Search results for "Afghanistan"

Trump 'wiped away' programs that may have stopped alleged DC shooter: expert

The alleged perpetrator of the recent shooting of two National Guard members in downtown Washington D.C. may have been kept out of American society if not for budget cuts by President Donald Trump's administration.

That's according to #AfghanEvac President Shawn VanDiver, who told MS NOW on Thursday that alleged shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal – an Afghan national who came to the United States in September of 2021 — could have potentially been stopped before carrying out his act. He cited the 2024 arrest of 19 year-old Afghan national Abdullah Haji Zada, who was apprehended for plotting an Election Day mass shooting in Oklahoma City, as an example of how federal resources can work to prevent acts of terrorism before they happen.

"Nobody should ever have to endure this gun violence that's endemic in our American society. And look, the truth is that this man alone is responsible for his crime. His actions do not represent the Afghan community or Afghan wartime allies, or anybody who stood with us for 20 years," VanDiver said. "In fact, the FBI's own watchdog confirmed that the vetting systems worked under Kash Patel in in June of 2025. He said there were no systemic failures, so we don't necessarily know what failed yet. But we do know that there are law enforcement mechanisms in place to identify lone wolves, and that worked before the last election, when the man in Oklahoma City was identified and taken out."

"All sorts of people have tried to do these lone wolf attacks. President Trump, through DOGE, wiped away all of the mechanisms meant to protect our American society from that," he continued. "So I would encourage DHS, the FBI, law enforcement around this country to reallocate resources away from stunts at Home Depot and picking up grandmas at immigration court back to the places that keep our country safe."

VanDiver's organization, #AfghanEvac, works to resettle Afghan refugees fleeing the Taliban — particularly those who helped the United States during its 20-year war in the Central Asian country. He pointed out that all people applying to move from Afghanistan to the U.S. have to be "thoroughly vetted," and reminded viewers that the Trump administration approved Lakanwal's asylum application earlier this year.

"This gentleman came through Operation Allies Welcome, went through the airport in Kabul, arrived as a parolee on temporary status. And he, for whatever reason, he got Chief of Mission approval, which means he went through vetting then," VanDiver said. "But then he also applied for and received asylum from the Trump administration, which means he was vetted then as well. The CIA, the intelligence community, the larger intelligence community, law enforcement all vetted this guy."

"So we're not certain that that has anything to do with it. What we think is that he was just a deranged man, and the entire Afghan community shouldn't suffer for that," he added. "But look, these folks are facing really hard times, right? They're hiding in Kabul. They're in hiding all all over Afghanistan, trying to come here because of the promises that our diplomats and service members made to them. And the Trump administration shut it all down on day one."

Watch the segment below:

- YouTube www.youtube.com

DC shooting suspect may have been blackmailed into carrying out attack: report

Alleged Washington D.C. shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal may have been coerced into carrying out last week's attack on two members of the West Virginia National Guard, according to a new report.

The Daily Beast's "The Swamp" newsletter reported Tuesday that U.S. intelligence sources are investigating whether the Taliban may have blackmailed the 29 year-old Lakanwal into shooting 24 year-old Andrew Wolfe and 20 year-old Sarah Beckstrom. Wolfe remains in critical condition, while Beckstrom died from her injuries. Lakanwal was also shot during the ambush-style attack and remains hospitalized.

According to one unnamed intelligence source, Lakanwal may have felt pressured to drive across the country from his home in Bellingham, Washington to the nation's capital, if Taliban fighters gave him an ultimatum to either attack U.S. troops or have his family killed. The source noted that the threat may have been particularly effective given that Lakanwal helped the U.S. fight the Taliban during the 20-year war in Afghanistan.

"It is by no means our only line of inquiry," the Beast's source said. "People in this country have no idea about the level of stress these people are under. Most of them have families back home, and if the Taliban cannot get to them, they are making it very clear that they will go after their families."

In Afghanistan, Lakwanwal was a member of the Afghan Scorpion Forces, who worked with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as a GPS tracking specialist. Lakanwal was on one of the very last flights to the U.S. out of Kabul along with more than 120,000 other Afghan refugees, who feared retribution from the Taliban if left to fend for themselves.

The Beast further reported that the Taliban has since formed a military unit dubbed "Yarmouk 60" whose mission is to track down and kill Afghans who helped the United States. The outlet's source said that one member of the "Afghan Triples" unit that was set and funded by the United Kingdom escaped to Germany and hoped his family would follow. However, Yarmouk 60 fighters ended up killing his wife, his father and four of his children.

Lakanwal has been charged on one count of murder, two counts of assault with the intent to kill and one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. ABC News reported that he was arraigned remotely from his hospital bed in Washington D.C.

Click here to read the Beast's full report (subscription required).

King Charles victorious after call to Trump

President Donald Trump appeared to be in retreat after insulting NATO last week when he claimed it never came to the aid of the United States.

While at the World Economic Forum, Trump told Fox Business "We have never really asked anything of them. You know, they’ll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan or this or that, and they did. They stayed a little back, little off the front lines."

The Washington Post reported that King Charles III personally called Trump to school him on the only time Article V of NATO was invoked after the U.S. was attacked on Sept. 11, 2001.

Social media exploded with posts from the U.K., including Prince Harry and even the cat account for the Prime Minister's residence, about the lives lost. Harry, in particular, served as a helicopter pilot on the front lines. He wrote in a statement that he personally lost friends during the fighting that the U.K. did for the Americans in Afghanistan.

Trump backed down in his comments on Saturday by praising the U.K. forces as "among the greatest of all warriors.

“The GREAT and very BRAVE soldiers of the United Kingdom will always be with the United States of America!” Trump claimed.

The Sun reported on Sunday that King Charles' concerns were relayed to the White House. The report cited an unnamed source claiming he was "concerned" and "hurt" by Trump's comments, “whether inadvertent or not.”

The royals are slated to visit Trump in the spring as part of the U.S.'s 250th birthday celebrations.

European veterans slam 'draft-dodging moron' Trump after he claims US 'never needed' NATO

After al-Qaeda's terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) invoked Article 5 — a mutual defense agreement. The use of Article 5, post-9/11, meant that when al-Qaeda attacked the World Trade Center in New York City and the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., it was regarded as an attack on all NATO countries. And troops from other NATO members joined U.S. troops during military operations in Afghanistan.

Yet U.S. President Donald Trump is a persistent critic of NATO, claiming that it is of little or no value to the United States. And Trump, The Guardian's Jamie Grierson observes in an article published on January 23, set off outrage in European NATO countries after implying that they wouldn't help out the U.S. militarily if asked.

During an appearance on Fox Business, Trump commented, "We've never needed them. They'll say they sent some troops to Afghanistan.… and they did. They stayed a little back, a little off the frontlines."

But some of Trump's European critics are pointing out that when he was young during the 1960s and 1970s, he avoided military service.

Scotland-based journalist/author Stephen Stewart, himself a veteran, argued, "Trump's comments are as offensive as they are inaccurate. It's hugely ironic that someone who allegedly dodged the draft for the Vietnam War should make such a disgraceful statement. He has desecrated the memory of hundreds of British soldiers who made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan, people who we called friends and comrades. If he was a man of honor, he would get down on bended knees to ask forgiveness from the families of the fallen."

In a January 22 post on X, formerly Twitter, Stewart wrote, "Spitting on the graves of the fallen. This draft dodging moron has desecrated the memory of hundreds of British soldiers who died in Afghanistan. Our friends, our comrades. Vile."

In an equally scathing January 22 post on X, Ed Davey — leader of the Liberal Democratic Party in the U.K. — wrote, "Trump avoided military service 5 times. How dare he question their sacrifice. [Nigel] Farage and all the others still fawning over Trump should be ashamed."

Read The Guardian's full article at this link.

Trump admin deploys 'secretive legal weapon' against retiree for criticizing DHS

President Donald Trump's Department of Homeland Security is employing a "secretive legal weapon" to target and surveil Americans, according to a new report.

The Washington Post on Tuesday relaying the story of a retiree who found himself on the receiving end of it after speaking out against the deportation case against an Afghan asylum seeker.

"He had decided that the America he believed in would not make it if people like him didn’t speak up, so on a cool, rainy morning in the suburbs of Philadelphia, Jon, 67 and recently retired, marched up to his study and began to type," the Post's report detailed. "He had just read about the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s case against an Afghan it was trying to deport. The immigrant, identified in The Washington Post’s Oct. 30 investigation as H, had begged federal officials to reconsider, telling them the Taliban would kill him if he was returned to Afghanistan."

The retiree told the Post that he found the story "unconscionable," and after a quick Google search, he was able to find the email address of Joseph Dernbach, the lead prosecutor in H's case, named in the original story.

“Mr. Dernbach, don’t play Russian roulette with H’s life,” he wrote in an email. “Err on the side of caution. There’s a reason the US government along with many other governments don’t recognise the Taliban. Apply principles of common sense and decency.”

A little over five hours later, he received an email alert from Google notifying him that it had "received legal process from a Law Enforcement authority compelling the release of information related to your Google Account," listing the process as a subpoena and the authority as DHS. Not long after that alert, "men with badges" were at his door.

This was an example of an administrative subpoena – a tool that the federal government under Trump is increasingly leaning on — as they do not require authorizations from a judge or grand jury. "Tech experts and former agency staff" told the Post that thousands of these subpoenas are issued each year, potentially tens of thousands. They are "not subject to independent review, they can take just minutes to write up and, former staff say, officials throughout the agency, even in mid-level roles, have been given the authority to approve them."

"Though the U.S. government had been accused under previous administrations of overstepping laws and guidelines that restrict the subpoenas’ use, privacy and civil rights groups say that, under President Donald Trump, Homeland Security has weaponized the tool to strangle free speech," the report explained. "For many Americans, the anonymous ICE officer, masked and armed, represents Homeland Security’s most intimidating instrument, but the agency often targets people in a far more secretive way."

“There’s no oversight ahead of time, and there’s no ramifications for having abused it after the fact,” Jennifer Granick, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, told the outlet. “As we are increasingly in a world where unmasking critics is important to the administration, this type of legal process is ripe for that kind of abuse.”

In a post to X, Drew Harwell, a technology reporter for the Post, decried these subpoenas as "a Kafkaesque form of domestic surveillance, intimidating Americans for lawful speech."

'This is not America First': MAGA slams Trump for sending $45 million to Taliban

President Donald Trump's administration is being sharply criticized by conservatives in both government and media for reportedly sending tens of millions of dollars to the Taliban-controlled government in Afghanistan.

Newsweek reported Tuesday that, according to Amrullah Saleh, (who leads the anti-Taliban political party Afghanistan Green Trend) the Trump administration flew $45 million in cash to Afghanistan on Monday. Saleh's group alleged that the money was "flown in via a chartered flight by Moalem Airlines," which is based in Kyrgyzstan.

The post caught the attention of conservative commentator Ann Vandersteel, who said of the cash payment "this is not America First" but rather "America deceived." Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.), who is a member of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, responded to Vandersteel's post by adding that the massive cash shipments to the Taliban are happening "every week." He then called on the U.S. Senate to "pass my bill."

Burchett's legislation — the "No Tax Dollars for Terrorists Act" — passed the House of Representatives in June, and would empower the U.S. State Department to identify and publish the names of every organization providing financial support to the Taliban-controlled government.

"The United States has sent over $5 billion in cash to Kabul. It is the duty of the State Department to ensure that any aid from the United States is kept out of the hands of terrorists in Afghanistan. The terrorists can hate us for free," Burchett stated after the bill was passed.

Burchett has been a vocal proponent of cutting off U.S. cash shipments to Afghanistan ever since U.S. troops withdrew from the war-torn country in 2021. The issue has also attracted interest from MAGA influencers in close proximity to Trump, like unofficial "loyalty enforcer" Laura Loomer.

"Why is the United States still funding the Taliban?" Loomer wrote on Tuesday. "What the hell do our reps do all day aside from ruin our country and the world?"

"Because we are crooked Laura," Burchett responded.

Click here to read Newsweek's full article.

Iraq War veteran slams Trump's Venezuela operation as 'forever war 2.0'

Iraq war veteran Paul Rieckhoff told MS NOW that he is catching War on Terrorism vibes from President Donald Trump’s recent invasion of Venezuela.

When asked by MS NOW anchor Katy Tur on Thursday how young people are viewing Trump’s invasion and claim of Venezuela’s oil assets, the founder and executive director of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America said they’re expecting it "to suck.”

“They know what it's like and … they know their friends could die and come home wounded and their families will be destroyed forever,” said Rieckhoff. “This sounds like forever war 2.0. That's what we called [the War on Terrorism] after 9/11. We were in Afghanistan for 20 years.”

Rieckhoff said many of the major supporters of the invasion on social media and in press conferences have no personal skin in the game when it comes to battlefield danger.

“Everybody thinks that wars are easy and clean until they start, especially people who haven't fought them. And they're talking a lot about the return on investment and talking about what we're going to get [out of Venezuela]. Nobody's talking about what it's going to cost,” said Reickhoff. “How many American lives is it worth to get that crude oil? How many lives are we willing to give every year? Nobody's putting up their own kids. Barron Trump certainly isn't joining the military, and nobody's talking about what is actually going to happen to human beings.”

President Donald Trump, while pressing the invasion, personally avoided the Vietnam War in his youth thanks to numerous health deferments courtesy of his father and a ‘fake injury’ validated by a family doctor, according to reports.

Rieckhoff said this absence of personal danger from the president’s administration and his social media supporters indicated a whole new legion of safe, comfortable armchair warriors beating the drum for the Iraq War decades ago.

“There's a rise of a new generation of chickenhawks,” Rieckoff said. “It reminds me of 2003, 2004 and people who think war is going to be clean and easy. … [T]his is very early. I was on the ground in Iraq when people were calling it ‘mission accomplished.’ And I was still there when the insurgency rose.”

See the video below.

- YouTube youtu.be

Journalist testing recruitment hired by ICE with no background check

“They didn’t ask very many questions.” Independent journalist and U.S. military veteran Laura Jedeed recounts how she was hired as a deportation officer by Immigration and Customs Enforcement after a six-minute interview at a job fair in Texas, despite never signing any paperwork, not having completed a background check, likely failing a drug test, and publicly sharing her opposition to the Trump administration and its anti-immigrant crackdown. “It seems like the answer to the question, 'Who are they hiring?' is: They don’t know.”

This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.

AMY GOODMAN: What happens when ICE hires agents with minimal screening, then sends them into the streets masked and armed? We look now at the agency’s hiring practices as it surges agents to Minneapolis and other cities.

We begin with an independent journalist who applied for an ICE job and was offered it without even a background check. Laura Jedeed wrote about her experience in a piece published Tuesday by Slate magazine headlined “You’ve Heard About Who ICE Is Recruiting. The Truth Is Far Worse. I’m the Proof.” — was the headline.

She begins her piece, “The plan was never to become an ICE agent. The plan, when I went to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Career Expo in Texas last August, was to learn what it was like to apply to be an ICE agent. Who wouldn’t be curious?” she said.

Laura Jedeed joins us now from Portland, Oregon.

Laura, would you take it from there? Explain what exactly you did, what this fair was, and then how you applied to work for ICE, and what happened.

LAURA JEDEED: Absolutely. So, the hiring event, basically, you brought your résumé in, you handed it over. They were going to do an interview, and they were promising on-the-spot hiring, to where you could, in fact, walk out with your $50,000 bonus that day, possibly.

I went in. I handed in my résumé, which was a — I did a skills-based résumé. I’m a veteran. I served two tours in Afghanistan. So, on the surface, the résumé looked pretty good. Had a very brief interview, took all of six minutes. They didn’t ask very many questions. And then I left, assuming I would never hear back, because I’m a very googleable person. I have an unusual name. I’m the only Laura Jedeed on the internet. And I make no secret of how I feel about ICE and Trump and all of it.

So I was not expecting several days later to receive a tentative offer. I missed it in my inbox, and it sunk to the bottom, which means that I never filled out the paperwork they requested. I never accepted the tentative offer. I never filled out my background check paperwork. I never signed the affidavit saying I committed no domestic violence crimes. None of it.

A few weeks later, I got a message from Labcorp saying that ICE wanted me to do a drug test, and I went ahead and did that. I was pretty sure I wouldn’t pass. I had partaken in legal cannabis six days before the test. But why not waste some of their money, right? And then, nine days after that, I decided I wanted to — you know, I was curious. Had they processed the drug test yet?

So I logged on to the ICE hiring portal. And what I found was that not only did the drug test not seem to be relevant, I had been — I was listed as having joined ICE as of three days earlier. I had listed that I had accepted the offer. They had offered me a final position as a deportation officer. My background check was listed as completed three days in the future from when I was looking at it. So, it seems like the answer to the question, “Who are they hiring?” is: They don’t know.

AMY GOODMAN: Wow. You write in the piece, “At first glance, my résumé has enough to tantalize a recruiter for America’s Gestapo-in-waiting.” You’re likening ICE to the Gestapo?

LAURA JEDEED: Absolutely, and I don’t think that’s in any way hyperbole. We have armed, masked thugs on our street right now who are brutalizing, detaining and murdering people with apparent impunity, a carte blanche, a license to kill from our government. And they can’t even keep track of who’s behind the masks. I don’t believe for a second they’re keeping track of who’s a U.S. citizen, who needs to be deported, where these people even are. These disappearances, where people vanish into the system, is it on purpose, or are they really that sloppy with paperwork? Ultimately, it doesn’t matter. This constitutes a national emergency. We have unknown, armed thugs in masks who are terrorizing citizens.

AMY GOODMAN: So, you have served in the military. You deployed twice. Can you talk about what that experience taught you? And also, you did do an interview with an agent, and I’m wondering if you could tell us what that agent said to you and where that went.

LAURA JEDEED: Absolutely. So, I joined the military right out of high school. I really believed in the whole “war on terror” thing. I really thought we were going over to spread freedom and democracy, and what have you. And when I got there, it became very evident very quickly that that was not the case, and that we were doing very — it was a bad war, and we should not have been there —

AMY GOODMAN: Where were you?

LAURA JEDEED: — telling people what to do. I was in eastern Afghanistan for the first deployment, western Afghanistan for the second. So, I did not see combat, but as a military intelligence collector, I saw plenty of the decisions that got people killed on both sides that didn’t need to happen.

So I came back very disillusioned, like a lot of people, and actually like the ICE agent that I spoke to, which, by the way, this interview wasn’t actually part of the hiring process. It was an optional step to see if I wanted to join up. But he told me that he was — also joined right out of high school. He also deployed. And when he got back, he also got out as soon as he could. He didn’t want anything to do with the military. But he had a lot of trouble assimilating, as a lot of veterans do. And so, about six months later, he decided to go for law enforcement, and the rest is history. He’s been an ICE agent, he said, for about a decade. He likes the work. He feels like he’s getting instant results.

And this is very sad to me and also emblematic of a problem we have, where we use this language of terrorism and weapons of mass destruction and freedom and democracy at the barrel of a gun. We did this overseas, and it’s come home in every conceivable way.

AMY GOODMAN: Talk about your concerns about them not doing a background check. I mean, what does this mean for people who are documented to — well, wife beaters, people who kill women?

LAURA JEDEED: Yeah, I mean, it’s very funny that they hired a lefty journalist with a profile on AntifaWatch. That’s hilarious. But what’s not funny is they didn’t make me sign a domestic violence waiver. So, how many people with domestic violence convictions are running around with guns in our cities terrorizing people? How many people who have been committed of sex crimes or crimes against children are in charge of detention centers where there’s no oversight, where people won’t be missed and won’t be believed? The horror, it just — it boggles the mind how bad this really is.

AMY GOODMAN: And you were hired to be a deportation officer. What exactly is that? Where would you serve?

LAURA JEDEED: Yeah, so, yes, deportation officer. Basically, the agent was very keen on letting me know that I wouldn’t be given a badge and a gun right away. I wouldn’t be out in the street messing people up. I would probably have to push paperwork for about six months before I got there. And when I expressed that that was fine with me, with my analyst background, he — actually, the atmosphere changed. He was like, “No, listen, we want everyone on the street with guns eventually.” And I had to reassure him that that was also fine. It seems like the focus is very much getting people out on the street with guns, and the focus of the people applying, apparently, is to get out on the street as quickly as possible to brutalize people.

AMY GOODMAN: I’ll just end by asking you — you said you signed up to fight the war on terror, and you served twice in Afghanistan. You call what’s happening here in the United States “the war on terror come home.”

LAURA JEDEED: Yes, this is — it is very sad. It is not surprising, but it is very sad. This is a national emergency. This is a state emergency. And frankly, it’s past time that governors called up the National Guard to protect the citizens, who elected them to keep them safe from the people actually terrorizing us in the streets.

AMY GOODMAN: Laura Jedeed, I want to thank you for being with us, freelance journalist who writes regularly on her Substack at FirewalledMedia.com. We’ll link to your new piece for Slate, which is headlined “You’ve Heard About Who ICE Is Recruiting. The Truth Is Far Worse. I’m the Proof.” We’ll link to it at democracynow.org.


US Green Berets accuse Trump administration of 'reneging on promises made'

Members of the U.S. Green Berets Special Forces are pushing back against President Donald Trump's crackdown on Afghan immigrants after the recent shooting in Washington, D.C., with one chastising the move as "reneging on promises made" in a report from NBC News.

On Nov. 26, an Afghan national opened fire on National Guard members deployed to D.C. by Trump's order, killing one, Sarah Beckstrom, and critically injuring another, Andrew Wolfe. The suspect, Rahmanullah Lakanwal, was later found to have received CIA paramilitary training in Afghanistan and served in a CIA-backed militia. He first entered the U.S. after the withdrawal of military forces from his home country in 2021. Reports also indicate that he had been suffering from mental health issues in recent months and was struggling financially.

Despite the fact that the suspect's request for asylum was approved by under the Trump administration in 2025, the president has nonetheless responded to the shooting with a crackdown on Afghani immigrants in the U.S., pausing or outright halting asylum proceedings and visa processes.

In response, various Special Forces veterans who worked closely with Afghans during the U.S. militaries extended war in the country told NBC News that the president's new actions are "not fair" and said that many Afghan nationals they are in touch with are "terrified.

“It is definitely not fair to group all Afghans that helped us during our time in Afghanistan in that same basket as this individual,” Benn Hoffman, a Green Beret who served five deployments in Afghanistan, said.

“They’re fearful they’re going to be sent back to a country where we have had documented cases of our guys being killed in retribution attacks," Dave Elliott, another Green Beret and founder of the 1208 Foundation non-profit, said. "These guys didn’t want to leave Afghanistan. They left Afghanistan because the U.S. broke it and handed it back to the Taliban and they had no other choice.”

Afghans who aided U.S. forces during the war have been singled out for retribution by the Taliban, since the group took control of the Afghanistan government in 2021. Because of this, many American servicemembers have advocated for these allies to receive aid from the U.S. and asylum, to make sure they escape potential persecution.

Green Beret Thomas Kasza warned that turning our backs on Afghan allies now could also imperil future Special Forces operations overseas.

“Green Berets are built to operate with and through a host-nation partner,” Kasza explained. “If the future partner of a Special Forces detachment sees America so willing to renege on promises made, how likely is it that they will be willing to put their lives on the line to aid in advancing the interest of another nation that will readily ignore their sacrifice?”

'This is personal': George Will says Trump's Greenland push about his own 'hurt feelings'

Conservative columnist George Will is asserting that President Donald Trump's obsession with claiming Greenland for the United States was never about national security, but about the president's ego.

In a Tuesday video for the Washington Post, Will argued that the Trump administration's claims about the Danish-owned island territory should be viewed from the perspective of the president "throwing his weight around" for the sake of a "prestige infusion." And he opined that there is little reason for Trump to bully Denmark, which he called a "very close ally " due to having its own soldiers die alongside Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq.

"There's no reason to believe that there's a military necessity that the United States has that could not be negotiated with Denmark," he said. "The problem is that what this is all about isn't negotiable."

Will pointed out that Trump's Greenland rhetoric escalated after the Nobel Prize committee in Norway – which is independent of the Norwegian government — awarded the Nobel Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado instead of him. He then observed that the president effectively told the world why he was willing to risk the United States' longstanding relationship with a NATO ally over the sparsely populated island.

"Trump simply said it. He's really peeved about Greenland because he's peeved with Norway, because he's peeved about the Nobel Peace Prize not coming to him. Therefore, it's reasonable to say that this is personal and not national security," Will said. "Whereas in fact he knows that his claim to have stopped eight wars — which is his so-called claim on the Peace Prize — is beside the point.

"He's not talking about Greenland because he wants Greenland," Will continued. "But he wants Greenland because it assuages his hurt feelings."

"Obviously the best solution in Greenland is to respect the Danish government that is sovereign in Greenland, respect the measured preferences of the people in Greenland, which is to stay as they are," he added.

Europeans reach '5th stage of grief' as Trump attacks trigger historic 'power struggle'

While the issues seem to be fading from the White House's priority list, European leaders remain rattled by Donald Trump's most recent "provocations," telling Politico that they feel forced into a "violent approach" to the administration.

Much of the political conversation in the U.S. and abroad last month was dominated by Trump's renewed insistence on annexing Greenland from Denmark. His administration refused to back down on the idea despite Denmark's forceful denials, prompting major fears about the stability of the NATO alliance. Trump ultimately backed down from the idea considerably after a meeting with European officials at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, after which he claimed that a "framework" proposal for a greater U.S. presence in Greenland had been reached.

Speaking with Politico for a report published Tuesday, various "high-level European officials" said that, despite this pullback, the damage had been done to their relations with the U.S., forcing them to adopt a "change of mindset" for the foreseeable future wherein the two sides are more akin to "rivals" than "allies.' Some officials also cited continued instances of disrespect from the White House.

“We’re forced to adopt a violent approach in our relationship with the U.S. administration,” one anonymous official told the outlet. “It has completely changed from the times when there was cooperation between us, now we’re in a power struggle.”

“The message, the lack of respect for Europe, that’s been sent,” another official added in their own statement. “But they just can’t seem to help themselves from sending it again and again.”

Among these continued instances of disrespect was a recent blow-up between the U.S. Ambassador to Poland, Tom Rose, and Włodzimierz Czarzasty, speaker of the lower chamber of Poland's parliament, the Sejm. Rose said that the U.S. would cease all contact with the speaker after he publicly said that Trump did not deserve to win the Nobel Peace Prize. Rose characterized those comments as "unprovoked insults."

"Effective immediately, we will have no further dealings, contacts, or communications with Marshal of the Sejm Czarzasty whose outrageous and unprovoked insults directed against President Trump ... has made himself a serious impediment to our excellent relations with Prime Minister [Donald] Tusk and his government," Rose' wrote in a post to X. "We will not permit anyone to harm U.S.–Polish relations, nor disrespect [Trump], who has done so much for Poland and the Polish people."

In response, Polish PM Tusk wrote that, "Allies should respect each other, not lecture each other."

Trump's comments dismissing the sacrifices and service of NATO troops in Afghanistan also struck a nerve among many Europeans, as did the news that ICE agents would be on the ground in Italy doing security work during the Winter Olympics.

“Europeans are going through the 5th stage of grief,” an anonymous French diplomat told Politico. “We now understand the U.S. administration is going to be difficult for the foreseeable future.”

@2026 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.