Dave Levinthal

Revealed: Trump deep in debt while foreign money keeps coming

The finances of Republican nominee former President Donald Trump include gallons of red ink — particularly with the addition of recent legal judgments, according to a new presidential financial disclosure released Thursday.

Trump reported debts between $346 million and $455 million throughout 2023, from a legal judgments and property mortgages.

The latest disclosure shows Trump's financial liabilities from two New York court cases, in which Trump was found him liable for defamation and sexual abuse of writer E. Jean Carroll, as well as fraud via the Trump Organization.

The damages owed to Carroll are noted on the disclosure, with one liability valued over $50 million and the other valued between $1 million and $5 million. Jurors awarded her $83.3 million in damages total.

The disclosure also noted over $50 million in debt to the New York Attorney General due to litigation. In April, Trump posted a more than $175 million bond for his more than $450 million liability in the case.

All three litigation liabilities are bonded and pending appeal, according to a note on the disclosure.

Trump was also found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to a hush money payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election. His sentencing is scheduled for Sept. 18.

From Bibles to golf: Trump's assets

Trump's public financial disclosure — a requirement for all presidential candidates — was released on Thursday after certification from an attorney for the Federal Election Commission.

Trump previously twice delayed releasing his financial disclosure. He now faces Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election — someone who is likely to raise questions on the campaign trail about Trump's exotic finances and potential conflicts of interest. Trump's foreign financial entanglements, in particular, dogged him throughout his term as president.

Much of Trump's more than 250-page disclosure was dedicated to listing numerous assets and sources of income.

As federal rules only require presidential candidates to list the values of most assets in broad ranges, it's impossible to know from the document alone how much Trump is truly worth.

But his wealth — despite his debts — remains staggering.

Trump reported owning 114,750,000 shares of stock in Trump Media & Technology Group Corp., the company that owns the Truth Social platform.

Cash assets across various accounts were valued between $11.6 million and $56.4 million on the disclosure report.

Trump reported thousands of individual stock and securities assets. Investments, many in the $100,001 to $250,000 range, span a variety of companies ranging from pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, to defense contractors Qualcomm and Lockheed Martin to tech giants Apple and Alphabet, the parent company of Google.

He reported an investment cryptocurrency worth at least $1 million and another in gold bars valued between $100,001 and $250,000.

Trump also reported income from a variety of hustles, including more than $4.47 million from the "Letters to Trump" book and more than $505,000 from the "A MAGA Journey" book. Trump's stake in a Bible venture with musician Lee Greenwood netted Trump $300,000.

Trump once again earned nearly a quarter of a million dollars from an April 2024 speaking engagement for LGBTQ+ group, Log Cabin Republicans.

Curiously, Trump reported earning $35,000 from "proceeds received from the sale of helicopter parts" through DJT Aerospace LLC, one of his dozens of business entities.

Trump continues to be a union pensioner, too, taking in $90,776 from his Screen Actors Guild Pension at a monthly rate of $6,484, per his disclosure. A 2013 World Wrestling Entertainment Hall of Fame inductee, Trump also received $11,632 from his American Federation of Television and Radio Artists pension.

And although Trump's long run as the headliner on NBC's "The Apprentice" is long behind him, Trump did report receiving between $100,001 and $1 million in royalty payments from a production company, Trump Productions LLC, related to the show.

Golf remains big business for Trump, with the former president reporting golf-related income into the nine-figures, including $37.17 million in income from his club in Bedminster, N.J., and $33.54 million from his club in Jupiter, Fla. He reported more than 15.23 million in Euro income from a golf resort in Ireland and another 7.28 million in Euro income from a related hotel.

Trump made more than $7.15 million from licensing fees from NFT International Inc., a company that marketed digital Trump trading cards sold for $99 a pop.

The former president earned millions of dollars from various investments and financial arrangements in the Middle East, including the countries of Oman and the United Arab Emirates.

While Trump incessantly complains about China, he maintains numerous trademarks of his name — "Trump" — in that country, for several hundred stated purposes that include "business clothing," "toy rentals," "chemical research," "ship building," "operating lotteries," "handwriting analysis," "bookmobile services" and "lingerie."

In an indication of Trump's global business reach, the former president also maintains trademarks of his name and company names in Argentina, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bermuda, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, the European Union, Georgia, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Mexico, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Oman, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.

A "Donald J. Trump Signature Collection" trademark Trump had in Venezuela — an avowed enemy of the United States — expired on Jan. 12, 2023, Trump's disclosure indicates.

Trump University — Trump's defunct for-profit real estate education venture for which he paid a $25 million civil penalty for fraud — made a cameo in the copyright section of Trump's financial disclosure for a book Trump co-wrote.

Trump's campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to Raw Story's request for comment.

Project 2025 group makes immediate splash at Republican National Convention

For attendees of the Republican National Convention, there’s nothing remotely subtle about the role of the Heritage Foundation — the Washington, D.C.-based conservative group behind the highly contentious Project 2025 "presidential transition" plan.

Fly into Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport, and the first evidence that the GOP convention is taking place in this Wisconsin city is a set of giant signs that read: “Heritage welcomes you to the RNC Convention in MKE.”

A digital billboard inside the airport atrium flashes a similar message.

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Gonna be insanity’: Inside how Milwaukee Police will secure the Republican convention

Only after the Heritage Foundation PR bombardment will convention-goers be greeted by signs from C-SPAN, the Daily Signal and generic welcome-to-Milwaukee banners.

Go to the website advertised on the Heritage Foundation's airport signs and you're invited to watch the upcoming "Heritage’s Policy Fest" live stream — an event Monday morning and afternoon that "will unite and inspire conservatives around the promise to our country and a plan to target the moral and foundational challenges America faces in this moment of history."

The Heritage Foundation's event promises to feature "remarks from elected officials, prominent media figures, and other conservative leaders!"

While the come-on doesn't specifically mention Project 2025, the full plan is available just a click away on the website of the Heritage Foundation,

Project 2025 has become a flashpoint not only between Republicans and Democrats, but within the Republican Party itself.

Former President Donald Trump, who is expected to name his vice presidential running mate this week before formally accepting the Republican Party's 2024 presidential nomination, this week distanced himself from Project 2025, saying he he knows "nothing" about it despite former members of his administration writing it.

Project 2025 contains a litany of goals that range from mass deportations and mass federal government firings to a nationwide abortion ban and dismantling of the Education department. It also aims to empower Trump to directly control the Justice Department and the FBI.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported earlier this week that the Heritage Foundation signed on as a major sponsor of the Republican National Convention.

It's not yet known how much it donated to either the Republican National Committee's federal convention account or the separate, nonprofit Milwaukee host committee, which is responsible for much of the logistical, promotional and civic-related work surrounding the convention.

The host committee is required to disclose its financing to the Federal Election Commission two months after the Republican National Convention's completion, according to federal rules.

Revealed: Disgraced Giuliani still holds 'honorary' degrees from these five universities

Rudy Giuliani may have lost his New York state law license this week for undermining the “integrity of this country’s electoral process” and misconduct that “cannot be overstated,” a Manhattan appeals court ruled.

But at one of New York state’s most notable colleges, Giuliani’s honorary law degree from the Syracuse University College of Law is still safely in the hands of the former New York City mayor and Donald Trump lawyer — for now, the school confirmed to Raw Story.

Syracuse University spokeswoman Sarah Scalese explained that the school’s University Senate voted in March to “recommend the university revoke Rudy Giuliani’s honorary degree” and “the Chancellor referred the Senate’s recommendation to the Board of Trustees for its consideration.”

ALSO READ: NRA no longer 'human rights group' on Google

But since then, the status of Giuliani’s degree, awarded in 1989, appears to remain unchanged. Scalese did not respond to a follow-up question on whether the Syracuse University Board of Trustees, which includes notable alumni such as ESPN’s Mike Tirico,and powerful business people such as Goldman Sachs Managing Director Jeffrey M. Scruggs, has taken any action at all toward revoking Giuliani’s honorary degree.

Syracuse University is not alone in continuing to honor Giuliani.

Four other schools — Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.; The Citadel in Charleston, South Carolina; St. John Fisher University in Rochester, N.Y.; and Loyola University Maryland in Baltimore, Md. — have likewise declined to strip Giuliani of honorary degrees they awarded him in the years following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

The Citadel has been particularly strident in its defense of the honorary degree it bestowed upon Giuliani in 2007, with internal school emails and documents obtained by Raw Story last year detailing how school officials decided to close ranks, protect themselves and deflect Giuliani-related scrutiny.

Representatives from each school did not respond to phone and email requests from Raw Story inquiring about whether their schools intend to keep honoring Giuliani.

In November, The Citadel’s spokesman, Zachary Watson, declined to answer Raw Story’s questions, saying the school had nothing to say “at this time” about Giuliani’s honorary degree.

At the time, Giuliani spokesman Ted Goodman praised The Citadel for not canceling Giuliani’s honorary degree.

“The Citadel, which stresses the importance of honor, duty and respect, is a national treasure and certainly a place any young student should consider when deciding on where to pursue an education,” Goodman added.

Giuliani’s crushing troubles

Getting disbarred is just the latest indignity for Giuliani, who is beset with a host of other legal and ethical issues, as well.

Among them: 13 felony charges related to his attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Georgia, nine felony charges in Arizona related to his alleged role in a fake electors scheme, status as “co-conspirator 1” in one of former President Donald Trump’s federal indictments and the pending loss of his law license in Washington, D.C.

Giuliani has filed for bankruptcy after being ordered to pay $148 million because a civil jury found him liable for defaming two Georgia election workers.

Meanwhile, an ex-employee is accusing Giuliani of sexual assault. The IRS says Giuliani owes massive back taxes. A motley cast of detractors, ranging from his former lawyers to President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, are suing the former New York City mayor and Trump attorney over a variety of alleged misdeeds.

That’s been sufficient cause for the University of Rhode Island, Drexel University and Middlebury College to rescind honorary degrees they had once given Giuliani.

Upon Rhode Island University relieving Giuliani of his honorary degree, President Marc Parlange concluded that Giuliani had “encouraged domestic terrorist behavior.”

Giuliani aided “an insurrection against democracy itself,” Middlebury President Laurie L. Patton declared.

Drexel admonished Giuliani for “undermining the public’s faith in our democratic institutions and in the integrity of our judicial system.”

Goodman this week said Giuliani will appeal his disbarment to New York state’s highest court.

Is the NRA a 'human rights' organization? Google seems to think so

Google “National Rifle Association.”

Search returns describe the gun-rights behemoth in various ways.

“Gun rights advocacy group,” Wikipedia reads.

“An American nonprofit organization which advocates for gun rights,” writes the Library of Congress.

“The largest and most powerful gun rights organization in the United States” that “lobbies against gun control legislation and financially backs lawmakers who have historically not supported increased regulations,” USA Today reports.

None of them refer to the NRA as a “human rights” organization.

Except Google itself.

ALSO READ: Marjorie Taylor Greene buys condo in 'crime ridden hell hole'

There, prominently placed in the upper right corner of the search page, is a “knowledge panel” — a Google-generated box containing descriptive and statistical information about the NRA.

"Human rights group” is listed immediately below the NRA’s name and next to the organization’s logo.

Is this a mistake?

Raw Story asked Google.

Google spokesperson Colette Garcia declined to answer specific questions, including why Google lists the NRA as a "human rights group” and whether Google, institutionally, considers the NRA to be a "human rights group.” She also did not say whether Google has a corporate position on whether gun rights, in general, are human rights.

Instead, she emailed links to two Google primers on “knowledge panels,” including a 2020 blog item that explains how Google’s “knowledge graph” — a system that “understands facts and information about entities from materials shared across the web, as well as from open source and licensed databases” — populates knowledge panels on notable groups such as the NRA.

Google’s blog item notes that “inaccuracies in the knowledge graph can occasionally happen” and invites feedback from users who may consider something amiss.

ALSO READ: ‘They could have killed me’: Spycraft, ballots and a Trumped-up plot gone haywire

“We analyze feedback like this to understand how any actual inaccuracies got past our systems, so that we can make improvements generally across the knowledge graph overall,” Google’s blog item reads. “We also remove inaccurate facts that come to our attention for violating our policies, especially prioritizing issues relating to public interest topics such as civic, medical, scientific, and historical issues or where there’s a risk of serious and immediate harm.”

Informed by Raw Story about Google’s knowledge panel for the NRA, representatives for two gun control organizations expressed dismay.

“In no world should the NRA be listed here as a human rights group. In fact, I’d argue they are in direct competition with the work actual human rights organizations are doing to protect the lives of our children and communities,” said Kris Brown, president of Brady, a nonprofit group that advocates against gun violence. “Given the NRA is directly responsible for so many unnecessary deaths, one option might be to list them as a ‘Mass Shooter Defense Fund’ or perhaps, ‘Pro-death advocates.’”Max Steele, a spokesperson for Everytown for Gun Safety, another anti-gun violence organization, accused the NRA of playing “a leading role in building an America where gun violence kills tens of thousands of people a year and is the number one cause of death for children and teens.

Calling the NRA a “human rights” group “is enough to make North Korean propagandists blush,” Steele added.

The NRA, which says it has about 5 million members, did not respond to messages seeking comment.

The NRA self-identifies in variety of ways: “America's longest-standing civil rights organization,” “foremost defender of Second Amendment rights,” “premier firearms education organization,” “major political force,” winner of “big battles for your gun rights.”

While the NRA occasionally has argued that “self-defense is a basic human right,” such as in a statement from 2008, it does not overtly advertise itself as a human rights group.

The NRA remains a force in American politics. In May, it endorsed former President Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election, and Trump personally accepted the nomination.

“Gun owners must vote,” Trump told NRA members at the organization's annual convention in Dallas. “We want a landslide.”

But in recent years, the NRA’s political power has waned and federal lobbying expenditures have decreased as scandals rocked its leadership ranks and operations.

In February, a civil jury found the NRA and its longtime CEO, Wayne LaPierre, liable for gross financial mismanagement.

The NRA has also been accused of illegal political coordination and experienced high-profile infighting.

U.S. Surgeon General Vivak Murthy on Tuesday declared gun violence a public health emergency. He advocated for a suite of new gun laws and restrictions directly opposed to the NRA’s pro-gun agenda, including a ban on automatic rifles, universal background checks for people seeking to buy guns and tighter regulations for the gun manufacturing industry.

In the United States, deaths by firearms have risen sharply during the past decade, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data compiled by nonpartisan research organization USA Facts.

Children are among those most adversely affected, with gun deaths rising 50 percent between 2019 and 2021, the Pew Research Center reported.

The 19 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

Golden sneakers.

Nonfungible tokens.

Jingoistic Bibles.

Much ado has been made about the baubles and bibelot a cash-strapped Donald Trump keeps peddling to MAGA-heads.

But one can wear a Trump shoe, auction a Trumpy digital asset and ponder Matthew 19:24 and 1 Timothy 6:10 while reading the Lee Greenwood version of the Good Book.

The downside for Trump? All cost money to produce.

ALSO READ: 8 ways Donald Trump doesn't become president

Which is perhaps why Trump is increasingly offering prospective 2024 presidential campaign donors trinkets and honorifics with effectively no discernible value at all — in exchange for a cash contribution.

Raw Story has assembled a running list, as drawn from Trump's various fundraising emails and text messages during the past many months:

Gold card

Upside: The "NEVER SURRENDER 2024 GOLD LIMITED EDITION" card sure is shiny. It's also made of "METAL."

Downside: You may be a fool if you believe that metal is really gold. You'll also get more mileage from any credit, debit, ATM or senior discount card found in your wallet.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Platinum card

The "TRUMP 2024 BALLOT DEFENDER PLATINUM LEVEL METAL LIMITED EDITION" is advertised to a "TOP SUPPORTER" who has earned Trump's "PLATINUM RATING."

That Trump's campaign sent it to anyone subscribed to his email list, including journalists, should provide adequate evidence about its exclusiveness.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Black card

Just like the gold card and the platinum card. Except it's black.

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

Among the questions Raw Story asked Trump's team: What are the differences among these cards other than the color? Do donors receive a physical card in the mail upon making a donation or just a digital image they can print out at home? How long does it take for someone to receive a card if physical cards are offered? Is there a minimum amount one must donate to receive a card? Do the cards entitle the bearer to any benefits or perks, and if so, what?

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Life member

A "2024 Trump Life Membership" might seem like a pretty sweet deal. After all, this membership is being offered to you by a man who owns hotels and golf courses and luxury resorts.

Unfortunately, the "life membership" comes with a 100 percent guarantee that if you enter Mar-a-Lago using this as your lone credential, your visit will be brief.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Diamond Club member

If diamonds are forever, why not just get a Trump life membership and save yourself some confusion?

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Day One member

This will signify your membership to what Trump is calling the "Trump National Committee" — a joint fundraising arrangement between Trump's presidential campaign committee and the Republican National.

The only tangible benefit? A lighter wallet.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Advisory board member

Excited to support a self-styled "day one" dictator but aren't ready for a full-time gig?

Buy your way onto the "2024 Trump Advisory Board" and become a "trusted" adviser to the man who wants to become our nation's 47th president.

But rest assured that if you do, the person who Trump is pictured talking to on the phone will not be you.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

President's Trust member

A cool $35 will snag you this gig. No details whatsoever on what rights or responsibilities this will entail.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Campaign Cabinet member

Most of the members of Trump's presidential Cabinet aren't too jazzed about the former president again seeking the White House.

Enter the "OFFICIAL TRUMP CAMPAIGN CABINET."

This new Cabinet "will be made up of my most ELITE, PATRIOTIC, and TRUSTED supporters that are up for the ULTIMATE challenge – providing my team and I with valuable insight and advice as we make some of the most important decisions leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election and BEYOND," Trump writes.

What's the catch? Just donate "ANY AMOUNT IMMEDIATELY," and you, too, can start channeling your inner Wilbur Ross and begin taking lots of naps. (Trump might even say you're as "dumb as a rock.")

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

47 Club member

Oh, you think you're special because you're in the Official Trump Campaign Cabinet?

Turns out that folks in the "Official Trump 47 Club" also get invited to be among the "select few Patriots" who Trump will "rely on and will provide me with the insight and support to RECLAIM America."

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

100 Club member

Same as the 47 Club, but with a bigger number.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Gold Club member

For those who really love element No. 79 but need more than a card.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign



Platinum member

For those who really love element No. 78 but need more than a card.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Sustaining member

This membership requires a little extra.

"To be certain that we have a consistent stream of funds every single month, I'm asking you to become a Sustaining Member of our 2024 presidential campaign by making a monthly contribution of any amount ... even $1 or $5," Trump writes.

The membership does not appear to come with a public television-esque tote bag or John Tesh CD. (Sad!)

So what, exactly, does this particular membership, or any Trump these memberships, entitle one who is granted a membership?

Do different memberships come with different benefits, if they come with any benefit at all?

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Trump Donor Wall

For years now, Trump's campaign has been promising a "select" group of supporters that they would have their name etched on a "wall" in Trump's office.

Perhaps forgetting that they've run this promotion before, or perhaps hoping that supporters themselves have forgotten this fact, Trump is again promising to "build a beautiful wall at my office dedicated to a select group of donors who stepped up at this critical time."

Like another wall — say, one on the southern border — it'd be reasonable to question why the Trump Donor Wall hasn't already been built.

One thing is for certain: Mexico can't pay for the Trump Donor Wall, because foreign campaign contributions are illegal, per federal election law.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

45 ambassador

If Trump seems to be putting the "meh" in memberships, he's got something way cooler — ambassadorships!

Get ready to channel your inner Benjamin Franklin, Anthony Wayne Jerome Phillips-Spencer or Spock when you "secure your status as an Official 45 Ambassador before it's too late."

No, you will not have access to a State Department jet or even "Trump Force One."

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Golden Trump Status

So, you've already got a Trump gold card. And you're also a Trump Gold Club member.

But like Trump himself, you really, really love gold.

What's a MAGA gold digger to do?

Achieve Golden Trump Status, of course.

"Golden Trump Patriots like you WILL BE THE REASON we take back our Country from the WORST, and most CORRUPT, President in HISTORY," Trump explains in offering this opportunity.

Golden Trump Status may be achieved for the low, low pyrite-esque price of $20.24, according to a Trump campaign email.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism

Americans of a certain age may remember those grifty letters your parents would receive via U.S. mail informing them that their little Johnny or Katie had been named to the Who's Who of Upper Midwestern Left-Handed 7th Graders.

Just send a check for $99 plus shipping and handling and the publisher would send back a book where your name — misspelled, of course — would appear in four-point font on page 743, printed on paper half a micron thick.

The America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism appears to work similarly.

Even though the invitation states that Donald Trump Jr., the former president's own son, has nominated you for this "MAGA Movement Honor," there's a catch.

"$35 — DONATE THIS AMOUNT TO ACCEPT" a black button with white letters informs you when you click to accept the award.

America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism Source: Donald Trump campaign


Signed poster

One day, you're watching a football game in your wood-paneled basement rec room, and you decide the vintage, autographed posters of Bernie Kosar and Cheryl Tiegs look a bit ... dated. Time for an upgrade.

Lucky for you, a modest campaign donation will snag you a "signed poster from Donald J. Trump, the best President of all time!"

Unlucky for you, Trump's signature is simulated.

Curiously, the poster also shouts the words "NEVER SURRENDER!" across Trump's black-and-white mugshot from when Trump quite literally surrendered himself to law enforcement in Fulton County, Ga., on charges related to his alleged effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign


This article first appeared on April 11, 2024, and has been updated to reflect new Trump campaign offerings.

What Trump's weird WWE Hall of Fame speech tells us about his presidential debate strategy

Eleven years ago, Donald Trump delivered an uncharacteristically short and all-but-forgotten speech before a decidedly unfriendly crowd.

But Trump's extemporaneous address to professional wresting luminaries and fans during the 2013 WWE Hall of Fame ceremony in New York City — Trump himself was an inductee — is a curiosity worth momentarily revisiting, if only for what Trump prophesied about a pair of presidential debates to which he and President Joe Biden last week agreed.

Here are five notable foreshadowings:

Trump loves twins

“We had back-to-back WrestleManias, and it was really terrific. It was a terrific time," Trump said in his WWE Hall of Fame speech, referring to WrestleManias IV and V, which the then-World Wrestling Federation staged in Atlantic City, in a convention hall next to Trump's Trump Plaza hotel and casino. (Trump Plaza fell into disrepair during the 2010s and was imploded in 2021.)

Trump has an affinity for twin billings. He wasn't satisfied with one Atlantic City property, so he launched another. (And then another.)

They all failed.

Trump wasn't satisfied with one stint as president, either, so he's attempting to become the second former president — Grover Cleveland was the first — to win two non-consecutive terms.

ALSO READ: 8 ways Trump doesn’t become president

And Trump's second impeachment acquittal in two years helped embolden him to again run for president. "Our historic, patriotic and beautiful movement to Make America Great Again has only just begun," Trump said at the time.

So it's no surprise that Trump agreed to debates against Biden — one in June on CNN, the next in September on ABC. It's the same number — two — that the two men participated in during the 2020 presidential campaign.

It's all about the ratings

“To this day, it has the highest ratings, the highest pay-per-view, in the history of wrestling of any kind. I’m very honored by that. And perhaps that’s why I’m being inducted," Trump said of his "Battle of the Billionaires" proxy match with then-WWE CEO Vince McMahon at WrestleMania 23.

The match ended up with McMahon getting his head shaved — and Trump being slammed to the canvas by "Stone Cold" Steve Austin.

A spectacle it certainly was — one that allowed Trump to engage in a most cherished pastime: boasting about how he alone can make or break a televised event.

Since the first Trump-Biden 2024 debate is scheduled to air on CNN — and will not be broadcast on all national networks simultaneously as was standard practice for Commission on Presidential Debates-sanctioned debates — viewership could be massive.

And given that Trump has endlessly ragged "failing" CNN for its ratings, bet that Trump will use the first debate as proof — if there is proof to be had — that he alone has captured the imagination of America's body politic.

Expect Trump to play the heel

"Tough. Tough people. Thank you very much everybody," a smirking Trump said as the crowd booed him as he started his WWE speech.

"I really do love you people, even the ones that don’t like me so much," Trump said in conclusion, as a version of The O'Jay's hit song, "For the Love of Money," reverberated through the arena.

Writing for The Baffler, Mike Edison defined a wrestling "heel" as such: "The role of a heel is to get 'heat,' which means spurring the crowd to obstreperous hatred, and generally involves cheating and pretty much any other manner of socially unacceptable behavior that will get the job done."

ALSO READ: How Trump could run for president from jail

And to paraphrase the late wrestling legend Gorilla Monsoon: Trump resembles that remark.

Trump — ever the provocateur — will almost certainly avoid the high road en route to the June debate in Atlanta as he bills himself as Biden's physical and mental superior.

For example, a lectern nearly toppled over while Trump delivered a recent speech in Minnesota. Trump posted to social media: "As far as the podium, I actually stopped it from falling due to good reflexes and strength, two elements which Joe Biden does not possess."

Hype machine in overdrive

"Now, Vince has been trying for the last six years to break our pay-per-view record. He’s had some great people on. But it’s not going to happen. And the same enthusiasm and love that you have for me tonight — I feel it. That’s why you all came down to watch me get my ass kicked and my head shaved, but it didn’t happen," Trump bragged to the WWE Hall of Fame ceremony crowd, which again showered him with jeers.

Compare that to Trump's acceptance last week of Biden's debate challenge.

“I am Ready and Willing to Debate Crooked Joe at the two proposed times in June and September,” Trump posted on his Truth Social account.

"It’s time for a debate so that he can explain to the American People his highly destructive Open Border Policy, new and ridiculous EV Mandates, the allowance of Crushing Inflation, High Taxes, and his really WEAK Foreign Policy, which is allowing the World to 'Catch on Fire,'" Trump continued. "I am Ready and Willing to Debate Crooked Joe at the two proposed times in June and September."

Trump added: “I would strongly recommend more than two debates and, for excitement purposes, a very large venue, although Biden is supposedly afraid of crowds — That’s only because he doesn’t get them. Just tell me when, I’ll be there. 'Let’s get ready to Rumble!!!'”

Trump could yet pull out

"I will challenge Vince next year to a fight. And I will kick his ass. If he wants. I will kick his ass!" Trump bellowed in reference to McMahon.

Despite his bluster, Trump did not pursue another "battle of the billionaires" melee. Rather, Trump went into political business with McMahon's wife, Linda McMahon, who would later become a Trump megadonor and his administrator of the federal Small Business Administration.

Little of this is surprising — and speaks to how Trump's political career, like his pro wrestling dalliance, is peppered with backtracks, flip-flops and about-faces.

Consider that Trump has been a Democrat, independent and Reform Party member before becoming a Republican.

He used to donate money to A-list liberals before strictly supporting conservatives.

He first flirted with a run for president in 1988. Ahead of Election 2000, at the behest of former pro wrestler and Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura, Trump briefly sought the presidency as a Reform Party candidate, but quit. Trump flirted again with a run ahead of Election 2012 before withdrawing from consideration after "considerable deliberation and reflection." He even publicly pondered running for governor of New York in 2014, then didn't.

Meanwhile, Trump has been all over the map on issues such as abortion, Social Security, Medicare, gun background checks and a host of others.

And lest we forget, Trump nixed a scheduled debate between himself and Biden on Oct. 15, 2020. Trump simply refused to participate in what would have been a virtual event — the Commission on Presidential Debates made it such because Trump, who had contracted COVID-19 earlier that month at a time when vaccines weren't yet available, declined to say whether he had tested negative for the virus.

Trump refused to participate at all in any of the several 2024 Republican presidential primary debates.

Trump is now demanding Biden take a drug test before the first debate.

The takeaway?

Don't chisel the June 27 Biden-Trump debate in granite. There's still plenty of time for Trump to withdraw.

Wisconsin GOP details aftermath of $2.3 million theft

The Republican Party of Wisconsin has vowed to not get fooled again — at least not like it did in October 2020, according to a letter the party committee sent the Federal Election Commission on Friday night.

After initially losing more than $2.3 million to hackers just days before Election Day 2020, the Republican Party of Wisconsin told the FEC that it's taken "concrete steps" to better defend against fraud after falling victim to one of the nation's largest cybertheft incidents that targeted a political committee.

ALSO READ: Trump-nominated FEC leader: let political donors hide their identities

The Republican Party of Wisconsin "has revised its internal controls and compliance procedures to better defend against modern cybersecurity threats such as hacking," the committee wrote the FEC in an unsigned letter sent in response to questions from federal regulators. "For example, the RPW’s Controller now calls the recipient of each wire transfer to confirm the wiring instructions immediately prior to each wire transfer. The Controller also confirms with the recipient that they have received the funds. These concrete steps help safeguard against fraud due to altered or fraudulent invoices. In addition, the RPW requires staff to participate in cybersecurity training to keep them apprised of best practice and the latest phishing schemes."

In its letter to the FEC, the Republican Party of Wisconsin also offered new details about the incident itself: "In October of 2020, unknown individuals not affiliated with the RPW hacked the email accounts of RPW staff who had roles in the expense and payment approval process. With access to RPW staff email accounts, the hackers were able to intercept legitimate invoices, change the payment information, and email the altered, fraudulent invoices to colleagues for payment. Over the course of approximately one week (October 12-20, 2020), the hackers misappropriated a total of $2,348,963.05 from the RPW’s federal account."

The Republican Party of Wisconsin added: "The RPW completed an internal investigation and confirmed that no other fraudulent activity occurred beyond the transactions identified above. The FBI’s investigation also confirmed that outsiders perpetrated the hacking and fraud."

ALSO READ: Biden campaign surrenders tainted crypto cash

An email and voicemail left by Raw Story for the committee were not immediately returned.

The hackers had stolen the money from an account the Republican Party of Wisconsin was using to help try to reelect President Donald Trump, with Milwaukee Journal Sentinel previously reported.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel further noted that the Republican Party of Wisconsin's then-chairman, Andrew Hitt, explained in late 2020 that "hackers manipulated invoices from four vendors who were being paid for direct mail for Trump’s reelection efforts as well as for pro-Trump material such as hats to be handed out to supporters. Invoices and other documents were altered so when the party paid them, the money went to the hackers instead of the vendors."

Following an FBI investigation, the Wisconsin GOP recouped all of the lost money by mid-2022.

But that was long after the 2020 election, when Trump lost Wisconsin to now-President Joe Biden by less than one percentage point — fewer than 21,000 votes.

Thieves striking numerous politicians

During the past year, Raw Story has identified numerous federal politicians and political committees that have experienced thefts — large and small — from their campaign accounts.

Republicans and Democrats alike have been targeted. Some have recouped some or all of their lost money while others have not.

Among the most notable incidents of late:

Other high-profile politicians to lose smaller amounts from thefts of their campaign accounts include Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

In November, check fraud caused the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's political action committee to lose nearly $4,700.

Here are 17 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

Golden sneakers.

Nonfungible tokens.

Jingoistic Bibles.

Much ado has been made about the baubles and bibelot a cash-strapped Donald Trump keeps peddling to MAGA-heads.

But one can wear a Trump shoe, auction a Trumpy digital asset and ponder Matthew 19:24 and 1 Timothy 6:10 while reading the Lee Greenwood version of the Good Book.

The downside for Trump? All cost money to produce.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Which is perhaps why Trump is increasingly offering prospective 2024 presidential campaign donors trinkets and honorifics with effectively no discernible value at all — in exchange for a cash contribution.

Raw Story has assembled a running list, as drawn from Trump's various fundraising emails and text messages during the past many months:

Gold card

Upside: The "NEVER SURRENDER 2024 GOLD LIMITED EDITION" card sure is shiny. It's also made of "METAL."

Downside: You may be a fool if you believe that metal is really gold. You'll also get more mileage from any credit, debit, ATM or senior discount card found in your wallet.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Platinum card

The "TRUMP 2024 BALLOT DEFENDER PLATINUM LEVEL METAL LIMITED EDITION" is advertised to a "TOP SUPPORTER" who has earned Trump's "PLATINUM RATING."

That Trump's campaign sent it to anyone subscribed to his email list, including journalists, should provide adequate evidence about its exclusiveness.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Black card

Just like the gold card and the platinum card. Except it's black.

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

Among the questions Raw Story asked Trump's team: What are the differences among these cards other than the color? Do donors receive a physical card in the mail upon making a donation or just a digital image they can print out at home? How long does it take for someone to receive a card if physical cards are offered? Is there a minimum amount one must donate to receive a card? Do the cards entitle the bearer to any benefits or perks, and if so, what?

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Life member

A "2024 Trump Life Membership" might seem like a pretty sweet deal. After all, this membership is being offered to you by a man who owns hotels and golf courses and luxury resorts.

Unfortunately, the "life membership" comes with a 100 percent guarantee that if you enter Mar-a-Lago using this as your lone credential, your visit will be brief.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Diamond Club member

If diamonds are forever, why not just get a Trump life membership and save yourself some confusion?

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Day One member

This will signify your membership to what Trump is calling the "Trump National Committee" — a joint fundraising arrangement between Trump's presidential campaign committee and the Republican National.

The only tangible benefit? A lighter wallet.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Advisory board member

Excited to support a self-styled "day one" dictator but aren't ready for a full-time gig?

Buy your way onto the "2024 Trump Advisory Board" and become a "trusted" adviser to the man who wants to become our nation's 47th president.

But rest assured that if you do, the person who Trump is pictured talking to on the phone will not be you.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

President's Trust member

A cool $35 will snag you this gig. No details whatsoever on what rights or responsibilities this will entail.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Campaign Cabinet member

Most of the members of Trump's presidential Cabinet aren't too jazzed about the former president again seeking the White House.

Enter the "OFFICIAL TRUMP CAMPAIGN CABINET."

This new Cabinet "will be made up of my most ELITE, PATRIOTIC, and TRUSTED supporters that are up for the ULTIMATE challenge – providing my team and I with valuable insight and advice as we make some of the most important decisions leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election and BEYOND," Trump writes.

What's the catch? Just donate "ANY AMOUNT IMMEDIATELY," and you, too, can start channeling your inner Wilbur Ross and begin taking lots of naps. (Trump might even say you're as "dumb as a rock.")

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

47 Club member

Oh, you think you're special because you're in the Official Trump Campaign Cabinet?

Turns out that folks in the "Official Trump 47 Club" also get invited to be among the "select few Patriots" who Trump will "rely on and will provide me with the insight and support to RECLAIM America."

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

100 Club member

Same as the 47 Club, but with a bigger number.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Gold Club member

For those who really love element No. 79 but need more than a card.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign



Platinum member

For those who really love element No. 78 but need more than a card.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

Sustaining member

This membership requires a little extra.

"To be certain that we have a consistent stream of funds every single month, I'm asking you to become a Sustaining Member of our 2024 presidential campaign by making a monthly contribution of any amount ... even $1 or $5," Trump writes.

The membership does not appear to come with a public television-esque tote bag or John Tesh CD. (Sad!)

So what, exactly, does this particular membership, or any Trump these memberships, entitle one who is granted a membership?

Do different memberships come with different benefits, if they come with any benefit at all?

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

45 ambassador

If Trump seems to be putting the "meh" in memberships, he's got something way cooler — ambassadorships!

Get ready to channel your inner Benjamin Franklin, Anthony Wayne Jerome Phillips-Spencer or Spock when you "secure your status as an Official 45 Ambassador before it's too late."

No, you will not have access to a State Department jet or even "Trump Force One."

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign

America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism

Americans of a certain age may remember those grifty letters your parents would receive via U.S. mail informing them that their little Johnny or Katie had been named to the Who's Who of Upper Midwestern Left-Handed 7th Graders.

Just send a check for $99 plus shipping and handling and the publisher would send back a book where your name — misspelled, of course — would appear in four-point font on page 743, printed on paper half a micron thick.

The America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism appears to work similarly.

Even though the invitation states that Donald Trump Jr., the former president's own son, has nominated you for this "MAGA Movement Honor," there's a catch.

"$35 — DONATE THIS AMOUNT TO ACCEPT" a black button with white letters informs you when you click to accept the award.

America First Lifetime Achievement Award for Patriotism Source:Donald Trump campaign


Signed poster

One day, you're watching a football game in your wood-paneled basement rec room, and you decide the vintage, autographed posters of Bernie Kosar and Cheryl Tiegs look a bit ... dated. Time for an upgrade.

Lucky for you, a modest campaign donation will snag you a "signed poster from Donald J. Trump, the best President of all time!"

Unlucky for you, Trump's signature is simulated.

Curiously, the poster also shouts the words "NEVER SURRENDER!" across Trump's black-and-white mugshot from when Trump quite literally surrendered himself to law enforcement in Fulton County, Ga., on charges related to his alleged effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Donald Trump campaign fundraising message Source: Donald Trump campaign


This article first appeared on April 11, 2024, and has been updated to reflect new Trump campaign offerings.

Here are 15 worthless things Trump will give you for your money

Golden sneakers.

Nonfungible tokens.

Jingoistic Bibles.

Much ado has been made about the baubles and bibelot a cash-strapped Donald Trump keeps peddling to MAGA-heads.

But one can wear a Trump shoe, auction a Trumpy digital asset and ponder Matthew 19:24 and 1 Timothy 6:10 while reading the Lee Greenwood version of the Good Book.

The downside for Trump? All cost money to produce.

ALSO READ: 11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

Which is perhaps why Trump is increasingly offering prospective 2024 presidential campaign donors trinkets and honorifics with effectively no discernible value at all — in exchange for a cash contribution.

Raw Story has assembled a running list, as drawn from Trump's various fundraising emails and text messages during the past many months:

Gold card

Upside: The "NEVER SURRENDER 2024 GOLD LIMITED EDITION" card sure is shiny. It's also made of "METAL."

Downside: You may be a fool if you believe that metal is really gold. You'll also get more mileage from any credit, debit, ATM or senior discount card found in your wallet.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Platinum card

The "TRUMP 2024 BALLOT DEFENDER PLATINUM LEVEL METAL LIMITED EDITION" is advertised to a "TOP SUPPORTER" who has earned Trump's "PLATINUM RATING."

That Trump's campaign sent it to anyone subscribed to his email list, including journalists, should provide adequate evidence about its exclusiveness.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Black card

Just like the gold card and the platinum card. Except it's black.

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

Among the questions Raw Story asked Trump's team: What are the differences among these cards other than the color? Do donors receive a physical card in the mail upon making a donation or just a digital image they can print out at home? How long does it take for someone to receive a card if physical cards are offered? Is there a minimum amount one must donate to receive a card? Do the cards entitle the bearer to any benefits or perks, and if so, what?

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Life member

A "2024 Trump Life Membership" might seem like a pretty sweet deal. After all, this membership is being offered to you by a man who owns hotels and golf courses and luxury resorts.

Unfortunately, the "life membership" comes with a 100 percent guarantee that if you enter Mar-a-Lago using this as your lone credential, your visit will be brief.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Diamond Club member

If diamonds are forever, why not just get a Trump life membership and save yourself some confusion?

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Day One member

This will signify your membership to what Trump is calling the "Trump National Committee" — a joint fundraising arrangement between Trump's presidential campaign committee and the Republican National.

The only tangible benefit? A lighter wallet.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Advisory board member

Excited to support a self-styled "day one" dictator but aren't ready for a full-time gig?

Buy your way onto the "2024 Trump Advisory Board" and become a "trusted" adviser to the man who wants to become our nation's 47th president.

But rest assured that if you do, the person who Trump is pictured talking to on the phone will not be you.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

President's Trust member

A cool $35 will snag you this gig. No details whatsoever on what rights or responsibilities this will entail.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Campaign Cabinet member

Most of the members of Trump's presidential Cabinet aren't too jazzed about the former president again seeking the White House.

Enter the "OFFICIAL TRUMP CAMPAIGN CABINET."

This new Cabinet "will be made up of my most ELITE, PATRIOTIC, and TRUSTED supporters that are up for the ULTIMATE challenge – providing my team and I with valuable insight and advice as we make some of the most important decisions leading up to the 2024 Presidential Election and BEYOND," Trump writes.

What's the catch? Just donate "ANY AMOUNT IMMEDIATELY," and you, too, can start channeling your inner Wilbur Ross and begin taking lots of naps. (Trump might even say you're as "dumb as a rock.")

Source: Donald Trump campaign

47 Club member

Oh, you think you're special because you're in the Official Trump Campaign Cabinet?

Turns out that folks in the "Official Trump 47 Club" also get invited to be among the "select few Patriots" who Trump will "rely on and will provide me with the insight and support to RECLAIM America."

Source: Donald Trump campaign

100 Club member

Same as the 47 Club, but with a bigger number.

Platinum member

For those who love really love element No. 78 but need more than a card.

Sustaining member

This membership requires a little extra.

"To be certain that we have a consistent stream of funds every single month, I'm asking you to become a Sustaining Member of our 2024 presidential campaign by making a monthly contribution of any amount ... even $1 or $5," Trump writes.

The membership does not appear to come with a public television-esque tote bag or John Tesh CD. (Sad!)

So what, exactly, does this particular membership, or any Trump these memberships, entitle one who is granted a membership?

Do different memberships come with different benefits, if they come with any benefit at all?

The Trump campaign did not respond to Raw Story's several requests for comment.

45 ambassador

If Trump seems to be putting the "meh" in memberships, he's got something way cooler — ambassadorships!

Get ready to channel your inner Benjamin Franklin, Anthony Wayne Jerome Phillips-Spencer or Spock when you "secure your status as an Official 45 Ambassador before it's too late."

No, you will not have access to a State Department jet or even "Trump Force One."

Source: Donald Trump campaign

Signed poster

One day, you're watching a football game in your wood-paneled basement rec room, and you decide the vintage, autographed posters of Bernie Kosar and Cheryl Tiegs look a bit ... dated. Time for an upgrade.

Lucky for you, a modest campaign donation will snag you a "signed poster from Donald J. Trump, the best President of all time!"

Unlucky for you, Trump's signature is simulated.

Curiously, the poster also shouts the words "NEVER SURRENDER!" across Trump's black-and-white mugshot from when Trump quite literally surrendered himself to law enforcement in Fulton County, Ga., on charges related to his alleged effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Source: Donald Trump campaign

11 ways Trump doesn’t become president

It’s hard to imagine anything wearing down the bravado of Donald Trump, but will his legal troubles play poorly in a general election, leading him to lose again in November 2024?

Or might the current Republican front runner go out a different way?

At present, Trump stands accused of 91 charges in four felony cases, testing his political death-defying ability.

So far, the primary campaign has been a display of Trump’s political impunity, with the former president having dispatched all major challengers, except for Nikki Haley, who’s running 32 points behind him in South Carolina, her home state. That’s the next primary, on Feb. 24.

“He is a tank. He is a boulder. I don't think there is literally anything that can happen to this man that would make him lose because he has such a chokehold on the Republican Party,” said Amani Wells-Onyioha, operations director at Democratic political firm Sole Strategies.

But others still consider him vulnerable to defeat — just not exactly in the way you might think.

RELATED ARTICLE: Prison president: How Donald Trump could serve from behind bars

“There's a very real possibility that he gets convicted of one of these and is looking at prison time,” said Nicholas Creel, assistant professor of business law at Georgia College and State University. “When we get to the hypothetical point of him needing to take office, we've got to figure out now, is he actually above the law. The Supreme Court will have to step in.

“There is a very, very real possibility that a Supreme Court majority — probably a five-four ruling — could say you still have to face the music, Mr. President, and if we enter political paralysis, that's because we have chosen that you would be the president in prison,” Creel continued.

Here are 11 other scenarios where Trump fails for a second straight time to get back to the White House — without losing the 2024 general election:

Trump loses the Republican primary on votes

This is highly unlikely, but not impossible.

Elaine Kamarck of the Brookings Institution, author of “Primary Politics: Everything you need to know about how America nominates its presidential candidates,” notes that even on delegate-rich Super Tuesday, March 5, only two states (Alaska and Colorado) award delegates proportionate to the vote.

The other 13 states and a territory use a different system, which favors Trump.

“The remaining states use some sort of winner take all or winner take most system,” she wrote. “For instance, in delegate rich California, if a candidate wins 50 percent of the vote, they get all the delegates. If not, the delegates are awarded proportionally. In a two-person race Trump is likely to win many delegates.”

Then what is Haley doing?

Republican presidential candidate, former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, during a campaign event at the Franklin VFW on Jan. 22, 2024, in Franklin, New Hampshire. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

“In the months before the convention Trump may be convicted of one or more crimes,” she wrote. “It’s hard to predict how his loyal base will react. So far Trump’s indictments have only made them more loyal and there’s no reason to believe that convictions would change their minds. Nonetheless a conviction would certainly play into Haley’s critique of him as the chaos candidate. And she may be thinking she’d be the last person standing.”

Or she’s laying the groundwork for a run in 2028.

Trump loses the GOP nomination in a floor fight

Republicans are saying there’s no chance of this, according to NBC News. Morton Blackwell, a member of the Republican National Committee’s convention rules committee since 1988, said convention rules can be changed but it won’t happen — “absent a cement truck coming around the corner and killing the nominee.”

But James Long, professor of political science at the University of Washington, has said Trump supporters might have to ask themselves some tough questions amid the various indictments and Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior.

“Everyone saying they’re going to support Trump is going to have to face the reality that this is going to get worse and worse for him, and they’re going to have to think about whether or not he’s a credible winner in the (general) election,” Long said. “And they’re going to have to decide if they care more about him as a person, or they care more about winning.”

A recent CNN poll, however, showed Trump ahead of President Joe Biden by four percentage points.

Trump flees the country

As George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley wrote, Trump “is one of the most recognized figures in the world. He would have to go to Mars to live incognito. It is facially absurd.”

As outlandish as it may sound, Trump could theoretically find refuge from legal threats in a country that’s not so friendly to the United States — but potentially friendly to Trump.

Think Russia. China. Saudi Arabia. Even — dare one say it — North Korea. Unlike most people in legal peril, Trump has massive amounts of money and the physical means — specifically, his own “Trump Force One” Boeing 757 — to get to a place beyond the reach of special counsel Jack Smith, Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis or the U.S. justice system, writ large.

Trump ally Tucker Carlson, it’s worth noting, was welcomed by Russia to interview President Vladimir Putin at a time when the Russian government has for months detained two American journalists — the Wall Street Journal’s Evan Gershkovich and Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty editor Alsu Kurmasheva. News organizations and press freedom advocates have roundly condemned the detentions as unjust, with the Wall Street Journal saying that Russia has arbitrarily and wrongfully detained” Gershkovich “for doing his job as a journalist.”

And in addition to the Russias and Chinas of the world, there are dozens of other nations that don’t have extradition treaties with the United States, which makes it extremely difficult for the U.S. law enforcement officials to spirit a wanted man into custody and back to American soil.

Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) looks at then-President Donald Trump during the welcoming ceremony prior to the G20 Summit's Plenary Meeting on November 30, 2018 in Buenos Aires, Argentina. (Photo by Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images)

Of course, such a drastic move by Trump would all but guarantee that he could never again return to the United States as a free man.

But Trump has well-established business ties in numerous foreign countries and could ostensibly live like a fugitive king in a welcoming nation.

And in October 2020, days before the election he wouldn’t win, Trump himself floated the idea of becoming an ex-pat: “Could you imagine if I lose? I’m not going to feel so good. Maybe I’ll have to leave the country, I don’t know.”

Said Wells-Onyioha: “If he doesn't want to face charges, I can see him attempting to flee. Trump genuinely feels like the rules don't apply to him, so I think that there's nothing that he won't do. I don't think he wants to face any accountability or any repercussions for any of the things that he's done thus far, so I can see him trying to flee.”

In actuality, it’s much more likely that Trump’s legal team will just try to delay the court proceedings as long as possible, John Geer, dean of the college of arts and science and professor of political science and public policy and education at Vanderbilt University, has said.

“(Trump) can tie the legal system up for a long time, so that’s what I suspect he'll end up doing,” Geer said.

ALSO READ: Bikers for Trump just hit a ditch

Last month, Trump was hit with an $83.3 million verdict by a jury that found Trump liable for defaming a woman — for a second time — about what a previous jury determined was sexual assault.

Trump faces a potentially much larger verdict for what a judge has ruled was fraud involving his business interests in New York. The judge has delayed a verdict on damages after a report that a Trump finance executive planned to plead guilty to perjury.

Trump is scheduled to go on trial March 25 in New York on charges that he falsified financial records to hide payments — prior to being elected President in 2016 — to porn performer Stormy Daniels for staying quiet about an alleged affair.

A March 4 trial date on federal election subversion charges against Trump was delayed for courts to consider Trump’s claim of presidential immunity. A federal appeals court unanimously found no such privilege. The next step is the Supreme Court, which could choose not to take the case and let the appeals court ruling stand.

The start date is uncertain for Trump’s federal trial on charges of illegally retaining classified documents after he left the White House. The judge set a trial date for May but has suggested she might move that back as Trump’s lawyers say they need more time to review “voluminous” evidence.

A Georgia election interference case against Trump is delayed by allegations that the Fulton County District Attorney had a relationship that created a conflict of interest. A hearing is scheduled Feb. 15 on Trump’s motion to dismiss the case over the relationship and alleged financial improprieties.

Trump falls gravely ill or dies of natural causes

When Americans discuss age and the presidency, it’s usually about President Joe Biden, the nation’s first octogenarian commander-in-chief who will be 82 years old on Inauguration Day 2025.

But Trump, 77, is not a young man, either.

Trump turns 78 in June. If elected president this year, Trump would become the oldest president in history at the time he took office, surpassing Biden.

The average age of death for a man who’s served as president of the United States is about 72 years old, according to Statista, and only 12 out of the 45 U.S. presidents have lived to celebrate their 80th birthday.

So while the topic itself is grim, even uncouth, the odds of Trump falling gravely ill or dying before Election Day 2024 are not insignificant.

ALSO READ: Alina Habba is persona non grata at her Pennsylvania law school

What would happen next upon either scenario would largely be a function of the point in time Trump stopped running.

Kamarck has written that state election officials are allowed to adjust filing deadlines for new candidates if the frontrunner dies or is incapacitated. For some of the states that haven’t yet conducted their nominating contests, they could also move back their primaries.

If Trump couldn’t continue after winning enough primary votes to become the presumptive 2024 presidential nominee, the nation would almost certainly gird for a brokered Republican National Convention, which is scheduled for mid-July in Milwaukee, Wis.

And if Trump officially secured the GOP nomination, but couldn’t stand for election in November 2024, a select group of Republican Party bigwigs would likely convene to choose a replacement — whether that was Trump’s vice presidential running mate, or someone else.

Trump dies from assassination

Even more grim is the specter of assassination, an ever-present specter for presidents and presidential candidates alike.

Four presidents — John F. Kennedy, William McKinley, James Garfield and Abraham Lincoln — died after being shot.

Ronald Reagan, in 1981, could have been the fifth assassinated president but for the quick reactions of law enforcement and medical personnel.

Last August, while attempting to serve a warrant, FBI agents shot and killed a Utah man who had allegedly made “credible” threats against Biden.

High-profile presidential candidates also come under threat. The most notable modern example is that of Robert F. Kennedy, who died in 1968 after being shot at a campaign event. (Kennedy’s son, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is now running for president as an independent, and he has publicly stated that he believes his father’s convicted killer isn’t the man who committed the crime.)

Trump, like every past president and many presidential candidates, receives U.S. Secret Service protection and will ostensibly be entitled to such protection even if he’s convicted of a crime and sent to prison or home detention.

Trump agrees to quit the race before Election Day

Scott Galloway made this prediction on the popular podcast Pivot, which he hosts with journalist Kara Swisher:

Trump, Galloway said last year, "has a very nice life, and his life can be going back to golf and sycophants and having sex with porn stars. … Or he can live under the threat of prison. The [political] momentum he has is real leverage and power. And I think he’s going to cash that leverage and power in for a plea deal that includes no jail time.”

With Trump is facing state charges in Georgia and New York, he wouldn’t be able to escape by pardoning himself as president — something he could attempt to do for the federal-level charges he faces. Therefore, Trump’s calculus may change.

Creel noted Spiro Agnew’s resignation from the vice presidency in 1973 after facing the threat of jail for his corruption while governor of Maryland.

“One of the parts of the agreement was [to] resign, get out of politics forever, and we will not pursue this,” he said. “So with a more rational defendant, that would absolutely be something that's on the table. That's something Jack Smith would be bringing to Trump, but for one, we're not dealing with a particularly rational individual. Two, this scenario is significantly different in that we have state-level charges also facing him. And so because they can't really immunize him against that at the state level, the incentive to take that sort of a deal is greatly diminished.”

Wells-Onyioha said Trump maybe – maybe – would come to the realization that prison, and the potential life-long loss of his freedom, is a real and unpalatable possibility.

“I can see them coming up with some sort of like plea agreement, where in exchange for dropping out of the race, they will let him be on probation or something like that,” she said. “I can see that happening. But even so, I'm not even sure if he would take that deal.”

Trump is removed via the 25th Amendment

The Constitution’s 25th Amendment spells out the succession plan if a president dies or is removed from office, which means the vice president takes over.

If the vice president and his cabinet determine that the president is unable to discharge his duties as president — say, being in prison — Congress will have 48 hours to convene and 21 days to decide if the president is fit to hold office. It can remove him by a two-thirds vote.

“You can even see his cabinet exercising the 25th Amendment, saying, look, you're incapacitated. You're not capable because you're needing to go to prison or are in prison. You're not capable of fulfilling the oath of office, therefore, we're invoking [the] 25th Amendment and removing you from office that way, and so you would see whoever his vice president elect is [at] that point stepping up,” Creel said.

If Trump wins the 2024 election, the Supreme Court will ultimately need to decide if a sitting president is immune from state-level prosecution in Georgia and New York, and the Court might rule against his ability to serve as president.

Supreme Court 2022, Image via Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

“Functionally this would mean Trump is the legitimate president but would still be forced to carry out a sentence in a state prison,” Creel said. “In that scenario, it’s difficult to see how he wouldn’t be either impeached and convicted or otherwise removed via the 25th Amendment due to his ‘incapacity.’”

But with a third of the Supreme Court being Trump appointees, Svante Myrick, president of People For the American Way and former mayor of Ithaca, N.Y., said he could see the Court ruling in Trump’s favor and allowing him to serve any legal consequences at a later time.

“Uncharted legal territory with stakes this high means questions like that usually get kicked up to the Supreme Court. Given that, Donald Trump appointed three members of the Supreme Court on a six-person ultra conservative majority, I think the most likely scenario is that he's allowed to stand for office, and if he wins, he could avoid or at least delay paying his debt to society,” Myrick said.

The 25th Amendment could also be used for a president’s mental competence. While Trump attacks Biden for being “cognitively impaired,” Trump is 77 years old and isn’t always sharp himself. He said last year Biden would lead the U.S. into “World War II” and, in the same speech, said he was leading former President Barack Obama in polls for the 2024 election.

Amid Trump’s continued gaffes this year, Haley has called him “confused” and has tried to use the issue to bait him into appearing with her in a debate.

Trump has the 14th Amendment applied to him

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Feb. 8 on whether the Constitution’s 14th Amendment and its “insurrectionist ban” makes Trump disqualified from holding office because of his actions on Jan. 6, 2021.

Colorado’s Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in December that the ban does apply to Trump.

Maine’s secretary of state came to the same conclusion, but a court has ordered that the issue be reconsidered after the U.S. Supreme Court decision.

Some other states rejected legal intervention on procedural grounds.

The 14th Amendment, in part, bans anyone who “engaged in insurrection” against the United States from holding any civil, military or elected office without the approval of two-thirds of the House and Senate.

“Donald Trump cannot be president — cannot run for president, cannot become president, cannot hold office — unless two-thirds of Congress decides to grant him amnesty for his conduct on Jan. 6,” William Baude, a professor of law at the University of Chicago, has said.

The 14th Amendment originally intended to prevent Confederate officials from gaining power after the Civil War, but how the disqualification clause would be applied is unclear to legal experts, especially since it’s never been used in the case of a president before, FindLaw, a Reuters company, reported.

Trump is impeached for a third time, then convicted and disqualified from serving as president

If the Supreme Court does say “nobody's above the law, and that includes the president” and lets the criminal justice system do its work, Creel said, Trump could still be disqualified from the presidency via the political system.

“We have a blueprint for how to do that. Impeachment. Conviction. Removal. That's how you could do it, and so you can see him taking office and having that avenue, where he's president for a day and then they just kind of have this perfunctory removal,” Creel said.

Trump was twice impeached while in office, but was acquitted on all counts by the Senate in both cases.

Then-President Donald Trump holds a copy of The Washington Post as he speaks in the East Room of the White House one day after the U.S. Senate acquitted on two articles of impeachment, ion February 6, 2020 in Washington. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Congress could technically impeach Trump now with the goal of simply disqualifying him from running for elected office. Recall that Trump’s second impeachment trial took place several weeks after he left the White House.

But with Republicans currently controlling the House, where any impeachment proceeding would begin, such a scenario is exceedingly remote.

Trump accepts pardon promise with the understanding that he’ll quit the race

An exotic and unlikely scenario is Biden pardoning Trump with the understanding that Trump will quit the presidential race.

Biden, who has recently stepped up his criticism of Trump, has never spoken of such an idea.

A most imperfect historical parallel would be President Gerald Ford’s pardoning of President Richard Nixon after Nixon resigned amid the Watergate scandal. But there’s no evidence Ford’s pardon involved either an overt or secret quid pro quo, according to the National Constitution Center, and came only after Nixon had officially stepped down.

Also: Could Trump serve as president while set to serve time?

In short: yes.

There’s precedent that presidents don’t have full legal immunity — look at the 1997 Supreme Court ruling in Clinton v. Jones, Creel says — but Trump could be still allowed to serve any prison time post-presidency if convicted and sentenced for any of the 91 charges.

That would require the Supreme Court ruling that Trump couldn’t have his presidential duties interfered with by state level charges.

“We have to just set them aside to the point where he could realistically, in that scenario if that's what the Supreme Court says, be told January 20, at 12:01 p.m., 2028, report for incarceration in the state of Georgia,” Creel said. “That's an actual realistic possibility that could go his way.”

Senators extend their streak of never punishing other senators

WASHINGTON — Arguably the most bipartisan – nonpartisan, really – committee in the Senate is also, arguably, the biggest laughing stock on Capitol Hill.

And matters just got worse: The secretive U.S. Senate Select Committee on Ethics has extended one of the most ignoble streaks on Capitol Hill.

For at least 17 years and running, the Senate Ethics Committee — tasked with confidentially investigating allegations of misconduct by the chamber’s austere members and staffers — has failed to formally punish anyone at all, a Raw Story analysis of congressional records indicates.

That amounts to 1,668 complaints alleging violations of Senate rules with exactly zero resulting in disciplinary action.

In 2023 alone, the Senate Ethics Committee on Wednesday disclosed accepting 145 separate reports of alleged ethics violations. Of them, 19 merited preliminary inquiries by committee staff. Of those, the committee dismissed 12 for “a lack of substantial merit” or because they deemed a violation to be “inadvertent, technical or otherwise of a de minimis nature.”

None resulted in a “disciplinary sanction.”

And senators seem to know it.

“Maybe it's the equivalent of a warning ticket when you're speeding, like the police,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) – the former number two Republican, or whip, in the Senate – told Raw Story through a laugh this week.

The senators who make up the secretive six-member ethics panel will neither confirm nor deny their work.

“We don’t – I don’t discuss that,” Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE) told Raw Story.

Fischer’s far from alone, with Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Chris Coons (D-DE) previously declining to comment to Raw Story about the committee’s work.

Senate ethics vs. House ethics

While members of the Senate Ethics Committee refuse to discuss their work — and lack thereof — some members of the House Ethics Committee are aghast at what their senatorial counterparts aren’t doing.

"What's the point of having ethics rules if there's no teeth?" Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-TX) – a member of the House Ethics Committee – told Raw Story.

“Without accountability, we're not going to have compliance,” Escobar said. “If you expect people to abide by ethics rules, there has to be trust in the process and trust that the outcome is fair. But if there's no outcome, then there’s no faith in the system and people will operate with impunity, because there’s no consequences.”

Historically, at least, it would be laughable to look to the House Ethics Committee as a beacon of efficiency — or anything. But in recent months, the committee has changed.

Case in point: Now former-Rep. George Santos (R-NY), who allegedly lied himself both into and out of office.

George Santos yelling at reporters (C-SPAN).

Before Santos was expelled in December, he survived expulsion votes in May and then November.

But some two weeks later, on November 16, the House Ethics Committee spoke in one loud and bipartisan voice when they dropped their damning 55-page report that pulled the veil back on the web of lies, greed and corruption they alleged surrounds Santos most anywhere he goes.

The committee interviewed 40 witnesses — after issuing 37 convincing congressional subpoenas — while also thumbing through upwards of 170,000 pages of records, as new nonprofit newsroom NOTUS pointed out in its helpful historical primer on Senate ethics inaction, which built on a 2023 Raw Story investigation.

By the time the House took up its third Santos expulsion measure on Dec. 1, 2023, the tides had turned even in the full House of Representatives, where Republicans were holding on to a razor thin 222-213 seat majority. While all five GOP leaders in the House voted against expulsion, rank-and-file Republicans voted to oust their camera-loving colleague.

ALSO READ: We asked 15 U.S. senators: Blood on Big Tech’s hands or on your hands?

“That was a tough vote for them given the margins that were so small,” Rep. Glenn Ivey (D-MD) – another member of the House Ethics Committee – told Raw Story. “Democrats too, because, I think, there were two votes before but he wasn’t expelled. When the report came out, I think, people were able to look at the body of evidence,”

In the end, based on the ethics report, 73% of the House voted to expel only the sixth member in the storied history of the rowdy chamber.

"At the end of the day, to me, what it did was, it allowed for due process," Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) told Raw Story. “It allowed for due process for him, but it gave us the ability to move ahead with the expulsion.”

Lawler and other New York Republicans led earlier efforts to oust Santos — in part because his constituent’s were calling their offices for assistance — and he says the Ethics Committee report was the gamechanger.

“A lot of people felt that they had enough due process and information,” Lawler said.

The nation’s founders wanted the two separate branches of the legislative branch to police themselves. That’s about it. In the Constitution, the details of said policing were left to be written by future generations of lawmakers themselves.

"Each House [of Congress] may determine the Rules of its proceedings, punish its members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds, expel a member," according to the Article I, section 5 of the Constitution.

Historic Senate inaction

The House and the Senate are different. And that extends to ethics, too.

In its 235-year history, the U.S. Senate has expelled 15 members. The first came in 1797 — less than a decade since the chamber’s inception — when Sen. William Blount (R-TN), a founding father who signed the original Constitution before being expelled by a vote of 25 to 1 for committing treason.

The other 14 expulsions came in 1861 and ‘62 when roughly 20 percent of senators were expelled after they joined the Confederate rebellion against the United States of America.

But during the ensuing 162 years, the so-called “ world’s greatest deliberative body” has, when it comes to ethical matters, done a lot of … deliberating.

U.S. senators have been caught running fraudulent campaigns, receiving kicks back for leasing out federal government property, embezzling money (before being laid to rest in the Congressional Cemetery), charging U.S. citizens to perform their senatorial duties and taking bribes in exchange for war contracts. Senators have been nabbed in FBI stings before being sent to prison.

All of those cases of historic corruption came before the Senate Ethics Committee. Some of those inquiries seem to have scared some senators into resigning early, but not one elicited an expulsion vote. Most senators emerged from these and other tribulations without even receiving a formal punishment.

While Santos was the gadfly of the House, there’s still a senior senator buzzing about that even some members of his own party say should be expelled.

In September, responding to numerous requests for information about freshly indicted Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ), the Senate Ethics Committee released a rare statement.

In essence: The Senate Ethics Committee said it wasn’t going to say anything, and that it would let criminal investigators take the lead.

ALSO READ: Sen. Josh Hawley is praying for your money

“[T]he Senate Select Committee on Ethics does not comment on matters pending before the Committee or matters that may come before the Committee. Also, absent special circumstances, it has been the long-standing policy of the Committee to yield investigation into matters where there is an active and ongoing criminal investigation or proceeding so as not to interfere in that process.”

The closest the Senate Committee on Ethics got to formally reprimanding one of its own during 2023 came on March 23, when it issued a “ public letter of admonition” to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for soliciting campaign contributions in a federal building.

Specifically, Graham in November 2022 asked the public, via Fox News, to contribute money to the U.S. Senate campaign of Republican Herschel Walker, who ended up losing his midterm race to incumbent Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock.


In admonishing Graham, the Senate Committee on Ethics noted that Graham had previously violated the prohibition on soliciting campaign donations in federal buildings when he raised money for his own campaign in 2020.

But for all that, Graham’s letter isn’t much more than ink, paper and embarrassment.

Such letters “shall not be considered discipline,” according to the Senate Committee on Ethics’ Rules of Procedure, and they fall well short of actual acts of internal discipline such as censure, denouncement, condemnation, restitution payments or — in the most extreme of cases — expulsion.

The last time the U.S. Senate formally disciplined a senator?

That came on July 25, 1990, when the Senate voted 96-0 to denounce Sen. Dave Durenberger (R-MN) for “unethical conduct in personal business dealings, Senate reimbursements and using campaign contributions for personal use.”

“I commend the members of the Ethics Committee for their commitment and their dedication to the most difficult task in this place,” Durenberger told his colleagues from the Senate floor following the vote.

Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), currently the Senate’s youngest member, was three years old at the time.

‘Different set of rules’

Senators maintain the two chamber’s ethical standards are on different planes. They say it’s like comparing apples to, well, the House of Representatives.

For starters, the House doesn’t allow outside parties to initiate ethics complaints, while the Senate does, argues Cornyn of Texas.

“So just a different set of rules,” Cornyn said.

Cornyn loves throwing the book at the deserving, he maintains. Before coming to Congress, he served as an associate justice of the Texas Supreme Court. He also served as the Lone Star State’s attorney general under then-Govs. George W. Bush and Rick Perry.

The Senate Ethics Committee isn’t just about crime — of which there’s been a lot of on Capitol Hill — it also acts as a guide to senators, Cornyn said.

“To keep us ethical, hopefully,” Cornyn said. “Hopefully to provide guidance, so that people don't get in trouble in the first place. That's, I think, one of the roles.”

Raw Story asked Cornyn what its like serving with Menendez, noting that the allegations against him — fraud, conspiracy to commit bribery, conspiracy to commit extortion — are quite serious.

“I’m a believer that there's a presumption of innocence until proven guilty, so we'll wait and see how that process plays out,” Cornyn said. “I'm sure it's a miserable experience.”

Misery loves company. And, unlike Santos, who’s busy photobombing Trump victory parties, Menendez remains in office and has lots of Senate colleagues keeping him relatively warm these days.

Trump's 'official' calendar is missing a critical detail

A “2024 Official Calendar” published by Donald Trump Jr. comes replete with “Incredible photographs from President Donald J. Trump's time in the White House.”

Trump-y historical facts accompany many of the dates.

You’ll learn, for example, that Trump signed Executive Order 13767 on Jan. 25, 2017 — “beginning construction of the Southern Border Wall.”

You’ll be reminded that Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court on Jan. 31, 2017.

But one date on the Trump calendar — available for $14.99 plus $4 shipping — is conspicuously missing any such detail.

January 6.

That calendar square sits blank, according to a sample page reviewed by Raw Story. Trump himself, as his supporters rampaged through the U.S. Capitol on that date in 2021, urged them on Twitter to “remember this day forever.”

Historic by any measure, the date Jan. 6 now lives in national infamy alongside Dec. 7 — the bombing of Pearl Harbor in 1941 — and Sept. 11.

ALSO READ: Five unresolved questions surrounding the Jan. 6 attack

On Jan. 6, 2021, Trump conducted a campaign-style rally immediately south of the White House and whipped tens of thousands of his supporters into a frenzy. Thousands immediately left the rally and marched on the U.S. Capitol, where they broke through police lines and attempted to stop Congress from certifying the 2020 presidential electoral vote, which now-President Joe Biden won.

Five people died and dozens were injured. More than 1,200 people have been charged with crimes associated with the attack.

And Trump enters the 2024 presidential election year as the hands-down favorite to win the Republican Party’s presidential nomination — all while facing 91 felony charges across four criminal cases, including conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to commit election fraud, among other alleged crimes related to his effort to overturn the last election.

The calendar’s sanitation of Jan. 6 history is the handiwork of Winning Team Publishing — co-founded by Donald Trump Jr.

A sales page for Winning Team Publishing, co-founded by Donald Trump Jr., which offers a Donald Trump-themed "official calendar" for $14.99 plus shipping. The calendar does not include historical details about January 6, unlike what it offers for other dates. Source: Winning Team Publishing

Describing itself as “the nation’s premier conservative publishing house,” Winning Team Publishing serves as an unofficial campaign merch store of sorts for the true Trump fan, with offerings that include the coffee-table books Letters to Trump and Our Journey Together, along with Don Jr.’s book Liberal Privilege and an “iconic and limited edition Trump hat.”

Don Jr., the president’s eldest son, is also executive vice president of the Trump Organization, which is in the midst of a New York civil fraud trial that could result in a penalty of up to $250 million.

Trump’s own presidential campaign, meanwhile, also has a new calendar.

For a donation of $47, the Trump campaign is offering supporters its own “official” Trump calendar.

A campaign email peddling the campaign calendar email combines Trump’s marketing genius with his business organization’s dubious accounting practices by promising that “any patriot who contributes $47” will receive the calendar for “free!”

Donald Trump's presidential campaign is also selling a calendar — this one is available to people who make a $47 campaign donation. Source: DonaldTrump.com

Sample images of the campaign calendar provided within the email show blank date squares, with no commentary for any date. It’s unclear whether the actual calendar provides commentary for holidays, Trump milestones or, for that matter, Jan. 6, 2024 — the third anniversary of the Capitol attack.

Neither the campaign nor the publisher responded to emails from Raw Story seeking an explanation for why the calendar writes Jan. 6 out of the history of the United States’ 45th president.

Busted: Tommy Tuberville invested in defense contractor while blocking military nominations

WASHINGTON — Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) recently purchased up to $250,000 worth of stock in telecommunications technology company Qualcomm Inc., a federal defense contractor, while serving on the U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services and actively blocking hundreds of military nominations and promotions, new congressional financial disclosures indicate.

Qualcomm and its subsidiaries have been the recipient of several dozen defense and homeland security contracts during the past two decades, according to federal contracting records reviewed by Raw Story.

Among these is a Department of the Army contract with Qualcomm Intelligent Solutions, worth nearly $11.7 million with the possibility of growing to $30.4 million, related to a government program exploring "innovative, energy-efficient, and reliable computer architectures that can address the intelligence community’s large-scale data-analytic applications."

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

The Senate Armed Services Committee on which Tuberville sits has jurisdiction over "military research and development," among a host of other responsibilities.

Tuberville spokesman Steven Stafford did not reply to a question about whether it's a conflict of interest for Tuberville to invest in defense contractor stocks while serving on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

He also did not respond to a question about whether Tuberville, in principle, supports or opposes any of the several bills introduced this year that would either ban, or limit, members of Congress and their spouses from personally trading stocks. Tuberville has previously described the idea as "ridiculous".

"Senator Tuberville has long had financial advisers who actively manage his portfolio without his day-to-day involvement," Stafford wrote in an email to Raw Story.

Asked to name the financial advisers, he did not respond.

ALSO READ: A deafening silence from Sen. Tommy Tuberville’s Black football players

Tuberville's Qualcomm stock purchase is not the first time the senator has bought or sold defense contractor stocks since joining the U.S. Senate in 2021.

Earlier this year, he separately bought and sold hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of Qualcomm shares. Tuberville also has five-figure stock holdings in defense contractors Honeywell International and Lockheed Martin Corp., according to his most recent annual personal financial disclosure.

More recently, Tuberville has made headlines for blocking the nominations or promotions of hundreds of senior members of the U.S. military in protest of a government policy that provides funding for servicemembers and their dependent children who cross state lines to obtain abortions.

'Ethically preposterous'

A government ethics watchdog took a dim view of the latest stock trade by Tuberville, whose months-long blockade of nominations and promotions for high-level military officers stems from his objection to a Biden administration policy that allows military personnel to charge the government for travel related to obtaining an abortion.

"Senator Tuberville being a member of the Armed Services Committee and investing in defense contractors is ethically preposterous and a textbook example of a conflict of interest," Dylan Hedtler-Gaudette, senior government affairs manager with the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan group that exposes conflicts of interest in the government, told Raw Story.

"The senator’s personal financial position is directly tied to the financial position of specific companies that receive billions of dollars in taxpayer funded government contracts," Hedtler-Gaudette said. "I can’t think of anything more inappropriate and unethical than that, especially given the role that the Armed Services Committee plays in authorizing defense spending toplines and priorities around specific defense projects and programs."

Tuberville's personal investments have proved problematic for him in other regards.

In 2021, Insider reported that Tuberville violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act of 2012 by failing to properly disclose more than 130 stock trades that, taken together, were worth as much as $3.56 million.

Since then, dozens of other federal lawmakers have similarly violated the STOCK Act with late or otherwise incomplete disclosures.

During 2023 alone, Raw Story has identified 23 members of Congress — Republicans and Democrats alike — who've violated the law.

Trump is embracing five ‘fake news’ outlets he supposedly hates

WASHINGTON — Each afternoon since last week, former President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign has fired off an email titled "ICYMI: Important Articles and Posts from President Trump".

Most of these missives contain predictably Trumpian fare from decidedly far-right outlets peddling MAGA propaganda and culture war outrage.

“Trump is the greatest defender of the Constitution alive today,” declares the headline of a column from the Washington Times’ Charles Hurt.

“Energy sector sees 88% increase in ‘nonbinary’ workers from last year,” reads one story from John Solomon’s Just the News.

Many other Trump touts paint President Joe Biden with the gloomiest shade of drab, alternately asserting he’s cowardly, corrupt, weak, lazy and losing the support of Black voters.

But Trump’s daily brag sheets are also peppered with articles from news organizations that — taking Trump at his own word — are straight-up terrible, filled with lying, no-good agents of “fake news” who are hell-bent on harming him.

Among them is “disgusting,” “bad,” “totally biased” and “truly unprofessional” NBC News, which Trump in March called “one of the worst” as he ordered reporter Vaughn Hillyard off his private Boeing 757 jet following a campaign rally in Waco, Texas.

On Wednesday, Trump used his daily email to highlight the reporting of NBC News’ Monica Alba and Carol E. Lee, who wrote that “attorneys for President Joe Biden and the special counsel appointed to investigate his handling of classified documents have been negotiating for about a month over the terms under which he would be interviewed.”

In 2020, Trump issued a blanket Twitter declaration that “WSJ is Fake News!” after the Wall Street Journal chided the then-president for the quality of his daily White House press briefings.

But Trump’s Sept. 3 email news round-up led with a story from the Wall Street Journal reporters Aaron Zitner and John McCormick, headlined: “Trump Is Top Choice for Nearly 60% of GOP Voters, WSJ Poll Shows

Even the ultimate “enemy of the people” — the “failing,” “inaccurate,” “corrupt,” “sick,” "discredited” and “totally dishonest” New York Times — earned not one, but two slots in Trump’s sizzle reel.

The top of a daily "Important Articles and Posts from President Trump" email that Donald Trump's 2024 campaign began sending out last week. Screengrab

One was a nearly 23-year-old New York Times story about a plan in Florida to appoint George W. Bush electors “with no Jeb Bush signature” — a not-so-subtle tie-in to Trump’s own 2020 fake elector scheme that has landed him and many of his associates in vat of legal magma.

The other, in Trump’s Sept. 6 email, is a piece from 2015 by Michael Barbaro about a 1987 letter to Trump from former President Richard Nixon. In it, Nixon says that his wife, Pat Nixon, saw Trump on the Donohue show and finished the program convinced that “whenever you decide to run for office you will be a winner!”

The “ultra liberal” and “failing” Des Moines Register and perennial “total joke” frenemy Fox News — “Fox has become fake news, too,” Trump said in 2020 — also got Trump email shout-outs in recent days.

So, has Trump, who is facing 91 felony counts across four separate criminal cases while maintaining a commanding lead for the 2024 Republican nomination, warmed to the coverage of his sworn media enemies?

The Trump campaign didn’t directly answer Raw Story questions about whether Trump still considers the New York Times, NBC and the rest to be "fake news". Nor did it explain why the campaign decided to highlight news articles from outlets Trump had previously deemed untrustworthy.

But in an email to Raw Story, Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung wrote: “When Fake News is forced to print the truth, you know it's dire for Crooked Joe Biden.”

For Kathy Kiely, the Lee Hills chair in free-press studies at the University of Missouri's Missouri School of Journalism, Trump’s desire to have it both ways is a potential teaching moment. She challenged Trump supporters to think critically about when Trump cites mainstream news organizations to his advantage.

“Look at the record. Are they really fake if Donald Trump quotes these outlets?” Kiely said, while acknowledging that Trump’s “contradictions and hypocrisies don’t seem to bother his most hardcore supporters.”

Trump’s hypocrisy is, at least, transparent, Kiely added.

“He bludgeons the media when it’s convenient. He uses the media when it’s convenient. He’s happy to cite the media organizations he hates when they publish something that is helpful to him,” she said.

True to form, Trump’s email on Thursday featured the republication of an Associated Press story about conservative Christians’ attraction to Trump.

The article to which Trump linked appeared in the Milwaukee Independent, a small, nonprofit news organization in Wisconsin that features this quotation in its “about us” page: “As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others.”

The quote is from Marianne Williamson, who is also running for president in 2024 — as a Democrat.

'Protect them': How SC’s honor-bound military college camouflaged its connection to Rudy Giuliani

The Honor Code of The Citadel, South Carolina’s 181-year-old military college, states that cadets “will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those who do.”

But The Citadel now finds itself quietly tolerating one of its most recognizable honorary degree recipients — Rudy Giuliani — who, in the estimation of the U.S. House’s January 6 select committee, lied and cheated while attempting to steal the 2020 presidential election away from its duly elected winner, Joe Biden.

“Mr. Giuliani’s effort to undermine the integrity of the 2020 presidential election has helped destabilize our democracy,” a DC Bar Association panel wrote last month in recommending Giuliani, who served as former President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, be disbarred. “The misconduct here sadly transcends all his past accomplishments.”

Those accomplishments include “leadership and inspiration to all Americans in the aftermath of the September 11th terrorist attacks” — the reasons The Citadel’s Board of Visitors cited in 2007 when awarding Giuliani an honorary doctorate in public administration.

These days, however, The Citadel officials don’t want to talk about Giuliani, his myriad troubles — including newfound status as "co-conspirator 1" in Trump's latest federal indictment — or the honorary The Citadel degree he continues to enjoy.

And in a series of internal The Citadel emails, which Raw Story obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request, school officials detail how they decided to close ranks, protect themselves and deflect Giuliani-related scrutiny.

‘Domestic terrorist behavior’

Giuliani’s honorary degrees first caught my attention in early 2022 while working as deputy editor at Insider.

Three schools — the University of Rhode Island, Drexel University, Middlebury College — had recently stripped “America’s mayor” of honorary degrees.

Such actions are uncommon in academia, the rationales notably severe.

Upon Rhode Island University relieving Giuliani of his honorary degree, President Marc Parlange concluded that Giuliani had “encouraged domestic terrorist behavior”.

Giuliani aided “an insurrection against democracy itself,” Middlebury President Laurie L. Patton declared.

Drexel admonished Giuliani for “undermining the public’s faith in our democratic institutions and in the integrity of our judicial system”.

Given this, I asked then-Insider reporter Hanna Kang to contact five schools that had also bestowed honorary degrees on Giuliani — Georgetown University, Syracuse University, St. John Fisher University, Loyola University Maryland and The Citadel. See whether they, too, planned to take those honors back, I asked.

ALSO READ: Giuliani’s ‘donkey show’: How fake electors and coercion allegations may doom ‘America’s mayor’

With the possible exception of Syracuse University (full disclosure: my alma mater), the schools had made no formal moves to deep-six or otherwise alter the status of Giuliani’s honorary degrees. Nor did they have much, if anything, to say about Giuliani.

But of these five schools, The Citadel alone is a public institution. As such, it’s subject to something the others are not — public records laws.

So in May, while recently working with Raw Story investigative reporter Mark Alesia to determine whether the five schools had reconsidered their stances in light of new Giuliani-related developments, Raw Story filed a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request with The Citadel for school records pertaining to Giuliani.

In late July, The Citadel released to Raw Story several hundred responsive documents.

Within the document dump were a series of emails sent among school officials, administrators and members of the Board of Visitors — a government-appointed body responsible for the “direction and supervision” of The Citadel — detailing their plans to stay mum on Giuliani’s honorary degree.

‘Protect them’

The Citadel Board of Visitors’ consists of up to 14 voting members who are elected to six-year terms by South Carolina’s General Assembly and governor.

The members of The Citadel Board of Visitors are “dedicated to the principles of duty, honesty, loyalty, integrity, and accountability,” according to its “Commitment to Excellent and Ethics” document.

And conferring honorary degrees ranks among the specific duties of The Citadel’s Board of Visitors.

But when faced with questions from Raw Story about the status of Giuliani’s degree, Board of Visitors remained silent.

School officials, for their parts, angled to “protect” the Board of Visitors, according to emails obtained through Raw Story’s South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

“We could decline to reply, like we have with Business Insider recently, or provide a modified version of what we first sent BI when they asked, which is: Honorary degree recipients are determined by the Board of Visitors, the college’s governing body. Here is a link to the announcement when the Board presented Giuliani with an honorary degree in 2007: https://www.citadel.edu/root/honorary_degrees,” The Citadel spokesman Zachary Watson wrote to Col. William R. “Sonny” Leggett, The Citadel’s vice president for communications and marketing, on May 17.

No to the latter, Leggett replied.

“I would just not respond- I wouldn’t put it on the BoV- we still need to protect them,” Leggett wrote Watson. “The worse they run is we failed to respond.”

Source: The Citadel emails obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

Watson concurred: “Yep, that’s my preference too. Just wanted to pull options in case.”

Raw Story’s article, published on May 22, would go on to report: “The Citadel spokesman Zachary Watson acknowledged — but did not answer — Raw Story’s questions about the status of the honorary degree Rudy Giuliani received from the South Carolina military school in 2007.”

This was just the latest example of The Citadel dodging questions about Giuliani.

When Board of Visitors member Allison Dean Love received a Giuliani-related email from Insider in June 2022, she did not reply, but instead forwarded the message to Leggett, according to records obtained by Raw Story.

Similarly, Board of Visitors member Dylan Goff demurred.

“We will not be responding,” Goff wrote to Love and Leggett.

Leggett briefed The Citadel’s president, Glenn M. Walters, a retired general in the U.S. Marine Corps and school alumnus. He carbon copied three other top school officials.

“Business Insider has asked whether the school has any additional statement regarding the degree, we are directing them back to the original release- which notes Giuliani was also recognized as Time's Person of the year in 2001 and granted honorary knighthood in 2002 by Queen Elizabeth II,” Leggett wrote Walters. “The reporter is now reaching out to BOV members seeking comment. We will send a message to the Board and encourage them to direct all queries to [the Office of Communication and Marketing].”

Leggett then issued marching orders.

“Business Insider is working on a piece regarding Rudy Giuliani's honorary degrees. The Citadel presented Giuliani with an honorary degree of Doctor of Public Administration in 2007 … Business Insider is seeking comment regarding the degree, we are directing them back to the original release. If contacted, please direct the reporter, Hanna Kang, back to [the Office of Communication and Marketing],” he wrote on June 17, 2022, in an email addressed to more than 30 recipients, including Board of Visitors members and top college officials.

After Insider published an article featuring The Citadel and Giuliani’s honorary degree, Leggett quarterbacked damage control.

“Thoughts? Should we tell the board,” Cardon B. Crawford, senior vice president of The Citadel and a retired Army colonel, wrote to Lori Hedstrom, executive assistant to the Board of Visitors.

“Yes I think COL Leggett should craft an email to the Board. I can send to them on his behalf. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thank you,” Hedstrom wrote back.

Leggett also wrote Crawford.

Source: The Citadel emails obtained through a South Carolina Freedom of Information Act request.

“Since we are updating the board on Irizarry, we may wish to flag this for them as well,” Leggett wrote, referring to a former The Citadel cadet who had recently been sentenced to jail time for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Leggett continued: “The Citadel is mentioned in the piece as having awarded Giuliani an honorary degree and the opening image of Giuliani at The Citadel receiving said honor (below)… but no one from the staff or alums provided comments to the article. It’s business insider so it isn’t getting much attention, though they did @citadel1842 in their twitter posting.”

Kang, a most diligent reporter, kept trying to get answers.

But throughout 2022, The Citadel kept stonewalling her.

“FYSA in case Ms. Kang did not reach out to you all. I did not intend to respond of course,” Citadel Alumni Association Executive Director Tom McAlister wrote Leggett later that year after receiving an email from Kang.

“Thanks, we are not engaging with her either,” Leggett wrote back.

Is Giuliani a role model for cadets?

In late July, Raw Story asked The Citadel about these internal emails, posing questions to each member of The Citadel’s Board of Visitors and several top college officials, including Walters, the school president.

Incoming freshman march at The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina on August 19, 2013 in Charleston, South Carolina. The Citadel, which began in 1842, has about 2,300 undergraduate students. Richard Ellis/Getty Images

Among our questions:

  • Is The Citadel's Board of Visitors currently reviewing the status of the honorary degree The Citadel granted Mr. Giuliani in 2007? If so, what has prompted such a review, and where does this process stand? If not, why not?
  • To what degree is The Citadel concerned about Mr. Giuliani's role in the effort to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election?
  • The Citadel's honor code states that cadets “will not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate those who do.” Rudy Giuliani has been accused by various entities, including the U.S. House January 6 Select Committee and DC Bar Association, of lying and cheating in an attempt to illegally overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. Does The Citadel believe that Rudy Giuliani has lied or cheated?
  • Does The Citadel still consider Mr. Giuliani a role model for cadets?
  • Why — per the emails Raw Story reviewed — did several of The Citadel's Board of Visitors decline to answer reporter questions about Mr. Giuliani's 2007 honorary degree after receiving inquiries from Insider and Raw Story?
  • Why did The Citadel's communications staff in 2022 "encourage" Board of Visitors members to "direct all queries to OCM" regarding Mr. Giuliani?
  • In a May 17 email between [vice president for communications and marketing] Col. Sonny Leggett and [college spokesman] Zach Watson, which is discussing a request for comment from Raw Story, Col. Leggett states: "I would just not respond- I wouldn’t put it on the BoV- we still need to protect them. The worse they run is we failed to respond." What, specifically, is The Citadel staff protecting the Board of Visitors from?

Four days passed after Raw Story sent the questions. None of the 20 officials responded.

On July 25, Raw Story followed up by phone and email to again ask them for their answers.

More silence.

Instead, Watson, the school spokesman, emailed Raw Story a two-sentence statement:

“The Citadel has never revoked an honorary degree and does not have a process to do so. Designated members of The Citadel’s Office of Communications and Marketing serve as spokespersons for the college and, therefore, often act as designees for media inquiries directed to members of the Administration or Board of Visitors.”

Watson did not respond to a follow-up question asking whether this statement represents the views of The Citadel’s administration, The Citadel’s Board of Visitors, or both.

Rudy Giuliani signs and autograph for The Citadel graduate Creighton Nash after the graduation ceremony on May 5, 2007, in Charleston, S.C. Stephen Morton/Getty Images

Nor did he respond to later questions about Giuliani’s newly established status as “co-conspirator 1” in Trump’s newest federal indictment.

Representatives for Giuliani did not respond to requests for comment. In May, Giuliani spokesman Ted Goodman blasted the schools that had taken honorary degrees away from Giuliani.

"It'll be interesting to see who is behind these efforts to attack Mayor Giuliani and if anyone at these schools will inform these students about the basic principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ and if they'll educate these students on the mayor's past as the man who took down the mafia, cleaned up New York and comforted the nation following 9/11," Goodman told Raw Story. "Frankly, we weren't even aware of those decisions, and it's just disappointing, and it says more about the culture of these institutions than anything else."

‘When you know better, do better’

A 2019 The Citadel memorandum concerning honorary degrees states that there should be a “compelling reason why it would be particularly fitting for The Citadel to honor the nominee, in the form of a clear link between the nominee’s achievements and The Citadel’s mission and its core values.”

The memorandum doesn’t detail a formal process for revoking an honorary degree that’s already been awarded.

It also doesn’t expressly state the Board of Visitors cannot take an honorary degree back. Under the heading “compliance,” the memorandum states: “Failure to comply with this policy may prevent a deserving individual from receiving appropriate recognition from The Citadel.”

With this as backdrop, Raw Story asked three lawmakers with direct ties to The Citadel about what the school’s Board of Visitors should do with Giuliani’s honorary degree.

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who in 1999 became the first female cadet to graduate from The Citadel, dismissed the notion of her alma mater rescinding Giuliani’s degree.

ALSO READ: Inside Trump’s six-person team of alleged co-conspirators and their effort to overturn Election 2020

“I’m not a big fan of cancel culture. Giuliani 20 years ago is different than the Giuliani today,” she told Raw Story correspondent Matt Laslo during an interview at the U.S. Capitol. “Everyone, including colleges, has a 1st Amendment right to do things like that. And I don’t think that any college should be discredited for that sort of thing.”

Mace noted that the “world changed” on Sept. 11, 2001, and Giuliani, as mayor of New York, provided rare and essential leadership in the midst of an unthinkable crisis.

“It was a very historic moment. And I actually think it’s kind of gross to take that away from someone,” Mace said. “This whole cancel thing — people got to grow the f— … just grow up. You know what, just grow up. Move on and look forward. Because it’s very divisive. It’s very divisive for our country.”

Even with Giuliani facing a host of legal and ethical problems?

“What’s he been convicted of? That’s the problem,” Mace said. “And if you believe in the Constitution and due process, and the law, then people are innocent until proven guilty. Even if you don’t like him personally, that’s the way it works.”

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the U.S. House's assistant Democratic leader whose Charleston-area congressional district includes The Citadel, is more dubious.

“He’s embarrassed himself so much,” Clyburn said of Giuliani in a brief interview with Raw Story. “The school, I don’t think, would want to be embarrassed by him. So, it’s up to them.”

Rep. James Clyburn (D-SC) speaks during a dedication ceremony for a new statue of Pierre L'Enfant at the U.S. Capitol on February 28, 2022. Pierre L'Enfant was a French-American military engineer who designed the initial urban plan for Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

The Citadel’s elected representative in the South Carolina House of Representatives went further.

“When I think about the ongoing revelations of the behavior and statements of Rudy Giuliani, I am reminded of the old Southern adage that ‘the chickens always come home to roost’,” said state Rep. Wendell Gilliard (D-SC). “There is nothing that surprises me about him anymore and, frankly, the less said about him, the better.”

As it pertains to The Citadel, Gilliard said, “I am more apt to think of the wisdom in Maya Angelou’s words, ‘do the best that you can with what you know, and when you know better, do better’. So, I am more interested in what those that run The Citadel will do with all the things that have been revealed about Giuliani.”

The Citadel's Honor Code, for its part, advocates "doing the right thing when no one is watching," and also, to “do the right thing when everyone is watching".

Matt Laslo contributed to this report.

Revealed: Newt Gingrich’s campaign still owes creditors $4.6 million

All hail Newt Gingrich — still the king of presidential campaign debt.

Gingrich's 2012 presidential campaign committee continues to owe creditors more than $4.63 million, according to new financial documents filed Friday with the Federal Election Commission.

No other presidential campaign committee from any past election cycle owes more.

Gingrich's committee debt has largely remained the same for the past decade, with dozens of campaign vendors who haven't been made whole.

Twitter, Comcast, FedEx and a consulting company run by another former Republican presidential candidate — Herman Cain, who died in 2020 of COVID-19 — are among Gingrich's 2012 presidential campaign creditors. Gingrich's campaign committee also owes money to Gingrich himself as well as the committee's treasurer, Taylor Swindle.

Gingrich is not personally liable for his campaign committee's debts, per federal law. But he could personally help his campaign pay off debts if he wanted, either using his own money or raising money from others.

Has he? No. The former U.S. House speaker has done little to settle the debts of a campaign committee that bears his name — "Newt 2012."

That hasn't stopped Gingrich from criticizing what he considers the irresponsible spending practices of other politicians.

"The nation is currently $31.4 trillion in the red," Gingrich wrote in a February opinion article published in the Daily Mail. "Astonishingly, by 2025, interest on the debt may be a larger budget item than the entire U.S. Department of Defense. In the 2022 fiscal year, $475 billion was consumed by interest payments. That's nearly as much as the $677 billion spent on education and more than is spent on veterans' benefits and transportation — combined. A balanced budget — the novel concept of not spending more than is collected in revenue – can save the nation from this fiscal insanity."

"But it won't be easy to get there," Gingrich added. "I know what it takes."

A representative for Gingrich could not be reached for comment.

Despite his old campaign committee's insolvency, Gingrich continues to rank among the Republican Party's favorite fundraising surrogates. He frequently sends solicitations to conservative donors on behalf of political committees such as the Republican National Committee and GOP candidates including former President Donald Trump and 2022 U.S. Senate candidate Herschel Walker of Georgia.

"I just released my new book March to the Majority, and it is flying off the shelves," Gingrich wrote in an email Thursday on behalf of the National Republican Congressional Committee. "I wanted to make sure you got a copy, which is why I teamed up with House Republicans to provide a free signed copy to anyone who contributes just $35 to defend the Republican majority."

And while Gingrich's old presidential campaign leads all others in the debt category, several other notable also-rans from presidential campaigns past also owe sizable amounts.

Among then: Republican Rick Santorum, who this week reported to the FEC owing creditors nearly $1 million across two presidential campaign committees from his failed 2012 and 2016 presidential runs.

'Gays for Trump' leader wants Republicans to stop focusing on 'stupid gray areas'

Once upon a time — say, December — you could find Donald Trump talking an awfully strong pro-gay game.

“We are fighting for the gay community, and we are fighting and fighting hard,” he told a Mar-a-Lago ballroom’s worth of LGBTQ revelers gathered for a Log Cabin Republican gala, as reported by Politico.

That builds on a litany of statements made by and about Trump — “President Trump is the most pro-gay president in American history,” declared former acting director of national intelligence Richard Grenell — regarding the former president’s support for LGBTQ Americans.

Heck, as recently as 2019, you could buy rainbow-hued Trump “pride” products and “LGBTQ for Trump” swag from Trump’s campaign website to help fund his political efforts.

Trump critics, however, argue that Trump’s words and fundraising efforts are wholly overridden by his decidedly anti-LGBTQ actions as president, from draconian transgender military policies to the nominations of conservative federal judges that could threaten the rights of gay and transgender Americans. Advocacy group Human Rights Campaign cited Trump’s presidential administration for “highly unusual and abusive efforts” to “quietly roll back critical protections, programs and services for the LGBTQ+ community”.

Now, as the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, Trump has become a leading combatant in the nation’s ever-growing culture war, particularly against people who identify with the “T” — transgender — in “LGBTQ” .

“No serious country should be telling its children that they were born with the wrong gender,” Trump declared in a January campaign video, adding that gender-affirming medical treatment for transgender youth is “ridiculous”.

“We will defeat the cult of gender ideology to reassert that God created two genders,” Trump vowed at a South Carolina campaign rally earlier this year.

A “toxic poison of gender ideology” is permeating the United States, Trump told attendees at a Moms for Liberty convention last month in Philadelphia.

RELATED ARTICLE: DeSantis defends widely-criticized anti-LGBTQ ad

It’s an open attempt to re-enforce his standing with far-right conservatives, particularly those wooed by Trump’s most formidable challenger of the moment, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, whose campaign last month — Pride Month — chided Trump for his LGBTQ support.

Enter Peter Boykin.

As the founder and president of Gays for Trump, Boykin readily acknowledges that Trump detractors may view him as a “chicken for Colonel Sanders”-type figure.

Gays for Trump leader Peter Boykin speaks at a rally on the National Mall on Sept. 16, 2017, in Washington, D.C. Courtesy: C-SPAN

But Boykin, who himself is running as a Republican for lieutenant governor of North Carolina, says he believes Trump will stay true to pro-gay beliefs he’s publicly demonstrated since the 1980s.

“He still is the best for the LGBT community, and he has not gone overboard when he talks about transgenderism and things like that,” Boykin said. “He's not attacking the transgender community. He's just stating what even most of us believe. You know, like our children need to not be pushed in the face. But he's not saying you can't be transgender. He's not getting up there and saying ‘gays are going to hell’ or ‘transgenders are evil’ like some of our other politicians.”

Boykin says he keeps reminding people that “Donald Trump is no different than he was in the ‘80s when he had Trump clinics for people who had HIV,” Boykin said. “He's been supportive of the gay community. He hires people based on their ability. And that's the biggest thing that Republicans need to continue to do — the failure that I see of the Democrats is when they hire people just based on, ‘they’re Black’ or ‘they're lesbian, gay or they're transgender’ and they can't do the damn job.”

Boykin noted that Trump, as president, secured a widely-touted deal to provide uninsured Americans with pre-exposure prophylaxis — PrEP — a drug that can prevent HIV infection that’s particularly popular among gay men.

He also cited GOP tech entrepreneur and megadonor Peter Thiel’s speech on the final day of the 2016 Republican National Convention, just minutes before Trump himself took the stage, as emblematic of Trump’s true feelings about sexual identity in America.

“Now we are told that the great debate is about who gets to use which bathroom. This is a distraction from our real problems. Who cares?” Thiel told Republican delegates, who responded with enthusiastic applause. “Of course, every American has a unique identity. I am proud to be gay. I am proud to be a Republican. But most of all, I am proud to be an American.”

For Boykin, Republican voters need to temper their obsession with other people’s private lives — and private parts. Republicans need to stop fighting each other on social issues, he said, and instead focus on beating Democrats on matters of broad national concern.

“It’s all, ‘tranny on a canny!’ And you’re ignoring the real issues that are going on … the border, the debt ceiling thing again, and now, Trump's been arrested,” Boykin said. “We're ignoring the real issues worrying about these stupid gray areas. Everybody wants to call everyone a RINO, everybody wants to use the word ‘woke,’ everybody uses the word ‘racist’. It's all b—--- to sell newspapers, sell ads, get donations. But it's not taking care of the real issues.

Similarly, some far-right Republicans’ fixation on drag shows, “groomers” and the threat of pedophilia specifically from non-heterosexuals is nonsensical, Boykin said.

“‘Groomers’ — it's a very good little catch phrase, but it's pedophiles we’re talking about, and that's straight, gay, transgender, whatever,” he said. “I don't want to go back to like the ‘50s — stuff where, you know, ‘Oh, God, please stay away from my kids because you're gay!’ That's b—---. Gay people are not pedophiles. Just like straight people are not pedophiles. Pedophiles are pedophile. Go after them. Let's figure out what we're actually going after.

As for transgender Americans, “Most transgenders I know well, they just leave us the hell alone,” Boykin said. “We had no problem before. Donald Trump didn't have a problem with transgender users in any bathroom. It's become insane with the sports debate and the other things, and it is just — media.”

Boykin called on Trump, whose campaign did not respond to requests for comment for this article, to strike back against this rhetoric and stand up for LGBTQ Americans — conservatives, in particular, even as other Republican presidential candidates attempt to frame Trump’s support for gays as a liability.

(Last week, a little-known nonprofit group calling itself “Advancing Our Values” plastered Iowa with mailers lauding Trump’s LGBTQ bona fides — a development that Laura Belin of Iowa political blog Bleeding Heartland described as “dirty tricks” and “phony praise” that “designed to create negative views of Trump among potential GOP caucus-goers.”)

And Trump, Boykin said, should pick Arizona gubernatorial also-ran Kari Lake as his vice presidential running mate, given her own history of supporting gay conservatives.

Trump should also keep courting gay Republicans, including Gays for Trump and the flagship group for conservative gays, the Log Cabin Republicans, Boykin said.

Among Republicans, Trump, he said, is “still the only candidate out there that supports the gay community.”

Republican National Committee raised money with Nikki Haley on night of Trump's indictment

On the night news broke that former President Donald Trump has been indicted in connection with a federal probe into his alleged mishandling of classified material, the Republican National Committee blasted out a survey and fundraising email to its massive list of supporters.

It contained a message from a notable 2024 presidential candidate.

And no, not Trump.

Rather, it was former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, one of Trump's GOP primary opponents, who's previously said the former president has no future in the Republican Party.

It contained a message from a notable 2024 presidential candidate.

And no, not Trump.

Rather, it was former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, one of Trump's GOP primary opponents, who's previously said the former president has no future in the Republican Party.

"It’s more important than ever that we stand up for our founding ideas and American values. That means defending capitalism, protecting freedom, and ensuring American security," wrote Haley, who directed recipients to fill out a "top secret" and "confidential" survey that asked questions about matters such as inflation, critical race theory, and securing the Southern border.

Complete the survey, and Haley and the RNC prompt you to make a donation that will "benefit RNC and Nikki Haley for President."

The timing of the Haley/RNC fundraising message — while decidedly curious — wasn't tied to Trump's indictment, but instead, a case of coincidental pre-scheduling, a person familiar with the email's distribution told Raw Story.

Republican National Committee / Nikki Haley for President fundraising email from the night former President Donald Trump was federally indicted. (Email screenshot)

Reached late Thursday night, RNC spokesperson Emma Vaughn told Raw Story that "we are already fundraising with other GOP presidential candidates." In recent weeks, GOP candidates Vivek Ramaswamy and Mike Pence — although Pence wasn't yet declared at the time — teamed with the RNC on similar fundraising emails.

Vaughn also noted the RNC on Thursday night sent a Trump-themed text message to supporters that led them to a donation page that in part declared, "We're witnessing what seems to be an unprecedented WITCH HUNT against President Trump, and we can't afford to have Patriotic Americans like YOU sit on the sidelines any longer."

The donation page, however, did not provide an option to split a donation with Trump's 2024 presidential campaign — money would only go to the RNC.

Trump is slated to travel to Miami, Fla., on Tuesday to respond to the charges. Trump has already been arraigned in a separate criminal matter in New York City, where he is charged with 34 felony counts that involve allegedly falsifying business records in connection to hush money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Trump denies any wrongdoing.

"I AM AN INNOCENT MAN!" he said Thursday night.

'Mean, vicious, malignant, hateful': Tucker Carlson’s counterpart recalls their forgotten C-SPAN segment

The young journalist looked a bit tired in his tan sport coat and striped bow tie.

It was early on a Saturday, after all — the 8 a.m. hour on New Year's Eve eve of 1995 — and he spoke in soft, sometimes halting tones about trimming government and encouraging tax cuts. He praised the Washington Post's watchdog reporting. He waxed philosophical about legislative processes in a fashion fit for a history professor.

"The founders didn't want, and I don't think we want, any bill or law or idea to breeze through Congress without a vigorous, and for that reason, grubby, debate," then-Weekly Standard staff writer Tucker Carlson told C-SPAN's "Saturday Journal" host Lew Ketcham. "That is the way the system should, and does work."

So it went. No yelling or cursing. No demonizing or demagoguing. When a chipper caller from Salt Lake City mistakenly referred to liberal magazine "Mother Jones" as "Mother Goose" while asking a question about corporate welfare, the malapropism caused 26-year-old Carlson to visibly swallow a sheepish smile.

Observed through the lens of now, the long-forgotten interview and call-in segment — as of today, the online clip of Carlson's C-SPAN debut has just 624 views during the past 27 1/2 years — is preposterous.

The Carlson of 2023 ranks among the most polarizing men in America, perhaps second only to former President Donald Trump — lionized by millions of conservatives for his bombastic Fox News broadcasts that detractors describe as a cesspool of racism, sexism, homophobia and xenophobia. Carlson's anti-vaccine preaching, election conspiracy-promoting, Jan. 6 insurrection-denying shows were also huge business for Fox News — until the network fired him last month amid numerous controversies, including a discrimination lawsuit and revelations of racist text messages.

"I had no idea how evil he would turn out to be. No idea," author and journalist William Saletan, then a Mother Jones reporter who shared the C-SPAN studio with Carlson that morning, recalled to Raw Story. "And I don't think anything in that conversation prepared me for that."

William Saletan (l), Tucker Carlson (c) and C-SPAN host Lew Ketcham (r) appear on "Saturday Journal" the morning of Dec. 30, 1995.

Carlson's first C-SPAN interview "was notable for not being notable," Saletan said. "He didn't say anything that that was anything off the kind of standard path for what a mid-1990s conservative magazine writer might say about policy or politics."

So what happened to Carlson during the three ensuing decades, as he hopscotched his way from CNN to PBS to MSNBC to the Daily Caller to Fox News?

Saletan grew biblical.

"I'm kind of an Old Testament guy. I think that nobody makes you evil. You just are. And I'm sorry to say that," he said. "But ... I think somebody like him, he had to have had a core of vice, of viciousness, that he either disguised from others, from himself, from his audience. Maybe he suppressed it because you just couldn't say those kind of things out loud and have a career. But as soon as he could have a career and say those things, he started saying them."

Saletan continued: "Anyone watching him today, there's no way to describe that objectively other than mean, vicious, malignant, hateful. He just loves to humiliate people. He's like the kid in grade school who would find anything that he could pick on about you. And if it was your ethnicity, or your religion, that's what he would choose. That's the way he functions. He's a child. He's just absolutely a mean child with an adult job. He probably he had that in him all along."

Carlson could not be reached for comment. But in a video he posted on Twitter after his firing from Fox News, Carlson held court about the concept of truth.

"When honest people say what's true, calmly and without embarrassment, they become powerful. At the same time, the liars, who have been trying to silence them, shrink and they become weaker. That's the iron law of the universe. True things prevail. Where can you still find Americans saying true things? There aren’t many places left, but there are some. And that’s enough. As long as you can hear the words, there is hope."

Carlson also bemoaned how "undeniably big topics" facing the nation — war, civil liberties, science, demographic changes, corporate power, natural resources — are no longer discussed.

"When was the last time you've heard a legitimate debate about any of those issues? It's been a long time," Carlson said. "Debates like that are not permitted in American media."

Carlson, who last appeared on a C-SPAN-produced program in 2018, must've not checked the network's policy- and issue-heavy schedule lately.

What does Saletan, now a writer with The Bulwark, believe Carlson will do next with himself?

"If he thinks it was all a game, he'll probably sit there and collect his severance or whatever he got from Fox," Saletan said. "On the other hand, if he's sincere about this stuff, he might start his own media operation and say, what the hell? I don't have to answer to Rupert Murdoch or corporate executives any more. So I'm going to talk all the time about how the Muslims and the Mexicans are taking over our country."

Rudy Giuliani is still an honored man at these five colleges despite a tsunami of legal scandals

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, a central figure during Donald Trump’s presidency, stands accused of sexually assaulting an ex-employee.

He is also accused of offering to sell presidential pardons for $2 million each — he denies wrongdoing.

And that’s just last week.

Giuliani also repeatedly lied about President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory, according to the House January 6 Committee.

He actively worked to overturn the 2020 presidential election’s results and is facing a civil defamation suit brought by Georgia election workers.

He rallied Trump supporters to stage a “trial by combat” just before they attacked the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and has advocated bombing Mexico.

He violated professional legal standards, per a D.C. Bar disciplinary committee.

Worse yet for Giuliani, he’s endured the suspension of his law license in New York and Washington, D.C, with a New York court declaring Giuliani’s “conduct immediately threatens the public interest” while he “communicated demonstrably false and misleading statements to courts, lawmakers and the public at large in his capacity as lawyer for former President Donald J. Trump and the Trump campaign.”

Even Giuliani’s own lawyer is just about through with him.

But at Georgetown University, Syracuse University, St. John Fisher University, Loyola University Maryland and The Citadel, Giuliani remains an honored man.

At present, each school has allowed Giuliani to keep honorary degrees they bestowed on him before his MAGA-era troubles began — despite, in some cases, mounting outrage from students, faculty and alumni.

Any of them could take Giuliani’s degrees back.

“If at any time during the life of an awardee the University becomes aware of documented evidence of criminal, unethical or immoral behavior or activity, the University has the right to rescind the honorary degree,” Georgetown University’s honorary degree revocation policy states.

“In considering any revocation, Georgetown would follow this policy,” the university wrote in a statement to Raw Story in confirming the former mayor “received an honorary degree from Georgetown in 2002 at the Law Center Commencement.”

Georgetown University officials this week refused to say, however, whether the school’s board and administration are actively attempting to strip Giuliani of his degree, and if so, where the process — if there is one — stands.

That’s more than the other four schools were willing to say about Giuliani.

The Citadel spokesman Zachary Watson acknowledged — but did not answer — Raw Story’s questions about the status of the honorary degree Rudy Giuliani received from the South Carolina military school in 2007.

Then-Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani (center) receives an honorary degree of doctor of public administration from Citadel Associate Provost Isaac Metts (right) on May 5, 2007. Stephen Morton/Getty Images

Officials at Syracuse University and St. John Fisher University in New York, as well as Loyola University Maryland, did not respond to repeated phone and email messages.

Their silence stands in stark contrast to the messages three other schools — the University of Rhode Island, Drexel University in Pennsylvania and Middlebury College in Vermont — have sent Giuliani: they’ve already revoked honorary degrees they had awarded him.

“The totality of Mr. Giuliani’s recent actions, which have led to the suspension of his license to practice law, include repeated unfounded claims of widespread election fraud, have significantly contributed to undermining the public’s faith in our democratic institutions and in the integrity of our judicial system, and stand in clear opposition to Drexel’s values,” Drexel wrote in 2021 when it deep-sixed Giuliani’s 2009 honorary doctor of laws degree.

Last year, after the University of Rhode Island Board of Trustees unanimously revoked honorary degrees awarded to both Giuliani and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn, school President Marc Parlange said that the men “no longer represent the highest level of our values and standards that were evident when we first bestowed the degree.”

‘It’s just disappointing’

In a text message to Raw Story, Giuliani communications and political adviser Ted Goodman said, "Frankly, we weren't even aware of those decisions, and it's just disappointing, and it says more about the culture of these institutions than anything else."

At Georgetown University, institutional culture is exactly the reason why the school should terminate Giuliani’s honorary degree, one student group argues.

The “ongoing revelations about Mr. Giuliani’s inappropriate behavior and personal corruption represent egregious violations of the Jesuit values that guide Georgetown,” the Georgetown University College Democrats told Raw Story in a statement.

“His behavior has clearly risen to the level of ‘unethical and immoral,’ the university's standards for revoking honorary degrees,” the Georgetown University College Democrats continued. “The University should join its peer institutions across the country by immediately revoking Mr. Giuliani’s honorary degree to preserve the integrity and reputation of the school. A failure to do so would compromise Georgetown’s commitment to its Jesuit mission and the advancement of the common good.”

At St. John Fisher University, a private Catholic College near Rochester, N.Y., legal studies professor James Bowers introduced Giuliani before the former mayor received an honorary degree from the school in 2015. But Bowers has since changed his mind on Giuliani, telling Insider last year that he “clearly no longer represents the values that the Board of Trustees and our president professes that they believe in.”

According to student news organization Cardinal Courier, hundreds of alumni signed a letter asking the school to de-honor Giuliani. But university president Gerard Rooney declared in response: "After consultation with board leadership, the Board of Trustees is not planning to revisit this matter at this time."

Eighty miles east down Interstate 90, Giuliani received his earliest honorary degree in 1989 from Syracuse University’s College of Law. He also delivered Syracuse University’s commencement address in May 2002, eight months after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

But as Giuliani’s reputation as “America’s mayor” tarnished, David Bruen, president of Syracuse’s student government from 2021 to 2023, worked through the University Senate in an attempt to rescind the honorary degree.

“It was very concerning because earlier that year was January 6 and he played an integral role in disinformation and trying to overturn the result,” Bruen told Raw Story. “Joe Biden has an actual degree from (Syracuse’s) College of Law and Giuliani tried to overturn the election of an actual alum.”

The University Senate, a body of roughly 150 including students, faculty, and staff, passed a resolution to rescind the degree in spring 2022. More than 75% of the members voted in favor.

The matter went to the Board of Trustees, which commissioned a report on honorary degrees at Syracuse. Last November, the trustees passed criteria for rescinding degrees.

The criteria say Syracuse would consider rescinding an honorary degree only “in the most extreme circumstances, based on misconduct that is so egregious or shocking that it brings the character of the recipient into significant disrepute.”

ALSO READ: Trump again pushes back deadline to reveal his finances

Another part of the standard requires “clear and convincing evidence of the recipient’s misconduct, such as a criminal conviction, a finding or sanction by a court or another adjudicating body like a professional association or regulatory agency, or otherwise irrefutable evidence.”

By the end of last year, it appeared Syracuse University was poised to claw Giuliani’s degree back. But as winter turned to spring and the school year ended, Syracuse University officials hadn’t taken action.

The Syracuse University student government filed a petition for revocation with the University Senate’s Honorary Degrees Committee. Bruen, who graduated from Syracuse University earlier this month, said it will probably take a final, conclusive decision to disbar Giuliani for Syracuse to move forward with revocation of the degree.

“I have confidence that if there’s news, they’ll take action,” Bruen said. “I will be watching very closely.”

So will Giuliani.

"It'll be interesting to see who is behind these efforts to attack Mayor Giuliani and if anyone at these schools will inform these students about the basic principles of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ and if they'll educate these students on the mayor's past as the man who took down the mafia, cleaned up New York and comforted the nation following 9/11," said Goodman, Giuliani’s spokesman.

From Your Site Articles
Related Articles Around the Web

As First Republic Bank faltered, five members of Congress dumped their personal stock investments

At least five members of Congress in mid-March dumped their personal stock shares in now-defunct First Republic Bank — trades that potentially saved the lawmakers or close family members thousands, if not tens of thousands of dollars, according to a Raw Story analysis of congressional financial records.

Reps. Lois Frankel (D-FL), Ro Khanna (D-CA), John Curtis (R-UT), Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and Dan Goldman (D-NY) each sold their shares between March 15 and March 20 as the bank’s credit rating eroded, stock price tumbled and depositors fled.

The lawmakers’ timing of the trades — four of the five bailed out of First Republic Bank stock while share prices still hovered in the $31-to-$35 range down from February highs in the $140s — allowed them to avoid additional losses beyond what they had already experienced. First Republic’s stock traded below $4 a share by the time JPMorgan Chase bought the failing bank earlier this week.

Their trades also coincided with broader bank-related action on Capitol Hill, with Congress fretting over the economic implications of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank imploding and spooling up investigations into their failures.

While there’s no evidence that the lawmakers used information they obtained through their public service to inform their First Republic stock trades, such stock sales “can erode the public’s faith and confidence in Congress,” said Aaron Scherb, senior director of legislative affairs for Common Cause, a nonpartisan government watchdog organization.

“The perception of corruption can be just as damaging as actual corruption in many cases,” said Scherb, noting that a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers have introduced bills that would ban members of Congress and their immediate family members from trading individual stocks at all.

Why lawmakers sold First Republic shares

Khanna’s stock trade disclosures list the owners of the stock as his wife, Ritu Khanna, and their dependent child.

“Rep. Khanna does not own any individual stocks and is a co-sponsor of the TRUST in Congress Act to ban congressional stock trading,” a spokesperson for the congressman told Raw Story. “His wife has assets prior to marriage in a diversified trust managed by an independent third party, which per OGE rules eliminates any conflict. The periodic transaction reports publicly filed show that the First Republic transactions were very small relative to the portfolio and sold at a loss days after the steep fall. All trades have been disclosed.”

The trades listed as being for a child are from “a diversified trust that the family of Rep. Khanna’s wife set up for their grandchildren over which Rep. Khanna has no involvement or control.” Khanna valued the trades at between $2,002 and $30,000 — lawmakers are only required by law to disclose the value of their stock trades in broad ranges.

Frankel, one of Congress’ more active stock traders over the years, sold between $1,000 to $15,000 on March 16, when the stock price was $34.27.

Less than a week later, according to congressional financial disclosures, Frankel purchased up to $15,000 worth of shares in JPMorgan Chase, the bank that would go on to buy First Republic several weeks later.

“My account is managed independently by a money manager who buys and sells stocks at his discretion,” Frankel told Raw Story through a spokesperson.

Goldman spokesperson Simone Kanter similarly indicated that the freshman congressman, who has also established himself as one of Congress’ most frequent stock traders, had no personal involvement in the decision to sell between $1,001 and $15,000 worth of his First Republic shares. Goldman’s trades are executed by a financial adviser whose name his office declined to release.

“Congressman Goldman does not know why the stock was sold since he has had no contact with his advisor about specific trades since he entered Congress,” said Kanter, noting that Goldman has initiated a process to place his stock assets into what’s known as a qualified blind trust — a congressionally approved financial vehicle where a member of Congress formally cedes control of his or her assets to an independent money manager.

Blumenauer reported the sale of $1,001 to $15,000 in First Republic Bank stock on March 20 as a part of his spouse’s retirement portfolio, according to congressional stock disclosures.

“Congressman Blumenauer and his wife, a long-time successful attorney in Portland, have separate financial accounts. They have both retained a money manager with the power of attorney who makes financial decisions without their input or knowledge,” Hillary Barbour, Blumenauer’s communications director, said in a statement.

“For the Congressman’s spouse, the money manager occasionally engages in non-directed trades, meaning that she neither directs, approves, nor has knowledge beforehand of transactions made on her behalf. Congressman Blumenauer owns no individual stocks and has instructed the money manager to not purchase any stock on his behalf,” Barbour said.

Curtis purchased $1,001 to $15,000 worth of First Republic Bank shares on December 20 and sold stock in that same range on March 16, according to congressional disclosures. Curtis’s office did not respond to Raw Story’s requests for comment.

Push to ban congressional stock trading

During the 117th Congress from 2021 to 2022, at least 78 members of Congress — dozens of Democrats and Republicans alike — were found to have violated the STOCK Act's disclosure provisions, according to a tally maintained by Insider.

This year, Raw Story has identified three additional lawmakers — Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE) and Reps. Seth Moulton (D-MA) and Gerry Connolly (D-VA) — who were late disclosing personal stock trades.

Meanwhile, news organizations including the New York Times, Insider, NPR and Sludge have documented rampant financial conflicts of interests among dozens of members of Congress, such as those who bought and sold defense contractor stock while occupying positions on congressional armed services committees or otherwise voting on measures to send such companies billions of federal dollars. The executive and judicial branches are riddled with similar financial conflict issues, too, as the Wall Street Journal has reported.

A plan to enact a congressional stock-trade ban failed during the 2021-2022 congressional session after Democratic House leaders declined to bring any of several existing bills — including one floated by House leaders themselves — up for a vote.

But this year, a bipartisan group of lawmakers, including Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX), Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), have introduced several similar stock-ban bills in a renewed push to prohibit federal lawmakers and their spouses from trading stocks altogether. Cryptocurrency trades are also a target.

One of these lawmakers says her colleagues’ First Republic Bank trades are additional proof that members of Congress must prohibit themselves from playing the market.

“In the past few weeks, we’ve seen consistent reports of lawmakers — on both sides of the aisle — making suspiciously timed trades in the days surrounding the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic Bank,” Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA), lead sponsor of a bill that would ban members of Congress and their immediate family members from trading stocks, told Raw Story.

“These trades further erode the trust that the American people have in their elected officials, and they reinforce the importance of banning members of Congress — and their spouses — from trading individual stocks,” Spanberger said. “Rather than moving on to the next news cycle, Congress needs to meet this moment with urgency, action, and a willingness to make clear that lawmakers should be serving the people, not their own stock portfolios.”

Koch Brothers: Teach Our Libertarian Claptrap and Get Millions for Your College!

In 2007, when the Charles Koch Foundation considered giving millions of dollars to Florida State University’s economics department, the offer came with strings attached.

Florida State University ranked a distant second behind George Mason University of Virginia as a recipient of Charles Koch Foundation money. In atax document filed with the Internal Revenue Service, the foundation described its Florida State University funding for 2012 as "general support." 

Some schools’ professors and students were aghast at the funding, arguing that such financial support wasn't widely known on their campuses and could threaten schools’ academic freedoms and independence. Others argued that colleges and universities — long bastions of liberal academics — would be well served by more libertarian courses of study.

Separately, Charles Koch is the financial force behind a “curriculum hub” for high school teachers and college professors that criticizes government and promotes free-market economic principles. He’s also funded programs for public school students, and this year, his foundation donated $25 million to the United Negro College Fund.

At Florida State University, Benson noted in a November 2007 memorandum that the Charles Koch Foundation would not just “give us money to hire anyone we want and fund any graduate student that we choose. There are constraints.”

Benson later added in the memo: “Koch cannot tell a university who to hire, but they are going to try to make sure, through contractual terms and monitoring, that people hired are [to] be consistent with ‘donor Intent.’”

A separate email from November 2007 indicates that Benson asked Charles Koch Foundation officials to review his correspondence with Florida State associates about potential Koch funding.

Trice Jacobson, a Charles Koch Foundation representative, did not respond to questions, although Benson and Florida State University spokesman Dennis Schnittker each confirmed that the emails and documents are authentic.

But Benson noted that the documents were meant for internal use and reflect the “early stages of discussion” well ahead of a 2008 funding agreement signed by the university and the foundation.

That agreement, initiated in 2009, has earned Florida State $1 million through April, according to the university. Until it was revised in 2013, an advisory board would consult with the Charles Koch Foundation to select faculty members funded by the foundation's money.

Benson also said that while he continued serving as Florida State’s economics department chairman until 2012, Charles Koch Foundation money wasn’t a factor.

While foundation initially discussed providing money to help fund Benson’s salary, “that idea was taken off the table very early in negotiations,” he said. “I continued as chair because I felt I could still make a valuable contribution to the department.”

The 2008 agreement between the school and the foundation nevertheless faced harsh criticism from some professors and students who argued it indeed gave the foundation too much power over university hiring decisions.

The school and foundation revised their agreement in 2013 “for clarity” and to emphasize the “fact that faculty hires would be consistent with departmental bylaws and university guidelines,” Schnittker said. “Our work with CKF [Charles Koch Foundation] has always upheld university standards.”

Those guidelines, spelled out in a Florida State University statement about the foundation from May, say the money will not compromise “academic integrity” or infringe on the “academic freedom of our faculty.”  

Ralph Wilson, a mathematics doctoral student and member of FSU Progress Coalition, doesn’t buy it.

Florida State University “willfully and knowingly violated the integrity of FSU by accepting funding meant only to further Koch’s free-market agenda,” said Wilson, whose student group works to “combat the corporatization of higher education.”

The Charles Koch Foundation, meanwhile, “is using our universities solely to further their own agenda and plunder the very foundations of academic freedom,” Wilson said.

At the end of 2012, the foundation reported having almost $265.7 million in assets, according to its most recent tax return filed with the Internal Revenue Service. 

In his 2007 memo to colleagues, Benson acknowledged the school’s relationship with the foundation would invite blowback.

“I guess I am trying to say that this is not an effort to transform the whole department or our curriculum,” Benson wrote. “It is an effort to add to the department in order to offer some students some options that they may not feel they have now, and to create (or more accurately, expand) a cluster of faculty with overlapping interests.”

Benson also predicted entering into an agreement with the foundation carried some risk.

“There clearly is a danger in this, of course. For instance, we might be tempted to lower our standards in order to hire people they like,” Benson wrote, in advocating that the university not do so. “We cannot expect them to be willing to give us free reign to hire anyone we might want, however, so the question becomes, can we find faculty who meet our own standards but who are also acceptable to the funding sources?”

The Koch brothers are best known not for their educational efforts but for controlling a constellation of conservative, politically active nonprofit corporations.

For example, this election cycle alone, six nonprofits connected to the Kochs have combined to air about 44,000 television ads in U.S. Senate races through late August, with the ads typically promoting Republicans or criticizing Democrats.

Keep reading...Show less
BRAND NEW STORIES
@2025 - AlterNet Media Inc. All Rights Reserved. - "Poynter" fonts provided by fontsempire.com.