Search results for "Biden state of the union"

Why Trump’s State of the Union could give MAGA a 'false sense of security'

President Donald Trump's 2026 State of the Union (SOTU) address is set for this Tuesday night, February 24. Because Trump frequently expresses his opinions via his Truth Social platform, some political voices aren't expecting to hear anything new from him. But Slate's Jim Newell, in an article published the day of the speech, lays out some reasons why a SOTU can have a major impact — and in some cases, a negative one.

To illustrate his point, Newell looks back on two past SOTU addresses: Trump's in 2017 and former President Joe Biden's in 2024.

"Why does this snookering keep happening?" Newell asks. "The State of the Union is a moment when the president can project the exact aura he wants on a grand stage. For Biden, that was vigor. For Trump's first, that was gravitas. They get not only that moment, but an artificial news peg — a chance to reassess whatever narrative is setting in that they don't like. And people keep falling for it by acting as if these speeches are reflections of reality. You're better off trusting the version of the politician you see outside the heavily staged infomercial in the House of Representatives."

After Biden's SOTU in February 2024, many of his allies were convinced that he could go the distance with his reelection campaign and win a second term. But Biden's widely criticized performance during a debate with Trump later that year doomed his campaign, and he ended up dropping out of the race.

"The stakes were unusually high for President Joe Biden in his 2024 State of the Union address," Newell recalls. "Most Americans thought he was too old to run for a second term, but Biden was dead set on doing so….. Biden's team got the headlines they wanted, with his hour-plus speech being described as 'feisty,' 'fiery,' 'energetic' and 'impassioned,' 'rowdy and shouty.' It was all of those things…. Biden hadn't become a younger man overnight, but he gave enough of a performance of energy to temporarily contain Democratic murmurs about his standing for reelection."

Trump's 2017 SOTU, Newell notes, was viewed as his chance to present himself as a more traditional Republican and a "statesman."

"Only old souls will remember," Newell explains, "but there was a moment early in his first presidency when it was an open question as to whether the enormity of the job would humble Trump into becoming something different: that he'd talk less trash, that he’d project gravitas. That he’d become something, in other words, resembling a statesman. That, at least, was an image his speechwriters sought to project in his first joint address in 2017…. Not many days after the speech, Trump was back to his usual self, going on tweet binges about how President Barack Obama had tapped his phones."

A SOTU, the Slate journalist warns, can do damage when it gives "false senses of security."

"Some advice, then, to 2028 candidates for president: Promise to refuse a congressional invitation to address a joint session of Congress, and return Americans their regularly scheduled programming," Newell argues. "That can't hurt."

Trump's push for one-man rule can no longer be denied

The United States is now at war with Iran.

A single person, Donald J. Trump, has released the dogs of war on one of the most dangerous countries in the world — and done it without the consent of Congress or our allies, or even a clear explanation to the American people.

Four days after delivering a State of the Union address in which he boasted of ending eight wars and spent just three minutes discussing Iran and a preference for “diplomacy,” we are now bombing, maiming, and killing.

Anyone who has doubted Trump’s intention to replace American democracy with a dictatorship should now be fully disabused.

I share your despair, sadness, and fear. Even if our president were a wise and judicious man, surrounded by thoughtful advisers with impeccable integrity and wisdom, this would be a highly dangerous move.

Trump is facing the consequences of his decision in his first term to abandon the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action negotiated with Iran by Obama and backed by France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Russia, and China.

Trump walked away from that treaty because it was Obama’s — and he hates Obama because Obama negotiated safeguards against Iran enriching uranium to weapons grade. Obama also got Obamacare through Congress, addressed climate change and nuclear proliferation, and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Obama was a winner. Trump is a loser. Trump cannot stomach this.

But why should America and thousands if not millions of innocent people pay the price of Trump’s egomaniacal stupidity?

Trump claimed in June to have disarmed Iran. He claimed again in his State of the Union last Tuesday to have “obliterated” the Iranian nuclear weapons program (an assertion rejected by the International Atomic Energy Agency).

Since then, Iran has taken steps to dig out the nuclear facilities hit during those strikes and has resumed work at some sites long known to American spy agencies.

But those same spy agencies say there’s no evidence that Iran has made active efforts to resume enriching uranium or trying to build a mechanism to detonate a bomb.

Iran’s stockpiles of enriched uranium remain buried after June’s strikes, making it nearly impossible for Iran to build a bomb “within days,” as Trump and his lapdogs claim.

Trump says he wants “regime change.” But unlike Venezuela, the Islamic Republic has nearly a million men under arms. Any attempt to overthrow that regime will require American troops on the ground and almost surely inflict mass casualties on Americans and Iranians.

Besides, Trump won a second term promising “no regime change,” and in 2024 he campaigned as “the first president in decades who started no new wars.”

He hasn’t prepared the American people for this.

In his State of the Union, he said Iran has refused to foreswear any nuclear weapons ambitions. Yet just hours before his address, Iran’s foreign minister reaffirmed on X that his country would “under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon.”

Trump noted the Iran regime’s killing of thousands of protesters, but this hardly justifies a war that may cause the deaths of thousands more innocent civilians. (This morning, Iran’s Red Crescent said more than 60 children were killed in the strike on Shajarah Tayyebeh school in the southern town of Minab — a toll that has since been raised to 85.)

Make no mistake. The costs of this war — mayhem and deaths in the Middle East, higher oil prices (as Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz), increased risk of terrorism in Europe and the United States — could be catastrophic.

Yet Americans don’t support this war. They haven’t been told why we’re waging it. Trump’s MAGA base doesn’t want him to engage in regime change. Congress hasn’t voted for this war.

Trump is going to war for himself and his boundless, malicious ego.

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at Berkeley and former secretary of labor. His writings can be found at https://robertreich.substack.com/

Intensifying red state fight could topple GOP’s Senate majority: expert

Alaska is so Republican that a Democrat hasn't carried the state in a presidential election since Lyndon B. Johnson's victory over GOP Sen. Barry Goldwater in 1964. Yet according to polls, Alaska's 2026 U.S. Senate race is surprisingly close — with incumbent Sen. Dan Sullivan slightly ahead in some and Democratic nominee Mary Peltola slightly ahead in others. And if a statewide victory really is in play for Democrats in Alaska, according to Bloomberg News' Ronald Brownstein, it's a bad sign for the GOP in the midterms.

"Democrat Mary Peltola has many things breaking her way in her bid to unseat Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan in Alaska," Brownstein explains in a Bloomberg opinion column. "But Sullivan has one big thing working for him. Whether that's enough will likely determine whether he wins reelection — while also offering clues about the fate of other red-state Republican senators this year. Alaska is vast, sparsely populated and reliably Republican in federal races. Since entering the union in 1959, the state has elected only four Democrats to the Senate, and just one since 1980. But Alaska also has a quirky side."

Brownstein adds, "Although twice as many voters are registered as Republicans than as Democrats, more than half are unaffiliated. That can produce unexpected outcomes, as in 2022, when Peltola won a special election to succeed longtime Republican Rep. Don Young, who died in office. Peltola went on to win a full term that November."

One of the main issues Sullivan is attacking Peltola on, Brownstein notes, is oil. Peltola is on the record as a supporter of drilling for oil in her state, but in a debate, Sullivan, according to Brownstein, is arguing that "electing her would tip Senate control to Democrats hostile to Alaskan drilling."

"Peltola emphasized her personal commitment to oil development — including convincing former President Joe Biden to approve a massive ConocoPhillips project in Willow, Alaska," Brownstein observes. "But mostly, she seemed unsure how to respond. She never offered a clear rebuttal to his central claim — that electing her would inexorably 'empower' Senate liberals out of touch with Alaska. Sullivan tethered that argument to oil development. But versions of it, connected to different local concerns, are also available to Republican Senate candidates facing tough races in other red-leaning states, including Ohio, Iowa, Texas and North Carolina."

Brownstein continues, "Raising alarms about a Democratic-controlled Senate probably won't save all those GOP candidates. But inflaming the doubts red-state voters hold about the national Democratic Party may be the best chance for Senate Republicans to avoid the worst in a year that has already chilled their prospects far beyond Alaska."

Republican says he's ditching the party over one painful realization

A Republican voter in Iowa has decided to turn on his party and switch to a straight Democratic ticket after he says the GOP failed to deliver on what his parents taught him to believe.

Republican union member told Democratic state Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott why he decided to switch parties across the ballot in the upcoming midterms.

According to Punchbowl News, Trone Garriott, who is challenging Republican Rep. Zach Nunn in Iowa's 3rd Congressional District, said the man had grown frustrated with worsening conditions in his community despite years of Republican control.

“He said, ‘My parents told me if you vote Republican, your life will get better. Well, things are not getting better, and these guys have been in charge for a while, and we’ve got dirty water and cancer and rising costs,’” Trone Garriott recalled. “Folks just really want something different.”

The voter was not identified, but he echoes the polling data on how many Republican voters feel about the cost of living.

His change of mood with the Republican Party has left GOP candidates facing several competitive races in previously safe red districts. Iowa is among them, a state President Donald Trump carried by 13 percentage points in 2024, and it faces a difficult battle to hold its seats.

A CNN poll found that 40 percent of likely Iowa voters believe their financial situation has worsened over the past two years, and a stunning 74 percent lay the blame on Trump's policies for making the cost of living more expensive.

Republicans have a heated governor’s race on their hands as the Democratic candidate Rob Sand holds an approximately eight-point advantage over Republican Zach Lahn in the RealClearPolitics average. Other polls have Sand leading by a 5- to 12-point advantage.

At a Friday rally in Jefferson, Lahn accused Democrats of playing a statistical game to convince Iowans that life is “terrible” and accused them of attempting to divide people. Although he acknowledged that the cost of living is too high, he blamed Biden more than Trump’s politics. This contradicts the CNN poll of Iowa voters, in which a majority laid the blame on the president.

Other members of the Republican Party agree that the political scene has changed.

Joe Mitchell, the Republican candidate in Iowa's open second Congressional District, admitted the environment had become more difficult but doubted the Democrats could win broadly across the state.

At the same time, Christina Bohannan, the Democratic candidate for Congress challenging Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks, cited the high price of groceries, rising fuel costs, and the disappearance of rural health care services as examples of the difficulties voters face.

In 2024, Bohannan narrowly lost to Miller-Meeks, with the Republican ahead by just 799 votes.

The implications extend beyond individual congressional races, with Democrats aiming to take control of some competitive House districts and challenging Republican Representative Ashley Hinson in Iowa's closely watched Senate race against Democrat Josh Turek.

Top Republican defects to back Democrat in key battleground district

A former chair of the Republican National Committee and two-term GOP governor has endorsed a Democratic House candidate running for a battleground seat in Montana. According to MS NOW, “Marc Racicot, who won two terms as Montana’s governor in the 1990s before leading the RNC during George W. Bush’s first term, is set to endorse Sam Forstag’s bid for the state’s 1st Congressional District, currently held by a Republican.”

“He cares about what he’s doing. He’s very well prepared. He has the right priorities in terms of character and virtues and values and belief in the Constitution,” Racicot told MS NOW. “It’s not even a close call for me to stand in Sam’s corner.”

This is an important endorsement for the Democrats with the midterms just around the corner. The party is hoping to win the majority in the House, and to do so in purple-shaded red states like Montana requires the support of independents and Republicans who have been disappointed by President Donald Trump. Racicot – a critic of Trump – has backed a number of Democrats in recent years, including Joe Biden in 2020. As MS NOW explains, “The public embrace from Racicot could go toward helping the kind of crossover appeal Forstag likely needs to do what no Montana Democrat has been able to do since the 1990s: win a U.S. House seat in the state.”

The seat is currently held by a retiring Republican, and Forstag is running against Aaron Flint – a combat veteran and former conservative radio host who is running under Trump’s endorsement. According to MS NOW, “Forstag, who worked as a smokejumper after lobbying in Montana for the state’s American Civil Liberties Union wing, won a divided primary despite warnings from some critics that he was too liberal for the district. Since then, he’s built an unusual profile in a state where the national Democratic brand has proved corrosive. He is one of only a handful of congressional Democrats endorsed by both progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders and the centrist Blue Dog political outfit. Racicot’s support on top of that offers some Bush Republican-era nostalgia for voters as Forstag tries to cut into the state’s rightward drift.”

Polls currently indicate that the race is razor close. According to the latest survey, the two candidates are running dead even with 44 percent each. That's bad news for the Republican Party, which has been working to consolidate its hold on Montana, but is expected to take major losses in the midterms due to backlash from Trump's historic unpopularity.

“We’re in a hole that both parties have been digging for us,” Forstag said, urging support for a kind of Democrat “that could actually improve your life, and is actually going to prioritize doing so, because I know what it’s like on a day-to-day basis.”

Trump's latest move a ominous preview of the world war to come: analysis

President Donald Trump's foreign policy is such a disaster, it is returning the international community back to the conditions that existed before World War II — at least, according to one foreign policy expert.

As Trump meets with Chinese dictator Xi Jinping, threatens Iran with annihilation and fails to counter both China and Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, he is upending a world order that created stability for more than eighty years, argued Thomas Wright, Brookings Institution senior fellow and former senior director for strategic planning at the National Security Council for President Joe Biden, for The Atlantic on Wednesday.

"In his first book, 'A World Restored,' Henry Kissinger argued that a stable and legitimate order rests on a limited consensus: an understanding among the major powers about what he called the permissible aims and methods of foreign policy," Wright wrote. "Governments can compete intensely and violate rules without seeking to overturn the system itself. The danger arises when a major power becomes so dissatisfied with the limits imposed upon it that it adopts a revolutionary foreign policy."

He added, "Under the old international order, major powers did not, as a general rule, conquer and annex the territory of their neighbors. The global trading system was based on reciprocity, tariffs were historically low, and markets were relatively open. And, although it was the world’s strongest country, the United States exercised enough self-discipline to allow its allies to grow into genuine partners, not vassals to be constantly squeezed for concessions."

Wright then described how Russia and China have violated that world order, in the former case by invading Ukraine and in the latter by engaging in unfair trade practices.

"Since taking office for a second term, in 2025, Trump has turned American power against U.S. allies and partners," Wright said. "He imposed the highest tariffs in nearly a century on Canada, Japan, South Korea, India, and the European Union and used the threat of more to extract hundreds of billions of dollars in investment pledges. He mused about making Canada the 51st state and seizing Greenland. He pushed Ukraine to sign over a share of its mineral wealth in the middle of a war for its national survival. Under Trump, the United States sees itself not as the guarantor of an alliance system of like-minded democracies, but as a dominant power that wields its influence for singular, transactional gain."

He continued, "Trump has broken the restraint that made American primacy tolerable to most of the rest of the world. Reports suggest that he may meet Xi and Putin for a 'big three' trilateral on the margins of the Asia Pacific Economic Summit in Shenzhen in November, which could mark the formal end of the old order."

Ultimately, Wright said that a future American president will need to resign themselves to the fact that the old international order is over.

"The international order has come to an end," Wright wrote. "The next president will inherit one of the most unforgiving international environments since 1945. Their task will be to stop the deterioration, inject some stability into world affairs, and begin to lay the foundation for a better future, even if that is not achievable in the short term."

Speaking with AlterNet earlier in September, University of Massachusetts — Amherst professor Dr. Richard Wolff broke down the larger pattern in Trump's disintegration of the world order.

"The United States helped allied countries recover from the war with the Marshall Plan and things like that," Wolff told AlterNet. "But those, the beneficiary countries, including Western Europe and Japan, were markedly contrasted with the countries that got no help at all, Russia and China being the number one examples, because of communist control in Russia, and then after 1949 also in China. And so those countries had to make it, if you like, on their own. They had to recover from horrific war-related damage. I mean, Russia and China probably ranked one and two in the amount of damage done during and by World War II, before, during, and after it, as any countries on earth."

Also speaking with AlterNet in September, Dr. Ed Gresser, a trade expert at the Progressive Policy Institute, described Trump's fixation on Canada as "weird."

"He seems to have some real animus against Canada for reasons I don't understand," Gresser told AlterNet. "And that goes well beyond tariffs, although tariffs are kind of the main policy thing, but he's always sort of belittling Canada and calling it the 51st state and things like that. And it's just very — there must be — there seems to be something really personal involved in this, which I don't feel I have any insight into. It's just, it's weird."

The fatal mistake that just blew up a decades-old Republican strategy

It’s not working any more, this scam Republicans have been running for 45 years, although Trump and many others are trying their best to revive it.

Their strategy has always been simple: break things here in America, create chaos and a mess, hurt working class people while making billionaires richer, and then campaign on fixing what they screwed up.

Two years ago, Michigan Republican Mike Rogers stood in a grocery store for an advertisement blaming Joe Biden for the price of eggs (without mentioning the bird flu that was jacking prices). This week he’s back in nearly the same folksy jacket telling voters that it’s time for Trump to end his illegal war against Iran so gas prices can come down.

Rogers new ad leaves out, of course, the fact that he’d cheered for the war on the day it began in February, claiming Iran was an imminent threat to the United States (it wasn’t and isn’t), and hit multiple rightwing podcasts and media opportunities to demand Americans unite behind Trump in prosecuting the war.

He’s not alone. Just last week, Iowa Republican Ashley Hinson voted to keep the war going — after voting six times previously to support Trump and his war — but a few days ago cut a desperate ad calling for a swift end to the fighting.

Iowa Republicans Zach Nunn and Mariannette Miller-Meeks, both in tight House races, suddenly discovered the War Powers Act and joined Democrats to limit the president they’d been backing. Down in Florida, Republican Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar released an ad warning that Miller’s brutal masked goons have gone too far and that Hispanic voters now feel betrayed.

Americans have noticed who lit these particular fires. A New York Times/Siena poll this month found 50 percent of registered voters trust Democrats over Republicans to handle foreign wars, and GOP whackadoodle Nancy Mace, on her way out of Congress, told reporters she’s expecting a “bloodbath” at the polls this November.

Trump himself, asked on Meet the Press how a seven-month war squares with two campaigns with hundreds of promises of no new wars, answered that he “didn’t promise anything” and stormed out of the interview like a petulant 10-year-old.

This is just the latest in a 45-year-long Republican scam where they break something in America, blame it on the Democrats, and then run for election on a promise to fix what they broke.

Probably their most successful of these scams since the Clinton years has been to invite non-citizens from south of the border to come into the US whenever a Democrat is in the White House, falsely claiming that the Democrat had “opened the border.” This lie, of course, encourages desperate people to head north and that gives the GOP and their media operations the photo-op they need.

Just google “open border” and “congressman,” “congresswoman,” or “senator” and you’ll get a list of Republican politicians too long to print. These are the quotes that coyotes — human smugglers — print out and distribute to desperate people in Central and South America as advertisements to get people to trade their lives’ savings for transportation to the Rio Grande.

Not one single Democratic president ever “opened” the border or declared it open. It’s a complete lie, top to bottom, that Republicans and billionaire-owned media repeat obsessively.

Obama, in fact, deported more people than Trump did in his first term. But Republicans still use that lie to roll out the red carpet to wannabe immigrants.

At the top of that list of Republicans lying about Democrats “opening the border,” of course, you’ll find the most contemptible Republican demagogues cranking this stuff out during the last two years of Biden’s presidency so they could use the immigrant issue to get Trump back into the White House in 2024. Here’s a tiny sample from the months leading up to recent elections:

— Ted Cruz wants everybody south of our border to know that the “Biden Open Border Policy [is] A Very Craven Political Decision”;
— Rick Scott wants everybody to know that “Americans Don’t Want [Biden’s] Open Borders”;
— Marco Rubio says there’s “Nothing Compassionate About Biden’s Open Border Policies”;
— Rand Paul is so extreme he tells us Senator Rubio “is the one for an open border”;
— Josh Hawley says “Biden’s Open Border Policy Has Created a Moral Crisis”;
— Tom Cotton “Insists the Border is Wide Open”;
— Ron Johnson wants the world to know that “Our National Security is at Risk Because Democrats have Turned Border Security into a Partisan Issue”;
— Marjorie Taylor Greene “BLASTS Open Border Hypocrites”;
— Mo Brooks opposes “Socialist Democrats’ Open Border Policies for Helping Kill Americans”;
— Lauren Boebert says the “Root Cause” of the open border crisis “is in the White House”;
— Matt Gaetz “revealed a complex and deceitful agenda by Joe Biden’s Democrat administration to evade our Southern Border law enforcement”;
— Gym Jordan says “Biden’s Deliberate Support of Illegal Immigration Could Lead to Impeachment”;
— Kevin McCarthy says the Biden Administration has “Utterly Failed” to secure the “open border”;
— Elise Stefanik proclaims “Biden’s Open Border Policies have been a Complete Disaster.”
— Tom Cole’s website features “Biden’s Open Border America”;
— Bob Goode brags about introducing legislation named the “Close Biden’s Open Border Act”;
— John Rose “Calls Out Biden’s Open Border Policies”;
— Paul Gosar claims Biden is “Destroying America with His Open Border Policies”;
— Roger Williams complains about the “Democrats’ Open Border Problem”;
— Tom Cole wants the world to know that Biden’s “open border policies have given the green light to migrants and bad actors from around the world…”;
— Gus Bilirakis “Denounces Dangerous Open Border Policies on the House Floor”;

The list goes on and on, every single one from a Republican.

And these messages have spread all across Central and South America, just as Republicans hoped they would, driven by human smugglers following the profit motive.

All based on an intentional Republican campaign lie that has worked well for them since they first used it on Clinton in the 1990s.

And here we go again, although this time Marjorie Taylor Greene called you-know-what on her former colleagues.

Last Thursday, around 400 Hondurans — families with kids among them — crossed a bridge from Guatemala into Chiapas, Mexico on foot. Rightwing influencers, knowing the drill, immediately began to promote this new coming “invasion.” PJ Media ran the story under a headline that literally tied the caravan to a coming Democratic Congress.

Marjorie Taylor Greene was having none of it, though, writing on social media.

Yep, it’s an old scam but an effective one. Essentially, what Republicans have been doing — since Reagan first told us government was our problem and he’d take care of ruining it for us — is to smash out our windows and then offer to sell us homeowners’ insurance.

It’s a hustle. Just like “trickle down.” And “small government,” “waste, fraud, and abuse,” “guns keep us safe,” “global warming is a hoax,” and “originalism.”

Greene would know. In October 2018, two weeks before the midterms the last time he was president, she cheered when Trump declared a caravan a thousand miles from Texas an “invasion,” ordered a showy force of 5,200 troops to the border, and told Republicans that it’d be a great midterm issue for them.

In the seven days before Election Day that year Fox News used the word “caravan” 1,202 times.

In an astonishing display of transparent cynicism, the Pentagon dropped the operation’s patriotic name the morning after the polls closed, and the troops were going home two weeks later. All the panic vanished the day after the election, weeks before most of the migrants got anywhere near our border.

Then in 2024, with Biden in the White House, Republicans demanded an immigration/border bill, got the most conservative one in a generation from their own senator, James Lankford, and then were forced to kill it because Trump wanted to crank up his racist base with fears of brown-skinned hordes on the march to regain the White House.

That’s the entire Republican business model, and it’s older than Trump. Republicans manufacture the fear, or the crisis, or the deficit, and then campaign as the only people who can protect you from it. The “product” never has to work, because fear is their real product and has been since the days of Joe McCarthy.

Ronald Reagan set it up in its modern form. In 1976 Jude Wanniski, a Wall Street Journal editorial writer, told Republican insiders they’d never win as the party of Scrooge and should instead become a second Santa Claus, handing out tax cuts as freely as Democrats handed out programs, then screaming about the debt the moment a Democrat took office.

Reagan cut the top income tax rate from 70 percent to 28, tripled the national debt, and sold it with a promise of prosperity for everybody. Republicans (and Reagan) knew it was a lie; his former budget director, David Stockman, admitted as much in The Atlantic before Reagan’s first term was half over.

And now that scam has transferred almost $80 trillion from working people into the money bins of the top 1 percent, gutting the middle class, and Republicans are still pitching billionaire tax cuts as the cure for all our ills.

Then there’s the destruction of America’s small businesses so big business fatcats would back the GOP. Reagan’s Justice Department rewrote the merger guidelines in 1982 and the share of proposed mergers the government challenged fell to seven-tenths of one percent, which is how we ended up with a small handful of companies controlling our grocery chains, hospital systems, airlines, insurance, banking, drugs, retail, and even the oil companies that Rogers is now complaining about in his bizarre new ads.

And let’s not forget freezing the wages of workers, as I mentioned here last week. Reagan fired the air traffic controllers and union membership fell from about a third of our workforce when he took office to under a tenth today, and every Republican since has campaigned on pretending to be in favor of raising your pay while, with their other hand behind their back, voting in Congress to freeze the minimum wage and make it harder for people to form or join a union.

Once they’d gotten away with these scams and still gotten elected (with the help of billionaire-owned media), governing by scam became the GOP’s go-to habit.

They’ve kept the federal minimum wage frozen at $7.25 since 2009 and are running this fall on “affordability.”

They passed a “Big Beautiful” bill last summer that the Congressional Budget Office says will add $3.4 trillion to our debt, knock 10 million people off their health insurance, and cut more than a trillion dollars from Medicaid and food assistance.

And, the CBO found, the result is (predictably) that resources will decrease for households at the bottom while rising for those at the top. Four million fewer people are getting SNAP already, because of that bill. And you can bet your bottom dollar that when this really bites over the next two years Republicans will be blaming Democrats and offering to fix the problems that they themselves created.

Then Trump began throwing around tariffs, particularly against countries he wanted to give him gifts, jets, or business deals for Uday and Qusay, all while cynically pretended it’d bring manufacturing back to the US and raise wages.

Republicans have, in other words, spent the past forty-five years telling us our “big” government is the problem while expanding its reach into your doctor’s office, your ballot, and now your constitutional right to walk down the street without getting shot by ICE thugs or having to show your citizenship papers to a masked man who refuses to identify himself.

Each of these moves was sold as a rescue from a problem the Republicans themselves had created, vibrating with urgency in the last few weeks before an election.

What’s different this year is that the timing has blown up in their faces.

When a war hawk like Rogers, whose own former primary opponent Justin Amash says he’s losing badly, goes soft on a war he championed, or when a sitting president says he never promised the thing his rallies chanted for two years, people can suddenly see the scam in the plain light of day. Even the caravan, the oldest trick in the book, drew a former MAGA congresswoman outing this strategy to her own followers.

Reagan got a laugh in 1986 by saying the nine most terrifying words in the English language were “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” Forty-five years and the DOGE gutting of FEMA on, nobody’s laughing except the Republicans who keep getting elected by low-information voters hooked on billionaire-owned media.

The simple reality — that previous generations understood well — is that government is the only institution with the power to lay a floor beneath which working people and the poor can’t fall, whether that floor is a wage, a pension, an education, a hospital bed, or a border policy that’s actually enforced instead of advertised.

Republicans have spent four decades pulling up the floorboards and then charging admission to watch people fall through. This November they’re asking to be paid again to fix the problems they themselves created. The polls, however, are telling us that even formerly Republican voters have finally figured out the con.

So check your registration at vote.org, because the caravan story will be replaced by another outrageous panic next week (trans people? Iran strikes back at us in a 9/11 style? the “caravan” arrives?) and the only thing that beats a fear campaign is turnout.

And if this piece helped you see the pattern, please share it and support the Hartmann Report so we can keep pulling these threads and exposing these cons.

GOP congressman in swing district suddenly declares: 'I am an independent'

After nearly a decade in Congress as a Republican, Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick is leaning hard on a different label as he fights for survival in a swing district.

“I am an independent who is registered Republican,” Fitzpatrick told The Washington Sun, which profiled his reelection battle in Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional District.

While he has always cultivated a moderate image, Fitzpatrick went further when asked about his place in the GOP. “I’m a registered Republican. There’s a difference,” he said, adding that if Pennsylvania allowed independents to participate in party primaries, he would leave the GOP and register as an independent.

“Right now, I’m homeless,” he said.

The comments come as Fitzpatrick faces Democrat Bob Harvie in a district that President Donald Trump lost in 2016, 2020 and 2024. Despite that terrain, Fitzpatrick has repeatedly survived, with his closest race coming in 2018, when he won by just over 2.5 percentage points.

The Washington Sun reported that Fitzpatrick is now running a more aggressive campaign than in past cycles, spending millions on negative advertising against Harvie while presenting himself as the same independent-minded Republican voters have known for years.

“I personally feel very, very close to my district,” Fitzpatrick said. “I’m more present than him by a factor of 10.”

Harvie is trying to puncture that image by tying Fitzpatrick to Trump and the Republican leadership. His campaign has highlighted Fitzpatrick’s vote for an initial version of Trump’s policy bill and a procedural vote that delayed release of the Epstein files.

“He’s hiding from his record, and we’re not going to let him hide from his record,” Harvie told The Sun.

Fitzpatrick has nevertheless broken with his party on several high-profile issues. An Inquirer analysis published last month found that he has voted with Trump’s stated positions about 70% of the time during the current Congress, less frequently than any other House Republican. He has also supported same-sex marriage, an assault-weapons ban and former President Joe Biden’s bipartisan infrastructure law.

Fitzpatrick said he tries to keep Trump out of his decision-making altogether. “I take him out of the equation,” he told The Sun. The congressman also offered a more nuanced explanation for why he no longer feels at home inside either major party.

“The two parties have become cults,” Fitzpatrick said.

That posture has helped him build an unusual coalition in Bucks County, including endorsements from labor unions and environmental groups that often support Democrats. But Harvie argues that Fitzpatrick’s moderate brand masks important votes with Republicans.

With Pennsylvania Democrats investing in the district, Fitzpatrick’s attempt to separate his political identity from his party may face its most consequential test yet this November.

'Dangerous strategy': GOP pollster says Trump's latest move could backfire

Republican pollster Frank Luntz is sounding the alarm for Democrats that, while they're expected to win back control of Congress if President Donald Trump manages to convince his MAGA loyalists to support Republicans, it may not be the blowout that is expected. That said, Luntz cautioned it's a "dangerous" strategy.

CNN's Audi Cornish on Monday asked Luntz whether pretending Trump is on the ballot would ultimately help or hurt.

"I'm looking at a turnout differential that advantages the Democrats by a couple of points, which means that there are more people who oppose Donald Trump who are planning to vote, and those who support him," he began.

That could change if Trump manages to excite the supporters who remain with him.

"Now, here's the issue," Luntz continued. "When he is on the ballot, his people come out. They participate. They did in the on-year elections 2016 and 2024. And they did not in 2018. And they did not as much. Even when Joe Biden was the president [after] 2020 for the 2022 election. So that's what he's trying to do. His numbers, his support is not as strong today as it has been in the past. So, it's a very dangerous strategy."

Those key places he must bring his voters to the polls are traditionally red states like Texas, said Luntz. After voting Sen. John Cornyn (R) out of the Senate, his GOP challenger, Ken Paxton, isn't exciting voters. In fact, it's the opposite.

Other states he mentioned are Iowa, Alaska and Ohio.

"If the Trump voters don't participate, the Democrats will achieve an upset," he said. "So, I understand the strategy, but it has multiple impacts we need to take into account as we start to make projections for election day."

Key voting groups analysts and pollsters have been watching are Latino voters, who supported Trump in 2024, but as his deportation efforts turned into a very different operation than what he campaigned on, the demographic has abandoned him.

"But he saw the difference. He saw what it did to his own support and what it did for senators and congressmen who are running at the same time," said Luntz. "The other group I'm looking at are male union voters, who moved towards the Republicans in historic levels in 2024. The third group is younger voters, voters under the age of 30 who cast more votes for Donald Trump again in 2024, more than they usually do."

These groups also supported Republicans down the ballot.

"And I have a simple challenge to vote to people who watch how voters are reacting: If Trump can keep the House and keep the Senate, he has proven how powerful he is," Luntz cautioned.

He also said that despite that, Trump has no more influence on races than any other Republican in history. The difference this time around is that "voters are angry, and they want results, not rhetoric."

Voters expect Trump to make changes based on their votes in November when it comes to the top issues like the war in Iran and the affordability crisis.

"And I'd say one more thing to people who are working for donald Trump, you can bash the pollsters all you want on Election Day is, the great quote John Wooden said, 'The votes are the votes. The results are the results.' And I think this is going to be a challenge for GOP candidates," said Luntz.

The caveat is whether people still believe in Trump enough to stage an upset.

- YouTube youtu.be



'Lost control': DC insider pulls back curtain on 'fringe MAGA'

In the UK, the MAGA movement has been allying itself with the far-right/populist Reform Party — which is vehemently disdainful of Britain's Conservative Party in much the same way that MAGA disdains traditional conservatives in the United States. Former White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre examines this MAGA/Reform alliance in an article for the UK-based i Paper, arguing that it is a dire "warning" on far-right movement's ability to exploit widespread "frustration" and discontent.

Liberal Jean-Pierre, who served in the Biden administration after Jen Psaki (now an MS NOW host) left her White House press secretary position, explains, "Since leaving the White House in 2025 with Donald Trump returning to power, I have spent the past two years listening to people who feel politically unanchored. Voters in the United States and the United Kingdom are turning to movements that promise simple answers to complicated problems because they no longer believe the major parties see what they see or feel what they feel. The appeal of Reform, Restore and fringe MAGA figures grows out of that frustration, and the links between Nigel Farage and American political voices show how these narratives travel across borders and feed the same fears."

Although Jean-Pierre, in her i Paper article, is highly critical of MAGA and Reform, she emphasizes that the "frustration" that they are trying to use to their advantage is quite real.

"After more than 15 years working in U.S. politics, including service to two presidents and most recently as White House press secretary," Jean-Pierre warns, "I have watched how quickly trust erodes when institutions fall behind the pressures people face. I sat in senior-level briefings where immigration, border security and crime were not abstractions but daily operational challenges."

Far-right MAGA Republican and "War Room" host Steve Bannon often describes himself as a "Leninist" — not because he favors communism, but because he embraces Soviet Union leader Vladimir Lenin's view that it is necessary to destroy in order to create. Jean-Pierre notes Bannon's alliance with Farage, describing "disruption rather than governance" as a key goal of MAGA and its UK counterparts.

"Movements like Reform UK and Rupert Lowe's breakaway party, Restore Britain, have stepped into that space with messages that feel direct and uncomplicated," Jean-Pierre observes. "They speak to voters who believe the country has lost control of its borders and who worry that national identity is slipping away. In the U.S., fringe MAGA voices push a similar story. They argue that institutions have failed and that only disruption can restore order. These groups do not operate in isolation. They borrow from one another, repeat one another and amplify one another…. The major parties do not need better slogans. They need to rebuild trust by addressing the underlying issues that have pushed voters away."

Jean-Pierre continues, "They need to modernize immigration systems, strengthen border management and speak honestly about crime and public safety. They need to reconnect with the realities people face and show they understand the pressures shaping daily life. If they do not, the political landscape on both sides of the Atlantic will continue to shift toward movements that thrive on fear rather than on solutions. And voters will continue to look for answers in places the major parties never expected."

'Very scary': Diehard Republicans flirt with the unthinkable in Trump country

GRAPEVINE — Jill Tate has spent 30 years building and maintaining the Republican majority in Texas.

In all that time, she’s never been more worried about an election.

“This is truly the first time I’ve felt in my bones we could lose the Texas House, and we could lose a statewide seat,” Tate said. “And that’s very scary.”

Now president of Texas Federation of Republican Women, Tate organizes over 10,000 women who do the hard work behind the party’s dominant grassroots operation — calling and texting voters, block walking, producing voter guides and sending postcards.

If her fears come to pass, it could be Tate’s backyard — the fast-growing, diverse suburbs of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex — that delivers Texas to the Democrats.

Long associated with the country club types who formed a backbone of red Texas, the area is in the midst of enormous change driven by rapid population growth, corporate relocations and shifting political views in the Trump era.

The change makes suburban voters — and suburban women in particular — a key swing bloc that U.S. Senate candidates Ken Paxton and James Talarico are chasing this November.

But with the election less than six weeks away, Republicans worry the region’s typically reliable voters, disenchanted by Paxton’s political baggage, could sit out the Senate race, a hesitancy that also could endanger GOP candidates for the Legislature, county commission and justices of the peace.

In interviews with over a dozen people in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, many Republicans said they were struggling with how to vote in the Senate contest or knew friends and neighbors who were.

Jayne Howell, who chaired the Denton County GOP from 2018 to 2022, said that six months ago, she was leaning toward not voting in the Senate race. Now, she’s decided to vote for Paxton — but she knows not everyone has had the same evolution.

“I felt like he was going to vote for more conservative policies than his opponent,” Howell said at a coffee shop in Lewisville, a suburb about 25 miles north of Dallas. “So I’m going to vote for Paxton. It goes against my personal beliefs, but I don’t want Talarico to win. But I think there’s a lot of people that aren’t going to even come out to vote. That’s going to affect the down-ballot races.”

Some, describing their hesitation or opposition as faith-based, cited accusations of extramarital affairs by Paxton. His wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, cited adultery in her 2025 divorce petition.

Some voters lumped Paxton in with a GOP they have soured on during President Donald Trump’s second term. Others were turned off by allegations of corruption stemming from a 2015 indictment for felony securities fraud (charges were dropped in 2024 after Paxton, who didn’t admit guilt, agreed to 100 hours of community service, 15 hours of ethics training and $271,000 in restitution) and 2023 articles of impeachment accusing him of misusing his office to benefit a friend and political donor (the Texas Senate voted to acquit him after a two-week trial).

Dan Pence, a 68-year-old in Rowlett, has voted Republican in nearly every election in his life. After voting for Trump in 2024, he’s found himself frustrated with the direction of the party. He still believes he will stick with Republicans for most statewide races, but he’s undecided in the Senate contest — and leaning toward Talarico, whom he thinks he could “hold my nose” and vote for. Paxton, he said, is a bridge too far.

“I can’t verbalize how much I dislike that guy,” Pence said. “I wouldn’t even want to be in the same room as him. He exudes slimy.”

In the 2024 presidential election, nearly one in four Texas votes came from the region’s core four counties — Dallas, Tarrant, Collin and Denton — making them enormously important to both candidates’ hopes for success. The suburban area was a Republican stronghold before 2016 but has trended more blue in recent election cycles.

Democrats flipped Tarrant County in the 2018 U.S. Senate race and narrowly won the county in the 2024 Senate race even as the state lurched right. Collin County, home to Plano and Frisco, has remained narrowly red despite statewide shifts, with Beto O’Rourke, Joe Biden and Colin Allred receiving 46% to 47% of the vote despite running in wildly different cycles. Even Denton County, traditionally the most Republican of the bunch, has seen slippage in GOP support after Trump won by 20 points in 2016 and 13.1 points in 2024.

To succeed in these counties, the Republican turnout operation will need to convert the hesitant.

The Texas Federation of Republican Women this fall will host weekends of mass action in Tarrant, Williamson and Collin counties — all with significant suburban populations — to promote state-level and down-ballot Republican candidates and encourage voters to support the entire ticket.

In addition, numerous GOP candidates and organizers said they are emphasizing to friends and neighbors the old adage that a vote is a chess move rather than a valentine.

“I have tried to say to some of our ladies who are not especially enthusiastic about voting for [Paxton] — and it’s not just him, there’s some other candidates [who are] not their favorite — we may not have perfect candidates, because we’re all human,” Tate said. “We all make mistakes. But we have perfect ideals.”

Kronda Thimesch, a former Republican state representative from Denton County who voted to impeach Paxton and then lost a GOP primary, is president of her local Republican women’s club. She said friends from church with deeply held biblical values are struggling with how to vote this November, and in some cases are so put off by Paxton that they’re planning to skip the election entirely.

“There are a lot of people that I’ve been having conversations with, [telling them] if you can’t vote for one Republican, please continue to go down ballot and vote for the rest,” said Thimesch, who lost her 2024 primary to Paxton impeachment attorney Mitch Little. “But unfortunately, a lot of people, they don’t even want to walk into the polling location and vote — which is disheartening.”

Despite hesitation from some voters, Paxton can still expect to get hundreds of thousands of votes out of these counties. Trump, as Paxton has noted, has been dogged by some of the same ethical baggage yet won Tarrant, Collin and Denton counties in 2024 en route to a blowout in the state.

His campaign believes it has a compelling story to tell suburban women. One pro-Paxton ad focuses on a sex trafficking case that his office prosecuted. And the campaign plans to emphasize the attorney general’s record pursuing consumer protection lawsuits on issues suburban women care about.

“Suburban moms want someone who will actually fight the people putting their kids in harm’s way: Big Food, Big Pharma, and Big Tech,” Paxton spokesperson Madison Cercy said in a statement, citing the attorney general’s lawsuits targeting misleading food labeling, forever chemicals and social media platforms that create addiction among kids.

“They’re not looking for someone who treats their kids upbringing as a social experiment and views public safety as optional,” Cercy said. “Ken Paxton is the fighter they have already trusted and the one they need, and that is the message our campaign will be bringing to them.”

Polling suggests Paxton still has work to do to consolidate the Republican base — work that the various groups making up the Republican ground game are undertaking as get-out-the-vote efforts ramp up. Down-ballot candidates also are working their territories across the region, well aware of the stakes the Senate race could pose.

Shelby Williams, a former Collin County GOP chair now running for county commission in a purple district in the west of the county, said he leads with local policy — infrastructure, property taxes, water — rather than his partisan allegiance. He has heard people “here and there” say they’re planning to skip the Senate race. Like Tate, he wants voters to see that the election is a binary choice and encourages them to look at both candidates’ records.

“Especially amongst the Christian right — and I am a devout Christian — there’s a tendency to look at the stains and say, well I can’t get behind so-and-so,” Williams said. “Well, OK, you have to inspect the alternative — even if the alternative is an undervote. You’re going to vote for something, even if it’s by your inaction.”

The Paxton campaign is emphasizing the dangers of an undervote as well.

“The stakes are clear: if voters stay home in the suburbs, they are not sitting out a personality contest. They are leaving their kids’ food, phones, schools, and streets to the politician who has proven he will not fight those fights,” Cercy said.

Ross Hunt, a GOP operative in Dallas, said the Republican base rapidly consolidated behind Paxton after he secured the nomination in May, but the pace and intensity has not been uniform across regions.

Hunt said he is more concerned about Republicans skipping the Senate race in North Texas than in other parts of the state.

“Consolidation has been stronger — not universally — but it’s been stronger in other areas of the state than it has been in D-FW,” Hunt said. “And some of that has to do with the fact that we just have more George Bush-style Republicans up here. That’s part of it. Some of it I think has to do with the fact that we have a lot of voters up here who are economically motivated, and are not really culture warriors at all, and are looking for someone who’s focused on those issues.”

What’s troubling the suburbs

Laura Hill, the Republican mayor of Southlake from 2015 to 2021, hasn’t missed an election since Gerald Ford was president.

Hill runs in a wide circle of women in the Dallas-Fort Worth suburbs — women she described as successful, well-educated and politically engaged. But this cycle, many of them have told her they’re planning to skip the Senate race on their ballots. Hill intends to do the same — and feels like the GOP political culture in Tarrant County has left her feeling increasingly unwelcome, particularly after losing a 2022 Texas House primary that she said included personal attacks on her businesses, employees and parents.

“I think we’ve created monsters — and that’s what my friends are saying,” Hill said. “We’ve all done things that we’ve had to ask for forgiveness, and that is between us and our Lord. But at some point, you no longer speak for the Lord when you continue to have to ask for forgiveness and you have a chosen lifestyle. Live it! But don’t tell me that I need to vote for you just because you are a Republican.”

Hill said among the skeptical Republican women she’s talked to, about 40 percent plan to vote for Talarico.

Dorothy Burton, the former Republican mayor pro tem of Duncanville, left the GOP in 2019 and now considers herself partyless. A member of Republicans for Talarico, Burton believes there’s a quiet network of Republicans planning to pull the lever for the Democrat while continuing to vote with the GOP in other races.

Being a Republican, she said, is about more than a party — it’s an identity. But she believes the willingness by some in the GOP to criticize Paxton will let more Bush-aligned Republicans vote for Talarico — or skip the race — without feeling like they’re compromising that identity.

“Now that some have given permission that it is OK to vote for Talarico, it’s like, I can do that and still be Republican,” Burton said.

John Huffman, a Republican who followed Hill as Southlake mayor and finished third in the initial special election for Senate District 9 in the Fort Worth area, has been a vocal critic of his party’s direction and the political doom he believes it could bring in November.

“I especially think suburban women — but maybe just your average suburban professional in Tarrant County and elsewhere — looks at Paxton, and looks at the personal and the professional and political baggage he comes with, and starts to think: is this the best we have?” Huffman said. “Is this really the best we can do as Republicans?”

A good portion of the more establishment wing of the party will likely come home for Paxton. Republican advertising has gone hard on Talarico, criticizing his record on taxes and comments supporting transgender Texans, to drive home the point that a Talarico victory would be anathema to their values.

Darlene Stanaland, a 79-year-old in Frisco, voted for Paxton in the primary and plans to vote for him again in the general election.

Stanaland first met Paxton, a longtime fixture in Collin County politics, years ago at a Tea Party protest outside Frisco City Hall. She appreciated that Paxton was active in filing legal challenges against the Biden administration.

“He at least fights for Texas,” Stanaland said. “That’s more than most of them do.”

Stanaland, a lifelong Republican who never misses an election, said her social circle is also firmly behind Paxton.

“Everybody’s got a past and everybody’s got a personal life, and that’s not what this is about,” she said. “This is about conserving our state, and I think he does that.”

But Huffman, who said he cannot vote for Paxton and likely will skip the Senate race, believes the Republican Party will leave votes on the table — support it potentially cannot afford to lose.

“As a candidate, you're trying to sell yourself — and you sell on trust,” Huffman said. “And there are so many issues with Paxton. He has broken trust with many, many people. I think for him particularly, you are testing the outer limits of the average general election voter's ability to be loyal to the concept of lesser of two evils.”

Several lifelong Republican voters from the Dallas-Fort Worth suburbs echoed Huffman’s sentiment.

Kelly Sayre, a 75-year-old in Corinth, was once the Denton County GOP vice chair. But he became disillusioned with the GOP after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol; in 2024, he voted for Kamala Harris for president and Ted Cruz for Senate.

Sayre said he thinks he’ll vote for Talarico this November — both as an opportunity to vote against Trump and Paxton (“I just don’t believe he’s a good person”) and because he sees something positive in the Democratic seminarian.

“After 10 or 12 years of name-calling and outright cruelty, I don’t see that coming from him,” Sayre said. “People feel differently about this, but for me, it’s important in that I see him to be a practicing Christian that’s far closer to living like we’re supposed to live than the alternative.”

Betty Graham, an 82-year-old in Plano, is a lifelong Republican who voted for Trump two years ago. A native of West Texas, she recalled meeting George H.W. Bush at a fundraiser in Abilene in the 1980s and working on a Republican campaign in Nolan County. But she’s been disappointed by the president’s second term — especially over the Iran war and the administration’s pursuit of border infrastructure in Big Bend National Park and surrounding areas.

Graham has come to regret her Trump vote and finds herself heartbroken by the direction of the party. She could have voted for Cornyn, she said, but refuses to vote for Paxton. Now, she considers herself an independent — and she’s planning to skip the race or vote Libertarian. Voting for a Democrat is out of the question.

“I can’t, in good conscience, vote on any of the Republicans,” Graham said. “And I certainly am not going to vote on the Democrat, because I don’t believe their ideology at all.”

Democrats see an opportunity

Voters like Graham represent the potential and the pitfalls for Talarico.

Every Republican voter who skips the contest helps the Democrat, but to win, Talarico also needs to pick up crossover and independent support. Republicans are now spending tens of millions to emphasize Talarico’s negatives in the hope of moving unsure or unmotivated Republicans into Paxton’s camp.

This is not the first statewide race where Democrats have looked to the suburbs for an edge — and in the past, they’ve ultimately been disappointed. In 2018, O’Rourke posted the best results Democrats had seen in decades in Tarrant, Collin and Denton counties but still lost to Cruz by 2.6 percentage points. In 2020, Biden saw record high Democratic vote totals and similar percentages to O’Rourke but lost the state by 5 points. And even as Allred achieved similar results in Tarrant, Collin and Denton counties as his Democratic predecessors, he lost to Cruz by a larger margin in 2024 as his party underperformed in the urban cores and in South Texas.

The results beg the question: Are there enough untapped suburban votes for Talarico and Democrats to capitalize on?

State Sen. Taylor Rehmet, a Garland mechanic and union leader, represents the bullish case for Democrats. In a district Trump won by 17 points in 2024, Rehmet emerged from a January special election with a 14-point victory in a Tarrant County district that contains a portion of Fort Worth and its northern suburbs. Special elections, with smaller totals, can produce unusual results — but Rehmet’s victory in Senate District 9 inspired enormous Democratic enthusiasm.

Democrats see opportunity beyond dissatisfied Republicans — enthusiasm driving increased turnout by their voters and swings away from the GOP in the suburban Hispanic population. Rehmet relied on both in his shocking special election victory in Tarrant County.

“People are targeting the working class folks,” said Allison Campolo, chair of the Tarrant County Democratic Party. “We are a county with a huge amount of working class people, but also a lot of union people — Lockheed Martin, Bell Helicopter, a bunch of others. And so making sure that these working-class union voters know who's standing up for workers' rights, affordability and good jobs is a really big deal.”

Majority-Hispanic precincts shifted by an average of 34 percentage points toward Rehmet relative to the 2022 race for the Senate district. Jason Villalba, a former Republican state representative from Dallas who runs the Texas Hispanic Policy Foundation, said even with the usual caveats about low turnout in special elections, the size of the Hispanic vote swing toward Rehmet was too large to be dismissed.

He suspects the swing is not limited to Fort Worth.

“You’re seeing similar effects, at least anecdotally, in all of the major suburbs,” Villalba said. “Plano is largely Hispanic … we’re seeing the same trends. Arlington, Grand Prairie, Cedar Hill, Mansfield — all of it showing the same trends.”

Democrats also believe a bevy of newer issues — frustration with data centers and Flock cameras among them — will drive voters toward the party. Numerous Democrats also said the state’s ban on several hemp-derived THC products is an issue they’re hearing a surprising amount about as they campaign door to door.

Delia Parker-Mims, chair of the Denton County Democratic Party, said THC could be a sleeper issue for suburban women and younger voters. There are smoke shops, she said, in the more middle class and well-to-do suburbs, and middle-age women are increasingly using THC products for health reasons.

“[Housewives] are into THC, and now you’re taking that away,” Parker-Mims said. “I do think that is pissing a lot of people off.”

Some Republicans agree that this cycle is different from past ones. Many emphasized that in 2018, when Republicans narrowly held onto victory, Cruz had the Republican Party unified behind him.

But in the Metroplex, some no longer see that enthusiasm. Several GOP voters who plan to leave the Senate race blank or vote for Talarico also stressed they would’ve had no trouble voting for Cornyn.

Hill consistently voted for Cornyn and Cruz, saying they “carry themselves in a manner that is important to our party.”

“I think because we have so much power and we think Republicans are untouchable in Texas, we’ve decided that we can put up anybody,” she said.

This article first appeared on The Texas Tribune.

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.