection against the deadliest version of the disease, MAGA was unwilling to give up a pandemic that was clearly serving their political purposes."

But MAGA's vendetta against Fauci, Marcotte argues, won't erase Trump's weak approval ratings in poll after poll.

"Between the Iran war and a faltering economy," Marcotte writes, "Trump's presidency is failing, and his approval ratings are in the toilet…. By reviving the harassment campaign against Fauci, the GOP has inadvertently revealed the time they long to return to: an era that is remembered by most people as miserable and deadly."

'Can’t prove that': Critics howl as Fox News shuts down a Tuberville lie

Fox Business is not universally known for holding Republican or MAGA sources accountable for falsehoods when they’re in front of cameras. That’s why a quick correction of bloviation from Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) was such a shock.

On Wednesday, armed with thousands of pages of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s private pandemic diaries, Senate Republicans had planned to grill Fauci over alleged inconsistencies as the science of the COVID-19 pandemic continued to evolve over the pandemic’s history.

But Fauci, the longtime director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, pleaded the Fifth and refused to answer questions as he squared off square off with committee Chairman Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and the hearing devolved into a letdown for Paul and Republicans.

Paul indicated during the hearing Wednesday that he plans to hold a committee vote next week to declare Fauci in contempt of Congress. And other Republicans ranted their frustration before reporters later that day.

“He put this country in a tailspin,” Tuberville told Fox Business. “He almost bankrupted our country worth what they did. Between Obama and Biden this guy get’s ‘Weasel of the Year’ award.”

Tuberville went on to vow Fauci would “eventually end up broke or in prison [because] I’m eventually gonna be governor of Alabama … and we’re gonna sue the heck out of this guy.”

“He’s going to court everyday of his life for the rest of his life … because the pardon doesn’t cover state government. And we’re gonna go after him with everything we got because the guy killed or had something to do with the killing of 9 million people.”

“Yeah, we can’t prove that,” the Fox Business anchor immediately countered. “That’s yet to be determined how many people are due to that.”

“Oh, yeah. We can determine it,” Tuberville insisted. “… He was the guy that funded this.”

You said you can determine it. We understand that. We understand that you want to move to do that,” the host corrected.

“Just another day on Capitol Hill,” said reporter Jamie Dupree on X.

Another critic raged: “9 MILLION?! The official Covid-19 death toll stands at ~1,123,000.”

“This is such an utterly insane thing to say,” said another. “This has gotten way out of hand. Trump should honestly speak up for Fauci at this point if he has any goodness in him whatsoever.”

Other hecklers pointed out that the Fox anchor’s instant fact check only happened because the network has lost very expensive lawsuits for past lies.

“Thank God Fox News has lost a few very expensive lawsuits recently, otherwise you know damn well her response would be more along the lines of "and some say it's even double that,” said the critic on X.

MAGA darling berates 'crackpot ghouls' ruining the movement

Conservative columnist and podcaster Josh Hammer has expressed sharp criticism regarding the internal direction of the populist conservative movement following the death of former Turning Point USA leader Charlie Kirk.

In an interview with the Daily Mail, Hammer stated that the movement is experiencing a tumultuous shift, with fringe figures and conspiracy theories threatening to tear down its foundation.

"Since Kirk's death, the madness has only ratcheted up," Hammer told the Daily Mail. "Crackpot, revisionist historians now appear regularly on the world's largest podcasts, conservatives-in-name-only traffic in ancient hatreds and sincere commentators are increasingly drowned out." He added that there has been "a breakdown in the ability of many on the Right to distinguish between fact and fiction, truth and lie, right and wrong."

Hammer argued that the rise of these fringe theories stems from a loss of public trust caused by institutional actions. He cited several events, including the Russia investigation, the institutional response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story, and the legal prosecutions of Donald Trump. According to Hammer, these events led many people to conclude that they cannot trust mainstream information, creating a vacuum for opportunistic commentators.

"Into this vacuum have crawled opportunistic ghouls who are willing to sacrifice credibility for clicks," Hammer said. "But there is nothing good down that rabbit hole, only suffering and immiseration, the very toxic mentality that Kirk fought against so passionately."

Following Kirk's death, podcaster Candace Owens launched a public campaign against Hammer, who is Jewish, accusing him of being complicit in Kirk's murder. Hammer described Owens' claims as "vile and utterly baseless smears," noting that the common denominator among those targeted by such rhetoric is often their Jewish faith or public support for Israel.

Hammer also criticized political leaders for failing to address these elements within the movement. He highlighted Vice President JD Vance's response to questions about his ongoing relationship with commentator Tucker Carlson, whom Hammer considers a primary source of online conspiracy theories.

When asked about Carlson, Vance stated, "Tucker is a friend, despite the fact that we disagree on a number of things. I'm not going to play the game where I throw friends under the bus because I have political disagreements with them."

Hammer rejected that characterization, countering that the issue goes far beyond standard policy debates. "If this were a matter of political disagreement, I may agree," Hammer said. "But it is not. If Carlson were just some friend of the Vice President's, I may let it pass. But he isn't."

Hammer concluded by stating that the conservative movement must regain its footing. "America's conservatives cannot abandon the work of discerning right from wrong," Hammer said.

Reporter explains 'colossally dumb' reason Trump is uniquely 'terrible'

President Donald Trump has managed a uniquely "terrible" feat, one veteran D.C. reporter explained, with his "colossally dumb" decisions making him directly responsible for things in ways unlike almost any other president.

Asawin Suebsaeng is a senior political correspondent for Zeteo who also previously covered national politics and the Trump administration for Rolling Stone and The Daily Beast. In a thread posted to BlueSky on Monday, he was unsparing in his assessment of the president's economic record, stressing that he was directly responsible for rising costs, an issue most past presidents have been blamed for despite having little actual impact on.

"I need younger generations to understand how weird it is that Trump is such a unique terrible f—— up that it’s actually correct to blame the president for a demonstrably s—— economy and costs," Suebsaeng began. "The job of president is largely: you get to take credit for things that weren’t really your doing, but that means [you] will get blamed for the 'happened on your watch' stuff even [though] presidents don’t generally have that much control over the economy."

He continued: "It is insanely funny that Trump is so colossally dumb that he found ways that maybe no one else would have to make it absolutely right and factual for you to blame him. Under almost any other year of your life, yelling about a plane ticket costing much more than it should and then blaming the president would hopefully get [you] yelled at, like [you] were that guy in Forrest Gump blaming [former President Lyndon] Johnson for him being an a——. You can absolutely [though] correctly yell at this president for your plane ticket. Your gas prices. Your homeowner insurance being much much more expensive. And so many other things big and small, that are *directly* tied to *his* unilateral moves. It’s astounding."

Experts have long noted that many of the economic trends that voters reward or punish presidents for are largely beyond their control, with many reiterating the point while Trump claimed that he would be able to rein in prices during his 2024 reelection campaign. Now, however, Trump's tariffs, trade wars and war with Iran have contributed directly to inflation in unprecedented ways.

Responding to Suebsaeng's posts, former White House economist Aaron Sojourner shared his own take on Trump's economic malpractice from last year, in which he lambasted Trump for driving the economy into a "ditch" after Joe Biden managed a largely successful soft landing from the impacts of COVID-19.

"Our economy was 'the envy of the world.' We had stuck the soft landing," Sojourner wrote. "All he had to do was run his first term playbook. Sit back and claim credit for the economic trends he inherited. But nope. Swerved us towards the ditch."

Tuning out Trump is the most destructive thing you can do now

Yesterday, the Republican-led Senate confirmed acting Attorney General Todd Blanche to be the next U.S. attorney general.

Like Richard Nixon’s attorney general, John Mitchell, Blanche has carried out the illegal orders of a president of the United States. As was Mitchell’s fate, Blanche should be behind bars. Mitchell served 19 months of a two-and-a-half year sentence for conspiracy and obstruction of justice in the Watergate scandal.

Instead, Senate Republicans have given Blanche a promotion.

On Thursday, a Republican-led Senate panel voted to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress for his refusal to answer questions at a hearing last week. At that hearing, Fauci sat stoically for three hours, invoking his constitutional right not to answer questions about his leadership during the pandemic because of his justifiable fear that Senate Republicans would try to find something he might say to charge him with perjury. As it stands now, Senate Republicans may ask the Justice Department to prosecute him for failure to comply with their subpoena.

Fauci is an American hero. He gave invaluable advice to seven presidents — from Reagan to Biden — through anthrax attacks, Ebola outbreaks, SARS scares, and the COVID-19 pandemic. He devised the U.S. global attack plan against AIDS. George W. Bush gave him the Presidential Medal of Freedom for his work on HIV and AIDS.

Senate Republicans promote Blanche and s--- on Fauci? What the hell is going on?

Look, I’m the first to admit that too many Democrats in Congress are lily-livered, unwilling to fight as hard as they should against Trump’s neofascism.

But congressional Republicans are worse than profiles in cowardice. They’ve nearly become a criminal enterprise, actively colluding with the neofascist in the Oval Office.

They’ve confirmed Blanche even without any guarantees that Trump won’t use the $8 billion slush fund Blanche created for him to reward the Capitol attackers, or that Trump won’t use the IRS immunity Blanche also got for him to prevent the public from ever knowing the full extent of Trump’s criminal enterprises.

And what’s with the Republican obsession over Anthony Fauci? The guy is 85 years old and retired. Why bother? It can’t be about defending Trump or avenging any damage to him. COVID was six years ago. People don’t blame Trump for it. They probably should, but if they really did, he wouldn’t have had a chance in 2024.

It can’t be because Fauci’s role in the pandemic is a burning political issue, because polls show exactly zero percent of Americans care about going after Fauci.

Sure, Rand Paul has a personal grudge against him, but Paul is crazier than a s----house rat. So why are so many Republicans and even some Republican state attorneys general joining in his crusade against Fauci?

The reason is simple. Republicans have nothing else to talk about in the upcoming midterm elections. Trump’s foreign policy and Iran war are disasters. His economy is a catastrophe. His immigration dragnet, a cruel calamity. His health policy, an embarrassment or worse. His environmental policies, a gift to Big Oil.

Congressional Republicans have gone along with all of it. They’ve also enacted Trump’s giant tax reductions for the wealthy and big corporations that are funded in part by cuts in Medicare, Medicaid, and food stamps.

Trump himself is bonkers and losing it by the day. His communist witch hunt is a bad joke. His polls continue to plummet to record lows. Ballroom? Reflecting pool? Crypto deals? All have become Republican nightmares.

So Republicans are desperate for something, anything, anyone — a fall guy, a scapegoat — to rant against, whip up the Republican base against, and raise money for their fall campaigns. Fauci is old, can’t defend himself, is easily demagogued.

Yes, my friends, it’s all upside down. Frightening and nuts. But may I remind you that there are just 86 days until the midterms, when we can throw many of these criminal Republicans out of office?

Which gets me to you. A few days ago I asked many of you how you’re coping with this ongoing horror.

In response, some of you said you’re tuning it out, or you’ve concluded that nothing can be done about it so why bother.

I get it. I sometimes can’t stand to hear another word about the loathsome Trump and his insufferable sycophants. And occasionally I despair that he and his regime will continue their reign of destruction regardless of what I or anyone else does.

But the vast majority of you told me you’re coping in two other ways: by choosing to be grateful for what’s good about America and by becoming more activist.

You’re focusing on the generosity you see around you every day, the simple acts of kindness, and the courage and dedication of people such as our teachers, nurses, social workers, and community leaders.

You’re protecting the vulnerable in your community, supporting good candidates, sending postcards to potential voters, protesting against Trump and his outrages, and boycotting companies that are enabling him.

As one member of our Substack community, Johan, commented a few weeks ago, it’s perfectly normal for people to wait to take action until they feel hopeful.

Yet in reality, hope emerges from action. It’s what activism pays back.

Which is also why hopelessness is a trap. “We’re all f---- may feel like clear-headed realism, but it’s just surrender — draped in the costume of being realistic.

The billionaire class and their Republican lackeys want us to fall into hopelessness so they can have it all without any resistance. Hopelessness costs them nothing, yet it costs us everything. It’s the cheapest possible win for them, yet some of us hand it over for free.

Gratitude is the most powerful and enduring sentiment of all — not because everything’s fine. Obviously it’s not. We’re in deep s---. Gratitude is powerful and enduring because when you feel gratitude, you pay attention to what’s still worth defending. This fortifies hope and adds urgency to activism. Or, as Johan reminds us, you keep your head by keeping your hands on something real.

I don’t want to be preachy or didactic. I just want to reassure you that despite the loathsomeness of those now in control of our government — despite the Republicans in Congress who have confirmed Blanche and voted to hold Fauci in contempt, and despite the malignant, sadistic narcissist they suck up to — we can be grateful for the kindness, generosity, and freedom we experience every day.

It is worth defending. It gives hope for a better future. It adds urgency to our activism. It fortifies our commitment to rid ourselves of the criminals and quislings now in control of our government, and to do what we can to replace them with good, honest, and capable people.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/.

New study exposes glaring hypocrisies in how Trump voters obey him

A large number of President Donald Trump’s supporters began wearing masks in mid-2020 after their leader urged them to do so — and now, a scientific paper explains the psychology behind why they did so, per PsyPost.

“Political leaders play a potentially important role shaping behaviors and beliefs during crises. In the pandemic, a number of high-status politicians, notably leaders of populist parties, were seen to diminish compliance with institutional recommendations by casting doubt on COVID guidelines,” proclaimed the abstract of a recent study by Bartholomew A. Konechni, a sociologist at Sciences Po Paris, published in the journal American Sociological Review. “But what happens when such leaders change position and endorse previously discouraged behaviors?”

Konechni analyzed data of more than 5,000 patients from the Understanding Coronavirus in America panel to study how millions of Trump’s supporters switched from refusing to wear masks during the COVID-19 pandemic to embracing them, entirely because of Trump saying on July 1, 2020, that he started wearing them because he thought doing so made him look like the Lone Ranger. He learned that when Trump made his announcement that he would wear masks, it closed the gap between Republican and Democratic compliance by roughly 40 percent, particularly among individuals who were more exposed to the early-summer spikes in COVID-19. Yet this did not mean that they necessarily abandoned their original anti-mask views.

“In contrast to expectations from most dominant theoretical models of behavioral change, especially the health belief model, no corresponding shift in beliefs about facemasks can be detected,” Konechni wrote. “These results have important theoretical implications for understanding how pivots can shape behaviors during crises, the validity of existing models in public health, pandemic populism’s causes, and directions of future research.”

PsyPost’s Karina Petrova elaborated on what exactly happened.

“Such a disconnect might seem unusual, but sociologists have documented similar patterns in everyday life,” Petrova wrote. “College students often drink heavily in public to fit in with peers, even if they privately disapprove of binge drinking. Parents sometimes refuse childhood vaccinations based on suspicion, but they will accept a vaccine for themselves under intense workplace pressure. Social expectations frequently push people into actions they do not intellectually endorse.”

Konechni found that Trump’s “Lone Ranger” comment worked because many of Trump’s supporters were “living in states where the outbreak was spiking the hardest. This suggests that the severity of the crisis acted as a catalyst. When people are navigating immediate danger, they may look to their preferred leaders for survival cues. They might follow those cues for group solidarity or out of plain anxiety, bypassing the need to logically validate the underlying science.”

Petrova added, “There are limitations to this analysis that warrant attention. The study used self-reported data. Survey participants might have altered their answers simply to project loyalty to their political camp instead of accurately reporting their habits. The focus on a single political figure during a rare global disaster also restricts how broadly these lessons can be applied.”

Yet the science journalist continued, “Face masks were highly visible and novel, which might separate them from more private medical choices like taking a pill. Trump also commands a decidedly unique relationship with his base. The results from this specific historical moment may not translate seamlessly to a standard politician asking their constituents to eat less sugar or exercise more frequently. Future studies might explore how strong social networks shape these reactions, or how long such unanchored behaviors can be realistically maintained.”

Speaking with this journalist for Salon in 2021, Dr. Nicholas Epley, a professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago, said that “when we’re engaging [in] motivated reasoning, we tend to hold evidence to a lower threshold of quality before we believe it’s true. A person trying to justify a belief they have might ask themselves ‘can I’ believe this to be true, while a person trying to refute a belief they’d rather not have holds evidence to a higher standard, asking themselves ‘must I’ believe this to be true. Both are motivated approaches to evaluating evidence. The first can lead us to accept weak evidence in support of a belief, while the latter can lead us to be overly skeptical of good evidence.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.